Retinal Detachment Associated With Giant Retinal Tears: Surgical Management and Outcomes in the Past 2 Decades.

Purpose: To describe the surgical outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) associated with giant retinal tears (GRTs) and define factors associated with primary anatomic failure. Methods: This retrospective consecutive study comprised primary GRT-RRD surgeries between 1999 and 2021 at a single institution. Exclusion criteria were a follow-up of less than 3 months and incomplete surgical data. Results: The series included 69 eyes (64 patients). Single-surgery anatomic success (SSAS) was achieved in 75% and final anatomic success (FAS) in 90%. The mean logMAR visual acuity improved from 1.5 ± 1.1 to 0.6 ± 0.9. Preoperative factors significantly associated with redetachment were proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (odds ratio [OR], 6.2; P < .01), hypotony (OR, 13.6; P < .01), and a 180-degree or larger GRT (OR, 3.3; P = .04). All cases were treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and perfluoro-N-octane (PFCL). Perfluoropropane (C3F8) was used in 59% and silicone oil in 41%; the redetachment rate was significantly lower in gas cases (15% vs 39%) (P = .02). An encircling band, placed in 84% eyes, had a tendency to reduce redetachment (22% vs 36%) (P = .32). Lensectomy was performed in 61% of phakic eyes, with no effect on redetachment (20% vs 21%) (P = .92). On multivariate analysis, PVR and hypotony were significantly associated with redetachment. Conclusions: PPV with PFCL achieved high SSAS and FAS rates. PVR and hypotony were the main preoperative factors associated with anatomic failure. In cases without PVR, C3F8 tamponade significantly increased SSAS. Encircling scleral buckling showed a nonsignificant tendency toward an increase in SSAS. Lensectomy had no effect on SSAS.

Incidence and onset time of epiretinal membranes after two retinopexy techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and onset time of epiretinal membranes after two surgical techniques to treat retinal detachment (retinopexy). METHOD: Non-experimental, retrospective, longitudinal and comparative study in patients treated of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment either with cryotherapy and scleral buckle (group 1) or vitrectomy techniques (group 2), without an epiretinal membrane at the moment of surgery. We compared the incidence of postoperative epiretinal membrane between groups, the median onset time (Mann-Whitney's U) and the proportions of eyes without an epiretinal membrane along time with a survival analysis (log-rank). RESULTS: 112 eyes in group 1, 48 in group 2; the incidence of epiretinal membrane was 23.2% in group 1 and 20.8% in group 2 (p = 0.8). The median time of onset was 12 weeks in group 1 (interquartile rank 8.75-16) and 18 in group 2 (12.5-22, p = 0.02). The log-rank test showed no differences of incidence along the follow-up between groups (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Epiretinal membranes appear early after retinopexy, before in eyes treated with crio-retinopexy. Although their incidence does not differ between groups, detecting them could start two months after a scleral buckle and three after a vitrectomy procedure.

OBJETIVO: Comparar la incidencia y el tiempo en que aparecen las membranas epirretinianas después de dos técnicas quirúrgicas para tratar el desprendimiento de retina (retinopexia). MÉTODO: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, longitudinal y comparativo en pacientes operados por desprendimiento regmatógeno primario de retina sin una membrana epirretiniana al momento de la cirugía, divididos en grupos: operados mediante criorretinopexia/cerclaje escleral (grupo 1) o vitrectomía (grupo 2). Se compararon entre grupos la incidencia de membrana epirretiniana, la mediana del tiempo de aparición (U de Mann-Whitney) y las proporciones de ojos sin membrana epirretiniana temporalmente mediante un análisis de sobrevida (log-rank). RESULTADOS: En 112 ojos en el grupo 1 y 48 ojos en el grupo 2, la incidencia de membrana epirretiniana fue del 23.2% en el grupo 1 y del 20.8% en el grupo 2 (p = 0.8). La mediana del tiempo de aparición fue de 12 semanas en el grupo 1 (rango intercuartílico [RIC]: 8.75-16) y de 18 semanas en el grupo 2 (RIC: 12.5-22; p = 0.02). La prueba de log-rank no mostró diferencias en la incidencia durante el seguimiento (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONES: Las membranas epirretinianas se presentan tempranamente después de una retinopexia, antes en ojos operados mediante criorretinopexia. De acuerdo con la incidencia observada, su búsqueda podría empezar 2 meses después de un cerclaje y 3 meses después de una vitrectomía.

Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.

Pneumatic retinopexy (PR) is a minimally invasive, non-incisional procedure for repairing uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. It consists of an intravitreal gas injection followed by the maintenance of a postoperative head position and the use of laser or cryopexy to seal the retinal breaks. It was initially indicated for a single or a group of retinal breaks no larger than 1 clock hour involving the superior 8 clock hours in phakic eyes with no proliferative vitreoretinopathy. We aim to perform a narrative review on pneumatic retinopexy since the last major review of 2008, based on a Medline search up to June 20 2021 using multiple search words including pneumatic retinopexy, pneumoretinopexy, retinal detachment, and pars plana vitrectomy. Indications for PR have been expanded and include pseudophakic eyes, eyes with mild PVR, and even breaks in the inferior fundus. Depending on the case selection, PR has a single-operation success rate ranging from 45 to 80%. Despite the lower single operation success rate, the functional outcomes of those eyes repaired successfully by primary PR exceed those of scleral buckling (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Best corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia scores, mental health scores, and vision-related functioning scores were all better in PR-treated eyes compared to PPV-treated eyes. PR should be strongly considered for eligible patients with a primary uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.

Pars plana vitrectomy plus scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrec-tomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. / Vitrectomía pars plana asociada a banda de silicona comparada con vitrectomía pars plana para desprendimiento de retina pseudofáquico y afáquico.

INTRODUCTION: Cataract surgery increases the risk for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling are two surgical procedures used for its repair. The combination of both techniques had been proposed for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in patients with previous cataract surgery (pseudophakic or aphakic), but its effectiveness remains unclear. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified four systematic reviews with eight studies overall, one of them was a randomized trial. With this data, we conclud-ed that pars plana vitrectomy plus scleral buckle may make little or no difference in primary or final retinal reattachment rate nor in final visual acuity, but the certainty of the evidence is low. In terms of surgery complications, we are uncertain if vitrecto-my plus scleral buckle increases the risk of proliferative vitreoretinopathy or reduces the risk of glaucoma because the certainty of the evidence is very low.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía de cataratas es un factor de riesgo para el desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno. Dentro de las técnicas utilizadas para su reparación, se encuentran la vitrectomía pars plana y la banda de silicona. La combinación de ambas técnicas ha sido propuesta en pacientes con desprendimiento de retina previamente operados de cataratas (pseudofáquicos o afáquicos), pero su efectividad no está clara. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos cuatro revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron ocho estudios primarios, de los cuales, uno corresponde a un ensayo aleatorizado. A partir de éste, concluimos que la combinación de vitrectomía pars plana y banda de silicona podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en la reaplicación retinal primaria, en la reaplicación retinal final y en la agudeza visual, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. Respecto a las complicaciones, no es posible establecer con claridad si la combinación de ambas técnicas aumenta la frecuencia de vitreorretinopatía proliferativa o si disminuye el desarrollo de glaucoma, debido a que la certeza de la evidencia fue evaluada como muy baja.

Vitrectomía pars plana asociada a banda de silicona comparada con vitrectomía pars plana para desprendimiento de retina pseudofáquico y afáquico / Pars plana vitrectomy plus scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrec-tomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía de cataratas es un factor de riesgo para el desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno. Dentro de las técnicas utilizadas para su reparación, se encuentran la vitrectomía pars plana y la banda de silicona. La combinación de ambas técnicas ha sido propuesta en pacientes con desprendimiento de retina previamente operados de cataratas (pseudofáquicos o afáquicos), pero su efectividad no está clara. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos cuatro revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron ocho estudios primarios, de los cuales, uno corresponde a un ensayo aleatorizado. A partir de éste, concluimos que la combinación de vitrectomía pars plana y banda de silicona podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en la reaplicación retinal primaria, en la reaplicación retinal final y en la agudeza visual, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. Respecto a las complicaciones, no es posible establecer con claridad si la combinación de ambas técnicas aumenta la frecuencia de vitreorretinopatía proliferativa o si disminuye el desarrollo de glaucoma, debido a que la certeza de la evidencia fue evaluada como muy baja.

INTRODUCTION: Cataract surgery increases the risk for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling are two surgical procedures used for its repair. The combination of both techniques had been proposed for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in patients with previous cataract surgery (pseudophakic or aphakic), but its effectiveness remains unclear. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified four systematic reviews with eight studies overall, one of them was a randomized trial. With this data, we conclud-ed that pars plana vitrectomy plus scleral buckle may make little or no difference in primary or final retinal reattachment rate nor in final visual acuity, but the certainty of the evidence is low. In terms of surgery complications, we are uncertain if vitrecto-my plus scleral buckle increases the risk of proliferative vitreoretinopathy or reduces the risk of glaucoma because the certainty of the evidence is very low.

Peritomy-sparing scleral buckle.

PURPOSE: To introduce a modified technique for encircling circumferential scleral buckling without peritomy thorough a small conjunctival opening for the repair of uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD). METHODS: This technique was performed in 10 eyes of 10 patients with primary rhegmatogenous RD who underwent encircling circumferential scleral buckling without peritomy. Transconjunctival traction sutures were placed in four rectus muscles. After transconjunctival location of the retinal break, a 5- to 6-mm radial conjunctival incision was performed in 4 quadrants without cutting the limbal conjunctiva-Tenon's capsule. A 240-silicone band in scleral belt loops was used for an encircling circumferential buckle. After drainage and cryopexy, SF6 was used for tamponade. The incision was closed via layered closure only ocassionally. RESULTS: Primary attachment success of 100% was achieved by single procedure. The intraoperative and postoperative complications observed included subconjunctival hemorrhage observed in 5 (50%) of eyes. These disappeared in the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal conjunctival incision in scleral buckle without peritomy can achieve excellent anatomical success in patients with rhegmatogenous RD without distorting ocular surface anatomy. This is the first description of technique preserving corneal limbus anatomy that could convert buckling surgery to more attractive option for retina surgeons.

Primary Repair of Moderate Severity Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Critical Decision-Making Algorithm.

We reviewed all the available data regarding the current management of non-complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and aimed to propose a new decision-making algorithm aimed to improve the single surgery success rate for mid-severity rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. An online review of the Pubmed database was performed. We searched for all available manuscripts about the anatomical and functional outcomes after the surgical management, by either scleral buckle or primary pars plana vitrectomy, of retinal detachment. The search was limited to articles published from January 1995 to December 2015. All articles obtained from the search were carefully screened and their references were manually reviewed for additional relevant data. Our search specifically focused on preoperative clinical data that were associated with the surgical outcomes. After categorizing the available data according to their level of evidence, with randomized-controlled clinical trials as the highest possible level of evidence, followed by retrospective studies, and retrospective case series as the lowest level of evidence, we proceeded to design a logical decision-making algorithm, enhanced by our experiences as retinal surgeons. A total of 7 randomized-controlled clinical trials, 19 retrospective studies, and 9 case series were considered. Additional articles were also included in order to support the observations further. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is a potentially blinding disorder. Its surgical management seems to depend more on a surgeon´s preference than solid scientific data or is based on a good clinical history and examination. The algorithms proposed herein strive to offer a more rational approach to improve both anatomical and functional outcomes after the first surgery.

[Giant retinal tears treated with lens sparing, bimanual 23 g vitrectomy without scleral buckle]. / Desgarros retinianos gigantes tratados con vitrectomía calibre 23, abordaje bimanual, sin cercaje escleral y sin tocar el cristalino.

BACKGROUND: A giant retinal tear is defined as a full thickness break in the neurosensory retina that extends circumferentially for 3 or more clock hours around the retina in the presence of a posterior vitreous detachment. It is one of the more complex surgical scenarios that a retina surgeon can face. There is no consensus on the ideal surgical technique; however, the "traditional" approach has been to perform a combined procedure including lensectomy, scleral buckle and vitrectomy. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome over 2 years of five patients with giant retinal tears managed with lens sparing, bimanual 23-gauge vitrectomy without scleral buckle. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with giant retinal tears managed with lens sparing, bimanual 23-gauge vitrectomy without scleral buckle. Included in the analysis were age, lens status, etiology and size of the tear, pre- and postoperative visual acuity, anatomic success, tamponade used, laser or criopexy where recorded. RESULTS: Three patients had high myopia, one secondary to blunt trauma and one with Wagner-Stickler syndrome were included in the analysis. The size of the tear varied from 120-280°. Anatomic success was achieved in all patients. One patient developed proliferative vitreoretinopathy and was re-operated and the retina remained attached. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of selected patients, lens-sparing bimanual 23-gauge vitrectomy without scleral buckle seems a safe and effective option in the management of retinal detachment associated with giant retinal tears. Further prospective and comparative studies are warranted to establish the role of this technique in the treatment of patients with this complex pathology.

Antecedentes: el desgarro retiniano gigante es la rotura del espesor total de la retina neurosensorial con extensión circunferencial de 3 o más husos horarios aunado a desprendimiento de vítreo posterior, y constituye uno de los escenarios quirúrgicos más complejos para el cirujano de retina y vítreo. No existe consenso en cuanto a su manejo; sin embargo, tradicionalmente se ha empleado un abordaje que combina lensectomía, cerclaje y vitrectomía. Objetivo: reportar la evolución a dos años de 5 pacientes con desgarro gigante tratados con vitrectomía 23 g, abordaje bimanual, sin lensectomía y sin cerclaje escleral. Material y métodos: estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo de pacientes con desgarro retiniano gigante, tratados con vitrectomía 23 g, abordaje bimanual, sin lensectomía ni cerclaje escleral. Se estudiaron la edad, estado del cristalino, etiología y extensión del desgarro, agudeza visual, resultado anatómico, taponamiento usado, criopexia o láser. Resultados: se incluyeron 3 pacientes con miopía alta, 1 con traumatismo contuso y 1 con síndrome de Wagner-Stickler. La extensión del desgarro fue de 120 a 280°. Todos con éxito anatómico y mejoría de la agudeza visual. Un paciente con vitreorretinopatía proliferativa se reintervino y la retina permaneció aplicada hasta el final del periodo analizado. Conclusiones: en este selecto grupo de pacientes la vitrectomía calibre 23 con abordaje bimanual, sin cerclaje escleral y sin tocar el cristalino, dio buenos resultados anatómicos y visuales en un seguimiento a dos años. Para establecer el papel que corresponde a esta técnica en el tratamiento de esta compleja patología se requieren estudios prospectivos y comparativos.