A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assay for the antihypertensive agent azelnidipine in human plasma with application to clinical pharmacokinetics studies.

A robust and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC-MS/MS) assay for the high-throughput quantification of the antihypertensive drug azelnidipine in human plasma was developed and validated following bioanalytical validation guidelines. Azelnidipine and internal standard (IS), telmisartan, were extracted from human plasma by precipitation protein and separated on a C18 column using acetonitrile-methanol-ammonium formate with 0.1% formic acid as mobile phase. Detection was performed on a turbo-spray ionization source (ESI) and mass spectrometric positive multiple reaction monitoring mode (+MRM) using the respective transitions m/z 583.3 → 167.2 for azelnidipine and m/z 515.3 → 497.2 for IS. The method has a wide analytical measuring range from 0.0125 to 25 ng/mL. For the lowest limit of quantitation, low, medium and high quality controls, intra- and interassay precisions (relative standard deviation) were 3.30-7.01% and 1.78-8.09%, respectively. The drug was sufficiently stable under all relevant analytical conditions. The main metabolite of azelnidipine, M-1 (aromatized form), was monitored semiquantitatively using the typical transition m/z 581.3 → 167.2. Finally, the method was successfully applied to a clinical pharmacokinetic study in human after a single oral administration of azelnidipine 8 mg. The assay meets criteria for the analysis of samples from large research trials.

Enantioselective determination of azelnidipine in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A sensitive and simple method was developed for determination of the enantiomers of azelnidipine, (R)-(-)-azelnidipine and (S)-(+)-azelnidipine, in human plasma using chiral liquid chromatography with positive ion atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma samples spiked with stable isotope-labeled azelnidipine, [(2)H(6)]-azelnidipine, as an internal standard, were processed for analysis using a solid-phase extraction in a 96-well plate format. The azelnidipine enantiomers were separated on a chiral column containing alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein as a chiral selector under isocratic mobile phase conditions. Acquisition of mass spectrometric data was performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode, monitoring the transitions from m/z 583-->167 for (R)-(-)-azelnidipine and (S)-(+)-azelnidipine, and from m/z 589-->167 for [(2)H(6)]-azelnidipine. The standard curve was linear over the studied range (0.05-20 ng/mL), with r(2)>0.997 using weighted (1/x(2)) quadratic regression, and the chromatographic run time was 5.0 min/injection. The intra- and inter-assay precision (coefficient of variation), calculated from the assay data of the quality control samples, was 1.2-8.2% and 2.4-5.8% for (R)-(-)-azelnidipine and (S)-(+)-azelnidipine, respectively. The accuracy was 101.2-117.0% for (R)-(-)-azelnidipine and 100.0-107.0% for (S)-(+)-azelnidipine. The overall recoveries for (R)-(-)-azelnidipine and (S)-(+)-azelnidipine were 71.4-79.7% and 71.7-84.2%, respectively. The lower limit of quantification for both enantiomers was 0.05 ng/mL using 1.0 mL of plasma. All the analytes showed acceptable short-term, long-term, auto-sampler and stock solution stability. Furthermore, the method described above was used to separately measure the concentrations of the azelnidipine enantiomers in plasma samples collected from healthy subjects who had received a single oral dose of 16 mg of azelnidipine.

Determination of azelnidipine in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.

A liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) method for the determination of azelnidipine in human plasma was established. Nicardipine was used as the internal standard (IS). After adjustment to a basic pH with sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 M), plasma samples were extracted with cyclohexane-diethyl ether (1:1, v/v) and separated on a C(18) column with a mobile phase of 20 mM ammonium acetate solution-methanol-formic acid (25:75:0.5, v/v). The electrospray ionization was employed in a single quadrupole mass spectrometer for the determination. The method was linear over the concentration range of 0.05-40 ng/ml. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.05 ng/ml. The intra- and inter-run standard deviations were less than 9.5% and 11.0%, respectively. The method was successfully applied to study the pharmacokinetics of azelnidipine in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Simultaneous determination of azelnidipine and two metabolites in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A quantitative assay method by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS) for the simultaneous determination of azelnidipine and its two metabolites, M-1 (aromatized form) and M-2 (hydroxylated form), in human plasma was developed and validated. Plasma samples, each of 1.0mL, were extracted by a single step liquid-liquid extraction using a mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane (1:1, v/v), and analyzed by the LC/ESI-MS/MS method. Three analytes were separated by isocratic elution on a C(18) column, and ionized using a positive ion electrospray ionization source. The ion transitions were monitored in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. The chromatographic run time was 11min per injection, with retention time of 3.6, 10.2 and 6.8min for azelnidipine, M-1 and M-2, respectively. The calibration curves for azelnidipine, M-1 and M-2 well fitted to equations by a weighted (1/X(2)) quadratic regression over the range of 0.5-40.0ng/mL (r(2)>0.9979). The intra- and inter-assay precisions (coefficient of variation: C.V.), calculated from quality control (QC) samples, were less than 8.7 and 8.4%, 3.8 and 4.7%, and 11.9 and 13.9%, respectively, for azelnidipine, M-1 and M-2. The accuracy was within +/-9% for azelnidipine, within +/-7% for M-1 and within +/-16% for M-2. The overall recoveries for azelnidipine, M-1 and M-2 were 68.8-78.6%, 54.3-62.9% and 80.4-89.7%, respectively. All analytes evaluated demonstrated acceptable short-term, long-term, auto-sampler and stock solution stabilities. Furthermore, the method developed was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic studies on azelnidipine, M-1 and M-2 after an oral dose of 16mg CALBLOCK tablets (2mgx8mg tablets) to healthy volunteers.

Azelnidipine and amlodipine: a comparison of their pharmacokinetics and effects on ambulatory blood pressure.

We objected: 1) To compare the effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine on 24-h blood pressure; 2) To monitor the plasma concentration vs. the time profile in order to assess the association between pharmacokinetics and hypotensive activity after administration of either drug for 6 weeks. Blood pressure and pulse rate were measured by 24-h monitoring with a portable automatic monitor in a randomized double-blind study of 46 patients with essential hypertension. Azelnidipine 16 mg (23 patients) or amlodipine 5 mg (23 patients) was administered once daily for 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed after the last dose was taken. Both drugs showed similar effects on the office blood pressure and pulse rate. During 24-h monitoring, both drugs caused a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 13 mmHg and had a similar hypotensive profile during the daytime period (07:00-21:30). The pulse rate decreased by 2 beats/min in the azelnidipine group, whereas it significantly increased by 4 beats/min in the amlodipine group. Similar trends in the blood pressure and pulse rate were observed during the nighttime (22:00-6:30) and over 24 h. Excessive blood pressure reduction during the nighttime was not seen in either group. The pharmacokinetic results indicated that the plasma half-life (t1/2) of amlodipine was 38.5 +/- 19.8 h and that of azelnidipine was 8.68 +/- 1.33 h. Despite this difference in pharmacokinetics, the hypotensive effects of amlodipine and azelnidipine were similar throughout the 24-h administration period.

Incorporation of L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid into hemoglobin S in sickle erythrocytes in vitro.

L-Azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, the naturally occurring lower homologue of L-proline, is incorporated into hemoglobin S (sickle hemoglobin) in vitro. Sickle erythrocytes from patients with sickle cell anemia incubated with L-[3H] azetidine-2-carboxylate synthesized radiolabeled hemoglobin which when isolated from cell lysates, co-chromatographed with hemoglobin S on DEAE-cellulose columns. The alpha/beta ratio of azetidine carboxylate incorporation into the globin chains of sickle hemoglobin was 0.94, which is consistent with the presence of four proline residues in each polypeptide chain. Incorporation of azetidine carboxylate into hot trichloroacetic acid-insoluble material in sickle erythrocytes indicated that the homologue was present in the polypeptide backbone of the globin chains of sickle hemoglobin. Amino acid analysis of the hot trichloroacetic acid-insoluble material from sickle erythrocytes which had been incubated with radiolabeled azetidine carboxylate indicated that 75% of the radioactivity could be accounted for as intact homologue while 20% of the radioactivity co-chromatographed with alanine. These results suggest that azetidine carboxylate is incorporated unaltered into hemoglobin S in addition to being metabolized to alanine in sickle erythrocytes prior to incorporation into protein. The kinetics of thermal precipitation of hemoglobin S (oxygen ligand) into which radioactive azetidine carboxylate or radioactive proline had been incorporated in vitro is identical. This observation, together with the behavior of hemoglobin S and the globin chains from hemoglobin S containing azetidine carboxylate during ion-exchange chromatography, indicates that homologue replacement of prolyl residues does not significantly alter the overall charge or stability of the hemoglobin S tetramer. Azetidine carboxylate did not inhibit uptake of radiolabeled proline by sickle erythrocytes suggesting that the homologue does not adversely affect amino acid transport in these cells.