Magnitud, composición y efecto económico en los hogares del gasto de bolsillo de las personas ingresadas al hospital respiratorio integrado de Encarnación en un semestre durante la pandemia por COVID-19 / Magnitude, composition, and economic effect on households of the out-of-pocket expenditure of people admitted to the Encarnacion integrated respiratory hospital in one semester during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción: Ante el COVID-19 se reorganizaron hospitales en el sistema de salud de Paraguay donde el financiamiento predominante es el gasto de bolsillo. Objetivos: Analizar el gasto de bolsillo en el hospital respiratorio integrado de Encarnación. Materiales y métodos: Estudio cuantitativo, observacional, descriptivo entre agosto 2020 y febrero 2021. Incluyó una muestra no aleatoria de 95 casos. Se aplicó una encuesta telefónica a un informante clave. Las variables dependientes fueron: gasto de bolsillo, razón gasto/ingreso y razón gasto/días de internación. Las independientes fueron: sexo, adulto mayor, ingreso a UTI, seguro médico y diagnóstico de COVID-19. El gasto excesivo se definió como mayor a 0,1 del ingreso y el catastrófico como mayor a 0,25 del ingreso. La asociación significativa se determinó mediante pruebas de Chi2 y Mann-Whitney (p<0,05). Resultados: El 97,8% tuvo gasto de bolsillo principalmente por medicamentos y descartables. El gasto total promedio fue 1,98 millones Gs, el gasto diario promedio 215,4 mil Gs y la razón gasto/ingreso 1,13. En cuidados intensivos el gasto total promedio fue 7,18 millones Gs (el máximo fue 18,41 millones Gs), el gasto diario promedio 666,8 mil Gs (el máximo fue 2,85 millones Gs diarios) y la razón gasto/ingreso 3,83. El gasto fue excesivo en el 87% de los casos y catastrófico en el 52% de los casos. El gasto se asoció significativamente con la edad mayor a 60 años, el haber ingresado a UTI y el diagnóstico de COVID-19, no así con el sexo ni con la tenencia de seguro. Conclusión: Los mecanismos de protección financiera fueron insuficientes para evitar gastos excesivos y catastróficos durante la hospitalización.

Introduction: Faced with COVID-19, hospitals were reorganized in the Paraguayan health system where the predominant financing is out-of-pocket expenses. Objectives: To analyze the out-of-pocket expenditure in the Encarnacion integrated respiratory hospital. Materials and methods: Quantitative, observational, descriptive study between August 2020 and February 2021. It included a non-random sample of 95 cases. A telephone survey was applied to a key informant. The dependent variables were: out-of-pocket expense, expense / income ratio, and expense / hospital days ratio. The independent ones were: sex, elderly, admission to ICU, medical insurance and diagnosis of COVID-19. Excessive spending was defined as greater than 0.1 of income and catastrophic as greater than 0.25 of income. The significant association was determined by Chi2 and Mann-Whitney tests (p <0.05). Results: 97.8% had out-of-pocket expenses mainly for medications and disposables. The average total expense was Gs 1.98 million, the average daily expense was Gs 215.4 thousand and the expense / income ratio was 1.13. In intensive care, the average total expenditure was 7.18 million Gs (the maximum was 18.41 million Gs), the average daily expenditure was 666.8 thousand Gs (the maximum was 2.85 million Gs per day) and the expense / income ratio 3.83. The expense was excessive in 87% of the cases and catastrophic in 52% of the cases. The expense was significantly associated with age over 60 years, having been admitted to the ICU and the diagnosis of COVID-19, not with sex or with insurance. Conclusion: The financial protection mechanisms were insufficient to avoid excessive and catastrophic expenses during hospitalization.

Gastos empobrecedores de salud: un desafío para la cobertura universal de salud en el Paraguay / Impoverishing health expenditure: a challenge for universal health coverage in Paraguay

El gasto de bolsillo es la principal fuente de financiamiento del sistema de salud en Paraguay. Es necesario revertir esta situación para que la Cobertura Universal de Salud sea efectiva en 2030, un logro que forma parte de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la incidencia del Gasto Empobrecedor en Salud en los hogares paraguayos. Tomó en cuenta aquellos hogares cuyos gastos de bolsillo causaron una caída por debajo de la línea de pobreza, así como los hogares que profundizaron su pobreza a causa de estos gastos de salud. Como material y método, el estudio analizó la Encuesta Permanente de Hogares 2014; tomó la definición de los gastos de bolsillo de la Organización Mundial de la Salud y la definición oficial de pobreza monetaria del país de la Dirección General de Estadísticas, Encuestas y Censos de la STP. El resultado es que 23,387 hogares fueron empujados por debajo de la línea de pobreza debido a gastos de bolsillo en caso de enfermedad. Esto representó el 1,8% de los hogares no pobres y el 1,4% del total de hogares. Además, el 61.9% de los hogares que ya se encontraban en situación de pobreza la empeoraron debido a los gastos de bolsillo en salud. La conclusión es que los hogares paraguayos están expuestos a gastos de salud excesivos y que se requieren políticas específicas para protegerlos. Las estrategias para combatir la pobreza pueden ser más efectivas cuando se consideran los gastos de salud en caso de una enfermedad o accidente.

Out-of-pocket spending is the main financing of the health system in Paraguay. Reversing this situation is necessary for the Universal Health Coverage to be effective in 2030, an achievement that is part of the Sustainable Development Goals. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of Impoverishment health expenditure in Paraguayan households. I take into account those households whose out-of-pocket expenses caused a fall below the poverty line, as well as households that deepened their poverty as a cause of these health expenditures. As a material and method, the study analyzed the Permanent Household Survey 2014; took the definition of the outof- pocket expenses of the World Health Organization and the official definition of monetary poverty of the country of the General Directorate of Statistics, Surveys and Census of the STP. The result is that 23,387 households were pushed below the poverty line due to out-of-pocket expenses in case of illness. This represented 1.8% of non-poor households and 1.4% of total households. In addition, 61.9% of households already in poverty worsened their poverty due to out-of-pocket health expenditures. The conclusion is that Paraguayan households are exposed to excessive health expenditures and that specific policies are required to protect the population in the area. Strategies to combat poverty can be more effective when considering health expenditures in case of the event of an illness or accident.

Gasto catastrófico y cobertura universal de salud: Análisis en el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Paraguay / Catastrophic health expenditure and universal health coverage: Analysis in the National Health System of Paraguay

Introducción: La cobertura universal de salud es una meta de salud de los Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible de las NNUU para el 2030. Un componente de la cobertura en salud es la protección financiera para recibir atención médica ante una enfermedad. Y, un indicador de la protección financiera es la incidencia de Gastos Catastróficos por motivos de salud. Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es describir la evolución del Gasto Catastrófico de salud de los hogares paraguayos entre el 2000 y el 2015. Materiales y Métodos: El material utilizado fue la Encuesta Permanente de Hogares de la DGEEC. El Gasto Catastrófico fue definido como aquellos gastos de bolsillo ≥ al 30% de la capacidad de pago de los hogares. Resultados: Los resultados indican que, durante ese periodo, la proporción de hogares afectados por gastos catastróficos varió entre 2,8% y 4,33%, siendo la mediana 4,10%. Los más afectados fueron los hogares rurales y los pobres. La proporción de hogares afectados presentó una tendencia al descenso, sobre todo para hogares urbanos y no pobres. Conclusión: La conclusión es que los hogares paraguayos están expuestos a gastos catastróficos por motivos de salud. La ocurrencia es mayor según las referidas características socioeconómicas. El desempeño actual del sistema nacional de salud no será suficiente para alcanzar la cobertura universal con protección financiera para todos. Por tanto, es necesario implementar nuevas políticas para la población más expuesta.

Introduction: Universal health coverage is a health goal of the UN Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. One component of health coverage is the financial protection to receive medical care for a disease. And, an indicator of financial protection is the incidence of Catastrophic Expenditures for health reasons. The objective of this paper is to describe the evolution of the Catastrophic Health Expenditure of Paraguayan households between 2000 and 2015. Materials and Methods: The material used was the Permanent Household Survey of the DGEEC. Catastrophic Expenditure was defined as those out-of-pocket expenses ≥ 30% of the household's payment capacity. Results: The results indicate that during this period, the proportion of households affected by catastrophic expenses ranged between 2.8% and 4.33%, with the median being 4.10%. Rural households and the poor were the most affected. The proportion of affected households showed a downward trend, especially for urban and non-poor households. Conclusion: In conclusion, Paraguayan households are exposed to catastrophic expenses for health reasons. The occurrence is greater according to the referred socioeconomic characteristics. The current performance of the national health system will not be enough to achieve universal coverage with financial protection for all. Therefore, it is necessary to implement new policies for the most exposed population.

Assessing the economic burden of illness for tuberculosis patients in Benin: determinants and consequences of catastrophic health expenditures and inequities.

OBJECTIVES: To inform policy-making, we measured the risk, causes and consequences of catastrophic expenditures for tuberculosis and investigated potential inequities. METHODS: Between August 2008 and February 2009, a cross-sectional study was conducted among all (245) smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients of six health districts from southern Benin. A standardised survey questionnaire covered the period of time elapsing from onset of tuberculosis symptoms to completion of treatment. Total direct cost exceeding the conventional 10% threshold of annual income was defined as catastrophic and used as principal outcome in a multivariable logistic regression. A sensitivity analysis was performed while varying the thresholds. RESULTS: A pure gradient of direct costs of tuberculosis in relation to income was observed. Incidence (78.1%) and intensity (14.8%) of catastrophic expenditure were high; varying thresholds was insensitive to the intensity. Incurring catastrophic expenditure was independently associated with lower- and middle-income quintiles (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) = 36.2, 95% CI [12.3-106.3] and aOR = 6.4 [2.8-14.6]), adverse pre-diagnosis stage (aOR = 5.4 [2.2-13.3]) and less education (aOR = 4.1[1.9-8.7]). Households incurred important days lost due to TB, indebtedness (37.1%), dissaving (51.0%) and other coping strategies (52.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Catastrophic direct costs and substantial indirect and coping costs may persist under the 'free' tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment strategy, as well as inequities in financial hardship.