Changes in REVEAL Lite 2 risk status are associated with long-term outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A post-hoc analysis of the GRIPHON study.

BACKGROUND: Mortality risk assessment informs clinical management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) Lite 2 is a simplified risk calculator discriminating 1-year mortality risk. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 GRIPHON study assessed changes in REVEAL Lite 2 risk score with selexipag versus placebo and whether changes were prognostic or predictive of time to first morbidity/mortality (M/M) event. RESULTS: REVEAL Lite 2 risk category discriminated M/M risk (landmark concordance indices: 0.68-0.76, selexipag; 0.65-0.70, placebo). Across baseline risk categories, hazard ratios supported a lower risk of M/M events with selexipag versus placebo: low, 0.573 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.361-0.908; p = 0.0178); intermediate, 0.423 (95% CI 0.274-0.655; p = 0.0001); and high, 0.711 (9% CI 0.520-0.972; p = 0.0326). Odds ratios for risk improvement were 2.0 (95% CI 1.50-2.65), 1.8 (95% CI 1.38-2.43), and 2.0 (95% CI 1.43-2.72) for selexipag versus placebo at 16, 26, and 52 weeks, respectively (all p < 0.001). REVEAL Lite 2 risk improvement at week 16 explained 19.1% of the treatment effect in all patients and 47.0% in patients with REVEAL Lite 2 baseline risk score of ≥7. CONCLUSIONS: REVEAL Lite 2 can monitor PAH M/M risk and facilitate treatment optimization. Baseline REVEAL Lite 2 risk score was prognostic of M/M risk in patients with PAH and mediates treatment effect up to 47% for those at higher risk. Lower M/M risk with selexipag versus placebo occurred irrespective of baseline risk category (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01106014).

Safety and Effectiveness of Selexipag in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety and effectiveness of treating pediatric patients who have pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with selexipag in a real-world, multicenter cohort, given that data supporting its use in pediatric PAH are sparse. STUDY DESIGN: We report a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of children with PAH treated with selexipag. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the medical records. Clinical parameters were analyzed at 3 timepoints: before selexipag, 3-12 months after selexipag, and >12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, 32 received selexipag as add-on to background therapy, and 55 transitioned from another prostanoid. The median starting and final doses were 4.7 and 28.5 µg/kg/dose twice daily, respectively. Add-on patients demonstrated improved indexed pulmonary to systemic vascular resistance ratio after selexipag initiation (PVRi/SVRi, 0.62v0.53; P = .034) with a lower average mean pulmonary artery pressure (46 vs 39 mm Hg; P = NS), and oxygen consumption (maximal oxygen consumption during cardiopulmonary exercise testing [VO2 max] 27.8 mL/kg/min vs 30.9 mL/kg/min; P = NS). Transition patients demonstrated stable mean pulmonary artery pressure (47 mm Hg vs 45 mm Hg; P = NS) and a lower mean indexed pulmonary vascular resistance (10.9 Wood units∗m2 vs 8.2 Wood units∗m2; P = NS) but late functional worsening in some with VO2 max decreased at follow-up (26.0 mL/kg/min vs 19.5 mL/kg/min). Side effects were noted in 40% of the cohort, but prompted discontinuation in only 2%. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, multicenter cohort, the oral prostacyclin agonist selexipag demonstrates favorable tolerability and effectiveness. Add-on patients demonstrated early hemodynamic improvement. Transition patients demonstrated early stability with risk of late functional worsening, highlighting the importance of ongoing monitoring.

Four-Strata Risk Assessment in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Selexipag in Real-World Settings (EXPOSURE Study).

INTRODUCTION: Risk assessment can aid management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and clinical decision-making. This analysis describes characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with PAH, categorised by risk status at time of treatment escalation with selexipag in clinical settings. METHODS: Patients initiating selexipag in the ongoing multicentre, prospective EXPOSURE (EUPAS19085) study were grouped as low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high or high risk of 1-year mortality according to the ESC/ERS 4-strata method. RESULTS: As of November 2022, 77% (535/698) of patients initiating selexipag had data allowing for risk calculation; 14% (N = 76) were low, 31% (N = 168) intermediate-low, 34% (N = 182) intermediate-high and 20% (N = 109) high risk of 1-year mortality. Overall, patients were predominantly female (71%), with idiopathic/heritable PAH (56%) or PAH associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH; 27%), median age of 60 years and prevalent (2 years) disease. From low to high risk, proportion of CTD-PAH and age increased (from 12%-40% and 46-68 years, respectively); time from diagnosis decreased and presence of cardiovascular risk factors increased. Most patients across risk groups (74-81%) initiated selexipag as part of triple oral combination therapy. Overall median (Q1, Q3) selexipag exposure duration was 10.1 (3.5, 24.1) months. Proportions of hospitalised patients increased with increasing risk group (16-42% from low to high, respectively); more hospitalisations were PAH-related for the high risk (71%) versus other risk groups (47-54%). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 98%, 98%, 93% and 80% at 1-year and 98%, 92%, 81% and 67% at 2-years, from low to high risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical settings, selexipag is initiated across all risk groups, predominantly as triple therapy. Only 45% of patients being at low/intermediate-low risk at selexipag initiation suggests an opportunity for more frequent patient monitoring and earlier treatment escalation, given that 4-strata risk assessment was prognostic for hospitalisations and survival in this contemporary PAH cohort. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease that gets worse over time. To make decisions about treatment, we need to know the stage of the disease. We can do this by measuring the patient's risk of death during the next few years. Selexipag is a medication for PAH. This analysis included patients living in Europe and Canada who started treatment with selexipag for their PAH disease. Our findings suggest that the monitoring of patients' health and the timing of starting selexipag can be improved. This analysis includes 698 patients taking part in the EXPOSURE study (EUPAS19085), which looks at the real-life treatment of patients with PAH. Overall, 71% of patients were female, the median age was 60 years, most had been diagnosed with PAH for around 2 years and were already taking two other medications for their PAH disease. At the beginning of selexipag treatment, 14% of patients were classified as low risk, 31% as intermediate-low risk, 34% as intermediate-high risk and 20% as high risk of mortality within the next year. More high-risk patients were hospitalised compared with the lower risk groups. After 1 year of treatment, more patients in the low (98%) and intermediate-low groups (98%) were alive than those in the intermediate-high (93%) and high risk groups (80%). The same was true after 2 years of treatment with selexipag (98%, 92%, 81% and 67%, respectively). This study confirms that assessing patients' risk levels can indicate how well they will do over time and shows that earlier treatment with selexipag should be considered to potentially prevent worsening of the disease.

Group 5 Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia: Hemodynamics and Treatment.

Group 5 pulmonary hypertension (PH) encompasses diverse diseases, with a few cases linking it to T-cell large granular lymphocytic (LGL) leukemia. We report a case of a 76-year-old woman, diagnosed with LGL leukemia and concomitant PH, treated with oral triple pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy. She initially presented with dyspnea on exertion; evaluation revealed severe precapillary PH. Implementing cyclophosphamide for leukemia along with tadalafil and macitentan for PH led to sustained symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement for over 3 years. At that time, deterioration in PH prompted the addition of selexipag, resulting in sustained clinical improvement for an additional 5 years. This case exemplifies the potential for sustained benefits of PAH therapy in leukemia-associated PH and highlights the need for continued research on the mechanistic relationship between LGL leukemia and PH, with the hope of identifying new management strategies.

Selexipag for patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific therapies are generally ineffective in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease (PH-LD). The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of selexipag, titrated according to individual tolerance, in patients with PH-LD. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with PH-LD between October 2016 and March 2019, who received selexipag treatment, were retrospectively evaluated. Specific parameters, including changes in hemodynamic parameters, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and partial pressure of atrial oxygen/fraction of inspiratory oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) were evaluated. Patients whose 6MWD improved ≥20 m were defined as responders. RESULTS: Eight patients with PH-LD were included, comprising four with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), two with interstitial lung disease (ILD) related to rheumatoid arthritis, one with ILD related to systemic sclerosis, and one with pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis. No statistically significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters and 6MWD were noted following selexipag treatment. However, four patients showed improvements in 6MWD ≥20 m at follow-up and were considered responders. They had a higher body mass index (BMI) and lower PaO2/FiO2 at baseline than non-responders (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). No Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Selexipag was effective in half of the PH-LD cases, emphasizing higher BMI and lower PaO2/FiO2 as possible indicators for favorable response. Since selexipag starting at a low dose with subsequent titration may reduce the risk of early adverse events, it can be considered a treatment option for PH-LD. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Long-Term Data on Efficacy and Safety of Selexipag for Digital Systemic Sclerosis Vasculopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Raynaud phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DUs) are the main signs of digital vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Selexipag is an oral prostacyclin agonist approved for SSc-related pulmonary arterial hypertension. Following our previous preliminary short-course report, we herein present long-term data on selexipag safety and efficacy in the treatment of SSc digital vasculopathy. METHODS: Selexipag was administered to patients with SSc with severe digital vasculopathy refractory or with contraindication to all other vasoactive therapies. Each subject was assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcomes related to RP and DUs were evaluated along with modified Rodnan skin score of the fingers. Digital perfusion was assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA). Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) was also performed. RESULTS: Eight patients with SSc (63% female, mean age 50.1 years) received selexipag. After 12 months of treatment, RP was reported to significantly decrease in the number of daily episodes and mean duration (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). All patients achieved a complete healing of their DUs (P = 0.03) within 6 months. A progressive reduction of fingers skin score was observed (P = 0.03). No structural changes of capillaries were noted on NVC. Conversely, LASCA revealed an important increase in total digital perfusion (P = 0.004) despite seasonal variability. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: We observed a sustained efficacy of selexipag on SSc digital vasculopathy during 1 year of administration. Our promising results encourage the design of a new randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of selexipag on SSc digital vasculopathy.

Prostacyclin synthase deficiency exacerbates systemic inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide-induced septic shock in mice.

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory disorder characterized by life-threateningorgan dysfunction resulting from a dysregulated host response to infection. Prostacyclin (PGI2) is a bioactive lipid produced by PGI synthase (PGIS) and is known to play important roles in inflammatory reactions as well as cardiovascular regulation. However, little is known about the roles of PGIS and PGI2 in systemic inflammatory responses such as septic shock. METHODOLOGY: Systemic inflammation was induced by intraperitoneal injection of 5 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in wild type (WT) or PGIS knockout (KO) mice. Selexipag, a selective PGI2 receptor (IP) agonist, was administered 2 h before LPS injection and again given every 12 h for 3 days. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal injection of LPS induced diarrhea, shivering and hypothermia. These symptoms were more severe in PGIS KO mice than in WT micqe. The expression of Tnf and Il6 genes was notably increased in PGIS KO mice. In contrast, over 95% of WT mice survived 72 h after the administration of LPS, whereas all of the PGIS KO mice had succumbed by that time. The mortality rate of LPS-administrated PGIS KO mice was improved by selexipag administration. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that PGIS-derived PGI2 negatively regulates LPS-induced symptoms via the IP receptor. PGIS-derived PGI2-IP signaling axis may be a new drug target for systemic inflammation in septic shock.

Oral Prostacyclin Pathway Agents Used in PAH: A Targeted Literature Review.

Purpose: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive pulmonary vascular disease that can result in right heart failure and death. Oral prostacyclins play an important role in the management of intermediate-low risk PAH. This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify and compare evidence supporting use of oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs: selexipag and oral treprostinil) in intermediate-low risk PAH. Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted. Literature databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane reviews) were searched for studies describing clinical practice and treatment outcomes for oral treprostinil and selexipag globally, published in English (2012 to 2022). Electronic searches were supplemented by manual-searches of targeted conferences (2020 to 2022), and reference lists of identified publications were reviewed. One reviewer assessed studies for eligibility. Results: In total, 95 publications met inclusion criteria: 47 full-text articles (selexipag n = 22; oral treprostinil n = 16; selexipag and oral treprostinil n = 9) and 48 conference materials. Selexipag and oral treprostinil target the prostacyclin pathway differently; their label-supporting trials had different primary endpoints (disease progression and hospitalization vs exercise capacity and disease progression), differing baseline therapy (0, 1 or 2 vs 0 or 1 baseline treatments), titration duration and dosing (personalized dose capped at 1600 ug twice daily (BID) vs increasing doses over time with no maximum dose), respectively. While both oral PPAs have demonstrated reduced risk of disease progression, only selexipag showed reduction in hospitalization rates. Oral PPAs have been shown to reduce healthcare costs in real-world clinical practice. This difference is reflected in labeled indications. Conclusion: Given differences in trial- and real-world outcomes, number of prior therapies, and dosing, personalizing the choice of oral PPA is critical to maximizing the benefit for individual patients.

PAH is a condition that causes heart failure. It is important to take medicines to slow down this process. For people with early disease, there are some medicines that can be taken as a tablet rather than as an injection to slow down disease progression. The differences between two of the tablet options ­ selexipag and oral treprostinil, are unclear. We reviewed publications describing how, when and why these medicines are used and how well they work, to improve our understanding of the value of these medicines to people with PAH.

Effectiveness of a Prostacyclin IP Receptor Agonist in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Real-world Andalusian Setting: The RAMPHA Study.

PURPOSE: The pillar for therapeutic decisions in the evolution of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the patients' prognostic stratification. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Spanish real-world setting to assess the clinical improvement of PAH patients treated with selexipag measured as changes in the risk profile. Secondary objectives were to describe their baseline characteristics, initial risk status, and variables used to assess patient survival and adverse events. FINDINGS: Total 42 patients (mean age 52.36 [SD: 15.09] years) were included. All had received initial endothelin receptor antagonist treatment and 95.2% dual therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor or riociguat. At 6 to 12 months from baseline, patients risk stratification tripled the percentage of patients with low risk, and a trend towards improved risk stratification (P = 0.122). World Health Organization functional class changed, with more patients in milder classes (P = 0.003), and symptom progression slowed down (P < 0.0001). At 3-years, survival was 85.7% and the estimated median survival time was 2.73 years (SD: 1.351; 95% CI: 2.51-2.95). IMPLICATIONS: Selexipag did not achieve a significant improvement in risk profile, although it did show an excellent survival rate, effectively improved functional class, and delayed symptom progression in real life. Selexipag was well tolerated and showed a favorable safety profile, supporting a clinical benefit for PAH patients.

Switching from Beraprost to Selexipag in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights from a Phase IV Study of the Japanese Registry (The EXCEL Study: EXChange from bEraprost to seLexipag Study).

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a significant challenge in cardiology, necessitating advancements in treatment strategies. This study explores the safety and efficacy of transitioning patients from beraprost to selexipag, a novel selective prostacyclin receptor agonist, within a Japanese cohort. Employing a multicenter, open-label, prospective design, 25 PAH patients inadequately managed on beraprost were switched to selexipag. Key inclusion criteria included ongoing beraprost therapy for ≥3 months, a diagnosis of PAH confirmed by mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg, and current treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists and/or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Outcomes assessed were changes in hemodynamic parameters (mPAP, cardiac index, pulmonary vascular resistance) and the 6 min walk distance (6-MWD) over 3-6 months. The study found no statistically significant changes in these parameters post-switch. However, a subset of patients, defined as responders, demonstrated improvements in all measured hemodynamic parameters, suggesting a potential benefit in carefully selected patients. The transition was generally well-tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. This investigation underscores the importance of personalized treatment strategies in PAH, highlighting that certain patients may benefit from switching to selexipag, particularly those previously on higher doses of beraprost. Further research is needed to elucidate the predictors of positive response to selexipag and optimize treatment regimens for this complex condition.

Direct prostacyclin transition in pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are commonly treated with the prostacyclin analog treprostinil in IV, SQ, inhaled or oral form, or the prostacyclin receptor agonist selexipag. Patients who transition between these medications often follow recommendations for gradual up- and down-titrations that take place over several days in the hospital or several weeks as an outpatient. However, hospital resources are limited, and long transitions are inconvenient for patients and families. We report a case series of eight pediatric patients with PAH transitioned directly between prostacyclins with no overlapping doses. Direct medication transitions occurred in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), at home and in cardiology clinic. Equivalent doses for selexipag were estimated using information extrapolated from experience, published materials and selexipag study guidelines. All patients completed direct transition as planned and remained on transition dose for at least 1 week. In most cases selexipag was up-titrated at home after establishing initial transition dose. In select patients, direct prostacyclin transition in pediatric patients with PAH is safe, effective, convenient for families and reduces the use of hospital resources.

Selexipag Dosing Strategies for Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

This retrospective chart review of patients less than 18 years old with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) receiving selexipag was conducted to describe selexipag dosing practices, impact on concomitant PAH therapies, and the safety and efficacy of selexipag. Twenty-seven patients aged 1-17 years started a median dose of oral selexipag 100 µg twice daily. Therapy was increased by a median of 100 µg twice daily every 6 days to a maximally tolerated median dose of 800 µg twice daily. All 24 patients on another prostacyclin derivative were able to discontinue therapy at their maximum tolerated selexipag dose; other concomitant PAH therapies did not change. Changes in echocardiogram data and 6-MWT results were variable. No patients discontinued selexipag; four patients received decreased doses due to flushing (n = 1), drug interactions (n = 2), or increased frequency of nose bleeds (n = 1).

Impact of different sequential triple oral combination therapies based selexipag on outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: While the GRIPHON study and others have confirmed the efficacy and safety of selexipag with single, dual, and initial triple combination therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), multicenters studies concerning diverse triple oral combination therapies based on selexipag are limited. HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of various sequential triple oral combination therapies on PAH outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out involving 192 patients from 10 centers, who were receiving sequential triple oral combination therapy consisting of an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i)/riociguat and selexipag. Clinical parameters, event-free survival, and all-cause survival were assessed and analyzed at baseline and posttreatment. RESULTS: Among the 192 patients, 37 were treated with ERA + riociguat + selexipag, and 155 patients received ERA + PDE5i + selexipag. Both sequential triple oral combination therapies improved the World Health Organization functional class and raised the count of low-risk parameters. As a result of the larger patients' population in the ERA + PDE5i + selexipag group, these individuals exhibited significant increases in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, right ventricle, and eccentricity index, and significant decreases in N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide after 6 months of treatment. Nevertheless, both sequential triple oral combination therapy groups demonstrated similar shifts in these clinical parameters between baseline and 6 months. Baseline 6MWD and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were independent predictors of survival in patients undergoing ERA + PDE5i + selexipag therapy. Importantly, no significant differences were found in 6-month event-free survival and all-cause survival between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Different oral sequential triple combination therapies based on selexipag could comparably improve outcomes in patients with PAH.

Selexipag for the Treatment of Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the safety, dosing regimen, and efficacy of selexipag for pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: A literature search of the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from inception through February 28, 2023. Two reviewers independently searched and evaluated the quality of the studies and pooled data when appropriate. Full-text articles of studies of children diagnosed with PH and treated with selexipag were eligible. Pediatric patients with PH were classified into 2 groups: the add-on therapy group, in which selexipag was used as a third therapy in addition to the baseline treatment, and the transition therapy group, in which patients were switched from parenteral prostacyclin analogs to selexipag. FINDINGS: Fourteen studies involving 58 pediatric patients with PH were included. All studies were either case reports or case series. Overall, 30 and 28 patients were in the add-on and transition therapy groups, respectively. In both groups, selexipag was initially administered as 50-200 µg twice daily and titrated to a tolerated dosage of 200-1,600 µg twice daily. Prostacyclin analogs were simultaneously weaned for patients in the transition group. In the add-on therapy group, 16 patients (80.0%) were at low risk of the World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC I/II), 12 (76.9%) were at low risk of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD; >350 m), and 21 (95.5%) were at low risk of the pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRi; <20 WU/m2). Furthermore, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were significantly improved. More than 70% of patients experienced common tolerable side effects, such as headache, nausea, and diarrhea. In the transition therapy group, 5 patients (55.6%) were at low risk according to WHO FC I/II, 6 (66.7%) were at low risk according to 6MWD, and 14 (87.5) were at low risk according to PVRi; however, selexipag had no significant effect on their hemodynamic parameters. Additionally, more than 80% of patients experienced no side effects. IMPLICATIONS: Selexipag as add-on therapy or for transition from prostacyclin analogs may have a favorable safety profile and potential efficacy for pediatric patients with PH. Further high-quality evidence of the efficacy and safety of selexipag for the treatment of pediatric PH is warranted.

Disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with selexipag in real-world settings from the SPHERE registry (SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry).

BACKGROUND: Selexipag is an oral prostacyclin receptor agonist, indicated for pulmonary arterial hypertension to delay disease progression and reduce the risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension-related hospitalization. SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry (NCT03278002) was a US-based, prospective, real-world registry of selexipag-treated patients. METHODS: Adults with pulmonary hypertension (enrolled 2016-2020) prescribed selexipag were followed for ≤18 months, with data collected at routine clinic visits. Patients were defined as newly or previously initiated if they had started selexipag ≤60 days or >60 days, respectively, before enrollment. RESULTS: The registry included 829 patients (430 newly initiated, 399 previously initiated; 759 with pulmonary arterial hypertension), of whom 55.6% were World Health Organization functional class (FC) 3/4; 57.3% were intermediate or high risk per Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0. In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, 18-month discontinuation rates for adverse events were 22.0%, 32.0%, and 11.9%, and 18-month survival rates were 89.4%, 84.2%, and 94.5% in the overall, newly, and previously initiated patient populations, respectively. From baseline to month 18, most patients had stable or improved FC and stable or improved REVEAL 2.0 risk category status. Discontinuation for adverse events, hospitalization, and survival were similar regardless of patients' individually tolerated selexipag maintenance dose. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis of patients initiating selexipag, most patients had stable or improved FC and REVEAL 2.0 risk category. Similar to the GRIPHON trial, outcomes with selexipag in this real-world study were comparable across maintenance dose strata, with no new safety signals.

Comparative effectiveness of oral therapies targeting the prostacyclin pathway in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral prostanoids are recommended in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and a unsatisfactory response to first-line therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness of oral therapies targeting the prostacyclin pathway in PAH patients. METHODS: An online search of Medline, Cochrane Registry, Scopus and EMBASE libraries (from inception to May, 12020) was performed. Eight randomized controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 3023 patients, of whom 828 receiving oral treprostinil, 607 patients receiving selexipag, 125 patients receiving beraprost, and 1463 patients received placebo. RESULTS: As compared to placebo, oral treprostinil (WMD 9.05, 95% CI 3.0280-15.0839, p = 0.0032) and beraprost (WMD 21.98, 95% CI 5.0536-38.9063, p = 0.0109) arms significantly increased 6 min walking distance (6MWD) at follow-up from baseline, whereas selexipag use was associated with a non-significant increase in 6MWD (WMD 15.41, 95% CI -0.6074; 31.4232, p = 0.0593). Compared to placebo, the risk of clinical worsening was significantly lowered by selexipag (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.65, p < 0.001) and oral treprostinil (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.90, p 0.012), whereas a non-significant reduction of the outcome was related to beraprost use (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36-1.38, p 0.31). No significant difference in 6MWD change and clinical worsening reduction were found among oral treprostinil and selexipag. Beraprost use less frequently caused adverse events as compared to selexipag and oral treprostinil. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in 6MWD change, clinical worsening reduction and adverse events rates were found among oral treprostinil and selexipag, resulting in similar efficacy and safety profile.

Use of the National Cancer Institute Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess treatment tolerability in pulmonary arterial hypertension: qualitative patient research findings in current and former users of oral selexipag.

BACKGROUND: Understanding patients' perspectives regarding drug tolerability, in addition to effectiveness, provides a complete picture of the patient experience and supports more informed therapeutic decision-making. The item library of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to measure patient-reported frequency, severity, and interference of adverse events (AEs) associated with cancer therapies. This qualitative interview study assessed the suitability of items selected from the PRO-CTCAE library for assessing tolerability of selexipag, a medication targeting the prostacyclin pathway for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: Two rounds of 10 qualitative, web-assisted telephone interviews following a semi-structured guide were conducted in individuals with recent experience taking oral selexipag for PAH. Each interview included concept elicitation to gather participants' perspectives on symptomatic AEs (type, frequency, severity, and interference) and cognitive debriefing of PRO-CTCAE items addressing the most frequently reported AEs of oral selexipag. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 20 participants with PAH (mean [range] age 50 [24-68] years; 75% female; 85% in World Health Organization Functional Class II-III), comprising different races/ethnicities, levels of education, and employment status. Fifteen participants were currently treated with selexipag; five had taken selexipag for ≥ 6 months before discontinuing. The most frequently reported AEs included headache, jaw pain, and nausea (n = 15, 12, and 10 participants, respectively). Diarrhea and headache were identified as the most bothersome AEs by 5 and 4 participants, respectively. Some AEs were transitory (e.g., jaw pain); others were long-lasting (e.g., muscle pain). Based on findings from Round 1 interviews, a flushing item was added and the PRO-CTCAE general pain item was modified to be specific to jaw pain for testing in Round 2. Interview findings identified the following AEs as relevant to assess in a PAH clinical trial: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, flushing, jaw pain, headache, aching muscles, and aching joints. CONCLUSIONS: The PRO-CTCAE items selected in this study and the additional symptomatic AEs identified as patient-relevant have the potential to be included in assessments capturing the patient perspective on tolerability in future studies of selexipag and possibly other PAH therapies.

A real-world analysis of safety profile of selexipag by using FDA adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: The current investigation sought to conduct a real-world analysis of adverse events (AEs) associated with selexipag by utilizing data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: The Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) and the Medicines Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) method were employed to assess the potential associations between selexipag and AEs. Case reports of adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to selexipag were systematically sourced from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: Our analysis identified 281 Preferred Terms (PTs) signals across 20 System Organ Classes (SOCs) were found to meet the screening threshold. The most common AEs were consistent with instructions, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and case reports. Of significant note, unexpected AEs principally target SOCs of infections and infestations, blood and lymphatic system, renal and urinary disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, including pneumonia, metapneumovirus, decreased hemoglobin. transfusion, iron-deficiency anemia, dialysis hypotension, abnormal creatinine renal clearance, liver function test increased, hepatic function abnormal, hepatic enzyme increased. Within the pediatric population, unexpected signals such as pyrexia, pneumonia, and intussusception necessitate special precautionary measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings contribute valuable insights to clinical practice, reinforcing the importance of vigilant monitoring, and can be instrumental in guiding both therapeutic applications and safety assessments of this particular medication.

Impact of selexipag use within 12 months of pulmonary arterial hypertension diagnosis on hospitalizations and medical costs: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Oral selexipag, a prostacyclin pathway agent (PPA), is effective in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of initiating oral selexipag within 12 months of diagnosis on health outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. PAH patients between 1 October 2015 and 30 September 2019 were included. Patients were also required to have received PAH medication within 12 months of their initial diagnosis. Study groups included patients who initiated selexipag within 12 months of PAH diagnosis (SEL ≤ 12) and those who did not initiate any PPA within 12 months of PAH diagnosis (No PPA ≤ 12). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to remove potential confounding between groups. Cox and Poisson regression models were used to compare hospitalization and disease progression. Generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link was used to compare costs. RESULTS: SEL ≤ 12 had lower rate of all-cause hospitalizations (rate ratio: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 0.96) versus no PPA ≤ 12, but no differences in PAH-related hospitalization rate (rate ratio: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.33) or risk of disease progression (hazard ratio: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.44). SEL ≤ 12 incurred lower all-cause (mean difference: -$23 623; 95% CI: -35 537, -8512) and PAH-related total medical costs (mean difference: -$12 927; 95% CI: -19 559, -5679) versus no PPA ≤ 12. CONCLUSION: Selexipag initiation within 12 months of PAH diagnosis demonstrated reductions in all-cause hospitalization rate and medical costs.