A Comparison of Rosuvastatin Monotherapy and Rosuvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Combination Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic condition where vascular inflammation and oxidative stress contribute to disease progression and associated complications. Although statins are recommended for managing dyslipidemia in diabetes, additional therapies are often required to achieve target lipid levels. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rosuvastatin monotherapy versus combination therapy with ezetimibe in patients with type 2 diabetes. A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases until April 2024, identifying six randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that the rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe combination resulted in significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol (mean difference, or MD: 19.49; 95% CI: 13.99 to 24.99), triglycerides (MD: 13.44; 95% CI: 2.04 to 24.85), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: -17.68; 95% CI: 12.85 to 22.51) compared to rosuvastatin monotherapy. Conversely, rosuvastatin monotherapy achieved a greater reduction in HbA1c levels (MD: -0.11; 95% CI: -0.17 to -0.04). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that using the same dose of rosuvastatin in both groups led to more significant improvements in lipid parameters with lower heterogeneity. The findings suggest that the rosuvastatin-ezetimibe combination may be a more effective lipid-lowering strategy for patients with type 2 diabetes, though larger studies are needed to assess long-term safety and optimal dosing. Additionally, while rosuvastatin monotherapy provided modest HbA1c reductions, the clinical relevance remains uncertain, and potential risks with high-dose statins should be considered.

Equisetin protects from atherosclerosis in vivo by binding to STAT3 and inhibiting its activity.

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory vascular disease characterized by lipid metabolism disorder and lipid accumulation. Equisetin (EQST) is a hemiterpene compound isolated from fungus of marine sponge origin, which has antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, lipid-lowering, and weight loss effects. Whether EQST has anti-atherosclerotic activity has not been reported. In this study, we revealed that EQST displayed anti- atherosclerosis effects through inhibiting macrophage inflammatory response, lipid uptake and foam cell formation in vitro, and finally ameliorated high-fat diet (HFD)-induced atherosclerosis in AopE-/- mice in vivo. Mechanistically, EQST directly bound to STAT3 with high-affinity by forming hydrophobic bonds at GLN247 and GLN326 residues, as well as hydrogen bonds at ARG325 and THR346 residues. EQST interacted with STAT3 physically, and functionally inhibited the transcription activity of STAT3, thereby regulating atherosclerosis. Therefore, these results supports EQST as a candidate for developing anti-atherosclerosis therapeutic agent.

Differential Adherence to Free and Single-Pill Combination of Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe: Findings from a Real-World Analysis in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to cardiovascular drug treatment can significantly benefit from a reduced pill burden, but data on this matter derived from real-life settings are currently scanty. This analysis assessed the possible changes in adherence in patients treated with rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (ROS/EZE) as free multi-pill combination who switched to ROS/EZE as single-pill combination in the setting of real clinical practice in Italy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the administrative databases for a catchment area of about seven million health-assisted residents. Adults receiving ROS/EZE as a single-pill combination from January 2010 to June 2020 (followed up to 2021) were identified. The date of the first prescription of single-pill combination of ROS/EZE was considered as the index date. The analysis included the users of ROS/EZE as a free combination during the year before the index date. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected during the period of data availability prior to the index date. Adherence to therapy was evaluated as proportion of days covered (PDC), namely the percentage of days during which a patient had access to medication, in the 12-month interval preceding or following the index date (PDC < 25% non-adherence; PDC = 25-75% partial adherence; PDC > 75% adherence). RESULTS: A total of 1219 patients (61.1% male, aged 66.2 ± 10.4 years) were included. Cardiovascular comorbidities were found in 83.3% of them, diabetes in 26.4%, and a combination of both in 16.2%. Single-pill combination of ROS/EZE was associated with a higher proportion of adherent patients compared to free-pill combination (75.2% vs 51.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis suggested that switching from a regimen based on separate pills to one based on a single-pill combination resulted in improved adherence to ROS/EZE therapy.

Lipid-lowering therapy to control low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels is essential for cardiovascular risk prevention. Successful therapy depends on the type of lipid-lowering therapy, i.e., low or high statin intensity and combination of statins with ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and adherence to therapy, i.e., whether the patient actually takes their pills as prescribed. If there are fewer pills to be taken, this can help patients to follow their treatment. Single-pill combinations of two drugs could facilitate adherence and thus the chances of reaching the recommended lipid targets. Here, we analyzed a sample of Italian patients with dyslipidemia to examine whether the switch from a free combination of two separate pills of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe to a single-pill combination of the same drugs could improve adherence to therapy. We found that the proportion of adherent patients increased from about just over half (51.8%) to about three-fourths (75.1%) when switching from two-pill to single-pill combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe. These findings suggest that simplifying therapy can help improve patient adherence, which is essential for reaching lipid targets and ultimately for alleviating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between the Fixed-Dose Combination of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10/20 Mg and the Fixed-Dose Combination of Telmisartan/Amlodipine 80/5 Mg in Healthy Subjects.

Background: Management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, which are common comorbid risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, require multiple medications. The development of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) containing ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine aims to enhance patient adherence and persistence, but the potential interactions among the four medications have not been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the FDC of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg (ER) and the FDC of telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg (TA). Methods: An open-label, single-sequence, three-period, three-treatment crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. All subjects received ER for 7 days, TA for 9 days and ER combined with TA for 7 days during each treatment period. For PK analysis of total/free ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine, serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours at steady state. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study. Results: Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled, and 34 subjects completed the study. The systemic exposure to each active ingredient after coadministration of the two FDCs was similar to that after each FDC alone. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for the maximum plasma concentration (µg/L) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (h·µg/L) of the combination therapy to monotherapy, assessed at steady state, were as follows: total ezetimibe, 1.0264 (0.8765-1.2017) and 0.9359 (0.7847-1.1163); free ezetimibe, 1.5713 (1.2821-1.9257) and 0.9941 (0.8384-1.1788); rosuvastatin, 2.1673 (1.7807-2.6379) and 1.1714 (0.9992-1.3733); telmisartan, 1.0745 (0.8139-1.4186) and 1.1057 (0.8379-1.4591); and amlodipine, 0.9421 (0.8764-1.0126) and 0.9603 (0.8862-1.0405). Both combination therapy and monotherapy were well tolerated by the subjects. Conclusion: The coadministration of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg and ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg was well tolerated in healthy subjects, and the PK interaction between those two FDCs was not clinically significant.

Graft protective effects and donor-specific antibody suppression by CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell induced by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor rosuvastatin in a murine heart transplant model.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that the hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statins) play an important role in the regulation of alloimmune responses. However, little is known regarding the effects of statin on allograft protection or donor-specific antibodies (DSA). In this study, we investigated the graft-protective and immunomodulatory effects of rosuvastatin in a model of fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched murine cardiac allograft transplantation. METHODS: CBA mice underwent transplantation of C57BL/6 (B6) hearts and received 50 and 500 µg/kg/day of rosuvastatin from the day of transplantation until seven days after the completion of transplantation. To confirm the requirement for regulatory T cells (Tregs), we administered an anti-interleukin-2 receptor alpha antibody (PC-61) to rosuvastatin-treated CBA recipients. Additionally, histological and fluorescent staining, cell proliferation analysis, flow cytometry, and DSA measurements were performed. RESULTS: CBA recipients with no treatment rejected B6 cardiac graft acutely (median survival time [MST], 7 days). CBA mice treated with 500 µg/kg/day of rosuvastatin prolonged allograft survival (MSTs, 77 days). Fluorescent staining studies showed that rosuvastatin-treated recipients had strong aggregation of CD4+Foxp3+ cells in the myocardium and around the coronary arteries of cardiac allografts two weeks after grafting. Flow cytometry studies performed two weeks after transplantation showed an increased number of splenic CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells in rosuvastatin-treated recipients. The addition of rosuvastatin to mixed leukocyte cultures suppressed cell proliferation by increasing the number of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs. Additionally, Tregs suppressed DSA production in rosuvastatin-treated recipients. CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin treatment may be a complementary graft-protective strategy for suppressing DSA production in the acute phase, driven by the promotion of splenic and graft-infiltrating CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs.

The beneficial effects of Rosuvastatin in inhibiting inflammation in sepsis.

Microbial infection-induced sepsis causes excessive inflammatory response and multiple organ failure. An effective strategy for the treatment of sepsis-related syndromes is still needed. Rosuvastatin, a typical ß-hydroxy ß-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor licensed for reducing the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hyperlipidemia, has displayed anti-inflammatory capacity in different types of organs and tissues. However, its effects on the development of sepsis are less reported. Here, we found that the administration of Rosuvastatin reduced the mortality of sepsis mice and prevented body temperature loss. Additionally, it inhibited the production of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), and migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in peritoneal lavage supernatants of animals. The increased number of mononuclear cells in the peritoneum of sepsis mice was reduced by Rosuvastatin. Interestingly, it ameliorated lung inflammation and improved the hepatic and renal function in the sepsis animals. Further in vitro experiments show that Rosuvastatin inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced production of proinflammatory cytokines in RAW 264.7 macrophages by preventing the activation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB). Our findings demonstrate that the administration of Rosuvastatin hampered organ dysfunction and mitigated inflammation in a relevant model of sepsis.

PLGA and PDMS-based in situ forming implants loaded with rosuvastatin and copper-selenium nanoparticles: a promising dual-effect formulation with augmented antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity in breast cancer cells.

Breast cancer is among the most prevalent tumors worldwide. In this study, in-situ forming implants (ISFIs) containing rosuvastatin calcium were prepared using three types of poly (D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), namely, PLGA 50/50 with ester terminal and PLGA 75/25 with ester or acid terminal. Additionally, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was added in concentrations of 0, 10, 20, and 30% w/v to accelerate matrix formation. The prepared ISFIs were characterized for their rheological behaviors, rate of matrix formation, and in-vitro drug release. All the prepared formulations revealed a Newtonian flow with a matrix formation rate between 0.017 and 0.059 mm/min. Generally, increasing the concentration of PDMS increased the matrix formation rate. The prepared implants' release efficiency values ranged between 46.39 and 89.75%. The ISFI containing PLGA 50/50 with 30% PDMS was selected for further testing, as it has the highest matrix formation rate and a promising release efficiency value. Copper-selenium nanoparticles were prepared with two different particle sizes (560 and 383 nm for CS1 and CS2, respectively) and loaded into the selected formulation to enhance its anticancer activity. The unloaded and loaded implants with rosuvastatin and copper-selenium nanoparticles were evaluated for their antibacterial activity, against Gram-positive and negative microorganisms, and anticancer efficacy, against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. The results confirmed the potency of rosuvastatin calcium against cancer cells and the synergistic effect when loaded with smaller particle sizes of copper-selenium nanoparticles. This formulation holds a considerable potential for efficient breast cancer therapy.

Rosuvastatin attenuates total-tau serum levels and increases expression of miR-124-3p in dyslipidemic Alzheimer's patients: a historic cohort study.

microRNAs are candidate diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. This study aimed to compare Silymarin with Rosuvastatin and placebo on total-Tau protein level and expression levels of microRNAs and TGF-ß and COX-2 in Alzheimer's patients with secondary dyslipidemia. 36 mild AD patients with dyslipidemia were divided into three groups of 12. The first group received silymarin (140mg), the second group received placebo (140mg), and the third group recieved Rosuvastatin (10mg). Tablets were administered three times a day for Six months. The blood samples of the patients were collected before and after the intervention and the serum was separated. Using the RT-qPCR method, the expression levels of miR-124-3p and miR-125b-5p were assessed, and the serum levels of total-Tau, TGF-ß, and COX-2 enzyme were measured using the ELISA method. Data were analyzed with SPSS software. In this study, the level of Δtotal-Tau was significantly lower in the Rosuvastatin group compared to the placebo (P = 0.038). Also, a significant reduction in the level of ΔTGF-ß was observed in the Silymarin to Rosuvastatin group (p = 0.046) and ΔmiR-124-3p was significantly increased in the Rosuvastatin compared to the placebo group (p = 0.044). Rosuvastatin outperformed silymarin in decreasing Δtotal-Tau serum levels and enhancing expression of ΔmiR-124-3p, attributed to Rosuvastatin's capacity to lower cholesterol levels and inflammation concurrently. Conversely, silymarin was more effective than Rosuvastatin in reducing levels of ΔTGF-ß. Serum miR-124-3p could serve as a promising diagnostic biomarker and a new therapeutic focus in AD.

Rosuvastatin: A Potential Therapeutic Agent for Inhibition of Mechanical Pressure-Induced Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Background: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) underlies the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases of the spine; however, its exact molecular mechanism is unclear. Purpose: To explore the molecular mechanism of mechanical pressure (MP)-induced IDD and to assess the role and mechanism of Rosuvastatin (RSV) inhibits MP-induced IDD. Methods: SD rat nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) were cultured in vitro and an apoptosis model of NPCs was constructed using MP. Proliferative activity, reactive oxygen species content, apoptosis, and wound healing were detected in each group of NPCs, respectively. The expression of relevant proteins was detected by qPCR and Western Blot techniques. 18 SD rats were randomly divided into control, pressure and RSV groups. Elisa, qPCR, Western Blot and immunohistochemical staining techniques were used to detect changes in the content of related proteins in the intervertebral discs of each group. HE staining and Modified Saffron-O and Fast Green Stain Kit were used to assess IDD in each group. Results: MP treatment at 1.0 MPa could significantly induce apoptosis of NPCs after 24 h. MP could significantly inhibit the proliferative activity and wound healing ability of NPCs, and increase the intracellular reactive oxygen species content and apoptosis rate; pretreatment with RSV could significantly activate the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway and reverse the cellular damage caused by MP; when inhibit the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway activation, the protective effect of RSV was reversed. In vivo MP could significantly increase the content of inflammatory factors within the IVD and promote the degradation of extracellular matrix, leading to IDD. When the intervention of RSV was employed, it could significantly activate the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway and improve the above results. Conclusion: RSV may inhibit MP-induced NPCs damage and IDD by activating the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.

Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of 1.2% Rosuvastatin Hydrogel as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planing in Generalized Chronic Periodontitis.

Background Periodontitis, characterized by chronic inflammation and tissue destruction, remains a significant public health concern. Conventional treatment like scaling and root planing (SRP) is effective but often augmented with adjunctive therapies to improve outcomes. Local drug delivery (LDD) systems containing pharmacological agents offer targeted treatment with reduced systemic side effects. Rosuvastatin (RSV), known for its anti-inflammatory and tissue regenerative properties, has shown promise in periodontal therapy. This prospective clinical trial assessed the effectiveness of 1.2% RSV hydrogel as an adjunct to SRP in managing generalized chronic periodontitis. Methods Thirty patients were grouped into Group A (SRP alone) and Group B (SRP + 1.2% RSV hydrogel). Clinical measurements, such as the modified sulcular bleeding index (mSBI), probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL), were documented both at the beginning of the study and after three months. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Participants in Group B showed significant improvements in mSBI (from 2.34 ± 0.59 to 1.01 ± 0.29), PPD (from 7.36 ± 1.12 mm to 4.63 ± 0.88 mm), and CAL (from 8.56 ± 1.22 mm to 5.90 ± 1.24 mm) compared to Group A at the three-month follow-up. The mean values of these parameters decreased significantly in both groups from baseline to three months. However, the reductions were more substantial in Group B, indicating the beneficial effect of RSV hydrogel adjunctive therapy. Conclusion The study demonstrates the efficacy of 1.2% RSV hydrogel employed as a localized drug in enhancing the outcomes of SRP for generalized chronic periodontitis. The adjunctive use of RSV hydrogel led to noteworthy enhancements in clinical parameters, highlighting its potential in periodontal therapy.

Evaluation of microwave irradiated Polyacrylamide grafted Opuntia leaf mucilage graft copolymer (OPM-g-PAM) as effective controlled release polymer for release of Rosuvastastin as model drug.

Controlled drug delivery systems offer numerous advantages. This research evaluates Opuntia leaf mucilage grafted with polyacrylamide (OPM-g-PAM) as a promising controlled-release polymer. PAM chains were grafted onto the backbone of OPM using a microwave-assisted method. Optimization of the best grade was based on % grafting efficiency and intrinsic viscosity, followed by extensive physical and analytical characterizations. Analytical characterizations revealed semicrystalline nature of the biomaterial. SEM and AFM observations revealed rough and porous surfaces, indicating effective grafting. Swelling behavior showed maximum sensitivity at pH 7, with reduced swelling at higher sodium chloride concentrations. A comparative study of % drug release of Rosuvastatin over 24 h showed that the optimized grade controlled drug release effectively, achieving 78.5 % release compared to 98.8 % for GF-3. The release data fitted the Korsmeyer-Peppas model, with an "n" value of 0.8334, indicating non-Fickian (anomalous) diffusion. Bacterial biodegradability studies confirmed the high biodegradability of the graft copolymer. In vitro acute toxicity tests showed no toxicity, as confirmed by histopathological studies of heart, liver, and kidney. Overall, the results indicate that OPM-g-PAM is a highly promising material for use in drug delivery systems, demonstrating potential as a novel controlled-release polymer.

Remission induced by renal protective therapy in nephrotic syndrome with thin basement membrane in an older patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Adult nephrotic syndrome is a well-known kidney disease that causes heavy proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, hypercholesterolemia, edema, and hypertension. The treatment varies according to its underlying cause but often faces medication resistance or adverse drug effects. CASE PRESENTATION: A Japanese woman in her 80s presented with nephrotic syndrome after a 3 year latent period of urinary protein and occult blood. She did not have any secondary causes of nephrotic syndrome. Renal biopsy revealed thin glomerular basement membrane, partial foot process fusion on electron microscopy with minor glomerular change on light microscopy, and slight coarse immunoglobulin M deposition in the mesangium on immunofluorescence microscopy, which was inconsistent with any other glomerular diseases. Without steroid treatment, she dramatically remitted from proteinuria after the administration of the renal protective agents enalapril, ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, and dapagliflozin. Recurrence after 8 months of follow-up subsided with the administration of additional doses of the agents. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrated the novel outcomes of combining medical treatment without steroid use for nephrotic syndrome with thin glomerular basement membrane disease. At the time of writing this report, the patient's renal function was stable and she was free of edema, although moderate proteinuria and occult hematuria persisted. The final diagnosis was uncertain because of the lack of genetic investigation; however, the response to the aforementioned medical treatment suggests the effectiveness of the supportive therapy.

Statins As Anti-Hypertensive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hypertension is the most prevalent condition in clinical practice. Hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolaemia are major contributing factors to cardiovascular diseases. They commonly coexist in a single patient. Statins have been used as prominent medicines for the reduction of cardiovascular events. Statins have been shown to reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension and have lipid-lowering properties in recent articles. Statins reduce blood pressure because of their impact on endothelial function, their interactions with the renin-angiotensin system, and their influence on major artery compliance. This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness and efficacy of statins for managing hypertension in patients with hypertension. Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials, systematic trials, and cohort studies were retrieved using keywords on statins and their use in patients with hypertension. Exclusion criteria included studies that were not in the English language, studies that did not include patients on statins with hypertension, studies that did not provide enough information, technical reports, opinions, or editorials, and studies involving patients < 18 years old. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, adult patients aged > 18 years old, and studies that were freely available or through institutional login. This meta-analysis scrutinized 9361 randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, of which 32 articles including 25 randomized controlled trials and seven meta-analyses were included in the final analysis. This meta-analysis of the role of statins in hypertensive patients aimed to determine the outcome of hypertension control along with antihypertensive medication. Our study showed that statins are useful in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We used a heterogeneous model for analysis due to variations in the study characteristics. The I2 value was 0.33 (0.76, 0.10) for systolic blood pressure and 0/88 (0.86, 0.90) for diastolic blood pressure. The I2 value for the seven meta-analyses included in the study was 1.79 (2.88, 0.69).

Use of Statin and Target Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol attainment among post-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal.

BACKGROUND: and objective: Lipid-lowering is an important intervention to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the secondary prevention of STEMI. There is no study to analyze the use of statin and LDL-C treatment target attainment among STEMI patients in Nepal. This study aims to assess the use of statin and LDL-C treatment target attainment among STEMI patients. METHODS: It was a prospective observational single-center study conducted at the Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal outpatient department. An outpatient department-based survey was conducted among STEMI patients who have lipid profile levels at the time of admission for STEMI and after 4-13 weeks of the index event. Lipid profile levels, diagnosis, and risk factors were collected during the outpatient follow-up. RESULTS: Our study included 280 post-STEMI patients; the mean age was 57.5±11.7 years with the majority being male. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.7 ± 0.1 weeks. Rosuvastatin was the preferred statin with 82.1%. The most common dose of statin used was Rosuvastatin 20mg (70%), followed by Atorvastatin 40mg (12.5%). LDL-C levels of <1.4mmol/l were achieved in 44.6% of cases and LDL levels of <1.8mmol/l in 71.8% of cases. In 36.8% of the study population, there was a greater than 50% decline in LDL-C levels. Diabetic patients (55.1% and 83.1%) only have the significant achievement of LDL goal of both <1.4mmol/l and <1.8mmol/l respectively, when compared to those without diabetes (44.9% and 16.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the post-STEMI patients were treated with high doses of statins and achieved the target LDL-C levels.

Efficacy and safety of topical rosuvastatin & melatonin vs. placebo in patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis: A preliminary randomized double-blinded clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Considering the pathogenesis of psoriasis and also the anti-oxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory properties of rosuvastatin and melatonin, the current clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical rosuvastatin and melatonin in patients with mild to moderate psoriasis. METHODS: The current randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted using a 3-arm parallel group included 77 adult patients (≥18 years old) with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. Patients were randomized into a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups to receive one of the three interventions: melatonin cream, 5.0% (w/w), rosuvastatin cream, 5.0% (w/w), or placebo cream with a similar transparent appearance twice a day for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was severity of the disease using Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). The secondary outcomes included the Dermatological Sum Score (DSS) to assess the erythema, scaling, and plaque elevation and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Photographs of the lesions were also taken at the baseline and at different periodic intervals thereafter. RESULTS: Among 77 randomized patients, 52 (mean (SD) age, 40.67 (10.85) years; 22 (42.30%) men) completed the study. A significant reduction of 45% (mean (SD) of 2.67 (0.98) to 1.74 (1.12)) and 70% (mean (SD) of 2.67 (0.98) to 1.31 (1.13)) in PASI score, and 46% (mean (SD) of 2.91(1.85) to 1.57 (1.11)) and 77% (mean (SD) of 2.91 (1.85) to 0.87 (0.67)) in DSS score on days 30 and 60 with rosuvastatin cream, 5% w/w (P < 0.001) compared with baseline was observed, respectively. Also a significant decrease of 35% (mean (SD) of 2.67 (0.98) to 1.74 (1.12)) and 51% (mean (SD) of 2.67 (0.98) to 1.31 (1.13)) in PASI score, and 40% (mean (SD) of 5.00 (1.58) to 3.00 (1.76))and 61% (mean (SD) of 5.00 (1.58) to 1.92 (1.71)) in DSS score on days 30 and 60 with melatonin cream, 5% w/w (P < 0.001) compared with baseline were observed, respectively. In each of the melatonin or rosuvastatin groups, DLQI improved significantly on days 30 (P < 0.0001) and 60 (P < 0.001) while the changes in the control group were not significant. CONCLUSION: The results of this clinical trial demonstrated that topical melatonin and rosuvastatin diminished the severity of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis with a satisfactory safety profile. Future clinical trials should assess both the long-term efficacy and safety of melatonin and rosuvastatin creams in larger study populations.

Efficacy of single high-dose statin prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impacts of single high-dose statin preloading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been fully examined. This study aims to evaluate post-procedure impacts of single high-dose statin pretreatment with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: The meta-analysis reviewed Cochrane, PubMed, and Medline databases for studies comparing single high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin to placebo in ACS patients undergoing PCI. The primary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at three months. Secondary endpoints examined were the TIMI flow grade 3 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RESULTS: Comprehensive analysis was conducted on fifteen RCTs, encompassing a total of 6,207 patients (3090 vs 3117 patients). The pooled results demonstrated that a single high-dose of statin administered prior to PCI led to a significant decrease in the incidence of MACE at three months post-PCI compared to the control group (OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.35-0.71, p = 0.0001). The occurrence of MI (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.42-0.77, p = 0.0002), all-cause mortality (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.39-0.81, p = 0.0002), and TVR (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.35-0.92, p = 0.02) was significantly lower in the statin single high-dose group compared to the control group. No significant effects on TIMI flow grade 3 (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.94-1.53, p = 0.14) or left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 2.19, 95%CI - 0.97 to 5.34, p = 0.17) were observed. Subgroup analysis demonstrated reduced incidence of MACE with a single dose of 80 mg atorvastatin (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.54-0.81, p < 0.0001) and 40 mg rosuvastatin (OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.07-0.54, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Single high-dose statin before PCI in patients with ACS significantly reduces MACE, MI, all-cause mortality, and TVR three months post-PCI.

Rosuvastatin-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for the Control of LDL Cholesterol in Patients at High Vascular Risk.

Vascular diseases are the leading cause of death in Spain. Hypercholesterolemia is not only a cardiovascular risk factor, but also underlies the etiopathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Therefore, reducing LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) to the goals recommended by clinical practice guidelines, is essential to decrease the risk of vascular complications. Despite this, current LDL-C control is scarce, even in subjects with high and very high risk. This is mainly due to an insufficient intensification of lipid-lowering treatment. In this context, it is essential to prescribe the appropriate therapy, adjusted to patient's needs based on their LDL-C and their vascular risk. Rosuvastatin, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, provides intensive LDL-C reductions (up to 50-55% and 60-75%, respectively), with a low risk of side effects and in an efficient manner, in patients both without and with established atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The effect of rosuvastatin alone or in combination with fenofibrate or omega-3 fatty acids on lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Introduction: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a strong, genetically determined, pathogenetic factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to compare the effect of hypolipidemic treatment on Lp(a) levels of patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Material and methods: We previously randomized patients with mixed hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL-C] > 160 mg/dl and triglycerides > 200 mg/dl) to rosuvastatin monotherapy 40 mg/day (R group, n = 30) or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day combined with fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF group, n = 30) or omega-3 fatty acids 2 g/day (RΩ group, n = 30). In the present post-hoc analysis, we included only the patients whose Lp(a) levels were assessed (16, 16 and 15 in the R, RF and RΩ groups, respectively). Lipid profile and Lp(a) were measured at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Results: Significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and triglyceride levels were observed in all groups. A significant increase in Lp(a) levels was noted in the R (p = 0.017) and RF (p = 0.029) groups, while no significant difference was seen in the RΩ group (p = NS). Regarding Lp(a) elevations, no differences were found between groups. In the R group, a strong negative correlation between the changes in Lp(a) and LDL-C (r = -0.500, p = 0.049) was observed, while a significant negative correlation between the changes in Lp(a) and triglycerides (r = -0.531, p = 0.034) was noted in the RF group. Conclusions: Rosuvastatin and/or fenofibrate treatment increases Lp(a) levels in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Novel therapies should target Lp(a) level reduction to decrease the residual ASCVD risk in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.