Autologous Transplantation, Consolidation, and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Results of the BMT CTN 0702 Trial.

PURPOSE: Single-cycle melphalan 200 mg/m2 and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) followed by lenalidomide (len) maintenance have improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We designed a prospective, randomized, phase III study to test additional interventions to improve PFS by comparing AHCT, tandem AHCT (AHCT/AHCT), and AHCT and four subsequent cycles of len, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD; AHCT + RVD), all followed by len until disease progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic MM within 12 months from starting therapy and without progression who were age 70 years or younger were randomly assigned to AHCT/AHCT + len (n = 247), AHCT + RVD + len (n = 254), or AHCT + len (n = 257). The primary end point was 38-month PFS. RESULTS: The study population had a median age of 56 years (range, 20 to 70 years); 24% of patients had high-risk MM, 73% had a triple-drug regimen as initial therapy, and 18% were in complete response at enrollment. The 38-month PFS rate was 58.5% (95% CI, 51.7% to 64.6%) for AHCT/AHCT + len, 57.8% (95% CI, 51.4% to 63.7%) for AHCT + RVD + len, and 53.9% (95% CI, 47.4% to 60%) for AHCT + len. For AHCT/AHCT + len, AHCT + RVD + len, and AHCT + len, the OS rates were 81.8% (95% CI, 76.2% to 86.2%), 85.4% (95% CI, 80.4% to 89.3%), and 83.7% (95% CI, 78.4% to 87.8%), respectively, and the complete response rates at 1 year were 50.5% (n = 192), 58.4% (n = 209), and 47.1% (n = 208), respectively. Toxicity profiles and development of second primary malignancies were similar across treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Second AHCT or RVD consolidation as post-AHCT interventions for the up-front treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with MM did not improve PFS or OS. Single AHCT and len should remain as the standard approach for this population.

Retrospective study of the digestive tract mucositis derived from myeloablative and non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditionings with busulfan in hematopoietic cell transplantation patient.

Busulfan is a major component of chemotherapy conditioning in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This alkylating agent is highly toxic at myeloablative doses, exposing HCT patients to risks of mortality. Non-myeloablative (NMA) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) using busulfan have shown impaired toxicity. However, the toxicity of NMA/RIC in the digestive tract is poorly described. This study aimed to characterize the mucositis in the oral cavity (OM), oropharynx/esophagus, and gastrointestinal tract derived from conditionings with myeloablative and non-myeloablative doses of busulfan. We retrospectively retrieved clinical data of HCT patients (n = 100) who underwent myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or NMA/RIC with busulfan. Frequency and time duration of mucositis in the oral cavity and oropharynx/esophagus, diarrhea, and prescription of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and opioids were also collected. OM severity (p = 0.009) and time duration of mucositis in oropharynx/esophagus (p = 0.022) were frequently higher in MAC than NMA/RIC. A myeloablative dose of busulfan was a risk factor for OM grade ≥ 2 (OR = 4.8, p = 0.002) and for mucositis in oropharynx/esophagus ≥ 5 days (OR = 2.64, p = 0.035). A longer duration of mucositis in the oropharynx/esophagus was also associated with an increase in the prescription of opioids (OR = 7.10, p < 0.001).Overall survival (OS) in MAC was significantly higher than that in NMA/RIC (p = 0.017). No variables related to mucositis interfere significantly in OS. In conclusion, myelosuppression in busulfan-based regimens are predisposed to a high risk for severe OM and to prolonged mucositis in the oropharynx/esophagus.

Minimal incidence of neurotoxicity without prophylaxis during busulfan-based conditioning regimen in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation.

Busulfan (Bu), an alkylating agent, has been used in pre-transplant conditioning regimens since the 1950s, due to its potent myeloablative effect. Questions have been raised regarding oral or intravenous formulations, although both are known to be associated with serious side effects, including hepatic veno-occlusive disease, and neurotoxicity. The administration of anticonvulsant prophylaxis has become more common during high-dose Bu-based conditioning regimen; however, anticonvulsants can interfere with Bu pharmacokinetics and may have their own side effects, which can affect the outcome of the transplant. Our objective was to analyze the incidence of neurotoxicity in patients who underwent stem cell transplantation with high-dose Bu-based conditioning regimens without anticonvulsant prophylaxis. Ninety-seven patients were included, either having received a dose of 12 mg/kg (n = 73) for allogeneic transplantation or 16 mg/kg (n = 24) for autologous transplantation. The incidence of seizures was 0.01 %. We conclude that anticonvulsant prophylactic regimens may be unnecessary, and reduction of their use may help to avoid potential drug interactions and undesired side effects.

Oral versus intravenous fludarabine as part of a reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In 2003, oral fludarabine was introduced in the USA for the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies as an alternative to its intravenous (i.v.) formulation; in 2008, it was introduced in México while the i.v. formulation was withdrawn. Accordingly, i.v. fludarabine had to be replaced by oral fludarabine as part of the conditioning regimen employed to conduct allogeneic stem cell transplantation in México. METHODS: Nonrandomized retrospective analysis of 55 patients conditioned with oral fludarabine compared with 113 patients conditioned with the i.v. formulation. In addition to fludarabine, the conditioning regimen included oral busulfan and i.v. cyclophosphamide. Donors were HLA-matched siblings. RESULTS: The clinical features of the two groups were comparable. There were no statistical differences in time to neutrophil engraftment, time to platelet engraftment, acute graft versus host disease rate and nonrelapse mortality at day 100. The overall survival of patients allografted with oral fludarabine was better than those allografted with i.v. fludarabine: 62 and 33% at 67 months, respectively (p = 0.0006). DISCUSSION: Oral fludarabine can replace its i.v. formulation as part of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens with no deleterious effect on any of the early transplantation outcomes.

Influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan during pretransplant conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

This study evaluated the influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan administered orally to patients receiving a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-six patients treated with oral busulfan (1 mg/kg/6 h for 4 days) were divided into two groups according to the concomitant administration of fludarabine (n = 11; 30 mg/m(2) for 5 days) or subsequent administration of cyclophosphamide (n = 15; 60 mg/kg for 2 days). Serial blood samples were collected on Day 4 of busulfan administration. Plasma busulfan concentrations were determined by HPLC-UV and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the WinNonlin program. Patients concomitantly treated with fludarabine showed reduced apparent clearance of busulfan (110.5 mL/h/kg vs. 157.4 mL/h/kg) and higher AUC0-6 (area under the plasma concentrations vs. time curve) than patients subsequently treated with cyclophosphamide (7.9 µg h/mL vs. 5.7 µg h/mL). No association was observed between busulfan AUC0-6 and clinical evolution of the patients. Although plasma busulfan concentrations were higher in patients receiving concomitant fludarabine, myelosuppression-related toxicity was less frequent than in patients treated with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The results suggest that patients treated with fludarabine should receive 30% lower busulfan doses during conditioning protocols for HSCT.

Factors affecting hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization: an analysis of 307 patients.

We reviewed the data of 307 patients treated with autologous bone marrow transplantation with the aim to identify factors associated with poor hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization after administration of cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Success in mobilization was defined when > or = 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg weight could be collected with < or = 3 leukapheresis procedures. Success was observed in 260 patients (84.7%) and nonsuccess in 47 patients (15.3%). According to the stepwise regression model: diagnosis, chemotherapy load, treatment with mitoxantrone and platelet count before mobilization were found to be independent predictive factors for HSC mobilization. These results could help in the previous recognition of patients at risk for non response to mobilization and allow to plan an alternative protocol for this group of patients.

HLA-matched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation in 43 patients with Fanconi anemia conditioned with 60 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide.

Cells from Fanconi anemia (FA) patients are hypersensitive to alkylating agents and radiation traditionally used as conditioning regimens for marrow cell transplantation, and patients experience serious toxicities. To reduce toxicities, we used progressively lower doses of cyclophosphamide (CY) for conditioning. Here, we report the results in 43 FA patients who received marrow transplantation from HLA-matched related donors (37 siblings and 6 other relatives). Conditioning consisted of 15 mg CY/kg/day for 4 days along with Mesna. Methotrexate and cyclosporine were given for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Forty patients (93%) are alive with a median follow-up of 3.7 (range 0.6 to 7.9) years. One patient with primary graft failure was successfully retransplanted. Three of 4 patients with late graft failures were retransplanted, and 2 of those are alive; 1 died before a second marrow graft. Twelve patients including 3 with rejection had cytogenetic abnormalities in their marrow cells before transplantation. Acute grade II-III and chronic GVHD (aGVHD, cGVHD) were seen in 17% and 28.5% of patients, respectively. These results confirm and extend our previous observations that conditioning with 60 mg CY/kg allows for sustained engraftment of HLA-matched related marrow grafts in most FA patients and is associated with low toxicity, low incidences of aGVHD and cGVHD, and excellent long-term survival.

Allografting in patients with severe, refractory aplastic anemia using peripheral blood stem cells and a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen: the Mexican experience.

We studied the effectiveness of a fludarabine/cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimen without anti-thymocyte globulin in 23 aplastic anemia patients who had no response to previous conventional pharmacologic treatment. Patients received oral busulphan 4 mg/kg/day/2 days, IV cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m(2)/day/3 days, and fludarabine 30 mg/m(2)/day/3 days. For GVHD prophylaxis, patients received MTX 5 mg/m(2) days +1, +3, +6, and +11 and oral cyclosporin A (CyA) 5 mg/kg/day, starting on day -1. Peripheral blood stem cell products were used with a median dose of 5.5 x 10(6) CD34(+)/kg. The patients were followed for an average of 25 months. By a median of day +11, an ANC > 0.5 x 10(9)/L was reached; and by day +12, the platelet count had reached >20,000 x 10(9)/L. Acute grade I-II GVHD occurred in 4 patients, whereas limited chronic GVHD presented in 6 cases. Twenty-one patients (91.3%) achieved engraftment. Two patients failed to engraft, and 4 developed late rejection; 2 of these individuals died, 2 have survived with high transfusion requirements, whereas 2 received a second peripheral blood stem cell infusion and achieved sustained engraftment. Currently 21 (91%) of the 23 patients are alive, whereas 19 of 21 (90%) remain in complete remission. The average cost was about USD 15,000 for this kind of reduced-intensity allotransplant. Reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation represents an affordable alternative to traditional more cytotoxic conditioning for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. Long-term effects however, remain to be evaluated.