Real-world efficacy of low dose osimertinib as second-line treatment in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Response rates of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to lower doses of osimertinib [20 mg once daily (OD) and 40 mg OD] are similar to those of the recommended dose of 80 mg OD, but there is a lack of real-world evidence on the effect of the lower doses of osimertinib on survival outcomes. We conducted this study to assess the efficacy and safety of lower osimertinib doses for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC whose disease had progressed on earlier generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a real-world clinical practice. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC treated with low doses of osimertinib after failing first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs due to acquired T790M mutation. Data on demographics, staging, treatment history, best overall response rate (ORR) based on RECIST 1.1, and adverse events (AEs) were collected from the patients' case notes. Descriptive data were described in percentages and medians. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of the 22 patients studied [males =8 and females =14; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1 or 2 =7 and ECOG 3 or 4 =15], 45.5% were on 40 mg OD, 31.8% were on 80 mg every other day (EOD), and 22.7% on 40 mg EOD. First-line EGFR TKIs used included afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib. The ORR with lower doses of second-line osimertinib was 77.3%. Overall, the median PFS was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.6-11.4] and median OS was 13.0 months (95% CI: 9.4-16.6). In patients with ECOG 1 or 2, the median PFS was 18.0 months (95% CI: 5.8-30.2) and the median OS was not reached at the time of analysis. In patients with poor ECOG performance status of 3 and 4, good survival outcomes were also seen with a median PFS of 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.7-9.3) and median OS of 10.0 months (95% CI: 7.5-12.5). All AEs except one case of paronychia were Grade 1. There were no Grade 3 or 4 AEs. Conclusions: Treatment with low dose osimertinib demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients who failed first-line treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs due to T790M mutation.

The prognostic role of an optimal machine learning model based on clinical available indicators in HCC patients.

Although methods in diagnosis and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have made significant progress in the past decades, the overall survival (OS) of liver cancer is still disappointing. Machine learning models have several advantages over traditional cox models in prognostic prediction. This study aimed at designing an optimal panel and constructing an optimal machine learning model in predicting prognosis for HCC. A total of 941 HCC patients with completed survival data and preoperative clinical chemistry and immunology indicators from two medical centers were included. The OCC panel was designed by univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis. Subsequently, cox model and machine-learning models were established and assessed for predicting OS and PFS in discovery cohort and internal validation cohort. The best OCC model was validated in the external validation cohort and analyzed in different subgroups. In discovery, internal and external validation cohort, C-indexes of our optimal OCC model were 0.871 (95% CI, 0.863-0.878), 0.692 (95% CI, 0.667-0.717) and 0.648 (95% CI, 0.630-0.667), respectively; the 2-year AUCs of OCC model were 0.939 (95% CI, 0.920-0.959), 0.738 (95% CI, 0.667-0.809) and 0.725 (95% CI, 0.643-0.808), respectively. For subgroup analysis of HCC patients with HBV, aged less than 65, cirrhosis or resection as first therapy, C-indexes of our optimal OCC model were 0.772 (95% CI, 0.752-0.792), 0.769 (95% CI, 0.750-0.789), 0.855 (95% CI, 0.846-0.864) and 0.760 (95% CI, 0.741-0.778), respectively. In general, the optimal OCC model based on RSF algorithm shows prognostic guidance value in HCC patients undergoing individualized treatment.

Efficacy and safety of molecularly targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable or recurrent/metastatic oral cancer in Japan.

Background/purpose: For unresectable recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is the first-line therapy, depending on the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS). However, this is based on clinical studies of head and neck cancer, and few similar studies have been conducted on oral cancer alone. This study aimed to investigate the current status of pharmacotherapy for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic oral cancer. Materials and methods: Patients with unresectable or recurrent/metastatic oral cancer who received cetuximab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab as first-line treatment were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS 2 (PFS2), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and immune-related adverse events were obtained from medical records. Results: A total of 155 patients were enrolled from six hospitals. The ORR in the nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cetuximab groups was 17.2 %, 4.2 %, and 21.6 %, respectively, and the DCR was 37.9 %, 41.7 %, and 58.8 %, respectively. Median OS in nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cetuximab groups was 10.3, 9.5, and 11.1 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in survival among the three groups. The small number of cases and the retrospective nature of the study precluded the determination of the more effective first-line treatment among the three drugs. Conclusion: The current statuses of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cetuximab in unresectable recurrent metastatic oral cancer was reported.

Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of lung cancer patients with CPFE or COPD: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC) commonly occurs in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but comparative research is limited. This study examines clinical characteristics, treatments, and prognosis in LC patients with CPFE or COPD. METHODS: The retrospective study involved 75 lung cancer patients with CPFE and 182 with COPD. It analyzed clinical features, tumor pathology, pulmonary function, laboratory parameters, and treatment responses. RESULTS: Notable differences were found between the CPFE + LC and COPD + LC groups. Both groups were mostly elderly, male smokers. The CPFE + LC group had higher BMI and more adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, while COPD + LC had predominantly squamous cell carcinoma. CPFE + LC tumors were mostly in the lower lobes; COPD + LC's were in the upper lobes. The CPFE + LC group showed higher tumor metastasis rates, more paraseptal emphysema, and elevated levels of TG, CEA, NSE, and Killer T Cells. In advanced stages (IIIB-IV), the CPFE + LC group receiving first-line treatment had shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and a higher risk of progression or death than the COPD + LC group, regardless of whether it was non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC). No significant PFS difference was found within CPFE + LC between chemotherapy and immunotherapy, nor in immune-related adverse events between groups, with interstitial pneumonia being common. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes distinct lung cancer characteristics in CPFE or COPD patients, highlighting the need for tailored diagnostic and treatment approaches. It advocates for further research to improve care for this high-risk group.

Enfortumab vedotin-related cutaneous toxicity correlates with overall survival in patients with urothelial cancer: a retrospective experience.

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial cancer, consisting of a monomethyl auristatin E payload linked to a human monoclonal antibody targeting nectin-4. No validated biomarker predictive of or correlated with response exists for EV. Cutaneous toxicity is among the most common EV-related toxicities and typically emerges in early cycles. This retrospective experience of patients with urothelial cancer treated with EV monotherapy evaluated whether EV-related cutaneous toxicity correlated with improved outcomes including progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival and overall response rate (ORR). Patients and methods: Patients treated with EV monotherapy at Johns Hopkins were identified, and baseline characteristics, treatment, and toxicity details were extracted through chart review. Univariable Cox hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for assessing the effect of baseline patient characteristics and cutaneous toxicity in PFS and OS. Based on the univariable analysis and known risk factors, all subsequent analyses were adjusted for: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, visceral metastases at baseline, gender as well as EV dose, and weight to account for dosing differences. Multivariable Cox proportional HRs were used for comparing PFS and OS between patients with and without cutaneous toxicity, assessing toxicity and EV dose as a time-dependent variables. Adjusted p-values were calculated to compare ORR and disease control rate (DCR) between groups using the Poisson regression model. Results: Of the 78 patients analyzed, 42 (53.8%) experienced EV-related cutaneous toxicity that appeared early during treatment (median time to occurrence 0.5 months from EV initiation). Cutaneous toxicity correlated with significantly improved OS [HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25, 0.9; P = 0.0235], ORR (68.3% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.0033) and DCR (82.9% vs. 48.3%, P = 0.0122). Median PFS was numerically longer in the cutaneous toxicity group (6.3 vs. 1.7 months), although no significance was achieved in the multivariable analysis (HR, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.108; P = 0.0925). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, EV-related cutaneous toxicity was associated with improved patient outcomes. Confirming this observation and understanding its mechanism could lead to discovery of a new clinical biomarker of EV response that can emerge in the first cycle.

The interplay mechanism between IDH mutation, MGMT-promoter methylation, and PRMT5 activity in the progression of grade 4 astrocytoma: unraveling the complex triad theory.

Background: The dysregulation of Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and the subsequent production of 2-Hydroxyglutrate (2HG) may alter the expression of epigenetic proteins in Grade 4 astrocytoma. The interplay mechanism between IDH, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-promoter methylation, and protein methyltransferase proteins-5 (PRMT5) activity, with tumor progression has never been described. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 34 patients with G4 astrocytoma is classified into IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype tumors. Both groups were tested for MGMT-promoter methylation and PRMT5 through methylation-specific and gene expression PCR analysis. Inter-cohort statistical significance was evaluated. Results: Both IDH-mutant WHO grade 4 astrocytomas (n = 22, 64.7%) and IDH-wildtype glioblastomas (n = 12, 35.3%) had upregulated PRMT5 gene expression except in one case. Out of the 22 IDH-mutant tumors, 10 (45.5%) tumors showed MGMT-promoter methylation and 12 (54.5%) tumors had unmethylated MGMT. All IDH-wildtype tumors had unmethylated MGMT. There was a statistically significant relationship between MGMT-promoter methylation and IDH in G4 astrocytoma (p-value = 0.006). Statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) were also observed among all G4 astrocytomas that expressed PRMT5 and received either temozolomide (TMZ) or TMZ plus other chemotherapies, regardless of their IDH or MGMT-methylation status (p-value=0.0014). Specifically, IDH-mutant tumors that had upregulated PRMT5 activity and MGMT-promoter methylation, who received only TMZ, have exhibited longer PFS. Conclusions: The relationship between PRMT5, MGMT-promoter, and IDH is not tri-directional. However, accumulation of D2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), which partially activates 2-OG-dependent deoxygenase, may not affect their activities. In IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, the 2HG-2OG pathway is typically inactive, leading to PRMT5 upregulation. TMZ alone, compared to TMZ-plus, can increase PFS in upregulated PRMT5 tumors. Thus, using a PRMT5 inhibitor in G4 astrocytomas may help in tumor regression.

Safety and Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy with TreoMel 200 vs. TreoMel 140 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

(1) Background: Treosulfan and melphalan (TreoMel)-based high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has shown promising safety and efficacy as a conditioning regimen for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, despite intensive first-line induction treatment and upfront consolidation with HDCT and ASCT, AML relapse rates are still high, and further efforts are needed to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare two melphalan dose schedules in regard to the safety of TreoMel HDCT and patient outcomes. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of two melphalan dose schedules combined with standard-dose treosulfan in AML patients undergoing HDCT and ASCT at the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland, between August 2019 and August 2023. Patients received treosulfan 42 g/m2 combined with either melphalan 140 mg/m2 (TreoMel 140) or melphalan 200 mg/m2 (TreoMel 200). Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), as well as safety profile. (3) Results: We included a total of 51 AML patients: 31 (60.8%) received TreoMel 140 and 20 (39.2%) TreoMel 200. The patients' basal characteristics were comparable between both cohorts. No significant differences in the duration of hospitalization or the adverse event profile were identified. There were no statistically significant differences in relapse (0.45 vs. 0.30, p = 0.381) and mortality rates (0.42 vs. 0.15, p = 0.064) between the melphalan 140 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2 cohorts, nor for PFS (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.29-2.28, p = 0.70) or OS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.19-2.57, p = 0.59) for the TreoMel 140 vs. TreoMel 200 cohort. (4) Conclusions: A higher dose of melphalan (TreoMel 200) was well tolerated overall. No statistically significant differences for patient outcomes could be observed, possibly due to the relatively small patient cohort and the short follow-up. A longer follow-up and prospective randomized studies would be required to confirm the safety profile and clinical benefit.

CAR-T cell therapy: Efficacy in management of cancers, adverse effects, dose-limiting toxicities and long-term follow up.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a groundbreaking and highly promising approach for the management of cancer. This paper reviews the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in the treatment of various hematological malignancies, also, with a mention of its effect on solid tumors, for which they have not received FDA approval yet. Different common and uncommon side effects are also discussed in this paper, with attention to the effect of each drug separately. By reviewing the recommendations of the FDA for CAR-T therapy research, we have extensively discussed dose-limiting toxicities. This further highlights the need for precise dosing strategies, striking a balance between therapeutic benefits and potential risks. Additionally, we reviewed the long-term follow-up of patients receiving CAR-T therapy to gain valuable insights into response durability and late-onset effects.

Real-World Data Analysis of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy-A Patient-Centric Single Center Study.

BACKGROUND: The quest to comprehend the real-world efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKis) in breast cancer continues, as patient responses vary significantly. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated CDKi use outside the trial condition from November 2016 to May 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), short-term and prolonged treatment benefit (≥4 and ≥10 months), as well as prognostic and predictive markers were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Out of 86 identified patients, 58 (67.4%) had treatment failure of which 40 (46.5%) were due to progression. Median PFS and TTF were 12 and 8.5 months, respectively. A total of 57 (66.3%) and 42 (48.8%) patients experienced short-term and prolonged treatment benefit. Independent, significant predictors for PFS were progesterone receptor expression (HR: 0.88), multiple metastatic sites (HR: 2.56), and hepatic metastasis (HR: 2.01). Significant predictors for TTF were PR expression (HR: 0.86), multiple sites (HR: 3.29), adverse events (HR: 2.35), and diabetes (HR: 2.88). Aside from tumor biology and adverse events, treatment modifications like pausing and switching of CDKi were predictive for short-term (OR: 6.73) and prolonged (OR: 14.27) therapeutic benefit, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the importance of tailored treatment strategies, highlighting the role of PR expression, metastatic burden, and therapeutic adjustments in optimizing patient outcomes in real-world breast cancer management.

Prognostic Value of HHLA2 in Patients with Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis.

HHLA2 is a checkpoint from the B7 family that can play a co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory role in cancer, depending on the binding receptor. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the relationship between HHLA2 levels and its impact on the prognosis of patients with solid cancers. The study used data from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WOS), Cochrane and SCOPUS databases. The R studio software was used for the data analysis. The study assessed overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) by pooling appropriate hazard ratios (HR). Eighteen studies (2880 patients' data) were included. High expression of HHLA2 was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.03), shorter RFS (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.38-2.77) and worse DFS (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.01-2.09) in patients with solid cancers. The current study suggests that high expression of HHLA2 is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with solid cancers.

Outcomes of extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy for induced oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer on novel systemic therapy.

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is often delivered in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD). However, the specific subset of patients with polymetastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on novel systemic therapies who develop induced oligopersistant disease (OpersisD) or oligoprogressive disease (OprogD), as defined by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OMD classification, has not been well described. This study explores the outcomes of patients treated with this strategy. Methods: Patients with stage IV NSCLC being treated with osimertinib or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) who received extracranial SBRT for OpersisD or OprogD were identified in our retrospective analysis. Outcomes reported include progression-free survival (PFS), time to change of systemic treatment (TTCST), overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Forty-nine patients received SBRT for OpersisD (34.7%) or OprogD (65.3%) at a median of 5.8 and 15.3 months after start of systemic therapy, respectively. 55.1% received concurrent osimertinib and 44.9% received ICI. Seventy-seven extracranial lesions were treated with various fractionation schemas. At a median of 18.8 months follow-up from first SBRT, LC was achieved in 92.2% of total lesions treated (71). The 1-year OS was 91.7% for OpersisD and 83.3% for OprogD. OpersisD compared to OprogD had a longer median PFS (18.3 vs. 6.1 months) and longer median TTCST (23.6 vs. 13.5 months), median OS was not reached for either cohort. On multivariate analysis, patients treated with osimertinib had shorter PFS (HR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.01-4.82; P=0.048) and shorter TTCST (HR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.09-7.33; P=0.032). One patient (2%) experienced grade 3 pneumonitis after SBRT, and no grade 4-5 toxicities were reported with SBRT treatment. Conclusions: This study indicates that SBRT for OpersisD or OprogD in Stage IV NSCLC patients on osimertinib or ICIs is safe, very well tolerated, and may prolong the time before needing a shift in systemic therapy. Further prospective research is needed to validate and expand upon these findings.

Nomograms for predicting prognostic value of combined neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and SCC-Ag in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Background: Accumulating evidence supports the important role of inflammation in tumorigenesis and progression. Squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (SCC-Ag) is a tumor marker widely used to predict the prognosis of patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma. This paper explored the predictive value of combined detection of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to SCC-Ag for prognosis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 190 LACC patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) from January 2012 to December 2016. NLR and SCC-Ag were analyzed before treatment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine the optimal cutoff point for NLR and SCC-Ag. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess their prognostic values. Nomograms were established to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was introduced to evaluate the accuracy of predictions. Results: The optimal cutoff values for SCC-Ag and NLR were 3.25 ng/mL and 2.52, respectively. Patients with SCC-Ag >3.25 ng/mL and NLR >2.52 were significantly associated with decreased PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis indicated that SCC-Ag and NLR were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P=0.022 and P=0.004, respectively) and OS (P=0.031 and P=0.001, respectively). The area under the curve of SCC-Ag, NLR and their combination to predict PFS and OS of LACC were 0.688, 0.623, 0.708 and 0.684, 0.658, 0.723, respectively. C-index of nomograms based on PFS and OS were 0.725 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.653-0.797] and 0.731 (95% CI: 0.658-0.804), respectively. Conclusions: The combination of SCC-Ag and NLR could provide a better predictive prognosis than SCC-Ag or NLR alone, and nomograms based on PFS and OS can be recommended as practical models for evaluating the prognosis of LACC patients.

Regorafenib combined with a PD-1 inhibitor in the second-line setting for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice.

Background: Most advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases administered molecular targeted agents and/or anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have no response or develop resistance. Moreover, second-line therapies still cannot provide beneficial clinical outcomes. A pilot study assessing combined regorafenib and PD-1 inhibitor as second-line treatment of advanced HCC reported promising effectiveness. Methods: The current single-center, retrospective, real-world study was carried out between January 2019 and July 2021. Advanced HCC cases were administered second-line regorafenib combined with a PD-1 inhibitor or regorafenib alone were assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were determined. Results: Totally 46 HCC cases were analyzed, most of whom underwent previous systemic treatment comprising targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated in 25 and 21 individuals in the regorafenib + PD-1 inhibitor and regorafenib monotherapy groups, respectively: ORRs were 21.7% and 8.7%, and DCRs were 47.8% and 32.6%, respectively. Median PFS was markedly longer in the regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitor group (11.5 months) compared with the regorafenib monotherapy group (5.1 months, P=0.049). Conclusions: This study suggested regorafenib and a PD-1 inhibitor in combination may provide significant clinical benefits in HCC cases showing progression following first-line treatment. Further analysis in real-world studies with large cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.

Predictive impact of sarcopenia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective study.

Background: Sarcopenia, characterised by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass and reduced strength and function, is frequently observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the relationship between sarcopenia and the prognosis of NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. This aimed to assess whether sarcopenia is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICIs. Methods: For this retrospective cohort study, we analysed the medical records of patients attending our hospital aged 18-75 years who were newly diagnosed with stage IIIB to stage IV NSCLC, and who had received ICIs as first- or second-line therapy between May 2019 and April 2022. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated from computed tomography (CT) images and relevant clinical characteristics within 4 weeks of initiating treatment and used to diagnose sarcopenia status. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare patients' progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine the associations between sarcopenia and survival outcomes. The chi-square test was used to compare treatment response outcomes, such as the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs), between individuals with and without sarcopenia. Additionally, the Student's t-test was utilised to compare SMI values between patients by their objective response (OR) and disease control (DC). Finally, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare nutritional and inflammatory indicators between the sarcopenia groups. Results: The study enrolled 70 patients, of whom 34 (48.6%) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The median PFS of patients with and without sarcopenia was 7.5 vs. 13.4 months, respectively (p = 0.006). The proportional hazards regression analysis showed sarcopenia to be an independent prognostic factor for shorter PFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.504, 95% CI: 0.265-0.962, p = 0.038). Using chi square tests, we found significant differences in the ORR (20.59% vs. 58.33%, p = 0.001) and occurrence of any irAEs (44.1% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.028) between the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups, respectively. The Student's t-test showed a significant difference in SMI between the ORR group and the non-ORR group (49.99 ± 7.00 vs. 42.98 ± 2.18 cm2/m2, p = 0.0015). While the sarcopenia group were with significantly a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratios and a higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level (p = 0.026, p = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions: This study found that sarcopenia is a significant predictor of a poor prognosis for patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICIs. Multiple inflammatory and immune functions related to prognosis also differ by sarcopenia status.

Mutation profile in liquid biopsy tested by next generation sequencing in Mexican patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma and its impact on survival.

Background: Lung cancer represents a significant global health concern, often diagnosed in its advanced stages. The advent of massive DNA sequencing has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment by enabling the identification of target mutations and the development of tailored therapeutic approaches. Unfortunately, access to DNA sequencing technology remains limited in many developing countries. In this context, we emphasize the critical importance of integrating this advanced technology into healthcare systems in developing nations to improve treatment outcomes. Methods: We conducted an analysis of electronic clinical records of patients with confirmed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a verified negative status for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. These patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) for molecular analysis. We performed descriptive statistical analyses for each variable and conducted both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses to assess their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, we classified genetic mutations as actionable or non-actionable based on the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale of Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines. Results: Our study included a total of 127 patients, revealing the presence of twenty-one distinct mutations. The most prevalent mutations were EGFR (18.9%) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) (15.7%). Notably, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.258, P<0.001], tumor mutation burden (TMB) (HR: 2.073, P=0.042) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (HR: 0.470, P=0.032) demonstrated statistical significance in both the univariate and multivariate analyses with respect to PFS. In terms of OS, ALK (HR: 0.285, P<0.001) and EGFR (HR: 0.482, P=0.024) exhibited statistical significance in both analyses. Applying the ESCAT classification system, we identified actionable genomic variations (ESCAT level-1), including EGFR, ALK, breast cancer (BRAF) gene, c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), and rearranged during transfection (RET) gene, in 32.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our findings from massive DNA sequencing underscore that 32.3% of patients who test negative for the EGFR mutation possess other targetable mutations, enabling them to receive personalized, targeted therapies at an earlier stage of their disease. Implementing massive DNA sequencing in developing countries is crucial to enhance survival rates among NSCLC patients and guide more effective treatment strategies.

MGMT in TMZ-based glioma therapy: Multifaceted insights and clinical trial perspectives.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is the most preferred and approved chemotherapeutic drug for either first- or second-line chemotherapy for glioma patients across the globe. In glioma patients, resistance to treatment with alkylating drugs like TMZ is known to be conferred by exalted levels of MGMT gene expression. On the contrary, epigenetic silencing through MGMT gene promoter methylation leading to subsequent reduction in MGMT transcription and protein expression, is predicted to have a response favoring TMZ treatment. Thus, MGMT protein level in cancer cells is a crucial determining factor in indicating and predicting the choice of alkylating agents in chemotherapy or choosing glioma patients directly for a second line of treatment. Thus, in-depth research is necessary to achieve insights into MGMT gene regulation that has recently enticed a fascinating interest in epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational levels. Furthermore, MGMT promoter methylation, stability of MGMT protein, and related subsequent adaptive responses are also important contributors to strategic developments in glioma therapy. With applications to its identification as a prognostic biomarker, thus predicting response to advanced glioma therapy, this review aims to concentrate on the mechanistic role and regulation of MGMT gene expression at epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational levels functioning under the control of multiple signaling dynamics.

Attitudes of healthcare professionals and drug regulators about progression-free survival as endpoint in the advanced cancer setting.

PURPOSE: To describe the attitudes of healthcare professionals and drug regulators about progression-free survival (PFS) as efficacy endpoint in clinical trials with patients with advanced cancer and to explore to what extent these attitudes influence the willingness to trade between PFS and toxicity. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey with regulators from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and healthcare professionals (HCP) from the "Stichting Hemato-Oncologie voor Volwassenen Nederland" (HOVON) collaborative group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Attitudes towards PFS were elicited using 5-point Likert items. The respondents' willingness to trade between PFS and grade 3 or 4 (G34) toxicity was assessed using the threshold technique and quantified in terms of their maximum acceptable risk (MAR). RESULTS: Responses were collected from 287 HCPs and 64 regulators with mainly clinical expertise. Attitudes towards PFS were often spread out in both groups and related to beliefs about PFS being a likely surrogate for clinical benefit, being an intrinsic benefit to be distinguished from OS, or on the importance given to OS. Being a regulator or holding stronger beliefs about PFS being a likely surrogate or an intrinsic benefit were associated with a higher MAR. Presence of a supportive trend in OS was stated as important but was not associated with MAR. There was agreement on the need to address bias in the adjudication of PFS and the need for improving communication to patients about meaning, strengths, and limitations of improvements in PFS. CONCLUSION: Attitudes towards PFS were spread out and were associated with individual differences in the willingness to trade between toxicity and PFS. There was agreement on the need to address bias in the adjudication of PFS and improving communication to patients.

Fruquintinib in combination with sintilimab or TAS-102 as third-line or above treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study.

Background: For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the efficacy of third-line or above treatments is not ideal. Combining targeted vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) biological agents with chemotherapy or anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) treatment can bring longer survival benefits to patients with mCRC compared with the application of a single drug. In this study, fruquintinib was used as the research drug, and the main purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in combination with sintilimab (FS) or trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) (FT) in the third-line or above treatment in mCRC patients. Methods: Based on real-world clinical practice, mCRC patients who progressed after second-line or higher-line chemotherapy regimens and received FS or FT as third-line or above treatment from December 2020 to November 2022 were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Safety, disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary end points. Results: In the FS group, 47 patients received FS, and in the FT group, 45 patients received FT. The DCR values in the FS and FT groups were 80.9% (38/47) and 55.6% (25/45), respectively (P<0.05). The median PFS (mPFS) in the FS group was 6.0 months, and the mPFS in the FT group was 3.5 months (P<0.05). Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2 in severity. Conclusions: As a third-line or above regimen in mCRC patients, compared to FT, treatment with FS provides a higher DCR and longer mPFS and is better tolerated. The combination of fruquintinib and sintilimab may become a new treatment option for mCRC patients.

A retrospective pilot study of transarterial chemoembolisation using camrelizumab-eluting Callisphere beads for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of initial hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolisation using camrelizumab-eluting Callisphere beads (camrelizumab-DEB-TACE) for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Enrolment included patients with unresectable HCC who underwent camrelizumab-DEB-TACE treatment from September 2021 to February 2023. The assessment included the examination of tumour response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the monitoring of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included in the study. The objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 55.0% and 90.0% at 1 month and 57.9% and 78.9% at 3 months, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 15.5 months months, respectively. Among the 21 patients, 4 underwent more than 2 procedures of camrelizumab-DEB-TACE, with a mean of 1.9 ± 1.1 procedures (range: 1-4) per patient. No severe complications or treatment-related mortalities were observed. In addition, no patient developed severe AEs related to camrelizumab, such as reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, immune-related pneumonia, or immune-related myocarditis. Nineteen patients experienced at least one type of AEs related to DEB-TACE, with abdominal pain (n = 16, 76.2%) being the most prevalent AE. CONCLUSION: Camrelizumab-DEB-TACE demonstrated effectiveness and safety as a treatment for unresectable HCC, with no occurrence of severe camrelizumab-related AEs.

The prognostic value of a combined immune score in tumor and immune cells assessed by immunohistochemistry in triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a novel combined immune score (CIS)-based model assessing prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: The expression of eight immune markers (PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, IDO, TIM3, OX40, OX40L, and H7-H2) was assessed with immunohistochemistry on the tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) of 227 TNBC cases, respectively, and subsequently associated with selected clinicopathological parameters and survival. Data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were further examined to validate our findings. RESULTS: All immune markers were often expressed in TCs and ICs, except for PD-1 which was not expressed in TCs. In ICs, the expression of all immune markers was positively correlated between one another, except between PD-L1 and OX40, also TIM3 and OX40. In ICs, PD-1, PD-L1, and OX40L positive expression was associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.040, p = 0.020, and p = 0.020, respectively). In TCs, OX40 positive expression was associated with a shorter PFS (p = 0.025). Subsequently, the TNBC patients were classified into high and low combined immune score groups (CIS-H and CIS-L), based on the expression levels of a selection of biomarkers in TCs (TCIS-H or TCIS-L) and ICs (ICIS-H or ICIS-L). The TCIS-H group was significantly associated with a longer PFS (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the ICIS-H group was additionally associated with a longer PFS (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.001), at significant levels. In the multivariate analysis, both TCIS-H and ICIS-H groups were identified as independent predictors of favorable PFS (p = 0.012 and p = 0.001, respectively). ICIS-H was also shown to be an independent predictor of favorable OS (p = 0.003). The analysis of the mRNA expression data from TCGA also validated our findings regarding TNBC. CONCLUSION: Our novel TCIS and ICIS exhibited a significant prognostic value in TNBC. Additional research would be needed to strengthen our findings and identify the most efficient prognostic and predictive biomarkers for TNBC patients.