Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Today, person-centred care is seen as a cornerstone of health policy and practice, but accommodating individual patient preferences can be challenging, for example involving caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). The aim of this study was to explore Swedish health professionals' perspectives on CSMR and analyse them with regard to potential conflicts that may arise from person-centred care, specifically in relation to shared decision-making. METHODS: A qualitative study using both inductive and deductive content analysis was conducted based on semi-structured interviews. It was based on a purposeful sampling of 12 health professionals: seven obstetricians, three midwives and two neonatologists working at different hospitals in southern and central Sweden. The interviews were recorded either in a telephone call or in a video conference call, and audio files were deleted after transcription. RESULTS: In the interviews, twelve types of expressions (sub-categories) of five types of conflicts (categories) between shared decision-making and CSMR emerged. Most health professionals agreed in principle that women have the right to decide over their own body, but did not believe this included the right to choose surgery without medical indications (patient autonomy). The health professionals also expressed that they had to consider not only the woman's current preferences and health but also her future health, which could be negatively impacted by a CSMR (treatment quality and patient safety). Furthermore, the health professionals did not consider costs in the individual decision, but thought CSMR might lead to crowding-out effects (avoiding treatments that harm others). Although the health professionals emphasised that every CSMR request was addressed individually, they referred to different strategies for avoiding arbitrariness (equality and non-discrimination). Lastly, they described that CSMR entailed a multifaceted decision being individual yet collective, and the use of birth contracts in order to increase a woman's sense of security (an uncomplicated decision-making process). CONCLUSIONS: The complex landscape for handling CSMR in Sweden, arising from a restrictive approach centred on collective and standardised solutions alongside a simultaneous shift towards person-centred care and individual decision-making, was evident in the health professionals' reasoning. Although most health professionals emphasised that the mode of delivery is ultimately a professional decision, they still strived towards shared decision-making through information and support. Given the different views on CSMR, it is of utmost importance for healthcare professionals and women to reach a consensus on how to address this issue and to discuss what patient autonomy and shared decision-making mean in this specific context.

Person-centered care is today a widespread approach, but accommodating individual patient preferences can be challenging, for example involving caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). This study examines Swedish health professionals' views on CSMR. Interviews with 12 health professionals reveal conflicts between CSMR and key aspects of person-centered care, in particular shared decision-making. While professionals acknowledge women's autonomy, they question CSMR without medical need. Concerns include for example treatment quality and patient safety, and avoiding treatments that harm others. The Swedish context, balancing collective solutions with individualized care, complicates decision-making. Unlike countries with more private healthcare, where CSMR support might be higher, Swedish health professionals emphasize shared decision-making despite viewing the mode of delivery as primarily a professional decision. This study sheds light on the challenges in integrating CSMR into person-centered care frameworks.

The red hat - designating leadership using visual and verbal cues: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: During a critical event in the labor and delivery operating room, it is crucial for team members responding to the situation to be aware of the designated leaders. Visual and verbal cues have been utilized to designate leadership in various healthcare settings; however, previous research has indicated mixed results using visual cues for role designation. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to explore the use of the red surgical hat as a visual cue of leadership during obstetric emergency simulation training. We used a mixed-methods design to analyze simulation-based education video and debriefing transcripts. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of participants who declared leadership vs. those who donned the red hat. Participants were more likely to visually declare leadership utilizing a red surgical bouffant hat than to verbally declare leadership. Most participants indicated that observing the red hat to detect leadership in the operating room was more effective than when leaders used a verbal declaration to inform others who was leading. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that utilizing a visual cue of leadership with the red surgical bouffant hat improves participant perceptions of communication of the surgical team during an obstetrical critical event in a simulation environment.

A retrospective study of the management and outcomes of pregnancies with inherited antithrombin deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Antithrombin (AT) deficiency is a rare but highly thrombogenic inherited thrombophilia. Its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) is undefined. There is limited guidance on managing AT deficiency in pregnancy. Some significant issues remain controversial, including risk assessment for prophylactic anticoagulation, anticoagulant therapy, and monitoring. Our goal was to examine if the antepartum management of patients with AT deficiency affected their pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center observational study included pregnant women with inherited AT deficiency in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2013 and 2024. RESULTS: Seventeen pregnancies in 6 women with AT deficiency were identified. A total of 7 pregnancies received adjusted-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and were monitored by anti-Xa level, AT activity, and D-dimer. There were 5 live births (all received LMWH), 7 second-trimester abortions (1 received LMWH), and 5 early pregnancy losses (1 received LMWH). There were 5 abruptio placentae events (3 received LMWH) and 7 thrombotic events (2 received LMWH). CONCLUSIONS: AT deficiency is at least an important partial factor contributing to APO. It is suggested to make a full assessment of AT patients both for venous thrombus embolism and APO risk. We observed a high prevalence of heparin resistance and a positive correlation between adequate anticoagulation and pregnancy outcome based on tight monitoring with anti-Xa level and timely adjustment of the LMWH dosage.

Educational results of the Japan Maternal Emergency Life-Saving (J-MELS) simulation training organized by Japan Council for the Implementation of the Maternal Emergency Life-Saving System (J-CIMELS): a 12-month longitudinal follow-up study in Japan.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of Japan Maternal Emergency Life-Saving (J-MELS) simulation training on obstetric healthcare providers, over a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: A total of 273 trainees from 17 J-MELS Basic courses conducted between August 2021 and October 2023 were included. The trainees' responses to the pre- and post-tests, questionnaires, and self-reports on the usefulness of the J-MELS scenarios in actual clinical settings at 1, 6, and 12 months after the training were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also conducted to identify the factors influencing knowledge retention. RESULTS: We found an overall improvement in clinical knowledge acquisition after J-MELS training and a significant retention of this improvement at least until 12 months later. However, these scores gradually declined over. Trainees reported increased usefulness of J-MELS scenarios in actual clinical practice at 1, 6, and 12 months after training, particularly in managing obstetric emergencies such as atonic postpartum hemorrhage. Knowledge retention was influenced by several specific factors, such as years of clinical experience, affiliated institutions, qualifications, and especially pre-test scores. CONCLUSION: Our longitudinal follow-up study demonstrated, for the first time, the long-term results of J-MELS simulation training using post-tests and self-report data. Our findings provide valuable insight into the impact of J-MELS simulation training on maternal emergency care. By elucidating the factors influencing knowledge retention and practical utility, the findings offer actionable recommendations for optimizing training strategies and improving maternal outcomes in actual clinical practice.

A Retrospective Exploration of Pre-operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefazolin in Cesarean Sections: Implications for Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery.

Background: Post-partum infection is a major contributor to maternal mortality and is responsible for approximately 10% of maternal fatalities worldwide. The risk of infection is substantially higher in cesarean section procedures. Approximately 8% of women who undergo cesarean sections are susceptible to infection. Although the body of evidence supporting the regular pre-operative utilization of prophylactic antibiotic treatment is steadily expanding, its usefulness in cesarean sections has not yet been standardized, and post-partum infection is still a serious medical challenge. We aimed to retrospectively assess the prophylactic effectiveness of cefazolin in combination with other antibiotic agents in cesarean sections. Materials and Methods: Both uni-variable and multi-variable analyses were conducted to identify factors that may affect cefazolin pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean section operations. The uni-variable analysis included timing of administration, operation duration, body mass index (BMI), and wound type. A multi-variable logistic regression model was then created to determine which variables provide independent information in the context of other variables. Results: Time of administration did not affect prophylactic cefazolin efficacy. However, prophylactic cefazolin was 1.43 and 1.77 times more effective when the operation lasted for 45 minutes or more, compared with operations that were shorter than 45 minutes. Patients with a BMI ranging from 18 to 29 kg/m2 showed increased efficacy of prophylactic cefazolin compared with obese patients with a BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2. The effectiveness of prophylactic cefazolin decreased by 95% in patients with clean-contaminated surgical incisions compared with those with clean surgical incisions. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that administering pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic agents to women undergoing cesarean section resulted in a reduction in post-partum infections, thereby reducing maternal mortality. Furthermore, optimal timing of administration, re-dosing if necessary, length of prophylactic medication, and dosing adjustments for obese patients are crucial factors in preventing surgical site infections and promoting antimicrobial stewardship.

Episiotomy: Are Indian Obstetricians Getting the Angle Right?

Background: A mediolateral episiotomy is recommended when indicated at a 60° angle at crowning, to avoid obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) by episiotomies angled too close or distant to the anus. This study surveyed obstetricians in India regarding the recommended episiotomy angle and their ability to correctly draw the angle. Methods: Workshops were conducted in India to share knowledge in the prevention and repair of OASIs. A questionnaire was distributed prior to the workshop. Participants were asked to describe the recommended episiotomy angle and to draw this on a paper replica of the perineum. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the inter-rater reliability between the angle stated and drawn. A 2° difference was deemed acceptable. Standard errors of measurement (SEM) were calculated to measure the range of error of each measurement. Results: One hundred and forty doctors participated. 47.9% described the angle of an episiotomy to be 60°. Only 2.2% drew an angle of 60°, but 8.7% (n = 12) drew between 58 and 62°. Only 5.8% (n = 6) of doctors correctly drew the episiotomy angle they described. There was poor agreement ICC = 0.18 (- 0.01 to 0.36) with a SEM of ± 12.2°. Conclusions: Knowledge surrounding the recommended episiotomy angle is lacking. Doctors are failing to estimate their desired episiotomy angle. This highlights the need for national guidelines, the creation and validation of structured training programmes to improve accuracy, or using fixed-angle devices such as the EPISCISSORS-60 or other proven measurement aids to minimise preventable harm due to human error.

Azithromycin Dosing and Preterm premature rupture of membranes Treatment (ADAPT): A randomized controlled Phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Seven days of antibiotics are recommended in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) to promote latency. Azithromycin has generally replaced a seven-day course of erythromycin in current clinical practice. Azithromycin clears from plasma quickly and concentrates in local tissue which is why daily dosing is not always needed and local tissue, rather than plasma, concentrations are used to determine dosing. Based on limited pharmacokinetic studies in pregnancy, 1g one time dose of azithromycin may not maintain local (amniotic fluid) drug concentrations above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC50) for common genitourinary pathogens (50-500ng/ml). OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the pharmacokinetics of one-time vs daily dosing of azithromycin in the setting of preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM) STUDY DESIGN: This is a randomized clinical trial of singletons with PPROM randomized to 1gram oral azithromycin once or 500mg oral azithromycin daily x7 days. Primary outcome was amniotic fluid azithromycin concentrations over 8 days. Secondary outcomes included plasma azithromycin trough concentrations. Plasma was collected at time points 1-4hrs and 12-24hrs after first dose, and then every 24hrs through 8 days. Amniotic fluid was collected opportunistically throughout the day noninvasively with Always Flex-foam pads. We aimed to enroll 20 participants to achieve N=5 still pregnant through 8 days in each group. Continuous variables compared with Mann Whitney U test and relationship between azithromycin concentration and time assessed with linear regression. RESULTS: The study was halted after N=6 enrolled due to lagging enrollment, with 3 in each group. The mean gestational age of enrollment was 27.1±1.7weeks in the 1g group and 31.0±1.4 weeks in the 500mg daily group. One participant in each group had latency to delivery >7days. Regarding amniotic fluid azithromycin concentration, there was a difference in change in amniotic fluid azithromycin concentration over time between groups (p<0.001). Amniotic fluid concentration of azithromycin was relatively stable in the 1g once group (B=-0.07 (-0.44 - 0.31), p=0.71), in contrast, amniotic fluid concentration (ng/ml) increased over time (hours) in the 500mg daily group (B=1.3 (0.7 - 1.9), p<0.001). By ≥96hours median amniotic fluid levels of azithromycin were lower in the 1g once dosing group (median 11[7-56]) compared to 500mg daily (median 46 [23-196]), with a median difference -27 (-154 to -1), p=0.03. In plasma, there was higher azithromycin concentration during the first 24hrs with 1g once vs 500mg daily (median difference 637ng/ml (101-1547), p=0.01), however by ≥96hrs plasma azithromycin declined and was virtually undetectable in the 1g once group, while trough plasma levels in the 500mg remained elevated (median difference -207ng/ml (-271 to -155), p=0.03). CONCLUSION: 500mg daily dosing of azithromycin maintains higher amniotic fluid concentrations, and more consistently greater than common MICs, over eight days compared to 1g once in the setting of PPROM.

Uterus transplantation: A scoping review focused on obstetric outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Congenital uterine anomalies include a wide diversity of uterine malformations that can compromise reproductive potential. Uterus transplantation (UTx) proposes an innovative treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility; however, there is a lack of standardized protocols to guide clinical management among this population. OBJECTIVES: To describe recipient and donor characteristics and obstetric outcomes in patients undergoing UTx. SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed a literature search using the PubMed database to retrieve available scientific articles. We analyzed the references of included articles to assess additional articles that could be eligible to be included in the review. Likewise, we identified further studies using other methods, including Google Scholar. SELECTION CRITERIA: Titles and abstracts were screened in duplicate to select original reports with information available for the outcomes of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This review assessed the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques used, patient characteristics, obstetric and non-obstetric complications, functional duration of the organ, and neonatal outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Among the 36 reports included in this review we found 55 pregnancies and 38 live births following UTx and a higher success rate for in vivo uterine donations. The most common obstetric complications reported included miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, and gestational hypertension. The most common non-obstetric complications reported include episodes of rejection, acute kidney injury, anemia, and cholestasis. Living donors required a comprehensive preoperative workup, decreasing organ rejection, infection, and vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: More studies are needed to standardize the UTx procedure and improve obstetric, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Further understanding of which recipient and donor characteristics minimize complications will significantly decrease the risk of adverse outcomes.

Psychological experience and coping strategies of pregnant women with acute pancreatitis: a qualitative descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: To clarify the psychological experience and coping strategies in patients with acute pancreatitis in pregnancy (APIP) and propose interventional measures to improve pregnancy outcomes in these women. With an increasing trend of pregnant women in advanced ages and multiparous women, the incidence of APIP has significantly increased. Pregnancy accompanied by concurrent pancreatitis may subject these women to notable psychological stress, which is a factor that has been infrequently reported in previous studies. METHODS: APIP patients were interviewed from December 2020 to June 2021. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews based on an outline, including six questions. The interviews were recorded and analyzed using qualitative content analysis until data saturation was reached. RESULTS: Ten APIP patients were interviewed and four themes were identified, including excessive psychological burden, uncomfortable experience, urgent requirement for adequate medical resources, and importance of social support. CONCLUSION: Patients with APIP suffer from significant psychological stress due to their medical conditions and management. They desired adequate medical resources and social support. The local health department, hospital administrators, and medical staff should understand the psychological requirements and provide adequate healthcare and education that are easily accessible to these APIP patients. In addition, family support should also be encouraged to promote APIP patients' recovery.

Oral glucose tolerance test-The imperfect gold standard for gestational diabetes screening: A qualitative study involving clinicians in regional, rural and remote areas of Western Australia.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: The oral glucose tolerance test is the 'gold standard' for detecting gestational diabetes in Australian and International guidelines. Test completion in regional, rural and remote regions may be as low as 50%. We explored challenges and enablers for regional, rural and remote antenatal clinicians providing gestational diabetes screening to better understand low oral glucose tolerance test completion. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews. Participants eligible for the study were doctors or midwives providing antenatal care in regional, rural and remote Western Australia, between August 2019 and November 2020. Interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed into a Word document. We conducted a thematic analysis after initial categorisation and deduction of themes through workshops involving the research team. RESULTS: We found a diversity of viewpoints on oral glucose tolerance test reliability for detecting gestational diabetes. Themes that emerged were; good collaboration between antenatal clinicians is required for successful screening; screening occurs throughout pregnancy using various tests; clinicians make significant efforts to address barriers; clinicians prioritise therapeutic relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Effective universal screening for gestational diabetes in regional, rural and remote Western Australia is difficult and more complex in practice than guidelines imply. Detecting gestational diabetes requires creative solutions, early identification of at risk women and trust and collaboration between clinicians and women. SO WHAT?: Detection of gestational diabetes in regional, rural and remote Western Australia remains poorly completed. New strategies are required to adequately identify women at risk of adverse birth outcomes relating to hyperglycaemia in pregnancy.

Addressing obstetric violence: a scoping review of interventions in healthcare and their impact on maternal care quality.

Background: The mistreatment and abuse of women during childbirth have been recognized as a major global health challenge, impeding facility-based delivery and contributing to the high maternal mortalities globally. The World Health Organization has specifically called for interventions to deal with obstetric violence. This scoping review consolidates the existing literature on interventions aimed at reducing obstetric violence and synthesizes existing knowledge on their impact in promoting respectful maternity care. Methodology: Thirteen electronic databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2001 to March 2023. A total of 863 records were identified, and 72 full-text articles were retrieved for further screening. The review includes 16 studies, particularly from low- and middle-income countries, with interventions implemented at medical facilities and involving both women and healthcare providers. Eight of the studies were quantitative, three were qualitative and five used a mixed-methods approach. Findings: The results reveal a promising trend in reducing obstetric violence through various interventions. Ten different types of interventions were identified, highlighting strategies to improve the quality of maternity care and enhance patient-centered care. Improved patient-provider communication skills, increased privacy measures, and reduced abuse and mistreatment emerged as common themes. Enhanced communication skills, including open discussions and the right to be informed, were crucial in reducing obstetric violence. Privacy measures, such as separate rooms, curtains, and birth companions effectively decreased incidents of non-confidential care. General abuse and mistreatment, including physical abuse and neglect, were also reduced, leading to improved perceptions of respectful care during childbirth. Conclusion: Overall, the interventions had a favorable impact on obstetric violence reduction and women's childbirth experiences. However, despite promising results, obstetric violence remains prevalent worldwide, necessitating more efforts to implement effective interventions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scoping review on obstetric violence interventions, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art. We suggest that further research is needed to explore new interventions, particularly gender-sensitive interventions, to contribute to a growing body of knowledge on the prevention of obstetric violence.

Midwives' and Obstetric Physicians' Practices Related to Pregnancy Nutrition Counseling: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Dietary intake during pregnancy impacts short- and long-term maternal and fetal health outcomes. Dietary habits are highly individualized and influenced by contextual factors and social determinants of health within each person's lived environment. Midwives and other health care providers are well positioned to facilitate nutrition conversations and interventions with patients related to recommendations and modifications before and during pregnancy. This scoping review synthesizes the literature on perinatal care providers' attitudes and practices related to antenatal nutrition counseling. METHODS: An electronic database literature search was conducted in March 2023 using the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between 1990 and 2023, completed in high-income countries, and evaluated provider practices related to educating pregnancy patients on nutrition. Exclusion criteria included comparison or interventional studies as well as those focused on patient perspectives, specialty diets, comorbidities, or pregnancy complications. Thematic analysis was completed to identify common themes and subthemes across studies related to perinatal care providers' perspectives of pregnancy nutrition. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles were included in the final review. Although providers acknowledged the importance of nutrition for pregnancy outcomes, few reported being able to cover the topic in-depth during antenatal visits. Counseling was usually generalized, limited in scope, and lacked consideration of patient-specific contextual factors such as dietary restrictions, preferences, or access to resources needed to follow recommendations. Provider barriers to comprehensive nutrition counseling included lack of training and time during clinic visits and limited availability of guidelines. DISCUSSION: Multiple gaps in current pregnancy nutrition counseling practices exist. Despite nutrition being viewed by perinatal care providers as an important part of pregnancy, multiple barriers lead to it being overlooked during patient-provider interactions. Contextual factors for both providers and patients contribute to failure of current interventions to consistently and significantly impact dietary habits of pregnant people.

Role of prophylactic tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during cesarean section: A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial.

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is defined by the World Health Organization as blood loss of ≥500 mL within 24 h of delivery. Globally, hemorrhage accounts for 27.1% of maternal deaths, making it the leading direct cause of maternal death. PPH has been identified in more than two-thirds of reported hemorrhage-related deaths, causing 38% of maternal deaths in India. Tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic, has been used to control bleeding after PPH is identified. Materials and Methods: Antenatal women admitted for elective cesarean section were randomized into two arms: the case group (received one gram of tranexamic acid 20 min prior to skin incision) and the control group (received a placebo), each group consisting of 36 participants. Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) registration number - CTRI/2021/02/031579. Results: The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) intraoperative blood loss in the case group was 241.25 (±67.83) mL, and in the control group, it was 344.92 (±146.67) mL (P = 0.001), while postoperative blood loss did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.1470). In terms of the difference in hemoglobin, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001). No significant maternal or neonatal side effects were found. Conclusion: Preoperative tranexamic acid, when given in elective cesarean section, significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss.

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies among women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The pooled effect sizes were reported as odds ratios (OR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and data analysis was performed using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies involving 4,730,728 women were included in this meta-analysis. The results reveal a significant increase in the prevalence of placenta accreta cases after RPL compared to women without RPL (pooled OR 4.04; 95% CI 1.16-14.15; 2 studies; I2 = 94%; P = 0.03). However, no elevated risk of aneuploidies (pooled OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.73-3.90; 5 studies; I2 = 48%; P = 0.22) or congenital anomalies (pooled OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.30; 7 studies; I2 = 13%; P = 0.12) in subsequent pregnancies of women with RPL was observed. Additionally, a moderate increase in the risk of various other obstetric and perinatal outcomes was found. The magnitude of the elevated risk of these adverse outcomes varied depending on the region. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of RPL exhibit a significantly elevated risk of placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancies, along with a moderate increase in the risk of various other adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. However, RPL does not signify an increased risk of aneuploidies or congenital anomalies in a consecutive pregnancy.

Prenatal diagnosis of the umbilical cord torsion at the placental cord insertion site: A case report and literature review.

A 35-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 0) was admitted to our hospital at 28 weeks' gestation with vaginal bleeding from placenta previa. Severe fetal bradycardia was observed during fetal heart rate monitoring. Ultrasonography showed widely dilated veins on the fetal surface of the placenta and an extraordinarily low umbilical artery peak systolic velocity in the Doppler study. Umbilical cord torsion was suspected. On the subsequent day, we performed a cesarean section due to worsening fetal heart rate patterns. Umbilical artery blood gas analysis indicated severe acidemia (pH 7.063), and umbilical cord torsion was confirmed at the placental cord insertion site. Diagnosing UCT prenatally is challenging; however, it can be suspected by scanning for the widely dilated veins on the fetal placental surface, termed as the "Sunset Sign," an abnormally low umbilical artery peak systolic velocity, and other fetal Doppler abnormalities.

Do Birth Outcomes Predicted by Occipital Position Inform Definitions of Occiput Posterior and Occiput Transverse?

Fetal head position significantly influences birth outcomes, with higher rates of complications observed when the fetal head is in the Occiput Posterior (OP) position compared to Occiput Transverse (OT) or Occiput Anterior (OA) positions. There is no consensus in the current literature on the precise rotational point at which the fetal occiput shifts from posterior to transverse, reducing clarity in both scientific and clinical communication. Different studies employ varying definitions of these positions, which affects management decisions. This study aims to determine if a definable threshold exists between the directly posterior and directly transverse positions that correlates with different birth outcomes, thereby proposing a consistent and clinically useful definition for OP versus OT. We analyzed ultrasound data from 570 patients at full dilatation from five previous studies, correlating the angle of the fetal occiput (noted on a clock-face) with birth outcomes. Adverse outcomes were defined as cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, significant postpartum hemorrhage (500 ml or more), obstetric anal sphincter injury, five-minute Apgar scores <7, arterial cord pH <7, base excess less than -12, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4. The study found a continuous relationship between the fetal occipital angle and adverse birth outcomes without a distinct threshold separating OP from OT positions. No clear inflection point was demonstrated in pregnancy outcomes between OT and OP. The relationship between the angle of occiput position and pregnancy outcomes was continuous: the closer the fetal head was to directly OP, the higher the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Given the lack of a clear cut-off and to improve consistency in future research, we recommend dividing the occiput position into four quadrants of 90 degrees each. This classification could standardize reporting and potentially improve clinical decision-making regarding fetal position during labor.

Caesarean section and anal incontinence in women after obstetric anal sphincter injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% women who give birth after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) develop anal incontinence (AI) over their lifetime. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence for a protective benefit of planned caesarean section (CS) to prevent AI after OASI. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase 1974-2024, CINAHL and Cochrane to 7 February 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42022372442). SELECTION CRITERIA: All studies reporting outcomes after OASI and a subsequent birth, by any mode. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eighty-six of 2646 screened studies met inclusion criteria, with nine studies suitable to meta-analyse the primary outcome of 'adjusted AI' after OASI and subsequent birth. Subgroups: short-term AI, long-term AI, AI in asymptomatic women. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: total AI, quality of life, satisfaction/regret, solid/liquid/flatal incontinence, faecal urgency, AI in women with and without subsequent birth, change in AI pre- to post- subsequent birth. MAIN RESULTS: There was no evidence of a difference in adjusted AI after subsequent vaginal birth compared with CS after OASI across all time periods (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.72-1.20; 9 studies, 2104 participants, I2 = 0% p = 0.58), for subgroup analyses or secondary outcomes. There was no evidence of a difference in AI in women with or without subsequent birth (OR = 1.00 95% CI 0.65-1.54; 10 studies, 970 participants, I2 = 35% p = 0.99), or pre- to post- subsequent birth (OR = 0.79 95% CI 0.51-1.25; 13 studies, 5496 participants, I2 = 73% p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Due to low evidence quality, we are unable to determine whether planned caesarean is protective against AI after OASI. Higher quality evidence is required to guide personalised decision-making for asymptomatic women and to determine the effect of subsequent birth mode on long-term AI outcomes.

Comparative Effects of Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol Versus Spinal and Thiopental-Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Lipid Peroxidation in Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, physiological changes can increase oxidative stress (OS) in both mothers and fetuses. The use of anesthesia for cesarean sections (CSs) could exacerbate this stress due to its impact on the ischemia-reperfusion effect. Our study aimed to explore the effects of target-controlled infusion of propofol on OS during CSs, and to compare these effects with those of spinal and thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: The study included ninety parturients undergoing elective CS, allocated into three groups: Group S (spinal) (n = 30), Group P (propofol) (n = 30), and Group TS (thiopental-sevoflurane) (n = 30). Venous blood samples were taken from mothers at three time points, before, during, and after surgery, and one sample was taken from the umbilical vein after delivery. Blood samples were analyzed with the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay and blood gas analysis. A statistical comparison between groups was obtained by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Wilcoxon test where appropriate. RESULTS: Levels of TBARS after the induction of anesthesia were lower in all groups compared to values preoperatively. In Group P, TBARS levels started to decrease in the first five minutes after the induction (1.90 ± 0.47; P < 0.001) and had significantly lower values compared to Group S (2.22 ± 0.21) and Group TS (2.40 ± 0.20). Two hours after surgery, TBARS values were the lowest in Group P (1.76 ± 0.15, P<0.001), compared to Group S (2.18 ± 0.24) and Group TS (2.41 ± 0.21). TBARS value in umbilical venous blood was significantly lower in Group P (1.56 ± 0.16, P < 0.001) compared to Group S (2.18 ± 0.17) and Group TS (2.09 ± 0.09). Umbilical cord venous blood gas values (pH, PCO2, HCO3, lactates, and base excess (BE)) were not different between the groups, except for PO2, which was significantly lower in Group S (20.5 ± 5.0; P < 0.001) compared to Group P (36.5 ± 19.2) and Group TS (33.5 ± 10.1). CONCLUSION: Target-controlled infusion of propofol anesthesia could be advantageous for parturients with compromised oxidative status, especially those undergoing emergency CSs when general anesthesia is required.

Technology advances in diabetes pregnancy: right technology, right person, right time.

This review outlines some of the extraordinary recent advances in diabetes technology, which are transforming the management of type 1 diabetes before, during and after pregnancy. It highlights recent improvements associated with use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) but acknowledges that neither CGM nor insulin pump therapy are adequate for achieving the pregnancy glucose targets. Furthermore, even hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems that are clinically effective outside of pregnancy may not confer additional benefits throughout pregnancy. To date, there is only one HCL system, the CamAPS FX, with a strong evidence base for use during pregnancy, suggesting that the pregnancy benefits are HCL system specific. This is in stark contrast to HCL system use outside of pregnancy, where benefits are HCL category specific. The CamAPS FX HCL system has a rapidly adaptive algorithm and lower glucose targets with benefits across all maternal glucose categories, meaning that it is applicable for all women with type 1 diabetes, before and during pregnancy. For women of reproductive years living with type 2 diabetes, the relative merits of using non-insulin pharmacotherapies vs diabetes technology (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) are unknown. Despite the urgent unmet need and potential benefits, studies of pharmacotherapy and technology use are extremely limited in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes.