Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Complex Stone Disease?

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the gold standard treatment for large, complex intrarenal stones. Historically, this was performed using a nephrostomy tube (PCN) and/or internalized ureteral stent at the end of the procedure. However, totally tubeless nephrolithotomy (tt-PCNL) is a novel technique where no tubes (no stent nor nephrostomy tube) are left post-operatively. We review the literature on this subject regarding peri-operative outcomes, post-operative outcomes, and potential complications of the procedure, discuss our technique, and make recommendations on implementation for centers not currently utilizing the procedure. Materials and methods: We performed a comprehensive search of the literature on totally tubeless nephrolithotomy using MEDLINE database search. Our search included prior review articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, primary research articles, case reports, and case studies. Results: In comparison to prior approaches where a stent or nephrostomy tube is placed, tt-PCNL has a similar complication rate and better post-operative outcomes. Totally tubeless PCNL has similar operative times and similar changes in hemoglobin. However, it had shorter length of stays across all studies. The mean difference in length of stay in the studies reviewed was 1.96 days. Additionally, tt-PCNL had decreased post-operative analgesic requirements and pain scores. Conclusions: This review highlights totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a safe and feasible surgical technique with improved outcomes in properly selected patients.

Comparison of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety and advantages of the total tubeless (TT) percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and standard PCNL in the supine position. METHODS: This study was carried out at Izmir Tepecik Health Application and Research Center. A total of 87 patients were examined. Forty-three patients who underwent TT procedure were defined as Group 1, and 44 patients who underwent standard procedure with a nephrostomy tube were defined as Group 2. Two techniques were evaluated with demographic data and outcome parameters. Univariate regression analyses were performed in these data sets for the parameters that predicted the TT procedure. RESULTS: The demographic data of the groups and all characteristics of the stones were similar. When the results were examined, the stone-free rates detected by non-contrast computed tomography (CT) in the postoperative 1st month were similar between the groups. Complication rates and secondary intervention rates were similar. Operation and fluoroscopy times were shorter in group 1, which were not statistically significant. Postoperative hemoglobin decreased, and creatinine values were similar. In Group 1, mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the percentage of VAS reporting > 5 points for pain level measurement were lower and statistically significant. In the univariate analysis of the factors predicting the TT procedure, no significant results were found in any parameter. CONCLUSION: Performing TT PCNL in the supine position in selected patients reduces postoperative pain without affecting the complication rates as in prone PCNL. Our study is the first to compare TT and standard PCNL in supine position.

A retrospective cohort study: evaluating the efficacy of standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in pediatric patients up to 18 years old.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an endourological method applied as the standard or tubeless method for kidney stone treatment. In a retrospective cohort study, 88 surgery units involving 75 children up to 18 years old with kidney stones who underwent the surgery for 8 years in Shahid Beheshti and Boo-ali hospitals in Hamadan with one of the two methods of standard or tubeless PCNL were evaluated and compared considering the success rate of operation, hemoglobin, hematocrit drop, need for medications, need for blood transfusion, duration of surgery, and the length of hospital stay. Among the 88 units studied, 47 cases were operated with the standard PCNL and 41 cases by tubeless method. In children operated by standard and tubeless PCNL, the complete success rate of operation was 87.2% and 100% (P = 0.006), the need for blood transfusion was 2.1% and 0% (P = 1.00), the need for opioids was 27.7% and 14.6% (P = 0.134), the decrease in hemoglobin was - 1.82 ± 0.94 and -1.30 ± 0.98 mg/dl (P = 0.024), the decrease in hematocrit was - 5.40 ± 2.66 and -3.52 ± 3.11 mg/dL (P = 0.003), the mean surgery duration was 109.30 ± 53.27 and 101.46 ± 31.92 min (P = 0.414), the duration of postoperative hospitalization was 3.38 ± 1.76 and 2.46 ± 1.27 days (P = 0.007), and the frequency of fever was 23.4% and 7.3% (P = 0.04), respectively. The success rate of kidney stone surgery in children with the tubeless PCNL is higher than the standard method, and its complications are lower.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of tubeless vs. conventional mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with Escherichia coli bacteriuria.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteriuria. We conducted a retrospective review of 84 patients with E. coli bacteriuria who underwent PCNL. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether a nephrostomy tube is placed at the end of the procedure. Preoperative clinical data, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were compared. Then, regression analysis of factors predicting success rate of PCNL in patients with E. coli bacteriuria was performed. After PCNL, residual fragments ≤ 4 mm were considered as success. At baseline, the two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, BMI, underlying disease, hydronephrosis, stone characteristics, and urinalysis. Postoperative fever occurred in 1 patient (3.8%) in the tubeless PCNL group, and in 5 patients (8.6%) in the conventional PCNL group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of successful rate, decrease in hemoglobin, pain scores, blood transfusion, and hospitalization expenses. However, the tubeless PCNL group had significantly shorter operative time (60 vs. 70 min, p = 0.033), indwelling time of catheter (2 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), and hospital stays (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001) than the conventional PCNL group. In the analysis of factors predicting success, the stone diameter, stone burden, and operative time were associated with success rate of PCNL. It is safe and effective to perform tubeless PCNL in patients with E. coli bacteriuria. Compared to conventional PCNL, tubeless PCNL accelerates patient recovery and shortens hospital stays.

Comparison between a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system and a tubeless, on-body sensor-augmented pump in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study compares the efficacy and safety of a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery (AID) system with that of a tubeless, on-body sensor-augmented pump (SAP). METHODS: This multicentre, parallel-group, RCT was conducted at 13 tertiary medical centres in South Korea. Adults aged 19-69 years with type 1 diabetes who had HbA1c levels of <85.8 mmol/mol (<10.0%) were eligible. The participants were assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a tubeless, on-body AID system (intervention group) or a tubeless, on-body SAP (control group) for 12 weeks. Stratified block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Blinding was not possible due to the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in range (TIR), blood glucose between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/l, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. ANCOVAs were conducted with baseline values and study centres as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants underwent randomisation, with 53 in the intervention group and 51 in the control group. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 40±11 years. The mean (±SD) TIR increased from 62.1±17.1% at baseline to 71.5±10.7% over the 12 week trial period in the intervention group and from 64.7±17.0% to 66.9±15.0% in the control group (difference between the adjusted means: 6.5% [95% CI 3.6%, 9.4%], p<0.001). Time below range, time above range, CV and mean glucose levels were also significantly better in the intervention group compared with the control group. HbA1c decreased from 50.9±9.9 mmol/mol (6.8±0.9%) at baseline to 45.9±7.4 mmol/mol (6.4±0.7%) after 12 weeks in the intervention group and from 48.7±9.1 mmol/mol (6.6±0.8%) to 45.7±7.5 mmol/mol (6.3±0.7%) in the control group (difference between the adjusted means: -0.7 mmol/mol [95% CI -2.0, 0.8 mmol/mol] (-0.1% [95% CI -0.2%, 0.1%]), p=0.366). No diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The use of a tubeless, on-body AID system was safe and associated with superior glycaemic profiles, including TIR, time below range, time above range and CV, than the use of a tubeless, on-body SAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) KCT0008398 FUNDING: The study was funded by a grant from the Korea Medical Device Development Fund supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT; the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy; the Ministry of Health and Welfare; and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (grant number: RS-2020-KD000056).

Ureteral stent after PCNL: is leaving the threads through the percutaneous tract safe and better tolerated?

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, urinary symptoms, and feasibility of JJ stent removal with exteriorized threads through the percutaneous tract after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, transversal, comparative, experimental, randomized 1-to-1 cohort study in 52 patients who underwent "tubeless" PCNL from October 2020 to November 2022. Group A with threads through the urethra and Group B through the percutaneous tract. The validated USSQ (Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire) was applied in the Urology office a week after the procedure, and the JJ stent was withdrawn by pulling the threads. Hemoglobin and urine culture, and pre- and post-surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference in favor of group B when comparing urinary symptoms (p = 0.008), body pain (p = 0.009), and general condition (p = 0.042), mainly for non-urgency incontinence, frequency of analgesic use, and dysuria. There were significant differences between groups (p = 0.028, p = 0.026, p = 0.027, respectively). There is no association with urinary infections (p = 0.603) nor an increased risk of bleeding (p = 0.321). CONCLUSION: The removal of the JJ stent with exteriorized threads through the percutaneous tract after PCNL in the office is a feasible and safe procedure if it is removed before 8 days and has better tolerance regarding the urinary symptoms.

Real-world outcomes of Omnipod DASH system use in people with type 1 diabetes: Evidence from the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) study.

AIMS: To evaluate real-world outcomes in people with Type 1 Diabetes (PwT1D) initiated on Omnipod DASH® Insulin Management System. METHODS: Anonymized clinical data were submitted to a secure web-based tool within the National Health Service network. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), sensor-derived glucometrics, total daily dose of insulin (TDD), and patient-reported outcome changes between baseline and follow-up were assessed. Individuals were classified to "new-to-pump" (switched from multiple daily injections) and "established-on-pump" (switched from a tethered insulin pump) groups. RESULTS: 276 individuals from 11 centers [66.7 % female; 92 % White British; median age 41 years (IQR 20-50); diabetes duration 20 years (IQR 11-31); 49.3 % within "new-to-pump" group] were included. Baseline HbA1c was 8.0 ± 1.3 % (64 ± 14 mmol/mol). At follow-up [3 years (IQR 1.5-3.2)], HbA1c reduced by 0.3 % [(3 mmol/mol); p = 0.002] across the total population, 0.4 % [(5 mmol/mol); p = 0.001] in those "new-to-pump" and remained unchanged in those "established-on-pump". TDD decreased in the "new-to-pump" cohort (baseline:44.9 ± 21.0units vs follow-up:38.1 ± 15.4units, p = 0.002). Of those asked, 141/143 (98.6 %) stated Omnipod DASH had a positive impact on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Omnipod DASH was associated with improvements in HbA1c in PwT1D "new-to-pump" and maintained previous HbA1c levels in those "established-on-pump". User satisfaction in all groups and TDD reduction in those "new-to-pump" were reported.

Treatment satisfaction with Omnipod DASH in adults with type 1 diabetes: A non-blinded 1:1 randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We compared treatment satisfaction with a tubeless insulin pump (Omnipod DASH® Insulin Management System) to usual care (multiple daily injections [MDI] or tubed insulin pump therapy [IPT]) in adults with type 1 diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults with type 1 diabetes on MDI (n = 40) or IPT (n = 25) from four diabetes centers in Australia were randomized in a 1:1 non-blinded manner to Omnipod DASH System (Omnipod group) or continue usual care (Usual Care group) for 12 weeks, followed by a further 12-week extension where all participants used the device. The primary outcome was treatment satisfaction assessed by change in Diabetes Technology Questionnaire 'current' (ΔDTQ-current) score at 12-weeks (study-end). Secondary outcomes included ΔDTQ-current following extension and other participant-reported outcomes (PROs) measuring quality of life, burden of disease treatment, glycemic and device-related outcomes at 12-weeks (study-end) and 24-weeks (end-extension). RESULTS: Treatment satisfaction improved more in Omnipod group vs. Usual Care group (ΔDTQ-current score of 16.4 [21.2] vs. 0.0 [12.8]; p < 0.001) at study-end. Significantly greater improvements in other PROs and HbA1c were also observed. Improvements in DTQ-current and other PROs comparing study-end and end-extension were similar. While %TIR change from baseline did not differ at study-end (-2.0 [12.7] %), it was significantly greater at end-extension (5.6 [10.9] %; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Omnipod DASH System resulted in greater treatment satisfaction at 12 weeks in adults with type 1 diabetes using SMBG which was sustained after 24 weeks of device use without compromising sleep quality and fear of hypoglycemia. Improvements in glycemia were also observed.

Complications of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: The necessity of nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been called into question in modern series. We sought to examine differences in postoperative complications and outcomes of tubeless PCNL versus standard PCNL at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional stone database was conducted from January 2016 to December 2021 for patients who had undergone either tubeless PCNL, defined by placement of only an internal ureteral stent, or standard PCNL, which involved placement of an externalized nephrostomy tube. Patients were excluded if they underwent totally tubeless PCNL. RESULTS: A total of 438 patients were included for analysis: 329 patients underwent tubeless PCNL and 109 patients underwent standard PCNL. Between tubeless and standard groups, there was no difference in readmission rates 6.1% vs. 9.2% (p = 0.268), Clavien 2 or > complications 18.5% vs. 19.3% (p = 0.923), and Clavien 3 or > complications 4.0% vs. 7.3% (p = 0.151). The tubeless group experienced shorter operative duration 121.5 vs. 144.8 min (p = 0.012), shorter length of stay 2.5 vs. 3.8 days (p = 0.002), and higher stone-free rates 72.3% vs. 60.2% (p = 0.014), but also increased blood transfusion rates 6.4% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: In comparing tubeless with standard PCNL, there was no difference in readmission rates, or significant Clavien complication rates. Patients undergoing tubeless PCNL experienced higher stone-free rates, but more number of patients required postoperative blood transfusion. The decision to leave a nephrostomy tube after PCNL appears unlikely to impact overall complication rates and can be left to surgeon experience and case-based discretion.

Tubeless PCNL versus standard PCNL for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: In this study, the feasibility of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones was investigated. METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2022, the clinical data of 273 patients who received tubeless PCNL (Group A) were studied. The control group includes clinical data from 302 patients (from January 2019 to October 2022) who received standard PCNL (Group B). The baseline characteristics were consistent between the two groups after using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. Compare the preoperative clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, residual stones, catheterization time, and hospital stay between the two groups. RESULTS: 146 pairs of patients were successfully paired through PSM. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time, blood leukocyte counts, haemoglobin decrease, fever, urinary extravasation, sepsis, bleeding, blood transfusion rates, embolism, and residual stones after surgery between the two groups; Postoperative day 1 and discharge day, the VAS pain score in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B. The catheterization time and hospitalization time of patients in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B. CONCLUSION: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, selecting suitable patients for tubeless PCNL is safe and effective, while significantly alleviating pain and reducing catheterization time and hospital stay.

A Comparative Analysis between Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of >15 mm Non-Obstructing Proximal Ureteral Stones.

BACKGROUND: The proper surgical modality for large non-obstructing proximal ureteral stones is disputed. We compare effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPNL) in treatment of upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who performed FURL or TPNL for upper ureteral stones between June 2016 and November 2018. Comparative analysis was conducted regarding demographic parameters, stone free rate, postoperative pain and complications. RESULTS: This study included 58 patients treated with FURL and 60 patients treated with TPNL owing to upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. Stone size was similar in the FURL and TPNL groups (17.6 ± 2.6 vs. 18.0 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.194). The overall 3-month stone clearance rate was 95.8% for FURL versus 96.0% for TPNL (p = 0.575). There was no difference between the FURL and TPNL groups for hospital stay (p = 0.280) and postoperative complications. On the other hand, patients treated with FURL had longer operative time (p = 0.012) and less postoperative pain (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques were considered feasible and effective surgical procedures in the treatment of large upper ureteral stones.

[The efficiency of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: analysis of 40 cases].

INTRODUCTION: Previously, the placement of a nephrostomy tube was considered standard practice during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) to ensure repeat access and kidney assessment. However, some publications have shown that in certain cases, a totally tubeless approach may be a viable alternative, provided that PCNL is performed properly and safely. AIM: To analyze the results and complications of totally tubeless PCNL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 40 patients with renal stones who underwent totally tubeless PCNL using a single percutaneous access of 16 Ch or 26 Ch at the urology department of NUZ KB "RJD-Medicine", Krasnoyarsk, Russia, from September 2021 to March 2023, was carried out. Factors that could affect the efficiency and safety of PCNL were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean duration of the procedure was 39.6 +/- 14.4 minutes. The average decrease in hemoglobin level was 5.9 +/- 5.5. Narcotic analgesics were used postoperatively in 17.5% (7) of patients. The mean length of stay was 4.7 +/- 1.1 days. Transient fever was observed in 4 (10%) cases. In one case, an exacerbation of chronic pyelonephritis developed. There were no cases of significant bleeding during the PCNL, and no patients required blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that totally tubeless PNL is a safe alternative to standard procedure and is not associated with an increased risk of early postoperative complications. This technique is efficient and safe for kidney stones and may be recommended for a select group of patients.

Camposampiero tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (tPCNL): Easy, quick, effective, safe.

OBJECTIVES: To describe our technique to perform tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (tPCNL) using hemostatic matrix (i.e. Floseal®) for the closure of the percutaneous tract, developed through the experience gained in our endourology specialized center. To evaluate the procedure efficacy and safety. METHODS: tPCNL performed in our center with Floseal® application from February 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and surgical data were collected in order to evaluate the success of the procedure and possible complications. Camposampiero technique is reported in detail. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (45 males, mean age 58 years old) were included. In all patients the procedure was completed successfully and in 88% of subjects no further treatments were necessary; a low complication rate (6.9%) was reported. CONCLUSION: In our experience, tPCNL with Floseal application is feasible, safe, and effective.

Improvements in cuirass ventilation for airway surgery: origins in Copenhagen on the 70th anniversary of the first intensive care unit.

The first modern intensive care unit was established in Copenhagen 70 yr ago. This cornerstone of anaesthesia was largely based on experience gained using positive pressure ventilation to save hundreds of patients during the polio epidemic in 1952. Ventilation approaches, monitoring techniques, and pharmacological innovations have developed to such an extent that cuirass ventilation, which proved inadequate during the polio epidemic, might now have novel applications for both anaesthesia and treatment of the critically ill.

The effect of intraoperative transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange on emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) has received extensive attention for its utility in tubeless anesthesia. Still, the effects of its carbon dioxide accumulation on emergence from anesthesia have not been reported. This randomized controlled trial aimed at exploring the impact of THRIVE combined with laryngeal mask (LM) on the quality of emergence in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery. METHODS: After research ethics board approval, 40 eligible patients receiving elective microlaryngeal vocal cord polypectomy were randomly allocated 1:1 to two groups, THRIVE + LM group: intraoperative apneic oxygenation using THRIVE followed by mechanical ventilation through a laryngeal mask in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), or MV + ETT group: mechanically ventilated through an endotracheal tube for both intraoperative and post-anesthesia periods. The primary outcome was duration of PACU stay. Other parameters reflecting quality of emergence and carbon dioxide accumulation were also recorded. RESULTS: Duration of PACU stay (22.4 ± 6.4 vs. 28.9 ± 8.8 min, p = 0.011) was shorter in the THRIVE + LM group. The incidence of cough (2/20, 10% vs. 19/20, 95%, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the THRIVE + LM group. Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation and mean arterial pressure during intraoperative and PACU stay, Quality of Recovery Item 40 total score at one day after surgery and Voice Handicap Index-10 score at seven days after surgery were of no difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The THRIVE + LM strategy could accelerate emergence from anesthesia and reduce the incidence of cough without compromising oxygenation. However, these benefits did not convert to the QoR-40 and VHI-10 scores improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000038652.

Spontaneous Ventilation With High-Flow Nasal Oxygen for Elective Suspension Microlaryngoscopy.

Objective: Spontaneous ventilation under intravenous anesthesia allows the surgeon to work without interruption or obstruction of the operating field during suspension microlaryngoscopy (SML). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) is increasingly used in anesthesia. We hypothesized that its use during SML would increase patient safety even in situations where the airway is compromised by tumor or stenosis. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland. Methods: Adults patients who were scheduled for elective microlaryngeal surgery and managed with HFNO in spontaneous ventilation under general anesthesia between October 2020 and December 2021. Results: Twenty-seven patients for a total of 32 surgical procedures were performed under HFNO with spontaneous ventilation. Seventy-five percent of the patients had respiratory symptoms. Twelve patients (42.9%) were planned for the treatment of subglottic or tracheal stenosis and 5 patients were managed for vocal cord cancer (18.5%). Out of 32 surgeries, 4 cases of saturation < 92% occurred, 3 of them during the decrease of the fraction of inspired oxygen to 30% for the use of the laser. In 3 cases, the patients were intubated to correct the hypoxemia. Conclusion: Spontaneous respiration using intravenous anesthesia and high-flow nasal oxygen is a modern technique that increases patient safety while allowing the surgeon to work without interruption or imputation of the operative field during SML. This approach is particularly promising for the management of airways compromised by tumors or laryngotracheal stenosis.

Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness.

Introduction This study focuses on investigating the effect of routine nephrostomy tube placement in patients with moderate renal calculi of size 2.5 cm or less who undergo uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures. Previous studies have not specified whether only uncomplicated cases were included in the analysis, which may affect the results. This study aims to provide a clearer understanding of the effect of routine nephrostomy tube placement on blood loss in a more homogeneous patient population. Materials and methods A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at our department over 18 months, dividing 60 patients with a single renal or upper ureteric calculus of size ≤2.5 cm into two groups: 30 patients in each group (group 1: tubed PCNL, group 2: tubeless PCNL). The primary outcome was the drop in perioperative hemoglobin level and the number of packed cell transfusions necessary. The secondary outcome included the mean pain score, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activities, and the total cost of the procedure. Results The two groups were comparable in age, gender, comorbidities, and stone size. The postoperative hemoglobin level was significantly lower in the tubeless PCNL group (9.56 ± 2.13 gm/dL) compared to the tube PCNL group (11.32 ± 2.35 gm/dL) (p = 0.0037), and two patients in the tubeless group required blood transfusion. The duration of surgery, pain scores, and analgesic requirement were comparable between the two groups. The total procedure cost was significantly lower in the tubeless group (p = 0.0019), and the duration of hospital stay and time to return to daily activities were significantly shorter in the tubeless group (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Tubeless PCNL is a safe and effective alternative to conventional tube PCNL, with the advantages of shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, and lower procedure costs. Tube PCNL is associated with less blood loss and the need for transfusions. Patient preferences and bleeding risk should be considered when choosing between the two procedures.

Feasibility of tubeless thoracoscopic bullectomy in primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients.

OBJECTIVES: Although early removal of postoperative chest drains can facilitate postoperative recovery, there are risks of undetected bleeding and a need for re-drainage to treat delayed pulmonary air leaks. In this study, we aimed to prospectively examine the feasibility of tubeless thoracoscopic bullectomy in primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) patients. METHODS: Between January 2021 and November 2021, 30 PSP patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The absence of air leakage was confirmed and radiographic evidence of lung expansion was acquired; the tube was then removed in the operating room. The primary endpoint was postoperative air leakage requiring re-drainage among patients who underwent tube removal in the operating room. The secondary endpoints were postoperative pain (numerical rating scale) on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 7, and 28, morbidity, and postoperative hospitalization time. RESULTS: Four (13.3%) patients were excluded because of underlying pulmonary disease (n = 2) and air leaks (n = 2) detected in the operating room. Chest drainage tubes were removed in the operating room for the remaining 26 patients; none of them required re-drainage. The mean postoperative hospitalization time was 1.2 ± 0.4 days. The mean numerical rating scale scores were 4.2 ± 2 (median: 4.5), 1.6 ± 1.6 (median: 1), and 0.4 ± 0.8 (median: 0) on PODs 1, 7, and 28, respectively. Only one case of hemoptysis occurred as a postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: Tubeless thoracoscopic bullectomy for PSP is feasible and may reduce the postoperative hospitalization time; however, it does not significantly reduce pain on POD1.

Efficacy and safety of partial tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi / 现代泌尿外科杂志

【Objective】 To compare the efficacy and safety between partial tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 802 patients with upper urinary tract calculi treated at our hospital during Jun.2018 and Dec.2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the partial tubeless group and standard group, and 60 cases in either group were selected by a simple random method. Clinical data, complications and stone-free rate were compared between the two groups. 【Results】 All 120 patients completed the operation successfully. The postoperative hospital stay, pain score and postoperative recovery of the partial tubeless group were significantly superior to those of the standard group (P0.05). 【Conclusion】 In the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi, partial tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy can achieve satisfactory surgical results, and has obvious advantages in postoperative recovery and patients’ experience. It is worthy of clinical application.

The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

To study the feasibility and safety of One-Shot Dilatation (OSD), versus serial sequential dilatation in tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). One Hundred and Fifty patients were randomised into two groups; Group A (One-Shot Dilatation), Group B (Serial Dilatation). Twenty-one patients were excluded from the study. Detailed history was taken and full physical examination was performed. Pre-operative routine laboratory investigations were done. Also, non-contrast Computed Tomography of the Urinary Tract (CTUT) and plain urinary tract x-ray were done. Intra-operative assessments of dilatation, total operative, total fluoroscopy and fluoroscopy during dilatation durations were recorded, as well as estimated blood loss. Post-operatively haemoglobin, creatinine levels and CTUT were performed for all patients. Complications, as urinary leakage time, analgesic requirements and hospitalization time were measured. There were statistically significant differences in the intraoperative durations, where Group A had shorter dilatation time, fluoroscopy time during dilatation and total operative time. Group B had a higher complications rate than Group A; 37.9%, 11.3%, respectively. Also, Group B showed haemoglobin drop by 0.44 mg/dl higher than Group A. More doses of analgesia were required for Group B. Hospitalization time and rate of urinary leakage were both in favour of Group A. For patients undergoing Tubeless PCNL, we have concluded that one-shot dilatation seems to be a safer and more feasible technique than Serial dilatation.