Predicting efficacy and guiding procedure choice in non-vascularized bone grafting: a CT Radiomics and clinical predictor approach.

OBJECTIVES: There is no practical approach for accurately predicting the efficacy of non-vascularized bone grafting (NVBG) and guiding its optimal procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 153 patients with 182 hips that underwent NVBG procedures. The patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 130) and a validation cohort (n = 52). In the training cohort, radiomics model, clinical model, and combined radiomics-clinical (C-R) model were constructed using Rad-scores and clinical predictors to predict the efficacy of NVBG. The optimal model was visualized by a nomogram and assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA). 128 hips that underwent successful NVBG were then randomized into a new training cohort (n = 92) and a new validation cohort (n = 36), and three models were constructed and validated to predict the choice of NVBG procedure. RESULTS: Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification, exposure to risk factors postoperative, and Rad-scores consisting of four radiomics features were independent predictors for the efficacy of NVBG (P < 0.05). The C-R model provided better performance in both the training cohort (AUC: 0.818) and validation cohort (AUC: 0.747). To predict the choice of NVBG procedure, the C-R model built by JIC classification and Rad-scores consisting of five radiomics features showed the finest performance in both cohorts (AUC: 0.860 and 0.800, respectively). DCA showed great benefit using the C-R model for the choice of NVBG procedure. CONCLUSION: The approach integrated by CT radiomics and clinical predictors can be visually and quantitatively applied to predict the efficacy and guide the choice of NVBG procedure with great predictive accuracy.

Core decompression vs. allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Background: Core decompression and allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting are used in the early stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head for a period. Since the comparison of the core decompression and allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting are less reported, the purpose of our study was to investigate the difference of two procedures in patients with the osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods: Between January 2018 and January 2019, 59 patients (64 hips) were divided into core decompression group and non-vascularized bone grafting group according to their procedures. The primary outcomes are visual analog score (VAS) and Harris hip score. Survivorship was analyzed with the collapse of the femoral head or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the endpoint. Results: At the final follow-up, two hips underwent THA in the core decompression group and three hips in the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group. The radiographic survival rates were 76.9% and 77.3%, respectively, in both groups. The VAS of the core decompression group was 6.08 ± 1.164 and 3.30 ± 1.431 before and 2 years after operation (P < 0.05), respectively. The VAS of the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group was 6.00 ± 1.209 and 3.15 ± 1.537 before and 2 years after operation (P < 0.05), respectively. The Harris hip score of the core decompression group was 52.49 ± 6.496 before operation, and 2 years after operation, it increased by 81.14 ± 8.548 (P < 0.05); The Harris hip score of allogenic the non-vascularized bone grafting group was 53.56 ± 5.925 and 81.33 ± 7.243 before and 2 years after operation (P < 0.05), respectively. In the core decompression group, body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 was correlated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA [P < 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.006-1.334], and Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) III was correlated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA (P < 0.05; 95% CI, 2.514-809.650). In the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group, age, BMI, and ARCO stage were significantly associated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical survival rate of the femoral head in the core decompression group was slightly better than that in the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group. There was no significant difference in the radiographic survival rate of the femoral head between the two groups. Both groups can alleviate pain and improve functional of patients, but there was no significant difference in the degree of improvement. In the core decompression group, BMI >25 kg/m2 and ARCO III correlated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA. In the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group, no association was found between age, BMI, and ARCO stage and the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA. Level of evidence: III.

Outcomes Of Reconstruction With Vascularized Vs Non Vascularized Bone Graft After Resection Of Bone Tumours- A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vascularized (VBG) and non-vascularized (NVBG) bone grafting are two crucial biological reconstructive techniques in the management of bone tumours. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of reconstruction with vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts after resection of bone tumours. METHODS: A systematic evaluation of the literature from 2012-2021 was undertaken using the online databases PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library considering only comparative articles with specific outcomes for the restoration of the defect with vascularized and non-vascularized bone graft following the resection of bone tumours. The quality of the research methodology was evaluated using Oxford Quality Scoring System and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized trials and non-randomized comparison research respectively. The SPSS version 23 was used to examine the data that was collected. Musculoskeletal tumour society score (MSTS), bone union time, and complications were the outcomes of this review. RESULTS: Four clinical publications were considered, totalling 178 participants (92 men and 86 women) with 90 patients with VBG and 88 with NVBG. MSTS score and bone union time were the key outcomes that were measured. The overall MSTS (p>0.05) and rate of complications (p>0.05) results were comparable between the two groups, however, VBG had a better rate of bone union (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a result of the quicker bone union, our systematic evaluation demonstrated that VBG causes earlier recovery. Complication rates and functional results were the same in both groups. The link between the bone union time and functional score following VBG and NVBG must also be demonstrated.

[Visual and quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of non-vascularized bone grafting in osteonecrosis of the femoral head via CT-based radiomics and clinical data].

Objective: To investigate the value of CT-based radiomics and clinical data in predicting the efficacy of non-vascularized bone grafting (NVBG) in hip preservation, and to construct a visual, quantifiable, and effective method for decision-making of hip preservation. Methods: Between June 2009 and June 2019, 153 patients (182 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) who underwent NVBG for hip preservation were included, and the training and testing sets were divided in a 7∶3 ratio to define hip preservation success or failure according to the 3-year postoperative follow-up. The radiomic features of the region of interest in the CT images were extracted, and the radiomics-scores were calculated by the linear weighting and coefficients of the radiomic features after dimensionality reduction. The clinical predictors were screened using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The radiomics model, clinical model, and clinical-radiomics (C-R) model were constructed respectively. Their predictive performance for the efficacy of hip preservation was compared in the training and testing sets, with evaluation indexes including area under the curve, C-Index, sensitivity, specificity, and calibration curve, etc. The best model was visualised using nomogram, and its clinical utility was assessed by decision curves. Results: At the 3-year postoperative follow-up, the cumulative survival rate of hip preservation was 70.33%. Continued exposure to risk factors postoperative and Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) staging were clinical predictors of the efficacy of hip preservation, and 13 radiomic features derived from least absolute shrinkage and selection operator downscaling were used to calculate Rad-scores. The C-R model outperformed both the clinical and radiomics models in predicting the efficacy of hip preservation 1, 2, 3 years postoperative in both the training and testing sets ( P<0.05), with good agreement between the predicted and observed values. A nomogram constructed based on the C-R model showed that patients with lower Rad-scores, no further postoperative exposure to risk factors, and B or C1 types of JIC staging had a higher probability of femoral survival at 1, 2, 3 years postoperatively. The decision curve analysis showed that the C-R model had a higher total net benefit than both the clinical and radiomics models with a single predictor, and it could bring more net benefit to patients within a larger probability threshold. Conclusion: The prediction model and nomogram constructed by CT-based radiomics combined with clinical data is a visual, quantifiable, and effective method for decision-making of hip preservation, which can predict the efficacy of NVBG before surgery and has a high value of clinical application.

Visual and quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of non-vascularized bone grafting in osteonecrosis of the femoral head via CT-based radiomics and clinical data / 中国修复重建外科杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the value of CT-based radiomics and clinical data in predicting the efficacy of non-vascularized bone grafting (NVBG) in hip preservation, and to construct a visual, quantifiable, and effective method for decision-making of hip preservation.@*METHODS@#Between June 2009 and June 2019, 153 patients (182 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) who underwent NVBG for hip preservation were included, and the training and testing sets were divided in a 7∶3 ratio to define hip preservation success or failure according to the 3-year postoperative follow-up. The radiomic features of the region of interest in the CT images were extracted, and the radiomics-scores were calculated by the linear weighting and coefficients of the radiomic features after dimensionality reduction. The clinical predictors were screened using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The radiomics model, clinical model, and clinical-radiomics (C-R) model were constructed respectively. Their predictive performance for the efficacy of hip preservation was compared in the training and testing sets, with evaluation indexes including area under the curve, C-Index, sensitivity, specificity, and calibration curve, etc. The best model was visualised using nomogram, and its clinical utility was assessed by decision curves.@*RESULTS@#At the 3-year postoperative follow-up, the cumulative survival rate of hip preservation was 70.33%. Continued exposure to risk factors postoperative and Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) staging were clinical predictors of the efficacy of hip preservation, and 13 radiomic features derived from least absolute shrinkage and selection operator downscaling were used to calculate Rad-scores. The C-R model outperformed both the clinical and radiomics models in predicting the efficacy of hip preservation 1, 2, 3 years postoperative in both the training and testing sets ( P<0.05), with good agreement between the predicted and observed values. A nomogram constructed based on the C-R model showed that patients with lower Rad-scores, no further postoperative exposure to risk factors, and B or C1 types of JIC staging had a higher probability of femoral survival at 1, 2, 3 years postoperatively. The decision curve analysis showed that the C-R model had a higher total net benefit than both the clinical and radiomics models with a single predictor, and it could bring more net benefit to patients within a larger probability threshold.@*CONCLUSION@#The prediction model and nomogram constructed by CT-based radiomics combined with clinical data is a visual, quantifiable, and effective method for decision-making of hip preservation, which can predict the efficacy of NVBG before surgery and has a high value of clinical application.

Impaction Bone Grafting Augmented With a Wire Coil by the Lightbulb Technique for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating disease that primarily affects the hips of young adults. The purpose of this study is to report the mid-term results of impaction bone grafting augmented with a wire coil using the lightbulb technique for ONFH. METHODS: From 1998 to 2016, 50 hips with late precollapsed or early postcollapsed ONFH (28 hips with Association Research Circulation Osseous [ARCO] IIC and 22 with IIIA) were treated by impaction bone grafting augmented with a wire coil using the lightbulb technique. The survival rate was analyzed with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the end point. RESULTS: Thirty-one of the 50 hips had a successful clinical result without conversion to THA at a mean follow-up of 109.2 months. The 5-year survival rate was 68%, 82.1%, and 50% for the entire cohort, ARCO stage IIC, and ARCO stage IIIA, respectively. The 19 hips that had failed were converted to THA at an average of 52.8 months. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model showed that an ARCO stage IIIA disease, a lateral lesion, and a necrotic index ≥0.67 were the independent risk factors for conversion to THA. CONCLUSION: As a head-preserving procedure, the lightbulb technique using impaction bone grafting augmented with a wire coil is worthwhile for patients in an earlier stage of disease and smaller lesion size to postpone the need for THA.

Development of a Practical Model to Predict Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Non-Vascularized Bone Grafting.

Objective: To identify risk factors of failure after Non-Vascularized Bone Grafting (NVBG) in osteonecrosis patients, establish and validate a nomogram predictive model of hip survival after NVBG. Methods: Data on ONFH patients undergoing NVBG at our institution between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Preoperative risk factors potentially associated with failure after NVBG were assessed by univariate Cox regression analyses. A predictive nomogram was developed based on multivariate Cox regression model. The performance of the nomogram model was evaluated by C statistic. Subjects were stratified according to total points calculated from the nomogram and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to further evaluate the discrimination of the model. The model was also internally validated through calibration curves. Results: The overall 2-year and 5-year hip survival percentages were 91.8 and 84.6%, respectively. Age, etiology, Association Research Circulation Osseous stage and range of necrotic lesion were independent risk factors of failure after NVBG. The C statistic of the nomogram model established with these predictors was 0.77 and Kaplan-Meier curves of the tertiles showed satisfactory discrimination of the model. Internal validation by calibration curves indicated favorable consistency between actual and predicted hip survival rate. Conclusion: This predictive model may be a practical tool for patient selection of NVBG. However, future studies are still needed to externally validate this model.

A Comparison of Non-vascularized Bone Grafting and Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Unstable Scaphoid Waist Nonunion.

Background: When nonunion of scaphoid waist is treated with non-vascularized bone grafting with internal fixation, bony union would be affected not only type of bone graft but also fixation method. Thus, we attempted to investigate whether the bony union depends on how surgeons combine bone grafting and internal fixation. Methods: We treated 38 consecutive patients with unstable nonunion of scaphoid waist. The patients were treated with one of three types of non-vascularized bone grafting and internal fixation by random sampling, regardless of the configuration of the nonunion; cortico-cancellous bone grafting with Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation group (12 cases), cortico-cancellous bone grafting with headless compression screw fixation group (13 cases) and cancellous bone grafting with K-wire fixation group (13 cases). We compared "union rate" and "time to union" between groups with statistical analysis. We described clinical features of "failure to union" cases. Results: The mean time to union of cancellous bone grafting with K-wire fixation group was significantly shorter than those of other groups. There was also significant difference in mean time to union between cortico-cancellous bone grafting with K-wire fixation group and cancellous bone grafting with K-wire fixation group (when the type of bone grafting was different). All the "failure to union" cases were sclerotic (Herbert type D2) nonunion treated by cortico-cancellous bone grafting. Conclusions: When treating unstable nonunion of scaphoid waist with non-vascularized bone grafting with internal fixation, cancellous bone grafting with K-wire fixation seems to be advantageous in terms of mean time to union. It seems that both bone grafting and fixation method affected "mean time to union" but the type of bone grafting was more influential in achieving union. The failure to union might be frequent in case of Herbert type D2 nonunion combined with cortico-cancellous bone grafting.

Long-term outcomes of Phemister bone grafting for patients with non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

BACKGROUND: Phemister procedure is an effective treatment for early stage osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH). Since the long-term results of the Phemister procedure are less reported in the literature, the purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of this bone grafting technique in patients with earlier stages of ONFH. METHODS: From 1994 to 2010, 29 hips with pre-collapsed or early collapsed (< 2 mm) ONFH treated by Phemister procedure were evaluated. Among them, nine hips were Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage IIA, 13 stage IIB, 4 stage IIC, and 3 stage IIIA. The mean age was 38.9 years. The mean follow-up was 14 years (1-21 years). Survivorship was analyzed with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the endpoint. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, 10 hips underwent THA at a mean of ten years (1-18 years). The overall clinical success rate for hip preserving was 65.5%, and radiological success rate was 31%. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 50.3 to 76.1. The survival of hips was significantly inferior in female patients (P < 0.01), ARCO stage III disease (P = 0.03), lateral type lesion (P < 0.01), and necrotic index ≥ 0.67 (P < 0.01). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that gender, ARCO stage, and necrotic index were independent risk factors for conversion to THA. CONCLUSION: The study showed acceptable results without complication in patients receiving Phemister procedure for early stage ONFH at a mean follow-up of 14 years. As a head-preserving procedure, Phemister technique is worthwhile for young patients to postpone the need for THA.