[Practical guidance for the implantation of non-transvenous ICD systems]. / Praktische Anleitung zur Implantation nicht-transvenöser ICD-Systeme.

As an alternative to transvenous ICD systems, two non-transvenous ICD systems have been established in recent years: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD), which has been established for several years, has a presternal electrode that is implanted subcutaneously and offers a shock function and, to a limited extent, post-shock pacing. In addition, the extravascular ICD (EV-ICD) has been available in Europe since 2023 which does not require transvenous electrodes and offers the option of providing patients with antibradycardic and antitachycardic stimulation in combination with a conventional ICD function. The lead of this device is implanted substernally. Initial implantation results are promising in terms of safety and effectiveness. Both systems avoid possible complications of transvenous electrodes. This article provides practical guidance for the implantation technique and possible complications.

Effect of posture on position of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The PRAETORIAN score was developed as an alternative for defibrillation testing after subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation to assess 3 aspects of implant position on a bidirectional chest radiograph. The score is validated on a standard standing chest radiograph with arms elevated in the lateral view. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of different anatomic positions on the PRAETORIAN score. METHODS: Thirty patients with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator underwent standard posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiography, including additional lateral views in 2 positions: standing with arms down and supine with arms alongside the body. PRAETORIAN score and weighted κ coefficient were calculated for each position. RESULTS: In 8 of 30 patients, the PRAETORIAN score was ≥90 in standard position. The agreement in PRAETORIAN score was substantial (κ = 0.677) for the position with the arms down and fair (κ = 0.399) for the supine position. With the arms down, the PRAETORIAN score decreased in 10 patients (33%), 4 of whom changed to a lower risk category. In supine position, the PRAETORIAN score decreased in 16 patients (53%), 7 of whom changed to a lower risk category, 1 from high to low risk. CONCLUSION: A supine or arms-down position during chest radiography can result in lower PRAETORIAN scores and underestimation of associated risk on defibrillation testing failure. This emphasizes the importance of correct anatomic positioning (arms up) during chest radiography when the PRAETORIAN score is used.

Trends in adoption of extravascular cardiac implantable electronic devices: the Dutch cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and pacemakers carry a risk of pocket- and lead-related complications in particular. To avoid these complications, extravascular devices (EVDs) have been developed, such as the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and leadless pacemaker (LP). However, data on patient or centre characteristics related to the actual adoption of EVDs are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess real-world nationwide trends in EVD adoption in the Netherlands. METHODS: Using the Netherlands Heart Registration, all consecutive patients with a de novo S­ICD or conventional single-chamber ICD implantation between 2012-2020, or de novo LP or conventional single-chamber pacemaker implantation between 2014-2020 were included. Trends in adoption are described for various patient and centre characteristics. RESULT: From 2012-2020, 2190 S­ICDs and 10,683 conventional ICDs were implanted; from 2014-2020, 712 LPs and 11,103 conventional pacemakers were implanted. The general use has increased (S-ICDs 8 to 21%; LPs 1 to 8%), but this increase seems to have reached a plateau. S­ICD recipients were younger than conventional ICD recipients (p < 0.001) and more often female (p < 0.001); LP recipients were younger than conventional pacemaker recipients (p < 0.001) and more often male (p = 0.03). Both S­ICDs and LPs were mainly implanted in high-volume centres with cardiothoracic surgery on-site, although over time S­ICDs were increasingly implanted in centres without cardiothoracic surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This nationwide study demonstrated a relatively quick adoption of innovative EVDs with a plateau after approximately 4 years. S­ICD use is especially high in younger patients. EVDs are mainly implanted in high-volume centres with cardiothoracic surgery back-up, but S­ICD use is expanding beyond those centres.

Decision-making regarding subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention in patients with low ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Conventional transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) is the standard device used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nonetheless its use is associated with lead-related complications including infection and malfunction. A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) offers an alternative option without the need for a transvenous lead but has limitations. The decision to implant a TV-ICD or S-ICD in patients with impaired LVEF for primary prevention of SCD is controversial. Several randomised controlled trials and large observational studies have confirmed similar safety and efficacy of S-ICDs and TV-ICDs in such population. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to compare the outcomes of subcutaneous (S-ICD) versus transvenous (TV-ICD) implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles. Studies were selected based on relevance and quality. Key outcomes like complication rates, efficacy, and patient survival were summarized in a comparative table. RESULTS: Different factors that influence the choice between an TV-ICD and S-ICD for primary prevention of SCD in patients with LVEF are highlighted to guide selection of the appropriate device in different patient populations. Moreover, future perspective on the combination of SICD with leadless pacemaker, and the latest development of the extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: S-ICD offers a safe and efficacious option to primary prevention in reduced ejection fraction. Future development including incorporation of leadless pacemaker will add to the arsenal of choice to protect patients from sudden cardiac death.

Electromagnetic force from electric vehicles: Potential electromagnetic interference source for subcutaneous implantable defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic interference (EMI) encompasses electromagnetic field signals that can be detected by a device's circuitry, potentially resulting in adverse effects such as inaccurate sensing, pacing, device mode switching, and defibrillation. EMI may impact the functioning of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) and lead to inappropriate therapy. METHOD: An experimental measuring device, a loop antenna mimicking the implantable cardioverted defibrillator (ICD) antenna, was developed, and validated at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and sent to Wright State University for testing. Two sets of measurements were conducted while the vehicle was connected to a 220-Volt outlet with charging at ON and OFF. Each measurement set involved three readings at various locations, with the antenna oriented in three different positions to account for diverse patient postures. The experiment utilized a Tesla Model 3 electric vehicle (EV), assessing scenarios both inside and outside the car, including the driver's seat, driver's seat floor, passenger's seat, rear seat, rear seat floor, cup holder, charging port (car), and near the charging station. RESULTS: The detected voltage (max 400 to 504 millivolts) around the cup holder inside the car differed from all other measurement scenarios. CONCLUSION: The investigation highlights the identification of EMI signals originating from an EV) that could potentially interrupt the functionality of a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (S-ICD). These signals fell within the R-wave Spectrum of 30-300 Hz. Further in-vivo studies are essential to determine accurately the level of interference between S-ICDs and EMI from Electric Vehicles.

Two cases of silent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrode displacement.

We describe two cases of secondary prevention subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation and subsequent S-ICD electrode displacement which initially went undetected. One presentation was a result of a coincidental chest x-ray for respiratory exacerbation and another with an untreated episode highlighted via remote monitoring, both patients were booked to clinic for further investigation. Our findings highlighted had there been a comparison of the existing subcutaneous electrogram (S-ECG) to captured S-ECGs at time of implant the electrode displacement would have been detected beforehand. This underpins the importance of introducing the simple management strategy into routine follow-up.

Fifteen years of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: Where do we stand, and what will the future hold?

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has emerged as a feasible alternative to the transvenous ICD in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients without indications for pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy. Since its introduction, numerous innovations have been made and clinical experience has been gained, leading to its adoption in current practice and preference in certain populations. Moreover, emerging technologies like the extravascular ICD and the combination of the S-ICD with the leadless pacemaker offer new possibilities for the future. These advancements underscore the evolving role of the S-ICD in management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This review outlines implantation considerations, patient selection, and troubleshooting advancements in the last 15 years and provides insights into future perspectives.

Complicaciones y descargas inapropiadas tras el implante de un desfibrilador subcutáneo en pacientes pediátricos / Complications and inappropriate shocks in pediatric patients receiving a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrilator

Introducción y objetivos: La experiencia con el desfibrilador automático implantable subcutáneo (DAI-SC) en pacientes pediátricos aún es reducida. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la incidencia de complicaciones en pacientes pediátricos de nuestro centro en función del tipo de DAI y del tamaño del paciente.MétodosSe incluyó a pacientes menores de 18 años que recibieron un DAI-SC desde 2016 y pacientes contemporáneos (desde 2014) que recibieron un DAI transvenoso (DAI-TV). El evento principal fue el combinado de complicaciones y descargas inapropiadas.ResultadosSe implantó un DAI-SC a 26 pacientes (edad, 14 [intervalo, 5-17] años; índice de masa corporal [IMC], 20,2). De ellos, 23 (88%) fueron implantes intermusculares y el resto, en subserrato, 24 (92%) con 2 incisiones. Se programaron 2 zonas en todos los pacientes: condicional a 230 (220-230) lpm y de choque a 250 lpm. El grupo de DAI-TV incluyó a 19 pacientes (edad, 11 [5-16] años; IMC, 19,2; el 79% monocamerales). La supervivencia libre del evento principal a 5 años fue el 80% de los pacientes con DAI-SC y el 63% del grupo con DAI-TV (p=0,54); la de descargas inapropiadas fue similar (el 85 frente al 89%; p=0,86), mientras que la de complicaciones fue mayor en el grupo de DAI-SC (el 96 frente al 57%; cloglog p=0.016). En el grupo de DAI-SC no hubo fallo de la terapia ni mayores complicaciones con un IMC ≤ 20.ConclusionesCon las técnicas de implante y programación actuales, el DAI-SC es eficaz y seguro en pacientes pediátricos, con similares descargas inapropiadas y menos complicaciones a corto y medio plazo que el DAI-TV. (AU)

Introduction and objectives: There is limited evidence regarding the use of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of complications in these patients at our center, according to the type of ICD and patient size.MethodsWe included all patients aged<18 years who received an S-ICD since 2016 at our center. As a control group, we also included contemporary patients (since 2014) who received a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). The primary endpoint was a composite of complications and inappropriate shocks.ResultsA total of 26 patients received an S-ICD (median age, 14 [5-17] years; body mass index [BMI], 20.2 kg/m2). Implantation was intermuscular in 23 patients (88%) and subserratus in the remainder. Two incisions were used in 24 patients (92%). In all patients, 2 zones were programmed: a conditional zone set at 230 (220-230) bpm, and a shock zone set at 250 bpm. Nineteen patients received a TV-ICD (median age, 11 [range, 5-16] years; BMI, 19.2 kg/m2, 79% single-chamber). Survival free from the primary endpoint at 5 years was 80% in the S-ICD group and 63% in the TV-ICD group (P=.54). Survival free from inappropriate shocks was similar (85% vs 89%, P=.86), while survival free from complications was higher in the S-ICD group (96% vs 57%, cloglogP=.016). There were no therapy failures in the S-ICD group, and no increased complication rates were observed in patients with BMI ≤ 20 kg/m2.ConclusionsWith contemporary implantation techniques and programming, S-ICD is a safe and effective therapy in pediatric patients. The number of inappropriate shocks is similar to TV-ICD, with fewer short- and mid-term complications. (AU)

Sex-based outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and impact of surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: Because of differences in chest wall anatomy, female patients may have higher rates of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) pocket-related complications. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate sex-based outcomes after S-ICD implantation. METHODS: Patients implanted with an S-ICD at Emory Healthcare between 2010 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Patients' clinical characteristics and post-S-ICD implantation complications were collected. RESULTS: There were 429 male patients (68%) and 199 female patients (32%) observed for a median duration of 2.3 years (0.6-4.4 years). Male and female patients had comparable rates of diabetes (28%), end-stage renal disease (29.5%), ejection fraction (30.2% ± 13.4%), and body mass index (29.1 ± 6.6 kg/m2). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of shocks between men and women (26.3% vs 20.1%; P = .09), including appropriate shocks (14.7% vs 12%; P = .98) and inappropriate shocks (11.7% vs 9.5%; P = .98). Pocket-related complications occurred in 21 patients; these included pocket infection (n = 12), wound dehiscence (n = 7), and hematoma requiring drainage (n = 2). Female patients had a significantly higher pocket-related complication rate compared with male patients (7.2% vs 2.5%; P = .016). In controlling for age, body mass index, diabetes, and end-stage renal disease, female patients had higher odds of pocket-related complications compared with male patients (odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-7.75). Pocket-related complications decreased after 2018 compared with before 2018 (6% vs 2.6%, P = .052), mainly driven by reduction in complications in women (12.3% vs 3.2%; P = .034) but not in men (2.8% vs 2.4%; P = 1). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of S-ICD patients, women had a higher rate of post-S-ICD pocket-related complications that could be explained by sex-based differences in anatomy.

Safety of Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (SPORT S-ICD): study rationale and protocol.

Background: Recent studies suggest that participation in recreational and even competitive sports is generally safe for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, these studies included only patients with implanted transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). Nowadays, subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a safe and effective alternative and is increasingly implanted in younger ICD candidates. Data on the safety of sport participation for patients with implanted S-ICD systems is urgently needed. Objectives: The goal of the study is to quantify the risks (or determine the safety) of sports participation for athletes with an S-ICD, which will guide shared decision making for athletes requiring an ICD and/or wishing to return to sports after implantation. Methods: The SPORT S-ICD (Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) study is an international, multicenter, prospective, noninterventional, observational study, designed specifically to collect data on the safety of sports participation among patients with implanted S-ICD systems who regularly engage in sports activities. Results: A total of 450 patients will undergo baseline assessment including baseline characteristics, indication for S-ICD implantation, arrhythmic history, S-ICD data and programming, and data regarding sports activities. LATITUDE Home Monitoring information will be regularly transferred to the study coordinator for analysis. Conclusion: The results of the study will aid in shaping clinical decision making, and if the tested hypothesis will be proven, it will allow the safe continuation of sports for patients with an implanted S-ICD.

Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carriers: a multicentre, international analysis from the iSUSI project.

AIMS: Catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has become an important tool to improve clinical outcomes in patients with appropriate transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. The aim of our analysis was to test whether VT ablation (VTA) impacts long-term clinical outcomes even in subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) carriers. METHODS AND RESULTS: International Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (iSUSI) registry patients who experienced either an ICD shock or a hospitalization for monomorphic VT were included in this analysis. Based on an eventual VTA after the index event, patients were divided into VTA+ vs. VTA- cohorts. Primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of a combination of device-related appropriate shocks, monomorphic VTs, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were addressed individually. Among n = 1661 iSUSI patients, n = 211 were included: n = 177 experiencing ICD shocks and n = 34 hospitalized for VT. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed. Both the crude and the yearly event rate of the primary outcome (5/59 and 3.8% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 41/152 and 16.4% yearly event rate in the VTA-; log-rank: P value = 0.0013) and the cardiovascular mortality (1/59 and 0.7% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 13/152 and 4.7% yearly event rate VTA-; log-rank P = 0.043) were significantly lower in the VTA + cohort. At multivariate analysis, VTA was the only variable remaining associated with a lower incidence of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio 0.262 (0.100-0.681), P = 0.006]. CONCLUSION: In a real-world registry of S-ICD carriers, the combined study endpoint of arrhythmic events and cardiovascular mortality was lower in the patient cohort undergoing VTA at long-term follow-up. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT0473876.

Postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia improves pain management after subcutaneous implantable defibrillator implantation.

Objective: Postoperative pain is a major issue with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD). In 2020, we introduced intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) in addition to the conventional, request-based analgesia for postoperative pain control in S-ICD. To determine the effect and safety, we quantitatively assessed the effect of IV-PCA after S-ICD surgery over conventional methods. Methods: During the study period, a total of 113 consecutive patients (age, 50.1 ± 15.5 years: males, 101) underwent a de novo S-ICD implantation under general anesthesia. While the postoperative pain was addressed with either request-based analgesia (by nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, N = 68, dubbed as "PCA absent") or fentanyl-based IV-PCA in addition to the standard care (N = 45, dubbed as "PCA present"). The degree of postoperative pain from immediately after surgery to 1 week were retrospectively investigated by the numerical rating scale (NRS) divided into four groups at rest and during activity (0: no pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain). Results: Although IV-PCA was removed on Day 1, it was associated with continued better pain control compared to PCA absent group. At rest, the proportion of patients expressing pain (mild or more) was significantly lower in the PCA present group from Day 0 to Day 4. In contrast to at rest, a better pain control continued through the entire study period of 7 days. No serious adverse events were observed. A few patients experienced nausea in both groups and the inter-group difference was not found significant. Conclusion: IV-PCA suppresses postoperative pain in S-ICD without major safety concerns.

Predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for defibrillation test success in patients with subcutaneous ICD: A subanalysis of the PRAETORIAN-DFT trial.

BACKGROUND: The PRAETORIAN score estimates the risk of failure of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) therapy by using generator and lead positioning on bidirectional chest radiographs. The PRospective randomized compArative trial of subcutanEous implanTable cardiOverter-defibrillatoR ImplANtation with and without DeFibrillation Testing (PRAETORIAN-DFT) investigates whether PRAETORIAN score calculation is noninferior to defibrillation testing (DFT) with regard to first shock efficacy in spontaneous events. OBJECTIVE: This prespecified subanalysis assessed the predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for defibrillation success in induced ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: This multicenter investigator-initiated trial randomized 965 patients between DFT and PRAETORIAN score calculation after de novo S-ICD implantation. Successful DFT was defined as conversion of induced ventricular arrhythmia in <5 seconds from shock delivery within 2 attempts. Bidirectional chest radiographs were obtained after implantation. The predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for DFT success was calculated for patients in the DFT arm. RESULTS: In total, 482 patients were randomized to undergo DFT. Of these patients, 457 (95%) underwent DFT according to protocol, of whom 445 (97%) had successful DFT and 12 (3%) had failed DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 had a positive predictive value of 25% for failed DFT, and a PRAETORIAN score of <90 had a negative predictive value of 99% for successful DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 was the strongest independent predictor for failed DFT (odds ratio 33.77; confidence interval 6.13-279.95; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A PRAETORIAN score of <90 serves as a reliable indicator for DFT success in patients with S-ICD, and a PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 is a strong predictor for DFT failure.

Intra-Abdominal Hemorrhage Triggering Inappropriate Therapy From a Subcutaneous Defibrillator.

The SMART Pass filter (Boston Scientific) aims to reduce inappropriate shocks (IASs) from subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators by filtering out low-frequency signals such as T waves. However, this filter is deactivated in the presence of diminished R-wave sensing. We describe a case of IAS in the setting of extensive intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

Ten years of subcutaneous defibrillator therapy: Consolidated clinical evidence and future perspectives.

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed as an alternative to the traditional transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (TV-ICD), aiming to provide easier implantation, simplified detection algorithm of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and prevention from placing components in the cardiovascular system. The S-ICD is implanted subcutaneously or intramuscularly with the generator placed in the left midaxillary line and the lead tunneled subcutaneously in the left para-sternal region. Preimplant electrocardiogram screening is recommended to prevent implantation in patients at high risk of T wave over-sensing. Currently, the S-ICD is unsuitable for patients requiring pacing or cardiac resynchronization. Since the beginning, the S-ICD underwent extensive preclinical investigation until the first prospective multicentre trial demonstrating high efficacy and safety led to market release. While earlier studies focused on younger patients with higher ejection fraction, more recent studies showed favorable outcomes even in patients with comorbidities similar to those typically observed in patients receiving TV-ICD. The development of second and third generation devices has contributed to reduce inappropriate shocks and overcome previous limitations. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence in the literature over the past decade supporting S-ICD as a valid alternative to TV-ICD in terms of safety and efficacy, highlighting the improvements in technology, as well as outcomes.

Defibrillation threshold in elective subcutaneous implantable defibrillator generator replacements: Time to reduce the size of the pulse generator?

INTRODUCTION: The first step-down defibrillation studies in the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) described a defibrillation threshold (DFT) of 32.5 ± 17.0 J and 36.6 ± 19.8 J. Therefore, the default shock output of the S-ICD was set at 80 J. In de novo implants, the DFT is lower in optimally positioned S-ICDs. However, a retrospective analysis raised concerns about a high DFT in S-ICD replacements, possibly related to fibrosis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to find the DFT in patients undergoing S-ICD generator replacement. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who underwent S-ICD generator replacement with subsequent defibrillation testing. A pre-specified defibrillation testing protocol was used to determine the DFT, defined as the lowest shock output that effectively terminated the induced ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were enrolled, 6.0 ± 2.1 years after initial implant. Mean DFT during replacement in the total cohort was 27.4 ± 14.3 J. In patients with a body mass index (BMI) 18.5-25 kg/m2 (N = 22, BMI 22.5 ± 1.6), median DFT was 20 J (IQR 17.5-30). In 18/22 patients, the DFT was ≤30 J and 5/22 patients were successfully defibrillated at 10 J. One patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had a DFT of 65 J. In patients with a BMI >25 kg/m2 (N = 23, BMI 29.5 ± 4.2), median DFT was 30 J (IQR 20-40). In 15/23 patients, the DFT was ≤30 J and 4/23 patients had a successful defibrillation test at 10 J. CONCLUSIONS: This study eases concerns about a high DFT after S-ICD generator replacement. The majority of patients had a DFT ≤30 J, regardless of BMI, suggesting that the shock output of the S-ICD could be safely reduced.

Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Shocks-A Rare Case of Triple Counting.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) caused by ventricular tachyarrhythmias is a significant contributor to cardiovascular deaths worldwide. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have shown efficacy in preventing and reducing mortality from SCD, but traditional transvenous ICDs have inherent challenges and drawbacks, such as lead fractures, lead-associated endocarditis, and lead failure. To address these issues, subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) have been developed. S-ICDs lack pacing capacity but are a valid alternative for patients at high risk for infection or with difficult venous access. Pre-implantation screening can help prevent inappropriate device shocks. We present a case in which a patient received inappropriate S-ICD therapy, which was attributed to the triple counting of P-, R-, and T-waves in a patient with sinus rhythm. This is an unusual occurrence, and, to the best of our knowledge, there are only a limited number of case reports documenting inappropriate shocks due to the oversensing of P-waves and T-waves.

Complications and inappropriate shocks in pediatric patients receiving a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrilator.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is limited evidence regarding the use of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of complications in these patients at our center, according to the type of ICD and patient size. METHODS: We included all patients aged<18 years who received an S-ICD since 2016 at our center. As a control group, we also included contemporary patients (since 2014) who received a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). The primary endpoint was a composite of complications and inappropriate shocks. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients received an S-ICD (median age, 14 [5-17] years; body mass index [BMI], 20.2 kg/m2). Implantation was intermuscular in 23 patients (88%) and subserratus in the remainder. Two incisions were used in 24 patients (92%). In all patients, 2 zones were programmed: a conditional zone set at 230 (220-230) bpm, and a shock zone set at 250 bpm. Nineteen patients received a TV-ICD (median age, 11 [range, 5-16] years; BMI, 19.2 kg/m2, 79% single-chamber). Survival free from the primary endpoint at 5 years was 80% in the S-ICD group and 63% in the TV-ICD group (P=.54). Survival free from inappropriate shocks was similar (85% vs 89%, P=.86), while survival free from complications was higher in the S-ICD group (96% vs 57%, cloglog P=.016). There were no therapy failures in the S-ICD group, and no increased complication rates were observed in patients with BMI ≤20 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: With contemporary implantation techniques and programming, S-ICD is a safe and effective therapy in pediatric patients. The number of inappropriate shocks is similar to TV-ICD, with fewer short- and mid-term complications.

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease.

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) are being used with increased frequency in children and patients with congenital heart disease. Vascular access complexities, intracardiac shunts, and specific anatomies make these devices particularly appealing for some of these patients. Alternative screening, implantation, and programming techniques should be considered based on patient size, body habitus, anatomy, procedural history, and preference. Appropriate and inappropriate shock rates are generally comparable to those seen with transvenous devices. Complications such as infection can occur, although their severity is likely to be less than that seen with transvenous devices. Technical advances are likely to further broaden S-ICD applicability.