Medicación potencialmente inapropiada en adultos mayores con necesidades paliativas en domicilio / Potentially inappropriate medication in older adults with palliative care at home

Resumen Introducción : Los adultos mayores con enfermedades crónicas avanzadas y necesidad de cuidados paliativos están más expuestos a la polifarmacia y a consumir medicación potencialmente inapropiada, la cual genera un alto riesgo de eventos adversos y alteración de la calidad de vida. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la frecuencia de consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada de adultos mayores con necesidad de cuida dos paliativos que ingresaron a cuidados domiciliarios luego de una hospitalización. Métodos : Estudio de corte transversal observacional de registros de dispensación e historias clínicas electró nicas, de adultos mayores en un sistema de cuidados domiciliarios y con necesidades de cuidados paliativos según el rastreo con la herramienta NECPAL, los índices PROFUND y/o PALIAR. Se analizó el consumo de fárma cos durante los 180 días posteriores al ingreso a cuidados domiciliarios. Se clasificaron los fármacos como poten cialmente inapropiados según criterios de LESS-CHRON. Resultados : Se incluyeron 176 pacientes, edad prome dio 87.4 años, 67% mujeres; 78% eran pluripatológicos y 22% presentaban una enfermedad única crónica progre siva. La mortalidad a los 6 meses fue 73%. La mediana de consumo de fármacos por paciente fue 9.1 (RIC = 4-9.7). El 87% consumía medicación potencialmente inapropia da, principalmente antihipertensivos, benzodiacepinas y antipsicóticos. Conclusión : Este estudio observó que los adultos ma yores, con necesidad de cuidados paliativos en cuidados domiciliarios, tienen un alto consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada. Esto refuerza la necesidad de implementar intervenciones efectivas centradas en el paciente, para prevenir la prescripción inadecuada y estimular la de-prescripción.

Abstract Introduction : Older adults with advanced chronic diseases and palliative care needs are more exposed to polypharmacy and use of potentially inappropriate medication, which generates a high risk of adverse events and impaired quality of life. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with palliative care needs receiving home care services after hospital discharge. Methods : Observational cross-sectional study of pharmacy dispensing and electronic health records, of older adults in a home care system and with palliative care needs according to the screening with the NECPAL tool or the PROFUND and/or PALIAR indexes. Dispensed medications during 180 days after admission to home care were analyzed. Medications were classified as po tentially inappropriate according to the LESS-CHRON criteria. Results : We included 176 patients, mean age 87.4 years, 67% were women; 73% were pluripathologic pa tients and 22% had one chronic progressive disease. Mortality at 6 months was 73%. Median frequency of dispensed medications per patient was 9.1 (IQR = 4-9.7). The frequency of potentially inappropriate medication dispensation among patients was 87%, mainly antihy pertensives, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. Conclusion : This study observed that dispensation of potentially inappropriate medication among older adults with palliative care needs and home care services is very high. This emphasizes the need for effective patient-centered interventions to prevent inadequate prescription and stimulate de-prescription.

[Potentially inappropriate medication in older adults with palliative care at home]. / Medicación potencialmente inapropiada en adultos mayores con necesidades paliativas en domicilio.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults with advanced chronic diseases and palliative care needs are more exposed to polypharmacy and use of potentially inappropriate medication, which generates a high risk of adverse events and impaired quality of life. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with palliative care needs receiving home care services after hospital discharge. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of pharmacy dispensing and electronic health records, of older adults in a home care system and with palliative care needs according to the screening with the NECPAL tool or the PROFUND and/or PALIAR indexes. Dispensed medications during 180 days after admission to home care were analyzed. Medications were classified as potentially inappropriate according to the LESS-CHRON criteria. RESULTS: We included 176 patients, mean age 87.4 years, 67% were women; 73% were pluripathologic patients and 22% had one chronic progressive disease. Mortality at 6 months was 73%. Median frequency of dispensed medications per patient was 9.1 (IQR = 4-9.7). The frequency of potentially inappropriate medication dispensation among patients was 87%, mainly antihypertensives, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. CONCLUSION: This study observed that dispensation of potentially inappropriate medication among older adults with palliative care needs and home care services is very high. This emphasizes the need for effective patient-centered interventions to prevent inadequate prescription and stimulate de-prescription.

Introducción: Los adultos mayores con enfermedades crónicas avanzadas y necesidad de cuidados paliativos están más expuestos a la polifarmacia y a consumir medicación potencialmente inapropiada, la cual genera un alto riesgo de eventos adversos y alteración de la calidad de vida. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la frecuencia de consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada de adultos mayores con necesidad de cuidados paliativos que ingresaron a cuidados domiciliarios luego de una hospitalización. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal observacional de registros de dispensación e historias clínicas electrónicas, de adultos mayores en un sistema de cuidados domiciliarios y con necesidades de cuidados paliativos según el rastreo con la herramienta NECPAL, los índices PROFUND y/o PALIAR. Se analizó el consumo de fármacos durante los 180 días posteriores al ingreso a cuidados domiciliarios. Se clasificaron los fármacos como potencialmente inapropiados según criterios de LESS-CHRON. Resultados: Se incluyeron 176 pacientes, edad promedio 87.4 años, 67% mujeres; 78% eran pluripatológicos y 22% presentaban una enfermedad única crónica progresiva. La mortalidad a los 6 meses fue 73%. La mediana de consumo de fármacos por paciente fue 9.1 (RIC = 4-9.7). El 87% consumía medicación potencialmente inapropiada, principalmente antihipertensivos, benzodiacepinas y antipsicóticos. Conclusión: Este estudio observó que los adultos mayores, con necesidad de cuidados paliativos en cuidados domiciliarios, tienen un alto consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada. Esto refuerza la necesidad de implementar intervenciones efectivas centradas en el paciente, para prevenir la prescripción inadecuada y estimular la de-prescripción.

Use of potentially inappropriate medications and medications of concern in older adults with multiple myeloma / Utilização de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados e medicamentos que requerem cautela em idosos com mieloma múltiplo

Objetivo: Analisar o uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPIs) e o uso de medicamentos usados em terapia de suporte que requerem cautela em idosos com câncer (MTSRCICs), determinando os fatores associados. Visou-se também determinar a concordância entre os critérios explícitos empregados na identificação de MPI. Metodologia: Estudo transversal com indivíduos com mieloma múltiplo (MM), idade ≥ 60 anos em tratamento ambulatorial. Os MPI foram identificados de acordo com os critérios AGS Beers 2019, PRISCUS 2.0 e o Consenso Brasileiro de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados (CBMPI). Os MTSRCIC foram definidos de acordo com a National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Os fatores associados ao uso de MPI e MTSRCIC foram identificados por regressão logística múltipla. O grau de concordância entre os três critérios explícitos empregados no estudo foi mensurado pelo coeficiente kappa Cohen. Resultados: As frequências de MPI foram 52,29% (AGS Beers 2019), 62,74% (CBMPI), 65,36% (PRISCUS 2.0) e 52,29% (MTSRCICs). As concordâncias entre AGS Beers 2019 com PRISCUS 2,0 e com CBMPI foram altas, enquanto a concordância entre CBMPI e PRISCUS 2.0 foi excelente. No modelo final de regressão logística polifarmácia foi associada positivamente ao uso de MPI por idosos para os três critérios explícitos utilizados, além de associado à utilização de MTSRCICs. Conclusões: A frequência do uso de MPI e de MTSRCIC foi elevada. A concordância em relação ao uso de MPI entre os critérios AGS Beers 2019, CBMPI e PRISCUS 2.0 foi alta ou excelente. A polifarmácia apresentou associação independente e positiva com uso de MPIs e de MTSRCICs por pacientes idosos com MM. (AU)

Objectives: To analyze the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and medications used in supportive therapy that require caution in older adults with cancer, in addition to determining associated factors the agreement between criteria sets used to identify PIMs. Methods: This cross-sectional study included individuals with multiple myeloma aged ≥ 60 years who were undergoing outpatient treatment. PIMs were identified according to American Geriatric Society Beers 2019, PRISCUS 2.0, and Brazilian Consensus on Potentially Inappropriate Medicines criteria. Medications of concern were defined according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Factors associated with the use of PIMs and medications of concern were identified using multiple logistic regression. The degree of agreement between the 3 criteria sets was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: The frequency of PIM use was 52.29% according to American Geriatric Society Beers criteria, 62.74% according to Brazilian Consensus criteria, and 65.36% according to PRISCUS criteria, while 52.29% of the patients were using medications of concern. Agreement between American Geriatric Society Beers, PRISCUS, and Brazilian Consensus criteria was high, while it was excellent between Brazilian Consensus and PRISCUS criteria. In the final logistic regression model, polypharmacy was associated with PIM use according to each criteria set, as well as the use of medications of concern. Conclusions: The frequency of PIMs and medications of concern was high. Agreement about PIM use between the American Geriatric Society Beers, Brazilian Consensus, and PRISCUS criteria was high or excellent. There was an independent association between polypharmacy and the use of PIMs and medications of concern by older patients with multiple myeloma. (AU)

Using a mobile application to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing for older Brazilian adults in primary care: a triple-blind randomised clinical trial.

BACKGOUND: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has been evaluated in several countries, and several strategies have been devised for deprescribing drugs in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile application in reducing PIP for older adults in primary care facilities in Brazil. METHODS: This randomised, triple-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted in 22 public primary care facilities in Brazil. During the intervention phase, the general practitioners (GPs) were randomly allocated to the intervention (MPI Brasil app provides information about PIP, therapeutic alternatives and deprescribing) or control (MedSUS app provides general information about medications) group. All GPs were trained on the Clinical Decision-Making Process and how to access an Evidence-Based Health website. The GPs received an Android tablet with an installed mobile application depending on their allocated group, which they used when caring for older patients over at least 3 months. At the end of this period, a sample of older patients aged ≥ 60 years who had been awaiting medical consultation by the participating GPs were interviewed and their prescriptions analysed. The primary outcome was the frequency of PIP in and between the groups. RESULTS: Among 53 GPs who were administered the baseline survey, 14 were included in the clinical trial. At baseline, 146 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 37.7% (55/146), in the intervention group was 40.6% (28/69), and in the control group was 35.1% (27/77). After the intervention, 284 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 31.7% (90/284), in the intervention group was 32.2% (46/143), and in the control group was 31.2% (44/141) (RR: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76-1.76). In the within-group analysis, the PIP reduced from before to after the intervention in both groups-more significantly in the intervention than in the control group (p < 0.001). In the stratified analysis of PIP frequency by GPs, there was a relative risk reduction in 86% (6/7) of GPs in the intervention group compared to 71% (5/7) in the control group. CONCLUSION: We found that the MPI Brasil app effectively reduced PIP, suggesting that it may be useful to incorporate this tool into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02918643). First registration on 22/09/2016.

Polifarmácia, medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados e a vulnerabilidade de pessoas idosas / Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, and the vulnerability of older adults

Resumo Objetivo Analisar a frequência de polifarmácia e prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) segundo os Critérios de Beers e CBMPI em pessoas idosas com vulnerabilidade clínico-funcional. Método Trata-se de um estudo transversal onde analisou-se os prontuários de 496 participantes com 60 anos ou mais, atendidos em primeira consulta em uma Policlínica Gerontológica. Os dados sociodemográficos, medicamentos, e o Índice de Vulnerabilidade Clínico Funcional 20 (IVCF-20) e quedas foram extraídos dos prontuários. A polifarmácia foi definida como o uso simultâneo de cinco ou mais medicamentos. Os participantes foram classificados em três grupos: robusto, em risco e vulnerável. Resultados A análise demonstrou que 69 (13,91%) dos participantes faziam uso de polifarmácia. Entre os usuários de polifarmácia, 40 (57,97%) faziam uso de pelo menos um MPI. Os MPIs mais encontrados foram a glibenclamida e o omeprazol, respectivamente. Pessoas idosas com vulnerabilidade apresentaram um risco três vezes maior de apresentar polifarmácia (RP 3,59; IC95% 2,109-6,092). Conclusão O uso de polifarmácia e MPI neste estudo estavam associados à vulnerabilidade da pessoa idosa, reforçando a necessidade de avaliação criteriosa de prescrições medicamentosas para essa população.

Abstract Objective To analyze the frequency of polypharmacy and the prescription of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM) according to the Beers Criteria and CBMPI in older adults with clinical-functional vulnerability. Method This is a cross-sectional study where the medical records of 496 participants aged 60 and older, seen in their first appointment at a Gerontological Polyclinic, were analyzed. Sociodemographic data, medications, the Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index-20 (IVCF-20), and falls were extracted from the medical records. Polypharmacy was defined as the simultaneous use of five or more medications. Participants were classified into three groups: robust, at risk, and vulnerable. Results The analysis revealed that 69 (13.91%) participants were using polypharmacy. Among polypharmacy users, 40 (57.97%) were using at least one PIM. The most commonly found PIM were glibenclamide and omeprazole, respectively. Older adults with vulnerability were three times more likely to have polypharmacy (OR 3.59; 95% CI 2.109-6.092). Conclusion The use of polypharmacy and PIM in this study was associated with the vulnerability of older adults, emphasizing the need for a thorough evaluation of medication prescriptions for this population.

Potentially inappropriate medications with older people in intensive care and associated factors: a historic cohort study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in critical care units remains limited, especially in terms of the factors associated with their use. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and factors associated with PIMs use in intensive care units. DESIGN AND SETTING: Historical cohort study was conducted in a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 314 patients aged ≥ 60 years who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. The dates were extracted from a "Patient Safety Project" database. A Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess which factors were associated with PIMs. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: According to Beers' criteria, 12.8% of the identified drugs were considered inappropriate for the elderly population. The incidence rate of PIMs use was 45.8%. The most frequently used PIMs were metoclopramide, insulin, antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and benzodiazepines. Factors associated with PIMs use were the number of medications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17), length of hospital stay (OR = 1.07), and excessive potential drug interactions (OR = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the older adults in ICUs received PIM. Patients taking PIMs had a longer length of stay in the ICU, higher numbers of medications, and higher numbers of potential drug interactions. In ICUs, the use of explicit methods combined with clinical judgment can contribute to the safety and quality of medication prescriptions.

Factors associated with potentially inappropriate medications in elderly with multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly with cancer often have multimorbidity, which determines a higher risk of polypharmacy. This is related to negative clinical results such as adverse drug reaction and emergence service visits. Furthermore, polypharmacy increases the risk of using potentially inappropriate medications. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of potentially inappropriate medication in elderly with multiple myeloma and associated factors. METHODS: The study was conducted with older adults with multiple myeloma treated at outpatient oncology and hematology services in a southeastern Brazilian capital. Potentially inappropriate medications were classified using the American Geriatric Society/Beers 2019 Criteria. Variables were described using frequency and proportions, performing multiple logistic regression to identify factors associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three older adults with multiple myeloma were included, with a median age of 70.9 years. The median number of medications was 8, and 63% of patients used polypharmacy. More than half (54%) of the patients used potentially inappropriate medications, and proton pump inhibitors (46%) and benzodiazepines (8%) were the most employed therapeutic classes. Older adults who used potentially inappropriate medications differed from those who did not use them in the following characteristics: income up to three minimum wages, higher schooling level, private service, multimorbidity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, depression, adverse event, and polypharmacy. Higher schooling levels and polypharmacy were independently associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate medication use was high in patients with multiple myeloma studied. The use of polypharmacy and higher schooling levels were independently and positively associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications.

Worldwide Prevalence of Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The present study has compiled the prevalence of polypharmacy worldwide and assessed the prevalence of polypharmacy in different populations, including community-dwelling individuals, hospitalized patients, and institutionalized patients. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted and reported according to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scielo, was performed in March 2021 without any date and language restrictions. Combinations of the following keywords were used for the search strategy: polypharmacy OR multiple medications OR multiple medicines OR multiple drug AND prevalence. Based on the search and inclusion criteria, two hundred and eight studies (73,076,167 individuals) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. It was observed that there is a wide variation in the prevalence of polypharmacy between studies. RESULTS: The prevalence of polypharmacy was found to be 30.2%, 61.7%, and 56.9% for community-dwelling individuals, hospitalized patients, and institutionalized patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the analyses, this systematic review has demonstrated a wide variation in the prevalence of polypharmacy between studies and countries and a high prevalence of polypharmacy in institutionalized and hospitalized patients.

Tools to reduce prescribing errors of psychotropic drugs in older adults / Herramientas para reducir errores de prescripción de psicofármacos en los adultos mayores.

Introduction: Inappropriate prescribing is a major problem in psychiatric care in older adults. Factors such as the high proportion of older people with a high prevalence of mental disorders, the physiological changes typical of aging, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, the lack of evidence in treatment guidelines for this population, the degree of professional ignorance; give rise to the propensity to make prescription errors of various kinds. Objective: To review and summarize the available prescription tools that can provide support to improve prescription practices in psychopharmacology of the elderly. Method: A bibliographic review of the tools to reduce prescription errors in older adults was carried out: pharmacological reconciliation, interaction check, prevention, detection and reversal of prescription cascades and tools with explicit and implicit criteria (MAI, Beers, STOPP/START, FORTA, IFAsPIAM). Results: A clipping was made that groups the recommendations in the field of psychopharmacology. Conclusions: As there are no specific tools to improve practices in geriatric psychopharmacology, a compendium of its recommendations can be of orientation to the psychiatrist of older adults.

Introducción: La prescripción inapropiada es un problema importante de atención psiquiátrica en adultos mayores. Factores tales como la alta proporción de personas mayores con alta prevalencia de trastornos mentales, los cambios fisiológicos propios del envejecimiento, la multimorbilidad, la polifarmacia, la falta de evidencia en guías de tratamiento para esta población, el grado de desconocimiento del profesional; dan lugar a la propensión a cometer errores de prescripción de varios tipos. Objetivo: Revisar y resumir las herramientas de prescripción disponibles que pueden proveer soporte para mejorar las prácticas de prescripción en psicofarmacología del adulto mayor. Método: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de las herramientas para reducir errores de prescripción en adultos mayores: reconciliación farmacológica, chequeo de interacciones, prevención, detección y reversión de cascadas de prescripción y herramientas con criterios explícitos e implícitos (Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), Beers, Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) / Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START), FORTA (Fit for TheAged), IFAsPIAM (Ingredientes Farmacéuticos Activos Potencialmente Inapropiados en Adultos Mayores). Resultados: Se confeccionó un recorte que agrupa las recomendaciones en el ámbito de la psicofarmacología. Conclusiones: Al no existir herramientas específicas para mejorar las prácticas en psicofarmacología geriátrica, un compendio de sus recomendaciones puede resultar de orientación al psiquiatra de adultos mayores.

Polifarmacia y prescripción de medicamentos potencialmente no apropiados en adultos mayores hospitalizados

Introducción: las prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas en ancianos es un hecho común, tanto en el ámbito comunitario como hospitalario, dada su frecuencia elevada de comorbilidad grave y polifarmacia, y conlleva importantes repercusiones clínicas y económicas. Objetivo: determinar la prevalencia de polifarmacia y de prescripción de medicamentos potencialmente no apropiados en adultos mayores. Métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico transversal, de series de casos, en adultos mayores hospitalizados en el hogar de ancianos "Lidia Doce Sánchez" de Bayamo entre 1ro de septiembre de 2018 al 1ro de septiembre de 2019. La información se obtuvo del análisis de las historias clínicas y la aplicación de los criterios de STOPP/START. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante estadística descriptiva, se utilizaron pruebas de contrastación de hipótesis y se determinó la razón de prevalencia para determinar los factores asociados. Resultados: fueron frecuentes los pacientes con edades iguales o superiores a 75 años; del sexo masculino; con grado de instrucción primaria; con estado civil soltero y desnutrido. El promedio de comorbilidades por paciente fue de 4,2 ± 2,5; encontrándose como las principales afecciones las enfermedades cardiovasculares. La polifarmacia fue frecuente. La relación de riesgo frente a las potenciales prescripciones inadecuadas de medicamentos es con la edad avanzada, nivel de instrucción baja, comorbilidad, malnutrición y polimedicación. Las potenciales omisiones en la prescripción relacionan con la edad avanzada. Las potenciales interacciones medicamentosas aumentan su probabilidad de presentación con edad avanzada, un nivel bajo de instrucción, la desnutrición, la comorbilidad y la polimedicación. Conclusiones: se constató elevada polifarmacia y prescripción de medicamentos potencialmente no apropiados en los adultos mayores.

Introduction: potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly is a common occurrence, both in the community and hospital settings, given its high frequency of severe comorbidity and polypharmacy, and has significant clinical and economic repercussions. Objective: to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications in older adults. Methods: a cross-sectional analytical study of case series was carried out in older adults hospitalized in the "Lidia Doce Sánchez" nursing home in Bayamo between September 1, 2018 and September 1, 2019. The information was obtained from the analysis of clinical records and the application of the STOPP/START criteria. The analysis of the data was carried out through descriptive statistics, hypothesis contrast tests were used and the prevalence ratio was determined to determine the associated factors. Results: patients with ages equal to or greater than 75 years were frequent; of the male sex; with a primary education degree; with single marital status and malnourished. The average number of comorbidities per patient was 4.2 ± 2.5; being found as the main affections cardiovascular diseases. Polypharmacy was frequent. The risk relationship against potential inappropriate drug prescriptions is with advanced age, low level of education, comorbidity, malnutrition and polypharmacy. The potential omissions in the prescription are related to advanced age. Potential drug interactions increase the probability of presentation with advanced age, low level of education, malnutrition, comorbidity and polypharmacy. Conclusions: high polypharmacy and prescription of potentially inappropriate medications were found in older adults.

Introdução: prescrições potencialmente inadequadas em idosos é uma ocorrência comum, tanto na comunidade quanto no hospital, dada a sua alta frequência de comorbidades graves e polifarmácia, e acarreta importantes repercussões clínicas e econômicas. Objetivo: determinar a prevalência de polifarmácia e prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados em idosos. Métodos: foi realizado um estudo transversal analítico de série de casos em idosos hospitalizados no lar de idosos "Lidia Doce Sánchez", em Bayamo, entre 1º de setembro de 2018 e 1º de setembro de 2019. As informações foram obtidas a partir da análise dos prontuários e da aplicação dos critérios STOPP/START. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de estatística descritiva, teste de hipóteses e razão de prevalência foi determinada para determinar os fatores associados. Resultados: pacientes com 75 anos ou mais foram frequentes; macho; com o ensino fundamental; com estado civil solteiro e desnutrido. O número médio de comorbidades por paciente foi de 4,2 ± 2,5; sendo encontradas como principais afecções as doenças cardiovasculares. A polifarmácia era frequente. A razão de risco para potenciais prescrições inadequadas de medicamentos é com idade avançada, baixa escolaridade, comorbidade, desnutrição e polimedicação. As possíveis omissões na prescrição referem-se à idade avançada. Potenciais interações medicamentosas aumentam sua probabilidade de se apresentar com idade avançada, baixo nível de escolaridade, desnutrição, comorbidade e polimedicação. Conclusões: alta polifarmácia e prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados foram encontrados em idosos.

Prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos: um estudo na Atenção Primária à Saúde / Prescription of potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly: a study in Primary Health Care

Resumo Os idosos são vulneráveis aos riscos do uso de medicamentos, principalmente daqueles considerados potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) em que os riscos superam os benefícios. O estudo buscou avaliar os MPI prescritos na Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS) e seus fatores associados. Realizou-se um estudo transversal, analítico, de março a dezembro de 2019, na APS em Campina Grande, Paraíba, através de entrevistas com 458 idosos. As variáveis independentes abrangeram características socioeconômicas, condição de saúde e utilização de medicamentos e o desfecho foi medicamento classificado como MPI pelo Consenso Brasileiro de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados. Verificou-se a prescrição de pelo menos um MPI para 44,8% dos idosos e a maioria de atuação no Sistema Nervoso Central (54,4%). No modelo ajustado, depressão (RP=2,01; IC95% 1,59-2,55), utilizar outros medicamentos além dos prescritos (RP=1,36; IC95% 1,08-1,72) e polifarmácia (RP=1,80; IC95% 1,40-2,33) permaneceram como fator associado e autorreferir ser portador de hipertensão arterial sistêmica tornou-se fator de proteção (RP=0,65; IC95% 0,49-0,87). Evidencia-se necessidade de ações que qualifiquem o uso de medicamentos por idosos, de modo a garantir acesso aliado à segurança.

Abstract The elderly population is vulnerable to the risks of the use of medications, especially those considered potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), in which the risks outweigh the benefits. The study sought to evaluate the PIMs prescribed in Primary Health Care (PHC) and associated factors. A cross-sectional, analytical study was carried out from March to December 2019 in PHC in Campina Grande, Paraíba, through interviews with 458 elderly individuals. The independent variables included socioeconomic characteristics, health status and the use of medications, and the outcome was classified as PIM by the Brazilian Consensus on Potentially Inappropriate Medications. There was a prescription of at least one PIM for 44.8% of the elderly and the majority affecting the Central Nervous System (54.4%). In the adjusted model, depression (PR=2.01; 95%CI 1.59-2.55), using other medications in addition to those prescribed (PR=1.36; 95%CI 1.08-1.72) and polypharmacy (PR=1.80; 95%CI 1.40-2.33) remained an associated factor, and self-reporting systemic arterial hypertension became a protective factor (PR=0.65; 95%CI 0.49-0.87). This reveals the need for actions to monitor closely the use of PIMs by the elderly to ensure access in conjunction with safety.

Physician and patient-related factors associated with inappropriate prescribing to older patients within primary care: a cross-sectional study in Brazil

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Physician and patient-related characteristics can influence prescription of medications to older patients within primary healthcare. Use of Brazilian criteria may indicate the real prevalence of prescription of potentially inappropriate medications to this population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prescription of potentially inappropriate medications to older patients within primary care and identify patient-related and prescribing physician-related factors. DESIGN AND SETTING: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 22 public primary care facilities in Brazil, among older people (≥ 60 years) who were waiting for medical consultations. METHODS: Interviews were conducted before and after the medical consultations. If the patient received a medical prescription at the consultation, all the drugs prescribed and the physician's medical council registration number were recorded. Prevalence ratios were estimated to ascertain the magnitude of prescription of potentially inappropriate medications, along with patient and physician-related factors associated with such prescription. RESULTS: In total, 417 older patients were included; 45.3% had received ≥ 1 potentially inappropriate medication, and 86.8% out of 53 physicians involved had prescribed ≥ 1 potentially inappropriate medication. The strongest patient-related factor associated with higher prevalence of prescription of potentially inappropriate medications was polypharmacy. Among physician-related factors, the number of patients attended, number of prescriptions and length of medical practice < 10 years were positively associated with prescription of potentially inappropriate medications. CONCLUSIONS: High prevalence of prescription of potentially inappropriate medications was observed. Physician-related characteristics can influence prescription of medications to older people within primary healthcare. This suggests that there is a need for interventions among all physicians, especially younger physicians.

Medicamentos potecialmente inapropriados para idosos: da seleção à prescrição na atenção primária à saúde / Potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly: from selection to prescription in primary health care

O envelhecimento populacional é uma realidade crescente e os idosos apresentam a necessidade de utilização de medicamentos, muitas vezes expondo-os a riscos. Os medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) para idosos são aqueles em que os riscos superam os benefícios. Os medicamentos essenciais devem atender as necessidades prioritárias de saúde de uma população e a prescrição de medicamentos é considerada um dos aspectos determinantes para o uso. O objetivo do estudo foi analisar os medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos, desde a seleção de medicamentos essenciais à prescrição na Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS). Foi realizado um estudo descritivo e analítico com abordagem qualitativa e quantitativa, de março a dezembro de 2019, na APS em Campina Grande, PB. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida através da triangulação de métodos: 1) pesquisa documental, que analisou os medicamentos das Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais (RENAME nas edições 2010 e 2020 de acordo com as listas AGS/Beers e as Listas de Medicamentos Essenciais (LME) da Organização Mundial de Saúde vigentes à época; 2) estudo transversal, realizado através de entrevistas com 458 idosos usuários de 71 unidades básicas de saúde. As variáveis independentes abrangeram características demográficas e socioeconômicas, condição de saúde e utilização de medicamentos e a variável dependente foi o medicamento prescrito ser classificado como inapropriado pelo Consenso Brasileiro de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriado. Foi feita análise descritiva dos dados e regressão de Poisson; e, 3) estudo de caso, realizado através de entrevistas com 10 prescritores da APS para conhecer a percepção desses profissionais sobre a prática prescritiva para idosos. Foram prescritos 1449 medicamentos e 244 MPI (16,8%), dos quais 91,6% e 70,5% estavam elencados na RENAME, respectivamente. A maioria dos MPI atuavam no Sistema Nervoso Central (54,4%) e trato alimentar e metabolismo (20,1%). Entre os principais MPI, observou-se ausência de alternativas terapêuticas mais seguras disponíveis na RENAME. No estudo transversal, identificou-se uma prevalência de prescrição de pelo menos um MPI em 44,8% (IC95% 40,2-49,3) dos idosos. No modelo ajustado, depressão (RP=2,01; IC95% 1,59-2,55), utilizar outros medicamentos além dos prescritos (RP=1,36; IC95% 1,08-1,72) e polifarmácia (RP=1,80; IC95% 1,40-2,33) permaneceram como fator associado ao uso de MPI e autorreferir ser portador de hipertensão arterial sistêmica tornou-se fator de proteção (RP=0,65; IC95% 0,49-0,87). Na análise qualitativa, emergiram duas categorias: 1) Abordagem dos prescritores no atendimento aos idosos na APS; e, 2) Uso de medicamentos por idosos: o olhar dos prescritores. Os médicos relataram promover atividades de prevenção, porém enfatizaram o tratamento das doenças crônicas prevalentes entre idosos. Também destacaram a polifarmácia e consideraram inadequada a utilização de benzodiazepínicos. Constatou-se desconhecimento dos médicos sobre as listas de medicamentos inapropriados. A medicalização dos idosos e a disponibilidade de medicamentos essenciais foram descritos como desafios. O estudo identificou uma alta ocorrência de prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos na Atenção Primária à Saúde em conformidade com a lista nacional de medicamentos essenciais e escassez de alternativas terapêuticas mais seguras para idosos. Evidencia-se necessidade de ações que busquem qualificar o acesso a medicamentos por idosos como a elaboração de uma lista de medicamentos específica ou a inserção de alternativas terapêuticas mais seguras para idosos na RENAME, juntamente com a capacitação dos profissionais prescritores e o acompanhamento dos idosos. Diante do envelhecimento da população brasileira, faz-se pertinente garantir acesso a medicamentos aliado à segurança dos idosos (AU).

Population aging is a growing reality, and the elderly need medications, which often expose them to risks. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in the elderly are those in which risks outweigh benefits. Essential medications must meet health needs of a population, and medication prescription is one determinant for its use. This study aimed to analyze PIM in the elderly from the selection of essential drugs to prescription in primary health care (PHC). A descriptive and analytical study with quali-quantitative approach was conducted in PHC in Campina Grande (PB) between March and December 2019. The study was developed triangulating methods: 1) documentary research, which analyzed medicines of the National Essential Medicines List (RENAME) in 2010 and 2020 editions according to AGS/Beers criteria and essential medicines lists (EML) of the World Health Organization; 2) crosssectional study, conducted using interviews with 458 elderly users of 71 basic health units. Independent variables were demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health condition, and use of medication, whereas the dependent variable was prescribed medication classified as inappropriate by the Brazilian Consensus on Potentially Inappropriate Medications. Descriptive data analysis and Poisson regression were performed; and 3) case study, using interviews conducted with 10 PHC prescribers to observe perception of these professionals regarding prescription for the elderly. One thousand four hundred and forty-nine medications and 244 PIM (16.8%) were prescribed; of these, 91.6% and 70.5% were listed in RENAME, respectively. Most PIM acted in the central nervous system (54.4%) and gastrointestinal tract and metabolism (20.1%). RENAME lacked safer therapeutic alternatives for main PIMs. In the cross-sectional study, at least one PIM was prescribed for 44.8% (95%CI 40.2 ˗ 49.3) of the elderly. In the adjusted model, depression (PR=2.01; 95%CI 1.59 ˗ 2.55), use of medication other than those prescribed (PR=1.36; 95%CI 1.08 ˗ 1.72), and polypharmacy (PR = 1.80; 95%CI 1.40 ˗ 2.33) were associated with PIM, whereas self-reported hypertension was a protective factor (PR=0.65; 95%CI 0.49 ˗ 0.87). Two categories emerged in the qualitative analysis: 1) approach of prescribers to assist the elderly in PHC and 2) use of medication by the elderly: view of prescribers. Doctors reported preventive activities but emphasized treatment of prevalent chronic diseases among the elderly. They also highlighted polypharmacy and considered benzodiazepines to be inappropriate. Doctors lacked knowledge about inappropriate medication lists. Medicalization of the elderly and availability of essential medication were described as challenges. PIMs were highly prescribed for the elderly in PHC according to the RENAME and safer therapeutic alternatives were absent. Actions to qualify access of the elderly to medication are needed, such as elaborating a specific list of medication, inserting safer therapeutic alternatives for the elderly in RENAME, training prescribers, and monitoring the elderly. Access to medication and safety of the elderly must be guaranteed because of aging of the Brazilian population (AU).

The comorbidity conditions and polypharmacy in elderly patients with mental illness in a middle income country: a cross-sectional study⋆.

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders increase the risk factor for developing physical comorbidity conditions, such as cardiometabolic diseases. There is a high prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in the elderly population which hampers clinical response. Studies have shown that this positive correlation between the aging process and enhancement of physical comorbidities is especially high among older adults who live in low or middle income countries. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between physical disease comorbidities and polypharmacy in older adults with a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or major depressive disorder (MDD), living in a middle income country. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of community-dwelling elderly individuals who are cognitively healthy and those with AD, MCI, or MDD. The severity scale of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated to classify the severity of comorbidity condition. Logistic regression model (unadjusted and adjusted for age) were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for cardiometabolic comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and overweight), and polypharmacy. RESULTS: Although there was not an increased risk of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity among the groups, elderly people with mental disorders presented higher odds for polypharmacy condition. Polypharmacy was significantly higher for all groups in comparison with cognitively healthy participants: AD (OR 22.00, 95 % CI 6.11-79.11), MDD (OR 14.73, 95 % CI 3.69-58.75) and MCI (OR 10.31, 95 % CI 2.44-43.59). Elderly patients with AD presented more severe comorbidities and higher risks for dyslipidemia. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with depression, dementia and mild cognitive impairment have considerably higher odds for polypharmacy. People with dementia also have greater comorbidity severity than those who are cognitively healthy. In middle income countries, there is an urgent need to focus on promoting age-appropriate health approaches for the elderly with mental illness to prevent the development of aggravated cardiometabolic conditions and polypharmacy.

Cloroquina e hidroxicloroquina: medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados a idosos? / Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: potentially inappropriate medications for older adults?

INTRODUÇÃO: Medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados a idosos (MPII) provocam mais efeitos adversos do que benefícios. Os critérios de Beers (CB) da American Geriatrics Society 2019 (CB2019) consideraram cinco situações clínicas como MPII. A análise de medicamentos por essas situações pode auxiliar na prescrição a idosos? Procurando exemplo prático dessa questão, optou-se por análise de fármacos atualmente questionados quanto ao seu uso seguro em idosos. OBJETIVO: Verificar se cloroquina e hidroxicloroquina se enquadram como MPII e se essa análise é aplicável clinicamente. METODOLOGIA: Sistematizou-se o objetivo pelas cinco situações clínicas definidas como MPII pelos CB2019. RESULTADOS: Ambos os fármacos preenchem respectivamente quatro (cloroquina) e cinco (hidroxicloroquina) dessas situações clínicas. Esta análise permitiu a provável definição de MPII para esses medicamentos de forma simples, por intermédio de breve análise de literatura acessível. CONCLUSÃO: Cloroquina e hidroxicloroquina podem ser considerados MPII. Espera-se replicar essa análise para outros medicamentos e reduzir iatrogenias em idosos.

INTRODUCTION: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older adults cause more adverse effects than benefits. The 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria (2019BC) considered five clinical situations as PIM use in older adults. Can drug analysis, according to these situations, assist in the act of making prescriptions for older people? Seeking a practical example for this question, we assessed drugs currently questioned as to their safe use among older people. OBJECTIVE: To check if chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine fit the PIM criteria for older adults and whether this analysis is clinically applicable. METHODS: We systematized the objective based on the five clinical situations defined as PIM use in older adults by the 2019BC. RESULTS: Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine fulfill, respectively, four and five of these clinical situations. This evaluation allowed the likely definition of these drugs as PIMs for older adults in a simple way, based on a brief analysis of the available literature. CONCLUSION: Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine may be considered PIMs for older adults. We expect that this analysis can be replicated with other drugs and reduce iatrogenesis in older people.

Polypharmacy among adult and older adult users of primary care services delivered through the Unified Health System in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) among adults and to analyze related factors. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 1,159 interviewees distributed across 104 cities and 253 primary healthcare services delivered through the Brazilian Unified Health System. Polypharmacy-related factors were identified using logistic regression model. RESULTS: 949 (81.8%) interviewees were using at least one medication and were included in this analysis. The prevalence of polypharmacy among them was 13.7% (95%CI:11.7-16.0%) in the general population and 33.3%(95%CI:26.1-41.4%) in older adults(≥65 years). Polypharmacy was positively associated with age (45 to 64 years, OR=2.02; 95%CI:1.03-3.94; ≥65 years, OR=4.17; 95%CI:1.92-9.17) and the following chronic diseases: stroke (OR=4.20; 95%CI:1.53-11.55); diabetes mellitus (OR=4.03; 95%CI:2.43-6.68); heart disease (OR=3.18; 95%CI:1.92-5.29); depression (OR=2.85; 95%CI:1.80-4.53); hypertension (OR=2.13; 95%CI:1.17-3.86); and dyslipidemia (OR=1.73; 95%CI:1.07-2.80). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that polypharmacy is a real concern in primary health care and affects older and middle-aged adults alike. Groups of patients that are more likely to experience polypharmacy were identified. Our findings emphasize the relevance of an appropriate approach to polypharmacy driven by aging and multimorbidity.

Uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados em idosos institucionalizados: prevalência e fatores associados / Use of potentially inappropriate medications in institutionalized elderly: prevalence and associated factors

Resumo Este trabalho teve como objetivo verificar a prevalência do uso de medicamento potencialmente inapropriado (MPI) para idosos residentes em Instituições de Longa Permanência para Idosos (ILPI), assim como os tipos de medicamentos e seus fatores associados. Trata-se de estudo transversal realizado em 10 ILPI da cidade do Natal, entre outubro e dezembro de 2013. Os medicamentos inapropriados foram classificados de acordo com os Critérios de Beers da American Geriatric Society 2015. Foram analisadas variáveis sociodemográficas, relacionadas à ILPI e às condições de saúde. Para as análises univariada e multivariada entre a variável principal (uso de MPI) e as demais foi utilizada a regressão de Poisson. A amostra foi composta por 321 idosos e, destes, 304 utilizavam medicamentos. A prevalência de uso de MPI foi de 54,6% (IC 95%: 48,9-60,2) e no modelo final esteve associada à polifarmácia e à demência. As classes terapêuticas de MPI mais identificadas foram antipsicóticos e benzodiazepínicos. O estudo revelou alta prevalência de MPI entre os idosos das ILPI, configurando a necessidade de adoção de indicadores do uso destes medicamentos e a implantação de estratégias que tornem a farmacoterapia mais segura e adequada aos idosos.

Abstract This study aimed to verify the prevalence of the use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM) for elderly living in Long-Term Care Institutions for the Elderly (LTCIE), as well as the types of medications and their associated factors. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in 10 LTCIEs in the city of Natal in the period October-December 2013. Potentially inappropriate medications were classified according to the 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults - 2015. Sociodemographic, LTCIE-related and health-related variables were considered. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed between the primary variable (PIM use) and the independent variables using Poisson regression. The sample consisted of 321 older people, of whom 304 used medications. The prevalence of PIM use was 54.6% (95% CI: 48.9-60.2) and was associated with polypharmacy and dementia in the final model. The most common PIMs were antipsychotics and benzodiazepines. The study revealed a high prevalence of PIM use among the elderly of the LTCIEs, evidencing the need to adopt indicators on the use of these drugs and the implementation of strategies that make drug therapy safer and more adequate for older adults.

Pain and Inflammation Management in Older Adults: A Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Their Alternative Therapies.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM) list and alternative therapies for treatment of pain and inflammation in older people adapted to the Brazilian context. Methods: A preliminary PIM list suitable for the Brazilian market was developed on the basis of three published international PIM lists [Beers 2015, Screening Tool of Older People's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions - 2015, European Union (7) PIM list]. We used the modified Delphi technique (two-round) to validate concerns of use and alternative therapies related to PIM for treatment of pain and inflammation in older adults ≥65 years in Brazil. The panel involved nine Brazilian experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy. All items with mean Likert scale score ≥4.0 (agree) and the lower limit of 95% confidence interval ≥4.0 were considered validated in this study. Results: At the end of the consensus process, 94 (65.3%) items of 144 were validated. In total, consensus was reached for 33/35 (94.3%) concerns about drugs that should be avoided in older patients regardless of diagnosis, for 22/23 (95.7%) concerns about drugs that should be avoided in older patients with specific conditions or diseases, for 11/23 (47.8%) with special considerations of use, and for 28/63 (44.4%) of therapeutic alternatives. Conclusion: Although these criteria are not designed to replace clinical judgement, PIM and alternative therapies lists can be useful to inform prescribers, pharmacists, and health care planners and may serve as a starting point for safe and effective use of medications in older people.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications in older adults in Argentina using Beers criteria and the IFAsPIAM List.

Background Medications in which the risk of adverse events exceeds the expectations of clinical benefits are called potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). To identify the use of PIMs in elderly patients, the most commonly used tool are the Beers criteria, developed for the population of the United States. Recently, a consensus panel of Argentine experts developed the first Latin American tool, called the IFAsPIAM List. Objective The present study aimed to identify PIM prescriptions in elderly outpatients, to estimate the prevalence of PIMs, and to evaluate their possible relation with polypharmacy and gender and age of the patients. Also, we aimed to compare the results obtained by using the Beers criteria and the IFAsPIAM List. Setting Ten community pharmacies of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between February and September 2015. Data were acquired from 56,952 prescriptions prescribed to 2231 patients aged 65 years old or older. To detect the use of PIMs, we used two tools: the Beers criteria and the IFAsPIAM List. Main outcome measure The prevalence of PIM use according to the Beers criteria and the IFAsPIAM List. Results The monthly average of medications dispensed per patient was 4.35 ± 2.18 and 42.27% of the patients presented major polypharmacy. The prevalence of PIMs was 72.75% according to the Beers criteria and 71.13% according to the IFAsPIAM List (Kappa coefficient k = 0.72), and was significantly higher in patients with major polypharmacy, older than 75 years old, and females. The most frequent PIMs prescribed were anxiolytics, analgesics and antipsychotics. Conclusions The IFAsPIAM List is an effective tool to evaluate the prescription of PIMs in the elderly. The results showed a high prevalence of PIMs with a multicausal origin and directly associated with polypharmacy. As clarified by the authors of the IFAsPIAM List, the criteria specified in the list do not substitute the clinical evaluation of each patient.