Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastases from the randomized DESTINY-Breast03 trial.

BACKGROUND: DESTINY-Breast03 is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. A statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus T-DM1 was reported in the primary analysis. Here, we report exploratory efficacy data in patients with and without brain metastases (BMs) at baseline. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg. Patients with clinically inactive/asymptomatic BMs were eligible. Lesions were measured as per modified RECIST, version 1.1. Outcomes included PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR), objective response rate (ORR), and intracranial ORR as per BICR. RESULTS: As of 21 May 2021, 43/261 patients randomized to T-DXd and 39/263 patients randomized to T-DM1 had BMs at baseline, as per investigator assessment. Among patients with baseline BMs, 20/43 in the T-DXd arm and 19/39 in the T-DM1 arm had not received prior local BM treatment. For patients with BMs, median PFS was 15.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-22.2 months] for T-DXd versus 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8-5.8 months) for T-DM1; hazard ratio (HR) 0.25 (95% CI 0.13-0.45). For patients without BMs, median PFS was not reached (95% CI 22.4 months-not estimable) for T-DXd versus 7.1 months (95% CI 5.6-9.7 months) for T-DM1; HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.22-0.40). Confirmed systemic ORR was 67.4% for T-DXd versus 20.5% for T-DM1 and 82.1% for T-DXd versus 36.6% for T-DM1 for patients with and without BMs, respectively. Intracranial ORR was 65.7% with T-DXd versus 34.3% with T-DM1. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HER2-positive mBC whose disease progressed after trastuzumab and a taxane achieved a substantial benefit from treatment with T-DXd compared with T-DM1, including those with baseline BMs.

Effects of trastuzumab emtansine on canine urothelial carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract in dogs and has aggressive behaviour. Although human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a known therapeutic target with evidence in canine UC, the efficacy of anti-HER2 antibody drugs remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of anti-HER2 antibody drugs including trastuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) on canine UC cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Four canine UC cell lines (Nene, TCCUB, Love, and Sora) were used. In western blotting, HER2 protein expression was observed in all the cell lines. Although both trastuzumab and T-DM1 showed dose-dependent growth inhibitory activity in the cell lines, T-DM1 showed much stronger activity than that of trastuzumab. In flow cytometry analyses with the canine UC cell line (Sora), T-DM1 but not trastuzumab significantly increased the percentages of early and late apoptotic cells in annexin V apoptotic assays and the sub-G1 phase fraction in cell cycle analyses. For the in vivo experiment, the canine UC cells (Sora) were subcutaneously injected into nude mice. Four days after inoculation, trastuzumab, T-DM1, or vehicle was administered intraperitoneally once a week for three times. Tumour volumes were significantly smaller in the T-DM1 group compared to the trastuzumab and vehicle control groups. These findings indicate that T-DM1 exerts a stronger antitumour effect than that of trastuzumab on canine UC cells in vitro and in vivo, possibly by inducing apoptosis due to DM1.

Incidence of antibody-drug conjugate-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported the efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treating breast cancer. However, during cytotoxic drug treatment, long-term disabling fatigue is common. Moreover, studies in the relevant literature have indicated that fatigue can significantly increase the incidence of depression and sleep disorders. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence of fatigue in breast cancer survivors treated with ADCs. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles and conference abstracts published before March 16, 2023. Further, two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of all-grade fatigue caused by the use of ADCs in patients with breast cancer. Finally, a random-effects model was used to calculate the incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 7963 patients from 31 studies were included in this meta-analysis to assess the incidence of fatigue caused by the use of approved and marketed ADCs in patients with breast cancer. Notably, the incidence of all-grade fatigue during ADC monotherapy was 39.84% (95% CI, 35.09%-44.69%). In subgroup analyses, among ADCs, the incidence of trastuzumab deruxtecan-induced fatigue was the highest, with an all-grade fatigue incidence of 47.05% (95% CI, 42.38%-51.75%). Meanwhile, the incidence of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-induced all-grade fatigue was 35.17% (95% CI, 28.87%-41.74%), which was the lowest among ADCs. Further, the incidence of all-grade fatigue due to sacituzumab govitecan was 42.82% (95% CI, 34.54%-51.32%), which was higher than that due to T-DM1. Moreover, the incidence of fatigue was higher with T-DM1 combination therapy than with monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have highlighted the high incidence of ADC-related fatigue and its negative impact on patients' physical and mental health, making fatigue an important research variable. The results of this study will further contribute to a comprehensive understanding of ADCs, which have some clinical importance and are of great benefit to patients with breast cancer.

Comparison of trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and disitamab vedotin in a multiresistant HER2-positive breast cancer lung metastasis model.

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with lung metastases resistant to targeted agents is a common therapeutic challenge. Absence of preclinical lung metastasis models that are resistant to multiple anti-HER2 targeted drugs hampers the development of novel therapies. We established a novel HER2-positive breast cancer cell line (L-JIMT-1) with a high propensity to form lung metastases from the parenteral JIMT-1 cell line by injecting JIMT-1 cells into immunodeficient SCID mice. Lung metastases developed in all mice injected with L-JIMT-1 cells, and more rapidly and in greater numbers compared with the parental JIMT-1 cells. L-JIMT-1 cells expressed more epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2 than JIMT-1 cells. L-JIMT-1 cells were resistant to all five tyrosine kinase inhibitors tested in vitro (afatinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, sapitinib, and tucatinib). When we compared JIMT-1 and L-JIMT-1 sensitivity to three HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and disitamab vedotin (DV) in vitro, JIMT-1 cells were resistant T-DXd, partially sensitive to T-DM1, and sensitive to DV, while L-JIMT-1 cells were resistant to both T-DM1 and T-DXd, but moderately sensitive to DV. In a mouse model, all three ADCs inhibited the growth of L-JIMT-1 lung metastases compared to a vehicle, but DV and T-DXd more strongly than T-DM1, and DV treatment led to the smallest tumor burden. The L-JIMT breast cancer lung metastasis model developed may be useful in the evaluation of anti-cancer agents for multiresistant HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Targeting TACC3 Induces Immunogenic Cell Death and Enhances T-DM1 Response in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) was the first and one of the most successful antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) approved for treating refractory HER2-positive breast cancer. Despite its initial clinical efficacy, resistance is unfortunately common, necessitating approaches to improve response. Here, we found that in sensitive cells, T-DM1 induced spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)-dependent immunogenic cell death (ICD), an immune-priming form of cell death. The payload of T-DM1 mediated ICD by inducing eIF2α phosphorylation, surface exposure of calreticulin, ATP and HMGB1 release, and secretion of ICD-related cytokines, all of which were lost in resistance. Accordingly, ICD-related gene signatures in pretreatment samples correlated with clinical response to T-DM1-containing therapy, and increased infiltration of antitumor CD8+ T cells in posttreatment samples was correlated with better T-DM1 response. Transforming acidic coiled-coil containing 3 (TACC3) was overexpressed in T-DM1-resistant cells, and T-DM1 responsive patients had reduced TACC3 protein expression whereas nonresponders exhibited increased TACC3 expression during T-DM1 treatment. Notably, genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of TACC3 restored T-DM1-induced SAC activation and induction of ICD markers in vitro. Finally, TACC3 inhibition in vivo elicited ICD in a vaccination assay and potentiated the antitumor efficacy of T-DM1 by inducing dendritic cell maturation and enhancing intratumoral infiltration of cytotoxic T cells. Together, these results illustrate that ICD is a key mechanism of action of T-DM1 that is lost in resistance and that targeting TACC3 can restore T-DM1-mediated ICD and overcome resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: Loss of induction of immunogenic cell death in response to T-DM1 leads to resistance that can be overcome by targeting TACC3, providing an attractive strategy to improve the efficacy of T-DM1.

Prevalence and Therapeutic Targeting of High-Level ERBB2 Amplification in NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: ERBB2 amplification in lung cancer remains poorly characterized. HER2 (encoded by ERBB2) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase capable of ligand-independent dimerization and signaling when overexpressed, and a common cause of HER2 overexpression is ERBB2 amplification. Here, we evaluated the clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of ERBB2-amplified NSCLC and explored a HER2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapeutic strategy. METHODS: Our institutional next-generation DNA sequencing data (OncoPanel) from 5769 NSCLC samples (5075 patients) were queried for cases having high-level ERBB2 amplification (≥6 copies). Clinical and demographic characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical records. Efficacy of the pan-ERBB inhibitor afatinib or HER2 ADCs (trastuzumab deruxtecan and trastuzumab emtansine) was evaluated in NSCLC preclinical models and patients with ERBB2 amplification. RESULTS: High-level ERBB2 amplification was identified in 0.9% of lung adenocarcinomas and reliably predicted overexpression of HER2. ERBB2 amplification events are detected in two distinct clinicopathologic and genomic subsets of NSCLC: as the sole mitogenic driver in tumors arising in patients with a smoking history or as a concomitant alteration with other mitogenic drivers in patients with a light or never smoking history. We further reveal that trastuzumab deruxtecan is effective therapy in in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of NSCLC harboring ERBB2 amplification and report two cases of clinical activity of an anti-HER2 ADC in patients who acquired ERBB2 amplification after previous targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: High-level ERBB2 amplification reliably predicts HER2 overexpression in patients with NSCLC, and HER2 ADC is effective therapy in this population.

Management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after trastuzumab deruxtecan failure.

The current treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been greatly impacted in the past decade by the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which represent a relatively novel therapeutic class with the peculiar ability to deliver otherwise overtly toxic chemotherapeutics to tumor sites by exploiting the specificities of monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, drug engineering refinements in ADC design, such as through the introduction of cleavable linkers and hydrophobic payloads, resulted in improved patient outcomes in recent years. Two different ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have already entered clinical practice for the treatment of HER2-positive ABC. In this scenario, T-DXd has shown to portend better survival outcomes compared to T-DM1, while leaving a large unsought area of unmet medical need upon T-DXd failure. Treatment decision and benefit of cancer drugs following T-DXd still represent an area of clinical controversy, where a preclinical investigation and clinical development should be prioritized. As the pace of innovation is currently accelerating, and with novel ADC formulations advancing in early-phase clinical trials, the whole BC field is changing at an unprecedented rate, with potential broadenings of therapeutic indications. In this review, we present the clinical landscape of HER2-positive advanced BC and discuss our vision on how to tackle T-DXd resistance, providing a perspective on the priority areas of the cancer research in this setting.

Immuno-PET Detects Antibody-Drug Potency on Coadministration with Statins.

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeting trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) are antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) clinically used to treat HER2-positive breast cancer, with the latter receiving clinical approval in 2021 for HER2-positive gastric cancer. Lovastatin, a cholesterol-lowering drug, temporally elevates cell-surface HER2 in ways that enhance HER2-ADC binding and internalization. Methods: In an NCIN87 gastric xenograft model and a gastric patient-derived xenograft model, we used the 89Zr-labeled or 64Cu-labeled anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab to investigate the dosing regimen of ADC therapy with and without coadministration of lovastatin. We compared the ADC efficacy of a multiple-dose ADC regime, which replicates the clinical dose regimen standard, with a single-dose regime. Results: T-DM1/lovastatin treatment inhibited tumor growth, regardless of multiple- or single-dose T-DM1 administration. Coadministration of lovastatin with T-DM1 or T-DXd as a single dose enhanced tumor growth inhibition, which was accompanied by a decrease in signal on HER2-targeted immuno-PET and a decrease in HER2-mediated signaling at the cellular level. DNA damage signaling was increased on ADC treatment in vitro. Conclusion: Our data from a gastric cancer xenograft show the utility of HER2-targeted immuno-PET to inform the tumor response to ADC therapies in combination with modulators of cell-surface target availability. Our studies also demonstrate that statins enhance ADC efficacy in both a cell-line and a patient-derived xenograft model in ways that enable a single-dose administration of the ADC.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.

The treatment of cancer patients has dramatically changed over the past decades with the advent of monoclonal antibodies, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and innovative T-cell therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have also revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Several ADCs have already been approved in hematology and clinical oncology, such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and enfortumab vedotin (EV) for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. The efficacy of ADCs is limited by the emergence of resistance due to different mechanisms, such as antigen-related resistance, failure of internalization, impaired lysosomal function, and other mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the clinical data that contributed to the approval of T-DM1, T-DXd, SG, and EV. We also discuss the different mechanisms of resistance to ADCs, as well as the ways to overcome this resistance, such as bispecific ADCs and the combination of ADCs with immune-checkpoint inhibitors or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.

The evolving therapeutic landscape of trastuzumab-drug conjugates: Future perspectives beyond HER2-positive breast cancer.

A novel class of drugs, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), are now rapidly emerging as highly effective treatments for solid tumours. ADCs conjugate conventional chemotherapeutics with highly selective targeted monoclonal antibodies. Anti-HER2 therapies selectively target cancer cells expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), among them trastuzumab has been the first HER2-targeting monoclonal antibody to achieve successful results that made it the backbone of anti-HER2 therapies. Trastuzumab drug conjugates (T-DCs), use trastuzumab as a selective antibody to lead cytotoxic drugs inside cancer cells. Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd) are the two approved T-DCs. T-Dxd along with other five T-DCs represents "second generation ADCs" that has been firstly tested in HER2 positive breast cancer (BC) and then in HER2-low BC and other cancers showing promising results thanks to extraordinary and innovative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The evidence generated so far are establishing them as a completely new class of agents effective in solid cancer treatments but also warrants physicians against unconventional toxicity profiles. The role of T-DCs in HER2-positive BC has been largely reviewed, while in this review, we provided for the first time in literature an overview of trastuzumab drug conjugates (T-DCs) approved and/or in clinical development with a specific focus on their efficacy and safety profile in HER2-low BC and other solid tumours different from BC. We started by analysing T-DCs biological characteristics that underly the differences in T-DCs pharmacodynamics and safety profile, then presented the main evidence on the activity and efficacy of these emerging T-DCs in HER2-low BC and other HER2 overexpressing and/or mutated solid tumours and lastly, we provided an overview of the complex and still evolving scenario in which these compounds should be allocated. A specific focus on possible combination strategies with other drugs such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy and target therapy, to increase T-DCs activity and eventually overcome future upcoming resistance mechanisms, are here also critically reviewed.

Antibody-drug Conjugates for Breast Cancer Treatment.

The use of antibody-drug conjugates is expected to transform the management of human malignancy. Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer treatment are designed to deliver anticancer drugs to tumor cells. The main components of such conjugates are a monoclonal antibody that binds to a tumor antigen, an anticancer drug to inhibit tumor cell growth and a linker that serves to conjugate the antibody and drug. The antibody-drug conjugates developed and approved for breast cancer treatment are ado-trastuzumab emtansine, (fam)-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki and sacituzumab govitecan. The mechanisms of action, clinical uses and toxic effects of these antibody-drug conjugates are discussed.

YES1 as a Therapeutic Target for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer after Trastuzumab and Trastuzumab-Emtansine (T-DM1) Resistance Development.

Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) is a therapeutic agent molecularly targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and it is especially effective for MBC with resistance to trastuzumab. Although several reports have described T-DM1 resistance, few have examined the mechanism underlying T-DM1 resistance after the development of acquired resistance to trastuzumab. We previously reported that YES1, a member of the Src family, plays an important role in acquired resistance to trastuzumab in HER2-amplified breast cancer cells. We newly established a trastuzumab/T-DM1-dual-resistant cell line and analyzed the resistance mechanisms in this cell line. At first, the T-DM1 effectively inhibited the YES1-amplified trastuzumab-resistant cell line, but resistance to T-DM1 gradually developed. YES1 amplification was further enhanced after acquired resistance to T-DM1 became apparent, and the knockdown of the YES1 or the administration of the Src inhibitor dasatinib restored sensitivity to T-DM1. Our results indicate that YES1 is also strongly associated with T-DM1 resistance after the development of acquired resistance to trastuzumab, and the continuous inhibition of YES1 is important for overcoming resistance to T-DM1.

Impact of the line of treatment on progression-free survival in patients treated with T-DM1 for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is indicated as second-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast cancer, after progression on trastuzumab and a taxane-based chemotherapy. We wished to determine if the line of treatment in which T-DM1 is administered has an impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and in particular, if prior treatment with capecitabine/lapatinib or pertuzumab modifies PFS of further treatment with T-DM1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study in 3 Belgian institutions. We evaluated PFS with T-DM1 in patients treated for HER2 positive metastatic or locally advanced unresectable breast cancer between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016. RESULTS: We included 51 patients. The median PFS was 9.01 months. The line of treatment in which T-DM1 (1st line, 2nd line, 3rd line or 4+ lines) was administered had no influence on PFS (hazard ratio 0.979, CI95: 0.835-1.143). There was no significant difference in PFS whether or not patients had received prior treatment with capecitabine/lapatinib (9.17 vs 5.56 months, p-value 0.875). But, patients who received pertuzumab before T-DM1 tended to exhibit a shorter PFS (3.55 months for T-DM1 after pertuzumab vs 9.50 months for T-DM1 without pretreatment with pertuzumab), even if this difference was not statistically significant (p-value 0.144). CONCLUSION: Unlike with conventional chemotherapy, the line of treatment in which T-DM1 is administered does not influence PFS in our cohort of patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

Antibody drug conjugates for patients with breast cancer.

The receptor-based classification of breast cancer predicts its optimal therapy. Hormone Receptor (HR) positive breast cancer is treated with endocrine therapy, and HER2+ disease is treated with HER2-targeted therapy. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined as tumors lacking HR and HER2, represents an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis. Development of targeted therapy for this subtype has been challenging since TNBC usually lacks targetable genomic alterations. However, the advent of antibody drug conjugates (ADC) to target antigens overexpressed in breast cancer has opened the door to a new class of breast cancer therapeutics. In this review, we describe the current FDA-approved ADC therapies for breast cancer, including sacituzumab govitecan, as well as agents currently in advanced stages of investigation. In addition, we review the potential therapeutic application of ADCs across different breast cancer subtypes. In the future, therapeutic advances in ADCs targeting different antigens could redefine the current receptor-based classification of breast cancer.

Efficacy of tucatinib for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after HER2-targeted therapy: a network meta-analysis.

Aim: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients receiving therapy for HER2+ unresectable/metastatic breast cancer after ≥1 HER2-directed therapy was conducted to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Hazard ratios (HRs) and relative differences from fractional polynomials (FPs) for PFS and OS were assessed by Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: For PFS, surface under the cumulative rankogram (SUCRA) ranked tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine as highest in both HR and FP analyses, followed by T-DM1 monotherapy and neratinib plus capecitabine. For OS, SUCRA ranked tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine as highest in both HR and FP analyses, followed by pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with capecitabine and T-DM1 monotherapy, with similar scores. Conclusion: Tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine, and T-DM1 monotherapy, consistently showed improved PFS and OS versus lapatinib/trastuzumab plus capecitabine and non-targeted treatments.

Lay abstract Although several therapies are used in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, direct head-to-head comparisons of these therapies are lacking. We conducted a network meta-analysis, a way of indirectly comparing the results of different clinical trials, to compare how long patients receiving therapy had no disease progression, and also how long patients survived. In terms of avoiding disease progression, tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine ranked highest, followed by T-DM1 monotherapy and neratinib plus capecitabine. In terms of survival, tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine ranked highest, followed by pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with capecitabine and T-DM1. Tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab plus capecitabine and also T-DM1 monotherapy consistently demonstrated improved progression-free and overall survival outcomes compared with other therapies.

Real-world effectiveness of post-trastuzumab emtansine treatment in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective observational study (KBCSG-TR 1917).

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a second-line standard therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Evidence regarding post-T-DM1 treatments is currently lacking. We evaluated the effectiveness of post-T-DM1 drug therapy in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study, real-world clinical data of female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who had a history of T-DM1 treatment were consecutively collected from five sites in Japan. We investigated the effectiveness of post-T-DM1 therapy by evaluating the real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Tumor response was assessed by investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) guidelines. Subgroup and exploratory analyses according to background factors were also undertaken. RESULTS: Of the 205 patients who received T-DM1 treatment between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018, 128 were included in this study. Among the 128 patients analyzed, 105 (82%) patients received anti-HER2 therapy and 23 (18%) patients received regimens without anti-HER2 therapy. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS, TTF, and OS were 5.7 (4.8-6.9) months, 5.6 (4.6-6.4) months, and 22.8 (18.2-32.4) months, respectively. CBR and ORR (95% CI) were 48% (38.8-56.7) and 23% (15.1-31.4), respectively. Cox-regression analysis showed that an ECOG PS score of 0, a HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 3+, recurrent type, ≥12 month duration of T-DM1 therapy, and anti-HER2 therapy were independent variables for rwPFS. An exploratory subgroup analysis of regimens after T-DM1 showed that those with anti-HER2 therapy had a median rwPFS of 6.3 and those without anti-HER2 therapy had a median rwPFS of 4.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world setting in Japan, several post-T-DM1 regimens for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, including continuation of anti-HER2 therapy, showed some effectiveness; however, this effectiveness was insufficient. Novel therapeutic options are still needed for further improvement of PFS and OS in later treatment settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000038296 ; registered on 15 October 2019.

Transient Competitive Inhibition Bypasses the Binding Site Barrier to Improve Tumor Penetration of Trastuzumab and Enhance T-DM1 Efficacy.

Poor penetration of mAbs in solid tumors is explained, in part, by the binding site barrier hypothesis. Following extravasation, mAbs rapidly bind cellular antigens, leading to the observation that, at subsaturating doses, therapeutic antibody in solid tumors localizes around tumor vasculature. Here we report a unique strategy to overcome the binding site barrier through transient competitive inhibition of antibody-antigen binding. The anti-trastuzumab single domain antibody 1HE was identified through in vitro binding assays as a model inhibitor. Coadministration of 1HE did not alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in vivo. Administration of 1HE alone was rapidly eliminated with a terminal plasma half-life of 1.2 hours, while coadministrations of 1HE with trastuzumab had a terminal half-life of 56 hours. In mice harboring SKOV3 xenografts, coadministration of 1HE with trastuzumab led to significant increases in both penetration of trastuzumab from vasculature and the percentage of tumor area that stained positive for trastuzumab. 1HE coadministered with a single dose of T-DM1 to NCI-N87 xenograft-bearing mice significantly enhanced T-DM1 efficacy, increasing median survival. These results support the hypothesis that transient competitive inhibition can improve therapeutic antibody distribution in solid tumors and enhance antibody efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE: This study describes the development of a transient competitive inhibition strategy that enhances the tumor penetration and efficacy of anticancer antibodies.See related commentary by van Dongen, p. 3956.

Targeting the autophagy promoted antitumor effect of T-DM1 on HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody-drug conjugate consisted of the HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and the tubulin inhibitor emtansine, has shown potent therapeutic value in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). However, a clinical trial indicated that T-DM1 exerts a limited effect on HER2-positive gastric cancer (GC), but the underlying mechanism is inconclusive. Our research attempted to reveal the probable mechanism and role of autophagy in T-DM1-treated HER2-positive GC. In this study, our results showed that T-DM1 induced apoptosis and exhibited potent therapeutic efficacy in HER2-positive GC cells. In addition, autophagosomes were observed by transmission electron microscopy. Autophagy was markedly activated and exhibited the three characterized gradations of autophagic flux, consisting of the formation of autophagosomes, the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, and the deterioration of autophagosomes in autolysosomes. More importantly, autophagic inhibition by the suppressors 3-methyladenine (3-MA) and LY294002 significantly potentiated cytotoxicity and apoptosis in HER2-positive GC cells in vitro, while the combined use of LY294002 and T-DM1 elicited potent anti-GC efficacy in vivo. In mechanistic experiments, immunoblot analysis indicated the downregulated levels of Akt, mTOR, and P70S6K and confocal microscopy analysis clearly showed that autophagic inhibition promoted the fusion of T-DM1 molecules with lysosomes in GC cells. In conclusion, our research demonstrated that T-DM1 induced apoptosis as well as cytoprotective autophagy, and autophagic inhibition could potentiate the antitumor effect of T-DM1 on HER2-positive GC. Furthermore, autophagic inhibition might increase the fusion of T-DM1 with lysosomes, which might accelerate the release of the cytotoxic molecule emtansine from the T-DM1 conjugate. These findings highlight a promising therapeutic strategy that combines T-DM1 with an autophagy inhibitor to treat HER-positive GC more efficiently.