Comparative Performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Primary Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy.

This prospective study aimed to (1) compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with respect to conventional imaging (computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS)) in the primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients and (2) validate PSMA-PET/CT accuracy in pelvic nodal staging in comparison with postoperative histopathology and assess PSMA-PET/CT's impact on patient management. Sixty castration-sensitive high-risk (ISUP 4-5 and/or PSA > 20 ng/mL and/or cT3) PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy were enrolled (median PSA 10.10 [IQR: 6.22-17.95] ng/mL). PSMA-PET/CT, compared with CT, identified nodal (N) and/or distant metastases (M1) in 56.7% (34/60) vs. 13.3% (8/60) (p < 0.001) of patients: N + 45% vs. 13.3% (p < 0.001), M1a 11.7% vs. 1.7% (p = 0.03), M1b 23.3% vs. 1.7% (p < 0.001). Compared with BS, PSMA-PET/CT localized unknown skeletal metastases in 15% (9/60) of cases, with no false negative findings. Overall, PSMA-PET/CT led to a TNM upstaging in 45.0% (27/60) of cases, with no evidence of downstaging, resulting in a change in management in up to 28.8% (17/59) of patients. Compared with histopathology data (n = 32 patients), the per-patient accuracy of PSMA-PET/TC for detecting pelvic nodal metastases was 90.6%. Overall, the above evidence supports the use of PSMA-PET/CT in the diagnostic workup of high-risk prostate cancer staging.

Therapeutic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in patients with clinical stage I and IIA, HER2-positive, or triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: While 18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) is consensual for clinical stage ≥ IIB breast cancers (BC), its benefit for stage I or IIA HER2+ or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients lacks sufficient evidence. We reported a single-institution, retrospective study evaluating FDG-PET/CT impact on patient management and staging for stage I or IIA HER2+ or Triple-Negative BC. METHODS: Patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT staging before any treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 at Oscar Lambret Center were included. EXCLUSIONS: patients with symptoms or conventional imaging suggestive of metastatic dissemination, or with prior malignancies. Initial stage was determined from mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, and clinical examination. Staging and therapeutic impact based on FDG-PET/CT findings collected, including intra- (modification of dose/site/strategy in a type of management previously indicated) and inter-modality (modification of planned treatment strategy) changes. RESULTS: The cohort included 287 female patients with clinical stage I or IIA, HER2+ , or TNBC. Therapeutic impact observed for 18% of patients (n = 52), with 2% (n = 7) undergoing inter-modality change with omission of planned surgery. The impact on patient management was higher for stage IIA patients (20%, 47/237) than for stage I patients (10%, 5/50). Among stage IIA disease, changes in management were more important for T2N0 patients (22%, 44/205) than for T1N1 patients (9%, 3/32). While not statistically significant, trends suggest usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for T2N0 patients. CONCLUSION: Considering substantial therapeutic implications, our study suggests the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for patients with stage IIA, HER2-positive, or Triple-Negative BC with tumor size > 2 cm (T2N0).

Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in initial staging of patients with prostate cancer and importance of intraprostatic SUVmax values.

BACKGROUND: As in disease recurrence, providing clinicians with the exact extent of the disease at the time of initial diagnosis is key in the management and individual treatment of prostate cancer (PC) patients. Intending to examine the usefulness of gallium- 68 PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) and to determine if there is a correlation between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum values, WHO/ISUP (World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology's) grade group of the tumor and SUVmax (maximized standardized uptake value) values we retrospectively analyzed PET/CT studies performed for initial staging of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 34 studies of patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT as part of the initial staging of prostate cancer. All patients had prostate cancer confirmed by histological assessment after biopsy and had Gleason score and PSA serum values obtained. The mean PSA value was 33.8 ± 40.9 nmol/L (range 2.2-232). RESULTS: Nineteen patients had extended disease (55.9%). The mean SUVmax in prostate lesions was 19.5 ± 12.6. The mean value of SUVmax of PET studies in the high-risk group was significantly higher than those of low risk (23.5 ± 13.2 and 10.6 ± 5.4, p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the ISUP group and SUVmax value of prostate lesions (Pearson's r = 0.557, p < 0.01). A positive correlation was also found in the comparison between PSA values and SUVmax (Pearson's r = 0.34, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans detected the extended disease in more than half of the patients. Locating disease beyond the prostate gland allowed better informed clinical decisions and modified treatment. A positive correlation was found between intraprostatic SUVmax values and the ISUP group of prostate cancer. High-risk patients had SUVmax values that were significantly higher than those of low-risk patients. The correlation between the Gleason score and SUVmax value can be explained by the increased intensity of PSMA expression as the tumor grade increases.

[99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT in the initial staging of 227 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a 5-year monocentric retrospective study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT in the initial staging of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 227 consecutive patients who underwent [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT imaging for the primary staging of newly diagnosed PCa. The presence and location of PSMA-positive lesions were determined, and the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the primary prostate tumor were also measured. The metastatic findings and SUVmax were stratified according to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and D'Amico classification. Furthermore, the [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT findings were compared to the histopathological findings in patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Results: Of the 227 patients, 92.1% (209/227) had positive [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT findings. Advanced disease was detected in 38.8% (88/227) of the patients and was positively correlated with increasing ISUP grade and PSA levels. Lymph node metastases (both pelvic and extrapelvic), bone metastases, and visceral metastases were detected in 30.0% (68/227), 25.6% (58/227), and 3.1% (7/227) of the patients, respectively. For the 129 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with PLND, the sensitivity of [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT in the evaluation of PCa was 90.7% (117/129). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting pelvic lymph node metastases on [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT were 23.5% (12/51), 93.6% (73/78), 65.9% (85/129), 70.6% (12/17), and 65.2% (73/112), respectively. Among the 209 patients with PSMA-avid primary prostate disease, the SUVmax of the primary prostate tumor was significantly associated with ISUP grade (p<0.0001), PSA levels (p<0.0001), D'Amico classification (p<0.0001), and advanced disease (p<0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that a PSA level >19.8 ng/ml and SUVmax of the primary prostate tumor >7.4 had a sensitivity of 71.6% and 71.6% and specificity of 76.9% and 82.6%, respectively, for detecting metastatic disease. Conclusions: [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-ALUG SPECT/CT emerges as a valuable imaging tool for the initial staging of newly diagnosed PCa. The presence of advanced disease and the SUVmax of the primary prostate tumor were positively correlated with ISUP grade and PSA levels.

The Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Primary Staging of Selected Renal Tumours: Initial Experience in a Multicentre Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Accurate primary staging of renal cancer with conventional imaging is challenging. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) may serve to improve the accuracy of renal cancer staging. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinicopathological and management differences for primary renal cancer staged with PSMA PET/CT in comparison to conventional imaging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of PSMA PET/CT scans performed for primary staging of renal cancer and incidental renal lesions at three sites in Brisbane, Australia between June 2015 and June 2020. Clinical characteristics, imaging, and histopathology were reviewed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Clinicopathological and management differences according to staging modality (PSMA PET/CT, conventional imaging) were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to report demographics and clinical parameters. Nonparametric methods were used for statistical analysis. Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of small-cell size categorical variables. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From a total of 120 PSMA PET/CT scans, 61 were included (52 staging, 9 incidental) for predominantly males (74%) with a mean age of 65.1 yr (standard deviation 12.0). Most primary lesions (40/51) were clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC; 98% PSMA-avid), eight were non-ccRCC (75% PSMA-avid), and three were non-RCC (oncocytoma; 67% PSMA-avid). PSMA PET identified a greater number of presumed metastatic lesions than conventional imaging (195 vs 160). A management change was observed for 32% of patients (20% major, 12% minor). Limitations include the retrospective design and selection bias, lack of blinding to PSMA reporting, and the use of different PSMA radiotracers. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET/CT detected more metastases than conventional imaging and most renal cancers were PSMA-avid, resulting in a management change for one-third of the patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at a newer type of scan called PSMA PET/CT for first staging of kidney cancer. We found that this detects more metastasis and helps in decisions on changes in treatment for some patients. This type of imaging is a useful addition to conventional scans in tricky cases and may help in better selection of suitable treatments, but more studies are required.

The prognostic role of next-generation imaging-driven upstaging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Phase III evidence showed that next-generation imaging (NGI), such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT), provides higher diagnostic accuracy than bone scan and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (conventional imaging, CI) in the primary staging of intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, due to the lack of outcome data, the introduction of NGI in routine clinical practice is still debated. Analysing the oncological outcome of patients upstaged by NGI (though managed according to CI) might shed light on this issue, supporting the design of randomised trials comparing the effects of treatments delivered based on NGI vs. CI. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled a cohort of 100 biopsy-proven intermediate-to-high-risk PCa patients staged with CI and PSMA PET/CT (though managed according to the CI stage), to assess the frequency of the stage migration phenomenon. Stage migration was then assessed as biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) predictor. RESULTS: Three patients were lost at follow-up after imaging. PSMA PET/CT upstaged 26.8% of patients compared to CI, while it downstaged 6.1% of patients. Notably, 50% of patients excluded from surgery due to the presence of bone metastases at CI would have been treated with radical-intent approaches if PSMA PET/CT had guided the treatment choice. After a median follow-up of 6 months of surgically treated patients, 22/83 (26.5%) had biochemical recurrence (BCR). PSMA PET/CT-driven upstaging determined a significant risk increase for BCR (HR:3.41, 95%CI:1.21-9.56, p = 0.019). Including stage migration in a univariable and multivariable model identified PSMA PET/CT-upstaging as an independent predictor of bRFS. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, implementing NGI for staging purposes improves the prediction of bRFS. Although phase III evidence is still needed, this advancement suggests that NGI may better identify patients who would benefit from local treatments than those who may achieve better oncological outcomes through systemic treatment.

Intra-individual comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus bone scan in detecting skeletal metastasis at prostate cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance and radiological staging impact of 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) compared to 99 Tc whole-body bone scan (WBBS) for the detection of skeletal metastasis in the primary staging of prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective institutional database was retrospectively examined for patients who underwent both PSMA PET and WBBS within a 1 week interval for PCa primary staging. Lesions were categorised as 'negative', 'equivocal', or 'definite' based on nuclear medicine physician interpretation. Metastatic burden was characterised for each imaging modality according to three groups: (i) local disease (no skeletal metastases), (ii) oligometastatic disease (three or fewer skeletal metastases), or (iii) polymetastatic disease (more than three skeletal metastases). RESULTS: There were 667 patients included. The median (interquartile range) prostate-specific antigen level was 9.2 (6.2-16) ng/mL and 60% of patients were high risk according to a modified D'Amico risk classification. The overall distribution of skeletal metastasis detection changed across the two scans overall (P = 0.003), being maintained within high-risk (P = 0.030) and low-risk (P = 0.018) groups. PSMA PET/CT identified more definite skeletal metastases compared to WBBS overall (10.3% vs 7.3%), and according to risk grouping (high: 12% vs 9%, intermediate: 4% vs 1%). Upstaging was more common with PSMA PET/CT than WBBS (P = 0.001). The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax ) of the primary tumour was associated with upstaging of skeletal metastases on PSMA PET/CT (P = 0.025), while age was associated with upstaging on WBBS (P = 0.021). The SUVmax of the primary tumour and metastases were both higher according to extent of metastatic disease (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: More skeletal metastases were detected with PSMA PET/CT than WBBS, resulting in a higher upstaging rate mostly in high-risk patients. The SUVmax of the primary tumour and metastases was associated with upstaging.

The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled PSMA-ligand PET for tumour staging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to histopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The current clinical recommendations posit the deployment of specific approved radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) for detecting metastatic prostate cancer during primary staging. Nevertheless, the precise efficacy of such ligands in localizing intraprostatic tumours (index tumour) and T-staging is not well established. Consequently, the objective of this inquiry is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET in the tumour staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer by means of a meta-analysis that integrates studies utilizing histological confirmation as the reference standard. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using a predefined collection of search terms. These terms included 'PSMA PET', 'primary staging', and 'prostate cancer'. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated all the studies based on predetermined inclusion criteria, extracted pertinent data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Any disparities were resolved by a third reviewer. A random effects Sidik-Jonkman model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis and estimate the diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis, along with 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, an appraisal regarding the likelihood of publication bias and the impact of small-study effects was performed utilizing both Egger's test and a graphical examination of the funnel plot. RESULTS: The present analysis comprised a total of twenty-three scientific papers encompassing 969 patients and involved their analysis by both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The results of this study demonstrated that the estimated diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI, for the detection of intraprostatic tumours, regardless of the type of PSMA-ligand, was 86% (95% CI: 76-96%) and 97% (95% CI: 94-100%), respectively. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of extraprostatic extension (EPE) was 73% (95% CI: 64-82%) and 77% (95% CI: 69-85%), while the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of seminal vesicle involvement (SVI) was 87% (95% CI: 80-93) and 90% (95% CI: 82-99%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The present investigation has demonstrated that PSMA PET/MRI surpasses currently recommended multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in terms of diagnostic accuracy as inferred from a notable data trajectory, whereas PSMA-PET/CT exhibited comparable diagnostic accuracy for intraprostatic tumour detection and T-staging compared to mpMRI. Nevertheless, the analysis has identified certain potential limitations, such as small-study effects and a potential for publication bias, which may impact the overall conclusions drawn from this study.

Is PSMA PET/CT cost-effective for the primary staging in prostate cancer? First results for European countries and the USA based on the proPSMA trial.

PURPOSE: The proPSMA trial at ten Australian centers demonstrated increased sensitivity and specificity for PSMA PET/CT compared to conventional imaging regarding metastatic status in primary high-risk prostate cancer patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed benefits of PSMA PET/CT over conventional imaging for the Australian setting. However, comparable data for other countries are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to verify the cost-effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT in several European countries as well as the USA. METHODS: Clinical data on diagnostic accuracy were derived from the proPSMA trial. Costs for PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging were taken from reimbursements of national health systems and individual billing information of selected centers in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the USA. For comparability, scan duration and the decision tree of the analysis were adopted from the Australian cost-effectiveness study. RESULTS: In contrast to the Australian setting, PSMA PET/CT was primarily associated with increased costs in the studied centers in Europe and the USA. Mainly, the scan duration had an impact on the cost-effectiveness. However, costs for an accurate diagnosis using PSMA PET/CT seemed reasonably low compared to the potential consequential costs of an inaccurate diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We assume that the use of PSMA PET/CT is appropriate from a health economic perspective, but this will need to be verified by a prospective evaluation of patients at initial diagnosis.

Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is coming up as a superior imaging tool for prostate cancer (PCa). However, its use in primary staging is still debated. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in staging patients with intermediate and high risk PCa candidates to radical prostatectomy managed in the Prostate Cancer Unit of our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with biopsy-proven PCa staged through PSMA PET/CT before undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). PET findings were categorized with respect to primary tumor (T), nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M). We analyzed the correspondence between PSMA PET/CT and final histopathological examination. RESULTS: We evaluated 42 men with high and intermediate risk PCa submitted to RP with ePLND. Mean age was 65.5 years (range, 49-76 years) and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 13 ng/mL (IQR, 8.1-20 ng/mL). Patients in the high-risk group were 23 (54.7%), and the remainders were in the intermediate risk group. The mean risk of lymph node involvement (LNI) using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)-nomogram was 20%. The most common International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade was 3 (26.19%) after prostate biopsy. PSMA PET/CT showed focal prostatic uptake in 28 patients [mean value of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) 18.5] and detected pelvic lymph node metastases in 6 cases (14.3%) with a median value of SUVmax 4.5 (IQR, 2-6.9). Histopathological examination detected lymph node metastases in seven patients (16.6%). In the only patient with negative PSMA PET/CT pathology revealed the presence of micrometastasis. After histopathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of pre-operative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 85.7%, 100%, 100% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT holds high overall diagnostic value for lymph node staging in patients with intermediate and high risk PCa. Accuracy may depend on lymph node size.

Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Whether prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) should replace conventional imaging modalities (CIM) for initial staging of intermediate-high risk prostate cancer (PCa) requires definitive evidence on their relative diagnostic abilities. OBJECTIVE: To perform head-to-head comparisons of PSMA-PET and CIM including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) for upfront staging of tumour, nodal, and bone metastasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to December 2021. Only studies in which patients underwent both PSMA-PET and CIM and imaging was referenced against histopathology or composite reference standards were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist and its extension for comparative reviews (QUADAS-C). Pairwise comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA-PET versus CIM were performed by adding imaging modality as a covariate to bivariate mixed-effects meta-regression models. The likelihood ratio test was applied to determine whether statistically significant differences existed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 31 studies (2431 patients) were included. PSMA-PET/MRI was more sensitive than mpMRI for detection of extra-prostatic extension (78.7% versus 52.9%) and seminal vesicle invasion (66.7% versus 51.0%). For nodal staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than mpMRI (73.7% versus 38.9%, 97.5% versus 82.6%) and CT (73.2% versus 38.5%, 97.8% versus 83.6%). For bone metastasis staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than BS with or without single-photon emission computerised tomography (98.0% versus 73.0%, 96.2% versus 79.1%). A time interval between imaging modalities >1 month was identified as a source of heterogeneity across all nodal staging analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Direct comparisons revealed that PSMA-PET significantly outperforms CIM, which suggests that PSMA-PET should be used as a first-line approach for the initial staging of PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed direct comparisons of the ability of a scan method called PSMA-PET (prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) and current imaging methods to detect the spread of prostate cancer outside the prostate gland. We found that PSMA-PET is more accurate for detection of the spread of prostate cancer to adjacent tissue, nearby lymph nodes, and bones.

Not All Glittering Bone Lesions Are Gold: A Case of Sclerotic Bone Lesions with Elevated 68 Ga PSMA and 99m Tc HDP Uptake with No Signs of Malignancy.

Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 68 Ga PSMA PET/CT) outperforms CT and bone scintigraphy in terms of diagnostic accuracy for the primary staging of prostate cancer and has become widely used. However, 68 Ga PSMA uptake is also encountered in nonprostatic tissue. We present a 63-year-old male with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer who underwent bone scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), which showed inhomogeneous elevated uptake in sclerotic bone lesions in the pelvis. Likewise, 68 Ga PSMA PET/CT revealed inhomogeneous uptake in the same areas. Subsequent biopsy revealed hyperplastic bone marrow without signs of malignancy. The patient underwent radical prostatectomy, and the prostate-specific antigen level dropped to less than 0.1 ng/mL.

Distant Nodes Seen on PSMA PET-CT Staging Predicts Post-Treatment Progression in Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer-A Prospective Cohort Study.

PSMA PET-CT scans are now recommended in international urological guidelines for primary staging and re-staging of prostate cancer. However, there is little published literature on the clinical outcomes for patients after treatment decisions made using PSMA PET-CT results. This is a multisite, prospective cohort study investigating the clinical outcomes of men who received treatment plans based on PSMA PET-CT results for primary staging. Men with biopsy proven prostate cancer received a PSMA PET-CT scan for primary staging. Treatment plans were recommended by multidisciplinary teams (MDT). After treatment, these men were followed with 6 monthly PSA tests and imaging or biopsies if recommended by MDT. The primary outcome was treatment progression defined as the addition or change of any treatment modalities such as androgen deprivation therapy, radiation therapy or chemotherapy. In total, 80% of men did not have any treatment progression after enactment of treatment based on PSMA PET-CT primary staging results at 29 months of follow up. Men who had distant nodes seen on PSMA PET-CT had a 5 times increased risk of treatment progression. Larger studies with longer follow up are needed to validate our results and optimise the way clinicians use PSMA PET-CT results to guide management.

Recurrence rate after radical prostatectomy following primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: Accurate primary staging is one of the most important issues for initial management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients to perform an optimal selection of patients for curative intended treatment. 68Ga-Prostate-Specific-Membrane-Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT was found superior to conventional imaging both for detection of recurrence after curative intended treatment and for primary staging. We studied the recurrence rate after radical prostatectomy in high-risk PCa patients primary staged with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared with conventional imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 247 D'Amico high-risk PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) after primary staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and a reference group of 137 high-risk patients with RP after conventional imaging (99mTc bone scintigraphy and CT). Recurrence rates were assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 71.1% in the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT cohort compared with 56.4% in the conventional imaging cohort. Primary staging by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT reduced biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk by 42% (HR = 0.58 (0.41-0.83), p = .004). CONCLUSION: The present data could indicate a lower recurrence rate after RP following primary staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared to conventional imaging, likely due to improved selection of patients for surgery.

The clinical consequences of routine 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, ISUP grade 5 and no metastases based on standard imaging - preliminary results.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical consequences of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for primary staging in patients with ISUP grade 5 (Gleason score ≥9) prostate cancer (PCa), and no definitive distant metastases based on standard imaging. METHODS: At our tertial referral center, PSMA PET/CT became standard of care from August 2018 for primary staging of prostate cancer given the following criteria: (1) no prior treatment for prostate cancer, (2) ISUP grade 5, (3) no definitive metastases on standard imaging (contrast enhanced CT and bone scintigraphy), and (4) deemed suitable for treatment with curative intent based on comorbidity and life expectancy. We present the preliminary results of first six months recruitment with 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (mean age 69 years, median PSA 13.0 ng/mL, 20 patients with locally advanced PCa) were included. CT was positive in pelvic lymph nodes in two patients, bone scintigraphy was equivocal in three patients. PSMA PET/CT showed pathological uptake outside the prostatic bed in 22 patients (46%) of which 13 patients (27%) showed lesions confined to regional lymph nodes, and nine patients (19%) showed nonregional lymph node metastases and/or bone metastases. PSMA PET/CT changed the treatment strategy from curatively intended treatment to palliative treatment in 18 patients (38%). CONCLUSION: PMSA PET/CT revealed pathological uptake in a large proportion of high-risk patients at primary staging among patients with no definite metastases on standard imaging leading to change of patient management in 38% of the patients.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in men referred for prostate biopsy: primary tumour localization and interreader agreement.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended by the European Urology Association guidelines as the standard modality for imaging-guided biopsy. Recently positron emission tomography with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA PET) has shown promising results as a tool for this purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of positron emission tomography with prostate-specific membrane antigen/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) using the gallium-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA-11) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for pre-biopsy tumour localization and interreader agreement for visual and semiquantitative analysis. Semiquantitative parameters included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and maximum lesion diameter for mpMRI and standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and PSMA-positive volume (PSMAvol) for PSMA PET/MRI. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were 61.4% and 92.9% for mpMRI and 66.7% and 92.9% for PSMA PET/MRI for reader one, respectively. RPE was available in 23 patients and 41 of 47 quadrants with discrepant findings. Based on RPE results, the specificity for both imaging modalities increased to 98% and 99%, and the sensitivity improved to 63.9% and 72.1% for mpMRI and PSMA PET/MRI, respectively. Both modalities yielded a substantial interreader agreement for primary tumour localization (mpMRI kappa = 0.65 (0.52-0.79), PSMA PET/MRI kappa = 0.73 (0.61-0.84)). ICC for SUVmax, PSMAvol and lesion diameter were almost perfect (≥ 0.90) while for ADC it was only moderate (ICC = 0.54 (0.04-0.78)). ADC and lesion diameter did not correlate significantly with Gleason score (ρ = 0.26 and ρ = 0.16) while SUVmax and PSMAvol did (ρ = - 0.474 and ρ = - 0.468). CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET/MRI has similar accuracy and reliability to mpMRI regarding primary prostate cancer (PCa) localization. In our cohort, semiquantitative parameters from PSMA PET/MRI correlated with tumour grade and were more reliable than the ones from mpMRI.

Significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion uptake measured using Ga-68 labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission-tomography and computed-tomography(PSMA-PET/CT) in primary nodal staging of prostate cancer (PCa), and the predictive value of volumetric parameters derived from Ga-68- PSMA-PET/CT data in lymph node(LN) metastasis and correlation with histopathological and surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven PCa who underwent Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging of disease and underwent radical prostatectomy with extendend pelvic LN dissection were evaluated retrospectively. 2 experienced nuclear medicine specialists have retrospectively reviewed PET/CT images blinded to all histopathological and clinical data. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV), and negative predictive value(NPV) for the detection of LN metastases were analyzed per-patient. Volumetric and semiquantitative PET parameters of the primary prostate lesions including SUVmax,metabolic tumor volume(MTV), and total lesion uptake(TLU) were measured and recorded. RESULTS: Primary tumor SUVmax, MTV and TLU were found significantly higher in patients who were in higher ISUP Grade groups 3,4,5 after surgical treatment (P = 0.021,P = 0.049,P = 0.032, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV on LN metastasis detection of Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT was found 60%, 91%, 82% and 78% respectively. Although the distribution of the measured primary tumor MTV and TLU values were higher in histopathologically proven LN metastasis positive patients compared to negative patients, only TLU was statistically significant(P = 0.023). Increase in primary tumor TLU values were correlated with higher pT stages and surgical margin positivity(P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT is of clinically valuable for primary staging. Measuring and adding these 2 parameters in routine clinical evaluation may increase the prediction power of high-grade disease confirmed by surgery.

Hot needles can confirm accurate lesion sampling intraoperatively using [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT-guided biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET is increasingly used for staging prostate cancer (PCa) with high accuracy to detect significant PCa (sigPCa). [68 Ga]PSMA-11 PET/MRI-guided biopsy showed promising results but also persisting limitation of sampling error, due to impaired image fusion. We aimed to assess the possibility of intraoperative quantification of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT uptake in core biopsies as an instant confirmation for accurate lesion sampling. METHODS: In this IRB-approved, prospective, proof-of-concept study, we included five consecutive patients with suspected PCa. All underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans followed by immediate PET/CT-guided and saturation template biopsy (3.1 ± 0.3 h after PET). The activity in biopsy cores was measured as counts per minute (cpm) in a gamma spectrometer. Pearson's test was used to correlate counts with histopathology (WHO/ISUP), tumor length, and membranous PSMA expression on immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: In 43 of 113 needles, PCa was present. The mean cpm was overall significantly higher in needles with PCa (263 ± 396 cpm) compared to needles without PCa (73 ± 44 cpm, p < 0.001). In one patient with moderate PSMA uptake (SUVmax 8.7), 13 out of 24 needles had increased counts (100-200 cpm) but only signs of inflammation and PSMA expression in benign glands on IHC. Excluding this case, ROC analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.81, with an optimal cut-off to confirm PCa at 75 cpm (sens/spec of 65.1%/87%). In all 4 patients with PCa, the first or second PSMA PET-guided needle was positive for sigPCa with high counts (156-2079 cpm). CONCLUSIONS: [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake in PCa can be used to confirm accurate lesion sampling of the dominant tumor intraoperatively. This technique could improve confidence in imaging-based biopsy guidance and reduce the need for saturation biopsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03187990, 15/06/2017.

Incremental Impact of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary N and M Staging of Prostate Cancer Prior to Curative-Intent Surgery: a Prospective Clinical Trial in Comparison with mpMRI.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this prospective study was to assess the value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen ([68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in primary N and M staging of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients before planned curative-intent radical prostatectomy (RPE) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). The second objective was to compare the [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT findings with standard of care pelvic multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of locoregional lymph node metastases and intraprostatic prostate cancer. PROCEDURES: A total of 81 patients (mean age: 64.5 years, baseline mean trigger PSA (tPSA) 15.4 ng/ml, ± 15.9) with biopsy proven PCa (24 intermediate- and 57 high risk) scheduled for RPE and ePLND were enrolled in this prospective study. In 52 patients [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, pelvic mpMRI, and RPE with ePLND have been performed. Clinical risk stratification and related biomarkers as well as Gleason score (GS) were recorded. The location of the index lesion (IL) was documented systematically for each modality using a standardized segmentation of the prostate in six segments. Distant bone and lymph node metastasis detected by [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were documented. [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT findings were correlated with results of mpMRI and histopathology. A consensus of imaging, clinical and/or follow-up findings were used for determining the distant metastases, which were not verified by histopathology. RESULTS: In the patient cohort who underwent RPE, [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI detected the IL in 86.5% and 98.1% of the patients, respectively. The median of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the intraprostatic IL was 12 (range, 4.7-67.8). Intraprostatic IL of the high-risk patients showed significantly higher SUVmax than those in patients with intermediate risk for distant metastases (n = 48; median: 17.84 vs. 8.77; p = 0.02). In total 729 LN were removed by ePLND in 48 patients. The histopathology verified 26 pelvic lymph node metastases (pLNM) in 20.8% (10/48) of the patients, which have been correctly identified in 60% of the patients on [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and in 50% on mpMRI. All but one pLNM had a maximum diameter below 10 mm. Bone metastases (BM) and distant LNM (dLNM) were found in 17.3% of the patients on [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. 39.0% of the [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-positive BM showed no suspicious morphological correlation on CT. CONCLUSION: [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT shows high diagnostic performance for N and M staging of patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer and seems to be superior to pelvic mpMRI in the detection of locoregional lymph node metastases. A significant correlation was found between SUVmax of the intraprostatic index lesion and risk stratification based on tPSA level and GS. The results of this study emphasize again on the role of metabolic molecular imaging using specific tracers in selected patients, leading to tailored therapy approach.

Adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in endometrial cancer.

Endometrial cancer (EC) usually presented as a localized disease at diagnosis (67%), 20% of patients diagnosed with regional spread, and distant metastasis accounted for 9%. The standard treatments include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic with/without paraaortic lymph node dissection/biopsy. Adjuvant therapy is arranged according to risk factors and stages. Risk group classification varied among different guidelines and studies and evolved with time. Adjuvant modalities include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, antiangiogenesis agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and multi-target agents. We review the recent literature to incorporate important advances in trial results, real-world big data, and knowledge in biomarkers of EC to update appropriate adjuvant therapy and post-surgical treatment of EC patients.