Diagnostic efficiency of conventional ultrasound, shear wave elastography, and superb microvascular imaging in evaluating ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The current diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) relies mainly on the clinical presentation and nerve electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing, which can be uncomfortable and yield false negatives. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound, shear wave elastography (SWE), and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in diagnosing UNE. METHODS: We enrolled 40 patients (48 elbows) with UNE and 48 healthy volunteers (48 elbows). The patients were categorized as having mild, moderate or severe UNE based on the findings of EDX testing. The cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured using conventional ultrasound. Ulnar nerve (UN) shear wave velocity (SWV) and SMI were performed in a longitudinal plane. RESULTS: Based on the EDX findings, UNE severity was graded as mild in 4, moderate in 10, and severe in 34. The patient group showed increased ulnar nerve CSA and stiffness at the site of maximal enlargement (CSA mean at the site of max enlargement [CSAmax] and SWV mean at the site of max enlargement [SWVmax]), ulnar nerve CSA ratio, and stiffness ratio (elbow-to-upper arm), compared with the control group (p < .001). Furthermore, the severe UNE group showed higher ulnar nerve CSAmax and SWVmax compared with the mild and moderate UNE groups (p < .001). The cutoff values for diagnosis of UNE were 9.5 mm2 for CSAmax, 3.06 m/s for SWVmax, 2.00 for CSA ratio, 1.36 for stiffness ratio, and grade 1 for SMI. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that SWE and SMI are valuable diagnostic tools for the diagnosis and assessment of severity of UNE.

Assessment of the ulnar nerve stiffness during valgus stress of the elbow using shear wave elastography: an observational cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Identification of the relationship between valgus stress in the medial elbow and ulnar nerve strain during maximum external rotation of the shoulder is pivotal for the prevention and management of ulnar neuropathies. In this observational cross-sectional study, we aimed to determine the changes in ulnar nerve stiffness under valgus stress at different nerve entrapment sites. METHODS: Twenty healthy baseball players participated in the study. The stiffness of the ulnar nerve on the throwing side was assessed at two sites, the arcade of Struthers and the Osborne's ligament, at 0°, 60°, and 90° flexion by shear wave elastography using a 10-MHz linear transducer. The arcade of Struthers was defined as the proximal site and the Osborne's ligament as the distal site. Valgus stress was applied to the medial elbow at 0, 30, 50, and 70 N using a Telos stress device, and the stiffness caused by valgus stress was measured. RESULTS: At all elbow flexion angles, the stiffness of the ulnar nerve under 70 N valgus stress was higher than that under 30 N stress. The stiffness of the ulnar nerve at the proximal site was significantly higher than that at the distal site. CONCLUSION: Valgus stress increases ulnar nerve stiffness. In addition, the stiffness of the proximal site increases.

Ulnar neuropathy.

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most common compressive neuropathy. Less common, although similarly disabling, are ulnar neuropathies above the elbow, at the forearm, and the wrist, which can present with different combinations of intrinsic hand muscle weakness and sensory loss. Electrodiagnostic studies are moderately sensitive in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy, although their ability to localize the site of nerve injury is often limited. Nerve imaging with ultrasound can provide greater localization of ulnar injury and identification of specific anatomical pathology causing nerve entrapment. Specifically, imaging can now reliably distinguish ulnar nerve entrapment under the humero-ulnar arcade (cubital tunnel) from nerve injury at the retro-epicondylar groove. Both these pathologies have historically been diagnosed as either "ulnar neuropathy at the elbow," which is non-specific, or "cubital tunnel syndrome," which is often erroneous. Natural history studies are few and limited, although many cases of mild-moderate ulnar neuropathy at the elbow appear to remit spontaneously. Conservative management, perineural steroid injections, and surgical release have all been studied in treating ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Despite this, questions remain about the most appropriate management for many patients, which is reflected in the absence of management guidelines.

The role of imaging in focal neuropathies.

Electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) has been the diagnostic tool of choice in peripheral nerve disease for many years, but in recent years, peripheral nerve imaging has been used ever more frequently in daily clinical practice. Nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance (MR) neurography are able to visualize nerve structures reliably. These techniques can aid in localizing nerve pathology and can reveal significant anatomical abnormalities underlying nerve pathology that may have been otherwise undetected by EDX. As such, nerve ultrasound and MR neurography can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and can have a significant effect on treatment strategy. In this chapter, the basic principles and recent developments of these techniques will be discussed, as well as their potential application in several types of peripheral nerve disease, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), radial neuropathy, brachial and lumbosacral plexopathy, neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), fibular, tibial, sciatic, femoral neuropathy, meralgia paresthetica, peripheral nerve trauma, tumors, and inflammatory neuropathies.

Ulnar Neuropathy after Distal Radius Fractures - A Case Series and Review of Literature.

Background: Ulnar neuropathy after a distal radius fracture is rare and has limited reports in literature. As such, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment and management of such injuries. We report our experience with managing these uncommon injuries. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted where patients presenting with ulnar neuropathy after sustaining a distal radius fracture were identified from January 2021 to December 2023 from our hospital database. Results: A total of four patients were identified. All of them underwent surgical fixation for their respective fractures. None of them underwent immediate or delayed exploration and decompression of the ulnar nerve. All patients had clinical improvement at 3 months after their initial injuries. Three patients eventually had resolution of the neuropathy between 5 and 9 months post injury, while one had partial recovery and developed a neuroma but declined surgery due to symptoms minimally affecting work and daily activities. Conclusions: Ulnar neuropathy after distal radius fractures may not be as rare as previously thought. Expectant management of the neuropathy would be a reasonable treatment as long as there is no evidence of nerve discontinuity or translocation and that there is clinical and/or electrodiagnostic improvement at 3-4 months after the initial injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Surgical Decision Making for Mild-to-Moderate Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Purpose: The management of ulnar neuropathy remains unclear as there are neither consensus guidelines nor compelling data available to inform optimal treatment. Identifying patients in the mild-to-moderate group that would benefit most from surgery is challenging as their symptoms can be subtle and less debilitating. This study investigated predictors of surgical intervention among patients presenting with McGowan mild or moderate cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). Methods: This is an institutional review board-approved study. Patients evaluated from March 2016 to July 2022 were included if they were diagnosed with McGowan mild or moderate CuTS and underwent concurrent electrodiagnostic and ultrasound evaluations. Patient demographics, symptom presentation, and clinical and diagnostic test findings were analyzed. Variables were analyzed using Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Pearson's chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of covariates and surgery. Results: Seventy-three patients and 103 elbows were identified. The mean age and body mass index were 51 years and 26.9, respectively. Most patients were men, right-handed, and unilaterally symptomatic in the dominant hand. Twenty-six elbows were surgically treated. Bivariable analyses by surgical treatment showed that patients who underwent surgery more often had positive electrodiagnostic findings including motor nerve conduction velocity <50 m/s and a >10 m/s conduction velocity difference across the forearm compared with elbow. Fifty-nine cases were categorized as electrodiagnostically normal. Of the electrodiagnostically normal cases, 29 had positive findings of CuTS on ultrasound. Logistic regression model showed that electrodiagnostically severe cases had 3.7 times higher odds of being surgically treated than normal counterparts (adjusted odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.11-12.6; P = .03). Conclusions: Not many differences in objective findings identify patients who should receive operative treatment. In addition to test results, more subjective findings from patients such as patient-reported level of impairment may be able to bridge this gap in surgical decision making. Clinical relevance: This study contributes to treatment decision making for mild and moderate CuTS.

Assessing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using magnetoneurography.

OBJECTIVE: To measure neuromagnetic fields of ulnar neuropathy patients at the elbow after electrical stimulation and evaluate ulnar nerve function at the elbow with high spatial resolution. METHODS: A superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer system recorded neuromagnetic fields of the ulnar nerve at the elbow after electrical stimulation at the wrist in 16 limbs of 16 healthy volunteers and 21 limbs of 20 patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. After artifact removal, neuromagnetic field signals were processed into current distributions, which were superimposed onto X-ray images for visualization. RESULTS: Based on the results in healthy volunteers, conduction velocity of 30 m/s or 50% attenuation in current amplitude was set as the reference value for conduction disturbance. Of the 21 patient limbs, 15 were measurable and lesion sites were detected, whereas 6 limbs were unmeasurable due to weak neuromagnetic field signals. Seven limbs were deemed normal by nerve conduction study, but 5 showed conduction disturbances on magnetoneurography. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the magnetic field after nerve stimulation enabled visualization of neurophysiological activity in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and evaluation of conduction disturbances. SIGNIFICANCE: Magnetoneurography may be useful for assessing lesion sites in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Characteristics of ulnar neuropathy in baseball players: Focusing on the entrapment point of the ulnar nerve and valgus instability.

Background: The region where the ulnar nerve (UN) is swollen in baseball players with ulnar neuropathy is not apparent. This study investigated the UN's cross-sectional area (CSA) at each entrapment point in baseball players. We also aimed to clarify the relationship between valgus instability and the CSA of the UN. Methods: Forty baseball players were separated into healthy and ulnar neuropathy groups. The CSA and valgus instability were measured using ultrasonography (US). Relative to the medial epicondyle (MEC), the arcade of Struthers (SA) was 5 cm proximal, the cubital tunnel was the posterior part, and Osborne's ligament was defined as 3 cm distal. The ulnohumeral joint space was imaged as a low-echo space between the distal-medial corner of the trochlea and the proximal edge of the sublime tubercle. Results: The UN in the ulnar neuropathy group had significant swelling in the cubital tunnel and Osborne's ligament. We found a weak positive correlation between the CSA and ulnohumeral joint space, and the ulnohumeral joint space at rest and valgus stress. Conclusion: Evaluation and treatment of UN, especially cubital tunnel and Osborne's ligament, are necessary for the rehabilitation of baseball players presenting with ulnar neuropathy and valgus instability.

Bony encasement of the ulnar nerve secondary to heterotopic ossification of the elbow: an evaluation of long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow caused by heterotopic ossification (HO) is a rare condition. This retrospective study aims to report on 32 consecutive cases of ulnar nerve encasement caused by elbow HO and evaluate long-term outcomes of operative management and a standardized postoperative rehabilitation regimen. METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted on 32 elbows (27 patients) that underwent operative management of bony ulnar nerve encasement. All procedures were performed in the inpatient setting at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center from September 1999 to July 2021 by one of 3 fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow. Postoperatively, all patients received formal physical therapy, HO prophylaxis (30 received indomethacin, 2 received radiation), and a structured continuous passive motion machine regimen. Patient demographics, age, gender, type of injury, history of tobacco use, and medical comorbidities were obtained to include in the analysis. Long-term follow-up examinations were performed to evaluate elbow flexion-extension arc of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and visual analog scale pain scores. RESULTS: Thirty-two elbows with complete bony ulnar nerve encasement secondary to HO were identified (14 from burns, 15 from trauma, 3 closed head injuries). Following surgery, the mean flexion-extension arc of motion improved significantly, increasing from 21° to 100° at long-term follow-up (average 8.7 years, range 2-17 years), with statistically significant improvements in preoperative vs. long-term postoperative elbow extension (P < .001), flexion (P < .001), and total arc of motion (P < .001). There was a statistically significant improvement in pre- vs. postprocedure ulnar nerve function, as demonstrated by a decrease in average McGowan grade (1.2-0.7; P = .002). Additionally, 63% of patients with preoperative ulnar neuropathy symptoms (20/32) had either complete resolution or subjective improvement after surgery. The mean time from injury to surgery was 518 days (range 65-943 days). Age, gender, time to surgery, and medical comorbidities were not associated with outcomes. The complication rate was 9% (3/32). Patients had an average flexion-extension arc of motion of 97° and average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 80 ("good") at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of operative management, postoperative HO prophylaxis, and a regimented rehabilitation program has proven to be a durable solution for treating and ensuring good long-term functional outcomes for patients with elbow HO and bony ulnar nerve encasement. This treatment approach leads to superior range of motion, improved or resolved ulnar neuropathy, and good to excellent long-term functional outcomes.

Comparison of electrodiagnostic findings in acute traumatic versus chronic non-traumatic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: A common concept is that traumatic nerve injuries are more likely axonal, and that compressive neuropathies are more likely demyelinating. The purpose of this study was to compare traumatic versus non-traumatic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) to look for electrodiagnostic differences between the two groups. METHODS: A retrospective 3 year review of UNE patients at two academic health science centers was conducted. Patients were grouped into acute traumatic UNE versus chronic non-traumatic UNE based on clinical history. Electrodiagnostic measurements were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 50 subjects with acute traumatic UNE and 41 with chronic non-traumatic UNE. Mean age and sex distribution were similar but those with traumatic UNE had a 7 month duration of symptoms, while those with chronic UNE had 29 month duration (p < .001). All electrodiagnostic measurements were similar between the two groups including compound muscle action potential amplitudes, motor conduction velocities, frequency of conduction block, sensory nerve studies, and needle electromyography. DISCUSSION: We did not find a difference between the two groups. One should not make inferences regarding acuity or etiology based on electrodiagnostic features alone.

Multimodality imaging review of ulnar nerve pathologies.

The ulnar nerve is the second most commonly entrapped nerve after the median nerve. Although clinical evaluation and electrodiagnostic studies remain widely used for the evaluation of ulnar neuropathy, advancements in imaging have led to increased utilization of these newer / better imaging techniques in the overall management of ulnar neuropathy. Specifically, high-resolution ultrasonography of peripheral nerves as well as MRI has become quite useful in evaluating the ulnar nerve in order to better guide treatment. The caliber and fascicular pattern identified in the normal ulnar nerves are important distinguishing features from ulnar nerve pathology. The cubital tunnel within the elbow and Guyon's canal within the wrist are important sites to evaluate with respect to ulnar nerve compression. Both acute and chronic conditions resulting in deformity, trauma as well as inflammatory conditions may predispose certain patients to ulnar neuropathy. Granulomatous diseases as well as both neurogenic and non-neurogenic tumors can also potentially result in ulnar neuropathy. Tumors around the ulnar nerve can also lead to mass effect on the nerve, particularly in tight spaces like the aforementioned canals. Although high-resolution ultrasonography is a useful modality initially, particularly as it can be helpful for dynamic evaluation, MRI remains most reliable due to its higher resolution. Newer imaging techniques like sonoelastography and microneurography, as well as nerve-specific contrast agents, are currently being investigated for their usefulness and are not routinely being used currently.

Core outcomes in nerve surgery: development of a core outcome set for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

OBJECTIVE: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is common, affecting 1%-6% of the population. Despite this, there remains a lack of consensus regarding optimal treatment. This is primarily due to the difficulty one encounters when trying to assess the literature. Outcomes are inconsistently reported, which makes comparing studies or developing meta-analyses difficult or even impossible. Thus, there is a need for a core outcome set (COS) for UNE (COS-UNE) to help address this problem. The objective of this study was to utilize a modified Delphi method to develop COS-UNE. METHODS: A 5-stage approach was utilized to develop COS-UNE: stage 1, consortium development; 2, literature review to identify potential outcome measures; 3, Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion; 4, Delphi survey to develop definitions; and 5, consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. The study followed the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. RESULTS: The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 21 participants, all neurological surgeons representing 11 countries. The final COS-UNE consisted of 22 data points/outcomes covering the domains of demographic characteristics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor/sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 6 months, with the consensus optimal timepoints for assessment identified as preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors identified consensus data points/outcomes and also provided definitions and specific scales to be utilized to help ensure that clinicians are consistent in their reporting across studies on UNE. This COS should serve as a minimum set of data to be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on UNE. The authors hope that clinicians evaluating ulnar neuropathy will incorporate this COS into routine practice and that future studies will consider this COS in the design phase.

The hand diagram: A novel outcome measure following supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve to ulnar nerve transfer in severe compressive ulnar neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: With advances in the surgical management for severe ulnar neuropathy with the introduction of the super charged-end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve transfer, a simple and reliable outcome measure is required. There is currently not "one" standardized outcome measure used to represent and compare results. PURPOSE: To present the abduction hand diagram as a "novel", reproducible, and simple outcome measure for patients with severe ulnar neuropathy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Nine patients with severe entrapment/compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow were reviewed. Clinical parameters included preoperative and postoperative abduction tracings, Medical Research Grade (MRC) muscle strength, key pinch strength, Disability of the Hand Arm and Shoulder (DASH) score, and crossed finger test. Electrodiagnostic data included change in compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) amplitude of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM). Summary statistics were used for demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 22.8 ± 9.3 months. At 18-months of follow up, 44% had ADM MRC grade 3 strength or higher, mean key pinch strength improved to 72 ± 19.3%, and mean DASH was 33 ± 28.7. There was a mean increase of 16.7 ± 9.1 mm and 31.5 ± 12 mm in total and summed hand abduction tracing measurements respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hand abduction tracings are a quantitative outcome measure to follow recovery over time for intrinsic hand function and can be used in patients with severe ulnar neuropathy following surgical intervention.

Ulnar Nerve Management in Distal Humerus Fracture Surgery: A Case of Developing Ulnar Neuropathy After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

In this case report, we want to show how a patient who underwent surgery for a distal humerus fracture developed postoperative ulnar neuropathy symptoms, how nonunion persisted even at the ninth month of follow-up, and whether the nonunion was connected to the ulnar neuropathy that developed. Due to this, we used this case to explore ulnar nerve care and whether ulnar nerve transposition, manipulation, or decompression should be carried out during surgery on patients with distal humerus fractures. A 52-year-old man with a bi-columnar distal humerus fracture from a fall on his right elbow underwent open reduction and internal fixation at an external center one year before. Elbow restriction, discomfort, numbness, and weakness in the fourth and fifth digits of the right hand were all symptoms the patient experienced eight months following the surgery. We discovered the distal right humerus' nonunion during the radiological exams. It became apparent that the patient had no signs of ulnar neuropathy before the injury. In the eighth month following the injury, the patient had implant removal, open reduction internal fixation with autograft, and ulnar nerve transposition. We discovered during follow-up that the patient's ulnar neuropathy symptoms had subsided. The surgeon's familiarity with the procedure and command of the anatomy of the elbow has a role in managing the ulnar nerve in distal humerus fractures. We concluded that more study is required to determine the connection between the onset of ulnar neuropathy and nonunion while treating distal humerus fractures.

Transscaphoid Transcapitate Perilunate Fracture-dislocation with Inferior Arc Injury and Acute Ulnar Nerve Compression: A Case Report.

Introduction: Perilunate dislocations and perilunate fracture-dislocations (PLFD) are relatively uncommon injuries, comprising <10% of wrist injuries. Perilunate injuries are often complicated by median neuropathy reported in 23-45% of cases, whereas there are very few reported cases of associated ulnar neuropathy. Combined greater arc and inferior arc injuries are also rare. We report an unusual PLFD pattern with associated inferior arc injury and acute ulnar nerve compression. Case Report: A 34-year-old male sustained a wrist injury after a motorcycle collision. Computed tomography scan revealed a trans-scaphoid, transcapitate, perilunate fracture-dislocation, and a distal radius lunate facet volar rim fracture with radiocarpal subluxation. Examination revealed acute ulnar neuropathy without median neuropathy. He underwent urgent nerve decompression and closed reduction, followed by open reduction internal fixation the next day. He recovered without complication. Conclusion: This case emphasizes the importance of a thorough neurovascular examination to rule out less commonly seen neuropathies. With up to 25% of perilunate injuries misdiagnosed, surgeons should have a low threshold for advanced imaging in high-energy injuries.

A Tardy Ulnar Palsy with an Anomalous Course of Ulnar Nerve.

Variations are inherent feature of the intricate brachial plexus. They can be at the level of origin, the course, or the innervation pattern of each peripheral nerve. Knowledge of the various described variations can be worthwhile during the routine hand surgery procedures. We present a case of an elderly patient with anomalous intramuscular course of the ulnar nerve presenting with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Level of Evidence: IV.

Clinical and neurophysiological recovery of ulnar nerve conduction block at the elbow.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: An important mechanism of peripheral nerve motor and sensory dysfunction is conduction block (CB). However, recovery from mechanically induced CB has been rarely studied in humans. The aim of this study was to describe clinical, electrodiagnostic (EDx), and ultrasonographic (US) characteristics of CB recovery in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). METHODS: We recruited a group of consecutive patients presenting to our EDx laboratory with UNE and >50% motor CB. Patients' histories were obtained and neurologic, EDx, and US examinations were repeated every 1-3 mo for at least 12 mo. RESULTS: We studied 10 patients (5 men), with a mean age of 63 y (range, 51-81 y). In all affected arms CB was localized to the retrocondylar groove. Following conservative management, myometrically measured index finger abduction improved from a median of 49% to 100% relative to the contralateral index finger, and ulnar nerve CB decreased from a median of 74% to 6%. Most of the improvement took place within 8 mo of symptom onset, and 6 mo after receiving treatment instructions. Mean motor nerve conduction velocity improved from 15 to 27 m/s in the most affected 2-cm ulnar nerve segment. DISCUSSION: The resolution of CB after typical chronic compression may take longer than after acute compression. This should be considered by clinicians when estimating prognosis for discussions with patients.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Does a Consensus Exist for Diagnosis?

PURPOSE: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. We aimed to determine a consensus among experts using the Delphi method for clinical criteria that could be validated further for the diagnosis of CuTS. METHODS: The Delphi method was used for establishing a consensus among a group of expert panelists, comprising 12 hand and upper-extremity surgeons, who ranked the diagnostic clinical importance of 55 items related to CuTS on a scale from 1 (least important) to 10 (most important). The average and SDs of each item were calculated, and Cronbach α was used to assess homogeneity among the panelist-ranked items. RESULTS: All panelists answered the 55-item questionnaire. A Cronbach α value of 0.963 was obtained on the first iteration. The top criteria that were considered most clinically relevant to the diagnosis of CuTS among the group were determined based on the most highly ranked and correlated items among the expert panelist group. The criteria based on which there was agreement were as follows: (1) paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution, (2) symptoms precipitated by increased elbow flexion/positive elbow flexion tests, (3) positive Tinel sign at the medial elbow, (4) atrophy/weakness/ late findings (eg, claw hand of the ring/small finger and Wartenberg or Froment sign) of ulnar nerve-innervated muscles of the hand, (5) loss of two-point discrimination in ulnar nerve distribution, and (6) similar symptoms on the involved side after successful treatment on the contralateral side. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a consensus among an expert panelist group of hand and upper-extremity surgeons on potential diagnostic criteria for CuTS. This consensus on diagnostic criteria may help clinicians readily diagnose CuTS in a standardized form; however, further weighting and validation are necessary prior to the development of a formal diagnostic scale. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study is the first step in producing a consensus on how to diagnose CuTS.

Safety of Cubital Tunnel Release Under General versus Regional Anesthesia.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of early (<6 weeks) post-operative complications following ulnar nerve decompressions at the cubital tunnel performed under regional anesthesia compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Methods: In situ ulnar nerve decompressions at the cubital tunnel performed at a single institution from 2012 through 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Post-operative complications were compared between subjects who underwent the procedure with regional versus general anesthesia. Results: Ninety-one ulnar nerve in situ decompressions were included in the study, which were performed under regional anesthesia in 55 and general anesthesia in 36 cases. The occurrence of post-operative complications was not significantly different between patients who received regional (n = 7) anesthesia and general (n = 8) anesthesia. None of the complications were directly attributed to the type of anesthesia administered. The change in pre- and post-operative McGowan scores were not significantly different between anesthesia groups (p = 0.81). Conclusion: In situ ulnar nerve decompression at the cubital tunnel under regional anesthesia does not result in increased post-operative complications compared to those surgeries performed under general anesthesia. In situ ulnar nerve decompression performed under regional anesthesia is a safe and reliable option for patients who wish to avoid general anesthesia. Level of Evidence: III.