Distal Radial Fractures with Scaphoid Fractures.

Objective This study evaluated the epidemiological data and functional outcomes from patients with concomitant distal radial and scaphoid fractures treated in a single center specialized in hand surgery. Functional outcomes analysis used validated instruments. Methods Patients diagnosed with distal radial and scaphoid fractures treated from January 2011 to December 2021 underwent assessments using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, goniometry, radiographic consolidation, and complications six months after surgery. Results The study included 23 patients, 73.9% men and 26.1% women. Most (56.5%) fractures occurred on the right side, and 43.5% happened on the left side. Treatment of most (56%) distal radial fractures used a locked volar plate. Functional assessment by PRWE resulted in a mean score of 35.9 points (range, 14 to 71 points), while DASH showed a mean score of 37.8 points (range, 12 to 78 points). The mean VAS was 2.33 during activities (range, 0.6 to 6.2). Conclusion Distal radial fractures associated with scaphoid fractures resulted from high-energy trauma, and most patients were males. There was a low rate of complications with surgical treatment, and the patients had satisfactory functional evolution with a low level of pain.

Comparison of Sociodemographic and Radiographic Features in Distal Radio Fracture Treatment: Hand Surgeons versus Non-specialists.

Objective: This study evaluated sociodemographic and radiographic features of patients with distal radial fractures treated at a trauma hospital in southern Brazil, comparing those treated by hand surgery specialists (group 1) and non-specialists (group 2). Methods: This study consists of a retrospective cohort of 200 patients treated in 2020. After reviewing medical records and radiographs, the following parameters were analyzed: age, gender, trauma mechanism, laterality, associated comorbidities and fractures, fracture classification (AO), radial height, radial inclination, and volar inclination. Comparison of the two groups used the Student t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher exact test. Results: Most subjects were women (54%), sustained low-energy traumas (58%), and were left-handed (53%). Group 1 had a lower mean age (50.2 years); most of their subjects sustained high-energy trauma (54%) and had type C fractures (73%); type A fractures prevailed in group 2 (72%). Radiographs showed a significant difference regarding the mean radial inclination (21.5° in group 1 and 16.5° in group 2 [ p < 0.001] in women, and 21.3° in group 1 and 17° in group 2 [ p < 0.001] in men) and volar inclination (10.1° and 12.8° in groups 1 and 2, respectively [ p < 0.001]). In addition, the absolute number of cases with reestablished anatomical parameters per the three evaluated variables was also significantly different; all parameters were better in group 1. Conclusion: Hand surgeons treated the most severe fractures and had the best radiographic outcomes.

Distal Radial Fractures with Scaphoid Fractures / Fraturas do rádio distal associadas à fratura do escafoide

Abstract Objective This study evaluated the epidemiological data and functional outcomes from patients with concomitant distal radial and scaphoid fractures treated in a single center specialized in hand surgery. Functional outcomes analysis used validated instruments. Methods Patients diagnosed with distal radial and scaphoid fractures treated from January 2011 to December 2021 underwent assessments using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, goniometry, radiographic consolidation, and complications six months after surgery. Results The study included 23 patients, 73.9% men and 26.1% women. Most (56.5%) fractures occurred on the right side, and 43.5% happened on the left side. Treatment of most (56%) distal radial fractures used a locked volar plate. Functional assessment by PRWE resulted in a mean score of 35.9 points (range, 14 to 71 points), while DASH showed a mean score of 37.8 points (range, 12 to 78 points). The mean VAS was 2.33 during activities (range, 0.6 to 6.2). Conclusion Distal radial fractures associated with scaphoid fractures resulted from high-energy trauma, and most patients were males. There was a low rate of complications with surgical treatment, and the patients had satisfactory functional evolution with a low level of pain.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar os resultados epidemiológicos e funcionais dos pacientes que apresentaram fraturas concomitantes do rádio distal e do escafoide e foram tratados em um único centro especializado em cirurgia da mão, através de instrumentos validados para analisar os desfechos funcionais desses pacientes. Métodos Foram avaliados os pacientes com diagnóstico de fratura do rádio distal e escafoide tratados de janeiro de 2011 até dezembro de 2021, através dos questionários Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) e Escala Visual Analógica da dor (EVA); goniometria; consolidação radiográfica; complicações em seis meses de pós-operatório. Resultados Vinte e três pacientes foram incluídos no estudo, sendo 73,9% homens e 26,1% mulheres; 56,5% das fraturas ocorreram à direita e 43,5% à esquerda. A maioria das fraturas do rádio distal foi tratada com placa volar bloqueada, totalizando 56%. Na avaliação funcional pelo PRWE, obteve-se média de 35,9 pontos (variação de 14 a 71 pontos) e pelo DASH média de 37,8 pontos (variação de 12 a 78 pontos). A EVA apresentou uma média de 2,33 durante a atividade (variação de 0,6 a 6,2). Conclusão Verificou-se que as fraturas do rádio distal associadas a fraturas do escafoide foram causadas por traumas de alta energia, com o sexo masculino mais acometido. Houve baixo índice de complicações com tratamento cirúrgico e os pacientes tiveram evolução funcional satisfatória, com baixo índice de dor.

Comparison of Sociodemographic and Radiographic Features in Distal Radio Fracture Treatment: Hand Surgeons versus Non-specialists / Comparação de características sociodemográficas e radiográficas no tratamento de fratura de rádio distal: Cirurgiões de mão versus não especialistas

Abstract Objective: This study evaluated sociodemographic and radiographic features of patients with distal radial fractures treated at a trauma hospital in southern Brazil, comparing those treated by hand surgery specialists (group 1) and non-specialists (group 2). Methods: This study consists of a retrospective cohort of 200 patients treated in 2020. After reviewing medical records and radiographs, the following parameters were analyzed: age, gender, trauma mechanism, laterality, associated comorbidities and fractures, fracture classification (AO), radial height, radial inclination, and volar inclination. Comparison of the two groups used the Student t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher exact test. Results: Most subjects were women (54%), sustained low-energy traumas (58%), and were left-handed (53%). Group 1 had a lower mean age (50.2 years); most of their subjects sustained high-energy trauma (54%) and had type C fractures (73%); type A fractures prevailed in group 2 (72%). Radiographs showed a significant difference regarding the mean radial inclination (21.5° in group 1 and 16.5° in group 2 [p < 0.001] in women, and 21.3° in group 1 and 17° in group 2 [p < 0.001] in men) and volar inclination (10.1° and 12.8° in groups 1 and 2, respectively [p < 0.001]). In addition, the absolute number of cases with reestablished anatomical parameters per the three evaluated variables was also significantly different; all parameters were better in group 1. Conclusion: Hand surgeons treated the most severe fractures and had the best radiographic outcomes.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar as características sociodemográficas e radiográficas dos pacientes com fratura de rádio distal tratados em um hospital de trauma no sul do Brasil, comparando os casos tratados pelos especialistas em cirurgia da mão (grupo 1) com aqueles tratados por não especialistas (grupo 2). Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva realizada com 200 pacientes, no ano de 2020. Por meio da revisão de prontuários e radiografias, analisaram-se: idade, sexo, mecanismo de trauma, lateralidade, presença de comorbidades e fraturas associadas, classificação da fratura (AO), altura radial, inclinação radial e, inclinação volar. Comparou-se os dois grupos por meio do teste t de Student, qui-quadrado ou exato de Fisher. Resultados: A maioria era de pacientes do sexo feminino (54%), traumas de baixa energia (58%) e lateralidade esquerda (53%). O grupo 1 apresentou média de idade menor (50,2 anos), traumas de alta energia (54%), e fraturas tipo C (73%), enquanto no grupo 2 fraturas tipo A prevaleceram (72%). As radiografias apresentaram diferença significativa quanto à média de valores de inclinação radial (21,5° no grupo 1 e 16,5° no grupo 2 [p < 0,001] nas mulheres e, 21,3° no grupo 1 e 17° no grupo 2 [p < 0,001] nos homens) e inclinação volar (10,1° e 12,8° no grupo 1 e 2, respectivamente [p < 0,001]), bem como no número absoluto de casos que reestabeleceram os parâmetros anatômicos nas três variáveis avaliadas, sendo todos melhores no grupo 1. Conclusão: Os cirurgiões de mão trataram as fraturas mais graves e apresentaram os melhores resultados radiográficos.

Estudio de concordancia de radiografía-tomografía computarizada de las fracturas de radio distal / Radiography-computed tomography concordance study of distal radius fractures

Introducción: La fractura de radio distal resulta común en la extremidad superior y representa un reto terapéutico. Objetivo: Determinar la concordancia entre radiografía simple y tomografía computarizada con respecto a las clasificaciones AO Foundation y de Fernández, y la elección del tratamiento. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de concordancia diagnóstica entre radiografía simple y tomografía computarizada. Ortopedistas y cirujanos de mano analizaron 19 imágenes de fracturas de radio distal de acuerdo con las clasificaciones AO Foundation y de Fernández, y las distintas opciones de tratamiento. Para el grado de concordancia se usó el coeficiente Kappa de Fleiss. La prueba de t-Student y Chi cuadrado diferenciaron los grupos para variables cuantitativas y cualitativas, respectivamente. Hubo una significancia estadística de p= 0,05. Resultados: La clasificación de Fernández coincidió mejor que la clasificación AO Foundation entre radiografía y tomografía computarizada. En la elección del tratamiento y la técnica de osteosíntesis la concordancia fue mayor al 90 por ciento, mientras que el abordaje quirúrgico solo alcanzó el 50 por ciento. La clasificación AO Foundation radiográfica se correspondió con fracturas complejas, mientras la de Fernández con las menos complicadas. Las fracturas se subestimaron cuando se clasificaron con radiografía. Conclusiones: La relación de las clasificaciones entre radiografía y tomografía computarizada para fracturas de radio distal no resulta satisfactoria. La tomografía computarizada ofrece información que modifica las decisiones en el tratamiento(AU)

Introduction: Distal radius fracture is common in the upper extremity and represents a therapeutic challenge. Objective: To determine the agreement between simple radiography and computed tomography with respect to AO Foundation and Fernández classifications, and the choice of treatment. Methods: A diagnostic agreement study was carried out between simple radiography and computed tomography. Orthopedists and hand surgeons analyzed 19 images of distal radius fractures according to AO Foundation and Fernández classifications, and the different treatment options. Fleiss Kappa coefficient was used for the degree of agreement. The Student's t-test and chi-square differentiated the groups for quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively. There was a statistical significance of p = 0.05. Results: Fernández classification coincided better than AO Foundation between radiography and computed tomography. In the choice of treatment and osteosynthesis technique, agreement was greater than 90 percent, while the surgical approach only reached 50 percent. The radiographic AO Foundation classification corresponded to complex fractures while Fernández classification corresponded to less complicated ones. Fractures were underestimated when classified with radiography. Conclusions: The relationship of classifications between radiography and computed tomography for distal radius fractures is not satisfactory. Computed tomography provides information that modifies treatment decisions(AU)

Radial Nerve Supracondylar Block Versus Fracture Hematoma Block. Comparison of Their Efficacy in Cases of Fractures of the Distal Third of the Radius.

Objective The present study compares the analgesic efficacy of two techniques to perform non-surgical reduction: fracture hematoma block and radial nerve supracondylar block. Methods Forty patients with fractures of the distal third of the radius, who required reduction, were selected in a quasi-randomized clinical trial to receive one of the anesthetic techniques. All patients signed the informed consent form, except for those who did not wish to participate in the study, had neurological injury, had contraindication to the procedure in the emergency room, or with contraindication to the use of lidocaine. To measure analgesia, the numerical pain rate scale was used at four different moments: preblock, postblock, during reduction, and after reduction; then three differences were calculated: the first between before and after blocking; the second between during reduction and after blockade; and the third between before blocking and after reduction. Results The fracture hematoma and supracondylar block groups showed the following mean values, respectively: 3.90 (1-10) and 3.50 (-6-10) in difference 1; 4.35 (-5-10) and 5.00 (-3-10) in difference 2; and 4.65 (1-10) and 3.80 (-3-10) in difference 3. Conclusion Both techniques proved to be efficient for analgesia, with mild superiority of hematoma block, but without statistical significance.

EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES IN INTERVENTION RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS - DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES.

Objectives: Describe the frequency and types of outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCT) of intervention for distal radius fractures, analyze how confusing outcome presentations can lead to misinterpretations, and suggest strategies to improve the reader's understanding of the decision-making process. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted through a systematized search on the PubMed® database in the last 10 years, in which only intervention RCT was included for distal radius fractures, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Of the primary outcomes analyzed in the 75 selected articles, 46.6% were classified as clinical outcomes, 20% as surrogate, 30.6% as composite, 1.3% as complex scales, and 1.3% as safety outcomes. 34.7% of the articles did not report adverse events. Conclusion: The presentation of outcomes with little clinical relevance represented more than half of the sample (53.4%) - such studies can harm the reader since they confuse the interpretation of scientific evidence; the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative could help health professionals in understanding and selecting the most appropriate therapeutic interventions for patients. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective comparative study .

Objetivos: Descrever a frequência e os tipos de desfechos em ensaios clínicos randomizados (RCT) de intervenção para fraturas distais do rádio, analisar como apresentações confusas de desfechos podem levar a interpretações equivocadas e sugerir estratégias para melhorar a compreensão do leitor sobre o processo de tomada de decisão. Métodos: Foi realizado estudo retrospectivo mediante busca sistematizada na base de dados PubMed® nos últimos 10 anos, na qual foram incluídos apenas RCT de intervenção para fraturas do segmento distal do rádio, cujos desfechos foram analisados. Resultados: Dos desfechos primários analisados nos 75 artigos selecionados, 46,6% foram classificados como desfechos clínicos, 20% como substitutos, 30,6% como compostos, 1,3% como escalas complexas e em 1,3% como desfechos de segurança. 34,7% dos artigos não reportaram eventos adversos. Conclusão: A apresentação de desfechos com pouca relevância clínica representou mais da metade da amostra (53,4%) - tais estudos podem prejudicar o leitor, uma vez que confundem a interpretação das evidências científicas; a iniciativa Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) auxilia os profissionais de saúde na compreensão e seleção das intervenções terapêuticas mais adequadas para os pacientes. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo retrospectivo comparativo .

Reparación del músculo pronador cuadrado en fracturas de radio distal tratadas con fijación interna por abordaje palmar: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis / Repair of the pronator quadratus muscle in distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation through a palmar approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introducción: el músculo pronador cuadrado funciona como un estabilizador dinámico de la articulación radiocubital distal. Su reparación posterior a la fijación interna con placa de bloqueo volar en fracturas distales del radio es controvertida. Objetivo: determinar si la reparación del músculo pronador cuadrado influye en los resultados clínicos y funcionales de pacientes con fractura de radio distal que se sometieron a reducción abierta y fijación interna con placa de bloqueo volar. Materiales y métodos: se realizó una revisión sistemática y metanálisis. Las bases de datos analizadas fueron PubMed/Medline, Embase y Bireme/Lilacs (búsqueda realizada hasta el 20 de febrero del año 2023). Los términos de búsqueda fueron: distal radius fracture AND volar plate AND pronator quadratus. Se determinó la calidad metodológica según el manual de revisiones Cochrane. Resultados: en total se incluyeron 4 ensayos clínicos aleatorizados de adecuada calidad metodológica, lo cual corresponde al análisis de 213 participantes. Existen mejores resultados en la puntuación DASH a los 12 meses de seguimiento en el grupo de no reparación del músculo pronador cuadrado DM 2,8 [IC 95%: 0,51;5,10]. No hubo diferencias significativas al año de seguimiento en las puntuaciones de dolor, rangos de movilidad de la muñeca, fuerza de agarre e incidencia de complicaciones. Conclusión: no existe evidencia que sustente la reparación rutinaria del músculo pronador cuadrado posterior a la fijación interna con placa de bloqueo volar en las fracturas de radio distal. (AU)

Introduction: the pronator quadratus muscle functions as a dynamic stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint, and its repair after internal fixation with volar locking plate in distal radius fractures is controversial. Objective: to determine whether the repair of the pronator quadratus muscle influences the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with distal radius fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate. Materials and methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The analyzed databases were Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and Bireme/Lilacs (search performed until February 20th, 2023). The search terms were distal radius fracture AND volar plate AND pronator quadratus. Methodological quality was determined according to the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook. Results: a total of 4 randomized clinical trials of adequate methodological quality, corresponding to the analysis of 213 participants, were included. Better DASH scores were observed at 12 months of follow-up in the non-repair group of the pronator quadratus muscle, with a mean difference of 2.8 [95% CI 0.51; 5.10]. There were no significant differences at one-year follow-up in pain scores, wrist mobility ranges, grip strength, and incidence of complications. Conclusion: there is no evidence to support routine repair of the pronator quadratus muscle after internal fixation with volar locking plate in distal radius fractures. (AU)

Radial Nerve Supracondylar Block Versus Fracture Hematoma Block. Comparison of Their Efficacy in Cases of Fractures of the Distal Third of the Radius / Bloqueio supracondilar de nervo radial versus bloqueio de hematoma de fratura. Comparativo de sua eficácia em casos de fraturas do terço distal do rádio

Abstract Objective The present study compares the analgesic efficacy of two techniques to perform non-surgical reduction: fracture hematoma block and radial nerve supracondylar block. Methods Forty patients with fractures of the distal third of the radius, who required reduction, were selected in a quasi-randomized clinical trial to receive one of the anesthetic techniques. All patients signed the informed consent form, except for those who did not wish to participate in the study, had neurological injury, had contraindication to the procedure in the emergency room, or with contraindication to the use of lidocaine. To measure analgesia, the numerical pain rate scale was used at four different moments: preblock, postblock, during reduction, and after reduction; then three differences were calculated: the first between before and after blocking; the second between during reduction and after blockade; and the third between before blocking and after reduction. Results The fracture hematoma and supracondylar block groups showed the following mean values, respectively: 3.90 (1-10) and 3.50 (-6-10) in difference 1; 4.35 (-5-10) and 5.00 (-3-10) in difference 2; and 4.65 (1-10) and 3.80 (-3-10) in difference 3. Conclusion Both techniques proved to be efficient for analgesia, with mild superiority of hematoma block, but without statistical significance.

Resumo Objetivo O estudo compara a eficácia analgésica de duas técnicas para realizar redução incruenta: o bloqueio de hematoma da fratura e o bloqueio supracondilar de nervo radial. Métodos Quarenta pacientes com fraturas do terço distal do rádio, que necessitassem redução, foram selecionados em um ensaio clínico quasi-randomizado, para receber uma das técnicas anestésicas. Todos os pacientes assinaram o termo de consentimento ou assentimento, com exceção daqueles que não desejassem participar do estudo, tivessem lesão neurológica, com contraindicação ao procedimento na sala de emergências, ou com contraindicação ao uso da lidocaína. Para aferir a analgesia foi utilizada a escala numérica da dor em quatro momentos distintos: pré-bloqueio, pós-bloqueio, durante a redução e após a redução; em seguida, foram calculadas três diferenças: a primeira entre antes e após o bloqueio; a segunda entre durante a redução e após o bloqueio; e a terceira entre antes do bloqueio e após a redução. Resultados Os grupos do bloqueio de hematoma de fratura e bloqueio supracondilar apresentaram respectivamente os seguintes valores médios: 3.90 (1-10) e 3.50 (-6-10) na diferença 1; 4.35 (-5-10) e 5.00 (-3-10) na diferença 2; e 4.65 (1-10) e 3.80 (-3-10) na diferença 3. Conclusão As duas técnicas se provaram eficientes para analgesia, com discreta superioridade do bloqueio de hematoma, mas sem significância estatística.

Baseline predictors related to functional outcomes in patients older than sixty years with complex regional pain syndrome type 1 after distal radius fracture treated conservatively: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze baseline predictors of functional outcomes six weeks and at one year follow-up in patients older than 60 years with complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS I) after distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: A total of 120 patients with CRPS I after DRF were prospectively recruited. Presumptive relevant factors were collected and analyzed as potential baseline predictors. Additionally, functional outcomes were assessed at the beginning of physiotherapy treatment, at six weeks after finishing physiotherapy treatment, and at one year follow-up. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; Jamar dynamometer; and visual analog scale (VAS) were assessed. RESULTS: All participants completed the study. At 6 weeks, the main results showed an association of lower values of grip strength with female sex (p = 0.010), intra-articular DRFs (p = 0.030), longer immobilization time (p = 0.040), lower levels of physical activity (p < 0.001), higher levels of kinesiophobia (p = 0.010), and anxiety (p = 0.020). At 1-year follow-up, the results showed an association of lower values of DASH with higher BMI (p < 0.001) and longer immobilization time (p < 0.001); and higher values of VAS showed an association with older age (p = 0.010), higher BMI (p = 0.010), and lower levels of physical activity (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: At six weeks, factors such as BMI, immobilization time, physical activity, and kinesiophobia are associated with lower functional outcomes. Additionally, at one year follow-up, BMI, immobilization time, and physical activity continue to be associated with lower functional outcomes in patients with CRPS I after DRF treated conservatively.

COMBINED PLATE VERSUS EXTERNAL FIXATION FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the functional and radiological results of patients who had intra-articular comminuted distal radius fractures and were operated on with external fixation percutaneous pinning or the volar-dorsal combined plate osteosynthesis. Methods: In this study, 49 patients operated on and followed up for the comminuted distal radius fractures between May 2015 and January 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The surgical outcomes of the patients, who were operated on with combined dorsal-volar plate osteosynthesis or external fixation percutaneous pinning, were compared in this study. Functional and radiological scores were evaluated and analyzed statistically. Results: There was no statistical difference between external fixation and volar-dorsal combined plate groups regarding the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Mayo scoring system, range of motion, and grip strength values. Discussion: Although the combined volar-dorsal plate osteosynthesis technique had a longer operation time and a more complicated surgical procedure, the combined volar-dorsal plate osteosynthesis had lower complication rates and permitted early mobilization. The combined volar-dorsal plate osteosynthesis could be an alternative to external fixation percutaneous pinning. Level of Evidence III, Therapeutic Studies Investigating the Results of Treatment.

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os resultados funcionais e radiológicos de pacientes portadores de fraturas intra-articulares cominutivas do rádio distal, operados com fixação externa percutânea ou com osteossíntese volar-dorsal de placa combinada. Método: Foram avaliados 49 pacientes operados e acompanhados por fraturas cominutivas distais do rádio entre maio de 2015 e janeiro de 2019 retrospectivamente. Os resultados cirúrgicos dos pacientes operados com osteossíntese de placa volar-dorsal combinada ou fixação externa percutânea foram comparados. Os escores funcionais e radiológicos foram avaliados e analisados estatisticamente. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos de fixação externa e placa combinada volar-dorsal em relação ao questionário Deficiências do braço, ombro e mão (DASH), à Escala Visual Analógica (VAS), ao sistema de pontuação Mayo, à amplitude de movimento ou à avaliação de força de preensão. Conclusão: Embora a técnica combinada de osteossíntese da placa volar-dorsal tenha um tempo cirúrgico mais longo e procedimento mais complicado, a osteossíntese combinada da placa volar-dorsal apresentou menores taxas de complicações, permitindo a mobilização precoce. A osteossíntese combinada da placa volar-dorsal pode ser uma alternativa à fixação externa percutânea. Nível de Evidência III, Estudos terapêuticos ­ Investigação dos resultados do tratamento.

Evaluation of outcomes in intervention randomized clinical trials - distal radius fractures / Avaliação dos desfechos em ensaios clínicos randomizados de intervenção - fraturas distais do rádio

ABSTRACT Objectives: Describe the frequency and types of outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCT) of intervention for distal radius fractures, analyze how confusing outcome presentations can lead to misinterpretations, and suggest strategies to improve the reader's understanding of the decision-making process. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted through a systematized search on the PubMed® database in the last 10 years, in which only intervention RCT was included for distal radius fractures, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Of the primary outcomes analyzed in the 75 selected articles, 46.6% were classified as clinical outcomes, 20% as surrogate, 30.6% as composite, 1.3% as complex scales, and 1.3% as safety outcomes. 34.7% of the articles did not report adverse events. Conclusion: The presentation of outcomes with little clinical relevance represented more than half of the sample (53.4%) - such studies can harm the reader since they confuse the interpretation of scientific evidence; the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative could help health professionals in understanding and selecting the most appropriate therapeutic interventions for patients. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective comparative study .

RESUMO Objetivos: Descrever a frequência e os tipos de desfechos em ensaios clínicos randomizados (RCT) de intervenção para fraturas distais do rádio, analisar como apresentações confusas de desfechos podem levar a interpretações equivocadas e sugerir estratégias para melhorar a compreensão do leitor sobre o processo de tomada de decisão. Métodos: Foi realizado estudo retrospectivo mediante busca sistematizada na base de dados PubMed® nos últimos 10 anos, na qual foram incluídos apenas RCT de intervenção para fraturas do segmento distal do rádio, cujos desfechos foram analisados. Resultados: Dos desfechos primários analisados nos 75 artigos selecionados, 46,6% foram classificados como desfechos clínicos, 20% como substitutos, 30,6% como compostos, 1,3% como escalas complexas e em 1,3% como desfechos de segurança. 34,7% dos artigos não reportaram eventos adversos. Conclusão: A apresentação de desfechos com pouca relevância clínica representou mais da metade da amostra (53,4%) - tais estudos podem prejudicar o leitor, uma vez que confundem a interpretação das evidências científicas; a iniciativa Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) auxilia os profissionais de saúde na compreensão e seleção das intervenções terapêuticas mais adequadas para os pacientes. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo retrospectivo comparativo .

Combined plate versus external fixation for distal radius fractures / Placa combinada versus fixação externa para fraturas do rádio distal

ABSTRACT Objectives: This study aimed to compare the functional and radiological results of patients who had intra-articular comminuted distal radius fractures and were operated on with external fixation percutaneous pinning or the volar-dorsal combined plate osteosynthesis. Methods: In this study, 49 patients operated on and followed up for the comminuted distal radius fractures between May 2015 and January 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The surgical outcomes of the patients, who were operated on with combined dorsal-volar plate osteosynthesis or external fixation percutaneous pinning, were compared in this study. Functional and radiological scores were evaluated and analyzed statistically. Results: There was no statistical difference between external fixation and volar-dorsal combined plate groups regarding the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Mayo scoring system, range of motion, and grip strength values. Discussion: Although the combined volar-dorsal plate osteosynthesis technique had a longer operation time and a more complicated surgical procedure, the combined volar-dorsal plate osteosynthesis had lower complication rates and permitted early mobilization. The combined volar-dorsal plate osteosynthesis could be an alternative to external fixation percutaneous pinning. Level of Evidence III, Therapeutic Studies Investigating the Results of Treatment.

RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os resultados funcionais e radiológicos de pacientes portadores de fraturas intra-articulares cominutivas do rádio distal, operados com fixação externa percutânea ou com osteossíntese volar-dorsal de placa combinada. Método: Foram avaliados 49 pacientes operados e acompanhados por fraturas cominutivas distais do rádio entre maio de 2015 e janeiro de 2019 retrospectivamente. Os resultados cirúrgicos dos pacientes operados com osteossíntese de placa volar-dorsal combinada ou fixação externa percutânea foram comparados. Os escores funcionais e radiológicos foram avaliados e analisados estatisticamente. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos de fixação externa e placa combinada volar-dorsal em relação ao questionário Deficiências do braço, ombro e mão (DASH), à Escala Visual Analógica (VAS), ao sistema de pontuação Mayo, à amplitude de movimento ou à avaliação de força de preensão. Conclusão: Embora a técnica combinada de osteossíntese da placa volar-dorsal tenha um tempo cirúrgico mais longo e procedimento mais complicado, a osteossíntese combinada da placa volar-dorsal apresentou menores taxas de complicações, permitindo a mobilização precoce. A osteossíntese combinada da placa volar-dorsal pode ser uma alternativa à fixação externa percutânea. Nível de Evidência III, Estudos terapêuticos - Investigação dos resultados do tratamento.

ANATOMICAL STUDY OF VOLAR FACE OF DISTAL RADIUS AND COMPARISON WITH THE SHAPE OF LOCKING VOLAR PLATES.

Objective: To evaluate the volar cortical angle (VCA), the variation in lateral and intermediate columns, the shape and pattern of the watershed line (WL) of the distal radius and its correlation with locking volar plates available. Methods: 27 human cadaveric radial bones of the Department of Morphology and nine locking volar plates of six different companies were analyzed. VCA were measured from lateral and intermediate columns and their corresponding values on plates, as well as comparing the relief of radius and plates. In the WL analysis, we compared the standard format found on the radius and its equivalent on plates and divided into four types: biconvex, convex, ulnar convex and plan. Results: VCA varied between columns of the distal radius extremity. The mean in the lateral column was 153.40 degrees and 146.06 degrees in the intermediate. Four of nine plates showed no variation in volar angulation. From 27 distal radius, 13 showed convex pattern and 12 had biconvex, whereas most plates (seven of the nine analyzed) were biconvex drawing. Conclusion: Radial bone anatomy was variable. The intermediate column was, on average, steeper than lateral column. Synthes®-2 plate presented the closest design to the anatomy of the distal end of the radial bone, followed by Newclip®-2 plate. Level of Evidence II, Anatomic and Descriptive Study.

Objetivos: Avaliar o ângulo palmar cortical (APC) da extremidade distal do rádio, sua variação nas colunas lateral e intermédia, o formato e o padrão da watershed line (WL) e sua correlação com as placas volares bloqueadas disponíveis no mercado. Métodos: Foram analisados 27 ossos rádios do Departamento de Morfologia e nove placas de seis fabricantes diferentes. Medimos os APCs das colunas lateral e intermédia dos rádios e seus correspondentes nas placas, além de compararmos o relevo do terço distal do rádio e das placas. Quanto a WL, comparamos o formato nas peças e seu equivalente nas placas, sendo classificados em quatro tipos: biconvexo, convexo, convexo ulnar e plano. Resultados: O APC variou entre as colunas do rádio, sendo a média da coluna lateral 153,40° e, da intermédia 146,06°. Quatro das nove placas não apresentaram variação na angulação volar. Dos 27 rádios, 13 apresentaram padrão convexo e 12 biconvexo, enquanto a maioria das placas (sete das nove analisadas) tinham desenho biconvexo. Conclusão: A anatomia dos rádios foi variável entre as peças, sendo a coluna intermédia mais inclinada que a coluna lateral. A placa Synthes ® -2 foi a que apresentou relevo mais próximo dos achados anatômicos da extremidade distal do rádio, seguida pela Newclip ® -2. Nível de Evidência II, Estudo Anatômico Descritivo.

Prevalence of Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Fracture of the Distal Extremity of the Radius Treated with Volar Locking Plate.

Objective To evaluate the prevalence of persistent pain in the postoperative period of fractures of the distal extremity of the radius, as well as to detect early signs of neuropathic pain to develop protocols for the prevention of chronic postoperative pain. Methods Prospective study, carried out with 56 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the distal extremity of the radius with a volar locking plate from March to September 2020. The patients were submitted to assessment of neuropathic pain and functional capacity through the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) questionnaires. Qualitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and their correlation was analyzed using the Spearman Correlation and Equality of Two Proportions tests. Results A total of 43 patients aged between 18 and 66 years old were included in the present study; 39.5% of the participants scored ≥ 4 on the DN4 questionnaire. In relation to Quick-DASH, the average was 38.6. There was no statistically significant difference between the gender of the patient and the DN4 value ( p = 0.921). There was also no statistical correlation between the quantitative variables DN4 and Quick-DASH ( p = 0.061). Conclusions The prevalence of neuropathic pain in analyzed postoperative patients was significant, and the presence of signs and symptoms of neuropathic pain was a positive predictive factor for pain persistence beyond 2 months in 100% of cases. Thus, with early diagnosis of the neuropathic component of pain, associated with the nociceptive component, adequate pain control can be achieved, preventing its chronicity, and ensuring better rehabilitation.

Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of the New AO/OTA Classification for Distal Radius Fractures Compared with the Fernandez Classification.

Objective To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification for distal radius fractures and to compare it with the Fernandez classification system. Method A questionnaire was applied in the Qualtrics software on 10 specialists in hand surgery who classified 50 radiographs of distal radius fractures according to the Fernandez and AO/OTA 2018 classifications and, subsequently, indicated their treatment. The questionnaire was applied in time T0 and repeated after 4 weeks (t1) . The mean agreement between the answers, and the reliability and inter- and intraobserver reproducibility were analyzed using kappa indexes. Results The mean interobserver agreement in the Fernandez classification was 76.4, and it was 59.2% in the AO/OTA 2018 classification. The intraobserver agreements were 77.3 and 56.6%, respectively. The inter- and intraobserver kappa indexes for the Fernandez classification were 0.57 and 0.55, respectively, and, in the AO/OTA 2018 classification, they were 0.34 and 0.31, respectively. Conclusion The AO/OTA 2018 classification showed a low intra- and interobserver reproducibility when compared with the Fernandez classification. However, both classifications have low intra- and interobserver indexes. Although the Fernandez classification did not obtain excellent results, it remains with better agreement for routine use.

Outcomes of the Management of Distal Radius Fractures in the Last 5 Years: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials / Resultados do manejo de fraturas do rádio distal nos últimos 5 anos: metanálise de ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados

Abstract Objective Over the last decades, volar locking plates (VLPs) have been the mainstay treatment for distal radius fractures (DRFs). With the growing body of evidence, we systematically reviewed studies on recent VLP modifications. Methods A systematic search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE database for studies published in English in the past five years. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the operative treatment of DRFs. We excluded ongoing trials and studies not directly addressing DRF. The primary outcomes assessed were subjective (such as the scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire, the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation [PRWE], the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D], the 36-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], and the Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and objective clinical outcomes (the complication rate). Results We identified 29 articles published from 2016 to 2020 with high quality of evidence, except for one, which had evidence of moderate quality. In total, 3,079 DRFs were analyzed in the present study. All studies except one had a greater proportion of female participants, and only in 1 study the mean age of the sample was < 40 years old. There were no significant differences between the VLP and external fixation (EF) in terms of the scores on the DASH (p= 0.18) and PRWE (p= 0.77). The VLP alone without pronator quadratus (PQ) repair yielded significantly better outcomes. Conclusion In unstable fractures, the VLP and EF yielded comparable long-term results. There is no clear benefit of adding PQ repair to current the VLP surgical technique. Level of EvidenceLevel I

Resumo Objetivo Nas últimas décadas, a placa volar bloqueada (PVB) tem sido o tratamento principal para fraturas do rádio distal (FRDs). Com o crescente conjunto de evidências, revisamos sistematicamente estudos sobre modificações recentes na PVB. Métodos Uma pesquisa sistemática foi realizada utilizando o banco de dados PubMed/MEDLINE por estudos publicados em inglês nos últimos cinco anos. Os critérios de inclusão foram ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados (ECCRs) sobre o tratamento cirúrgico de FRDs. Excluímos ensaios e estudos em andamento que não abordavam diretamente a FRD. Os desfechos primários avaliados foram desfechos clínicos subjetivos (como as pontuações no questionário de Deficiências do Braço, Ombro e Mão [Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, DASH, em inglês], na Avaliação do Punho Classificada pelo Paciente [Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, PRWE, em inglês], no questionário Qualidade de Vida Europeia - 5 Dimensões [European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, EQ-5D, em inglês], na Pesquisa de Saúde por Formulário Curto de 36 Itens [36-item Short Form Health Survey, SF-36, em inglês], e na Escala Visual Analógica [EVA]) e objetivos (taxa de complicações). Resultados Identificamos 29 artigos publicados entre 2016 e 2020 com alta qualidade de evidência, exceto por um, de qualidade moderada. Ao todo, foram analisadas 3.079 FRDs neste estudo, Todos os estudos analisados, exceto por um, tinham maior proporção de participantes do gênero feminino, e somente em 1 estudo a idade média da amostra foi < 40 anos. Não houve diferença significativa entre a PVB e fixação externa (FE) em termos das pontuações no DASH (p= 0,18) e na PRWE (p= 0,77). Os resultados da PVB isolada, sem qualquer reparo do pronador quadrado (PQ), foram significativamente melhores. Conclusão Em fraturas instáveis, a PVB e a FE produziram resultados comparáveis no longo prazo. Não há um benefício claro em se adicionar reparo do PQ à técnica cirúrgica atual da PVB. Nível de EvidênciaNível I

Prevalence of Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Fracture of the Distal Extremity of the Radius Treated with Volar Locking Plate / Prevalência de dor neuropática em pacientes com fratura da extremidade distal do rádio tratada com placa volar bloqueada

Abstract Objective To evaluate the prevalence of persistent pain in the postoperative period of fractures of the distal extremity of the radius, as well as to detect early signs of neuropathic pain to develop protocols for the prevention of chronic postoperative pain. Methods Prospective study, carried out with 56 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the distal extremity of the radius with a volar locking plate from March to September 2020. The patients were submitted to assessment of neuropathic pain and functional capacity through the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) questionnaires. Qualitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and their correlation was analyzed using the Spearman Correlation and Equality of Two Proportions tests. Results A total of 43 patients aged between 18 and 66 years old were included in the present study; 39.5% of the participants scored ≥ 4 on the DN4 questionnaire. In relation to Quick-DASH, the average was 38.6. There was no statistically significant difference between the gender of the patient and the DN4 value (p= 0.921). There was also no statistical correlation between the quantitative variables DN4 and Quick-DASH (p= 0.061). Conclusions The prevalence of neuropathic pain in analyzed postoperative patients was significant, and the presence of signs and symptoms of neuropathic pain was a positive predictive factor for pain persistence beyond 2 months in 100% of cases. Thus, with early diagnosis of the neuropathic component of pain, associated with the nociceptive component, adequate pain control can be achieved, preventing its chronicity, and ensuring better rehabilitation.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a prevalência de dor persistente no pós-operatório de fratura da extremidade distal do rádio, assim como detectar precocemente sinais de dor neuropática com o intuito de desenvolver protocolos de prevenção da dor crônica pós-operatória. Métodos Estudo prospectivo, realizado com 56 pacientes submetidos a redução aberta e fixação interna de fratura da extremidade distal do rádio com placa volar bloqueada no período de março a setembro de 2020. Os pacientes foram submetidos a avaliação de dor neuropática e capacidade funcional através dos questionários Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) e Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH, na sigla em inglês). As variáveis qualitativas foram comparadas pelo teste de Mann-Whitney e sua correlação foi analisada pelos testes de correlação de Spearman e de Igualdade de Duas Proporções. Resultados Foram incluídos no presente estudo 43 pacientes, com idades entre 18 e 66 anos; 39,5% dos participantes apresentaram pontuação ≥ 4 no questionário Douleur neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4). Em relação ao Quick-DASH, a média foi de 38,6. Não houve diferença estatística significante entre o sexo do paciente e o valor do DN4 (p= 0,921). Também não foi encontrada correlação estatística entre as variáveis quantitativas DN4 e Quick-DASH (p= 0,061). Conclusões A prevalência de dor neuropática nos pacientes pós-operatórios analisados foi significativa e a presença de sinais e sintomas de dor neuropática foi fator preditivo positivo para a persistência da dor além de 2 meses em 100% dos casos. Assim, com diagnóstico precoce do componente neuropático de dor, associado ao componente nociceptivo, é possível obter o controle adequado da dor, impedindo sua cronificação e garantindo uma melhor reabilitação.

Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of the New AO/OTA Classification for Distal Radius Fractures Compared with the Fernandez Classification / Avaliação da reprodutibilidade intra- e interobservador da nova classificação AO/OTA para fraturas distais do rádio comparada com a classificação de Fernandez

Abstract Objective To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification for distal radius fractures and to compare it with the Fernandez classification system. Method A questionnaire was applied in the Qualtrics software on 10 specialists in hand surgery who classified 50 radiographs of distal radius fractures according to the Fernandez and AO/OTA 2018 classifications and, subsequently, indicated their treatment. The questionnaire was applied in time T0 and repeated after 4 weeks (t1). The mean agreement between the answers, and the reliability and inter- and intraobserver reproducibility were analyzed using kappa indexes. Results The mean interobserver agreement in the Fernandez classification was 76.4, and it was 59.2% in the AO/OTA 2018 classification. The intraobserver agreements were 77.3 and 56.6%, respectively. The inter- and intraobserver kappa indexes for the Fernandez classification were 0.57 and 0.55, respectively, and, in the AO/OTA 2018 classification, they were 0.34 and 0.31, respectively. Conclusion The AO/OTA 2018 classification showed a low intra- and interobserver reproducibility when compared with the Fernandez classification. However, both classifications have low intra- and interobserver indexes. Although the Fernandez classification did not obtain excellent results, it remains with better agreement for routine use.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a confiabilidade e a reprodutibilidade inter- e intraobservadores da nova classificação AO/OTA 2018 para fraturas distais do rádio e compará-la com o sistema classificatório de Fernandez. Métodos Foi aplicado um questionário no software Qualtrics em 10 especialistas em cirurgia da mão que classificaram 50 radiografias de fraturas distais de rádio de acordo com as classificações de Fernandez e AO/OTA 2018 e, posteriormente, indicaram seu tratamento. Esse questionário foi aplicado em tempo T0 e repetido após 4 semanas (t1). Analisou-se a média de concordância entre as respostas e confiabilidade e reprodutibilidade inter- e intraobservadores utilizando os índices kappa. Resultados A concordância média interobservador para a classificação de Fernandez foi de 76,4, e de 59,2% para a AO/OTA 2018. A concordância intraobservador foi de 77,3 e 56,6%, respectivamente. O índice de kappa inter- e intraobservador para a classificação de Fernandez foram de 0,57 e de 0,55, respectivamente, e a classificação AO/OTA 2018 obteve 0,34 e 0,31, respectivamente. Conclusão A classificação AO/OTA 2018 mostrou uma reprodutibilidade intra- e interobservadores baixa quando comparada à classificação de Fernandez. Porém, ambas as classificações apresentam índices intra- e interobservadores baixos. Embora a classificação de Fernandez não tenha obtido resultados excelentes, ela permanece com melhor concordância para o uso rotineiro.

IS VOLAR PLATING IN DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES SAFE REGARDING PRONATOR QUADRATUS?

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether isokinetic strength decrease significantly after using volar plating for distal radius fractures and evaluate the pronator quadratus muscle regarding atrophy. Methods: This study took place between 2011 and 2015 and included 18 distal radius fracture patients (group 1) who were treated via volar plating at least one year prior and 14 healthy controls (group 2). All participants were tested isokinetically. Grip strength, radiological evaluation, wrist range of motion, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand and visual analog scale scores were assessed for clinical and functional outcomes. Ultrasonography evaluated the pronator quadratus muscle thicknesses. Results: The peak supination torque (PT) and supination work per repetition (WPT) strength values significantly decreased (p:0.039, p:0.025, respectively). Although we determined an 11% pronation PT deficit and a 19% pronation WPT deficit, neither were significant. In group 1, the pronator quadratus muscle thickness decreased 5.9% ± 13.3 in the radial area and 9.7% ± 10.5 in the interosseous area according with ultrasonography; these results were not statistically significant compared to group 2. All clinical and functional outcomes were not statistically significant between the groups. Conclusion: The use of volar plating after distal radius fractures is a safe method regarding isokinetic strength and pronator quadratus muscle atrophy. Level of evidence III; Retrospective case-control study .

Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo investigar se as forças isocinéticas diminuem significativamente após o uso de placa volar para tratamento de fraturas do rádio distal e avaliar o músculo pronador quadrado quanto à atrofia. Métodos: Este estudo realizado entre 2011 e 2015 incluiu 18 pacientes com fratura do rádio distal (grupo 1) que tenham sido tratadas com placa volar pelo menos um ano antes e 14 pessoas saudáveis como controle (grupo 2). Todos os participantes foram testados isocineticamente. Força de preensão, avaliação radiológica, amplitude de movimento do punho, deficiências do braço, ombro e mão e escores da escala visual analógica foram avaliados clinica e funcionalmente. A ultrassonografia avaliou a espessura do músculo pronador quadrado. Resultados: A força máxima do torque de supinação (TM) e do trabalho por repetição (ER) de supinação diminuíram significativamente (p: 0,039, p: 0,025, respectivamente). Embora tenhamos determinado um déficit de TM de pronação de 11% e um déficit de ER de pronação de 19%, nenhum dos dois foi significativo. No grupo 1, a espessura do músculo pronador quadrado diminuiu 5,9% ± 13,3 na área radial e 9,7% ± 10,5 na área interóssea, segundo ultrassonografia; estes resultados não foram estatisticamente significativos em comparação com o grupo 2. Nenhum resultados clínico ou funcional foi estatisticamente significativo entre os grupos. Conclusão: O uso de placa volar após fraturas do rádio distal é um método seguro em relação à força isocinética e atrofia do músculo pronador quadrado. Nível de evidência III; estudo retrospectivo de caso-controle .