Antifungal activity of propafenone on Candida spp. strains: interaction with antifungals and possible mechanism of action.

Introduction. The development of new antifungal drugs has become a global priority, given the increasing cases of fungal diseases together with the rising resistance to available antifungal drugs. In this scenario, drug repositioning has emerged as an alternative for such development, with advantages such as reduced research time and costs.Gap statement. Propafenone is an antiarrhythmic drug whose antifungal activity is poorly described, being a good candidate for further study.Aim. This study aims to evaluate propafenone activity against different species of Candida spp. to evaluate its combination with standard antifungals, as well as its possible action mechanism.Methodology. To this end, we carried out tests against strains of Candida albicans, Candida auris, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata and Candida krusei based on the evaluation of the MIC, minimum fungicidal concentration and tolerance level, along with checkerboard and flow cytometry tests with clinical strains and cell structure analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results. The results showed that propafenone has a 50% MIC ranging from 32 to 256 µg ml-1, with fungicidal activity and positive interactions with itraconazole in 83.3% of the strains evaluated. The effects of the treatments observed by SEM were extensive damage to the cell structure, while flow cytometry revealed the apoptotic potential of propafenone against Candida spp.Conclusion. Taken together, these results indicate that propafenone has the potential for repositioning as an antifungal drug.

A Rare Case of Deglutition-Induced Atrial Fibrillation Secondary to Esophageal Dilation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the world. However, deglutition-induced tachyarrhythmias are exceptionally rare. Diagnosis relies on a documented history, Holter monitoring and echocardiograms. The mechanism underlying deglutition-induced tachycardia remains uncertain, with leading hypotheses suggesting mechanical left atrial stimulation after esophageal distention or activation of the vagus nerve due to increased intra-esophageal pressure. Lifestyle changes, medications (e.g., beta-blockers and antiarrhythmics), and radiofrequency catheter ablation are viable treatment options. First-line treatment is usually beta-blockers, but they have limited effectiveness due to the poorly understood mechanisms behind this pathological condition. Sodium channel blockers targeting vagal motor fibers decrease esophageal muscle contraction force by reducing axonal transmission, supporting the theory that inhibiting rapid sodium channels may mitigate atrial tachycardias. This mechanism presents a promising approach for managing deglutition-induced atrial fibrillation. We present a unique case of a 58-year-old female diagnosed with deglutition-induced atrial fibrillation secondary to esophageal dilation who was successfully treated with the antiarrhythmic propafenone, supporting the vagus nerve hypothesis.

A Tissue Distribution Study of Propafenone in an Intentional Fatal Poisoning Case.

Propafenone (PPF) belongs to the class 1C antiarrhythmics and can cause electrocardiogram-associated adverse/toxic effects. Cases of PPF intoxication are rarely investigated. We developed a novel and selective GC-MS/MS method for the determination of PPF and its tissue distribution in an intentional fatal poisoning case, which is applicable to PPF quantification in the range of therapeutic to lethal concentrations in complex post-mortem samples. A simple and effective sample pretreatment was applied to all analyzed samples. PPF was determined without the need for dilution, even in highly complex samples containing a wide range of analyte concentrations. Quantification was performed using the standard addition method, developed and validated according to the ICH M10 guidelines. The obtained results indicated that the PPF concentration in the serum from blood taken while alive, before therapy, was the highest ever reported in the literature. Despite the intensive therapy after the patients' admission, the PPF concentrations in the lungs, spleen, femoral blood and cardiac blood were fatal or abnormally high. On the other hand, the concentrations in the liver and skeletal muscle were lower or approximately the same as observed in cases with therapeutic doses. To the best of our knowledge, the distribution of PPF has not been investigated in fatal intoxication cases and can be helpful in clinical or forensic toxicology.

Effectiveness of antazoline versus amiodarone, flecainide and propafenone in restoring sinus rhythm at the emergency department.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the effectiveness of pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) with antazoline in comparison to flecainide. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of antazoline in restoring sinus rhythm (SR) versus amiodarone, flecainide and propafenone in a group of emergency department (ED) patients. MATERIALS/METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective analysis of patient records from an ED in a large hospital in Poland. We analysed a total of 1878 patient records, divided based on the anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) administered during PCV: antazoline (n â€‹= â€‹1080), antazoline â€‹+ â€‹ß-blocker (n â€‹= â€‹479), amiodarone (n â€‹= â€‹129), flecainide (n â€‹= â€‹102), propafenone (n â€‹= â€‹88). Of the patients, 63.5 â€‹% were female (median 65 years, [19-100]). RESULTS: The percentage of successful PCV was significantly higher in the antazoline group (84.3 â€‹%) than in the antazoline â€‹+ â€‹ß-blocker (75.8 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.0001), propafenone (75.6 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.0364) and amiodarone (68.8 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.0001) groups. Post-hoc analysis revealed that patients who received PCV with antazoline, antazoline â€‹+ â€‹ß-blocker, flecainide and propafenone had significantly shorter time to SR than those who received amiodarone (p â€‹< â€‹0.0001). Univariate regression analysis revealed that patients who underwent PCV with antazoline were almost twice as likely to return to SR compared to the other groups (p â€‹< â€‹0.0001, OR 1.81, 95 â€‹% CI 1.44-2.27). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing the effectiveness of antazoline in PCV versus flecainide in addition to the previously studied amiodarone and propafenone. Our results indicate that antazoline is more effective in restoring SR than amiodarone, flecainide and propafenone. In addition, antazoline restored SR significantly faster than amiodarone or propafenone.

Comparison of efficacy of pharmacological cardioversion with antazoline and propafenone versus electrical cardioversion in atrial fibrillation during cryoablation.

Introduction: Antazoline with propafenone may be an alternative to electrical cardioversion (ECV) in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including during balloon cryoablation. Aim: To compare the efficacy of antazoline with propafenone and ECV in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm at discharge in patients with AF during cryoablation with special regard to type of AF. Material and methods: The study retrospectively analyzed 196 patients who underwent elective cryoablation. Eighty-nine patients who developed AF in the perioperative period were selected as the study group (32 women and 57 men). The study group was divided into two groups - 46 (51.7%) patients were given pharmacological cardioversion with 70 mg of propafenone and 100 or 200 mg of antazoline, whereas the other 43 (48.3%) patients underwent ECV. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding: left atrial area, left atrium diameter, right atrial area and right atrium diameter. In the overall population, ECV was more effective than antazoline with propafenone therapy (31 [72.1%] vs. 20 [43.5%]; p = 0.01). A similar relationship was demonstrated in patients with persistent AF (13 [59.1%] vs. 3 [12.5%]; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the group of patients with paroxysmal AF (18 (85.6%) vs. 17 (77.3%); p = 0.7). Conclusions: In AF during the cryoablation procedure ECV appears to be more effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm at discharge than antazoline with propafenone in the general AF patient population, especially in patients with persistent AF.

Case Report: Ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy improved by the pharmacologic suppression of ventricular preexcitation in three infants, and literature review.

The therapy of ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy in very small infants or infants with a high risk of ablation is tough and related articles are rare. Effective pharmacotherapy to suppress ventricular preexcitation is valuable. Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization in infants with ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods and results: Three infants with ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy, due to the disappearance of ventricular preexcitation during the placement of catheter, intermittent WPW pattern, and right mid septal accessory pathway respectively, had received pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization. The initial dosage of oral amiodarone was 5 mg/kg.d and it was followed by the maintenance dosage of 2-2.5 mg/kg.d 4 weeks later. Propafenone (15 mg/kg.d) served as a supplement since amiodarone was not adequate in case 3. The three infants achieved successful pharmacologic suppression of ventricular preexcitation 10, 6.5, and 4.5 weeks after the initiation of amiodarone respectively. They all got normalized contraction of interventricular septum and LVEF as well as reduced LVEDD gradually after the disappearance of ventricular preexcitation. No side effects associated with pharmacotherapy happened during the follow-up. Amiodarone had been withdrawn for 2 years and 5 months in Cases 1 and 2. They both remained free from ventricular preexcitation and retained normal LVEF and LVEDD. Conclusions: Pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization with oral amiodarone or in combination with propafenone for infants with ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy is effective and safe. Pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization served as another therapeutic choice besides ablation.

A case of lethal suicidal intoxication with propafenone and diazepam.

Diazepam poisoning is a common emergency situation, but propafenone poisoning is relatively rare. We reported a case of propafenone poisoning combined with diazepam. An 18-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital with an overdose of oral propafenone and diazepam. The patient was treated with medication that proved to be useful, but the sinus rhythm could not be recovered, and cardiac arrest occurred. A bipolar temporary pacemaker and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were installed. However, even with multiple electrode positions, effective capture could not be achieved. The patient eventually died. We should be alert to the possibility of co-poisoning.

Association between amiodarone use and risk of cataract: a population-based active-comparator study.

BACKGROUND: Despite previous concerns about ocular side effects related to amiodarone, the relationship between amiodarone and cataract remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the potential association between amiodarone use and the subsequent risk of cataract, taking into account potential confounders. METHODS: This population-based, active comparator-controlled cohort study utilized the data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance program and involved adults over 40 years old between 2001 and 2013. We analyzed 12 055 new amiodarone users and contrasted them with a propafenone user cohort. The primary outcome was the incidence of cataract. Inverse-probability treatment-weighting (IPTW) was further used to eliminate the potential confounding effects, and Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were performed to calculate the risk of cataract. Serial subgroup analyses were also performed. RESULTS: In the main analysis, amiodarone users did not exhibit a significant causal relationship in both full cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.994, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913-1.082] and IPTW cohort (IPTW-aHR 0.977, 95% CI: 0.900-1.060). Furthermore, it is important to highlight a significantly reduced risk of cataract among patients with heart failure (IPTW-aHR 0.708, 95% CI: 0.554-0.905) and during the 2-year follow-up period (IPTW-aHR 0.889, 95% CI: 0.794-0.996), implying potential advantages linked to the use of amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: The study found no increased risk of cataract with amiodarone, one of the most frequently used antiarrhythmic medications, compared to the use of propafenone. Future research is recommended to explore potential mechanisms and their implications for clinical practice.

The outcomes of patients with septic shock treated with propafenone compared to amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias are related to end-systolic left atrial volume.

AIMS: A recently published trial has shown no differences in outcomes between patients with new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) in septic shock treated with either propafenone or amiodarone. However, these outcome data have not been evaluated in relation to the presence or absence of a dilated left atrium (LA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with SVA and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 35% were randomized to receive intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). They were divided into groups based on whether their end-systolic left atrial volume (LAVI) was ≥40 mL/m². The subgroup outcomes assessed were survival at ICU discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Propafenone cardioverted earlier (P = 0.009) and with fewer recurrences (P = 0.001) in the patients without LA enlargement (n = 133). Patients with LAVI < 40 mL/m2 demonstrated a mortality benefit of propafenone over the follow-up of 1 year [Cox regression, hazard ratio (HR) 0.6 (95% CI 0.4; 0.9), P = 0.014]. Patients with dilated LA (n = 37) achieved rhythm control earlier in amiodarone (P = 0.05) with similar rates of recurrences (P = 0.5) compared to propafenone. The outcomes for patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m2 were less favourable with propafenone compared to amiodarone at 1 month [HR 3.6 (95% CI 1.03; 12.5), P = 0.045]; however, it did not reach statistical significance at 1 year [HR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8; 4.4), P = 0.138]. CONCLUSION: Patients with non-dilated LA who achieved rhythm control with propafenone in the setting of septic shock had better short-term and long-term outcomes than those treated with amiodarone, which seemed to be more effective in patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m². TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03029169, registered on 24 January 2017.

Brugada-like Electrocardiographic Changes Induced by Propafenone:a Case Report / 中国循环杂志

Brugada syndrome presents mainly in adulthood,and sudden death occurs mainly at rest or during sleep.It is uncommon in childhood,especially with atrial flutter as the first manifestation.In this article,we report a case of a 13-year-old child with atrial flutter as the first manifestation,without underlying cardiac disease,who developed Brugada-like electrocardiographic changes during the treatment of propafenone,and genetic testing revealed the suspected mutant genes SCN5A(c.2834A＞G[p.D945G]).Present case and related literature review might improve the awareness of clinicians on the inducing factors of Brugada syndrome and related a variety of cardiac arrhythmias,the importance of electrocardiogram monitoring during the application of antiarrhythmic drugs,and provide guidance and close follow-up strategies to this high-risk group,so as to avoid the occurrence of adverse events in these patients.

Antiarrhythmic drugs for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and sex differences: Insights from the CANT II Study.

BACKGROUND: Data on sex differences in terms of action of antiarrhythmic agents (AADs) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical profile of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and efficacy and safety of AADs used for pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) of AF. METHODS: This research was a sub-analysis of the retrospective multicenter Cardioversion with ANTazoline II (CANT) registry, which comprised 1365 patients with short-duration AF referred for urgent PCV with the use of AAD. Patients were categorized according to and compared in terms of clinical parameters and PCV outcomes. The primary endpoint was return of sinus rhythm within 12 hours after drug infusion, and the composite safety endpoint involved bradycardia <45 bpm, hypotension, syncope, or death. RESULTS: The sex distribution of patients qualified for PCV was even (men, n = 725; 53.1%). Females were older and more symptomatic and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, higher prevalence of tachyarrhythmia, and higher use of chronic anticoagulation. The overall efficacy (71.4% vs. 70.1%; P = 0.59) and safety (5.2% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.60) of PCV was comparable in men and women. Amiodarone (68.3% vs. 65.9%; P = 0.66) and antazoline (77.1% vs. 80.0%; P = 0.19) had similar efficacy in men and women, but propafenone had a lower rate of rhythm conversion in men (64.7% vs. 79.3%; P = 0.046). None of the assessed AADs differed in terms of safety profile in both sexes. CONCLUSION: Female patients with AF have different clinical profiles but similar efficacy and safety of AADs as compared to male participants. Propafenone has significantly lower efficacy in men, which requires further investigation.

Reassessing the Safety of Pill-in-the-Pocket Propafenone.

The current guidelines state that propafenone can be used in combination with a beta-blocker or a calcium channel blocker for pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients without structural heart disease. To prevent the conversion from atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter with a rapid ventricular rate, it is recommended to administer propafenone following the administration of a beta-blocker or a calcium channel blocker. However, this combination carries the potential risk of cardiogenic shock. There are several scenarios where this combination can lead to shock, attributed to the variable pharmacokinetics of propafenone among individuals and its significant drug interactions with commonly used AV nodal blockers, such as metoprolol and diltiazem. Additionally, a significant proportion of the population has genetic polymorphisms that affect the metabolism of these medications. While pill-in-the-pocket propafenone is also employed in outpatient settings, unexpected severe and life-threatening reactions have been reported. In this context, we present a case report of severe propafenone toxicity in a closely monitored inpatient setting aimed at converting atrial fibrillation.

Medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in young patients with and without congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success. METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success. RESULTS: We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.

Amiodarone but not propafenone impairs bioenergetics and autophagy of human myocardial cells.

Cardiac and extra-cardiac side effects of common antiarrhythmic agents might be related to drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Supratherapeutic doses of amiodarone have been shown to impair mitochondria in animal studies, whilst influence of propafenone on cellular bioenergetics is unknown. We aimed to assess effects of protracted exposure to pharmacologically relevant doses of amiodarone and propafenone on cellular bioenergetics and mitochondrial biology of human and mouse cardiomyocytes. In this study, HL-1 mouse atrial cardiomyocytes and primary human cardiomyocytes derived from the ventricles of the adult heart were exposed to 2 and 7 µg/mL of either amiodarone or propafenone. After 24 h, extracellular flux analysis and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to measure mitochondrial functions. Autophagy was assessed by western blots and live-cell imaging of lysosomes. In human cardiomyocytes, amiodarone significantly reduced mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP production, in association with an inhibition of fatty acid oxidation and impaired complex I- and II-linked respiration in the electron transport chain. Expectedly, this led to increased anaerobic glycolysis. Amiodarone increased the production of reactive oxygen species and autophagy was also markedly affected. In contrast, propafenone-exposed cardiomyocytes did not exert any impairment of cellular bioenergetics. Similar changes after amiodarone treatment were observed during identical experiments performed on HL-1 mouse cardiomyocytes, suggesting a comparable pharmacodynamics of amiodarone among mammalian species. In conclusion, amiodarone but not propafenone in near-therapeutic concentrations causes a pattern of mitochondrial dysfunction with affected autophagy and metabolic switch from oxidative metabolism to anaerobic glycolysis in human cardiomyocytes.

Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Acute onset supraventricular arrhythmias can contribute to haemodynamic compromise in septic shock. Both amiodarone and propafenone are available interventions, but their clinical effects have not yet been directly compared. METHODS: In this two-centre, prospective controlled parallel group double blind trial we recruited 209 septic shock patients with new-onset arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. The patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who had sinus rhythm 24 h after the start of the infusion, time to restoration of the first sinus rhythm and the proportion of patients with arrhythmia recurrence. RESULTS: Out of 209 randomized patients, 200 (96%) received the study drug. After 24 h, 77 (72.8%) and 71 (67.3%) were in sinus rhythm (p = 0.4), restored after a median of 3.7 h (95% CI 2.3-6.8) and 7.3 h (95% CI 5-11), p = 0.02, with propafenone and amiodarone, respectively. The arrhythmia recurred in 54 (52%) patients treated with propafenone and in 80 (76%) with amiodarone, p < 0.001. Patients with a dilated left atrium had better rhythm control with amiodarone (6.4 h (95% CI 3.5; 14.1) until cardioversion vs 18 h (95% CI 2.8; 24.7) in propafenone, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Propafenone does not provide better rhythm control at 24 h yet offers faster cardioversion with fewer arrhythmia recurrences than with amiodarone, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No differences between propafenone and amiodarone on the prespecified short- and long-term outcomes were observed.

Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation concomitantly treated with antiarrhythmic drugs and non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants.

AIMS: Limited data compared antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) with concomitant non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients, hence the aim of the study. METHODS AND RESULTS: National health insurance database were retrieved during 2012-17 for study. We excluded patients not taking AADs, bradycardia, heart block, heart failure admission, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valve, incomplete demographic data, and follow-up <3 months. Outcomes were compared in Protocol 1, dronedarone vs. non-dronedarone; Protocol 2, dronedarone vs. amiodarone; and Protocol 3, dronedarone vs. propafenone. Outcomes were acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (including AMI, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). In Protocol 1, 2298 dronedarone users and 6984 non-dronedarone users (amiodarone = 4844; propafenone = 1914; flecainide = 75; sotalol = 61) were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with lower ICH (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38-0.99, P = 0.0436), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.16-0.37, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.42, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.70, P < 0.0001). In Protocol 2, 2231 dronedarone users and 6693 amiodarone users were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with significantly lower ICH (HR = 0.53, 95%=CI 0.33-0.84, P = 0.0078), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.13-0.31, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.34, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.66, P < 0.0001), compared with amiodarone. In Protocol 3, 812 dronedarone users and 2436 propafenone users were analysed. There were no differences between two drugs for primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of dronedarone with NOACs was associated with cardiovascular benefits in an Asian population, compared with non-dronedarone AADs and amiodarone.

Drug repurposing of propafenone to discover novel anti-tumor agents by impairing homologous recombination to delay DNA damage recovery of rare disease conjunctival melanoma.

Conjunctival melanoma (CM), a rare and fatal malignant ocular tumor, lacks proper diagnostic biomarkers and therapy. Herein, we revealed the novel application of propafenone, an FDA-approved antiarrhythmic medication, which was identified effective in inhibiting CM cells viability and homologous recombination pathway. Detailed structure-activity relationships generated D34 as one of the most promising derivatives, which strongly suppressed the proliferation, viability, and migration of CM cells at submicromolar concentrations. Mechanically, D34 had the potential to increase γ-H2AX nuclear foci and aggravated DNA damage by suppressing homologous recombination pathway and its factors, particularly the complex of MRE11-RAD50-NBS1. D34 bound to human recombinant MRE11 protein and inhibited its endonuclease activity. Moreover, D34 dihydrochloride significantly suppressed tumor growth in the CRMM1 NCG xenograft model without obvious toxicity. Our finding shows that propafenone derivatives modulating the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex will most likely provide an approach for CM targeted therapy, especially for improving chemo- and radio-sensitivity for CM patients.

Chronic Propafenone Application Increases Functional KIR2.1 Expression In Vitro.

Expression and activity of inwardly rectifying potassium (KIR) channels within the heart are strictly regulated. KIR channels have an important role in shaping cardiac action potentials, having a limited conductance at depolarized potentials but contributing to the final stage of repolarization and resting membrane stability. Impaired KIR2.1 function causes Andersen-Tawil Syndrome (ATS) and is associated with heart failure. Restoring KIR2.1 function by agonists of KIR2.1 (AgoKirs) would be beneficial. The class 1c antiarrhythmic drug propafenone is identified as an AgoKir; however, its long-term effects on KIR2.1 protein expression, subcellular localization, and function are unknown. Propafenone's long-term effect on KIR2.1 expression and its underlying mechanisms in vitro were investigated. KIR2.1-carried currents were measured by single-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology. KIR2.1 protein expression levels were determined by Western blot analysis, whereas conventional immunofluorescence and advanced live-imaging microscopy were used to assess the subcellular localization of KIR2.1 proteins. Acute propafenone treatment at low concentrations supports the ability of propafenone to function as an AgoKir without disturbing KIR2.1 protein handling. Chronic propafenone treatment (at 25-100 times higher concentrations than in the acute treatment) increases KIR2.1 protein expression and KIR2.1 current densities in vitro, which are potentially associated with pre-lysosomal trafficking inhibition.

Medical therapy with flecainide and propafenone in atrial fibrillation: Long-term clinical experience in the tertiary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Flecainide and propafenone are Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs that block the cardiac fast inwards Na+ current and are used for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on long-term clinical efficacy and safety of these drugs in a real-world setting are scarce. METHODS: Patients with AF who received chronic flecainide or propafenone therapy were retrospectively studied from the database of a tertiary care center. The primary outcome of the study was clinical efficacy of Class Ic antiarrhythmics, which was assessed based on the improvement of arrhythmia-related symptoms at the time of last follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 361 patients (261 males, 72.3%) with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years, 287 (79.5%) were using long-term flecainide, and 74 (20.5%) patients propafenone. The majority of the patients had paroxysmal AF (n = 331, 91.7%) and had an atrioventricular-nodal blocking co-medication (n = 287, 79.5%). A total of 117 (32%) patients discontinued therapy after a median of 210 days (interquartile range 62-855 days). Clinical efficacy was observed in 188 (52%) patients. The most common reason for therapy discontinuation was adverse drug effects, particularly proarrhythmic effects (48% for flecainide and 33% for propafenone). Patients who did not clinically benefit from Class Ic antiarrhythmics more often underwent pulmonary vein isolation (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term therapy with Class Ic antiarrhythmics showed clinical efficacy in approximately half of the patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. However, these drugs were also associated with a relatively high rate of adverse events, and in particular proarrhythmic effects, which often resulted in therapy discontinuation rendering appropriate patient selection and therapy surveillance essential.