Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Multimedia | Recursos Multimídia | ID: multimedia-9954

RESUMO

La cocina institucional. Las diferencias de la cocina institucional gastronómica con la cocina de Hospital. Pacientes con un menú fijo versus el cliente ocasional que no tiene una restricción alimenticia


Assuntos
Culinária/classificação , Alimentos Especializados/provisão & distribuição , Hospitais/provisão & distribuição , Alimentação Coletiva
2.
Nutrients ; 14(2)2022 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35057476

RESUMO

The aim of this systematic review of reviews was to synthesise the evidence on factors influencing the implementation, sustainability and scalability of food retail interventions to improve the healthiness of food purchased by consumers. A search strategy to identify reviews published up until June 2020 was applied to four databases. The Risk of Bias in Systematic Review tool was used. Review findings were synthesised narratively using the socio-ecological model. A total of 25 reviews met the inclusion criteria. A number of factors influenced implementation; these included retailers' and consumers' knowledge and preferences regarding healthy food; establishing trust and relationships; perceived consumer demand for healthy food; profitability; store infrastructure; organizational support, including resources; and enabling policies that promote health. Few reviews reported on factors influencing sustainability or scalability of the interventions. While there is a large and rapidly growing body of evidence on factors influencing implementation of interventions, more work is needed to identify factors associated with their sustainability and scalability. These findings can be used to develop implementation strategies that consider the multiple levels of influence (individual, intrapersonal and environmental) to better support implementation of healthy food retail interventions.


Assuntos
Comércio , Dieta Saudável , Abastecimento de Alimentos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Comércio/métodos , Comportamento do Consumidor , Dieta Saudável/métodos , Abastecimento de Alimentos/métodos , Alimentos Especializados/provisão & distribuição , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Supermercados , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto
3.
Nutrients ; 12(7)2020 Jul 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32635525

RESUMO

Food reformulation policies aimed at reducing the risk of diet-related non-communicable diseases have been implemented in many countries. The degree of success of reformulation policies in changing the range of food options available to consumers has been a function of the design of these policies. Our objective was to review the different factors making the design and implementation of a food reformulation policy effective at improving populations' diets and health. In this narrative review, we present a logic model of the action of reformulation policies on consumer behaviour, dietary intake and population health. We set out how policy design could drive outcomes, and highlight the role for governments and public health agencies in promoting food reformulation that is effective in improving diet and health. The key drivers of success for reformulation policies include strong incentives, a tight implementation strategy, a focus on the overall nutritional quality of food products, rather than on individual nutrients, and effective monitoring and evaluation. Additionally, policies should mark the distinction between product reformulation and product differentiation, which have different nutrition and health outcomes.


Assuntos
Dieta Saudável/tendências , Indústria Alimentícia/tendências , Abastecimento de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Alimentos Especializados/provisão & distribuição , Política Nutricional/tendências , Indústria Alimentícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos
4.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0223098, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613889

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has begun a public process to redefine how companies are allowed to use the term "healthy" on food packages. Although the definition is formulated based on the latest consensus in nutrition and epidemiological research, it is also important to understand how consumers define and understand the term if it is to be behaviorally relevant. This research is an exploratory study designed to provide a descriptive account of consumers' perceptions of and beliefs about the meaning of "healthy" food. METHODS: A nationwide U.S. sample of 1,290 food consumers was surveyed in December 2018. Respondents answered 15 questions designed to gauge perceptions of healthy food and to elicit preference for policies surrounding healthy food definitions. Responses are weighted to demographically match the population. Categorical variables have a sampling error of ±2.7%. Exploratory factor analysis is used to determine latent dimensions of health perceptions related to food type. RESULTS: Consumers were about evenly split on whether a food can be deemed healthy based solely on the foods' nutritional content (52.1% believing as such) or whether there were other factors that affect whether a food is healthy (47.9% believing as such). Consumers were also about evenly split on whether an individual food can be considered healthy (believed by 47.9%) or whether this healthiness is instead a characteristic of one's overall diet (believed by 52.1%). Ratings of individual food products revealed that "healthy" perceptions are comprised of at least three underlying latent dimensions related to animal origin, preservation, and freshness/processing. Focusing on individual macronutrients, perceived healthiness was generally decreasing in a food's fat, sodium, and carbohydrate content and increasing in protein content. About 40% of consumers thought a healthy label implied they should increase consumption of the type of food bearing the label and about 15% thought the label meant they could eat all they wanted. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest consumer's perceptions of "healthy," which is primarily based on fat content, partially aligns with the FDA definition but also suggest consumers perceive the word as a broader and more nuanced concept that defies easy, uniform definition. Results highlight areas where nutrition education may be needed and suggest disclosures may need to accompany health claims so that consumers know what, precisely, is being communicated.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor/estatística & dados numéricos , Dieta Saudável/psicologia , Rotulagem de Alimentos/ética , Preferências Alimentares/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Comportamento de Escolha , Carboidratos da Dieta/análise , Gorduras na Dieta/análise , Proteínas Alimentares/análise , Alimentos Especializados/análise , Alimentos Especializados/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Valor Nutritivo , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislação & jurisprudência
5.
Nutrients ; 10(10)2018 Sep 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30257431

RESUMO

Management of coeliac disease (CD) requires the removal of gluten from the diet. Evidence of the availability, cost, and nutritional adequacy of gluten-free (GF) bread and pasta products is limited. GF flours are exempt from UK legislation that requires micronutrient fortification of white wheat flour. This study surveyed the number and cost of bread and pasta products available and evaluated the back-of-pack nutritional information, the ingredient content, and the presence of fortification nutrients of GF bread and pasta, compared to standard gluten-containing equivalent products. Product information was collected from four supermarket websites. Standard products were significantly cheaper, with more products available than GF (p < 0.05). GF bread products were significantly higher in fat and fiber (p < 0.05). All GF products were lower in protein than standard products (p < 0.01). Only 5% of GF breads were fortified with all four mandatory fortification nutrients (calcium, iron, niacin, and thiamin), 28% of GF breads were fortified with calcium and iron only. This lack of fortification may increase the risk of micronutrient deficiency in coeliac sufferers. It is recommended that fortification legislation is extended to include all GF products, in addition to increased regulation of the nutritional content of GF foods.


Assuntos
Pão/análise , Dieta Livre de Glúten/normas , Alimentos Fortificados/análise , Alimentos Especializados/análise , Pão/economia , Pão/provisão & distribuição , Doença Celíaca/dietoterapia , Dieta Livre de Glúten/economia , Grão Comestível , Farinha/análise , Farinha/economia , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Alimentos Fortificados/economia , Alimentos Fortificados/provisão & distribuição , Alimentos Especializados/economia , Alimentos Especializados/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Necessidades Nutricionais , Valor Nutritivo , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...