Sarcopenia in patients with colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally and the second cancer in terms of mortality. The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with CRC ranges between 12%-60%. Sarcopenia comes from the Greek "sarx" for flesh, and "penia" for loss. Sarcopenia is considered a phenomenon of the aging process and precedes the onset of frailty (primary sarcopenia), but sarcopenia may also result from pathogenic mechanisms and that disorder is termed secondary sarcopenia. Sarcopenia diagnosis is confirmed by the presence of low muscle quantity or quality. Three parameters need to be measured: muscle strength, muscle quantity and physical performance. The standard method to evaluate muscle mass is by analyzing the tomographic total cross-sectional area of all muscle groups at the level of lumbar 3rd vertebra. Sarcopenia may negatively impact on the postoperative outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgical resection. It has been described an association between sarcopenia and numerous poor short-term CRC outcomes like increased perioperative mortality, postoperative sepsis, prolonged length of stay, increased cost of care and physical disability. Sarcopenia may also negatively impact on overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival in patients with non-metastatic and metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, patients with sarcopenia seem prone to toxic effects during chemotherapy, requiring dose deescalations or treatment delays, which seems to reduce treatment efficacy. A multimodal approach including nutritional support (dietary intake, high energy, high protein, and omega-3 fatty acids), exercise programs and anabolic-orexigenic agents (ghrelin, anamorelin), could contribute to muscle mass preservation. Addition of sarcopenia screening to the established clinical-pathological scores for patients undergoing oncological treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery) seems to be the next step for the best of care of CRC patients.

Positive node-ratio in curative-intent treatment for gastric cancer is a strong independent prognostic factor for 5-year overall survival.

INTRODUCTION: This study addressed whether the positive node-ratio (N-ratio) for patients who underwent curative-intent treatment was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) for gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for GA with at least 15 harvested nodes were evaluated for 5-year OS. The best threshold was determined using the area under an receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate models were assessed looking for independent prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2015, 398 consecutive patients were evaluated. The N-ratio ≥11% had an accuracy of 0.764, the sensitivity of 71.1%, the specificity of 81.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.7%, and odds ratio (OR) of 11. After multivariate analysis for OS, age ≥70 years (HR 1.44), need for total gastrectomy (HR 1.45), need for extended resection (HR 1.7), and N-ratio ≥11% (HR 3.7) were unfavorable prognostic factors. D2 lymphadenectomy (HR 0.53) was a protective factor. The median OS according to N-ratio was 14 months for N-ratio >11 vs 58 months for N-ratio <11%. CONCLUSION: The N-ratio ≥11% was an independent negative prognostic factor for patients who underwent treatment for GA with curative intent. The N-ratio ≥11% presented high specificity, high PPV and high OR for risk of death for 5 years after surgery.

Prognostic value of perirenal and/or sinus fat infiltration in patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma: A multicentre cohort study. LARCG Group. / Valor pronóstico de la invasión de grasa perirrenal y/o del seno en pacientes con carcinoma de células renales pT3a: estudio de cohorte multicéntrico. Grupo LARCG.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), relapse-free survival, local and distant (LRFS and DRFS, respectively) rates in patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) considering the perirenal and/or sinus fat infiltration (FI) as prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort of patients with pT3a RCC who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy. The data were extracted from the LARCG (Latin American Renal Cancer Group) database. The demographic, clinical, pathological and surgical variables were evaluated. FI was divided into 4 groups (vein, perirenal, sinus and both fats infiltration). The Kaplan Meier and Cox regression curves were performed. RESULTS: 293 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 61.4 years. The median follow-up was 21 months (r: 1-194). CSS, RFS, LRFS and DRFS estimated at 3 years in the group of both fats' infiltration were 53.1, 45.1, 58.7 and 51.6 months, respectively, and always statistically lower than the rest (P˂0.005). In the multivariate analysis, the infiltration of both fats significantly increased specific mortality, overall and local relapse with respect to vein infiltration (HR: 4.5, 2.42 and 8.08, respectively). The Fuhrman grade and renal pelvis infiltration were independent predictors of CSS and RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Infiltration of both fats increases the risk of overall and local relapse in pT3a RCC. In the same way, it is associated with a lower cancer-specific survival and should be considered as a factor of poor prognosis.

D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer as an independent prognostic factor of 10-year overall survival.

BACKGROUND: The extension of lymphadenectomy for GA remains on debate even after Eastern and Western clinical trials. The main concern is if morbidity of extended lymphadenectomy could be justified based on benefits in oncologic outcomes. This study addressed the extension of lymphadenectomy as a prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) for gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for GA were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate models assessed determinants of OS. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2015, 656 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy were evaluated. Briefly, 455 (69.4%) were male, 397 (60.5%) underwent total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y reconstruction was done in 483 (73.6%), and R0 resection was achieved in 632 patients (96.3%). According to multivariate analysis, the risk of death was increased with older age (≥70-y), high-grade tumors, lesions ≥ 5 cm, positive nodes ≥ 3, and extra-gastric resections. Otherwise, D2 lymphadenectomy improved median OS (37 versus 16 months), 3-y (51.1 versus 32.2%), 5-y (43.2 versus 26), and 10-y OS (30.6 versus 9.4%), with HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.67, p < 0.001). The general median OS was 31 months and 3-, 5-, and 10-y were 47.6, 40, and 27%, respectively. The median follow-up for all patients was 26 months, and for survivors was 65 months. CONCLUSION: This study showed D2 lymphadenectomy for GA as an independent prognostic factor for OS, even after 5-y and until 10-y. Our study suggests that D2 should be offered as the curative-intent treatment for all patients with GA that fit to undergo surgery.