Therapeutic effect of Wendan Decoction combined with mosapride on gastroesophageal reflux disease after esophageal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common complication of esophageal cancer surgery that can affect quality of life and increase the risk of esophageal stricture and anastomotic leakage. Wendan Decoction (WDD) is a traditional Chinese herbal formula used to treat various gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastritis, functional dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome. Mosapride, a prokinetic agent, functions as a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 agonist, enhancing gastrointestinal motility. AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of WDD combined with mosapride on GERD after esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with GERD were randomly divided into treatment (receiving WDD combined with mosapride) and control (receiving mosapride alone) groups. The treatment was conducted from January 2021 to January 2023. The primary outcome was improved GERD symptoms as measured using the reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ). The secondary outcomes were improved esophageal motility (measured using esophageal manometry), gastric emptying (measured using gastric scintigraphy), and quality of life [measured via the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey]. RESULTS: The treatment group showed a notably reduced RDQ score and improved esophageal motility parameters, such as lower esophageal sphincter pressure, peristaltic amplitude, and peristaltic velocity compared to the control group. The treatment group showed significantly higher gastric emptying rates and SF-36 scores (in both physical and mental domains) compared to the control group. No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: WDD combined with mosapride is an effective and safe therapy for GERD after esophageal cancer surgery. It can improve GERD symptoms, esophageal motility, gastric emptying, and the quality of life of patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm these findings.

Mosapride stimulates human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors in the heart.

Mosapride (4-amino-5-chloro-2-ethoxy-N-[[4-[(4-fluorophenyl) methyl]-2-morpholinyl]-methyl] benzamide) is a potent agonist at gastrointestinal 5-HT4 receptors. Mosapride is an approved drug to treat several gastric diseases. We tested the hypothesis that mosapride also stimulates 5-HT4 receptors in the heart. Mosapride increased the force of contraction and beating rate in isolated atrial preparations from mice with cardiac overexpression of human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors (5-HT4-TG). However, it is inactive in wild-type mouse hearts (WT). Mosapride was less effective and potent than serotonin in raising the force of contraction or the beating rate in 5-HT4-TG. Only in the presence of cilostamide (1 µM), a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, mosapride, and its primary metabolite time dependently raised the force of contraction under isometric conditions in isolated paced human right atrial preparations (HAP, obtained during open heart surgery). In HAP, mosapride (10 µM) reduced serotonin-induced increases in the force of contraction. Mosapride (10 µM) shifted the concentration-response curves to serotonin in HAP to the right. These data suggest that mosapride is a partial agonist at 5-HT4-serotonin receptors in HAP.

Clinical Trial: Efficacy of Mosapride Controlled-release and Nortriptyline in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: A Multicenter, Double-placebo, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled, Parallel Clinical Study.

Background/Aims: Prokinetic agents and neuromodulators are among the treatment options for functional dyspepsia (FD), but their comparative efficacy is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy of mosapride controlled-release (CR) and nortriptyline in patients with FD after 4 weeks of treatment. Methods: Participants with FD were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mosapride CR (mosapride CR 15 mg and nortriptyline placebo) or nortriptyline (mosapride CR placebo and nortriptyline 10 mg) in double-placebo, double-blinded, randomized controlled, parallel clinical study. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients with overall dyspepsia improvement after 4 weeks treatment. The secondary endpoints were changes in individual symptom scores, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Results: One hundred nine participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility, and 54 in the mosapride CR group and 50 in the nortriptyline group were included in the modified intention-to-treat protocol. The rate of overall dyspepsia improvement was similar between groups (53.7% vs 54.0%, P = 0.976). There was no difference in the efficacy of mosapride CR and nortriptyline in a subgroup analysis by FD subtype (59.3% vs 52.5% in postprandial distress syndrome, P = 0.615; 44.4% vs 40.0% in epigastric pain syndrome, P = > 0.999; 50.0% vs 59.1% in overlap, P = 0.565; respectively). Both treatments significantly improved anxiety, depression, and quality of life from baseline. Conclusion: Mosapride CR and nortriptyline showed similar efficacy in patients with FD regardless of the subtype. Both treatments could be equally helpful for improving quality of life and psychological well-being while also relieving dyspepsia.

Efficacy and safety of Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate in the treatment of constipation in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate for the treatment of constipation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on studies published until July 2022 in PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang. The efficacy rate, adverse reaction rate, recurrence rate, and clinical symptoms were included in the measured outcomes. RESULTS: The efficacy of Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate in the treatment of constipation was higher than that of mosapride citrate alone (OR = 4.75, 95% CI (3.27, 6.90), Z = 8.19, P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.645). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (OR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.61,1.57), Z = 0.11, P = 0.911; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.958). The recurrence rate of constipation in patients receiving the combination treatment was lower than that of patients treated with mosapride citrate alone (OR = 0.48, 95%CI (0.31, 0.73), Z = 3.38, P = 0.001; I2 = 29.8%, P = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS: Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate demonstrated efficacy and safety in treating constipation. Probiotics have the potential to positively influence gut health and microbial profiles in patients with functional constipation.

An Intragastric Delivery Device Employing FDM Technology: 3D-Printed Tablet Containing Green Developed Mosapride-Saccharin Co-crystals.

Mosapride citrate (MC) is a poorly soluble short half-life drug with more pronounced absorption in the stomach. The present study aimed to incorporate MC co-crystals with enhanced solubility into 3D-printed floating tablets. MC co-crystals were prepared via the green method using Saccharin sod. as a co-former at a (1:1) molar ratio. The prepared co-crystals were assessed for solubility, FTIR, thermal behavior, and SEM. Then, it was incorporated into zero % infill 3D-printed tablets of different configurations at two thickness levels by the FDM printing technique. Printed tablets were evaluated for dimensions, weight deviation, friability, and in vitro floating behavior. Drug release and kinetic of the MC release were also assessed. Solubility study of the co-crystals showed a significant (p value < 0.05) increased solubility over pure MC. FTIR and thermal behavior confirmed hydrogen bonding formation during co-crystallization. The obstructed particles had an erratic protrusion form, similar to a nodule, as illustrated by SEM. The printed tablets showed acceptable physicochemical properties. Tablets floated for about ≥ 12 h without floating lag time. In vitro drug release exhibited variable extended release profiles with different lag times depending on the configuration indicating that the tablet's wall thickness and surface area were the factors manipulated to control drug release. Kinetic analysis of the release data displayed intermediate kinetics between zero-order and diffusional kinetics. The intragastric extended release profile for MC co-crystals of improved solubility could be successfully, economically, and quickly developed utilizing the 3D printing technique.

The role of mosapride and levosulpiride in gut function and glycemic control in diabetic rats.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastroparesis is a well-known consequence of long-standing diabetes that presents with gastric dysmotility in the absence of gastric outlet obstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of mosapride and levosulpiride on improving gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) while regulating glycemic levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rats were divided into the normal control, untreated diabetic, metformin-treated (100 mg/kg/day), mosapride-treated (3 mg/kg/day), levosulpiride-treated (5 mg/kg/day), metformin (100 mg/kg/day) + mosapride (3 mg/kg/day)-treated, and metformin (100 mg/kg/day) + levosulpiride (5 mg/kg/day)-treated diabetic groups. T2DM was induced by a streptozotocin-nicotinamide model. Fourweeks from diabetes onset, the treatment was started orally daily for 2 weeks. Serum glucose, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) levels were measured. Gastric motility study was performed using isolated rat fundus and pylorus strip preparations. Moreover, the intestinal transit rate was measured. RESULTS: Mosapride and levosulpiride administration showed a significant decrease in serum glucose levels with improvement of gastric motility and intestinal transit rate. Mosapride showed a significant increase in serum insulin and GLP-1 levels. Metformin with mosapride and levosulpiride co-administration showed better glycemic control and gastric emptying than either drug administered alone. CONCLUSION: Mosapride and levosulpiride showed comparable prokinetic effects. Metformin administration with mosapride and levosulpiride showed better glycemic control and prokinetic effects. Mosapride provided better glycemic control than levosulpiride. Metformin + mosapride combination provided superior glycemic control and prokinetic effects.

Efficacies of prokinetics and rifaximin on the positivity of a glucose breath test in patients with functional dyspepsia: a randomized trial

Background and aim: prokinetics could eradicate small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mosapride, rifaximin and a combination of mosapride and rifaximin for the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Methods: we randomly assigned patients with functional dyspepsia diagnosed with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive mosapride, rifaximin or a combination of both for two weeks. The hydrogen-methane glucose breath test and symptom questionnaire were surveyed before and after the treatment. Primary outcome was eradication rate of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Secondary outcomes were changes in the gas concentration, symptoms and safety. Results: the eradication rates were 17.2 % (5/29) for mosapride, 32.1 % (9/28) for rifaximin, and 34.6 % (9/26) for the combined groups, with no significant differences among the three groups. Total hydrogen concentration during the glucose breath test significantly decreased in the rifaximin group (p = 0.001). Total methane concentration significantly decreased in the rifaximin and combined groups (p = 0.005). Significant symptomatic improvements were observed in chest and abdominal discomfort with mosapride, in flatulence with rifaximin, and in chest discomfort with the combined groups. Adverse events were similar between the groups. Conclusions: rifaximin has an advantage of reducing gas, whereas mosapride can help to decrease breath hydrogen concentration. Certain intestinal symptoms improved with mosapride alone or combined with rifaximin (AU)

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Sustained-Release Formula of Mosapride-Plus-Esomeprazole Combination Therapy to Esomeprazole Monotherapy in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

We aimed to evaluate whether adding a sustained-release (SR) formula of mosapride to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) would be more effective in controlling symptoms than PPI alone in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Sixty patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation were randomly assigned to two groups: mosapride SR 15 mg combined with esomeprazole 20 mg once daily (ME group) and esomeprazole 20 mg once daily alone (E group). The primary endpoint was the complete-resolution rate of GERD symptoms after eight-week medication, and the secondary endpoints were the complete-resolution rate of GERD symptoms after four-week medication, symptom-improvement rates ≥ 50% after four- and eight-week medication, and change in reflux-disease-questionnaire (RDQ) and GERD-health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scores from baseline at four- and eight-week medication. No significant differences in complete-symptom-resolution rates at eight weeks and four weeks or in the changes in RDQ and GERD-HRQL scores from baseline at four- and eight-week medication were observed between the ME and E groups. The symptom-improvement rate of ≥50% after four and eight weeks was comparable between both groups. Adding mosapride SR to esomeprazole in patients with GERD provides no additional benefits in controlling GERD symptoms.

The influence of mosapride on gut microbiota of carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis rats based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Mosapride significantly improves intestinal motility in liver cirrhosis, ultimately leading to the reduction in plasma endotoxin levels and bacterial translocation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of mosapride on intestinal microecology in cirrhotic rats and its potential mechanisms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats that were pathogen-free (weight 200-220 g) were randomly divided into a control group (n = 15), model group (n = 15) and mosapride group (n = 15). Then, the pathological changes in the liver and intestine were determined through tissue staining and using transmission electron microscope (TEM). Bacterial translocation was examined. High throughput 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to determine the changes of gut microbiota in each group. RESULTS: Compared with the model group, mosapride treatment induced no attenuation in hepatic morphology and pathology changes. The TEM indicated no differences in intestinal structure in both groups. There was a significant decline in the rate of gut microbiota translocation in the mosapride group compared with the model group. There were intestinal microbiota changes in the mosapride group compared with that of the model group, including Bacteroidetes, Prevotellaceae, Alloprevotella, Ruminiclostridium, Negativicutes, Selenomonadales, Veillonellaceae, Anaerovibrio, Campylobacterales, Epsilonbacteraeota, Helicobacter, Oscillibacter, Verrucomicrobiales, Akkermansia, Intestinimonas, Eubacterium, Clostridiaceae, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Tyzzerella, Actinobacteria, and Bifidobacteriales. Among these bacteria, Alloprevotella showed a strong correlation with the other bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we concluded that mosapride may reduce intestinal bacterial translocation through regulating the gut microbiota in rats with hepatic cirrhosis.

[Effect of electroacupuncture combined with mosapride on gastric motility in diabetic gastroparesis rats].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) at "Zusanli" (ST 36) combined with mosapride on gastric emptying rate and gastric motility in the rats with diabetic gastroparesis. METHODS: Using random number table method, 68 male SD rats were divided into a blank group (12 rats) and a model establishment group (56 rats). In the model establishment group, the models of diabetic gastroparesis were established with intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin combined with high-fat and high-sugar diet. Six weeks later, the successful rat models in the model establishment group were randomized into a model group, an EA group, a mosapride group and a combined treatment group, 12 rats in each one. In the EA group, EA was exerted at "Zusanli" (ST 36) (disperse-dense wave, 2 Hz/15 Hz in frequency, 2 mA in intensity) for 20 min. In the mosapride group, mosapride was intervened with intragastric administration (2 mg/kg). In the combined treatment group, electroacupuncture at "Zusanli" (ST 36) was combined with intragastric administration of mosapride. The intervention was given once daily in each group. There was 1 day at interval after 6-day intervention, consecutively for 5 weeks. At the end of intervention, the random blood glucose, gastric emptying rate and the data of gastric motility (average intra-gastric pressure, amplitude and frequency of gastric motility) were detected. RESULTS: Compared with the blank group, blood glucose was increased in the model group (P<0.001). Blood glucose was reduced in the EA group, the mosapride group and the combined treatment group as compared with the model group separately (P<0.001, P<0.01), whereas, compared with the mosapride group, blood glucose was decreased in the combined treatment group (P<0.05). In comparison with the blank group, the gastric emptying rate, the average intra-gastric pressure and the amplitude of gastric motility were all decreased in the model group (P<0.001) and the frequency of gastric motility was increased (P<0.001). Gastric emptying rate, the average intra-gastric pressure and the amplitude of gastric motility were increased in the EA group, the mosapride group and the combined treatment group (P<0.01, P<0.05, P<0.001) and the frequency of gastric motility was decreased (P<0.001) as compared with the model group respectively. Compared with the EA group, the average intra-gastric pressure and the amplitude of gastric motility were increased in the combined treatment group (P<0.001). In comparison with the mosapride group, the gastric emptying rate, the average intra-gastric pressure, the amplitude and frequency of gastric motility in the combined treatment group, as well as the frequency of gastric motility in the EA group were all increased (P<0.05, P<0.001, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Electroacupuncture at "Zusanli" (ST 36) combined with intragastric administration of mosapride could regulate blood glucose and improve the gastric motility in the rats with diabetic gastroparesis. The effect is better than either simple electroacupuncture or mosapride.

Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination tablet of mosapride, pancreatin, and simethicone relative to single-component mosapride tablets in healthy Mexican subjects.

Abbott Laboratories de México S.A. de C.V. developed a new fixed-dose combination of mosapride 5 mg, pancreatin 170 mg, and simethicone 125 mg as an alternative to the mosapride monotherapy to improve overall satisfaction and adequate relief of gastrointestinal disorders symptoms and to reduce multiple pill burden. As a part of the fixed-dose combination registration process in Mexico, a pharmacokinetic and relative bioavailability study was carried out to demonstrate nonexistence of pharmacokinetic interaction when mosapride is administered alone or in combination with pancreatin and simethicone using DOSIER® (mosapride) 5-mg tablets as a reference product. Tolerability of the fixed-dose combination tablet was assessed. In this open-label, randomized, oral single-dose, two-way crossover study, 65 healthy male and female subjects received either the fixed-dose combination tablet or the reference product during each study period. The two study periods were separated by a 7-day washout period. Mosapride concentrations in plasma samples were determined using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method. Blood samples were collected for up to 16 h post dose. The primary evaluation criteria were Cmax and AUC0-t for mosapride. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of geometric means for Cmax (96.12% to 110.90%) and AUC0-t (99.07% to 108.06%) were within the defined acceptance limits of 75% to 133% and 80% to 125% for Cmax and AUC0-t , respectively, indicating bioequivalence between the two products. Both products were safe and well tolerated. Therefore, mosapride in combination with pancreatin and simethicone tablet is bioequivalent to mosapride alone, and no new safety signals emerged.

Efficacy of mosapride versus domperidone in the treatment of functional dyspepsia and its effects on gastric motility indexes and gastrointestinal hormone levels / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of mosapride versus domperidone in the treatment of functional dyspepsia and its effects on gastric motility indexes and gastrointestinal hormone levels. Methods:Ninety-four patients with functional dyspepsia who received treatment in Huzhou Linghu People's Hospital between May 2019 and May 2021 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo treatment with either domperidone (control group, n = 47) or mosapride (study group, n = 47). Efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results:Total response rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( χ2 = 5.04, P = 0.025). After medication, motilin, plasma leptin and corticotropin-releasing hormone in the study group were (184.22 ± 25.36) μg/mL, (18.57 ± 2.44) μg/L, (7.21 ± 1.14) pg/mL, respectively, which were superior to those in the control group [(111.25 ± 21.00) μg/mL, (15.41 ± 2.28) μg/L, (9.02 ± 1.32) μg/mL, t = 15.19, 6.48, 16.23, P < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001]. After medication, cholecystokinin, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and gastrin levels in the study group were (45.36 ± 5.12) ng/L, (5.48 ± 1.25) ng/L, (86.35 ± 12.11) pg/mL, and (105.24 ± 12.05) ng/L, respectively, which were significantly superior to those in the control group [(50.21 ± 6.18) ng/L, (7.01 ± 0.98) ng/L, (98.75 ± 14.18) pg/mL and (97.35 ± 11.48) ng/L, t = 4.14, 6.60, 4.55, 3.25, P < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.002]. The recurrence rate in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.13% vs. 27.66%, χ2 = 4.66, P = 0.031). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (14.89% vs. 34.04%, χ2 = 10.80; P = 0.001). Conclusion:Mosapride has a better therapeutic effect on functional dyspepsia, exhibits a greater effect on improving gastric motility indexes and gastrointestinal hormone levels, and leads to a lower incidence of recurred functional dyspepsia than domperidone. Therefore, mosapride for treatment of functional dyspepsia deserves clinical promotion.

Effect of electroacupuncture combined with mosapride on gastric motility in diabetic gastroparesis rats / 中国针灸

OBJECTIVE@#To observe the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) at "Zusanli" (ST 36) combined with mosapride on gastric emptying rate and gastric motility in the rats with diabetic gastroparesis.@*METHODS@#Using random number table method, 68 male SD rats were divided into a blank group (12 rats) and a model establishment group (56 rats). In the model establishment group, the models of diabetic gastroparesis were established with intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin combined with high-fat and high-sugar diet. Six weeks later, the successful rat models in the model establishment group were randomized into a model group, an EA group, a mosapride group and a combined treatment group, 12 rats in each one. In the EA group, EA was exerted at "Zusanli" (ST 36) (disperse-dense wave, 2 Hz/15 Hz in frequency, 2 mA in intensity) for 20 min. In the mosapride group, mosapride was intervened with intragastric administration (2 mg/kg). In the combined treatment group, electroacupuncture at "Zusanli" (ST 36) was combined with intragastric administration of mosapride. The intervention was given once daily in each group. There was 1 day at interval after 6-day intervention, consecutively for 5 weeks. At the end of intervention, the random blood glucose, gastric emptying rate and the data of gastric motility (average intra-gastric pressure, amplitude and frequency of gastric motility) were detected.@*RESULTS@#Compared with the blank group, blood glucose was increased in the model group (P<0.001). Blood glucose was reduced in the EA group, the mosapride group and the combined treatment group as compared with the model group separately (P<0.001, P<0.01), whereas, compared with the mosapride group, blood glucose was decreased in the combined treatment group (P<0.05). In comparison with the blank group, the gastric emptying rate, the average intra-gastric pressure and the amplitude of gastric motility were all decreased in the model group (P<0.001) and the frequency of gastric motility was increased (P<0.001). Gastric emptying rate, the average intra-gastric pressure and the amplitude of gastric motility were increased in the EA group, the mosapride group and the combined treatment group (P<0.01, P<0.05, P<0.001) and the frequency of gastric motility was decreased (P<0.001) as compared with the model group respectively. Compared with the EA group, the average intra-gastric pressure and the amplitude of gastric motility were increased in the combined treatment group (P<0.001). In comparison with the mosapride group, the gastric emptying rate, the average intra-gastric pressure, the amplitude and frequency of gastric motility in the combined treatment group, as well as the frequency of gastric motility in the EA group were all increased (P<0.05, P<0.001, P<0.01).@*CONCLUSION@#Electroacupuncture at "Zusanli" (ST 36) combined with intragastric administration of mosapride could regulate blood glucose and improve the gastric motility in the rats with diabetic gastroparesis. The effect is better than either simple electroacupuncture or mosapride.

Altered Intestinal Permeability and Drug Repositioning in a Post-operative Ileus Guinea Pig Model.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study is to identify the alteration in intestinal permeability with regard to the development of post-operative ileus (POI). Moreover, we investigated drug repositioning in the treatment of POI. METHODS: An experimental POI model was developed using guinea pigs. To measure intestinal permeability, harvested intestinal membranes of the ileum and proximal colon was used in an Ussing chamber. To identify the mechanisms associated with altered permeability, we measured leukocyte count and expression of calprotectin, claudin-1, claudin-2, and mast cell tryptase. We compared control, POI, and drug groups (mosapride [0.3 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, orally], glutamine [500 mg/kg, orally], or ketotifen [1 mg/kg, orally] with regard to these parameters. RESULTS: Increased permeability after surgery significantly decreased after administration of mosapride, glutamine, or ketotifen. Leukocyte counts increased in the POI group and decreased significantly after administration of mosapride (0.3 mg/kg) in the ileum, and mosapride (0.3 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg), glutamine, or ketotifen in the proximal colon. Increased expression of calprotectin after surgery decreased after administration of mosapride (0.3 mg/kg), glutamine, or ketotifen in the ileum and proximal colon, and mosapride (1 mg/kg) in the ileum. The expression of claudin-1 decreased significantly and that of claudin-2 increased after operation. After administration of glutamine, the expression of both proteins was restored. Finally, mast cell tryptase levels increased in the POI group and decreased significantly after administration of ketotifen. CONCLUSIONS: The alteration in intestinal permeability is one of the factors involved in the pathogenesis of POI. We repositioned 3 drugs (mosapride, glutamine, and ketotifen) as novel therapeutic agents for POI.

Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Controlled-release, Once-daily UIC201609/UIC201610 Combination Therapy for Functional Dyspepsia: Preliminary Study.

Backgrounds/Aims: Functional dyspepsia is a disease involving a range of upper gastrointestinal symptoms derived from various pathophysiologies. Tablets containing a combination of rabeprazole and controlled-release (CR) mosapride were recently developed. To investigate a more effective treatment, this trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of UIC201609/UIC201610 as a preliminary study. Methods: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study was performed on 30 subjects. UIC201609/UIC201610 (combination of rabeprazole and CR mosapride) was the case group, and the two control groups were rabeprazole 10 mg once a day and mosapride 15 mg CR tablet once a day. As a primary efficacy endpoint of the study, the changes in the total score of eight items of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index-Korean version were analyzed at 2 weeks and 4 weeks. The outcomes regarding safety were collected. Results: The total symptom score of Nepean Dyspepsia Index-Korean decreased in the rabeprazole single group (29.4±17.1), mosapride CR single group (33.4±15.6), and UIC201609/UIC201610 group (33.4±11.8) at 4 weeks without significant differences. On the other hand, the UIC201609/UIC201610 combination group showed more score reduction of pain in the upper abdomen, burning in the upper abdomen compared to each control group, but it did not reach statistical significance. No difference was found in safety analysis. Conclusions: UIC201609/UIC201610 once daily showed some improvement in epigastric pain and dyspepsia in patients with functional dyspepsia, but there was no significance. Further study based on the advanced clinical trial design will be needed to confirm the efficacy of UIC201609/UIC201610 combination therapy in the future.

Efficacy and Safety of DWJ1252 Compared With Gasmotin in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prokinetics such as mosapride citrate CR (conventional-release; Gasmotin) are commonly used in functional dyspepsia (FD). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-a-day mosapride citrate SR (DWJ1252), a sustained-release formulation of mosapride citrate, compared with mosapride citrate CR 3 times a day, in patients with FD. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study, 119 patients with FD (by the Rome III criteria, 60 for mosapride citrate SR and 59 for mosapride citrate CR) were randomly allocated to mosapride citrate SR once daily or mosapride citrate CR thrice daily for 4 weeks in 16 medical institutions. Primary end point was the change in gastrointestinal symptom (GIS) score from baseline, assessed by GIS questionnaires on 5-point Likert scale after 4-week treatment. Secondary end points and safety profiles were also analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 51 and 49 subjects in the mosapride citrate SR and mosapride citrate CR groups, respectively. GIS scores at week 4 were significantly reduced in both groups (mean ± SD: -10.04 ± 4.45 and -10.86 ± 5.53 in the mosapride citrate SR and mosapride citrate CR groups, respectively; P < 0.001), and the GIS changes from baseline did not differ between the 2 groups (difference, 0.82 point; 95% CI, -1.17, 2.81; P = 0.643). Changes in GIS at weeks 2 and 4 and quality of life at week 4, and the improvement rates of global assessments at weeks 2 and 4, did not differ between the groups. Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups, and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with FD, mosapride citrate SR once daily is as effective as mosapride citrate CR thrice daily, with a similar safety profile.

A case of laryngopharyngeal reflux-associated chronic cough: Misinterpretation of treatment efficacy causes diagnostic delay.

A 62-year-old woman presented with a dry cough lasting 18 months. She had previously been examined by multiple doctors, but no abnormalities were observed. Several medications such as rabeprazole and inhaled corticosteroids were administered as test treatments without any improvement. Therefore, the possibility of biological disease, including acid reflux, had been mistakenly ruled out. We examined the sputum gram stain. The result showed phagocyted normal bacterial flora, suggesting aspiration. Laryngoscopy revealed edema of the arytenoid cartilage. The patient was finally diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux and silent aspiration. This case suggested that the ineffectiveness of proton-pump inhibitors cannot always exclude the presence of reflux disease and the usefulness of gram stain examination to detect silent aspiration.

[Effect of Tiaoli Piwei needling technique on diabetic gastroparesis and transmembrane protein 16A].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the therapeutic effect of Tiaoli Piwei needling technique (acupuncture for regulating spleen and stomach) on diabetic gastroparesis (DGP), and to explore its possible mechanism. METHODS: A total of 128 patients with DGP were randomized into an observation group (64 cases, 4 cases dropped off) and a control group (64 cases, 4 cases dropped off). On the basis of intervention on controlling blood glucose by western medication, Tiaoli Piwei needling technique was adopted at Zhongwan (CV 12), Zusanli (ST 36), Yinlingquan (SP 9), Xuehai (SP 10), Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Diji (SP 8), etc. in the observation group, once a day. Mosapride citrate dispersible tablet 5 mg was given orally 3 times a day in the control group. The treatment was given 6 times a week in the both groups, and totally 4-week treatment was required. Before and after treatment, the DGP symptom score, serum content of transmembrane protein 16A (ANO1) were observed, and the clinical therapeutic effect and the safety were evaluated in the both groups. RESULTS: After treatment, the each subitem score (belching, abdominal distension, inappetence, nausea and vomiting, epigastric pain, abnormal defecation) and the total score of DGP symptom were decreased in both groups (P<0.05), the subitem scores of belching, abdominal distension, inappetence, nausea and vomiting and the total score in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the serum contents of transmembrane protein 16A were reduced in both groups (P<0.05), and that in the observation group was lower than the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 86.7% (52/60) in the observation group, which was superior to 70.0% (42/60) in the control group (P<0.05). Subcutaneous hematoma occurred in 5 cases in the observation group, which was improved after cold compress without other particular intervention. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic effect of Tiaoli Piwei needling technique on improving symptoms in patients with diabetic gastroparesis is superior to mosapride citrate dispersible tablet, its mechanism may be related to alleviating the damage of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC).

Additional Mosapride to Proton Pump Inhibitor for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the additive effect of mosapride to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is still controversial. This meta-analysis integrated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which mosapride combined with a PPI was compared with a PPI alone in GERD treatment. METHODS: RCTs were systematically searched with the PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and the Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi database. We combined the data from the RCTs with a random effects model, calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) and pooled the risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included nine RCTs in the present meta-analysis. In the mosapride combined with PPI group, the improvement of the symptom score was significantly greater than that in the PPI alone group without significant heterogeneity (SMD: -0.28, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.12, p = 0.0007). In the mosapride combined with PPI group, the symptom score after treatment was significantly lower than that in the PPI alone group (SMD: -0.24, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.06, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Mosapride combined with a PPI significantly improved the reflux symptom score compared with that of PPI alone.

Severe Gastroparesis After Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

A 70-year-old man was treated with catheter ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The treatment consisted of pulmonary vein isolation and radiofrequency ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus line. However, the patient started vomiting two days after ablation. Abdominal radiography and plain abdominal computed tomography revealed gastric distension and massive accumulation of food residues. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy after fasting for two days revealed no organic stricture; food residues were retained in the stomach but not in the duodenum, suggesting gastroparesis. The most likely mechanism underlying gastroparesis associated with AF ablation is collateral periesophageal vagal nerve injury. Mosapride citrate is considered effective for symptoms.