Fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a secondary analysis of the CLOVERS trial.

BACKGROUND: Early fluid management in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and sepsis-induced hypotension is challenging with limited evidence to support treatment recommendations. We aimed to compare an early restrictive versus liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension in patients with advanced CKD. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included patients with advanced CKD (eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or history of end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis) from the crystalloid liberal or vasopressor early resuscitation in sepsis (CLOVERS) trial. The primary endpoint was death from any cause before discharge home by day 90. RESULTS: Of 1563 participants enrolled in the CLOVERS trial, 196 participants had advanced CKD (45% on chronic dialysis), with 92 participants randomly assigned to the restrictive treatment group and 104 assigned to the liberal fluid group. Death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 occurred significantly less often in the restrictive fluid group compared with the liberal fluid group (20 [21.7%] vs. 41 [39.4%], HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.29-0.85). Participants in the restrictive fluid group had more vasopressor-free days (19.7 ± 10.4 days vs. 15.4 ± 12.6 days; mean difference 4.3 days, 95% CI, 1.0-7.5) and ventilator-free days by day 28 (21.0 ± 11.8 vs. 16.5 ± 13.6 days; mean difference 4.5 days, 95% CI, 0.9-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced CKD and sepsis-induced hypotension, an early restrictive fluid strategy, prioritizing vasopressor use, was associated with a lower risk of death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 as compared with an early liberal fluid strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03434028 (2018-02-09), BioLINCC 14149.

Prevalence and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients at high cardiovascular risk. COVID-19 patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are at increased risk of poor clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine hospital outcomes among patients admitted with AF and COVID -19 infection.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2020 California State Inpatient data, including all COVID-19 hospitalizations of individuals aged ≥18. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (above the 75th percentile), vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission. We compared adverse hospital outcomes between those with and without AF and used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounders.Results: This analysis included 94,114 COVID-19 hospitalizations, of which 9,391 (10.0%) had AF. Patients with COVID-19 and AF had higher rates of adverse outcomes, including mortality (27.2% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001), prolonged length of stay (40.0% versus 27.1%, P < 0.001), vasopressor use (4.4% versus 1.9%, P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (19.0% versus 9.1%, P < 0.001), and ICU admission (18.4% versus 8.8%, P < 0.001) After multivariable adjustment, the odds of adverse outcomes remained significantly higher, including mortality (aOR, 2.04, 95% CI: 1.92-2.16), prolonged length of stay (aOR, 1.37, 95% CI: 1.31-1.44), vasopressor use (aOR, 1.98, 95% CI: 1.86-2.11), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.95, 95% CI: 1.72-2.20), and ICU admission (aOR, 2.01, 95% CI: 1.88-2.15).Conclusion: COVID -19 hospitalized patients frequently have underlying AF, which confers a higher risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality, even after adjusting for baseline comorbidities. Heightened awareness is needed in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with AF.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder, especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to investigate the hospital outcomes for patients admitted with both AF and COVID-19. We used data from the California State Inpatient Database for the year 2020, focusing on COVID-19 hospitalizations of adults aged 18 and older. The main outcomes studied were in-hospital death, extended hospital stays, use of vasopressor medications that raise blood pressure, need for mechanical ventilation, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our results showed that patients with both COVID-19 and AF had significantly worse outcomes compared to those without AF. Specifically, these patients had higher rates of death, extended hospital stays, vasopressor medication use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, even after accounting for other health conditions. The study concludes that hospitalized COVID-19 patients with underlying AF are at a greater risk for severe complications and death. This highlights the need for increased attention and care for COVID-19 patients with AF to improve their hospital outcomes.

Intubation of critically ill patients: A pilot study of minute-by-minute physiological changes within an Australian tertiary intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: There are no published minute-by-minute physiological assessment data for endotracheal intubation (ETT) performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). The majority of physiological data is available from Europe and North America where etomidate is the induction agent administered most commonly. AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility of obtaining minute-by-minute physiological and medication data surrounding ETT in an Australian tertiary ICU and to assess its associated outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single-centre feasibility observational study. We obtained minute-by-minute data on physiological variables and medications for 15 min before and 30 min after ETT. We assessed feasibility as enrolled to screened patient ratio and completeness of data collection in enrolled patients. Severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 65 mmHg) and severe hypoxaemia (pulse oximetry saturation < 80%) were the secondary clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We screened 43 patients and studied 30 patients. The median age was 58.5 (interquartile range: 49-70) years, and 18 (60%) were male. Near-complete (97%) physiological and medication data were obtained in all patients at all times. Overall, 15 (50%) ETTs occurred after hours (17:30-08:00) and 90% were by video laryngoscopy with a 90% first-pass success rate. Prophylactic vasopressors were used in 50% of ETTs. Fentanyl was used in all except one ETT at a median dose of 2.5 mcg/kg. Propofol (63%) or midazolam (50%) were used as adjuncts at low dose. Rocuronium was used in all but one patient. There were no episodes of severe hypotension and only one episode of short-lived severe hypoxaemia. CONCLUSION: Minute-by-minute recording of ETT-associated physiological changes in the ICU was feasible but only fully available in two-thirds of the screened patients. ETT was based on fentanyl induction, low-dose adjunctive sedation, and frequent prophylactic vasopressor therapy and was associated with no severe hypotension and a single short-lived episode of severe hypoxaemia.

Comparison of early and late norepinephrine administration in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressor administration at an appropriate time is crucial but the optimal timing remains controversial. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does early versus late norepinephrine (NE) administration impact the prognosis of septic shock? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KMBASE. We included studies of adults with sepsis and categorized patients into early and late NE group according to specific time points or differences in norepinephrine use protocols. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in the intensive care unit, days free from ventilator use, days free from renal replacement therapy, days free from vasopressor use, adverse events, and total fluid volume. RESULTS: Twelve studies (4 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 8 observational) comprising 7,281 patients were analyzed. For overall mortality, no significant difference was found between the early NE group and late NE group in RCTs (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.19) or observational studies (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-1.29). In the two RCTs without a restrictive fluid strategy that prioritized vasopressors and lower intravenous fluid volumes, the early NE group showed significantly lower mortality than the late NE group (OR 0.49, 95%, CI, 0.25-0.96). The early NE group demonstrated more mechanical ventilator-free days in observational studies (MD, 4.06; 95% CI, 2.82-5.30). The incidence of pulmonary edema was lower in the early NE group in the three RCTs that reported this outcome (OR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.74). No differences were found in the other secondary outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Overall mortality did not differ significantly between early and late NE administration for septic shock. However, early NE administration appeared to reduce pulmonary edema incidence, and mortality improvement was observed in studies without fluid restriction interventions, favoring early NE use.

Transient Diabetes Insipidus After Vasopressin Discontinuation.

Vasopressin infusion is commonly used in intensive care settings during states of advanced vasodilatory shock for its vasoconstrictive properties. Vasopressin also acts on renal tubular cell receptors in the collecting ducts of kidneys to allow for water reabsorption. The sudden discontinuation of vasopressin infusion can lead to the development of transient diabetes insipidus (DI) with classic findings of polyuria, dilute urine, and hypernatremia. We report the case of a 59-year-old male who underwent an emergent bedside cricothyrotomy procedure secondary to papillary carcinoma of the thyroid and subsequently developed septic shock requiring initiation of vasopressin infusion for hemodynamic support. He remained on vasopressin for five days before the infusion was discontinued after clinical improvement. Within 12 hours of vasopressin discontinuation, the patient developed polyuria (> 3 L/day urine output) with volumes as high as 1 L per hour. His serum sodium levels increased more than 10 mmol/L from 137 to 149 mmol/L. This case is unique from prior reports, as our patient was without any neurological or neurosurgical comorbidities that would predispose him to an organic central cause of DI. Furthermore, the patient's large-volume diuresis and serum abnormalities spontaneously self-improved within 24 hours without significant medical intervention. In conclusion, this case adds to a growing number of reports of transient DI following vasopressin withdrawal, demonstrating the need to formally recognize this occurrence as a potential consequence of vasopressin use in intensive care settings.

Vasoconstriction with phenylephrine increases cardiac output in preload dependent patients.

General Anaesthesia (GA) is accompanied by a marked decrease in sympathetic outflow and thus loss of vasomotor control of cardiac preload. The use of vasoconstriction during GA has mainly focused on maintaining blood pressure. Phenylephrine (PE) is a pure α1-agonist without inotropic effects widely used to correct intraoperative hypotension. The potential of PE for augmenting cardiac stroke volume (SV) and -output (CO) by venous recruitment is controversial and no human studies have explored the effects of PE in preload dependent circulation using indicator dilution technique. We hypothesized that PE-infusion in patients with cardiac stroke volume limited by reduced preload would restore preload and thus augment SV and CO. 20 patients undergoing GA for gastrointestinal surgery were monitored with arterial catheter and LiDCO unity monitor. Upon stable haemodynamics after induction patients were placed in head-up tilt (HUT). All patients became preload responsive as verified by a stroke volume variation (SVV) of > 12%. PE-infusion was then started at 15-20mikrg/min and adjusted until preload was restored (SVV < 12%). Li-dilution cardiac output (CO) was initially measured after induction (baseline), again with HUT in the preload responsive phase, and finally when preload was restored with infusion of PE.At baseline SVV was 10 ± 3% (mean ± st.dev.), CI was 2,6 ± 0,4 L/min*m2, and SVI 43 ± 7mL/m2. With HUT SVV was 19 ± 4%, CI was 2,2 ± 0,4 L/min*m2, SVI 35 ± 7mL/m2. During PE-infusion SVV was reduced to 6 ± 3%, CI increased to 2,6 ± 0,5 L/min*m2, and SVI increased to 49 ± 11mL/m2. All differences p < 0,001. In conclusion: Infusion of phenylephrine during preload dependency increased venous return abolishing preload dependency as evaluated by SVV and increased cardiac stroke volume and -output as measured by indicator-dilution technique. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05193097).

Early intramuscular adrenaline administration is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Early administration of adrenaline is associated with improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Delays in vascular access may impact the timely delivery of adrenaline. Novel methods for administering adrenaline before vascular access may enhance survival. The objective of this study was to determine whether an initial intramuscular (IM) adrenaline dose followed by standard IV/IO adrenaline is associated with improved survival after OHCA. METHODS STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a before-and-after study of the implementation of an early, first-dose IM adrenaline EMS protocol for adult OHCAs. The pre-intervention period took place between January 2010 and October 2019. The post-intervention period was between November 2019 and May 2024. SETTING: Single-center urban, two-tiered EMS agency. PARTICIPANTS: Adult, nontraumatic OHCA meeting criteria for adrenaline use. INTERVENTION: Single dose (5 mg) IM adrenaline. All other care, including subsequent IV or IO adrenaline, followed international guidelines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were time from EMS arrival to the first dose of adrenaline, survival to hospital admission, and favorable neurologic function at discharge. RESULTS: Among 1450 OHCAs, 372 (29.9%) received IM adrenaline and 985 (70.1%) received usual care. Fifty-two patients received the first dose of adrenaline through the IV or IO route within the post-intervention period and were included in the standard care group analysis. Age was younger and bystander CPR was higher in the IM adrenaline group. All other characteristics were similar between IM and standard care cohorts. Time to adrenaline administration was faster for the IM cohort [(median 4.3 min (IQR 3.0-6.0) vs. 7.8 min (IQR 5.8-10.4)]. Compared with standard care, IM adrenaline was associated with improved survival to hospital admission (37.1% vs. 31.6%; aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.77), hospital survival (11.0% vs 7.0%; aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10-2.71) and favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge (9.8% vs 6.2%; aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.76). CONCLUSION: In this single-center before-and-after implementation study, an initial IM dose of adrenaline as an adjunct to standard care was associated with improved survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and functional survival. A randomized controlled trial is needed to fully assess the potential benefit of IM adrenaline delivery in OHCA.

Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA-FR-like patients) during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. METHODS: MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1-year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1-year. RESULTS: A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1-year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all-cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up. However, 1-year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA-FR-like patients.

A Clinical Review of Vasopressors in Emergency Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressor medications raise blood pressure through vasoconstriction and are essential in reversing the hypotension seen in many critically ill patients. Previously, vasopressor administration was largely limited to continuous infusions through central venous access. OBJECTIVES OF THE REVIEW: This review addresses the clinical use of vasopressors in various shock states, including practical considerations and innovations in vasopressor administration. The focus is on the clinical administration of vasopressors across a range of shock states, including hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, and obstructive shock. DISCUSSION: Criteria for starting vasopressors are not clearly defined, though early use may be beneficial. A number of physiologic factors affect the body's response to vasopressors, such as acidosis and adrenal insufficiency. Peripheral and push-dose administration of vasopressors are becoming more common. Distributive shock is characterized by inappropriate vasodilation and vasopressors play a crucial role in maintaining adequate blood pressure. The use of vasopressors is more controversial in hypovolemic shock, as the preferred treatment is correction of the volume deficit. Evidence for vasopressors is limited in cardiogenic shock. For obstructive shock, vasopressors can temporize a patient's blood pressure until definitive therapy can reverse the underlying cause. CONCLUSION: Across the categories of shock states, norepinephrine has wide applicability and is a reasonable first-line agent for shock of uncertain etiology. Keeping a broad differential when hypotension is refractory to vasopressors may help to identify adjunctive treatments in physiologic states that impair vasopressor effectiveness. Peripheral administration of vasopressors is safe and facilitates early administration, which may help to improve outcomes in some shock states.

Maintenance of beta-blockers and cardiac surgery-related outcomes: a prospective propensity-matched multicentre analysis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of maintaining beta-blockers on the day of surgery on the incidence of atrial fibrillation and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre prospective observational study with propensity matching on patients treated with beta-blockers. We collected their baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, and operative and postoperative outcomes. The endpoints were postoperative atrial fibrillation and AKI after cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Of the 1789 included patients, propensity matching led to 583 patients in each group. Maintenance of beta-blockers was not associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 0.86 [95% confidence interval 0.66-1.14], P=0.335; 141 patients [24.2%] vs 126 patients [21.6%]). Sensitivity analysis did not demonstrate association between beta-blocker maintenance and atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (odds ratio: 0.93 [95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.22], P=0.625). Maintenance of beta-blockers was associated with a higher rate of norepinephrine use (415 [71.2%] vs 465 [79.8%], P=0.0001) and postoperative AKI (124 [21.3%] vs 159 [27.3%], P=0.0127). No statistically significant difference was observed in ICU length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance of beta-blockers on the day of surgery was not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. However, maintenance of beta-blockers was associated with increased usage of vasopressors, potentially contributing to adverse postoperative renal events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04769752.

Survival, but not the severity of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, is associated with higher mean arterial blood pressure after cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: This study investigates the association between the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), vasopressor requirement, and severity of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) after cardiac arrest (CA). Methods: Between 2008 and 2017, we retrospectively analyzed the MAP 200 h after CA and quantified the vasopressor requirements using the cumulative vasopressor index (CVI). Through a postmortem brain autopsy in non-survivors, the severity of the HIE was histopathologically dichotomized into no/mild and severe HIE. In survivors, we dichotomized the severity of HIE into no/mild cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 and severe HIE (CPC 4). We investigated the regain of consciousness, causes of death, and 5-day survival as hemodynamic confounders. Results: Among the 350 non-survivors, 117 had histopathologically severe HIE while 233 had no/mild HIE, without differences observed in the MAP (73.1 vs. 72.0 mmHg, pgroup = 0.639). Compared to the non-survivors, 211 patients with CPC 1 and 57 patients with CPC 4 had higher MAP values that showed significant, but clinically non-relevant, MAP differences (81.2 vs. 82.3 mmHg, pgroup < 0.001). The no/mild HIE non-survivors (n = 54), who regained consciousness before death, had higher MAP values compared to those with no/mild HIE (n = 179), who remained persistently comatose (74.7 vs. 69.3 mmHg, pgroup < 0.001). The no/mild HIE non-survivors, who regained consciousness, required fewer vasopressors (CVI 2.1 vs. 3.6, pgroup < 0.001). Independent of the severity of HIE, the survivors were weaned faster from vasopressors (CVI 1.0). Conclusions: Although a higher MAP was associated with survival in CA patients treated with a vasopressor-supported MAP target above 65 mmHg, the severity of HIE was not. Awakening from coma was associated with less vasopressor requirements. Our results provide no evidence for a MAP target above the current guideline recommendations that can decrease the severity of HIE.

Safe administration of noradrenaline by the peripheral route: A systematic review. / Administración segura de noradrenalina por vía periférica: una revisión sistemática.

PURPOSE: To review and analyze the available literature on peripheral administration of noradrenaline (NA) with the aim of providing recommendations to ensure correct use and patient safety. METHODS: Systematic review on the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS and Science Direct, using the following search terms: ("Noradrenaline" [Mesh]) AND ("Norepinephrine" [Mesh]) AND ("Vasopressors" [Mesh]) AND ("Peripheral infusions" [Mesh]) OR ("Extravasations" [Mesh]). A total of 1,040 articles were identified. Animal studies and studies written in languages other than English were excluded. Finally, 83 articles were included. RESULTS: NA can be administered peripherally. The risk of extravasation should be taken into account, with phentolamine being the first pharmacological line of treatment. It has also been related to the appearance of thrombophlebitis, cellulitis, tissue necrosis, limb ischemia and gangrene, although its incidence seems to be low. The use of peripheral NA in children seems to be carried out without obvious complications. The use of standard concentrations is suggested to reduce the risk of errors. It is recommended to use 0.9% saline as the default diluent for peripheral NA. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral infusions of NA could be a safe and beneficial option in early resuscitation provided that a number of guidelines are followed that reduce the likelihood of complications associated with this route.

Impact of arginine-vasopressin on regional perfusions in a porcine model of post-resuscitation syndrome.

Background: Post-cardiac arrest (CA) shock is associated with multiple organ failure, including acute kidney injury, and is the leading cause of early death among patient successfully resuscitated from CA. Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) may be an interesting therapeutic alternative or complement to noradrenaline (NAD) to both control shock and preserve regional, especially renal, organ perfusions. Methods: 18 swine (24-39 kg) were submitted to 14 min of ventricular fibrillation and cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. After return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), animals randomly received either AVP, NAD or AVP-NAD combination for maintaining a targeted mean arterial pressure of 70 ± 5 mmHg for 6 h. Haemodynamic and biological parameters, including kidney function biomarkers and diuresis, were monitored throughout the follow-up. Results: Targeted mean arterial pressure was successfully obtained in the NAD (n = 6) and the AVP-NAD (n = 6) groups, but not in the AVP group (n = 6), where 4 animals died. As compared to NAD alone, renal blood flow (2.9 ± 1.15 vs 4.36 ± 0.64 mL//kg/min in NAD and AVP-NAD groups) and diuresis were higher in the AVP-NAD group. This was associated with a reduction of carotid blood flow and a more severe metabolic acidosis during the first 3 h of follow-up in the AVP-NAD group as compared to NAD group. Conclusion: Combination of AVP and NAD improved renal perfusion and diuresis but reduced carotid blood flow as compared to NAD alone in a porcine model of post-resuscitation syndrome. AVP alone failed to manage shock and led to mortality.

Relationship Between Symmetrical Peripheral Gangrene Patients and Using Vasopressors in the Intensive Care Unit.

Symmetrical peripheral gangrene (SPG) is a rare yet severe condition characterized by peripheral ischemic lesions without significant vascular occlusion. Its clinical presentation includes peripheral cyanosis, mottling, and symmetrical ischemia of distal limbs, often progressing to gangrene. Recent years have seen a rise in SPG cases, with mortality rates ranging from 40% to 90%. The condition is associated with systemic diseases, such as sepsis, vasculitis, and coagulopathy. DIC frequently complicates SPG, reflecting a disturbed procoagulant-anticoagulant balance and depletion of natural anticoagulants. While vasopressor therapy, particularly high-dose administration, has been implicated in SPG pathogenesis due to sustained vasoconstriction or idiosyncratic responses, recent evidence suggests it may not be the underlying cause. Studies indicate a low incidence of ischemic limb necrosis associated with high-dose vasopressors, with DIC and shock liver potentially explaining limb ischemia instead. The characteristic temporal interval between the onset of shock liver and limb ischemic necrosis suggests a more complex pathophysiology. The role of infectious agents, such as bacteria and viruses, in SPG pathogenesis is under investigation, with both direct vascular invasion and immune-mediated mechanisms proposed. Diagnosis involves ruling out other causes of acral gangrene through clinical examination, laboratory tests, imaging studies, and biopsy. Treatment strategies aim to halt disease progression, eliminate causative factors, and prevent complications. While anticoagulants, vasodilators, and adjunctive therapies like hyperbaric oxygen show promise, the efficacy of interventions varies, emphasizing the need for individualized management. Notably, hemoadsorption has emerged as a promising treatment, demonstrating significant improvement in SPG cases. Amputation remains a last resort option in irreversible cases. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management are crucial for improving outcomes. Further research is needed to better understand SPG's etiology and develop effective treatments through collaborative efforts.

Background factors for intra-operative hypotension during hip fracture repair surgery in the elderly under spinal anesthesia managed by orthopedic surgeons: A retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is used for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery, but frequently induces hypotension and the causative factors remain unclear. We examined background factors for the use of an intraoperative vasopressor in elderly patients receiving spinal anesthesia for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients >75 years (mean age, 87.9 years) with femoral trochanteric fractures who underwent short nail fixation under orthopedically managed spinal anesthesia at our hospital between April 2020 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (intraoperative vasopressor) and group B (no vasopressor). The following data were compared: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, years of experience as a primary surgeon, bupivacaine dose, puncture level, anesthesia time, operation time, hemoglobin level and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio on the day of surgery, brain natriuretic peptide level, left ventricular ejection fraction, and percentage of patients operated on the day of transport. RESULTS: There were 65 patients in group A and 138 in group B. The average dose of bupivacaine was 11.7 mg. In a univariate analysis, group A was slightly younger (87.0 vs. 88.3 years), had a higher blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (27.1 vs. 24.5), more frequently received ß-blockers (14.1% vs. 5.8 %) and diuretic medications (21.9% vs. 11.6 %), and had a higher puncture level. A logistic regression analysis identified younger age (p = 0.02) and diuretic medication (p = 0.001) as independent risk factors in group A. Vasopressor use was more frequent at a higher puncture level in group A (57 % for L2/3, 33 % for L3/4, 15 % for L4/5, 0 % for L5/S). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is attributed to volume deficit or extensive sympathetic blockade and may be prevented by avoiding high puncture levels and increasing preoperative fluid supplementation in patients on diuretics. There is currently no consensus on anesthetic dosages.

Processed electroencephalography-guided general anesthesia and norepinephrine requirements: A randomized trial in patients having vascular surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Processed electroencephalography (pEEG) may help clinicians optimize depth of general anesthesia. Avoiding excessive depth of anesthesia may reduce intraoperative hypotension and the need for vasopressors. We tested the hypothesis that pEEG-guided - compared to non-pEEG-guided - general anesthesia reduces the amount of norepinephrine needed to keep intraoperative mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg in patients having vascular surgery. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. PATIENTS: 110 patients having vascular surgery. INTERVENTIONS: pEEG-guided general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: Our primary endpoint was the average norepinephrine infusion rate from the beginning of induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery. MAIN RESULT: 96 patients were analyzed. The mean ± standard deviation average norepinephrine infusion rate was 0.08 ± 0.04 µg kg-1 min-1 in patients assigned to pEEG-guided and 0.12 ± 0.09 µg kg-1 min-1 in patients assigned to non-pEEG-guided general anesthesia (mean difference 0.04 µg kg-1 min-1, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.07 µg kg-1 min-1, p = 0.004). Patients assigned to pEEG-guided versus non-pEEG-guided general anesthesia, had a median time-weighted minimum alveolar concentration of 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) versus 0.8 (0.7, 0.8) (p = 0.006) and a median percentage of time Patient State Index was <25 of 12 (1, 41) % versus 23 (3, 49) % (p = 0.279). CONCLUSION: pEEG-guided - compared to non-pEEG-guided - general anesthesia reduced the amount of norepinephrine needed to keep mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg by about a third in patients having vascular surgery. Whether reduced intraoperative norepinephrine requirements resulting from pEEG-guided general anesthesia translate into improved patient-centered outcomes remains to be determined in larger trials.

Exploring the Efficacy of Midodrine for Tapering Off Vasopressors.

Sepsis and septic shock represent critical conditions, often necessitating vasopressor support in the intensive care unit (ICU). Midodrine, an oral vasopressor, has gathered attention as a potential adjunct to vasopressor therapy, aiming to facilitate weaning and improve clinical outcomes. However, the efficacy of midodrine remains questionable, with conflicting evidence from clinical trials and meta-analyses. This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on midodrine's role in ICU settings by gathering evidence from multicenter trials, retrospective studies, and meta-analyses. While some studies suggest a limited benefit of midodrine in expediting vasopressor weaning and reducing ICU/hospital stays, others report potential advantages, particularly in reducing mortality rates among septic shock patients. Ongoing efforts aim to address knowledge gaps surrounding midodrine's efficacy and safety.

The cerebral and cardiac effects of Norepinephrine in an experimental cardiac arrest model.

Introduction: Epinephrine has been the main drug recommended for decades during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). But epinephrine's ß-adrenergic effects might increase myocardial oxygen consumption and may cause arrythmias after ROSC. Norepinephrine has a weaker ß-adrenergic effect and could be useful during CPR. Studies on norepinephrine's effect on hemodynamic parameters and cerebral perfusion are scarce. This study aimed to assess norepinephrine's hemodynamic impact in an experimental model of cardiac arrest. Methods: After an initial dose study to determine the optimal dose, we conducted a prospective randomized study with 19 pigs. After 3 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, animals received boluses of 0.5 mg Epinephrine (EPI) or 1 mg Norepinephrine (NE) every 5 minutes during CPR. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), carotid blood flow (CBF) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CePP) were evaluated. Results: At baseline, hemodynamic parameters did not differ between the two groups. During CPR, CPP and CBF were similar: 17.3 (12.8; 31.8) in the EPI group vs 16.0 (11.1; 37.7) in the NE group, p = 0.9 and 28.4 (22.0; 54.8) vs 30.8 (12.2; 56.3) respectively, p = 0.9. CePP was not significantly lower during resuscitation in the NE group compared to the EPI group: 12.2 (-8.2; 42.2) vs 7.8 (-2.0; 32.0) p = 0.4. Survival rate was low with only one animal in the EPI group and 2 in the NE group. Conclusion: Cerebral perfusion pressure, coronary perfusion pressure and carotid blood flow during CPR did not significantly differ between the norepinephrine group and the epinephrine group. Further investigations should evaluate different options such as a continuous NE infusion.