Consensus guidelines for the management of vestibular schwannoma for lowand middle-income countries.

Vestibular Schwannoma (VS), previously known as acoustic neuroma, constitutes the majority of tumours found in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Most guidelines for managing CPA tumours have been developed by high-income countries (HICs). However, these guidelines often fall short in addressing the unique challenges encountered in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as Pakistan. In LMICs, issues related to a limited healthcare workforce, inadequate infrastructure, and constrained financial resources hinder the effective implementation of these HIC-derived guidelines. Additionally, it has been observed that VS tends to present at a larger size in LMICs compared to HICs. Given that VS is the predominant type of CPA tumour and other types are covered under separate guidelines, this article aims to provide practical, contextspecific recommendations for the screening, diagnosis, and management of Vestibular Schwannoma in LMIC settings. Our focus is to bridge the gap in care strategies and adapt them to the resource constraints and clinical realities of LMICs.

Judicious and evidence-based use of radiosurgery - recommendations for low-middle income countries.

Surgical removal remains the primary treatment for most brain tumours. However, radiosurgery presents an effective, less invasive alternative or additional treatment for certain types. Our goal was to explore radiosurgery's roles in treating various brain tumours, focussing on its application in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We reviewed all relevant systematic reviews, metaanalyses, and guidelines to determine the most effective radiosurgical approaches. Additionally, we consulted a panel of experts with over ten years of experience in LMICs, such as Pakistan. For brain tumours, stereotactic radiosurgery should generally follow a confirmed histopathological diagnosis. Exceptions include tumours identified through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), like Vestibular Schwannoma (VS), pre-diagnosed Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), multiple typical meningiomas, and metastases with a known histology from another site. While radiosurgery is gaining traction as a primary and adjunct treatment in some LMICs, the lack of regional guidelines, trained personnel, and collaboration among specialists hinders its wider adoption. Addressing these gaps is crucial for expanding radiosurgical care in these regions.

Association of the combined stereotactic radiosurgery and embolization strategy and long-term outcomes in brain arteriovenous malformations with a volume >10 ml: A nationwide multicenter observational prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the long-term outcome of large brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (volume > 10 ml) underwent combined embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (E+SRS) versus SRS alone. METHODS: Patients were recruited from a nationwide multicenter prospective collaboration registry (MATCH study, August 2011-August 2021) and categorized into E+SRS and SRS alone cohorts. Propensity score-matched survival analysis was employed to control for potential confounding variables. The primary outcome was a composite event of non-fatal hemorrhagic stroke or death. Secondary outcomes were favorable patient outcomes, AVM obliteration, favorable neurological outcomes, seizure, worsened mRS score, radiation-induced changes (RIC), and embolization complications. Furthermore, the efficacy of distinct embolization strategies was evaluated. Hazard ratios (HRs) were computed utilizing Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Among 1063 AVMs who underwent SRS with or without prior embolization, 176 patients met the enrollment criteria. Following propensity score matching, the final analysis encompassed 98 patients (49 pairs). Median (interquartile range) follow-up duration for primary outcomes spanned 5.4 (2.7-8.4) years. Overall, the E+SRS strategy demonstrated a trend toward reduced incidence of primary outcomes compared to the SRS alone strategy (1.44 vs 2.37 per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.58 [95 % CI, 0.17-1.93]). Regardless of embolization degree or strategy, stratified analyses further consistently revealed a similar trend, albeit without achieving statistical significance. Secondary outcomes generally exhibited equivalence, but the combined approach showed potential superiority in most measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a trend toward lower long-term non-fatal hemorrhagic stroke or death risks with the E+SRS strategy when compared to SRS alone in large AVMs (volume > 10 ml).

Patient reported outcomes and short-term adjustment trajectories following gamma knife radiosurgery for benign brain tumor.

PURPOSE: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in the context of Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSRS) for benign brain tumor have been under-researched. This study examined changes in PROs and adjustment trajectories post-GKSRS. METHOD: 50 adults (54% female) aged on average 53.18 (SD = 14.76) years with benign brain tumor were assessed 1 week before GKSRS, 1-2 weeks post-GKSRS, and at 3-month follow-up. Telephone-based questionnaires of anxiety and depressive symptoms, cognitive function, symptom burden, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were completed. RESULTS: Significant improvements in HRQoL, perceived cognitive ability, anxiety, and total brain tumor symptoms were evident between pre-GKSRS and 3-month follow-up. Conversely, there was a significant short-term increase in depressive symptoms at post-GKSRS; however, levels did not differ from pre-GKSRS at follow-up. No significant changes were evident on PROs of headaches or fatigue. About half of the participants (46-51%) experienced reliable improvement in global HRQoL, and one-third (31-34%) reported improved anxiety symptoms. Increased depressive symptoms was seen in 34% of participants post-GKSRS and 18% at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 months post-GKSRS, improvements in HRQoL, anxiety, perceived cognitive ability, and total brain tumor symptoms were evident. Routine monitoring and support for pre-GKSRS anxiety and depressive symptoms post-GKSRS is recommended.

Individuals receiving Gamma Knife radiosurgery for benign brain tumor experience positive impacts on global, emotional, and physical HRQoL, perceived cognitive ability, anxiety, and overall brain tumor symptoms following treatment.Due to heightened levels of anxiety observed prior to treatment, routine screening and support for anxiety are recommended before individuals receive Gamma Knife radiosurgery.Symptoms of depression may increase following Gamma Knife radiosurgery, therefore routine monitoring and management of mood symptoms is recommended after treatment.Evidence-based psychological interventions are needed for healthcare professionals to support individuals undergoing Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Treatment Reproducibility in Brain Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using a Shim Mask Versus a Standard Mask.

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the setup accuracy of the new shim mask with mouth bite compared to the standard full brain mask in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT) treatments for brain metastases or tumors. Method A combined retrospective and prospective design was employed, involving 40 patients treated at our center. Patients previously treated using standard head masks formed the retrospective cohort, while those treated with the Shim mask and mouth bite formed the prospective cohort. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained before each treatment session to ensure patient setup accuracy. Key metrics included absolute shifts in translational and rotational directions, the number of repeat CBCTs, and the time interval between CBCTs. Results The Shim mask significantly reduced the mean setup errors in the lateral translation (p=0.022) from 0.17 cm (SD=0.10) to 0.10 cm (SD=0.10), and in X-axis rotation (p=0.030) from 0.79° (SD=0.43) to 0.47° (SD=0.47). By considering cutoff points of 1 mm in translational and 1° in rotational directions, the Shim mask was significantly more accurate in the lateral direction (p=0.004). Moreover, while 70% of patients in the standard group required repeat CBCT scans, none in the Shim group did, resulting in an average time saving of 10.4 minutes per patient. Conclusion The Shim mask with mouth bite offers enhanced immobilization accuracy in SRT/SRS treatments, leading to time and potential cost savings by reducing the need for repeat CBCT scans. This underscores the importance of adopting innovative immobilization techniques to optimize patient outcomes.

A single-session stereotactic radiosurgery for vagal paraganglioma: Effective tumor reduction and innovative treatment option.

Background: Vagal paragangliomas (VPs) are rare tumors in the upper cervical region. Although surgical resection is the standard treatment for these tumors, it carries significant risks due to the tumor's high vascularity and proximity to vital structures. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for skull base paraganglioma could be a minimally invasive alternative. Case Description: We report the case of a 47-year-old man with a large, asymptomatic VP who was successfully treated with SRS with Gamma Knife Icon, which was performed in the parapharyngeal space (volume: 25.7 mL) using a marginal dose of 14 Gy to the 45% isodose line. This case illustrates the successful treatment of a lesion near the conventional limits (lower limit of C2 vertebral body) using noninvasive mask fixation. Excellent tumor control without neurological deficits was achieved for 25 months after SRS. The tumor volume decreased by 70% (final volume: 7.6 mL). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the utility of Gamma Knife Icon, which facilitates optimal SRS for upper cervical lesions, including VPs.

Mitigating radiation-induced cognitive toxicity in brain metastases: More questions than answers.

The emergence of advanced systemic therapies added to the use of cranial radiation techniques has significantly improved outcomes for cancer patients with multiple brain metastases (BM), leading to a considerable increase in long-term survivors. In this context, the rise of radiation-induced cognitive toxicity (RICT) has become increasingly relevant. In this critical narrative review, we address the controversies arising from clinical trials aimed at mitigating RICT. We thoroughly examine interventions such as memantine, hippocampal avoidance irradiation during BM treatment or in a prophylactic setting, and the assessment of cognitive safety in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Our focus extends to recent neuroscience research findings, emphasizing the importance of preserving not only the hippocampal cortex but also other cortical regions involved in neural dynamic networks and their intricate role in encoding new memories. Despite treatment advancements, effectively managing patients with multiple BM and determining the optimal timing and integration of radiation and systemic treatments remain areas requiring further elucidation. Future trials are required to delineate optimal indications and ensure SRS safety. Additionally, the impact of new systemic therapies and the potential effects of delaying irradiation on cognitive functioning also need to be addressed. Inclusive trial designs, encompassing patients with multiple BM and accounting for diverse treatment scenarios, are essential for advancing effective strategies in managing RICT and the treatment of BM patients.

The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2024.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common solid tumour of the kidney and accounts for 3% of all cancers. While immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies have emerged as the first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the role of surgery has become more controversial. This review summarizes the evidence, current role and future directions for surgery in mRCC management. The survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) shown in the interferon era have encountered increasing disputes in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) and ICI eras. Undoubtedly, several systematic reviews based on retrospective data have supported the survival benefits of CN. Nevertheless, 2 prospective trials, CARMENA and SURTIME, proved that sunitinib as the upfront therapy resulted in noninferior survival outcomes compared with immediate CN. The safety of CN does have solid ground in the current literature. Several studies suggested that preoperative systemic therapy did not seem to aggravate perioperative complications or mortality rates, in experienced centres. Meticulous patient selection is the rule of thumb in the modern management of mRCC patients. The limitations of the existing prognostication models, however, must be acknowledged. Clinicians should adopt a multidisciplinary and holistic approach and contemplate all patient, disease, surgeon and socio-economical factors, before deciding who should go for surgery. The advent of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and survival benefits of adjuvant pembrolizumab shown in the oligometastatic subgroup, where complete metastasectomy could be achieved (M1 NED), calls for more comparative studies against upfront ICI combinations. In summary, CN brings survival benefits to well-selected good-to-intermediate-risk mRCC patients. Individualized and multidisciplinary care is pivotal.

KEAP1-mutant atypical meningioma: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: While genetic testing of tumors is commonly used to inform the selection of systemic therapies, there is limited evidence for the application of radiotherapy for brain cancer. Recent studies have shown that Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), a key regulator of cellular responses to oxidative and electrophilic stress, is associated with radioresistance in multiple cancer types. Several studies have reported the clinical significance of KEAP1 mutation in brain metastasis; however, the effect of KEAP1 mutations on radioresponse in meningioma has never been reported. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present the case of a 40-year-old female with a KEAP1 mutation-positive atypical meningioma that was initially treated with resection followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Recurrence was observed at 15 months, requiring reoperation and adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). An excellent treatment response was observed at 7 months post-SRS with an improvement in reported symptoms, although bevacizumab was required for the resolution of radiation necrosis observed 2 months post-SRS. LESSONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of KEAP1-mutant meningioma, including its clinical course after comprehensive management. Notably, treatment included multimodal radiotherapy with IMRT followed by SRS. SRS led to an excellent treatment response at the 7-month follow-up. However, radiation necrosis developed after both radiotherapy treatments, suggesting that radiological modification can be beneficial in patients with KEAP1 mutations. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24387.

Hearing preservation and quality of life in small to medium sized vestibular schwannomas after a wait and scan approach or stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) encompasses a choice between conservative "wait-and-scan" (WAS) approach, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or open microsurgical resection. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management approach for small to medium sized VS. This study aims to compared outcomes related to hearing in patients with small and medium sized VS who underwent initial treatment with WAS versus SRS. METHODS: A systematic review of the available literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane up December 08, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model to calculate mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR). A leave-one-out analysis was conducted. The risk of bias was assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool (RoB-2). Ultimately, the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE assessment. The primary outcomes were serviceable hearing, and pure-tone average (PTA). The secondary outcome was the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life Scale (PANQOL) total score. RESULTS: Nine studies were eligible for inclusion, comprising a total of 1,275 patients. Among these, 674 (52.86%) underwent WAS, while 601 patients (47.14%) received SRS. Follow-up duration ranged from two to eight years. The meta-analysis indicated that WAS had a better outcome for serviceable hearing (0.47; 95% CI: 0.32 - 0.68; p < 0.001), as well as for postoperative functional measures including PTA score (MD 13.48; 95% CI 3.83 - 23.13; p < 0.01), and PANQOL total score (MD 3.83; 95% CI 0.42 - 7.25; p = 0.03). The overall certainty of evidence ranged from "very low" to "moderate". CONCLUSIONS: Treating small to medium sized VS with WAS increases the likelihood of preserving serviceable hearing and optimized PANQOL overall postoperative score compared to SRS. Nevertheless, the limited availability of literature and the methodological weakness observed in existing studies outline the need for higher-quality studies.

Predictive value of perilesional edema volume in melanoma brain metastasis response to stereotactic radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an established treatment for melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Recent evidence suggests that perilesional edema volume (PEV) might compromise the delivery and efficacy of radiotherapy to treat BM. This study investigated the association between SRT efficacy and PEV extent in MBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed medical records from January 2020 to September 2023. Patients with up to 5 measurable MBMs, intracranial disease per RANO/iRANO criteria, and on low-dose corticosteroids were included. MRI scans assessed baseline neuroimaging, with PEV analyzed using 3D Slicer. SRT plans were based on MRI-CT fusion, delivering 18-32.5 Gy in 1-5 fractions. Outcomes included intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and survival measures (L-iPFS and OS). Statistical analysis involved decision tree analysis and multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for clinical and treatment variables. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with 101 MBM were analyzed, with a mean age of 68.83 years. The iORR was 61.4%, with Complete Response (CR) in 21.8% and Partial Response (PR) in 39.6% of the treated lesions. PEV correlated with KPS, BRAF status, and treatment response. Decision tree analysis identified a PEV cutoff at 0.5 cc, with lower PEVs predicting better responses (AUC = 0.82 sensitivity: 86.7%, specificity:74.4%,). Patients with PEV ≥ 0.5 cc had lower response rates (iORR 44.7% vs. 63.8%, p < 0.001). Median OS was 9.4 months, with L-iPFS of 27 months. PEV significantly impacted survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A more extensive PEV was associated with a less favorable outcome to SRT in MBM.

Vein of galen malformations: for patients and caregivers.

Vein of Galen malformations (VOGMs), also known as Vein of Galen Aneurysmal Malformations (VGAMs), are rare and complex cerebrovascular anomalies that pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. These malformations result from abnormal arteriovenous shunts during embryonic development, leading to a range of severe clinical manifestations, including high-output cardiac failure and hydrocephalus. Advances in prenatal imaging, particularly fetal MRI, have improved early detection, allowing for timely intervention. Endovascular techniques, especially transarterial embolization, have become the primary treatment modality, often preferred over surgical approaches due to their effectiveness and lower risk. However, challenges remain, particularly in managing these malformations in neonates and infants, where the risk of complications is high. Gamma Knife radiosurgery offers a non-invasive alternative for select cases, though its effects are gradual and may carry delayed risks. Despite advancements, the management of VOGMs continues to require a multidisciplinary approach, with ongoing research focused on improving outcomes through a better understanding of the genetic and molecular underpinnings of the disease. Future directions include the integration of genetic studies into clinical practice and the refinement of treatment strategies to optimize outcomes for this complex condition.

Recovery of cranial nerve neuropathies after LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for benign cavernous sinus meningioma.

PURPOSE: Cranial Nerve Neuropathies (CNNs) often accompany Cavernous Sinus Meningioma (CSM), for which Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) are established treatments. This study assesses CNNs recovery in CSM patients treated with LINAC, offering insight into treatment effectiveness. METHODS: This study was conducted on 128 patients with CSM treated with LINAC-based SRS/FSR between 2005 and 2020 at a single institution. 46 patients presented with CNNs. The study analyzed patients' demographics, clinical parameters, SRS/FSR treatment characteristics, post-treatment CNNs recovery duration, status, and radiological control on their last follow-up. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 53.4 months. Patients were treated with SRS (n = 25) or FSR (n = 21). The mean pretreatment tumor volume was 9.5 cc decreasing to a mean end-of-follow-up tumor volume was 5.1 cc. Radiological tumor control was achieved in all cases. CNN recovery was observed in 80.4% of patients, with specific nerve recoveries documented as follows: extra-ocular nerves (43.2%), trigeminal nerve (32.4%), and optic nerve (10.8%). A higher CNNs recovery rate was associated with a smaller pre-treatment tumor volume (p < 0.001), and the median time-to-improvement was 3.7 months. Patients with tumor volumes exceeding 6.8 cc and those treated with FSR exhibited prolonged time-to-improvement (P < 0.03 and P < 0.04 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that SRS/FSR for CSM provides good and sustainable CNNs recovery outcomes with excellent long-term radiological control. A higher CNNs recovery rate was associated with a smaller pre-treatment tumor volume. while shorter time-to-improvement was identified in patients treated with SRS compared to FSR, particularly in those with small pre-treatment tumor volume.

Evaluation of the Minimum Segment Width and Fluence Smoothing Tools for Intensity-modulated Techniques in Monaco Treatment Planning System.

Purpose: This study aims to minimize monitor units (MUs) of intensity-modulated treatments in the Monaco treatment planning system while preserving plan quality by optimizing the "Minimum Segment Width" (MSW) and "Fluence Smoothing" parameters. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 prostate, 30 gynecological, 15 breast cancer, 10 head and neck tumor, 11 radiosurgery, and 10 hypo-fractionated plans. Original prostate plans employed "Fluence Smoothing" = Off and were reoptimized with Low, Medium, and High settings. The remaining pathologies initially used MSW = 0.5 cm and were reoptimized with MSW = 1.0 cm. Plan quality, including total MU, delivery time, and dosimetric constraints, was statistically analyzed with a paired t-test. Results: Prostate plans exhibited the highest MU variation when changing "Fluence Smoothing" from Off to High (average ΔMU = -5.1%; P < 0.001). However, a High setting may increase overall MU when MSW = 0.5 cm. Gynecological plans changed substantially when MSW increased from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm (average ΔMU = -29%; P < 0.001). Organs at risk sparing and planning target volumes remained within 1.2% differences. Replanning other pathologies with MSW = 1.0 cm affected breast and head and neck tumor plans (average ΔMU = -168.38, average Δt = -11.74 s, and average ΔMU = -256.56, average Δt = -15.05 s, respectively; all with P < 0.004). Radiosurgery and hypofractioned highly modulated plans did not yield statistically significant results. Conclusions: In breast, pelvis, head and neck, and prostate plans, starting with MSW = 1.0 cm optimally reduces MU and treatment time without compromising plan quality. MSW has a greater impact on MU than the "Fluence Smoothing" parameter. Plans with high modulation might present divergent behavior, requiring a case-specific analysis with MSW values higher than 0.5 cm.

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) delivers a high dose of radiation to a specific brain area while limiting radiation to nearby healthy tissue. While most SRS has traditionally been performed with a stereotactic frame-based approach, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Our study followed the recommended guidelines summarized in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were searched from inception to 10 October 2023. The pooled rate of outcomes was calculated using random effect model and Restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA V.17. A total of 499 studies were recruited from the electronic databases. After removing duplicates (n = 117), 382 studies were used for title/abstract, and 329 were removed from the study selection process. A total of 53 articles were used for full-text assessment, and 35 studies were included for data extraction. Our analysis revealed a significant increase across all pooled survival rates and local control rates by initiating the radiosurgery for patients, estimating the pooled 6-month OSR of 75% (95% CI: 68-81%), 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) of 60% (95% CI: 51-69%), 18-month OSR of 48% (95% CI: 10-85%), 2-year OSR of 39% (95% CI: 19-58%), 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFSR) of 68% (95% CI: 39-98%), 2-year PFSR of 75% (95% CI: 58-91%), 6-month local control rate (LCR) of 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), and 12-month LCR of 86% (95% CI: 82-90%). Our meta-analysis findings confirm the efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in treating brain metastases. Using data from several trials, we were able to demonstrate stereotactic radiosurgery's effectiveness as a therapy option for brain metastasis patients, demonstrating local control and reasonable overall survival.

Clinical Outcomes and Targeted Genomic Analysis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Molecular profiles of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases (BMs) are not well characterized. Effective management with locoregional therapies, including stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is critical as systemic therapy advancements have improved overall survival (OS). OBJECTIVE: To identify clinicogenomic features of RCC BMs treated with SRS in a large patient cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-institution retrospective analysis was conducted of all RCC BM patients treated with SRS from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2021. INTERVENTION: SRS for RCC BMs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify gene alterations more prevalent in BM patients. Clinical factors and genes altered in ≥10% of samples were assessed per patient using Cox proportional hazards models and per individual BM using clustered competing risks regression with competing risk of death. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Ninety-one RCC BM patients underwent SRS to 212 BMs, with a median follow-up of 38.8 mo for patients who survived. The median intracranial progression-free survival and OS were 7.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.7-11) and 21 (IQR 16-32) mo, respectively. Durable local control of 83% was achieved at 12 mo after SRS, and 59% of lesions initially meeting the radiographic criteria for progression at 3-mo evaluation would be considered to represent pseudoprogression at 6-mo evaluation. A comparison of genomic alterations at both the gene and the pathway level for BM+ patients compared with BM- patients revealed phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway alterations to be more prevalent in BM+ patients (43% vs 16%, p = 0.001, q = 0.01), with the majority being PTEN alterations (17% vs 2.7%, p = 0.003, q = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest study investigating genomic profiles of RCC BMs and the only such study with annotated intracranial outcomes. SRS provides durable in-field local control of BMs. Recognizing post-SRS pseudoprogression is crucial to ensure appropriate management. The incidence of PI3K pathway alterations is more prevalent in BM+ patients than in BM- patients and warrants further investigation in a prospective setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: We examined the outcomes of radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases in kidney cancer patients at a single large referral center. We found that radiation provides good control of brain tumors, and certain genetic mutations may be found more commonly in patients with brain metastasis.

A retrospective cohort study of stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: Comparison of two age groups (75 years or older vs. 65-74 years).

Background: Treatment outcome data of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas (VS) in patients ≥75 years (late elderly) are lacking. Approximately 39% of patients ≥75 years with VS were reported to experience severe facial palsy after surgical removal. This study compared the treatment outcomes post-SRS for VS between patients ≥75 and 65-74 years (early elderly). Methods: Of 453 patients who underwent gamma knife SRS for VS, 156 were ≥65 years old. The late and early elderly groups comprised 35 and 121 patients, respectively. The median tumor volume was 4.4 cc, and the median radiation dose was 12.0 Gy. Results: The median follow-up periods were 37 and 56 months in the late and early elderly groups, respectively. Tumor volume control was observed in 27 (88%) and 95 (83%) patients (P = 0.78), while additional procedures were required in 2 (6%) and 6 (6%) patients (P = 1.00) in the late and early elderly groups, respectively. At the 60th and 120th months post-SRS, the cumulative tumor control rates were 87%, 75%, 85%, and 73% (P = 0.81), while the cumulative clinical control rates were 93% and 87%, 95%, and 89% (P = 0.80), in the late and early elderly groups, respectively. In the early elderly group, two patients experienced facial pain, and one experienced facial palsy post-SRS; there were no adverse effects in the late elderly group (both P = 1.00). Conclusion: SRS is effective for VS and beneficial in patients ≥75 years old as it preserves the facial nerve.

Orbital varices: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes - A scoping review.

Background: Orbital varices are vein dilations in the orbit presenting various symptoms. This scoping review synthesizes existing evidence on their epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment efficacy. Methods: Literature was reviewed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed and Scopus were searched until April 31, 2024, for articles on clinically diagnosed ocular varices detailing diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes. Exclusions were reviews, animal studies, and incomplete case reports. Data on study characteristics, diagnosis, management, and outcomes were extracted and assessed for quality and bias. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 4 to 30 and ages from 1 to 87 years. Diagnostic tools included magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, while treatments ranged from conservative methods to invasive procedures and radiosurgery. Notably, higher symptom resolution rates were associated with observational strategies and minimally invasive surgeries. However, Gamma Knife radiosurgery, although promising, posed risks of vision impairment in some cases. Conclusion: The management of orbital varices has evolved significantly with newer, less invasive techniques improving outcomes and reducing recovery times. Despite advancements, challenges such as disease recurrence and the need for personalized treatment regimens persist, underscoring the ongoing need for research to refine and standardize treatment approaches.

Hypopituitarism after gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: long-term results from a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of new-onset hypopituitarism after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for pituitary adenomas in a single center. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 241 pituitary adenoma patients who underwent GKRS from 1993 to 2016 were enrolled. These patients had complete endocrine, imaging, and clinical data before and after GKRS. The median follow-up time was 56.0 (range, 12.7-297.6) months. RESULTS: Fifty patients (20.7%) developed new-onset hypopituitarism after GKRS, including hypogonadism (n = 22), hypothyroidism (n = 29), hypocortisolism (n = 20), and growth hormone deficiency (n = 4). The median time to new-onset hypopituitarism was 44.1 (range, 13.5-141.4) months. The rates of new-onset hypopituitarism were 7%, 16%, 20%, 39%, and 45% at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. For those patients treated with a single GKRS, sex (p = 0.012), suprasellar extension (p = 0.048), tumor volume (≥ 5 cm3) (p < 0.001), tumor progression (p = 0.001), pre-existing hypopituitarism (p = 0.011), and previous surgery (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with new-onset hypopituitarism in univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, tumor volume (≥ 5 cm3) and tumor progression were associated with new-onset hypopituitarism (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.401, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.708-6.773, p < 0.001 and HR = 3.594, 95% CI = 1.032-12.516, p = 0.045, respectively). For patients who received 2 or more times GKRS, no risk factors associated with new-onset hypopituitarism were found. CONCLUSION: New-onset hypopituitarism was not uncommon after GKRS for pituitary adenomas. In this study, large tumor volume (≥ 5 cm3) and tumor progression were associated with new-onset hypopituitarism after a single GKRS.

Timing of stereotactic radiosurgery within the first-line systemic treatment in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a retrospective single-center cohort study.

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) and novel systemic treatments, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have demonstrated to be effective in managing brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal treatment sequence of SRS/SRT and TKI/ICI remains uncertain. This retrospective monocentric analysis addresses this question by comparing the outcomes of patients with NSCLC brain metastases who received upfront SRS/SRT versus those who were initially treated with TKI/ICI. Methods: All patients treated with SRS/SRT and TKI/ICI for NSCLC brain metastases were collected from a clinical database. The patients who received first-line TKI or ICI for the treatment of brain metastases were then selected for further analysis. Within this cohort, a comparative analysis between upfront SRS/SRT and patients initially treated with TKI/ICI was conducted, assessing key parameters such as overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and treatment-related toxicity. Both OS and iPFS were defined as the time from SRS/SRT to either death or disease progression, respectively. Results: The analysis encompassed 54 patients, of which 34 (63.0%) patients received SRS/SRT and TKI/ICI as their first-line therapy. Of the latter, 17 (50.0%) patients received upfront SRS/SRT and 17 (50.0%) were initially treated with TKI/ICI; 24 (70.6%) received SRS/SRT and ICI, and 10 (29.4%) received SRS/SRT and TKI. The cohorts did not significantly differ in the univariable analyses for the following parameters: sex, age, histology, molecular genetics, disease stage at study treatment, performance status, number of brain metastases, treatment technique, tumor volume, target volume, disease progression, radiation necrosis, dosimetry. While no significant differences were found in terms of iPFS and OS between patients treated with upfront SRS/SRT and patients initially treated with TKI, upfront SRS/SRT demonstrated significantly superior OS when compared to patients initially treated with ICI (median OS not reached vs. 17.5 months; mean 37.8 vs. 23.6 months; P=0.03) with no difference in iPFS. No significant differences in treatment-related toxicity were observed among the cohorts. Conclusions: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, patients treated with upfront SRS/SRT demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to patients initially treated with ICI in the cohort receiving first-line therapy for brain metastases. However, given the retrospective design and the limited cohort size, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from these findings. Nevertheless, the results suggest that the timing of SRS/SRT may play an important role in treatment outcomes. Further investigation, preferably through prospective randomized trials, is warranted to provide more conclusive answers to this important question.