Iris Posterior Synechiae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Eyes: Prevention and Management of Posterior Synechiae.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a mydriatic agent for posterior synechiae after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (staged DMEK). METHODS: In this prospective study, the outcomes of DMEK with or without mydriasis (0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride [Mydrin-P; Santen, Osaka, Japan]) after the DMEK procedure were analyzed. Patients underwent IOL implantation approximately 4 weeks before DMEK. Six months after DMEK, the iris posterior synechiae severity score was evaluated based on the extent of posterior synechiae affecting the eight areas (45° each) of the pupillary rim (posterior synechiae score; grades 0-8). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, axial length, and the amount of air at the end of the surgery were also evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients (mydriatic: n=8, control: n=7) were eligible for inclusion. Iris posterior synechiae were detected in all seven eyes (100.0%) in the control group, whereas they were noted in two eyes in the mydriatic group (25%). The mean iris posterior synechiae score was 0.69±1.20 in the mydriatic group and was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.57±0.90; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in other clinical factors. Although the incidence and scores of posterior synechiae in the control group were higher, the incidence was significantly reduced with the use of a mydriatic agent (in the mydriatic group). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a mydriatic agent is an effective measure to prevent postoperative synechiae after DMEK.

Impact of Race on the Surgical Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) represents roughly 15% of admissions by general surgeons. Management of SBO relies heavily on provider judgment, including decisions on how long to try nonsurgical management and whether to use a laparoscopic or open approach when surgery is needed. Given the subjective nature of these decisions, it is unknown if patient race influences management of SBO. STUDY DESIGN: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients who underwent adhesiolysis or small bowel resection for adhesive SBO between 2010 and 2015 (n = 13,896). Adjusted logistic regression models incorporating patient comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and emergency status were used to analyze odds of receiving surgery after 5 days from hospital admission (Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma guidelines) and of undergoing an open operation. RESULTS: Patients who waited more than 5 days for a procedure had greater adjusted odds of postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.56 95% CI 1.37 to 1.79) compared with those waiting 5 days or less. Similarly, open procedures had higher odds of complication compared with laparoscopic (OR 2.31 95% CI 2.00 to 2.68). Regression analysis demonstrated that black patients were significantly more likely than white patients to wait more than 5 days for surgery (OR 1.31 95% CI [1.13-1.53]) and undergo open surgery (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.79). There was no statistical difference for Hispanics patients waiting more than 5 days (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.31) or receiving open surgery (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.01) compared with white patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decisions regarding SBO management differ based on patient race. Future studies focusing on the surgical decision-making process and the influence of bias are needed.

Prospective study of intraabdominal adhesions among women of different races with or without keloids.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate postsurgical adhesions in women of different races with or without keloids. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study evaluating postsurgical adhesions after a cesarean delivery in 429 women with or without keloids. The outcome measures were the prevalence and extent of adhesions in women of different races with or without keloids. RESULTS: There was no difference in the prevalence of adhesions and adhesion score in various sites among women of different races. Compared with whites (0.5%), keloids were significantly more common in African Americans (7.1%; P = .007; odds ratio, 16.5) and in Asians (5.2%; P = .02; odds ratio, 11.9). Women with keloids were found to have more dense adhesions between the uterus and the bladder (P = .028; 95% confidence interval, 0-12) and between the uterus and the anterior abdominal wall (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval, 8-12). CONCLUSION: The prevalence and degree of postsurgical adhesions in women of different races are comparable. Women with keloids on the cesarean scar have increased adhesions between the uterus and the bladder and between the uterus and the abdominal wall.