Comparison of accuracy, revision, and perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted spine surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Pedicle screw placement guidance is critical in spinal fusions, and spinal surgery robots aim to improve accuracy and reduce complications. Current literature has yet to compare the relative merits of available robotic systems. In this review, the authors aimed to 1) assess the current state of spinal robotics literature; 2) conduct a meta-analysis of robotic performance based on accuracy, speed, and safety; and 3) offer recommendations for robotic system selection. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature review across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus as of April 28, 2022, for studies on approved robots for placing lumbar pedicle screws. Three reviewers screened and extracted data relating to the study characteristics, accuracy rate, intraoperative revisions, and reoperations. Secondary performance metrics included operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure. The authors statistically compared the performance of the robots using a random-effects model to account for variation within and between the studies. Each robot was also compared with performance benchmarks of traditional techniques including freehand, fluoroscopic, and CT-navigated insertion. Finally, we performed a Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill test to assess for the presence of publication bias. RESULTS: The authors identified 46 studies, describing 4670 patients and 25,054 screws, that evaluated 4 different robotic systems: Mazor X, ROSA, ExcelsiusGPS, and Cirq. The weighted accuracy rates of Gertzbein-Robbins classification grade A or B screws were as follows: ExcelsiusGPS, 98.0%; ROSA, 98.0%; Mazor, 98.2%; and Cirq, 94.2%. No robot was significantly more accurate than the others. However, the accuracy of the ExcelsiusGPS was significantly higher than that of traditional methods, and the accuracies of the Mazor and ROSA were significantly higher than that of fluoroscopy. The intraoperative revision rates were Cirq, 0.55%; ROSA, 0.91%; Mazor, 0.98%; and ExcelsiusGPS, 1.08%. The reoperation rates were Cirq, 0.28%; ExcelsiusGPS, 0.32%; and Mazor, 0.76% (no reoperations were reported for ROSA). Operative times were similar for all robots. Both the ExcelsiusGPS and Mazor were associated with significantly less blood loss than the ROSA. The Cirq had the lowest radiation exposure. Robots tended to be more accurate and generally their use was associated with fewer reoperations and less blood loss than freehand, fluoroscopic, or CT-navigated techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic platforms perform comparably based on key metrics, with high accuracy rates and low intraoperative revision and reoperation rates. The spinal robotics publication rate will continue to accelerate, and choosing a robot will depend on the context of the practice.

Risk factors for reoperation after discectomy of lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease.

Objectives: Discectomy is the most common surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD) disease. However, 5%-24% of patients undergo a second surgery due to recurrent disc herniation. Materials and Methods: This study was aimed to identify the risk factors for reoperation after discectomy of lumbar HIVD and recommend treatment for patients with a high risk of reoperation. We recruited patients diagnosed as having single-level lumbar HIVD who underwent open discectomy from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2012 in our hospital. We used a survival curve to inspect the survival time and reoperation rate after surgery. We discussed the correlation of reoperation rate with discectomy level, body mass index, heavy lifting after surgery, sex, and age. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation between the experience of a surgeon and the reoperation rate. Results: A total of 619 patients were enrolled in our study. Most patients were 40-60 years old (48.8%), and most of them had herniation at L4/5 level (48.9%). The 8-year survival rate was 92%. Weight lifting after surgery may increase the reoperation rate by 115 and 18 times for those >60 years and <40 years, respectively. In addition, less experience of the surgeon and female sex had a high reoperation rate. Conclusion: Postoperative working modification may be very important for preventing patients from recurrent HIVD. For elderly people with HIVD, a more conservative therapy could be selected. If patients with lumbar spine hypermobility or severe degeneration require wide laminectomy, primary fusion should be considered.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Repair Without Aortic Root Replacement: A Single-Center Experience.

Background Aortic valve (AV) repair is a challenging procedure due to its complexity, lower reproducibility, and steep learning curve. To examine its durability and validity, we investigated mid-term outcomes following AV repair without aortic root replacement. Methods Between March 2007 and May 2018, we retrospectively identified 14 patients who underwent AV repair without aortic root replacement at our institution. We investigated their baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes, including the reoperation rate due to aortic regurgitation (AR) recurrence. Furthermore, we divided them into two groups: those who required reoperation due to AR recurrence (Group R) and those who did not require reoperation (Group F), and statistically compared them. Results The median age was 52.5 years (IQR: 42.0-60.8), with 11 male patients (78.6%). Eight patients (57.1%) had a bicuspid AV. Five cases (35.7%) underwent reoperation due to AR recurrence during a median follow-up period of 5.5 years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between Group R (n=5, 35.7%) and Group F (n=9, 64.3%), including AR etiology, AV repair procedure, and intraoperative AR grade after the final declamp. All cases in Group R had at least mild to moderate AR on the echocardiogram before discharge. Regarding the AR grade before discharge, Group R had a significantly higher grade than Group F (p = 0.013). Conclusions The indication for AV repair for AR might need to be reassessed due to the considerable mid-term reoperation rate. Cases of AV repair with more than mild AR at discharge should be carefully monitored, as they are likely to require future reoperation for AR.

A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques and Standard Open Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation is a common spinal disease that causes low back pain; surgery is required when conservative treatment is ineffective. There is a growing demand for minimally invasive surgery in younger patient populations due to their fear of significant damage and a long recovery period following standard open discectomy. The development history of minimally invasive surgery is relatively short, and no gold standard has been established. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to find, via a network meta-analysis, the best treatment for low back pain in younger patient populations. STUDY DESIGN: Network meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. Data quality was evaluated using RevMan 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre for The Cochrane Collaboration), while STATA 14.0 (StataCorp LLC) was used for the network meta-analysis and to merge data on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, complication, blood loss, reoperation rate, and function score. RESULTS: We included 50 randomized controlled trials, involving 7 interventions; heterogeneity and inconsistency were acceptable. Comparatively, microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy were the best surgical procedures from the aspects of VAS score and ODI score, while standard open discectomy was the worst one from the aspect of ODI score. Regarding complications, tubular discectomy was preferred with the fewest complications. Additionally, microendoscopic discectomy outperformed other surgical procedures in reducing blood loss and reoperation rate. LIMITATIONS: First, follow-up data were not reported in all included studies, and the follow-up time varied from several months to 8 years, which affected the results accuracy of our study to some extent. Second, there were some nonsurgical factors that also affected the self-reported outcomes, such as rehabilitation and pain management, which also brought a certain bias in our study results. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard open discectomy, minimally invasive surgical procedures not only achieve satisfactory efficacy, but also microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy can obtain a more satisfactory short-term VAS score and ODI score. Microendoscopic discectomy has significant advantages in blood loss and reoperation rate, and tubular discectomy has fewer postoperative complications.

Midterm outcome of superior capsular reconstruction using doubled acellular human dermal allograft for irreparable rotator cuff tear.

BACKGROUND: Thicker (folded) facia lata autografts have been shown to be superior to thinner grafts and single-layered acellular human dermal (HD) allografts for superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in biomechanical studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes following SCR for irreparable supraspinatus tears using doubled (folded) HD allograft. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had undergone SCR using doubled HD allograft between February 2012 and January 2020 were recruited in a continuous manner in this retrospective study. The inclusion criteria were SCR performed for irreparable supraspinatus tear and a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score. The secondary outcome measures were complications and revision surgery. A subgroup analysis was performed between patients who received a "standard" graft of mean 3-mm thickness or a "thick" graft of mean 4.4-mm thickness. RESULTS: One patient was lost to follow-up. A total of 31 patients (31 shoulder joints) were analyzed with a mean follow-up duration of 48 months (range, 25-96 months). Following surgery, there was significant improvement in the ASES score from 18.1 ± 14.3 (preoperative) to 76.3 ± 25.1 (postoperative) (P < .001), with a satisfactory clinical outcome obtained in 83.8% of the patients. In a subset of 8 patients completing 5 years' follow-up, the clinical improvements were sustained. The percentage of patients with a clinically successful outcome was higher among those with thick grafts compared to those with standard grafts, although this failed to reach statistical significance (94.4% vs. 69.2%, risk ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.99, P = .13). One patient within the standard group underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSION: SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears with doubled HD allograft results in improved clinical outcomes and low reoperation at midterm follow-up duration.

[Comparison of the reoperation rates of three techniques for tibial tuberosity transposition in medial patellar dislocation]. / Vergleich der Reoperationsraten von drei Techniken zur Fixation der bei medialer Patellaluxation transponierten Tuberositas tibiae.

INTRODUCTION: A common technique for the treatment of medial patellar luxation is the lateral transposition of the tibial tuberosity. Two variations of a new surgical method with a retention plate and fixation with a wire or a security plate, were tested against each other and against the existing fixation with Kirschner wires and a tension band by the number of reoperations. The new method using a retention plate and security plate showed the lowest rate of reoperations (5 %), followed by the new technique using retention plate and wire (14 %) and the existing fixation with Kirschner wires and a tension band (34 %). A possible explanation for the good result of the new method can be the fixation of the implants on the medial side of the tibia and the non-use of Kirschner wires.

INTRODUCTION: La transposition latérale de la tubérosité tibiale est une technique courante pour le traitement de la luxation rotulienne médiale. Deux variantes d'une nouvelle méthode chirurgicale avec une plaque de rétention et une fixation avec un fil métallique respectivement un étrier en titane ont été testées l'une par rapport à l'autre et par rapport à la fixation usuelle avec des broches de Kirschner et un haubanage en fonction du nombre de réopérations. La nouvelle méthode utilisant une plaque de rétention et un étrier a montré le taux le plus bas de réopérations (5 %), suivie par la nouvelle technique utilisant une plaque de rétention et une broche (14 %) et la fixation usuelle avec des broches de Kirschner et un haubanage (34 %). Le bon résultat de la nouvelle méthode peut s'expliquer par la fixation des implants sur la face médiale du tibia et la non-utilisation de broches de Kirschner.

Symptomatic lumbar stenosis due to low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis can effectively be treated with mere decompression.

PURPOSE: Adding instrumented spondylodesis to decompression in symptomatic spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis is subject of debate. The presence of spondylolisthesis due to degeneration is an indicator of severe facet joint and intervertebral disc degeneration, and this may fit increased instability of the spine. We aim to establish the incidence of degenerative spondylolisthesis in spinal stenosis surgical candidates and to evaluate the incidence of failure of decompressive surgery without concomitant spondylodesis as initial treatment. METHODS: Medical files of all operated patients for spinal stenosis between 2007 and 2013 were evaluated. Demographic characteristics, pre-operative radiological characteristics (level of stenosis, presence, and grade of spondylolisthesis), surgical technique, incidence, and indication for reoperation were summarised, as well as the type of reoperation. Patient satisfaction was classified as 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied' after initial and secondary surgery. The follow-up was 6 to 12 years. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-four patients were included, and 253 (27%) had a spondylolisthesis. Seventeen percent of the spondylolisthesis patients receiving decompression were reoperated versus 12% of the stenosis patients (p=.059). Reoperation in the spondylolisthesis group concerned instrumented spondylodesis in 38 versus 10% in the stenosis group. The satisfaction percentage was comparable in the stenosis and the spondylolisthesis group two months after surgery (80 vs. 74%). Of the 253 spondylolisthesis patients, 1% initially received instrumented spondylodesis and 6% in a second operation. CONCLUSION: Lumbar stenosis with and without (low-grade) degenerative spondylolisthesis can usually effectively be treated with mere decompression. Instrumented surgery in a second surgical procedure does not lead to less satisfaction with surgical outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Full-versus Partial-Thickness Cartilage Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare postoperative patient-reported outcomes and reoperation rates following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) between patients with full-thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) and partial-thickness cartilage loss (PTCL). DESIGN: Multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI, were searched until October 2019 for studies comparing the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society (AKS) score, and reoperation rates between patients with FTCL and PTCL following UKA. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager software. RESULTS: A total of 613 UKA cases from 5 retrospective cohort studies were included. The mean difference in postoperative OKSs was significantly higher by 2.92 in FTCL group than in PTCL group (95% confidence interval [CI] = -5.29 to -0.55; P = 0.02). Improvement in OKS was significantly higher by 2.69 in FTCL group than in PTCL group (95% CI = -4.79 to -0.60; P = 0.01). However, the differences in OKSs were not clinically significant. The mean difference in AKS knee scores was similar between the 2 groups (95% CI = -9.14 to -3.34; P = 0.36), whereas the pooled mean difference in AKS function scores was higher by 5.63 in FTCL group than in PTCL group (95% CI = -9.27 to -1.98; P = 0.002), which was clinically relevant. The reoperation rates were statistically higher in PTCL group than in FTCL group (odds ratio = 2.24; 95% CI = 1.15 to 4.38; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FTCL achieved superior postoperative patient-reported outcomes and lower reoperation rates following UKA compared with those with PTCL. Thus, we believe this procedure should only be applied to end-stage medial osteoarthritis of the knee joint.

Colpocleisis: reoperation risk and risk of uterine and vaginal cancer: A nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to evaluate the risk of reoperation and uterine (myometrial, endometrial, and cervical) and vaginal cancer after colpocleisis performed during the years 1977-2018. Furthermore, we also aimed to assess the development in colpocleisis procedures performed during the study period. METHODS: Danish nationwide registers covering operations, diagnoses, and life events can be linked on an individual level owing to the unique personal numbers of all Danish residents. We performed a nationwide historical cohort study including women born before year 2000 who underwent colpocleisis between 1977 and 2018 (N = 2,228) using the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). We followed the cohort until death/emigration/31 December 2018, whichever came first. Primary outcomes were number of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) operations performed after colpocleisis and uterine and vaginal cancer diagnosed after colpocleisis in a subgroup of women with the uterus in situ. This was assessed with cumulative incidences. RESULTS: During follow-up (median 5.6 years) 6.5% and 8.2% underwent POP surgery within 2 and 10 years after colpocleisis respectively. Within 10 years after colpocleisis 0.5% (N = 8) were diagnosed with uterine or vaginal cancer in the subgroup of women with their uterus (N = 1,970). During the study time 37-80 women underwent colpocleisis yearly and the mean age increased (77.1 to 81.4 years). CONCLUSION: Despite smaller studies showing no recurrence after colpocleisis, we found that 6.5% underwent reoperation within 2 years. Few women were diagnosed with uterine or vaginal cancer after colpocleisis. The increased age at the time of colpocleisis indicates changed attitudes regarding surgical treatment for elderly women with comorbidities.

Is It Necessary to Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction in Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF) is a common procedure for treating patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease. The selection of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) relative to the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of PCF construct terminating at the lower cervical spine and crossing the CTJ. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database. Complications, rate of reoperation, surgical data, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and radiographic outcomes were compared between PCF construct terminating at or above C7 (cervical group) and at or below T1 (thoracic group) in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease. A subgroup analysis based on surgical techniques and indications was performed. RESULTS: Fifteen retrospective cohort studies comprising 2071 patients (1163 in the cervical group and 908 in the thoracic group) were included. The cervical group was associated with a lower incidence of wound-related complications (RR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.92, p = 0.022; 831 patients in cervical group vs. 692 patients in thoracic group), a lower reoperation rate for wound-related complications (RR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96, p = 0.034; 768 vs. 624 patients), and less neck pain at the final follow-up (WMD, -0.58; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.23, p = 0.001; 327 vs. 268 patients). However the cervical group also developed a higher incidence of overall adjacent segment disease (ASD, including distal ASD and proximal ASD) (RR, 1.87; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.76, p = 0.001; 1079 vs. 860 patients), distal ASD (RR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.51, p = 0.001; 642 vs. 555 patients), overall hardware failure (including hardware failure of LIV and hardware failure occurring at other instrumented vertebra) (RR, 1.48; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.15, p = 0.040; 614 vs. 451 patients), and hardware failure of LIV (RR, 1.89; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.95, p = 0.005; 380 vs. 339 patients). The operating time was reasonably shorter (WMD, -43.47; 95% CI -59.42 to -27.52, p < 0.001; 611 vs. 570 patients) and the estimated blood loss was lower (WMD, -143.77; 95% CI -185.90 to -101.63, p < 0.001; 721 vs. 740 patients) when the PCF construct did not cross the CTJ. CONCLUSIONS: PCF construct crossing the CTJ was associated with a lower incidence of ASD and hardware failure but a higher incidence of wound-related complications and a small increase in qualitative neck pain, without difference in neck disability on the NDI. Based on the subgroup analysis for surgical techniques and indications, prophylactic crossing of the CTJ should be considered for patients with concurrent instability, ossification, deformity, or a combination of anterior approach surgeries as well. However, long-term follow-up outcomes and patient selection-related factors such as bone quality, frailty, and nutrition status should be addressed in further studies.

Long-Term Reoperation Rates After Open versus Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: Five Year Follow-Up of 2130 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MISS) is a growing alternative to Open Spine Surgery (OSS). The preservation of musculature and minimization of iatrogenic injury is hypothesized to decrease the need for reoperation by preserving normal anatomy. Our objective is to compare the relative long-term reoperation rates after MISS and OSS for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compares the long-term reoperation rates after MISS and OSS. Eligible patients were adults with a primary lumbar intervention carried out between 5/1/2004 and 1/31/2014 to allow for at least 5 years of follow up. Patients without sufficient descriptive metrics or follow-up data were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of lumbar spine reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 2130 patients met the inclusion criteria-1895 underwent OSS and 235 underwent MISS. On average and across all surgery types (decompression and decompression with fusion), 28% of OSS patients required reoperation during the minimum 5-year follow up period while only 14% of MISS patients required reoperation (P = 0.001). The MISS group was statistically identical to the OSS group in all categories except that the MISS group was on average 1.8 years older (62.25 vs. 60.45, P = 0.039) and had a higher incidence of diabetes (26% vs. 17%, P = 0.000), but had a lower average body mass index than the OSS group (28.35 vs. 29.60, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of degenerative lumbar spine disease, MISS has the potential to reduce the long-term need for reoperation when compared with OSS.

Long-term reoperation rates and causes for reoperations following lumbar microendoscopic discectomy and decompression: 10-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the 10-year rates and causes of reoperations following lumbar microendoscopic discectomy for disc herniation (MEDH) and microendoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis (MEDS), as well as to define the reoperations at index and different lumbar levels. METHODS: Between June 2005 and May 2011, the same surgeon had been using MEDH and/or MEDS on 355 consecutive patients. The follow-up rate was 88.3%. The causes and rates of reoperations (RORs) were determined at 10 years after the initial operations. RESULTS: The 10-year reoperation rate for all patients combined was 22.1% (67/303). The 10-year reoperation rate for all cases that underwent repeat operations in the same segment was 16.5% (50/303); the most frequent reason for reoperation (FRR) was recurrence of disc herniation (ROR, 25/251 = 9.96%), the second FRR was an increase of postoperative spondylolisthesis and/or instability (ROR, 8/303 = 2.64%), and the third FRR was surgical site infection (ROR, 5/303 = 1.65%). Ten-year reoperation rate for all cases that underwent repeat operation at different lumbar levels was 5.61% (17/303); the most FRR was new disc herniation at another lumbar level (ROR, 10/303 = 3.30%), the second FRR was residual segmental stenosis (ROR, 4/303 = 1.32%), and the third FRR was new segmental stenosis at other lumbar levels (ROR, 2/303 = 0.66%). CONCLUSIONS: Three-fourths of all repeat operations were conducted in the same segment and one-fourth were performed at different lumbar levels. We believe that it is important to understand and prevent related problems.

Wear and osteolysis outcomes for highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene: a 15- to 18-year single-centre follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Although highly positive results for wear reduction of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) have been reported around the 10-year follow-up, the long-term result related to reoperation and wear-related survival is still an issue. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the follow-up results of a single manufacture's polyethylene liner for >15 years in terms of survival and wear rate. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 134 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) who were followed up for at least 15 years. The mean age at the time of surgery was 50.7 years (conventional polyethylene [CPE] group = 22; HXLPE group = 112). Linear and volumetric wear rates of polyethylene were measured, and the reoperation rate and radiographic osteolysis were evaluated and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed in both groups. Implant-related complications were also examined. RESULTS: HXLPE group showed a significantly lower wear rate in both linear and volumetric wear. None of the hip radiographs showed evidence of loosening or osteolysis in the HXLPE group. The survival rates at 15- to 18-year follow-up were 90.9% and 95.5% in the CPE and HXLPE groups when all-cause reoperation was the endpoint, and 90.9% and 100.0% when the wear-related reoperation was the endpoint, respectively. Implant-related complications were not different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wear reduction and osteolysis showed a great advantage in HXLPE after a 15-year follow-up. Although the CPE and HXLPE showed excellent survival, wear and osteolysis were more frequent in the CPE; therefore, the high risk of reoperation in the future should be considered.

Can 3D-printing avoid discomfort-related implant removal in midshaft clavicle fractures? A four-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the variation in shape and curvature of the clavicle, plates often have to be adjusted during surgery to acquire a good fit. Poorly fitted plates can cause discomfort, eventually requiring implant removal. 3D-printed replicas of the fractured clavicle can assist in planning of the surgical approach, plate selection and, if necessary, adjustment of the plate prior to surgery. We hypothesized this method of preoperative preparation would reduce implant-related discomfort resulting in a reduced reoperation rate MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, perioperative plate handling and clavicle fixation were timed and follow-up data were collected from participants undergoing operative treatment for a midshaft clavicle fracture. The control group (n = 7) received conventional surgery with standard precontoured plates. For the intervention group (n = 7), 3D-printed replicas of the fractured clavicle and a mirrored version of the healthy contralateral clavicle were available prior to surgery for planning of the surgical approach, and for plate selection and contouring. Primary outcome was reoperation rate due to implant-related discomfort. Secondary outcomes were complications and time differences in the different surgical phases (reduction, fixation and overall operation time) RESULTS: More participants in the control group had the plate removed due to discomfort compared to the intervention group (5/7 vs. 0/6; P = 0.012). One participant was excluded from the intervention group due to a postoperative complication; an infection occurred at the implant site. No relevant time difference in surgical plate handling was found between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative preparation using 3D-printed replicas of the clavicle fracture may reduce implant removal caused by plated-related discomfort. No relevant effect on surgery time was found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with 'toetsingonline.nl', trial number NL51269.075/14, 17-02-2015.

Surgical treatment for complete atrioventricular septal defect in patients above the optimal age / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Objective    To summarize the clinical outcomes and experience of surgical treatment for patients with complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) above the optimal age for surgery. Methods    We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 163 simple type CAVSD patients less than 7 years who underwent operations in Fuwai Hospital from 2002 to 2013. The patients were divided into a normal group (n=84, including 37 males and 16 females with an average age of 7.6±2.7 months) and an over-age group (n=79, including 30 males and 49 females with an average age of 34.6±19.6 months) according to whether the age was more than 1 year. Results    The average aortic cross clamp time (88.3±24.4 min vs. 106.1±35.4 min, P<0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (123.6±31.1 min vs. 142.6±47.1 min, P=0.003) were statistically different between the two groups. During the follow-up period (the normal group 53.3±43.9 months, the over-age group 57.2±48.2 months), there was no statistical difference in all-cause mortality (10.7% vs. 8.9%, P=0.691), the incidence of moderate or severe left atrioventricular valve regurgitation (16.7% vs. 21.5%, P=0.430) and reintervention rate (3.6% vs. 0.0%, P=0.266) between the two groups. No left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and complete atrioventricular block occurred in both groups. Conclusion    For CAVSD children above the optimal age, rational surgical treatments can also achieve satisfying results.

Reoperation Rate and Indication for Reoperation after Free Functional Muscle Transfers in Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury.

BACKGROUND: Free functional gracilis muscle transfers (FFGT) are an option for reconstruction after traumatic brachial plexus injury. Few studies report the rate of revision surgeries following free functional muscle transfers. We examined the reoperation rate and indication for reoperation after primary reconstruction of upper extremity function with a free gracilis transfer after brachial plexus injury. METHODS: From 2003-2016, we identified 25 patients who underwent a free functional gracilis muscle transfer for restoration of upper extremity function. We reviewed their medical charts to record patient, injury, and treatment characteristics. Indication for reoperation and reoperative procedure were also identified. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 25 patients (56%) had a reoperation after FFGT. Four flaps were re-explored for vascular compromise, but there were no flap failures. The majority of reoperations involved adjustment of tendon excursion (8/14) which demonstrated that tenolysis was the main procedure. CONCLUSION: Despite promising results of free functional gracilis transfers, reoperation is relatively common and should be discussed with the patient as a preoperative strategy. Early exploration of vascular compromise may decrease the flap failure. Poor tendon excursion is a common unpredicted consequence after FFMT and is the main indication for reoperation.

Reoperation, Readmission, and Discharge Disposition for Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Pathology Treated With Either Open or Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Single-Center Retrospective Review of 1435 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Spine surgery has been transformed by the growth of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures. Previous studies agree that MIS has shorter hospitalization and faster recovery time when compared to conventional open surgery. However, the reoperation and readmission rates between the 2 techniques have yet to be well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of subsequent revision between MIS and open techniques for degenerative lumbar pathology. METHODS: A total of 1435 adult patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery between 2013 and 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. The rates of need for subsequent reoperation, 30- and 90-d readmission, and discharge to rehabilitation were recorded for both MIS and traditional open techniques. Groups were divided into decompression alone and decompression with fusion. RESULTS: The rates of subsequent reoperation following MIS and open surgery were 10.4% and 12.2%, respectively (P = .32), which were maintained when subdivided into decompression and decompression with fusion. MIS and open 30-d readmission rates were 7.9% and 7.2% (P = .67), while 90-d readmission rates were 4.3% and 3.6% (P = .57), respectively. Discharge to rehabilitation was significantly lower for patients under 60 yr of age undergoing MIS (1.64% vs 5.63%, P = .04). CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of lumbar spine pathology does not result in increased reoperation or 30- and 90-d readmission rates when compared to open approaches. Patients under the age of 60 yr undergoing MIS procedures were less likely to be discharged to rehab.

The rise of quality indicators in neurosurgery: 30-day unplanned reoperation rate evaluated in 3760 patients-a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Quality indicators are emerging as tools to evaluate health care outcomes. Few studies have evaluated indicators suitable for neurosurgery so far. Among others, reoperation rate has been suggested as a possible indicator. We aimed to evaluate the reoperation rate in a large neurosurgery adult collective. METHODS: In this exploratory post hoc analysis, we evaluated all patients operated in our service for elective and emergency surgery between January 2014 and May 2016. Planned and unplanned reoperations were filtered and a quantitative analysis, including uni- and multivariate analyses, was performed. RESULTS: A total of 3760 patients were included in this evaluation. From 378 reoperated patients within 30 days (10.1%), 51 underwent planned procedures (1.4%). Three hundred twenty-seven patients (8.7%) represented the analyzed collective of patients having undergone unplanned surgical procedures, causing a total of 409 from 4268 additional procedures (9.6%). Early unplanned 7-day reoperation rate was 4.5% (n = 193), occurring in 4.5% of patients (n = 193). Postoperative hemorrhage (n = 107, 26.2%) and external ventricle drainage-associated infections or dislocation (n = 105, 25.7 %) were the most common indication for unplanned surgery. CONCLUSION: Unplanned re-operation rate of a neurosurgical service can help to internally evaluate health care outcome and improve quality of care. Benchmarking with this indicator however is not recommendable as results can vary distinctly due to the heterogenic patient collective of each institution. We expect unplanned reoperation rates to be higher in large university hospitals and tertiary centers with complex cases, as compared to center with less complex cases treating patients with lower morbidity. In this study, we deliver an authentic portrait of a large neurosurgical center in Germany.

Comparison of seven surgical interventions for lumbar disc Herniation: A network meta-analysis / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: With the rapid development of intervertebral disc interventional technology, surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation has made great progress, but at the same time, surgeons and patients have more choices. Therefore, it is particularly important to compare the efficacy and safety of new surgical methods and traditional widely accepted treatment methods. Traditional meta-analysis cannot classify the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical methods. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of seven surgical interventions for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation using network meta-analysis. METHODS: We performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare seven surgical interventions for people with lumbar disc herniation, including percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, standard open discectomy, standard open microsurgical discectomy, chemonucleolysis, microendoscopic discectomy, percutaneous laser disc decompression, and automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. The eligible randomized controlled trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase and Google scholar. Data from three outcomes (success rate, complication rate, and reoperation rate) were independently extracted by two assessors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) A total of 29 randomized controlled trials (31 literatures) including 3 146 participants were finally included into this article. (2) Our Meta-analysis provides hierarchies of these seven interventions. For the success rate, the rank probability is as follows (from best to worst): Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > standard open discectomy > standard open microsurgical discectomy > chemonucleolysis > microendoscopic discectomy > percutaneous laser disc decompression > automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. (3) For the complication rate, the rank probability is as follows (from best to worst): Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > standard open microsurgical discectomy > standard open discectomy > microendoscopic discectomy > percutaneous laser disc decompression > chemonucleolysis > automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. (4) For the reoperation rate, the rank probability is as follows (from best to worst): Standard open microsurgical discectomy > standard open discectomy > microendoscopic discectomy > percutaneous laser disc decompression > percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > chemonucleolysis > automated percutaneous lumber discectomy. (5) This meta-analysis provides evidence that percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy might be the best choice to increase the success rate and decrease the complication rate. Moreover, standard open microsurgical discectomy might be the best option to drop the reoperation rate. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy might lead to the lowest success rate and the highest complication rate. It is hoped that one-to-one randomized controlled trials of high quality will further validate the results of this study.

Long-term outcome of lacrimal stent intubation for complete acquired lacrimal drainage obstructions.

PURPOSE: To investigate long-term outcome and report reoperation rate of non-infected, complete acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction (ALDO) treated with canaliculodacryocystoplasty (CDCP) depending on site of stenosis. METHOD: Consecutive adult patients with non-infected, complete ALDO treated with CDCP were followed for 76 months. Location of stenosis at preoperative visit and intraoperative probing was recorded, and during follow-up, recurrence of stenosis prompting additional surgery and complications were noted. Survival analysis was applied to compare reoperation rate depending on site of stenosis. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to patients not requiring reoperation asking to grade current epiphora problems. RESULTS: Among 85 included cases (71 patients), 57 were classified as canalicular stenosis and 28 as nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) preoperatively. At the end of follow-up, 39% (33/85) of cases had required additional surgery due to persistent/recurrent symptoms. No statistical difference was found between these groups. During CDCP, 25 of the 57 preoperatively classified canalicular stenosis were found to have an additional obstruction below the sac. The group with only canalicular stenosis had a statistically significant higher survival compared with cases with NLDO or multiple obstructions (p = 0.03). Of patients responding to the follow-up questionnaire, 11/37 cases experienced epiphora often or constant. CONCLUSION: Treating complete NLDO with CDCP results in a high reoperation rate and seems an insufficient alternative. Canaliculodacryocystoplasty (CDCP) may be discussed if preoperative examination indicates canalicular stenosis and dacryocystorhinostomy is not desirable. However, the patient needs to be aware of the higher risk for additional surgery, especially if a second stenosis is found during probing.