Loose fit versus press fit stems and risk for surgical reintervention following radial head arthroplasty: A US-based cohort study of 1575 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is performed with increasing frequency for reconstruction of comminuted radial head fractures. Implants can be categorized by stem design, either loose fit or press fit. Currently, the RHA literature does not suggest one implant type is superior to another based on revision and reoperation rates, although most RHA outcome studies have small numbers of patients with few events to detect a difference. This study evaluated the association between stem design and risk of revision and reoperation after RHA. METHODS: 1575 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary RHA within a US-based healthcare system were identified (2009-2021). Revision following the index RHA was the primary outcome of interest; ipsilateral reoperation was a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the risk of outcomes by loose versus press fit with the adjustment for race/ethnicity, ASA classification, region, surgeon RHA volume, and simultaneous ipsilateral extremity procedures. RESULTS: Of the 1575 RHA, 681 (43.2%) received a loose fit stem. The cumulative revision probability was 2.6% for loose fit and 3.5% for press fit. In adjusted analysis, we did not observe a difference in risk of revision (HR=0.78, 95% CI=0.41-1.46) or reoperation (HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.43-1.25). Additionally, there were no observed differences in risk of revision (HR=0.62, 95% CI=0.28-1.38) or reoperation (HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.48-1.71) in the patient subgroup who underwent additional procedures in the same extremity at the time of RHA. CONCLUSION: In this large multi-center cohort of 1575 primary RHA, we did not observe a difference in risk of revision or reoperation following RHA based upon stem design. The choice between using an implant with a loose or press fit stem may be based more on surgeon familiarity, implant availability and cost, and ease of use.

Early Aseptic Tibial Loosening Is a Concern with a Modern Two-Peg Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Design.

INTRODUCTION: While early generations of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had inferior outcomes compared to cemented TKA, modern cementless designs have offered excellent clinical results. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and early aseptic revision rates of a specific cementless TKA design featuring a two-pegged tibia to that of its cemented counterpart. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all cementless and cemented TKAs utilizing a single design performed at a single, high-volume academic center was performed. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained. All cases were performed between November 2018 and March 2022. A minimum one-year follow-up was required. Demographics, complications, and reoperation/revision data were collected. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were collected at one-year follow-up. Radiographic review was performed for cementless TKAs that were revised or had PROMs < 1 standard deviation (SD) ("poor performers") or had PROMs > 1 SD ("high performers") below or above the mean, respectively. RESULTS: There were 329 cementless and 349 cemented TKAs included. Mean follow-up was 1.9 years and 2.6 years for cementless and cemented cohorts, respectively. There were no statistical PROM differences between the two cohorts. There was no statistical difference in aseptic revision rates between the cohorts (4.0% cementless versus 1.7% cemented, P = 0.078); however, there was a higher rate of tibial aseptic loosening in the cementless cohort (2.7% cementless versus 0% cemented, P = 0.002). The mean time to revision for aseptic tibial loosening was 17.6 months. There was no statistical difference in radiolucencies between "poor performers" and "high performers." CONCLUSION: When compared to its cemented counterpart, the cementless TKA that was reintroduced in 2018 had similar one-year PROMs, but a higher rate of early tibial loosening (2.7 versus 0.0%, P = 0.002).

Prediction of intraoperative press-fit stability of the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using radiomics-based machine learning models.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative prediction of the acetabular cup press-fit stability in total hip arthroplasty is necessary for clinical decision-making. This study aims to establish and validate machine learning models to investigate the feasibility of predicting the intraoperative press-fit stability of the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: 226 patients who underwent primary THA from 2018 to 2022 in our hospital were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into press-fit stable or unstable groups according to the intraoperative pull-out test of the implanted cup. Then, they were randomly assigned to the training or test cohort in an 8:2 ratio. We used 3Dslicer software to segment the region of interest (ROI) of the patient's bilateral hip X-ray to extract radiomics features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used in our feature selection. Finally, four machine learning models were employed in this study, including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and XGBoost (XGB). Decision curve analysis (DCA), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the models were plotted. The area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated as well. The AUCs of the four models were compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: Twenty-seven valuable radiomics features were determined by dimensionality reduction and selection. Regarding to the DeLong test, the AUC of the XGB model was significantly different from those of the other three models. (p < 0.05). Among all models, the XGB model exhibited the best performance with an AUC of 0.823 (95 % CI: 0.711-0.919) in the test cohort and showed optimal clinical efficacy according to the DCA. CONCLUSION: Machine learning models based on X-ray radiomics can accurately predict the intraoperative press-fit stability of implanted cups preoperatively, providing surgeons with valuable information to lower the complication risk in THA.

Short- to midterm outcomes of 139 pyrocarbon monopolar radial head arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: The MoPyc radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is a monopolar implant with a pyrocarbon head that obtains rigid fixation via controlled expansion of the titanium stem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term to midterm outcomes of MoPyc RHA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2021, 139 MoPyc RHA were implanted in 139 patients with a RH fracture. The mean follow-up was 5.9 years ± 3.5 (range 1-16). Range of motion, mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, visual analog scale (VAS), radiographic outcome, and reason for failure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean MEP, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and VAS scores were 89.1 ± 2.2 (range, 45-100), 17.5 ± 16.7 (range, 0-78), and 0.8 ± 1.6 (range, 0-50), respectively. Stress shielding (SS) and osteolysis around the stem were identified in 92 (66%) and 20 (14%) patients. A total of 47 (29%) patients experienced at least 1 complication and 29 (21%) of them required re-intervention. Persistent stiffness (n = 12; 9%) was the most common complication. No painful loosening was noted. Osteolysis around the stem, presence of an autoexpanding stem, and overstuffing were associated with a lower MEPS and an increase in VAS (P < .05). SS was associated with an increase in MEPS (adjusted beta coefficients= 6.92; P < .001) and lower VAS (adjusted beta coefficients= -0.69; P = .016). The autoexpending stem increased the likelihood of SS after RHA (adjusted odds ratio = 1.49; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: A well-fixed MoPyc RHA provided satisfactory short to midterm outcomes, without painful loosening. However, the autoexpanding stem system was associated with poorer functional outcomes and increased the likelihood of SS.

Management of Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Current Concept Review.

Intraoperative acetabular fractures (IAFs), a complication seldomly encountered in total hip arthroplasty, are typically a result of the impact of insertion of a cementless press-fit cup. Factors that contribute to the risk of these types of fractures include poor bone quality, highly sclerotic bone, and the use of a press-fit cup that is excessively large. The approach to management of these fractures is dependent on when they are identified. Immediate stabilization measures should be implemented for management of fractures detected during surgery. When fractures are detected postoperatively, the decision regarding conservative treatment is dependent on the stability of the implant and the specific fracture pattern. In the majority of cases, effective treatment of an acetabular fracture detected intraoperatively can be administered using a multi-hole revision cup along with anchoring screws in the various regions of the acetabulum. Selection of plate osteosynthesis of the posterior column is recommended when there is a large posterior wall fragment or pelvic discontinuity. In cases where anatomical dimensions allow, cup-cage reconstruction may offer a promising alternative to a combined hip procedure. The number of reports addressing the management of IAFs is limited. This review focuses on outlining the strategies that are currently available for management of this seldomly encountered complication.

Patients with Osteoporosis Are at Higher Risk for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures and Aseptic Loosening Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This report provides an updated analysis for patients with osteoporosis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The comorbidities of alcohol abuse, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, and rheumatoid arthritis continue to be significant risk factors for periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFFx) and aseptic loosening in the population with osteoporosis. Patients with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometric (DEXA) scans were at risk for PPFFx regardless of femoral fixation method, and patients with DEXA scans with cementless fixation were at risk of aseptic loosening after THA. The patient population with severe osteoporosis may have higher risks for aseptic loosening and PPFFx than previously recognized.

Quasi-static mechanical evaluation of canine cementless total hip replacement broaches: effect of tooth design on broach and stem insertion.

BACKGROUND: Biomedtrix BFX® cementless total hip replacement (THR) requires the use of femoral broaches to prepare a press-fit envelope within the femur for subsequent stem insertion. Current broaches contain teeth that crush and remove cancellous bone; however, they are not particularly well-suited for broaching sclerotic (corticalized) cancellous bone. In this study, three tooth designs [Control, TG1 (additional V-grooves), TG2 (diamond tooth pattern)] were evaluated with a quasi-static testing protocol and polyurethane test blocks simulating normal and sclerotic bone. To mimic clinical broaching, a series of five sequential broach insertions were used to determine cumulative broaching energy (J) and peak loads during broach insertion. To determine the effect of broach tooth design on THR stem insertion, a BFX® stem was inserted into prepared test blocks and insertion and subsidence energy and peak loads were determined. RESULTS: Broach tooth design led to significant differences in broaching energy and peak broaching loads in test blocks of both densities. In low density test blocks, TG1 required the lowest cumulative broaching energy (10.76 ±0.29 J), followed by Control (12.18 ±1.20 J) and TG2 (16.66 ±0.78 J) broaches. In high density test blocks, TG1 required the lowest cumulative broaching energy (32.60 ±2.54 J) as compared to Control (33.25 ±2.16 J) and TG2 (59.97 ±3.07 J).  During stem insertion and subsidence testing, stem insertion energy for high density test blocks prepared with Control broaches was 14.53 ± 0.81 J, which was significantly lower than blocks prepared with TG1 (22.53 ± 1.04 J) or TG2 (19.38 ± 3.00 J) broaches. For stem subsidence testing in high density blocks, TG1 prepared blocks required the highest amount of energy to undergo subsidence (14.49 ± 0.49 J), which was significantly greater than test blocks prepared with Control (11.09 ±0.09 J) or TG2 (12.57 ± 0.81 J) broaches. CONCLUSIONS: The additional V-grooves in TG1 broaches demonstrated improved broaching performance while also generating press-fit envelopes that were more resistant to stem insertion and subsidence. TG1 broaches may prove useful in the clinical setting; however additional studies that more closely simulate clinical broach impaction are necessary prior to making widespread changes to THR broaches.

Effect of Press-Fit Size on Insertion Mechanics and Cartilage Viability in Human and Ovine Osteochondral Grafts.

OBJECTIVE: The osteochondral allograft procedure uses grafts constructed larger than the recipient site to stabilize the graft, in what is known as the press-fit technique. This research aims to characterize the relationships between press-fit size, insertion forces, and cell viability in ovine and human osteochondral tissue. DESIGN: Human (4 donors) and ovine (5 animals) articular joints were used to harvest osteochondral grafts (4.55 mm diameter, N = 33 Human, N = 35 Ovine) and create recipient sites with grafts constructed to achieve varying degrees of press fit (0.025-0.240 mm). Donor grafts were inserted into recipient sites while insertion forces were measured followed by quantification of chondrocyte viability and histological staining to evaluate the extracellular matrix. RESULTS: Both human and ovine tissues exhibited similar mechanical and cellular responses to changes in press-fit. Insertion forces (Human: 3-169 MPa, Ovine: 36-314 MPa) and cell viability (Human: 16%-89% live, Ovine: 2%-76% live) were correlated to press-fit size for both human (force: r = 0.539, viability: r = -0.729) and ovine (force: r = 0.655, viability: r = -0.714) tissues. In both species, a press-fit above 0.14 mm resulted in reduced cell viability below a level acceptable for transplantation, increased insertion forces, and reduced linear correlation to press-fit size compared to samples with a press-fit below 0.14 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing press-fit size required increased insertion forces and resulted in reduced cell viability. Ovine and human osteochondral tissues responded similarly to impact insertion and varying press-fit size, providing evidence for the use of the ovine model in allograft-related research.

Reconstruction of the Fully Edentulous Maxilla Using Sinus Grafts and Bone Expansion: A Retrospective Analysis of 50 Consecutive Cases.

A series of 50 cases involving reconstruction of the fully edentulous maxilla using sinus grafts, bone expansion, and classic crown and bridge to restore to normal contour, comfort, health, function, and esthetics is retrospectively analyzed using 25 years of follow-up data.

Radiographic and clinical comparisons between loose-fit and press-fit stems in monopolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures.

PURPOSE: Few clinical studies have compared the operative outcomes between loose- and press-fit stems in radial head arthroplasty (RHA). We aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of the two radial head implant concepts. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 32 patients (24 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 63.1 years who underwent RHA for comminuted radial head fractures were reviewed between 2005 and 2021. Seventeen patients underwent RHA with a loose-fit stem (L-group), whereas the remaining fifteen patients underwent RHA with a press-fit stem (P-group). The mean follow-up period was 40.1 ± 9.9 months, with the minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The radiographic findings were evaluated for periprosthetic osteolysis; furthermore, clinical outcomes were analyzed to measure the range of motion of the elbow. The rate of reoperations and prosthesis removal were also reviewed. RESULTS: The general characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. The rate of periprosthetic osteolysis was 17.6% in the L-group, whereas it was 53.3% in the P-group. The mean elbow flexions were 128° and 133° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The mean elbow extensions were -12° and -9° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The rate of reoperation was 23.5% in the L-group and 15.2% in the P-group. One patient in the L-group had the prosthesis removed because of surgical site infection, whereas one patient in the P-group had the prosthesis removed owing to painful loosening. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the clinical outcomes and reoperation rate were observed between the two radial head implant concepts in this study. However, osteolysis occurred more frequently in the P-group. Although patients with periprosthetic osteolysis are currently asymptomatic, they should be carefully followed up for the symptoms in the long term.

Optimized reamer geometry for controlled reaming of the proximal femur.

Preparation of the femoral proximal medullary cavity by reaming is essential for intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and hip revision arthroplasty. The use of reamers sometimes exerts high torsional forces on the bone. Design and direction of rotation of the reamer are potential influencing factors. The aim of this biomechanical study is to evaluate the best combination of a right- or left-cutting reamer with a clockwise- or counterclockwise-rotating insert in terms of preparation and safety. Right- and left-cutting reamers with conical design were each introduced into five synthetic femurs in both clockwise and counterclockwise rotation with constant feed force. A specially constructed test system was used for this series of tests, with which the respective intramedullary channel were reamed step by step. This was then used to determine the required torque. In addition, the feed rate measurement was analyzed using a modified digital caliper. The feed rates of the reamers with rotation in the same direction as the cutting direction were significantly increased compared to rotation in the opposite cutting direction (CCRLC vs. CCRRC 76.8 ± 9.0 mm/s vs. 25.2 ± 8.3 mm/s and CRRC vs. CRLC 54.3 ± 12.3 mm/s vs. 19.3 ± 0.6 mm/s; p < 0.01). In contrast, the mean torque during the reaming process was identical in all four groups. When preparing the proximal femoral medullary cavity, especially in cases with fragile bone structure, the available reamers should be introduced in opposite rotation to the cutting direction to achieve a more controllable feed of the reamer. Left-cutting reamers represent an alternative, using them in the usual clockwise-rotating technique to reduce the risk of complications during reaming.

The effect of coating characteristics on implant-bone interface mechanics.

Successful osseointegration of press-fit implants depends on the initial stability, often measured by the micromotions between the implant and bone. A good primary stability can be achieved by optimizing the compressive and frictional forces acting at the bone-implant interface. The frictional properties of the implant-bone interface, which depend on the roughness and porosity of the implant surface coating, can affect the primary stability. Several reversible (elastic) and non-reversible (permanent) deformation processes take place during frictional loading of the implant-bone interface. In case of a rough coating, the asperities of the implant surface are compressed into the bone leading to mechanical interlocking. To optimize fixation of orthopaedic implants it is crucial to understand these complex interactions between coating and bone. The objective of the current study was to gain more insight into the reversible and non-reversible processes acting at the implant-bone interface. Tribological experiments were performed with two types of porous coatings against human cadaveric bone. The results indicated that the coefficient of friction depended on the coating roughness (0.86, 0.95, and 0.45 for an Ra roughness of 41.2, 53.0, and a polished surface, respectively). Larger elastic and permanent displacements were found for the rougher coating, resulting in a lower interface stiffness. The experiments furthermore revealed that relative displacements of up to 35 µm can occur without sliding at the interface. These findings have implications for micromotion thresholds that currently are assumed for osseointegration, and suggest that bone ingrowth actually occurs in the absence of relative sliding at the implant-bone interface.

Cemented vs. press-fit humeral stems: a matched cohort analysis at a mean follow-up of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Although cementation of humeral stems has long been considered the gold standard for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), cementless, or press-fit, fixation offers a relatively cheaper and less demanding alternative, particularly in the setting of a revision procedure. However, this approach has been accompanied by concerns of implant loosening and high rates of radiolucency. In the present study, we performed a propensity-matched comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and cementless fixation techniques for aTSA. We hypothesized that cemented fixation of the humeral component would have significantly better implant survival while providing comparable functional outcomes at final follow-up. METHODS: This study was a retrospective comparison of 50 shoulders undergoing aTSA: 25 using cemented humeral fixation vs. 25 using press-fit humeral fixation. Patients in the 2 groups were propensity matched according to age, sex, and preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score. Primary outcome measures included range of motion (ROM) (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), patient-reported outcomes (ASES, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], visual analog scale [VAS]), and implant survival. RESULTS: At baseline, the 2 fixation groups were similar in regard to age, sex, body mass index, preoperative ASES score, and surgical indication. Mean follow-up was 11.7 ± 4.95 years in the cemented cohort and 9.13 ± 3.77 years in the press-fit cohort (P = .045). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements postoperatively in all included ROM and patient-reported outcomes. However, press-fit patients reported significantly better VAS, ASES, and SST scores. Mean VAS pain score was 1.1 ± 1.8 in press-fit patients and 3.2 ± 3.0 in cemented patients (P = .005). The mean ASES score was 87.7 ± 12.4 in press-fit patients and 69.5 ± 22.7 in cemented patients (P = .002). Lastly, the mean SST score was 9.8 ± 3.1 in press-fit patients and 7.7 ± 3.7 in cemented patients (P = .040). Both fixation techniques provided lasting implant survivorship with only a single revision operation in each of the cohorts. CONCLUSION: Herein, we provide a propensity-matched, long-term comparison of patients receiving anatomic shoulder arthroplasty stratified according to humeral stem fixation technique. The results of this analysis illustrate that both types of humeral fixation techniques yield durable and significant improvements in shoulder function with similar rates of survival at 10 years of follow-up.

Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using press-fit bony plug: a case series study.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility, operative time, clinical outcomes, possible complications, and failure rates of all-through arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using press-fit bony plug technique. METHODS: This prospective case series study involved 30 skeletally mature patients with long head of biceps pathology (tendinitis after failure of conservative treatment, subluxation, dislocation, or tendon tears). All patients were followed up for 24 months at least. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients regained full shoulder and elbow range of motion; one case suffered from reflex sympathetic dystrophy. There was a significant improvement in the constant, ASES, and VAS scores when comparing the pre-operative and post-operative values. The average biceps strength was 96% compared to the opposite healthy side. No cases were complicated by neuro-vascular deficits or failure of the tenodesis. CONCLUSION: Press-fit biceps tenodesis is safe and accessible with low economic demands. We recommend this technique to be used more often when addressing patients with long head of biceps pathologies. REGISTRATION DATA: Registration number: N-1562023. Registration date: June 2022 "Retrospectively registered".

Does humeral fixation technique affect long-term outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: For anatomic total arthroscopic repair, cementless humeral fixation has recently gained popularity. However, few studies have compared clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and press-fit humeral fixation, and none have performed follow-up for longer than 5 years. In this study, we compared long-term postoperative outcomes in patients receiving a cemented versus press-fit humeral stem anatomic arthroscopic repair. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 169 shoulders that required primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Shoulders were stratified by humeral stem fixation technique: cementation or press-fit. Data were collected pre- and postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included range of motion, patient reported outcomes, and radiographic measures. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight cemented humeral stems and 31 press-fit stems were included. Significant improvements in range of motion were seen in all aTSA patients with no significant differences between final cemented and press-fit stems (forward elevation: P=0.12, external rotation: P=0.60, and internal rotation: P=0.77). Patient reported outcome metrics also exhibited sustained improvement through final follow-up. However, at final follow-up, the press-fit stem cohort had significantly better overall scores when compared to the cemented cohort (visual analog score: P=0.04, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score: P<0.01, Simple Shoulder Test score: P=0.03). Humeral radiolucency was noted in two cemented implants and one press-fit implant. No significant differences in implant survival were observed between the two cohorts (P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, we found that irrespective of humeral fixation technique, aTSA significantly improves shoulder function. However, within this cohort, press-fit stems provided significantly better outcomes than cemented stems in terms of patient reported outcome scores. Level of evidence: III.

The Effects of Different Femoral Component Materials on Bone and Implant Response in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.

Due to the high stiffness of the biomaterials used in total knee arthroplasty, stress shielding can lead to decreased periprosthetic bone mineral density and bone resorption. As different materials and 3D-printed highly porous surfaces are available for knee femoral components from the industry nowadays, this study aimed to compare the effects of two same-design cruciate-retaining femoral components, made with CoCr and titanium alloy, respectively, on periprosthetic bone stresses through a finite element model of the implanted knee in order to evaluate the induced stress shielding. Moreover, the effect of the cementless highly porous surface of the titanium implant was analyzed in comparison to the cemented interface of the CoCr implant. The von Mises stresses were analyzed in different periprosthetic regions of interest of the femur with different configurations and knee flexion angles. The titanium component induced higher bone stresses in comparison with the CoCr component, mostly in the medial compartment at higher knee flexion angles; therefore, the CoCr component led to more stress shielding. The model was revealed to be effective in describing the effects of different femoral component materials on bone stress, highlighting how a cementless, highly porous titanium femoral component might lead to less stress shielding in comparison to a cemented CoCr implant with significant clinical relevance and reduced bone resorption after total knee arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic Occult Femoral Fracture: An Unknown Side Effect of Press-Fit Fixation in Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to examine the prevalence and risk factors for development of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures during primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to assess the clinical consequences of these fractures. Materials and Methods: A total of 199 hips were examined. Periprosthetic occult femoral fractures were defined as fractures not detected intraoperatively and on postoperative radiographs, but only observed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Clinical, surgical, and radiographic analysis of variables was performed for identification of risk factors for periprosthetic occult femoral fractures. A comparison of stem subsidence, stem alignment, and thigh pain between the occult fracture group and the non-fracture group was also performed. Results: Periprosthetic occult femoral fractures were detected during the operation in 21 (10.6%) of 199 hips. Of eight hips with periprosthetic occult femoral fractures that were detected around the lesser trochanter, concurrent periprosthetic occult femoral fractures located at different levels were detected in six hips (75.0%). Only the female sex showed significant association with an increased risk of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures (odds ratio for males, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.01; P=0.04). A significant difference in the incidence of thigh pain was observed between the occult fracture group and the non-fracture group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Occurrence of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures is relatively common during primary THA using tapered wedge stems. We recommend CT referral for female patients who report unexplained early postoperative thigh pain or developed periprosthetic intraoperative femoral fractures around the lesser trochanter during primary THA using tapered wedge stems.

Osteoconductive Scaffold Placed at the Femoral Tunnel Aperture in Hamstring Tendon ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Bone tunnel enlargement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains an unsolved problem that complicates revision surgery. Hypothesis: Positioning of an osteoconductive scaffold at the femoral tunnel aperture improves graft-to-bone incorporation and thereby decreases bone tunnel widening. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: In a 1:1 ratio, 56 patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to receive femoral fixation with cortical suspension fixation and secondary press-fit fixation at the tunnel aperture of the tendon graft only (control) or with augmentation by an osteoconductive scaffold (intervention). Adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, and passive knee stability were recorded over 2 years after the index surgery. Three-dimensional bone tunnel widening was assessed using computed tomography at the time of surgery and 4.5 months and 1 year postoperatively. Results: The intervention group exhibited a similar number of adverse events as the control group (8 vs 10; P = .775) including 2 partial reruptures in both groups. The approach was feasible, although 1 case was encountered where the osteoconductive scaffold was malpositioned without adversely affecting the patient's recovery. There was no difference between the intervention and control groups in femoral bone tunnel enlargement, as expressed by the relative change in tunnel volume from surgery to 4.5 months (mean ± SD, 36% ± 25% vs 40% ± 25%; P = .644) and 1 year (19% ± 20% vs 17% ± 25%; P =.698). Conclusion: Press-fit graft fixation with an osteoconductive scaffold positioned at the femoral tunnel aperture is safe but does not decrease femoral bone tunnel enlargement at postoperative 1 year. Registration: NCT03462823 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Trends and risk factors for readmissions following press-fit total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee: a five-year analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The development of new prostheses with improved osseointegration, bone preservation, and reduced cost has renewed interest in uncemented total knee arthroplasty (UCTKA). In the current study, we aimed to: (1) assess demographic data of patients who were and were not readmitted and (2) identify patient-specific risk factors associated with readmission. METHODS: A retrospective query from the PearlDiver database was performed from January 1, 2015, to October 31, 2020. International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding was used to distinguish cohorts of patients who had osteoarthritis of the knee and underwent UCTKA. Patients readmitted within 90 days were classified as the study population, while those who were not readmitted were classified as control. A linear regression model was utilized to analyze readmission risk factors. RESULTS: The query yielded 14,575 patients, with 986 (6.8%) being readmitted. Patient demographics such as age (P < 0.0001), sex (P < 0.009), and comorbidity (P < 0.0001) were associated with annual 90-day readmission. Patient-specific risk factors associated with 90-day readmission following press-fit total knee arthroplasty were: arrhythmia (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.11-1.49, P < 0.0005), coagulopathy (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.63, P < 0.0007), fluid and electrolyte abnormalities (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.38-1.84, P < 0.0001), iron deficiency anemia (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.27-1.73, P < 0.0001), and obesity (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18-1.60, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that patients with comorbidities, such as fluid and electrolyte problems, iron deficiency anemia, and obesity, were at an increased risk of readmission after having an uncemented total knee replacement. The risks of readmission following an uncemented total knee arthroplasty can be discussed with patients who have certain comorbidities by arthroplasty surgeons.

Minimum 5-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for a Single Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty System Using Hybrid Fixation and Press-Fit Stems.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid fixation, utilizing diaphyseal press-fit stems and cement fixation in the tibial and femoral metaphyseal areas, has long been a strategy for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survivorships of hybrid fixation using a single rTKA revision system with a minimum of 5 years follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively collected database to identify 281 patients who underwent rTKA using a single revision system with hybrid fixation and press-fit stems between July 2006 and August 2016. We reviewed the clinical outcome scores, including the Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey. We also evaluated the 5 and 10-year survivorships and the indications for reoperations. The cohort had a mean age of 70 years (range, 45.2 to 92.0) and a mean body mass index of 33.4 (range, 17.3 to 55.8). The mean time from rTKA surgery was 11.1 years (range, 5.3 to 15.5). RESULTS: Paired t-test analyses showed significant improvements from preoperative versus postoperative clinical outcome scores (P < .001) for Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis, and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical component. Prosthetic joint infections after index rTKA were the most common failure mode with 29 patients requiring reoperations. Rerevision due to aseptic loosening was uncommon (6 patients) with a cumulative survival rate of 95.2% at 5 years and 94.2% at 10 years. CONCLUSION: The use of this single rTKA system utilizing press fit stems combined with hybrid fixation provided significant improvements in the clinical outcomes and excellent survivorships at 5 and 10 years.