The role of autophagy in calcium oxalate kidney stone: A systematic review of the literature.

Background: Calcium oxalate kidney stone is one of the common diseases in the urinary system and has a high recurrence rate. Currently, the pathogenesis of kidney stone and the methods to prevent recurrence are still being investigated. Autophagy, as an event of cellular self-repair, has received attention in the field of kidney stone in recent years. In some current studies, autophagy has shown destructiveness and protectiveness in the pathogenesis of kidney stone. The inhibition or promotion of autophagy may be a key target for future kidney stone therapy. This systematic literature review discusses the function of autophagy in kidney stone pathogenesis in the context of current research and synthesizes the evidence analysis to provide a basis for new future therapies. Method: We systematically reviewed the literature during September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles on studying the role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of calcium oxalate kidney stone were extracted from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, including in vivo versus in vitro experiments. The study topic, language and publication date were not restricted. Two authors (Li and Zhou) searched and screened the literature. Results: We screened 18 articles from the 33 collected articles, of which 6 conducted in vitro cellular studies, four conducted animal studies, eight conducted cellular studies with animal studies, and five studied human specimens. In early studies, the literature generally concluded that autophagy is deleterious in the development of kidney stone. In 2020, the idea of the protectiveness of autophagy associated with kidney stone was first proposed and focused on targeting transcription factor EB. In addition, the interaction of autophagy with other cellular events and the regulation of signaling molecules are focused on in this paper. Conclusion: This systematic review provides advances in research on the role of autophagy in renal calculi. The current studies suggest that both upregulation and downregulation of autophagy may ameliorate injury in kidney stone models. The authors prefer the upregulation of autophagy as a future research direction for kidney stone treatment.

A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective single-center study.

The aim of this research is to compare the efficiency and safety between endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-modified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) in a single session for the treatment of complex nephrolithiasis. 140 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with multiple pyelocaliceal stones or staghorn renal calculi were enrolled and reviewed retrospectively. Demographic, clinical information and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Demographic variables and stone characteristics did not show statistically differences. Over 80% of the patients were diagnosed with multiple pyelocaliceal stones, while the remainders were branched renal calculi. Over half of the patients were classified into medium and high Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity scoring system (S-ReSC) score groups. The stone free rate (SFR) in the single session was significantly higher in the ECIRS group than in the Mini-PCNL group (88.06% vs. 66.67%, P = 0.003). The subgroup analysis revealed that ECIRS was more efficacious than Mini-PCNL for complex renal calculi with medium and high S-ReSC scores (P = 0.002). A nonsignificant but relatively lower postoperative complication rate was noted in the ECIRS group (7.5 vs. 16.0%, P = 0.12). With the exception of postoperative hospitalization days (P < 0.001), significant difference was not detected between the two groups for other procedure-related information. ECIRS in the GMSV position is an effective and safe treatment especially for medium and severe complex nephrolithiasis, with significant higher SFR in the single session and relatively low procedure-associated morbidity compared to Mini-PCNL.

Variability in stone composition and metabolic correlation between kidneys in patients with bilateral nephrolithiasis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical significance of discordant stone analyses in patients undergoing bilateral ureteroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing stone extraction with bilateral ureteroscopy at our institution in an aim to identify patients who had bilateral stone analysis and 24-h urine chemistry data available. Stones were then classified based upon the dominant present (> 50%). Twenty-four hour urinalysis results were reviewed and statistical analysis performed comparing discordant and concordant patient populations, assessing significant differences that would potentially influence clinical management. RESULTS: We identified 79 patients (158 renal units) who had bilateral stones removed at the time of ureteroscopy. The majority of stones were classified as calcium oxalate (CaOx) (60.1%) followed by calcium phosphate (CaP) (27.8%), brushite (5.1%), uric acid (UA) (4.4%), and cystine (2.5%). Discrepancies in stone classifications were present 24% of the time. Evaluation of 24-h urinalysis results demonstrated that patients with CaOx:CaP stone discordance compared to CaOx:CaOx concordant stone formers were more likely to have an elevated pH (p = 0.02) and lower uric acid supersaturation (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies in stone mineral content are common in patients with bilateral stone disease. A single stone analysis from one side in the setting of bilateral stone disease is insufficient for management of patients with bilateral renal stones, and may lead to mismanagement when this misrepresented information is utilized in addition to 24-h urinalysis results. At least one stone analysis should be performed from both sides during a bilateral stone extraction procedure.