The work relative value estimation assessment in China: an empirical research for common surgical procedures.

Objectives: China's National Health Service Items Standard (NHSIS) establishes a relative value system and plays an important role in pricing. However, there are few empirical evaluations of the objectivity of the NHSIS-estimated relative value. Methods: This paper presents a comparison between physician work relative value units (wRVUs) estimates for 70 common surgical procedures from NHSIS and those from the U.S. Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). We defined the ratio of the wRVUs for sample procedures to the benchmark procedure (inguinal hernia repair) as a standardized relative value unit (SRVU), which was used to standardize the data for both schedules. We examined the variances in the ranking and quantification of SRVUs across specialties and procedures, as well as how SRVUs impact procedure reimbursement prices between the two schedules. Results: There was no systematic difference between MHSIS-estimated SRVUs and MPFS-estimated, but the dispersion of MPFS-estimated SRVU was greater than that of MHSIS-estimated, and the discrepancies increased with surgical risk and technical complexity. The discrepancies of SRVUs were significant in cardiothoracic procedures. Additionally, whether SRVUs were based on MPFS or MHSIS, there was a positive association between them and payment prices. However, in terms of the impact of SRVUs on payment pricing, the NHSIS system was lower than the MPFS system. Conclusion: China has made incremental progress in estimating the relative value of healthcare services, but there are shortcomings in valuation methods and their impact on pricing. The modular assessment method should be considered as a component to optimize reform.

Financial (dis)incentives to surgical management of head and neck cancer care.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) often require complex surgical reconstruction. This retrospective, cross-sectional study compares financial factors influencing HNC and breast cancer (BC) care to examine care disparities. METHODS: Pricing data from 2012 to 2021 was abstracted from the CMS Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. Nonprofit and research support was quantified by searching the NIH, IRS, and GuideStar databases. New York State Department of Health data from 2015 to 2019 was analyzed to compare costs, charges, and payer mix. RESULTS: HNC reconstructive procedures reimburse lower than comparable breast procedures (p < 0.05). Nonprofit and research support for HNC is disproportionately low relative to disease burden. Patients hospitalized for HNC surgical procedures generated higher costs and lower charges than patients with BC (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comparatively low procedure reimbursement, low nonprofit support, and high cost of care for patients with HNC relative to patients with BC may contribute to care disparities for patients with HNC.

Compensation based on work relative value unit for cardiovascular surgeons in Iran: A mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: Work relative value unit (wRVU) is a tool for assessing surgeons' performance, compensation, and productivity. It appears that wRVU for cardiovascular procedures does not consider complexity and its value for lengthy operations is low. The aim of the study is to determine wRVU for cardiovascular procedures in Iran according to the proposed approach. MATTERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted as a mixed method in teaching hospitals in Tabriz in the period of September 2020 to December 2021. According to Hospital Information System and expert opinions, six procedures in cardiovascular surgery were included in the study. They were compared with 18 procedures in neurosurgery, orthopedics, and otorhinolaryngology in terms of the operation time and wRVU/min. Then, we calculated new wRVUs for the selected procedures based on surgeons' opinions, time measurements, and anesthetists' points of view by content analysis in qualitative and statistical analysis in quantitative parts. RESULTS: Among the six cardiac procedures, the wRVU for five was under-estimated. The wRVU/min value ranged from 0/28 to 1/15 in the studied procedures. Findings demonstrate no significant relationship between the length of operations and the wRVU announced by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (P value >0/05). Compared to studied procedures in four specialties, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has the longest surgery time at 417 minutes. According to anesthesiologists, cardiovascular; orthopedics; ear, nose, and tongue; and neurosurgery specialties obtained 4/2, 2/9, 2/8, and 4, respectively, in terms of surgery duration, complexity, risk, and physical effort. CONCLUSION: Despite policymakers' attempts to bring justice to payments, it seems that there has been little progress in paying cardiovascular surgeons. Improper payment to cardiovascular surgeons will affect the future of the workforce in this specialty. Today, the need to reconsider the wRVUs in heart specialty is felt more than before.

Comparison of emergency department workloads before and during the COVID-19 pandemic as assessed using relative value units.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess and compare emergency department (ED) workloads by using relative value units (RVUs) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective observational study investigated the RVUs of a single ED from 2019 to 2021. We calculated the mean number of patients per day (PPD) for each year and selected the days when the number of patients was equal to the yearly mean PPD for each of the three years. We calculated the total RVUs per day and RVUs per patient and compared them. RESULTS: We analyzed the RVUs of 12 days in 2019 (mean PPD, 88), 10 days in 2020 (mean PPD, 75), and 14 days in 2021 (mean PPD, 83). The mean of the total RVUs per day were as follows: 533,057.5±66,239.1 in 2019, 505,994.6±48,935.4 in 2020, and 634,219.6±64,024.2 in 2021 (P<0.001). The RVUs per patient in the three year-groups were significantly different (6,057.5±752.7 in 2019, 6,746.6±652.5 in 2020, and 7,641.2±771.4 in 2021; P<0.001). Post hoc analyses indicated that the total RVUs per day and the RVUs per patient in 2021 were significantly higher than in 2019 or 2020, although the mean PPD in 2019 was the highest. CONCLUSION: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean RVUs per patient have increased, suggesting that the workload per patient may also have increased in the regional emergency medical center.

Misaligned Incentives in Benign Prostatic Enlargement Surgery: More Complex and Efficacious Procedures Are Earning Fewer Relative Value Units.

Background: Relative value units (RVUs) are the measure of value used in US Medicare reimbursement. Medicare determines physician work RVUs (wRVUs) from the Relative Value Update Committee (RUC) for a procedure based on operative time, technical skill and effort, mental effort and judgment, and stress. In theory, work RVUs should account for the complexity and operative time involved in a procedure. The aim of this study was to assess whether major procedures for treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) are fairly compensated based on complexity and operative time in the RVU system and compare them with the intended reimbursement. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Physician Fee Schedule were queried from 2015 to 2017. Single, current, procedural terminology codes associated with BPE treatments were included: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photovaporization of the prostate (PVP), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), retropubic simple prostatectomy (RSP), and suprapubic simple prostatectomy (SSP). The CMS operative times and the NSQIP real data were used in turn to calculate separate values for wRVUs per hour (wRVUs/hr) of operative time. The wRVUs/hr derived from CMS operative times represent RUC-estimated wRVUs/hr and wRVUs/hr derived from NSQIP represent actual wRVUs/hr. Results: A total of 27,664 cases were included from the NSQIP dataset. Median wRVU was 15.3 (interquartile range [IQR] 12.2-15.3), median operative time 50 minutes (IQR 33-74), and median wRVUs/hr 17.0 (IQR 11.6-26.2). RUC-estimated wRVUs/hr were TURP 12.2, PVP 12.2, RSP 9, SSP 9.3, and HoLEP 7.3. The actual wRVUs/hr were TURP 19.1, PVP 15.5, RSP 10.2, HoLEP 9.4, and SSP 7.6. Conclusions: Laser enucleation and simple prostatectomy are highly complex and efficacious procedures for treating BPE, yet the current payment schedule assigns these procedures the least amount of wRVUs/hr. Financial incentives for performing BPE surgeries are clearly misaligned.

The impact of removing global periods on pediatric surgeon reimbursement.

PURPOSE: CMS has proposed removing postoperative care from the global periods for surgical procedures and instead requiring surgeons to bill for postoperative visits using evaluation & management (E&M) codes. This policy may alter reimbursement to pediatric surgeons. METHODS: To assess the impact of this policy, NSQIP-pediatric data were used to calculate median LOS for high-volume procedures with 10 or 90 day global periods. We then merged these data with CMS physician work time and RVU files. A CMS LOS variable was created by counting the number of hospital-based E&M codes built into the global period based on the fact that if global periods are removed, surgeons may only bill one E&M code per postoperative day. We then compared the CMS and NSQIP LOS values. RESULTS: The dataset included 201 CPT codes with NSQIP LOS estimates derived from a median of 137 operations. Twenty-nine procedures (14.4%) had higher, 24 (16.9%) had the same, and 138 (68.7%) had lower NSQIP median LOS than current CMS values. On average, NSQIP values were 40.0% (95% confidence interval [95CI] -50.0, -29.9%) lower than CMS values. Based on a daily average work RVU per postoperative E&M code of 1.09 (95% CI 1.05, 1.12), and $35.78 per RVU (2017 rate), surgeons in this sample would experience a cumulative annual reduction in reimbursement of approximately $3.4 M following the policy change. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric surgical procedures have RVU valuations that include more hospital-based E&M codes than the current median number of postoperative days. Holding all else equal, the removal of global periods would therefore reduce reimbursement for pediatric surgeons. The downstream effects of this policy change, such as the impact on the quality of clinical care, are uncertain and warrant further investigation. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical research paper. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Relative value units do not adequately account for operative time in pediatric urology.

BACKGROUND: Relative value units (RVUs) are the measure of value used in United States Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. The Relative Update Committee (RUC) determines physician work RVU (wRVUs) based on operative time, technical skill and effort, mental effort and judgment, and stress. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether operative time is adequately accounted for in the wRVU system in pediatric urology. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Participant User File (ACS-NSQIPP-PUF) was reviewed from 2012 to 2017. Most common single pediatric urology current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were included. The primary variable was wRVU per hour of operative time (wRVU/h). Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relative influence that operative time had on wRVU/h. RESULTS: 25,432 cases were included in the final study population from 45 unique CPT codes. The median operative time was 79 min, and the median RVU/h was 12.2. Procedures with operative time less than 79 min had higher wRVU/h compared with procedures longer than 79 min (14.5 vs 10.5, p < 0.001). Procedures with higher than average incidence of any complications had a lower wRVU/h (9.0 vs. 14.6 p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that each additional hour of operative time was expected to decrease wRVU/h by 4.2 (-0.70 per 10 min, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.69, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.39). CONCLUSION: This analysis of contemporary large pediatric population national-level data suggests that the wRVU system significantly favors shorter and less complex procedures in Pediatric Urology. Pediatric urologists performing longer and more complex procedures are not adequately compensated for the increase in complexity. EVIDENCE LEVEL III: Retrospective comparative study.

The influence of healthcare financing on cardiovascular disease prevention in people living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: People living with HIV are diagnosed with age-related chronic health conditions, including cardiovascular disease, at higher than expected rates. Medical management of these chronic health conditions frequently occur in HIV specialty clinics by providers trained in general internal medicine, family medicine, or infectious disease. In recent years, changes in the healthcare financing for people living with HIV in the U.S. has been dynamic due to changes in the Affordable Care Act. There is little evidence examining how healthcare financing characteristics shape primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention among people living with HIV. Our objective was to examine the perspectives of people living with HIV and their healthcare providers on how healthcare financing influences cardiovascular disease prevention. METHODS: As part of the EXTRA-CVD study, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 51 people living with HIV and 34 multidisciplinary healthcare providers and at three U.S. HIV clinics in Ohio and North Carolina from October 2018 to March 2019. Thematic analysis using Template Analysis techniques was used to examine healthcare financing barriers and enablers of cardiovascular disease prevention in people living with HIV. RESULTS: Three themes emerged across sites and disciplines (1): healthcare payers substantially shape preventative cardiovascular care in HIV clinics (2); physician compensation tied to relative value units disincentivizes cardiovascular disease prevention efforts by HIV providers; and (3) grant-based services enable tailored cardiovascular disease prevention, but sustainability is limited by sponsor priorities. CONCLUSIONS: With HIV now a chronic disease, there is a growing need for HIV-specific cardiovascular disease prevention; however, healthcare financing complicates effective delivery of this preventative care. It is important to understand the effects of evolving payer models on patient and healthcare provider behavior. Additional systematic investigation of these models will help HIV specialty clinics implement cardiovascular disease prevention within a dynamic reimbursement landscape. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03643705 .

Association of implicit intensity values incorporated into work RVUs with objective measures.

BACKGROUND: The "intensity" of a surgical procedure is supposed to be incorporated into work RVUs to allow higher compensation rates for more complex procedures. However, updates to work RVUs are subjective and it is unclear if these intensity values correlate to objective measures of a procedure's complexity. METHODS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data were used to calculate intraservice intensity values for CPT codes in 2017 ("CMS intensity values"). Twenty-six objective measures- spanning patient, case, and risk characteristics - were generated using the 2017 participant use file from NSQIP. CMS intensity values were compared to objective measures using scatterplots and correlations. RESULTS: Among 473 CPT codes, CMS intensity values ranged from 0.0031 to 0.142 work RVUs/minute. CMS intensity values were positively associated with 3 objective measures, negatively associated with 5 measures, and not associated with the remaining 18 measures. CONCLUSIONS: Despite intensity values - and therefore compensation rates - varying over 40-fold in the wRVU scale, there was generally no association between their magnitude and objective measures of surgical intensity.

Relative Value Units do Not Adequately Account for Operative Time of Urological Surgery.

PURPOSE: Physician work relative value units are determined based on operative time, technical skill, mental effort and stress. In theory, work relative value units should account for the operative time involved in a procedure, resulting in similar work relative value units per unit time for short and long procedures. We assessed whether operative time is adequately accounted for by the current work relative value units assignments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed from 2015 to 2017. The 50 most frequently coded urology CPT codes were included in the study. The primary variable was work relative value units per hour of operative time (work relative value units per hour). Linear regression analysis was used to assess the associations between work relative value units, operative time and the work relative value units per hour variable. RESULTS: A total of 105,931 cases were included in the study. Among the included urology CPTs the median work relative value units was 15.26, median operative time was 48 minutes and median work relative value units per hour was 11.2. CPTs with operative time less than 90 minutes had higher work relative value units per hour compared with longer procedures (12.2 vs 8.7, p <0.001). Univariable analysis revealed that each additional hour of operative time was associated with a decrease in work relative value units per hour by 1.32 (-0.022 per minute, 95% CI -0.037 - -0.001, p <0.001) and that work relative value units were not statistically associated with work relative value units per hour (-0.093, 95% CI -0.193 - 0.007, p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of large population, national level data suggests that the current work relative value units assignments do not proportionally compensate for longer operative times.

Complexity of care processes in a radiation oncology service and its implications concerning the distribution of work and associated costs.

INTRODUCTION: Among several different instruments developed to compare the complexity of healthcare processes, relative value units (RVUs) are among the most well-known and widely used in hospitals, but despite being a recognized management tool, in our setting, the few studies published have been based on theoretical assumptions. Our objective was to assess the level of complexity of each process in our service and to determine the RVUs generated, in order to relate complexity and costs. METHODS: During 2014, data were retrospectively collected for 840 cancer patients from the Radiation Oncology Department, Araba University Hospital. Activity times and costs were subsequently assigned to calculate RVUs for each activity, cancer subtype and treatment option. RESULTS: The activity associated with the lowest cost, assigned an RVU of 1, was simulation (phase changes) in treatment, with an annual cost of €9933, while that with the highest cost, assigned the greatest number of RVUs, was administration of treatment by radiotherapy technicians (RTTs) (€633,754 and 63.80 RVUs). The care process that consumed the most resources was adjuvant treatment of breast cancer (€998,070), equivalent to 364.62 RVUs compared to the cheapest subtype of adjuvant treatments or 2440 RVUs compared to the care process that used the fewest resources overall. CONCLUSION: The most expensive activities are those which are the most complex or consume the most resources. Knowledge of RVUs may be employed to analyse our activity and assess the possibility of increasing the efficiency of our service without prejudicing quality.

The Calculation of Geographic Practice Cost Index and the Feasibility of Using It in Korean Payment System / 보건행정학회지

The fee-for-service system is used as the main payment system for health care providers in Korea. It has been argued that it can't reflect differences in the medical practice costs across regions because the fee schedule is calculated based on the average cost. So, some researchers and providers have disputed that there is need for adopting geographic practice cost index (GPCI) used in the United States for the Medicare program for the elderly to the fee-for-service payment system. This study performed to identify whether the difference in the practice costs among regions exists or not and to examine the feasibility of applying GPCI to Korea payment system. For this purpose, we calculated modified-GPCI and examined considerations to introduce GPCI in Korea. First we identified available data to calculate GPCI. Second, we made applicable GPCI equations to Korea payment system and computed it based on four types of regions (metropolitan, urban, suburban, and rural). We also categorize the regions based on the availability of the medical resources and the capability of utilizing them. As a result, we found that there wasn't any significant difference in the GPCI by regional types in general, but the indices of rural areas (0.91–0.98) was relatively low compared to the indices of other regions (0.96–1.07). Considering the need to use GPCI floor, the pros and cons of using GPCI, and the concern of the regional imbalance of resources, the introduction of GPCI needs to be carefully considered.

A Resource-Based Relative Value for Clinical Research Nurses' Workload.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to measure the relative value (RV) of clinical research nurses' (CRNs') workload based on the resource-based relative value scale. METHODS: A quantitative, descriptive research design was used. Data were collected from 70 CRNs in 7 clinical trial institutions using a structured questionnaire including time, technical effort, mental effort, and stress for each service. The RV of work (RVW) of each service was calculated by multiplying time and relative value of intensity based on "explaining the informed consent" as the reference service. RESULTS: The CRNs' RVW was the highest in "preparing auditing" and the lowest in "paying compensation" among 55 services. Ten services showed higher RV intensity than the reference service, 26 services were lower, and 18 services were equal to the reference service. While the service that showed the highest and lowest RVW was the same in 3 specialties (oncology, cardiology, and endocrinology), the rank of the other services was not consistent by specialty. CONCLUSION: The RVW derived from this study makes it easy to calculate each CRN's total workload, so we recommend that the managers use RVW to assign the new services or studies to a certain CRN. And, we also recommend future studies using an objective method such as observations to calculate the time of each service.

Using the simplified case mix tool (sCMT) to identify cost in special care dental services to support commissioning.

To commission dental services for vulnerable (special care) patient groups effectively, consistently and fairly an evidence base is needed of the costs involved. The simplified Case Mixed Tool (sCMT) can assess treatment mode complexity for these patient groups. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the sCMT can be used to identify costs of service provision. CLINICAL SETTING: Patients (n=495) attending the Sussex Community NHS Trust Special Care Dental Service for care were assessed using the sCMT. MAIN MEASURES: sCMT score and costs (staffing, laboratory fees, etc.) besides patient age, whether a new patient and use of general anaesthetic/intravenous sedation. METHOD: Statistical analysis (adjusted linear regression modelling) compared sCMT score and costs then sensitivity analyses of the costings to age, being a new patient and sedation use were undertaken. Regression tables were produced to present estimates of service costs. RESULTS: Costs increased with sCMT total scale and single item values in a predictable manner in all analyses except for 'cooperation'. Costs increased with the use of IV sedation; with each rising level of the sCMT, and with complexity in every sCMT category, except cooperation. CONCLUSION: Costs increased with increase in complexity of treatment mode as measured by sCMT scores. Measures such as the sCMT can provide predictions of the resource allocations required when commissioning special care dental services.

Clinical benefit, price and approval characteristics of FDA-approved new drugs for treating advanced solid cancer, 2000-2015.

Background: Prices of anti-cancer drugs are skyrocking. We aimed to assess the clinical benefit of new drugs for treating advanced solid tumors at the time of their approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and to search for a relation between price and clinical benefit of drugs. Materials and methods: We included all new molecular entities and new biologics for treating advanced solid cancer that were approved by the FDA between 2000 and 2015. The clinical benefit of drugs was graded based on FDA medical review of pivotal clinical trials using the 2016-updated of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF) and the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). Characteristics of drugs and approvals were obtained from publicly available FDA documents and price was evaluated according to US Medicare, US Veterans Health Administration and United Kingdom market systems. Results: The FDA approved 51 new drugs for advanced solid cancer from 2000 to 2015; we could evaluate the value of 37 drugs (73%). By the ESMO-MCBS, five drugs (14%) were grade one (the lowest), nine (24%) grade two, 10 (27%) grade three, 11 (30%) grade four and two (5%) grade five (the highest). Thus, 13 drugs (35%) showed a meaningful clinical benefit (scale levels 4 and 5). By the ASCO-VF which had a range of 3.4-67, the median drug value was 37 (interquartile range 20-52). We found no relationship between clinical benefit and drug price (P = 0.9). No characteristic of drugs and of approval was significantly associated with clinical benefit. Conclusion: Many recently FDA-approved new cancer drugs did not have high clinical benefit as measured by current scales. We found no relation between the price of drugs and benefit to society and patients.

Dental responsibility loadings and the relative value of dental services.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate responsibility loadings for a comprehensive list of dental services, providing a standardized unit of clinical work effort. METHODS: Dentists (n = 2500) randomly sampled from the Australian Dental Association membership (2011) were randomly assigned to one of 25 panels. Panels were surveyed by questionnaires eliciting responsibility loadings for eight common dental services (core items) and approximately 12 other items unique to that questionnaire. In total, loadings were elicited for 299 items listed in the Australian Dental Schedule 9th Edition. Data were weighted to reflect the age and sex distribution of the workforce. To assess reliability, regression models assessed differences in core item loadings by panel assignment. Estimated loadings were described by reporting the median and mean. RESULTS: Response rate was 37%. Panel composition did not vary by practitioner characteristics. Core item loadings did not vary by panel assignment. Oral surgery and endodontic service areas had the highest proportion (91%) of services with median loadings ≥1.5, followed by prosthodontics (78%), periodontics (76%), orthodontics (63%), restorative (62%) and diagnostic services (31%). Preventive services had median loadings ≤1.25. CONCLUSION: Dental responsibility loadings estimated by this study can be applied in the development of relative value scales.

Qualitative analysis of the clinical head nurses' recognition of RBRVS / 现代临床护理

Objective To explore the recognition degree of resource based relative value scales (RBRVS) among the head nurses of different clinical departments and provide references for the hospitals to gradually adjust and improve the RBRVS performance allocation program. Method Toally 13 clinical head nurses were recruited and in-depth interviews were phenomenologically conducted. The acquired data were analyzed. Results Six themes were extracted: RBRVS's reflection of the value of nursing operation, avoidance of nonstandard registering and charging, differences in performance distribution across clinical departments, unreasonable allocation between internal medical and surgical departments, small numbers of chargeable nursing items, larger coefficient gap between doctors and nurses and inaccuracy in data collection. Conclusions RBRVS for performance evaluation is concerned about the work strength and technical difficulty, but less attention to quality problems is attached. In implementation, we should reasonably treat differences between the clinical departments, setting up reasonable gap coefficient and increasing their enthusiasm. Moreover, as the direct leaders of nursing teams, the nursing management should master the principles of RBRVS and improve the management ability of head nurses.

Qualitative analysis of the clinical head nurses' recognition of RBRVS / 现代临床护理

Objective To explore the recognition degree of resource based relative value scales (RBRVS) among the head nurses of different clinical departments and provide references for the hospitals to gradually adjust and improve the RBRVS performance allocation program. Method Toally 13 clinical head nurses were recruited and in-depth interviews were phenomenologically conducted. The acquired data were analyzed. Results Six themes were extracted: RBRVS's reflection of the value of nursing operation, avoidance of nonstandard registering and charging, differences in performance distribution across clinical departments, unreasonable allocation between internal medical and surgical departments, small numbers of chargeable nursing items, larger coefficient gap between doctors and nurses and inaccuracy in data collection. Conclusions RBRVS for performance evaluation is concerned about the work strength and technical difficulty, but less attention to quality problems is attached. In implementation, we should reasonably treat differences between the clinical departments, setting up reasonable gap coefficient and increasing their enthusiasm. Moreover, as the direct leaders of nursing teams, the nursing management should master the principles of RBRVS and improve the management ability of head nurses.

A Study on the Appropriateness of Health Insurance Fee in Main Nursing Practices / 임상간호연구

PURPOSE: This study was to present improvement strategy and the problems of the nursing fee in national health insurance system. METHODS: A total of 23 nursing activities performed by nurses were selected. Data were collected the relative value score and criteria of the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Agency. Sixty clinical nursing experts panels were composed and nursing time surveyed self-reported method. The actual fee was calculated through the nursing time, relative value score and actual labor costs. Nextly, the labor costs analyzed was compared with that in the national health insurance. RESULTS: Although the practices were mainly performed by the nurse, other occupations have been recorded as main practitioners and the time of the nursing activity is partially improperly reflected. Additionally, although the nurse practiced mainly in glucose (semi-quantitative) test, it was confirmed that the principal practitioner was described as a clinical pathologist. The the labor cost gap was estimated that is 9.3 times (median) and 11.9 times (average) in this analysis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that it is necessary to legislate a policy that can improve the quality of clinical nursing by reinforcing the appropriateness and improving nursing fee through reflection of the actual time spent for nursing care.