Burden and Management of Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Across the World: A Narrative Review.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are particularly susceptible to infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) and are often the first to be affected by an emerging resistant pathogen. Unfortunately, their prevalence and impact on morbidity and mortality according to the type of graft is not systematically reported from high-as well as from low and middle-income countries (HIC and LMIC). Thus, epidemiology on MDRO in SOT recipients could be subjected to reporting bias. In addition, screening practices and diagnostic resources may vary between countries, as well as the availability of new drugs. In this review, we aimed to depict the burden of main Gram-negative MDRO in SOT patients across HIC and LMIC and to provide an overview of current diagnostic and therapeutic resources.

Characteristics, mortality, associated variables with death, and therapeutic response among HIV-positive, solid organ transplant (SOT), and non-HIV-positive/non-transplant (NHNT) patients with cryptococcosis: First multicenter cohort study in Brazil.

Cryptococcosis is traditionally associated with immunocompromised patients but is increasingly being identified in those without the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other immunocompetent individuals. We aim to describe the characteristics, mortality, and associated variables with death among hospitalized patients with cryptococcosis in Brazil. This is the first multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in seven public tertiary Brazilian hospitals. A total of 384 patients were included; the median age was 39 years and 283 (73.7%) were men. In all, 304 HIV-positive were hosts (79.2%), 16 (4.2%) solid organ transplant (SOT), and 64 (16.7%) non-HIV-positive/non-transplant (NHNT). Central nervous system (CNS) cryptococcosis had a significantly higher number across disease categories, with 313 cases (81.5%). A total of 271 (70.6%) patients were discharged and 113 (29.4%) died during hospitalization. In-hospital mortality among HIV-positive, SOT, and NHNT was 30.3% (92/304), 12.5% (2/16), and 29.7% (19/64), respectively. Induction therapy with conventional amphotericin B (AMB) mainly in combination with fluconazole (234; 84.2%) was the most used. Only 80 (22.3%) patients received an AMB lipid formulation: liposomal (n = 35) and lipid complex (n = 45). Most patients who died belong to the CNS cryptococcosis category (83/113; 73.4%) when compared with the others (P = .017). Multivariate analysis showed that age and disseminated cryptococcosis had a higher risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.05; P = .008 and OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01-3.53; P = .048, respectively). Understanding the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in our settings will help to recognize the burden and causes of mortality and identify strategies to improve this scenario.

This multicenter cohort study included 384 hospitalized individuals with cryptococcosis in Brazil. Most individuals were men (74%), HIV-positive (79%), had central nervous system involvement (82%), and received conventional amphotericin plus fluconazole (84%). In-hospital mortality was high (29%).

Brazilian perspective: antimicrobial stewardship in solid organ transplant.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) infections among solid organ transplant (SOT) patients is very high in Brazil. METHODS: This review will discuss antimicrobial use and resistance in SOT in Brazil, highlighting the main barriers and facilitators for implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). RESULTS: The most common group of MDROs is carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs) are the most frequent MDROs and have been reported as donor-derived as well. Although ASPs are mandatory in the country, there is a lack of information regarding ASPs in SOT recipients. The main barriers for the implementation of ASPs in Brazilian hospitals are lack of electronic medical records, absence of national guidelines specific to SOT recipients, lack of recommendations on surveillance culture to evaluate colonization and transmission of donor-derived MDROs, limited availability of rapid diagnostic tests, and insufficient pharmacist and clinician time allocated to ASP activities in some SOT centers. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MDRO infections caused mainly by VREs and CREs is very high in the country. There is limited data regarding antimicrobial use among SOT recipients in Brazil. The absence of antimicrobial stewardship national guidelines specific to SOT recipients is one of the main barriers for the implementation of ASPs in Brazilian hospitals.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster in solid organ transplant recipients previously immunised with inactivated versus mRNA vaccines: A prospective cohort study.

Background: Solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients have worse COVID-19 outcomes than general population and effective immunisation in these patients is essential but more difficult to reach. We aimed to determine the immunogenicity of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster in SOT recipients previously immunised with either inactivated or homologous SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Methods: Prospective cohort study of SOT recipients under medical care at Red de Salud UC-CHRISTUS, Chile, previously vaccinated with either CoronaVac or BNT162b2. All participants received a BNT162b2 vaccine booster. The primary study end point was anti-SARS-CoV-2 total IgG antibodies (TAb) seropositivity at 8-12 weeks (56-84 days) post booster. Secondary end points included neutralising antibodies (NAb) and specific T-cell responses. Findings: A total of 140 (50% kidney, 38% liver, 6% heart) SOT recipients (mean age 54 [13.6] years; 64 [46%] women) were included. Of them, 62 had homologous (three doses of BNT162b2) and 78 heterologous vaccine schedules (two doses of CoronaVac followed by BNT162b2 booster). Boosters were received at a median of 21.3 weeks after primary vaccination. The proportion achieving TAb seropositivity (82.3% vs 65.4%, P = 0.035) and NAb positivity (77.4% vs 55.1%, P = 0.007) were higher for the homologous versus the heterologous group. On the other hand, the number of IFN-γ and IL-2 secreting SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells did not differ significantly between groups. Interpretation: This cohort study shows that homologous mRNA vaccine priming plus boosting in SOT recipients, reaches a significantly higher humoral immune response than inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine priming followed by heterologous mRNA booster. Funding: School of Medicine, UC-Chile and ANID.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05124509.

Liver transplant after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted liver organ transplantation. The American Society of Transplantation recommends a minimum of 28 days after symptom resolution for organ donation. However, the exact time for transplantation for recipients is unknown. Considering that mortality on the waiting list for patients with MELD >25 or fulminant hepatitis is higher than that of COVID-19, the best time for surgery after SARS-CoV-2 infection remains undetermined. This study aims to expand the current knowledge regarding the Liver Transplantation (LT) time for patients after COVID-19 and to provide transplant physicians with essential decision-making tools to manage these critically ill patients during the pandemic. METHODS: Systematic review of patients who underwent liver transplantation after diagnosis of COVID-19. The MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, Lilacs, Embase, and Scielo databases were searched until June 20, 2021. The MESH terms used were "COVID-19" and "Liver transplantation". RESULTS: 558 articles were found; of these 13 articles and a total of 18 cases of COVID-19 prior to liver transplantation were reported. The mean age was 38.7±14.6, with male prevalence. Most had mild symptoms of COVID. Five patients have specific treatment for COVID-19 with convalescent plasm or remdesivir/oseltamivir, just one patient received hydroxychloroquine, and 12 patients received only symptomatic treatment. The median time between COVID-19 to LT was 19 days (13.5‒44.5). Deceased donor liver transplantation accounted for 61% of cases, while living donor transplantation was 39%. CONCLUSION: Despite the concerns regarding the postoperative evolution, the mortality of patients with high MELD or fulminant hepatitis transplanted shortly after COVID-19 diagnosis does not seem to be higher. (PROSPERO, registration number = CRD42021261790).

Immune Response to COVID-19 and mRNA Vaccination in Immunocompromised Individuals: A Narrative Review.

Immunocompromised individuals are at high risk of poor coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes and demonstrate a lower immune response to COVID-19 vaccines, including to the novel mRNA vaccines that have been shown to elicit high neutralizing antibody levels. This review synthesized available data on the immune response to COVID-19 and critically assessed mRNA COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in this vulnerable subpopulation. Patients with various immunocompromising conditions exhibit diverse responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 severity and mortality, and available vaccines elicit lower immune responses, particularly in solid organ transplant recipients. Strategies to improve vaccine responses in immunocompromised individuals are being implemented in vaccine recommendations, including the use of a third and fourth vaccine dose beyond the two-dose series. Additional doses may enhance vaccine effectiveness and help provide broad coverage against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Continued investigation of vaccines and dosing regimens will help refine approaches to help protect this vulnerable subpopulation from COVID-19.

Role of fibrinogen in the attenuation of ischemia reperfusion and remote ischemic preconditioning / El papel del fibrinógeno en la atenuación de la isquemia-reperfusión y el preacondicionamiento isquémico remoto

Abstract Background: Ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) is a common hazard involved in many human diseases, such as cerebral stroke, myocardial infarction, solid organ transplant dysfunction or failure, and vascular diseases. Understanding the molecular bases of this injury is essential for the prevention and control of these life-threatening conditions. Ischemic and remote ischemic preconditioning techniques (IPC and RIPC, respectively) have gained increasing importance in the clinical practice to protect against the IRI; however, the exact mechanisms of these techniques are not fully understood, which renders their clinical application query. Possible effectors: Nitric oxide (NO) has been reported by multiple studies to be an important mediator of the protective effects of those techniques. While the physiological concentrations of NO and fibrinogen (FB) are known to antagonize each other, the circulating levels of both effectors increase in response to RIPC. Hypothesis: While NO has potential anti-inflammatory effects, non-soluble fibrinogen (sFB) shows pro- inflammatory effects. However, the sFB may have the potential to act synergistically rather than antagonistically with NO toward the attenuation of the IRI. Conclusion: While increased FB is considered a risk factor for cardiovascular and inflammatory conditions that is also able to decrease the efflux of NO, and increase the NO oxidative metabolits and S- nitroglutathione, the increased sFB during the acute phase reaction might have other protective aspects that should be carefully investigated.

Resumen Antecedentes: La lesión por isquemia-reperfusión (LIR) es un riesgo común involucrado en muchas enfermedades humanas tales como derrame cerebral, infarto del miocardio, disfunción o falla de trasplante de órgano sólido, y enfermedades vasculares. Una comprensión de la base molecular de esta lesión es fundamental para la prevención y el control de estas enfermedades potencialmente mortales. Las técnicas de preacondicionamiento isquémico y preacondicionamiento isquémico remoto (PIR) han cobrado una creciente importancia en la práctica clínica para la protección contra la LIR, sin embargo, los mecanismos precisos de estas técnicas no se entienden plenamente, lo cual pone en duda su aplicación clínica. Posibles efectores: El óxido nítrico (ON) ha sido reportado por varios estudios como un importante mediador de los efectos protectores de estas técnicas. Si bien se sabe que las concentraciones fisiológicas del ON y fibrinógeno son antagónicas, los niveles circulantes de ambos efectores aumentan en respuesta al PIR. Hipótesis: Aunque el ON tiene posibles efectos anti-inflamatorios, el fibrinógeno insoluble muestra efectos proinflamatorios. Sin embargo, el fibrinógeno soluble puede tener el potencial de actuar de manera sinérgica en lugar de antagónica con el ON hacia la atenuación de la LIR. Conclusión: Aunque el fibrinógeno elevado se considera un factor de riesgo para las enfermedades cardiovasculares e inflamatorias, que también puede disminuir la descarga de ON y aumentar los niveles de metabolitos oxidantes del ON y de S-nitrosoglutatión, el aumento de fibrinógeno soluble durante la reacción de fase aguda puede tener otros aspectos protectores que deben ser cuidadosamente investigados.

Liver transplant after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review

Abstract Background: The Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted liver organ transplantation. The American Society of Transplantation recommends a minimum of 28 days after symptom resolution for organ donation. However, the exact time for transplantation for recipients is unknown. Considering that mortality on the waiting list for patients with MELD >25 or fulminant hepatitis is higher than that of COVID-19, the best time for surgery after SARS-CoV-2 infection remains undetermined. This study aims to expand the current knowledge regarding the Liver Transplantation (LT) time for patients after COVID-19 and to provide transplant physicians with essential decision-making tools to manage these critically ill patients during the pandemic. Methods: Systematic review of patients who underwent liver transplantation after diagnosis of COVID-19. The MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, Lilacs, Embase, and Scielo databases were searched until June 20, 2021. The MESH terms used were "COVID-19" and "Liver transplantation". Results: 558 articles were found; of these 13 articles and a total of 18 cases of COVID-19 prior to liver transplantation were reported. The mean age was 38.7±14.6, with male prevalence. Most had mild symptoms of COVID. Five patients have specific treatment for COVID-19 with convalescent plasm or remdesivir/oseltamivir, just one patient received hydroxychloroquine, and 12 patients received only symptomatic treatment. The median time between COVID-19 to LT was 19 days (13.5-44.5). Deceased donor liver transplantation accounted for 61% of cases, while living donor transplantation was 39%. Conclusion: Despite the concerns regarding the postoperative evolution, the mortality of patients with high MELD or fulminant hepatitis transplanted shortly after COVID-19 diagnosis does not seem to be higher. (PROSPERO, registration number = CRD42021261790)

Serie de casos de trasplante hepático ortotópico del Hospital "Dr. Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia" / Case series of liver transplantation in "Dr. Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia Hospital"

Resumen Objetivo: Analizar los resultados y evolución del programa de trasplante hepático del Hospital "Dr. Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia", así como las complicaciones más frecuentes y características de las hepatopatías que llevaron a trasplante hepático. Métodos: Esta es una investigación retrospectiva que involucra la revisión de expedientes clínicos de los pacientes que recibieron un trasplante de hígado entre los años 2009 y 2018 en el Hospital "Dr. Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia" en San José, Costa Rica. Se consideraron las siguientes variables categóricas o discontinuas: edad, sexo, nacionalidad, lugar de procedencia, manifestaciones de la hepatopatía, motivo del trasplante, curso clínico postrasplante, comorbilidades, medicamentos empleados, complicaciones, resultados relevantes de exámenes de gabinete y biopsias. Los cálculos estadísticos se llevaron a cabo con paquetes estadísticos STATA, empleando como umbral de significancia estadística un valor de p menor de 0,05. Resultados: La muestra estuvo compuesta de un total de 45 cirugías de trasplante hepático y 44 pacientes que requirieron trasplante de hígado entre abril de 2009 y agosto de 2018, provenientes principalmente de la provincia de San José. El promedio de edad al momento del trasplante para la muestra total fue de 51 años. La hepatopatía que más frecuentemente llevó a trasplante fue la cirrosis etílica, seguida por esteatohepatitis no alcohólica y cirrosis criptogénica. Las complicaciones de la hepatopatía documentadas previo al trasplante: várices esofágicas, sangrado digestivo alto y síndrome hepatorenal. De los pacientes incluidos en el estudio fallecieron 10 en total, lo cual equivale a 22.7%. Conclusiones: La mortalidad observada en los casos de trasplante hepático analizados fue de 22,7%, la mayoría de los casos fueron llevados a trasplante por hepatopatía relacionada con cirrosis etílica, esteatohepatitis y cirrosis criptogénica.

Abstract Objective. To analyze the outcomes, most frequent complications and characteristics of the patients enrolled in the Liver Transplant Program from the Hospital "Dr. Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia". Methods: This is a retrospective investigation that involves the revision of clinical records from the patients that received a liver transplant between the years 2009 and 2018 in the Hospital "Dr. Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia". The following variables were considered: age, gender, nationality, city of residence, manifestations of the liver disease, reason for the liver transplant, clinical outcomes after transplant, comorbidities, medication received, important laboratory results and biopsies. The data analysis was performed with STATA, using a statistic significance threshold of a p < 0.05. Results: The sample was composed of a total of 45 liver transplant surgeries and 44 patients who received a liver transplant between the years 2009 and 2018. The patients mostly came from the city of San José. The average age at the time of the surgery was 51 years. The most common liver disease that led to transplant was alcoholic cirrhosis, followed by NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis. The most common complications of the liver disease documented prior to transplant where esophageal varices, gastrointestinal bleeding and hepatic-renal syndrome. 10 of the patients included in the study died, which corresponds to 22.7% of the sample. Conclusions: The mortality observed in the liver transplant cases analyzed was 22.7%, most of the cases were taken to transplantation due to liver disease related to alcoholic cirrhosis, steatohepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis.

Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) is a promising minimally invasive technique but its oncologic and functional outcomes are not well studied. The primary outcome was the efficacy of RFA, and the secondary outcomes were the functional and anatomical anal changes related to RFA. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected database of patients who had RFA for HSIL at our institution, between August 2018 and March 2020. To be eligible for RFA, all patients had impairment of their immune function. Targeted ablation was applied in all cases, with 5 overlapping pulsations at the targeted HSILs (delivering 12 J/cm2 per application) followed by circumferential, 2-pulsation (12 J/cm2) overlapping anal ablation, to cover the entire anal transition zone. Patients were assessed for recurrence or metachronous disease at 3-month intervals by means of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) and targeted biopsies. Anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, the 36-Item Short Form and Massachusetts General Hospital-Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (MGH-SFQ) were assessed at baseline and 12 months after intervention. RESULTS: We included a total of 12 patients with anal HSILs. The mean age was 38.6 (± 7.68) years, and 7 (58.3%) were males. Six were HIV positive, 2 had a primary immunodeficiency disease, and 4 were receiving immunosuppressive therapy. A mean of 2.1 anal HSILs per patient were treated. At 12 months, high-resolution anoscopy showed that 7/12 (58.3%) patients had normal high-resolution anoscopy, 3/12 patients had recurrent HSILs, and 2/12 had a persistent lesion. Those lesions were treated with electrocautery, and reached complete response in the following the 6 months (total of 18 months). In particular, there were no metachronous lesions detected. Patients reported moderate to severe pain during the first 24 h after RFA, but only mild discomfort was present at 30 days. Patients were asymptomatic at their 6- and 12-month visits. RFA was not associated with changes in anorectal manometry or ultrasound examination. The 36-SF survey reported improvement in the general health domain (p = 0.038), while the MGH-SFQ showed improvements in sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, targeted plus circumferential RFA had a 58.3% efficacy rate for the treatment of anal HSIL in immunocompromised patients, achieving 100% eradication after adding electrocautery ablation. No metachronous lesions were detected. Patients presented relatively mild symptoms after the procedure, no changes in anorectal anatomy or function, and some improvements in their sexual function. These results seem promising in light of the high recurrence reported after HSIL treatment. Larger studies are needed to validate our results.

Immunosuppressant-induced cutaneous drug reactions in solid organ transplant recipients.

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are susceptible to various cutaneous side effects as a consequence of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Skin cancers and infections are well-studied complications that can cause death and/or allograft rejection. Other cutaneous drug reactions, such as inflammatory manifestations, have a high prevalence but are rarely studied. We analyzed these manifestations' prevalence and their association with immunosuppressants in transplant recipients from a Brazilian tertiary center. Among 532 SOTRs followed at our dermatology clinic, 60 (11.3%) developed some cutaneous adverse reactions to the immunosuppressants, with a median age at transplantation of 50.5 years and a median life span posttransplantation of seven years. Acneiform eruption was the most common drug reaction found (21 patients, 30.4%), followed by diffuse non-scarring alopecia (16 patients, 23.1%), lymphedema (10 patients, 14.5%), gingival hyperplasia (7 patients, 10.1%), hypertrichosis (6 patients, 8.7%) and sebaceous hyperplasia (9 patients, 13.1%). Adequate immunosuppression is an essential prerequisite for successful organ transplantation. In the immediate post-transplant period, significant immunosuppression is needed, but after that, the complications of excessive immunosuppression outweigh the risk of organ rejection. SORTs may present with a broad spectrum of inflammatory and cosmetic findings due to immunosuppressants that can impair life quality.

COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has emerged as a serious threat to public health. Liver transplant (LT) recipients may be at increased risk of acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection and higher morbidity and mortality due to constant contact with health-care services, the use of immunosuppressants and frequent comorbidities. In the first part of this review we discuss (1) the epidemiology and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in LT recipients; (2) the clinical and laboratory features of COVID-19 in this specific population, highlighting differences in presenting signs and symptoms with respect to general populations and (3) the natural history and prognostic factors in LT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19, with particular focus on the possible role of immunosuppression. Thereafter, we review the potential therapeutic options for COVID-19 treatment and prevention. Specifically, we give an overview of current practice in immunosuppressant regimen changes, showing the potential benefits of this strategy, and explore safety and efficacy issues of currently approved drugs in LT recipients. The last topic is dedicated to the potential benefits and pitfalls of vaccination.

Current Practice in Immunosuppression in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

The last decades have witnessed a significant improvement in the field of pediatric liver transplantation (LT), resulting in longer patient and graft survival; adequate graft selection, surgical refinement, the use of live donors and optimal postoperative care are among the reasons why pediatric recipients are living longer. With this new condition, pediatric recipients are now more exposed to the deleterious effects of immunosuppression, including metabolic, infectious and neoplastic complications, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Due to all those particularities, the approach to avoid overimmunosuppression or underimmunosuppression may be more difficult in children than in adult recipients. Moreover, pediatric recipients are exposed to growth issues and specific problems during adolescence, like nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy. This article highlights the current immunosuppressive strategies for pediatric liver transplant recipients.

COVID-19 in solid organ transplantation patients: A systematic review

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) rapidly progresses to severe acute respiratory syndrome. This review aimed at collating available data on COVID-19 infection in solid organ transplantation (SOT) patients. We performed a systematic review of SOT patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The MEDLINE and PubMed databases were electronically searched and updated until April 20, 2020. The MeSH terms used were "COVID-19" AND "Transplant." Thirty-nine COVID-19 cases were reported among SOT patients. The median interval for developing SARS-CoV-2 infection was 4 years since transplantation, and the fatality rate was 25.64% (10/39). Sixteen cases were described in liver transplant (LT) patients, and the median interval since transplantation was 5 years. The fatality rate among LT patients was 37.5% (6/16), with death occurring more than 3 years after LT. The youngest patient who died was 59 years old; there were no deaths among children. Twenty-three cases were described in kidney transplant (KT) patients. The median interval since transplantation was 4 years, and the fatality rate was 17.4% (4/23). The youngest patient who died was 71 years old. Among all transplant patients, COVID-19 had the highest fatality rate in patients older than 60 years : LT, 62.5% vs 12.5% (p=0.006); KT 44.44% vs 0 (p=0.039); and SOT, 52.94% vs 4.54% (p=0.001). This study presents a novel description of COVID-19 in abdominal SOT recipients. Furthermore, we alert medical professionals to the higher fatality risk in patients older than 60 years. (PROSPERO, registration number=CRD42020181299)

Transfer of peanut allergy from donor to recipient after liver transplant.

31 years old female with a history of contact dermatitis, eczema, allergic rhinitis, pernicious anemia, alopecia areata and latent tuberculosis was treated concurrently with methotrexate along with isoniazid and pyridoxine. Five months into the therapy she developed acute onset jaundice progressing into fulminant liver failure with altered mentation and worsening liver function tests. Extensive workup including serological and histopathological evaluation revealed drug-induced liver injury as the etiology of her liver failure and she underwent a successful orthotropic liver transplant. On post-transplant follow-up at four months, she was noted to have an allergic reaction consisting of a perioral rash and swelling (without anaphylaxis) after receiving a kiss from her significant other who had just eaten a peanut butter chocolate. She denied any history of allergic reaction to peanuts prior to the transplant. Percutaneous skin testing revealed immediate hypersensitivity to peanut, hazelnut, and pecan believed to be acquired newly post-transplant. Further investigation revealed that the organ donor had a documented history of systemic anaphylaxis from the peanut allergy and a positive peanut-specific IgE level. Also, another parallel solid organ recipient (lung transplant) from the same organ donor experienced a serious anaphylactic reaction after peanut exposure. This is a case of food (peanut) allergy transfer from the donor to the recipient after the liver transplant. This case highlights the importance of incorporating known donor allergies as a part of pre-transplant screening, given the potentially serious consequences from the transfer of allergies to a previously anergic recipient.

Chikungunya in solid organ transplant recipients, a case series and literature review.

Chikungunya virus is a recent emerging arbovirus in Latin America, and the clinical manifestations can vary from fever and rash to severe chronic inflammatory arthritis. Few reports have been published regarding this infection in immunocompromised patients, including solid organ transplant recipients. We report a case series of solid organ transplant recipients with confirmed Chikungunya infection by positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), identified between January 2014 and December 2016. In addition, we conducted a literature review searching PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS databases on Chikungunya infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Ten solid organ transplant recipients were included, consisting of 5 kidney, 4 liver, and 1 liver/kidney transplant recipient. Mean age of the transplant recipients was 47 years, and the most frequent symptoms of Chikungunya infection were arthralgia and fever. None of the patients required treatment in the intensive care unit, no deaths or graft rejection occurred. None of our patients had recurrent arthritis during 3-month follow-up period after the infection. Twenty-one cases of Chikungunya virus were identified in the literature review. Most cases had a benign clinical course with no severe complications, death, or chronic inflammatory arthritis. In conclusion, Chikungunya infection in solid organ transplant recipients has a benign course and has no chronic recurrent arthritis. It is possible that the immunosuppression regimen could decrease the risk of severe or chronic inflammatory manifestations in solid organ transplant recipients infected with Chikungunya.

Seroprevalence of antibodies against the three serotypes of poliovirus and IPV vaccine response in adult solid organ transplant candidates.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of protective antibody titers to polioviruses in adults candidates for solid organ transplant (SOT), and to assess the immunogenic response to inactivated polio vaccine in this population. METHODS: The study included SOT candidates referred to Immunization Reference Centre of Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases from March 2013 to January 2016. It was conducted in 2 phases. The first one, a cross-sectional seroprevalence study, followed by an uncontrolled analysis of vaccine response among patients without protective antibody titers at baseline. Antibody titers to poliomyelitis were determined by microneutralization assay. RESULTS: Among 206 SOT candidates included, 156 (76%) had protective antibody titers to all poliovirus serotypes (95% CI: 70-81%). Proven history of oral vaccination in childhood was not associated with higher seroprevalence of protective antibody. In 97% of individuals without protective antibody titers at baseline, there was adequate vaccine response with one dose of inactivated polio vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: A relevant proportion of adult candidates for SOT does not have protective titers of antibodies to one or more poliovirus serotype. One dose of inactivated vaccine elicited protective antibody titers in 97% of these subjects and should be routinely prescribed prior to SOT.

Current approaches to visceral leishmaniasis treatment in solid organ transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of transplants performed worldwide and the growing global mobility with migration and travel to and from developing countries and tropical areas are bringing new challenges for the management of transplant infectious diseases, previously less commonly seen, such as Leishmaniasis. However, in this scenario there is a lack of information and the current knowledge is based on a few studies. The selection of the most appropriate treatment depends on various factors, such as patient profile, Leishmania species, disease extent, drug availability, concomitant infections and previous treatments. Therapeutic options may include different formulations of amphotericin B, pentavalent antimonials, miltefosine and paromomycin, among others. These drugs can be used alone or in combination. Areas covered: This review is a practical guide for Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) specific treatment in solid organ transplant recipients (SOT), including therapeutic options and assessment of therapy response. Expert commentary: The main challenges for treatment of leishmaniasis in SOT recipients are related to the duration of therapy, curative criteria and secondary prophylaxis. Immunosuppression dose reduction is often recommended, but such decisions must be made on an individual basis. At present, Liposomal Amphotericin B is the best choice for treatment and prophylaxis.

Aspergillus infection of the larynx in a solid organ transplant recipient.

Primary laryngeal aspergillosis is a rare condition. Only a few cases have been reported in the past years. Most of them have been reported in healthy patients or with a mild immunocompromised state. We report a case of primary laryngeal aspergillosis in a solid organ transplant recipient (SOT), an infection not previously described in this population; we reviewed the published literature in all populations.

Recent advances in the risk factors, diagnosis and management of Epstein-Barr virus post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease / Avances recientes en los factores de riesgo, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad linfoproliferativa post trasplante con infección por virus de Epstein-Barr

Fifty years after the first reports of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated endemic Burkitt's lymphoma, EBV has emerged as the third most prevalent oncogenic virus worldwide. EBV infection is associated with various malignancies including Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, NK/T-cell lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Despite the highly specific immunologic control in the immunocompetent host, EBV can cause severe complications in the immunocompromised host (namely, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease). This is particularly a problem in patients with delayed immune reconstitution post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant or solid organ transplant. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques and treatment algorithms allowing earlier identification and treatment of patients at highest risk, mortality rates remain as high as 90% if not treated early. The cornerstones of treatment include reduction in immunosuppression and in vivo B cell depletion with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. However, these treatment modalities are not always feasible due to graft rejection, emergence of graft vs. host disease, and toxicity. Newer treatment modalities include the use of adoptive T cell therapy, which has shown promising results in various EBV-related malignancies. In this article we will review recent advances in risk factors, diagnosis and management of EBV-associated malignancies, particularly post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. We will also discuss new and innovative treatment options including adoptive T cell therapy as well as management of special situations such as chronic active EBV and EBV-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

A cincuenta años de los primeros reportes de asociación del linfoma de Burkitt con el virus de Epstein-Barr (VEB), el VEB ha emergido como el tercer virus de tipo oncogénico con mayor prevalencia a escala mundial. La infección por VEB se asocia con diversas neoplasias, incluyendo el linfoma de Hodgkin y el no Hodgkin, linfoma de células T/NK y carcinoma nasofaríngeo. A pesar del control inmunológico altamente específico en el huésped inmunocompetente, el VEB puede ocasionar complicaciones severas en el huésped inmunocomprometido (es decir, la enfermedad linfoproliferativa post-trasplante). Esto es un problema particularmente en pacientes en quienes se retrasa la reconstitución de la inmunidad después de un trasplante de células madre hematopoyéticas o un trasplante de órganos sólidos. A pesar de los avances en las técnicas de diagnóstico y los algoritmos de tratamiento que permiten la identificación temprana y el tratamiento de pacientes de alto riesgo, las tasas mortalidad siguen siendo muy altas (del 90%) si no se recibe tratamiento temprano. La piedra angular del tratamiento incluye la disminución de la inmunosupresión y la depleción de células B in vivo con un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CD20. Sin embargo, estas modalidades de tratamiento no son siempre posibles debido al rechazo del injerto, la enfermedad de injerto contra huésped y la toxicidad. Nuevas modalidades de tratamiento incluyen el uso de la terapia adoptiva de células T, que ha mostrado resultados promisorios en diversas neoplasias relacionadas con el VEB. En este artículo se revisan los avances más recientes en cuanto a los factores de riesgo, diagnóstico y tratamiento de las neoplasias asociadas con VEB, particularmente la enfermedad linfoproliferativa post-trasplante. También se discuten los tratamientos más recientes e innovadores, que incluyen la terapia adoptiva de células T así como el manejo de situaciones especiales, como la infección crónica activa de VEB y la linfohistiocitosis hemafagocítica asociada con VEB.