Comparison of Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Laser Photocoagulation in the Treatment of Type I Retinopathy of Prematurity in Malaysia: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy, anatomical outcomes, and refractive outcomes of laser photocoagulation (LPC) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in the treatment of type I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) at one-year follow-up. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on the treatment of type I ROP and aggressive ROP (A-ROP) using LPC or IVR in three Malaysian hospitals providing pediatric ophthalmology services from January 2019 to December 2021. Information on gestational age, birth weight, ROP zone and stage, and underlying comorbidities was collected. Parameters for evaluating treatment efficacy include the time taken to achieve complete regression, the regression rate, and the reactivation rate. The anatomical and refractive outcomes were evaluated at one year of adjusted age. RESULTS: This study included 92 eyes from 46 infants. Of these, 42 eyes received LPC as the initial treatment, while 50 eyes underwent IVR. A higher percentage of infants with cardiovascular disease were treated with IVR (66.7%) compared to LPC (40%) (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in gestational age, birth weight, respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, or intraventricular hemorrhage between the two treatment groups (p>0.05). Infants treated with LPC had a higher regression rate than those treated with IVR, but they were also significantly more myopic and had worse best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Conversely, infants treated with IVR experienced a significantly higher reactivation rate compared to those treated with LPC. Logistic regression analysis showed no significant associations between gestational age, birth weight, plus disease, zone 1 ROP, and the choice of initial treatment with the reactivation of ROP. CONCLUSIONS: Both LPC and IVR effectively treat type I ROP in infants, with IVR yielding superior anatomical and refractive outcomes and LPC offering a lower reactivation rate. Understanding individual patient characteristics is crucial for treatment selection.

Effect of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Objective: To explore the clinical effect of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation (LP) in treating diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 118 patients with DME admitted to The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2021 to March 2023. Among them, 38 patients received LP alone (Laser-group), 39 patients received ranibizumab alone (Ranibizumab-group), and 41 patients received LP combined with ranibizumab (Combined-group). The improvement of macular edema (ME), visual acuity, and complications between the groups were compared. Results: The time of ME regression, exudation absorption and fundus hemorrhage absorption in the Combined-group was shorter than in the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). After treatment, the CMT and RNV of the three groups decreased compared to pretreatment levels and were lower in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). BCVA increased after the treatment in all groups, and was markedly higher in the Combined-group than in the Laser and the Ranibizumab-groups (P<0.05). NO were higher in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group. The post-treatment VEGF levels decreased in all groups, and were significantly lower in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the Combined-group was lower than in the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared to ranibizumab or LP alone, ranibizumab combined with LP is more effective in reducing ME in patients with DEM, and is associated with fewer complications.

Long acting delivery and therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

INTRODUCTION: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) represents a leading cause of severe visual impairment in individuals over 50 years of age in developed nations. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections have become the standard of care for treating nAMD; however, monthly or bimonthly dosing represents significant time and cost burden due to the disease's chronic nature and limited medication half-life. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes innovative therapeutics and delivery methods for nAMD. Emerging methods for extended drug delivery include high molar concentration anti-VEGF drugs, intravitreal sustained release devices, reservoirs for intravitreal delivery, and gene therapy biofactories. In addition to VEGF-A, therapies targeting inhibition of VEGF-C and D, the angiopoetin-2 (Ang-2)/Tie-2 pathway, tyrosine kinases, and integrins are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: The evolving therapeutic landscape of nAMD is rapidly expanding our toolkit for effective and durable treatment. Recent FDA approvals of faricimab (Vabysmo) and high dose aflibercept (Eylea HD) for nAMD with potential extension of injection intervals up to four months have been promising developments for patients and providers alike. Further research and innovation, including novel delivery techniques and pharmacologic targets, is necessary to validate the efficacy of developing therapeutics and characterize real-world outcomes. demonstrating promise in expanding treatment durability.

Characteristics of retinal vascularization in reactivated retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment and clinical outcome after reinjection of ranibizumab.

This study aimed to determine whether the state of retinal vascularization after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection can help predict the risk of reactivated retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment and whether repeated ranibizumab injection will be effective in such cases. We retrospectively reviewed 24 infants (43 eyes) who received ranibizumab monotherapy between January 2021 and December 2022. All eyes were classified as having non-retreated ROP or retreated ROP. The state of ROP at the time of treatment, the time required for resolution of plus disease, and the extent of vascularization at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment were analyzed. Extent of temporal retinal vascularization was measured with serial fundus images using disc-fovea distance (DF) unit and disc diameter (DD). Reactivated ROP requiring treatment occurred in six infants (25.0%) and ten eyes (23.3%) after ranibizumab treatment. The mean retreatment interval was 9.0 ± 3.3 weeks (range 4-16). In the retreated ROP group, the time required for the resolution of plus disease after primary injection was longer compared to the control group (13.3 days vs 5.2 days), with a mean ROP regression time of 3.4 weeks. All eyes in the retreated ROP showed retinal vascularization < 0.5 DF from the original site at 4 weeks after injection. In 90% of cases with retreated ROP, the extent of vascularization at 8 weeks after injection was within 1 DF from the original ROP site, and all cases showed reactivation in the posterior Zone II area. The extent of retinal neovascularization in the retreated group was an average of 0.7 DD (vs 1.7 DD) and 1.3 DD (vs 3.3 DD) at 4 and 8 weeks after injection, respectively. After ranibizumab retreatment, only one reactivated case with vitreous traction progressed to focal retinal detachment, while all other cases regressed with peripheral vascular development. The continuation of delayed retinal blood vessel development after ≥ 8 weeks may indicate a high likelihood of reactivated ROP requiring treatment. In the absence of vitreous traction, ranibizumab reinjection is likely to be effective in treating reactivated ROP requiring treatment.

Transitioning from Aflibercept to Biosimilar Ranibizumab in Neovascular AMD (The TRANSFORM Trial): A Multicenter Observational Study.

Purpose: This study investigates the efficacy of transitioning patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from aflibercept (T1) to biosimilar ranibizumab (T2), an approach not previously documented in literature. Methods: In this multicenter observational study, patients over 50 years of age with nAMD were shifted from intravitreal aflibercept (IVI AFL) to biosimilar ranibizumab (B-RBZ) due to financial constraints. This study employed standardized ophthalmological methods to assess visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), and subretinal and intraretinal fluid. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and linear regression. Results: A total of 29 eyes (12 males and 17 females) were analyzed. Mean age was 72.55 ±6.43 years. VA improved significantly during T1, with a mean increase from 55.0 ± 10.2 to 70.0 ± 8.5 ETDRS letters at the switch time point (p < 0.01), then a slight decrease to 62.3 ± 8.9 at 12 months (p < 0.05) was noted during T2. The mean CMT decreased notably from 400 ± 50 to 290 ± 45 µm at the switch. The final CMT at 12 months after switching to B-RBZ was 280 ± 40 µm (p < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in the retinal and intra retinal fluid during T1, followed by a gradual increase during T2. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was noted between the presence of intraretinal fluid and increased injection frequency of B-RBZ. Conclusion: The switch from IVI AFL to IVI B-RBZ in patients with nAMD demonstrated efficacy in maintaining the VA and macular anatomy, with some challenges in fluid management.

Supplemental Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injections in Eyes Treated with the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab in the Archway Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the proportion and characteristics of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) that receive supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections due to changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and/or central subfield thickness (CST), and to investigate the safety and efficacy of supplemental injections in eyes with the PDS. DESIGN: Post-hoc analyses of data from the phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-comparator Archway trial (NCT03677934). PARTICIPANTS: Adults with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening previously responsive to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. INTERVENTION: 418 patients were randomized to the PDS with ranibizumab 100 mg/mL with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (Q24W) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg for 96 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 246 eyes treated with the PDS Q24W and assessed for supplemental treatment criteria, the vast majority (94.6%-98.4%) did not receive supplemental treatment during each retreatment interval, with 87.4% not receiving supplemental treatment at any point during the trial. Of the 31 eyes receiving supplemental treatment, 58.1% received 1 injection and 32.3% received 2. At baseline, eyes receiving supplemental treatment were significantly more likely to have thicker retinas (mean CST 370.5µm vs 304.4µm; P = 0.0001), subretinal fluid (54.8% vs 21.2%; P < 0.0001), and larger pigment epithelial detachment height (215.7µm versus 175.9µm; P = 0.003). These features have previously been associated with difficult-to-treat nAMD. Whereas BCVA and CST generally remained constant throughout the trial in eyes without supplemental treatment, the small number of eyes receiving supplemental treatment on average lost 1 line of vision from baseline to week 96 (mean -5.7 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study score letters) and CST continued to increase over time. Absolute BCVA at week 96 was similar irrespective of supplemental treatment status (71.1 and 73.7 letters). BCVA and CST generally improved within 28 days of supplemental treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although the PDS Q24W effectively maintains vision and retinal stability in most eyes with nAMD, a small proportion of patients with features of difficult-to-treat nAMD may benefit from supplemental intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and initial close monitoring is recommended.

Macular Ischemia Changes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept and Ranibizumab.

Τhis study aims to assess changes in the fovea avascular zone (FAZ) in treatment naïve patients receiving aflibercept or ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular edema (DME). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, OCT, and OCT-angiography imaging were performed at baseline and 1 month after each injection. Injections of either aflibercept or ranibizumab were administered monthly for 6 consecutive months. FAZ in the superficial (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) using OCT angiography was recorded for each visit. Fifty eyes from fifty patients with a mean age of 67.0 ± 10.7 years were included in the study. Twenty-five patients received aflibercept and twenty-five received ranibizumab. BCVA was 40.8 ± 10.0 and increased to 52.1 ± 7.9 ETDRS letters at the last visit (p < 0.001). CRT was 295.6 ± 34.0 at baseline and 247.9 ± 29.7 at the last study visit (p < 0.001). SCP FAZ was 350.6 ± 79.5 µm2 at baseline and 339.0 ± 71.3 µm2 after sox monthly injections (p = 0.132). DCP FAZ was 558.6 ± 199.0 µm2 at baseline and 459.5 ± 156.1 µm2 after six monthly injections (p < 0.001). There was no effect of the choice of ranibizumab or aflibercept on DCP FAZ change (p = 0.277). In conclusion, treatment with 6 monthly injections of ranibizumab and aflibercept led to an increase in BCVA and a decrease in CRT and DCP FAZ area. Both drugs led to an improvement in DCP ischemia.

Acute Noninfectious Anterior Ocular Inflammation Following Ranibizumab Biosimilar Intravitreal Injection in a Patient With Recent COVID-19 Vaccination.

Even in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, it is prudent to exercise caution regarding the timing between intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and COVID-19 vaccinations, as ocular inflammation can occur following both procedures. However, this perspective has not been sufficiently discussed thus far. Herein, we report a case of acute noninfectious anterior ocular inflammation following an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab biosimilar (RBZ BS, Senju Pharmaceuticals, Japan) in a patient recently vaccinated against COVID-19. A 74-year-old male with myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the left eye was treated with RBZ BS intravitreal injection. He received his fourth COVID-19 vaccination with messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-1273 (Moderna) two days prior to his second RBZ BS intravitreal injection. He reported no systemic symptoms associated with the fourth COVID-19 vaccination. The second RBZ BS intravitreal injection was safely performed without complications. However, a few hours later, he experienced blurred vision without ocular pain in his left eye, a symptom not observed after the first injection. He visited a local ophthalmologic clinic the following day and was subsequently referred to our hospital due to anterior ocular inflammation in the left eye. His vision in the left eye was 0.3 decimal best-corrected visual acuity. Examination revealed non-granulomatous anterior ocular inflammation with 3+ cells and 2+ flare in the left eye. Anterior vitreous inflammation, keratic precipitates, or conjunctivitis was absent. Fundus examination also showed no signs of posterior inflammation. Both fluorescence angiography and indocyanine green angiography revealed staining corresponding to CNV without retinal vasculature leakage. There is nothing abnormal with the right eye based on the examination. Given that the noninfectious ocular inflammation was likely, based on the acute onset of symptoms within less than 24 hours following the RBZ BS intravitreal injection, and the presence of non-granulomatous inflammation only in the anterior segment without ocular pain, betamethasone eye drops four times daily was initiated in the left eye on the first day following the second RBZ BS intravitreal injection. Then, his ocular inflammation improved to mild by the fourth day post-injection. His eye eventually cleared, with no cells or flare in the anterior chamber at five months. Eventually, given the clinical course of good response to only topical steroid therapy, the diagnosis of noninfectious anterior ocular inflammation following RBZ BS in the case of a recent episode of COVID-19 vaccination was retrospectively confirmed. Although this case represents one of the initial instances of noninfectious ocular inflammation following RBZ BS (Senju Pharmaceuticals) administration, sterile ocular inflammation after other intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy has already been well-reported. In addition, given the recent COVID-19 vaccination, the ocular inflammation might be influenced by the vaccination, synergistically leading to vaccine-associated uveitis with similar signs and symptoms. In conclusion, to prevent such a complex situation, it is advisable to consider an adequate interval between COVID-19 vaccination and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Differences between pathologic and non-pathologic high myopia in 4-year outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy for macular neovascularization.

This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the difference in 4-year outcomes of ranibizumab or aflibercept therapy for macular neovascularization (MNV) with high myopia between pathologic myopia (PM) and non-PM. This study was conducted at Kyoto University Hospital and included consecutive treatment-naïve eyes with active myopic MNV, in which a single intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept injection was administered, followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen for 4 years. Based on the META-PM study classification, eyes were assigned to the non-PM and PM groups. This study analyzed 118 eyes of 118 patients (non-PM group, 19 eyes; PM group, 99 eyes). Baseline, 1-year, and 2-year best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were significantly better in the non-PM group (P = 0.02, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively); however, the 3-year and 4-year BCVA were not. The 4-year BCVA course was similar in both groups. However, the total number of injections over 4 years was significantly higher in the non-PM than in the PM group (4.6 ± 2.6 vs. 2.9 ± 2.6, P = 0.001). Four-year BCVA significantly correlated only with baseline BCVA in both non-PM (P = 0.047, ß = 0.46) and PM groups (P < 0.001, ß = 0.59). In conclusion, over the 4-year observation period, the BCVA course after anti-VEGF therapy for myopic MNV was similar in the eyes with non-PM and those with PM; however, more additional injections in a PRN regimen were required in the eyes with non-PM compared to those with PM. Thus, more frequent and careful follow-up is required for the eyes with non-PM compared with those with PM to maintain long-term BCVA.

Neuroretinitis With Severe Macular Edema in Dual Infection: Challenges in Management.

Neuroretinitis is a potentially vision-threatening condition distinguished by swelling of the optic disc followed by the emergence of a macular star pattern. The majority of these clinical observations are typically linked to infections caused by bacteria, parasites, or viruses. We report a case of dual infections in neuroretinitis complicated with severe macular edema. A 49-year-old lady presented with sudden onset left eye blurring of vision of one-week duration. Visual acuity was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/60 in the left eye. There was a left positive relative afferent pupillary defect with impaired optic nerve functions. A fundoscopy of the left eye showed optic disc swelling with a macular star. The right optic disc was also swollen. Vasculitis changes were observed in both posterior poles. The ocular coherence tomography of the left eye revealed the existence of macular edema, subretinal fluids, and an epiretinal membrane that extended from the optic disc to the fovea. Serological examinations were positive for toxoplasma and herpes simplex virus type 1. The patient was started on oral azithromycin, oral acyclovir, and oral corticosteroids. Left macular edema persisted despite the treatment. The patient was given a trial of a single injection of intravitreal ranibizumab. A remarkable reduction of subretinal fluids was seen post-intravitreal injection and continuation of medications. Intravitreal ranibizumab has shown significant outcomes in neuroretinitis with severe macula edema.

Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness and Sensitivity after Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Background/Objectives: To investigate changes in visual acuity and retinal sensitivity and thickness after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) for macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) patients. Methods: This study evaluated 34 patients with treatment-naïve BRVO and at least 6 months' follow-up after pro re nata IRI. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was determined as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). In nine retinal regions, retinal sensitivity was calculated by MP-3 microperimetry; and in nine macular subfields, retinal thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT); evaluations were performed before IRI and then monthly for 6 months. Results: IRI significantly improved visual acuity and retinal sensitivity and thickness. In patients with good improvement in BCVA (change in logMAR > 0.2), IRI significantly improved retinal sensitivity in eight of nine regions, i.e., in all except the outer non-occluded region, and in patients with poor improvement in BCVA (change in logMAR < 0.2), in six of nine regions, i.e., not in the inner, outer non-occluded, and outer temporal regions. We found significant differences in the trend profile in the foveal, outer occluded, and inner nasal regions between patients with good and poor improvement in BCVA. Conclusions: The findings suggest that IRI improves visual acuity and retinal sensitivity and thickness and that retinal effects may vary between patients with good and poor visual improvement.

Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Anti-VEGF Drugs for the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy: An Overview.

The discovery of antivascular endothelial growth factor medications has resulted in a substantial change in diabetic retinopathy treatment. The most common cause of diabetic retinopathy blindness is Diabetic Macular Edema. The pathophysiology of Diabetic Macular Edema is thought to include the well-known pro-angiogenic and pro-permeability factor vascular endothelial growth factor. Over the past decade, drugs that impede the functions of vascular endothelial growth factors have established themselves as a standard-of-care treatment for a range of ocular ailments and improved patients' clinical results with diabetic retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema, and their frequency has grown exponentially with the introduction of these agents Pegaptanib, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept which are approved for ophthalmic indications, while Bevacizumab is used off-label. These medications delivered intravitreally have halted the vascular development of diabetic retinopathy. Various randomized trials have proven that antivascular endothelial growth factor medication is safe and effective in preserving vision. Following an extensive period of preclinical development aimed at enhancing and defining its biological impacts, these drugs were shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating diabetic retinopathy and other ophthalmic conditions. Data from various sources suggest that Pegaptanib, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept are costly, while Bevacizumab is cost-effective, and in low and middle-income nations, it is thus a desirable therapy choice. However, issues with compounding, counterfeiting, and off-label usage restrict its availability in many nations. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse effects, and contraindications of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents are discussed, and the results of clinical trials evaluating their efficacy are summarized.

Effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes: a Meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME) in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, EBSCO were comprehensively searched for studies comparing vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes with DME. Clinical outcomes of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), the mean number of intravitreal injection and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Six studies involving 641 eyes were included. Final visual gain significantly improved and CMT significantly reduced in vitrectomized eyes at 6mo and 12mo visits (P<0.05). Although the mean reduction in CMT among non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly greater than in vitrectomized eyes at the 6mo [mean difference (MD)=53.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 28.03 to 78.72, P<0.0001] and 12mo (MD=49.65, 95%CI: 19.58 to 79.72, P=0.01), no significant difference was detected in improvement in BCVA at either 6mo (MD=0.05, 95%CI: -0.02 to 0.13, P=0.14) or 12mo (MD=0.03, 95%CI: -0.04 to 0.09, P=0.43). Injection number of ranibizumab in non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly less than that in vitrectomized eyes during 6-month period (MD=0.60, 95%CI: 0.16 to 1.04, P=0.008), while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups during 12mo of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Evidence from current study suggests that IVR was useful for both vitrectomized group and non-vitrectomized group with DME. Although less reduction in macular thickness is found in vitrectomized group, visual improvement between two groups is similar.

Long-term follow-up of the cognitive function in children after intravitreal ranibizumab for retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term cognitive function in children treated with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for retinopathy of prematurity(ROP), and the impact of IVR on the growth and ocular development. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the premature children aged 4 to 9 years who received monotherapy of IVR (IVR group, n = 25) or monotherapy of laser photocoagulation (LP) (LP group, n = 33) for ROP, and the same age premature children with no ROP (Control group, n = 26) were enrolled from 2020 to 2022 in the pediatric fundus clinic of Shenzhen Eye Hospital. Main outcome measures were full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) and index score using the Chinese version of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fourth edition (WISC-IV) and Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-fourth edition (WPPSI-IV). All children were examined and analyzed for growth and ocular development by recording the height, weight, head circumference, spherical equivalent (SE), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and axial length (AL). RESULTS: There were 17 children in IVR group, 17 in LP group, and 11 in Control group who received the WISC-IV assessment. There were no significant differences in FSIQ, verbal comprehension index, perceptual reasoning index, working memory index, processing speed index, general ability index and cognitive efficiency index among the three groups. There were 8 children in IVR group, 16 in LP group, and 15 in Control group who received the WPPSI-IV assessment. There were no significant differences in FSIQ, verbal comprehension index, visuospatial index, fluid reasoning index, working memory index, non-verbal index, general ability index and cognitive efficiency index among the three groups. There was no significant difference in BCVA among the three groups (P = 0.74), however, there is an increase for AL in IVR group when compared with LP group (22.60 ± 0.58 vs. 22.13 ± 0.84, P = 0.003), and the ROP patients of IVR group have a significant increase in the AL compared to the Control group(22.60 ± 0.58 vs. 22.03 ± 0.71, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Children with a history of IVR have a similar cognitive function outcomes compared to those with a history of LP or were premature without ROP. ROP children with a history of IVR has longer AL than those treated with LP.

Three-Year Outcomes of VEGF Inhibitors in Naive Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Fight Retinal Blindness!

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 3-year outcomes of VEGF inhibitors in the treatment of cystoid macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in an international multicenter cohort of eyes. DESIGN: Multicenter, international, BRVO database study. SUBJECTS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients (760 eyes) undergoing intravitreal therapy for BRVO for 3 years in a multicenter international setting. METHODS: Demographics, visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters, central subfield thickness (CST), treatments, number of injections, and visits data was collected using a validated web-based tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity gain at 3 years in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters. Secondary outcome measures included anatomical results, treatment pattern, and percentage of completers. A subgroup analysis by study drug was conducted for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Mean adjusted VA change was +11 letters (95% confidence interval 9-13), mean adjusted change in CST was -176 µm (-193, -159). Median number of injections/visits was 16 of 24 at 3 years of follow-up. Most eyes received VEGF inhibitors exclusively (89%, n = 677) and as a monotherapy in 71% (n = 538). Few eyes were switched to steroids (11%, n = 83). Suspensions in treatment >180 days occurred in 26% of study eyes. Aflibercept showed greater CST reductions (-147 vs. -128 vs. -114 µm; P < 0.001) and significantly lower switching rates (14% vs. 38% vs. 33%; P < 0.001) compared with ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This international study of 3-year BRVO outcomes after starting treatment with VEGF inhibitors found adequate visual and anatomical results in routine clinical care. Visual outcomes were similar among the different initiating VEGF inhibitors, although eyes starting with aflibercept had better anatomical outcomes and a lower switching rate. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Capsular Block Syndrome after an Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab: A Case Report.

Introduction: We present a case of capsular block syndrome that occurred after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in a patient with age-related macular degeneration, which has not been reported in the literature. Case Presentation: A 78-year-old male presented with decreased visual acuity in the right eye. Slit-lamp examination findings were unremarkable; however, AMD was diagnosed based on fundus examination, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Subsequently, the patient was administered an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. A slit-lamp examination revealed residual cortical material, numerous inflammatory cells, and posterior capsular distension 1 week after the injection. OCT showed an adhesion of the intraocular lens to the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis site. The patient's vision improved following Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Conclusion: Meticulous cortical removal is crucial during phacoemulsification to prevent capsular block syndrome. In patients with a history of cataract surgery, verifying the absence of residual cortical material before administering an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab is important.

Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Sun's Ranibizumab Biosimilar in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Phase 3, Double-Blind Comparative Study.

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to evaluate comparability in terms of efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of Sun's ranibizumab biosimilar with reference ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: This prospective, randomised, double-blind, two-group, parallel-arm, multicentre, phase 3 comparative study included patients with nAMD ≥ 50 years, randomised (in a 2:1 ratio) in a double-blind manner to receive 0.5 mg (0.05 mL) intravitreal injection of either Sun's ranibizumab or reference ranibizumab in the study eye every 4 weeks until week 16 (total of four doses). RESULTS: Primary endpoint results demonstrated equivalence in the proportion of patients who lost fewer than 15 letters from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) to the end of week 16 (99% of patients in Sun's ranibizumab and 100% in reference ranibizumab; p > 0.9999), with the proportional difference (90% confidence interval) at -1% (-2.51, +0.61) lying within a pre-specified equivalence margin. Visual acuity improved by 15 or more letters in 43% of Sun's ranibizumab group and 37% of the reference ranibizumab group (p = 0.4267). The mean increase in BCVA was 15.7 letters in Sun's ranibizumab group and 14.6 letters in the reference ranibizumab group (p < 0.001 within both groups and p = 0.5275 between groups). The mean change in central macular thickness was comparable between groups (p = 0.7946). Anti-ranibizumab antibodies were found in one patient of the reference ranibizumab group, while neutralising antibodies were not found in any patients. Both products were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Sun's ranibizumab biosimilar is found to be therapeutically equivalent to reference ranibizumab in patients with nAMD. There were no additional safety or immunogenicity concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2020/09/027629, registered on 07 September 2020.

Visual Outcome and Fluid Changes Between Eyes With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Receiving Biosimilar CKD-701 or Reference Ranibizumab Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcome and fluid features of a proposed biosimilar, CKD-701, versus the reference ranibizumab in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of CKD-701 and ranibizumab. A total of 73 PCV eyes were assigned randomly to either CKD-701 (36 eyes) or ranibizumab (37 eyes). The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), pigment epithelial detachment (PED) volume, and fluid features were compared. RESULTS: After three loading injections, the mean change in BCVA (letters) was +7.50 in the CKD-701 group and +6.32 in the ranibizumab group (p = .447). The changes in CRT and PED volume of the CKD-701 group (-107.25 ± 102.66 µm and -0.22 ± 0.46 mm3) were similar to those of the ranibizumab group (-96.78 ± 105.00 µm and -0.23 ± 0.54 mm3) (p = .668 and p = .943, respectively). Proportions of eyes with subretinal, intraretinal and sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) fluids after three loading injections were not different between CKD-701 group (33.3%, 13.9% and 42.9%) and ranibizumab group (51.4%, 16.2% and 40.0%) (p = .071, p = 1.000 and p = .808). The visual and anatomical changes were similar between two groups at month 6 and 12 (all, p > .05). CONCLUSION: Biosimilar CKD-701 monotherapy resulted in comparable visual and anatomical changes to those achieved with reference ranibizumab in PCV eyes.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs Compared With Panretinal Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs (anti-VEGFs) compared with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A discrete event simulation model was developed, informed by individual participant data meta-analysis. The model captures treatment effects on best corrected visual acuity in both eyes, and the occurrence of diabetic macular edema and vitreous hemorrhage. The model also estimates the value of undertaking further research to resolve decision uncertainty. RESULTS: Anti-VEGFs are unlikely to generate clinically meaningful benefits over PRP. The model predicted anti-VEGFs be more costly and similarly effective as PRP, generating 0.029 fewer quality-adjusted life-years at an additional cost of £3688, with a net health benefit of -0.214 at a £20 000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Scenario analysis results suggest that only under very select conditions may anti-VEGFs offer potential for cost-effective treatment of PDR. The consequences of loss to follow-up were an important driver of model outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGFs are unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment for early PDR compared with PRP. Anti-VEGFs are generally associated with higher costs and similar health outcomes across various scenarios. Although anti-VEGFs were associated with lower diabetic macular edema rates, the number of cases avoided is insufficient to offset the additional treatment costs. Key uncertainties relate to the long-term comparative effectiveness of anti-VEGFs, particularly considering the real-world rates and consequences of treatment nonadherence. Further research on long-term visual acuity and rates of vision-threatening complications may be beneficial in resolving uncertainties.

Angioid Streaks Remain a Challenge in Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment.

Aim: Angioid streaks (ASs) are a rare retinal condition and compromise visual acuity when complicated with choroidal neovascularization (CNV). They represent crack-like dehiscences at the level of the Bruch's membrane. This objective narrative review aims to provide an overview of pathophysiology, current treatment modalities, and future perspectives on this condition. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed using "PubMed", "Web of Science", "Scopus", "ScienceDirect", "Google Scholar", "medRxiv", and "bioRxiv." Results: ASs may be idiopathic, but they are also associated with systemic conditions, such as pseudoxanthoma elasticum, hereditary hemoglobinopathies, or Paget's disease. Currently, the main treatment is the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) to treat secondary CNV, which is the major complication observed in this condition. If CNV is detected and treated promptly, patients with ASs have a good chance of maintaining functional vision. Other treatment modalities have been tried but have shown limited benefit and, therefore, have not managed to be more widely accepted. Conclusion: In summary, although there is no definitive cure yet, the use of anti-VEGF treatment for secondary CNV has provided the opportunity to maintain functional vision in individuals with AS, provided that CNV is detected and treated early.