Reproducibility of Cardiac Computed Tomography Classifications of Hypoattenuated Thickening and Peridevice Leak Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

AIMS: To assess the reproducibility of interpreting hypoattenuated thickening (HAT) and peridevice leak (PDL) using cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging following Watchman FLX left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter retrospective reproducibility study, 100 anonymized post-LAAC cardiac CT scans were evaluated within the same cardiac phase by an experienced and a novice rater blinded to prior evaluations. All scans were evaluated twice by each rater, assessing overall HAT and PDL categories as well as specific associated findings based on suggested algorithms for post-LAAC interpretation. Inter- and intra-rater agreement and reliability were evaluated using absolute agreement, Cohen's kappa and Kendall's tau for categorical variables, and mean difference, Bland-Altman plots, limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for continuous variables.Within overall categories of both HAT and PDL, substantial agreement (kappa >0.61) and reliability (Kendall's tau-b  > 0.75) were observed. Specifically, identifying high-grade HAT (kappa >0.78) and distal patency (kappa >0.85) displayed the highest agreement within HAT and PDL interpretation. Meanwhile, measuring the height of the proximal screw hub cove represented the least reliable HAT assessment among both inter- and intra-rater comparisons (ICC<0.75), while suspected leak mechanism represented the least reproducible PDL measure. CONCLUSION: Despite only minimal training of one rater, overall high levels of inter- and intra-rater agreement and reliability were observed across the chosen algorithms for interpretation of HAT and PDL following Watchman FLX LAAC. Prognostic implications of the included variables are to be explored in future trials and registries.

Position Statement on Cardiac Computed Tomography Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is rapidly growing as valid stroke prevention therapy in atrial fibrillation. Cardiac imaging plays an instrumental role in preprocedural planning, procedural execution, and postprocedural follow-up. Recently, cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has made significant advancements, resulting in increasing use both preprocedurally and in outpatient follow-up. It provides a noninvasive, high-resolution alternative to the current standard, transesophageal echocardiography, and may display advantages in both the detection and characterization of device-specific complications, such as peridevice leak and device-related thrombosis. The implementation of CCT in the follow-up after LAAO has identified new findings such as hypoattenuated thickening on the atrial device surface and left atrial appendage contrast patency, which are not readily assessable on transesophageal echocardiography. Currently, there is a lack of standardization for acquisition and interpretation of images and consensus on definitions of essential findings on CCT in the postprocedural phase. This paper intends to provide a practical and standardized approach to both acquisition and interpretation of CCT after LAAO based on a comprehensive review of the literature and expert consensus among European and North American interventional and imaging specialists.

Incidence and temporal evolution of delayed peridevice leak after left atrial appendage closure.

BACKGROUND: Peridevice leak (PDL) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) portends adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, clinical implications, and temporal evolution of PDL after LAAC. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included all patients who underwent LAAC with Watchman FLX and had no PDL detected at the time of implantation. The primary end point was the incidence of new PDL at initial imaging. The composite secondary end point included continued oral anticoagulation after initial imaging, device-related thrombus, stroke or transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, and need for PDL closure at longest follow-up. Temporal evolution of PDL was assessed in patients with available surveillance imaging. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients who completed imaging at 47 days (interquartile range [IQR] 44-50 days), 139 (39%) had new PDL with a mean leak size of 3.2 ± 1.4 mm (median 3.0 mm; IQR 2.0-4.0 mm; range 1.0-9.0 mm). Multiple deployment attempts and larger device size were positive predictors of PDL, while increased contrast volume administration was a negative predictor of PDL. The composite secondary end point occurred in 42 (30%) patients with PDL and 33 (15%) patients without PDL (P < .001). Of the 139 patients with PDL, 43 (31%) had surveillance imaging where the leak size regressed from 3.7 ± 1.8 mm at 46 days (IQR 44-51 days) to 1.7 ± 2.0 mm at 189 days (IQR 158-285 days) (P < .001). The leak size regressed in 33 (77%), remained stable in 4 (9%), and progressed in 6 (14%) cases. CONCLUSION: Despite design improvements, LAAC with Watchman FLX demonstrates a significant incidence of PDL with meaningful clinical implications. Regardless of initial size, most leaks regressed over time.

Association of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion with acute changes in left atrial pressure: An invasive hemodynamic study.

BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic effects of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effect of LAAO on invasive hemodynamics and their correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: We recorded mean left atrial pressure (mLAP) before and after device deployment. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of mLAP increase after deployment, the association between significant mLAP increase after deployment and 45-day peridevice leak (PDL), and the association between mLAP increase and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. A significant mLAP increase was defined as one equal to or greater than the mean percentage increase in mLAP after deployment (≥28%). RESULTS: We included 302 patients (36.4% female; mean age, 75.8 ± 9.5 years). After deployment, mLAP increased in 48% of patients, 38% of whom experienced significant mLAP increase. Independent predictors of mLAP increase were baseline mLAP ≤14 mm Hg, nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, and age per 5 years (odds ratios: 3.66 [95% CI, 2.21-6.05], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.08-3.02], and 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73-0.99], respectively). Significant mLAP increase was an independent predictor of 45-day PDL (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.04-6.26). There was no association between mLAP increase and HF hospitalization. CONCLUSION: After deployment, mLAP acutely rises in 48% of patients, although this is not associated with increased HF hospitalizations. PDL is more likely to develop at 45 days in patients with significant increase in mLAP after deployment, although most leaks were small (<5 mm). These findings suggest that mLAP increase after deployment is not associated with major safety concerns. Additional studies are warranted to explore the long-term hemodynamic effects of LAAO.

Intracardiac vs Transesophageal Echocardiography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With Watchman FLX in the U.S.

BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural imaging is critical for device delivery in transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Although pivotal trials of LAAO devices were conducted using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is an emerging imaging modality. OBJECTIVES: This study compared outcomes after ICE- and TEE-guided Watchman FLX implantation in the SURPASS (SURveillance Post Approval AnalySiS Plan) nationwide LAAO registry. METHODS: Baseline characteristics were compared using chi-square and t-tests. Outcomes were reported in unadjusted and adjusted comparisons via propensity weighting. RESULTS: Between August 2020 and September 2021, LAAO was attempted in 39,759 patients at 698 sites, including 2,272 cases (5.7%) with ICE and 31,835 (80.0%) with TEE. ICE and TEE patients had similar baseline characteristics and mean procedural times (ICE 82 minutes vs TEE 78 minutes). ICE patients were less likely to receive general anesthesia (54% vs 98%, P < 0.01). Successful device implantation (98.3% vs 97.6%) and complete seal rates at 45 days were similar (n = 25,280; 83% vs 82%). Most adverse event rates were similar; unadjusted mortality rates at 45 days were 1.1% for ICE vs 0.8% for TEE (P = 0.14), and 1.0% vs 0.7% (P = 0.27) in adjusted analyses. Even after adjustment, pericardial effusion rates requiring intervention were significantly higher with ICE at 45 days (1.0% vs 0.5%; P = 0.02). This rate decreased as operators performed more ICE-guided procedures, although 82% of operators had performed <10 ICE-guided procedures overall. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest comparison to date, ICE use was infrequent. ICE and TEE both achieved high rates of complete LAAO. ICE was associated with significantly higher rates of pericardial effusion requiring intervention.

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion: Preclinical and Early Clinical Results With the Laminar Device.

BACKGROUND: The Laminar device rotates and closes the left atrial appendage (LAA) using an integrated ball and lock that excludes and eliminates the LAA pouch. There is a low device surface area, minimizing the risk of peridevice leak (PDL) and device-related thrombus (DRT) formation. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Laminar LAA exclusion device in healthy animals and human subjects with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk of ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism. METHODS: The preclinical study implanted the Laminar device into canine subjects that underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopic evaluation, followed by necropsy and histological assessment at 45 and 150-days post-implant. The early clinical study implanted the device in human subjects, followed to 12 months postimplantation. Procedural success was defined as device implantation in the intended location without residual LAA leak >5 mm as seen by TEE. Safety endpoints included freedom from stroke, systemic embolism, pericardial effusion, or tamponade, life-threatening/major bleeding, or death. RESULTS: The Laminar device was successfully implanted in 10 canines. In all animals at 45 days and 150 days, no PDL or DRT was found, and histological examination showed fully closed LAAs covered with neo-endocardium. The device was successfully implanted in 15 human subjects with no safety events out to 12 months postimplantation. All subjects had successful protocol-defined LAA closure without DRT at 45 days by TEE and computed tomography, which remained stable through 12 months' follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The preclinical and early clinical results demonstrate a promising safety and efficacy profile for the Laminar LAA exclusion device.

SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Exclusion of the left atrial appendage to reduce thromboembolic risk related to atrial fibrillation was first performed surgically in 1949. Over the past 2 decades, the field of transcatheter endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded, with a myriad of devices approved or in clinical development. The number of LAAC procedures performed in the United States and worldwide has increased exponentially since the Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device in 2015. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) has previously published statements in 2015 and 2016 providing societal overview of the technology and institutional and operator requirements for LAAC. Since then, results from several important clinical trials and registries have been published, technical expertise and clinical practice have matured over time, and the device and imaging technologies have evolved. Therefore, SCAI prioritized the development of an updated consensus statement to provide recommendations on contemporary, evidence-based best practices for transcatheter LAAC focusing on endovascular devices.

SCAI/HRS expert consensus statement on transcatheter left atrial appendage closure.

Exclusion of the left atrial appendage to reduce thromboembolic risk related to atrial fibrillation was first performed surgically in 1949. Over the past 2 decades, the field of transcatheter endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded, with a myriad of devices approved or in clinical development. The number of LAAC procedures performed in the United States and worldwide has increased exponentially since the Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device in 2015. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) has previously published statements in 2015 and 2016 providing societal overview of the technology and institutional and operator requirements for LAAC. Since then, results from several important clinical trials and registries have been published, technical expertise and clinical practice have matured over time, and the device and imaging technologies have evolved. Therefore, SCAI prioritized the development of an updated consensus statement to provide recommendations on contemporary, evidence-based best practices for transcatheter LAAC focusing on endovascular devices.

Sex Differences in the Combined Ablation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Results From LAACablation Registry.

Background: More than 40% of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures were combined with atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in China. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the sex differences in the combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and LAAC procedures. Methods: Data from the LAACablation (Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Combination With Catheter Ablation) registry, which enrolled AF patients who underwent the combined procedure between 2018 and 2021, were analyzed. Procedural complications, long-term outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) were compared between sexes. Results: Of 931 patients, 402 (43.2%) were women. Compared with men, women were older (age 71.3 ± 7.4 years vs 68.7 ± 8.1 years; P < 0.001), presented more often with paroxysmal AF (52.5% vs 42.7%; P < 0.003), and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (4.1 ± 1.5 vs 3.1 ± 1.5; P < 0.001), but received less often linear ablation and had shorter total procedural times and radiofrequency catheter ablation times. Women had similar rates of total and major procedural complications but presented with a higher incidence of minor complications than men (3.7% vs 1.3%; P = 0.027). Follow-up over 1,812 patient-years revealed similar adverse events between women and men, including all-cause death (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.43-1.85; P = 0.754), thromboembolic events (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.54-2.52; P = 0.697), major bleeding (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.38-2.44; P = 0.935), and their composite (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.56-1.28; P = 0.434). The recurrence rates of atrial tachyarrhythmia were also comparable between sexes presenting either paroxysmal or persistent AF. Women were seen with greater QoL impairment at baseline, but the sex gap narrowed at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: In AF patients who underwent the combined procedure, women had similar procedural safety and long-term efficacy to men and presented greater QoL improvement. (Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Combination With Catheter Ablation [LAACablation]; NCT03788941).

SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Exclusion of the left atrial appendage to reduce thromboembolic risk related to atrial fibrillation was first performed surgically in 1949. Over the past 2 decades, the field of transcatheter endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded, with a myriad of devices approved or in clinical development. The number of LAAC procedures performed in the United States and worldwide has increased exponentially since the Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device in 2015. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) has previously published statements in 2015 and 2016 providing societal overview of the technology and institutional and operator requirements for LAAC. Since then, results from several important clinical trials and registries have been published, technical expertise and clinical practice have matured over time, and the device and imaging technologies have evolved. Therefore, SCAI prioritized the development of an updated consensus statement to provide recommendations on contemporary, evidence-based best practices for transcatheter LAAC focusing on endovascular devices.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With a Novel LAA Occluder for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: More than 90% of thromboses originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Objectives: This study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of LAA closure with the Leftear device (Pulse Scientific) in NVAF patients. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, registry-based study was conducted in 200 NVAF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, female sex) scores ≥2. The primary safety endpoint was defined as any serious adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by a primary composite endpoint of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiac or unexplained death at 1 year of follow-up. Results: The device was implanted in 196 patients, with 1-stop LAA closure combined with atrial fibrillation ablation implemented in 133 patients. The immediate success rate was 100%. There were serious adverse events in 9 patients (4.5%; 95% CI: 1.6%-7.4%), which mainly occurred in 1-stop LAA closure. All pericardial tamponades occurred in 6 patients with 1-stop LAA closure. No patient experienced a major bleeding event or acute device-related thrombus. During the 12-month follow-up period, the risk of the primary composite endpoint was 1.6% (95% CI: 0.3%-4.5%), and statistical noninferiority was achieved (the upper bound of 95% CI: 4.5% < the prespecified maximum annual incidence of 8.0%). Ischemic stroke occurred in 1 patient, 3 patients had incomplete LAA sealing, and no delayed device-related thrombus was found. Conclusions: LAA closure with the novel disc-like occluder shows high procedural success, satisfactory safety, and encouraging efficacy for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF. Compared with 1-stop LAA closure, single LAA closure may be more tolerable. (A multicenter, single-arm clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage system for left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation; ChiCTR1900023035).

Temporal Changes and Clinical Implications of Delayed Peridevice Leak Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess temporal changes and clinical implications of peridevice leak (PDL) after left atrial appendage closure. BACKGROUND: Endocardial left atrial appendage closure devices are alternatives to long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) for patients with atrial fibrillation. PDL >5 mm may prohibit discontinuation of OAC. METHODS: Patients included in the study had: 1) successful Watchman device implantation without immediate PDL; 2) new PDL identified at 45 to 90 days using transesophageal echocardiography; 3) eligibility for OAC; and 4) 1 follow-up transesophageal echocardiographic study for PDL surveillance. Relevant clinical and imaging data were collected by chart review. The combined primary outcome included failure to stop OAC after 45 to 90 days, transient ischemic attack or stroke, device-related thrombi, and need for PDL closure. RESULTS: Relevant data were reviewed for 1,039 successful Watchman device implantations. One hundred eight patients (10.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The average PDL at 45 to 90 days was 3.2 ± 1.6 mm. On the basis of a median PDL of 3 mm, patients were separated into ≤3 mm (n = 73) and >3 mm (n = 35) groups. In the ≤3 mm group, PDL regressed significantly (2.2 ± 0.8 mm vs 1.6 ± 1.4 mm; P = 0.002) after 275 ± 125 days. In the >3 mm group, there was no significant change in PDL (4.9 ± 1.4 mm vs 4.0 ± 3.0 mm; P = 0.12) after 208 ± 137 days. The primary outcome occurred more frequently (69% vs 34%; P = 0.002) in the >3 mm group. The incidence of transient ischemic attack or stroke in patients with PDL was significantly higher compared with patients without PDL, irrespective of PDL size. CONCLUSIONS: New PDL detected by transesophageal echocardiography at 45 to 90 days occurred in a significant percentage of patients and was associated with worse clinical outcomes. PDL ≤3 mm tended to regress over time.

CT assessment of the left atrial appendage post-transcatheter occlusion - A systematic review and meta analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the standard imaging modality used to assess the left atrial appendage (LAA) after transcatheter device occlusion. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) offers an alternative non-invasive modality in these patients. We aimed to conduct a comparison of the two modalities. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature pertaining to CCTA to establish its usefulness during follow-up for patients undergoing LAA device closure. Studies that reported the prevalence of inadequate LAA closure on both CCTA and TEE were further evaluated in a meta-analysis. 19 studies were used in the systematic review, and six studies were used in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The use of CCTA was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting LAA patency than the use of TEE (OR, 2.79, 95% CI 1.34-5.80, p â€‹= â€‹0.006, I2 â€‹= â€‹70.4%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of peridevice gap ≥5 â€‹mm (OR, 3.04, 95% CI 0.70-13.17, p â€‹= â€‹0.13, I2 â€‹= â€‹0%) between the two modalities. Studies that reported LAA assessment in early and delayed phase techniques detected a 25%-50% higher prevalence of LAA patency on the delayed imaging. CONCLUSION: CCTA can be used as an alternative to TEE for LAA assessment post occlusion. Standardized CCTA acquisition and interpretation protocols should be developed for clinical practice.

Peridevice Leak Following Amplatzer Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Cardiac Computed Tomography Classification and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate cardiac computed tomography (CT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) peridevice leak (PDL) assessments, and the clinical relevance of PDL. BACKGROUND: PDL assessment is integral during follow-up after left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. Comparative studies of TEE and cardiac CT are sparse, and the clinical relevance of PDL is uncertain. METHODS: This was a single-center observational study of consecutive patients undergoing LAA occlusion with Amplatzer devices (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/Amulet) between 2010 and 2018 (N = 415). Patients with both 8-week CT and TEE were included for analysis (n = 346). Images were analyzed by blinded investigators (K.K. and A.S.). PDL on cardiac CT was classified from grade 1 to 3, based on PDL at the device disc, device lobe, and LAA contrast patency. Primary clinical outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or all-cause death. RESULTS: PDL was present in 110 patients (32%) by TEE, with 29 (8%) >3 mm. By cardiac CT, 210 patients (61%) had PDL at the disc, with contrast patency in 204 patients (59%). A grade 3 PDL (gap at disc, lobe, and LAA contrast patency) was present in 63 patients (18%). Bland-Altman analysis showed poor agreement between CT and TEE for leak sizing. CT and TEE detected PDL was not significantly associated with worse outcome, hazard ratio: 1.82 (95 % confidence interval: 0.95 to 3.50); p = 0.07 and hazard ratio: 1.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 2.76); p = 0.28, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PDL occurrence is substantially higher with CT compared with TEE, with a large discrepancy between modalities in leak quantification. A novel CT-based classification is proposed, yet PDL was not associated with worse clinical outcome.