Case report: tumefactive demyelinating lesions after the second cycle of alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis; immune cell profile and biomarkers.

Objective: We present a case of multiple tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs) emerging 24 months after the second cycle of alemtuzumab treatment. Methods: A woman with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) discontinued fingolimod treatment due to gestational desire, which resulted in a severe disease exacerbation. Alemtuzumab was initiated, accompanied by regular clinical, radiological, and immunological monitoring. Results: She relapsed prior to the second cycle, exhibiting 12 T1Gd+ lesions, and peripheral blood showed an increase in B-cells and a decrease in T-cells. At 24 months following the second cycle, she developed cognitive impairment and multiple T1Gd+ lesions, including TDLs, were evident on the brain MRI. We found not only an increase in B-cells but also in Th1 central memory cells. Th1/Th17 cells increased 3 months before the detection of TDLs. Conclusions: TDLs can appear 24 months after the second cycle of alemtuzumab treatment in MS. The increase in Th1/Th17 cells could be a candidate biomarker for TDLs in alemtuzumab-treated MS patients.

Alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis in Austria: An observational long-term outcome study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Observational real-world study to analyze the clinical effects of alemtuzumab (ALEM) and subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT) usage in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Data retrieved from the Austrian MS treatment registry (AMSTR) included baseline (BL) characteristics (at ALEM start), annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA; ≥ 0.5-point Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; ≥ 0.5-point EDSS decrease), and safety outcomes until initiation of a subsequent DMT. The EDSS was re-baselined at 30 days from ALEM start (BL EDSS). RESULTS: Eighty-seven ALEM-treated patients (median age: 32 years, 72% female, 14% treatment-naïve) were followed for a median of 55 (interquartile range 31-68) months. We found significant reductions in the ARR from 1.16 before ALEM to 0.15 throughout Years 1-9 (p < 0.001). Subsequent DMTs were initiated in 19 patients (22%, 74% anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). At Year 5 (n = 53), more patients achieved CDI (58%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 45%-71%) than had experienced PIRA (14%, CI 7.5%-24%), and 58% remained relapse-free. Shorter MS duration (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (CI 0.80-0.93)) and no previous high-efficacy treatment (p < 0.001, HR 5.16 (CI 2.66-10.0)) were the best predictors of CDI, while PIRA was associated with a higher number of previous DMTs (p = 0.04, HR 3.06, CI 1.05-8.89). We found no new safety signals. INTERPRETATION: ALEM had long-lasting beneficial effects on the ARR and disability improvement, especially when initiated early in the course of the disease. Only a subset of patients received subsequent DMTs.

Azathioprine/hydroxyurea preconditioning prior to nonmyeloablative matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults with sickle cell disease: A prospective observational cohort study.

Nonmyeloablative, matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with alemtuzumab/total body irradiation (TBI) conditioning is a curative therapy with low toxicity for adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, relatively low donor chimerism levels and graft rejection remain important challenges. We hypothesized that adding azathioprine/hydroxyurea preconditioning will improve donor chimerism levels and reduce graft failure rate. In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive adult patients with SCD undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation at the Amsterdam UMC. Patients received azathioprine 150 mg/day and hydroxyurea 25 mg/kg/day for 3 months prior to alemtuzumab 1 mg/kg and 300 cGy TBI conditioning. Twenty patients with SCD (median age 26 years [range 19-49], 13 females) were transplanted. Median follow-up was 46.0 months (IQR 21.8-57.9). One-year overall survival and event-free survival (graft failure or death) were both 95% (95% confidence interval 86-100). Mean donor myeloid and T-cell chimerism 1-year post-transplant were 95.2% (SD ±10.6) and 67.3% (±15.3), respectively. One patient (5%) experienced graft failure without autologous regeneration, resulting in infections and death. All other patients had a corrected SCD phenotype and were able to discontinue sirolimus. Three patients were successfully treated with alemtuzumab (1 mg/kg) after the transplant because of declining donor chimerism and cytopenias to revert impending graft rejection. Toxicity was mostly related to sirolimus and alemtuzumab. One patient developed steroid-responsive grade II intestinal acute graft-versus-host disease. Collectively, preconditioning with azathioprine/hydroxyurea prior to nonmyeloablative matched sibling donor transplantation resulted in excellent event-free survival and robust donor T-cell chimerism, enabling the successful withdrawal of sirolimus. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05249452.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell Transplantation Using Alemtuzumab in Asian Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity.

Alemtuzumab is used with reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), demonstrating efficacy and feasibility for patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) in Western countries; however, the clinical experience in Asian patients with IEI is limited. We retrospectively analyzed patients with IEI who underwent the first allogeneic HCT with alemtuzumab combined with RTC regimens in Japan. A total of 19 patients were included and followed up for a median of 18 months. The donors were haploidentical parents (n = 10), matched siblings (n = 2), and unrelated bone marrow donors (n = 7). Most patients received RTC regimens containing fludarabine and busulfan and were treated with 0.8 mg/kg alemtuzumab with intermediate timing. Eighteen patients survived and achieved stable engraftment, and no grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease was observed. Viral infections were observed in 11 patients (58%) and 6 of them presented symptomatic. The median CD4+ T cell count was low at 6 months (241/µL) but improved at 1 year (577/µL) after HCT. Whole blood cells continued to exhibit > 80% donor type in most cases; however, 3/10 patients exhibited poor donor chimerism only among T cells and also showed undetectable levels of T-cell receptor recombination excision circles (TRECs) at 1 year post-HCT. This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab; however, patients frequently developed viral infections and slow reconstitution or low donor chimerism in T cells, emphasizing the importance of monitoring viral status and T-cell-specific chimerism. (238 < 250 words).

Alemtuzumab induction is associated with decreased hospitalization rates in pediatric kidney transplant: A UNOS data review for safety and outcomes with common induction regimens.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that alemtuzumab use is safe in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with equivalent long-term outcomes compared to other induction agents. METHODS: Using pediatric kidney transplant recipient data in the UNOS database between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2022, multivariate logistic regression, multivariable Cox regression, and survival analyses were utilized to estimate the likelihoods of 1st-year and all-time hospitalizations, acute rejection, CMV infection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, and patient mortality among recipients of three common induction regimens (ATG, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab). RESULTS: There were no differences in acute rejection or graft failure among induction or maintenance regimens. Basiliximab was associated with lower odds of DGF in deceased donor recipients (OR 0.77 [0.60-0.99], p = .04). Mortality was increased in patients treated with steroid-containing maintenance (HR 1.3 [1.005-1.7] p = .045). Alemtuzumab induction correlated with less risk of CMV infection than ATG (OR 0.76 [0.59-0.99], p = .039). Steroid-containing maintenance conferred lower rate of PTLD compared to steroid-free maintenance (HR 0.59 [0.4-0.8] p = .001). Alemtuzumab was associated with less risk of hospitalization within 1 year (OR 0.79 [0.67-0.95] p = .012) and 5 years (HR 0.54 [0.46-0.65] p < .001) of transplantation. Steroid maintenance also decreased 5 years hospitalization risk (HR 0.78 [0.69-0.89] p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric KTRs may be safely treated with alemtuzumab induction without increased risk of acute rejection, DGF, graft loss, or patient mortality. The decreased risk of CMV infections and lower hospitalization rates compared to other agents make alemtuzumab an attractive choice for induction in pediatric KTRs, especially in those who cannot tolerate ATG.

Risk of secondary autoimmune diseases with alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the risk of secondary autoimmune diseases in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with alemtuzumab (ALZ) through a meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched. Information and data were screened and extracted by 2 researchers. The obtained data were analyzed using the R software meta package. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The causes of heterogeneity were analyzed using subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. Results: The search retrieved a total of 3530 papers from the databases. After screening, a total of 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis results indicate that the pooled incidence rate of overall secondary autoimmune events (SAEs) in the included studies was 0.2824 [0.2348, 0.3300] (I²=94%, p<0.01). The overall incidence of autoimmune thyroid events (ATE) was 0.2257 [0.1810, 0.2703] (I²=94%, p<0.01). Among them, the rate of serious autoimmune thyroid events (SATE) was 0.0541 [0.0396, 0.0687] (I²=0%, p=0.44). The incidence rates of different thyroid events were as follows: Graves' disease (GD), 0.2266 [0.1632, 0.2900] (I²=83%, p<0.01); Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT), 0.0844 [0.0000, 0.2262] (I²=81%, p=0.02); Hashimoto thyroiditis with hypothyroidism (HTwH), 0.0499 [0.0058, 0.0940] (I²=37%, p=0.21); fluctuating thyroid dysfunction (FTD), 0.0219 [0.0015, 0.0424] (I²=0%, p=0.40); transient thyroiditis (TT), 0.0178 [0.0062, 0.0295] (I²=0%, p=0.94). The overall incidence of hematological events was 0.0431 [0.0274, 0.0621] (I²=70%, p<0.01). The incidence rates from high to low were as follows: lymphopenia, 0.0367 [0.0000, 0.0776] (I²=81%, p=0.02); Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), 0.0258 [0.0199, 0.0323] (I²=25%, p=0.15); Hemolytic anemia (HA), 0.0177 [0.0081, 0.0391] (I²=29%, p=0.23); pancytopenia, 0.0136 [0.0000, 0.0314] (I²=0%, p=0.67); Neutropenia, 0.0081 [0.0000, 0.0183] (I²=0%, p=0.42). After excluding thyroid and hematological diseases, the combined incidence of other related SAEs was 0.0061 [0.0014, 0.0109] (I²=50%, p=0.02). The incidence of each disease ranked from highest to lowest as: skin psoriasis (SP), 0.0430 [0.0000, 0.0929] (I²=0%, p=0.57); alopecia areata (AA), 0.0159 [0.0024, 0.0372] (I²=19%, p=0.29); vitiligo, 0.0134 [0.0044, 0.0223] (I²=0%, p=0.81); inflammatory atrichia (IA), 0.0103 [0.0000, 0.0232] (I²=0%, p=0.43); chronic urticaria (CU), 0.0107 [0.0000, 0.0233] (I²=0%, p=0.60); and nephropathy, 0.0051 [0.0000, 0.0263] (I²=62%, p=0.02). Conclusion: The occurrence of secondary autoimmune diseases in patients with MS treated with ALZ is noteworthy, particularly in the form of thyroid events and hematological events. Clinicians should monitor the overall condition of patients promptly for early management and avoid delayed diagnosis and treatment. Systematic review registration: inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-4-0048/, identifier INPLASY202440048.

Long-term outcomes of two-dose alemtuzumab induction in pediatric kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab is a lymphocyte depleting agent used for induction in kidney transplant, but long-term information on its use in pediatric recipients remains sparse. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 57 pediatric kidney transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab 20 mg/m2/dose ×2 doses for induction immunosuppression. All patients underwent surveillance biopsies, and 91.3% underwent steroid withdrawal by day 4 post-transplant. Outcomes of interest included graft survival, development of donor specific antibodies (DSA), incidence of viremia and PTLD, and duration of lymphopenia. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 7.9 years (IQR 5-13.6 years). Median graft survival was 16.5 years (95% CI 11.6-unknown). DSA developed in 36.5% at a median of 944 days (IQR 252-2113 days). Incidences of BK polyomavirus DNAemia (BKPyV-DNAemia), CMV DNAemia, and EBV DNAemia were 38.6%, 22.8%, and 14%, respectively; one patient developed PTLD at 13.3 years post-transplant. Median duration of lymphopenia was 365 days (IQR 168-713 days); 19.3% of patients remained lymphopenic at 3 years post-transplant. There was no association between duration of lymphopenia and graft survival, rejection, DSA detection, or viremia. CONCLUSIONS: A two-dose alemtuzumab induction protocol can have excellent outcomes with a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression regimen. More comprehensive, multicenter, comparative studies of pediatric kidney transplant are needed to improve long-term outcomes.

Early recovery of natural killer cells post T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation using alemtuzumab "in the bag".

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a critical therapy for haematological malignancy but may lead to acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab, either in vivo or ex vivo, reduces the incidence of GvHD but is a risk factor for disease relapse and poor immune reconstitution. Natural killer (NK) cells are the first lymphocytes to recover. Classical NK cells make up >90% of the normal circulating population and can directly kill neoplastic or virally infected cells while the regulatory subset makes up <10%, secretes cytokines and is not cytotoxic. The recovery and balance of these subsets post SCT remains controversial, with most studies analysing patients who received unmanipulated grafts and in vivo immunosuppression. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the early recovery of NK cells in 18 consecutive patients receiving ex vivo T-cell depleted SCT and to compare the results to 25 individuals receiving haploidentical non-T cell depleted grafts. METHODS: All patients received myeloablative conditioning. After stem cell collection, the stem cells of the T cell depleted group were treated "in the bag" with alemtuzumab (CAMPATH 1H) at a concentration of 1mg/108 mononuclear cells and thereafter immediately infused. For those receiving non-T cell depleted grafts, GvHD prophylaxis was with post infusion therapeutic doses of cyclophosphamide. Blood samples were collected at days 21, 28 and 90. Complete blood counts were performed on an automated analyser while lymphocyte and NK subsets were examined using multiparameter flowcytometry. NK cells were defined as lymphocytes which were CD3-/CD56+. The classical subset was recognised as CD56dim/CD16+ while the regulatory population as CD56bright/CD16-. The results for both transplant types were compared at all time points using SPSS v8 statistical software. RESULTS: The recovery of lymphocytes was slow in both groups. Those receiving non-T cell depleted grafts had significantly higher T cell counts at day 21 and 28 when compared to the T cell depleted group (P < 0.05). In contrast, NK cells in the ex vivo T-cell depleted patients recovered rapidly and by day 21 was no different to normal (p > 0.05), while the non-T cell depleted group had significantly decreased numbers (p < 0.001), only recovering at day 90. Both groups had abnormal NK cell subset ratios with significantly elevated percentages of regulatory cells (p < 0.05). However, significant differences were observed between the two groups with those receiving T cell depleted grafts having lower percentages of regulatory cells as well as higher numbers of classical NK cells at day 21 and 28 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study of ex vivo T-cell depleted SCT's demonstrates that NK cells recover quicker when compared to those receiving unfractionated grafts. These results may have implications for GvHD and the GvL effect which warrants further study.

The Effect of Induction Therapy on Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis Using Recent Data.

BACKGROUND: Various induction regimens are available for kidney transplantation (KT); however, which is superior remains unclear. Moreover, although the induction regimens are effective and important for reducing side effects, their respective relationships with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after transplantation remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the most effective induction regimen for AMR reduction through network analysis. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of databases, including basiliximab, alemtuzumab, antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and daclizumab as induction regimens for KT from inception to September 1, 2022. Using a network meta-analysis, we investigated the priorities of 5 induction regimens for patient survival, graft failure, and graft rejection after ABO-incompatible KT. RESULTS: In total, 25 studies comprising 1768 people were included in this network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the AMR rate of other induction regimens compared with that of basiliximab, whereas the secondary outcomes were heart failure, stroke, hospitalization, peripheral artery disease, myocardial infarction, anemia, leukopenia, herpes zoster, or adverse events. Notably, ATG reduced the AMR rate by 59% (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% credible interval, 0.20-0.90), whereas the other drugs did not show statistical significance. Furthermore, secondary outcomes did not significantly differ between the induction regimens. CONCLUSION: ATG is widely used in KT induction regimens. Our results showed that ATG reduced the risk of AMR in KT recipients when compared with other induction drugs; therefore, it appears to be an efficient choice of induction regimen to reduce AMR after KT.

Alemtuzumab-induced thyroid eye disease successfully treated with a single low dose of rituximab.

Introduction: Secondary thyroid autoimmunity, especially Graves' disease (GD), frequently develops in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) following alemtuzumab treatment (ALTZ; anti-CD52). Thyroid eye disease (TED) can also develop, and rituximab (RTX; anti-CD20) is a suitable treatment. Case presentation: A 37-year-old woman with MS developed steroid-resistant active moderate-to-severe TED 3 years after ALTZ, that successfully responded to a single 500 mg dose of i.v. RTX. Before RTX peripheral B-cells were low, and were totally depleted immediately after therapy. Follow-up analysis 4 years post ALTZ and 1 year post RTX showed persistent depletion of B cells, and reduction of T regulatory cells in both peripheral blood and thyroid tissue obtained at thyroidectomy. Conclusion: RTX therapy successfully inactivated TED in a patient with low B-cell count derived from previous ALTZ treatment. B-cell depletion in both thyroid and peripheral blood was still present 1 year after RTX, indicating a likely cumulative effect of both treatments.

Distinct disease-modifying therapies are associated with different blood immune cell profiles in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) used for treating people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS) target the immune system by different mechanisms of action. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive assessment of their effects on the immune system in comparison to treatment-naïve pwRRMS. Herein, we evaluated the numbers of circulating B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), natural killer (NK) cells and NKT cells, and their subsets, in pwRRMS who were treatment-naïve or treated with different DMTs. Compared to treatment-naïve pwRRMS, common and divergent effects on immune system cells were observed on pwRRMS treated with different DMTs, with no consistent pattern across all therapies in any of the cell populations analysed. PwRRMS treated with fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), or alemtuzumab have reduced numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as Treg subsets, with fingolimod causing the most pronounced decrease in T cell subsets. In contrast, teriflunomide and interferon (IFN) ß have minimal impact on T cells, and natalizumab marginally increases the number of memory T cells in the blood. The effect of DMTs on the B cell, NKT and NK cell subsets is highly variable with alemtuzumab inducing a strong increase in the number of the most immature NK cells and its subsets. This study comprehensively evaluates the magnitude of the effect of different DMTs on blood immune cells providing a better understanding of therapy outcome. Furthermore, the lack of a discernible pattern in the effects of DMTs on blood immune cells suggests that multiple immune cells can independently modulate the disease.

Substantial and comparable suppression of disease activity following early initiation of cladribine tablets, ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab as first pharmacologic treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis: A real world study.

BACKGROUND: We describe the efficacy and safety of recent high efficacy disease DMTs in DMT-naive patients with highly active RMS. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross sectional study from the Kuwait national MS registry. Patients with RMS who received alemtuzumab, cladribine tablets or ocrelizumab as their first DMT for RMS, with ≥2 year of follow up were included. The primary endpoint was the change in relapse rate from treatment initiation to 1 year; changes in disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]), radiologic activity, the proportion with no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3), and the frequency of adverse events were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Among 123 RRMS patients, 59 received ocrelizumab, 32 received cladribine tablets and 32 received alemtuzumab. About two-thirds (65%) were women. Substantial and similar (p>0.05) reductions occurred at the end of follow-up in annual relapse rate (by 93.2% for ocrelizumab, 87.5% for cladribine tablets, and 90.6% for alemtuzumab). The proportion with new T2 of gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesions across the three groups was reduced from 85-100% to 7-13%. Rates of confirmed disability progression were low (ocrelizumab 6.9%, cladribine tablets 3.1%, alemtuzumab 0%; p=0.280); disability was reduced in 15%, 22% and 38%, respectively. NEDA-3 was observed in 89.8%, 87.5%, and 84.4, respectively (p=0.784). No new or unexpected safety issues occurred. CONCLUSION: Ocrelizumab, cladribine tablets and alemtuzumab reduced relapse rates and MRI activity, and prevented disease progression, when are initiated early in DMT-naive RMS patients. These data support the early use of high-efficacy DMTs for people with highly active RMS.

Real-World Retrospective Analysis of Alemtuzumab Outcomes in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The LEMCAM Study.

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab is a high-efficacy treatment approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Although clinical trials and observational studies are consistent in showing its efficacy and manageable safety profile, further studies under clinical practice conditions are needed to further support its clinical use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this observational retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab to add to the current real-world evidence on the drug. METHODS: A cohort of 115 adult patients with RRMS treated with alemtuzumab between 2014 and 2020 was retrospectively followed up in five centers in Spain. Analysis included annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability worsening (CDW), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI), radiological activity, no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3), and safety signals. Given the different follow-up periods among participants, ARR was calculated using the person-years method. CDI was defined as a ≥ 1.0-point decrease in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score assessed in patients with a baseline EDSS score ≥ 2.0 confirmed 6 months apart. CDW was defined as a ≥ 1.0-point increase in EDSS score assessed in patients with a baseline EDSS score ≥ 1.0 (≥ 1.5 if baseline EDSS = 0), confirmed 6 months apart. RESULTS: ARR decreased from 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.60-2.33) in the year prior to alemtuzumab initiation to 0.28 (0.17-0.37) after 1 year of treatment (87% reduction), and to 0.22 (0.13-0.35) after the second year. Over the entire follow-up period, ARR was 0.24 (0.18-0.30). At year 1, 75% of patients showed no signs of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and 70% at year 5. One percent of patients experienced 6-month CDW at year 1, 2.6% at year 2, 7.4% at year 3, and no patients over years 4 and 5. A total of 7.7% of patients achieved 6-month CDI in year 1, 3.6% in year 2, and maintained it at years 3 and 4. Most patients achieved annual NEDA-3: year 1, 72%; year 2, 79%; year 3, 80%; year 4, 89%; year 5, 75%. Infusion-related reactions were observed in 95% of patients and infections in 74%. Thyroid disorders occurred in 30% of patients, and only three patients developed immune thrombocytopenia. No cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that alemtuzumab reduced the relapse rate and disability worsening in real-world clinical practice, with many patients achieving and sustaining NEDA-3 over time. The safety profile of alemtuzumab was consistent with previous findings, and no new or unexpected safety signals were observed. As this was an observational and retrospective study, the main limitation of not having all variables comprehensively available for all patients should be considered when interpreting results.

[Durable remission of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia with CLEC16A::IL2 after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

A 64-year-old woman presented with fine motor impairment in both hands. MRI revealed a contrast-enhanced lesion in the medulla oblongata. Lymphoid cells with abnormal blebs were observed and a CD4+/CD8+ double positive (DP) T cell population was detected by flow cytometry (FCM) in the bone marrow (BM) and the peripheral blood (PB). CLEC16A::IL2 fusion gene was identified by whole exome sequencing with DNA prepared from DP T cells. Clonal rearrangement of the T-cell receptor gene and expression of TCL1A protein were detected. This led to a diagnosis of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) with central nervous system (CNS) infiltration. Abnormal cells in BM and PB became undetectable on microscopy and FCM, and the CNS lesion disappeared on MRI after second-line therapy with alemtuzumab. Meanwhile, the CLEC16A::IL2 fusion mRNA remained detectable in PB. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation was performed, and the fusion mRNA has now been undetectable for more than 5 years since transplantation. This is the first report of a T-PLL case with a CLEC16A::IL2 fusion gene.

Efficacy and safety of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab or cladribine in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (StarMS): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is increasingly used as treatment for patients with active multiple sclerosis (MS), typically after failure of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). A recent phase III trial, 'Multiple Sclerosis International Stem Cell Transplant, MIST', showed that aHSCT resulted in prolonged time to disability progression compared with DMTs in patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). However, the MIST trial did not include many of the current high-efficacy DMTs (alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab or cladribine) in use in the UK within the control arm, which are now offered to patients with rapidly evolving severe MS (RES-MS) who are treatment naïve. There remain, therefore, unanswered questions about the relative efficacy and safety of aHSCT over these high-efficacy DMTs in these patient groups. The StarMS trial (Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Alemtuzumab, Ocrelizumab, Ofatumumab or Cladribine in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis) will assess the efficacy, safety and long-term impact of aHSCT compared with high-efficacy DMTs in patients with highly active RRMS despite the use of standard DMTs or in patients with treatment naïve RES-MS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: StarMS is a multicentre parallel-group rater-blinded randomised controlled trial with two arms. A total of 198 participants will be recruited from 19 regional neurology secondary care centres in the UK. Participants will be randomly allocated to the aHSCT arm or DMT arm in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will remain in the study for 2 years with follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postrandomisation. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who achieve 'no evidence of disease activity' during the 2-year postrandomisation follow-up period in an intention to treat analysis. Secondary outcomes include efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and immune reconstitution of aHSCT and the four high-efficacy DMTs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Yorkshire and Humber-Leeds West Research Ethics Committee (20/YH/0061). Participants will provide written informed consent prior to any study specific procedures. The study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and abstracts will be submitted to relevant national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN88667898.

Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Different therapeutic strategies are available for the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), including immunomodulators, immunosuppressants and biological agents. Although each one of these therapies reduces relapse frequency and slows disability accumulation compared to no treatment, their relative benefit remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review published in 2015. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety, through network meta-analysis, of interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab, pegylated interferon beta-1a, daclizumab, laquinimod, azathioprine, immunoglobulins, cladribine, cyclophosphamide, diroximel fumarate, fludarabine, interferon beta 1-a and beta 1-b, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline, mycophenolate mofetil, ofatumumab, ozanimod, ponesimod, rituximab, siponimod and steroids for the treatment of people with RRMS. SEARCH METHODS: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers were searched on 21 September 2021 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. A top-up search was conducted on 8 August 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied one or more of the available immunomodulators and immunosuppressants as monotherapy in comparison to placebo or to another active agent, in adults with RRMS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We considered both direct and indirect evidence and performed data synthesis by pairwise and network meta-analysis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 50 studies involving 36,541 participants (68.6% female and 31.4% male). Median treatment duration was 24 months, and 25 (50%) studies were placebo-controlled. Considering the risk of bias, the most frequent concern was related to the role of the sponsor in the authorship of the study report or in data management and analysis, for which we judged 68% of the studies were at high risk of other bias. The other frequent concerns were performance bias (34% judged as having high risk) and attrition bias (32% judged as having high risk). Placebo was used as the common comparator for network analysis. Relapses over 12 months: data were provided in 18 studies (9310 participants). Natalizumab results in a large reduction of people with relapses at 12 months (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.63; high-certainty evidence). Fingolimod (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.57; moderate-certainty evidence), daclizumab (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; moderate-certainty evidence), and immunoglobulins (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.79; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a large reduction of people with relapses at 12 months. Relapses over 24 months: data were reported in 28 studies (19,869 participants). Cladribine (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.64; high-certainty evidence), alemtuzumab (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.68; high-certainty evidence) and natalizumab (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.65; high-certainty evidence) result in a large decrease of people with relapses at 24 months. Fingolimod (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.60; moderate-certainty evidence), dimethyl fumarate (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.70; moderate-certainty evidence), and ponesimod (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.70; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a large decrease of people with relapses at 24 months. Glatiramer acetate (RR 0.84, 95%, CI 0.76 to 0.93; moderate-certainty evidence) and interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif) (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91; moderate-certainty evidence) probably moderately decrease people with relapses at 24 months. Relapses over 36 months findings were available from five studies (3087 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate- or high-certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 24 months was assessed in 31 studies (24,303 participants). Natalizumab probably results in a large reduction of disability worsening (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.75; moderate-certainty evidence) at 24 months. Disability worsening over 36 months was assessed in three studies (2684 participants) but none of the studies used placebo as the comparator. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events data were available from 43 studies (35,410 participants). Alemtuzumab probably results in a slight reduction of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.79; moderate-certainty evidence). Daclizumab (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.63; moderate-certainty evidence), fingolimod (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.57; moderate-certainty evidence), teriflunomide (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.79; moderate-certainty evidence), interferon beta-1a (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.20; moderate-certainty evidence), laquinimod (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.00 to 2.15; moderate-certainty evidence), natalizumab (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.05), and glatiramer acetate (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.14; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a slight increase in the number of people who discontinue treatment due to adverse events. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 35 studies (33,998 participants). There was probably a trivial reduction in SAEs amongst people with RRMS treated with interferon beta-1b as compared to placebo (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.54; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are highly confident that, compared to placebo, two-year treatment with natalizumab, cladribine, or alemtuzumab decreases relapses more than with other DMTs. We are moderately confident that a two-year treatment with natalizumab may slow disability progression. Compared to those on placebo, people with RRMS treated with most of the assessed DMTs showed a higher frequency of treatment discontinuation due to AEs: we are moderately confident that this could happen with fingolimod, teriflunomide, interferon beta-1a, laquinimod, natalizumab and daclizumab, while our certainty with other DMTs is lower. We are also moderately certain that treatment with alemtuzumab is associated with fewer discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, and moderately certain that interferon beta-1b probably results in a slight reduction in people who experience serious adverse events, but our certainty with regard to other DMTs is lower. Insufficient evidence is available to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMTs in a longer term than two years, and this is a relevant issue for a chronic condition like MS that develops over decades. More than half of the included studies were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies and this may have influenced their results. Further studies should focus on direct comparison between active agents, with follow-up of at least three years, and assess other patient-relevant outcomes, such as quality of life and cognitive status, with particular focus on the impact of sex/gender on treatment effects.

Adverse Events Associated With Disease-Modifying Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis: A Multiregional Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is not possible to fully establish the safety of a disease-modifying drug (DMD) for multiple sclerosis (MS) from randomized controlled trials as only very common adverse events occurring over the short-term can be captured, and the quality of reporting has been variable. We examined the relationship between the DMDs for MS and potential adverse events in a multiregion population-based study. METHODS: We identified people with MS using linked administrative health data from 4 Canadian provinces. MS cases were followed from the most recent of first MS or related demyelinating disease event on January 1, 1996, until the earliest of emigration, death, or December 31, 2017. DMD exposure primarily comprised ß-interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, and alemtuzumab. We examined associations between DMD exposure and infection-related hospitalizations and physician visits using recurrent events proportional means models and between DMD exposure and 15 broad categories of incident adverse events using stratified multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: We identified 35,894 people with MS. While virtually all DMDs were associated with a 42%-61% lower risk of infection-related hospitalizations, there was a modest increase in infection-related physician visits by 10%-33% for select DMDs. For incident adverse events, most elevated risks involved a second-generation DMD, with alemtuzumab's hazard of thyroid disorders being 19.42 (95% CI 9.29-36.51), hypertension 4.96 (95% CI 1.78-13.84), and cardiovascular disease 3.72 (95% CI 2.12-6.53). Natalizumab's highest risk was for cardiovascular disease (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.61; 95% CI 1.24-2.10). For the oral DMDs, fingolimod was associated with higher hazards of cerebrovascular (aHR 2.04; 95% CI 1.27-3.30) and ischemic heart diseases (aHR 1.64; 95% CI 1.10-2.44) and hypertension (aHR 1.73; 95% CI 1.30-2.31); teriflunomide with higher hazards of thyroid disorders (aHR 2.30; 95% CI 1.11-4.74), chronic liver disease (aHR 1.94; 95% CI 1.19-3.18), hypertension (aHR 1.76; 95% CI 1.32-2.37), and hyperlipidemia (aHR 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.44); and from complementary analyses (in 1 province), dimethyl fumarate with acute liver injury (aHR 6.55; 95% CI 1.96-21.87). DISCUSSION: Our study provides an extensive safety profile of several different DMDs used to treat MS in the real-world setting. Our findings not only complement those observed in short-term clinical trials but also provide new insights that help inform the risk-benefit profile of the DMDs used to treat MS in clinical practice. The results of this study highlight the continued need for long-term, independent safety studies of the DMDs used to treat MS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with MS, while DMD exposure reduces the risk of infection-related hospitalizations, there are increased risks of infection-related physician visits and incident adverse events for select DMDs.

Maintenance therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common lymphoproliferative disease in adults and currently remains incurable. As the progression-free period shortens after each successive treatment, strategies such as maintenance therapy are needed to improve the degree and duration of response to previous therapies. Monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, and targeted therapies are among the available options for maintenance therapy. People with CLL who achieve remission after previous therapy may choose to undergo medical observation or maintenance therapy to deepen the response. Even though there is widespread use of therapeutic maintenance agents, the benefits and harms of these treatments are still uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects and safety of maintenance therapy, including anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, immunomodulatory drug therapy, anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and B-cell lymphoma-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for individuals with CLL. SEARCH METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with no language or publication status restrictions. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three trials registers in January 2022 together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs with prospective identification of participants. We excluded cluster-randomised trials, cross-over trial designs, and non-randomised studies. We included studies comparing maintenance therapies with placebo/observation or head-to-head comparisons. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We assessed risk of bias in the included studies using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool for RCTs. We rated the certainty of evidence for the following outcomes using the GRADE approach: overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related mortality (TRM), treatment discontinuation (TD), and all adverse events (AEs). MAIN RESULTS: We identified 11 RCTs (2393 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including seven trials comparing anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (rituximab or ofatumumab) with observation in 1679 participants; three trials comparing immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide) with placebo/observation in 693 participants; and one trial comparing anti-CD 52 mAbs (alemtuzumab) with observation in 21 participants. No comparisons of novel small molecular inhibitors were found. The median age of participants was 54.1 to 71.7 years; 59.5% were males. The type of previous induction treatment, severity of disease, and baseline stage varied among the studies. Five trials included early-stage symptomatic patients, and three trials included advanced-stage patients (Rai stage III/IV or Binet stage B/C). Six trials reported a frequent occurrence of cytogenic aberrations at baseline (69.7% to 80.1%). The median follow-up duration was 12.4 to 73 months. The risk of selection bias in the included studies was unclear. We assessed overall risk of performance bias and detection bias as low risk for objective outcomes and high risk for subjective outcomes. Overall risk of attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias was low. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): rituximab or ofatumumab maintenance versus observation Anti-CD20 mAbs maintenance likely results in little to no difference in OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.20; 1152 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increases PFS significantly (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.73; 1255 participants; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to observation alone. Anti-CD20 mAbs may result in: an increase in grade 3/4 AEs (rate ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.71; 1284 participants; 5 studies; low-certainty evidence); little to no difference in TRM (risk ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.71; 1189 participants; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence); a slight reduction to no difference in TD (risk ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.20; 1321 participants; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence); and an increase in all AEs (rate ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.47; 1321 participants; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence) compared to the observation group. One RCT reported that there may be no difference in HRQoL between the anti-CD20 mAbs (ofatumumab) maintenance and the observation group (mean difference -1.70, 95% CI -8.59 to 5.19; 480 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). Immunomodulatory drug (IMiD): lenalidomide maintenance versus placebo/observation IMiD maintenance therapy likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.35; 461 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.73; 461 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/observation. Regarding harms, IMiD maintenance therapy may result in an increase in grade 3/4 AEs (rate ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.38; 400 participants; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) and may result in a slight increase in TRM (risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.29; 458 participants; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/observation. The evidence for the effect on TD compared to placebo is very uncertain (risk ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.05; 400 participants; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). IMiD maintenance therapy probably increases all AEs slightly (rate ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.54; 458 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/observation. No studies assessed HRQoL. Anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): alemtuzumab maintenance versus observation Maintenance with alemtuzumab may have little to no effect on PFS, but the evidence is very uncertain (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.95; 21 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). We did not identify any study reporting the outcomes OS, HRQoL, grade 3/4 AEs, TRM, TD, or all AEs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently moderate- to very low-certainty evidence available regarding the benefits and harms of maintenance therapy in people with CLL. Anti-CD20 mAbs maintenance improved PFS, but also increased grade 3/4 AEs and all AEs. IMiD maintenance had a large effect on PFS, but also increased grade 3/4 AEs. However, none of the above-mentioned maintenance interventions show differences in OS between the maintenance and control groups. The effects of alemtuzumab maintenance are uncertain, coupled with a warning for drug-related infectious toxicity. We found no studies evaluating other novel maintenance interventions, such as B-cell receptor inhibitors, B-cell leukaemia-2/lymphoma-2 inhibitors, or obinutuzumab.

Benefits of aHSCT over alemtuzumab in patients with multiple sclerosis besides disability and relapses: Sustained improvement in cognition and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) exhibits promising results for multiple sclerosis (MS) in the short term. We investigated the long-term outcome differences in disease progression and cognitive impairment after aHSCT and alemtuzumab treatment. METHODS: 20 patients receiving aHSCT and 21 patients treated with alemtuzumab between 2007 and 2020 were included in this monocentric observational cohort study. The primary objective was to compare the outcome of both groups with regards to achieving No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3), defined by the absence of relapses, EDSS progression, and MRI activity. Secondary endpoints in the study included the assessment of neurocognitive functioning, quality of life (QoL), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), and EDSS improvement. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics between both groups were comparable, except for a longer disease duration in the alemtuzumab group of 11.3 years compared to 5.4 years in aHSCT-treated patients (p = 0.002) and a longer mean follow-up time in the aHSCT cohort of 9.0 (range 2.8-15.7) years compared to 5.9 years (range 0.9-9.2) in alemtuzumab patients. NEDA-3 was more frequently observed in the aHSCT group with 75.0 % and 55.0 % at five and 10 years, respectively, than in the alemtuzumab group with only 40.0 % at five years (p = 0.012). Relapse free survival was higher in the aHSCT group (p < 0.001). None of the aHSCT-treated patients showed new T2-lesions six months after therapy initiation until the end of the observational period in contrast to 35.0 % of the alemtuzumab-treated patients showing new T2-lesions (95 %CI 14.2-98.9, p = 0.002). aHSCT-treated patients showed significantly improved cognitive performance in five out of 12 cognitive tests whereas alemtuzumab treated patients deteriorated in four out of 12 tests. Quality of life remained on a constant level for up to 10 years in patients receiving aHSCT with improved scores for the subscale fatigue (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: aHSCT seems to be superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining long-term NEDA-3 status, improving cognition and stabilizing quality of life for up to 10 years.

Neutropenia following immune-depletion, notably CD20 targeting, therapies in multiple sclerosis.

Neutropenia serves as a risk factor for severe infection and is a consequence of some immune-depleting immunotherapies. This occurs in people with multiple sclerosis following chemotherapy-conditioning in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and potent B cell targeting agents. Whilst CD52 is expressed by neutrophils and may contribute to early-onset neutropenia following alemtuzumab treatment, deoxycytidine kinase and CD20 antigen required for activity of cladribine tablets, off-label rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab are not or only weakly expressed by neutrophils. Therefore, alternative explanations are needed for the rare occurrence of early and late-onset neutropenia following such treatments. This probably occurs due to alterations in the balance of granulopoiesis and neutrophil removal. Neutrophils are short-lived, and their removal may be influenced by drug-associated infections, the killing mechanisms of the therapies and amplified by immune dyscrasia due to influences on neutropoiesis following growth factor rerouting for B cell recovery and cytokine deficits following lymphocyte depletion. This highlights the small but evident neutropenia risks following sustained B cell depletion with some treatments.