Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
2.
Altern Lab Anim ; 48(2): 51, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32787661
3.
Reprod Toxicol ; 89: 124-129, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288076

RESUMO

Representatives of applied science (e.g. governmental organizations, academia, and industry) met to discuss the progress towards a harmonized human health risk assessment in developmental toxicology of plant protection products, biocidal products, and other environmental chemicals at the 9th Berlin Workshop on Developmental Toxicity held in September 2018. Within the focus of the scientific discussion were the future of in-vitro methods for developmental and reproductive toxicology, the potential relevance of alternative species in testing of developmental effects, and risk and hazard assessment of developmental and endocrine effects. Furthermore, the need for a harmonized terminology for classification of anomalies in laboratory animals in developmental toxicity studies aiming for human health risk assessment was determined. Here, the DevTox database was identified as an extremely valuable tool. Overall, the participants agreed that still one of the biggest challenges for testing developmental toxicity in the 21st century is the development of animal-free test strategies and alternatives to animal testing that could provide human-relevant information in a rapid, efficient, and mechanistically informative manner.


Assuntos
Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Reprodução/efeitos dos fármacos , Toxicologia/métodos , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Animais , Berlim , Medição de Risco , Especificidade da Espécie , Terminologia como Assunto , Toxicologia/tendências
4.
Toxicol Pathol ; 47(5): 649-655, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31280699

RESUMO

The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on "The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices" (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.


Assuntos
Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/tendências , Primatas , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/ética , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Bem-Estar do Animal , Animais , Bioética , Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/ética , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , União Europeia , Regulamentação Governamental
6.
J Reprod Immunol ; 132: 54-59, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30951977

RESUMO

Research endeavors aiming to understand the maternal immune adaptation to pregnancy significantly rely on the use of animal models, such as mice and rats. These models have provided important insights into the pathophysiology of a number of pregnancy disorders in humans. However, the use of animal models in scientific research is a vividly debated and emotive topic. The 3R principles - replacement, reduction and refinement of research animals - have been propagated a few decades ago. The present review advocates a forward-thinking consciousness to address the 3R principles in research projects in the field of reproductive biology and immunology. Specific measures and alternative methods are being proposed to replace research animals by using e.g. tissue engineering approaches, biobank-derived tissue, 'placenta-on-a-chip' devices or in silico methods. The latter may involve data queries from repositories now available to provide single cell sequencing information on reproductive tissues. Reduction of research animals by gestational imaging and a wealth of suggestions for refinement are proposed. Taken together, the measures and guidelines introduced in this review are expected to spark a reconsideration of experimental designs in the area of reproductive biology and immunology in order to implement 3R principle where applicable.


Assuntos
Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/métodos , Reprodução/imunologia , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Animais , Simulação por Computador , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Camundongos , Modelos Animais
7.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 47: 213-227, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29203341

RESUMO

In vitro chemical safety testing methods offer the potential for efficient and economical tools to provide relevant assessments of human health risk. To realize this potential, methods are needed to relate in vitro effects to in vivo responses, i.e., in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). Currently available IVIVE approaches need to be refined before they can be utilized for regulatory decision-making. To explore the capabilities and limitations of IVIVE within this context, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development and the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods co-organized a workshop and webinar series. Here, we integrate content from the webinars and workshop to discuss activities and resources that would promote inclusion of IVIVE in regulatory decision-making. We discuss properties of models that successfully generate predictions of in vivo doses from effective in vitro concentration, including the experimental systems that provide input parameters for these models, areas of success, and areas for improvement to reduce model uncertainty. Finally, we provide case studies on the uses of IVIVE in safety assessments, which highlight the respective differences, information requirements, and outcomes across various approaches when applied for decision-making.


Assuntos
Segurança Química/métodos , Tomada de Decisões Assistida por Computador , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Prioridades em Saúde , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala , Modelos Biológicos , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Animais , Segurança Química/instrumentação , Segurança Química/legislação & jurisprudência , Segurança Química/tendências , Biologia Computacional , Simulação por Computador , Sistemas Inteligentes , Guias como Assunto , Prioridades em Saúde/tendências , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/tendências , Humanos , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.) , Testes de Toxicidade/instrumentação , Testes de Toxicidade/tendências , Estados Unidos , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services , United States Environmental Protection Agency
8.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 47: 137-146, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29155131

RESUMO

The epithelium that covers the conducting airways and alveoli is a primary target for inhaled toxic substances, and therefore a focus in inhalation toxicology. The increasing concern about the use of animal models has stimulated the development of in vitro cell culture models for analysis of the biological effects of inhaled toxicants. However, the validity of the current in vitro models and their acceptance by regulatory authorities as an alternative to animal models is a reason for concern, and requires a critical review. In this review, focused on human lung epithelial cell cultures as a model for inhalation toxicology, we discuss the choice of cells for these models, the cell culture system used, the method of exposure as well as the various read-outs to assess the cellular response. We argue that rapid developments in the 3D culture of primary epithelial cells, the use of induced pluripotent stem cells for generation of lung epithelial cells and the development of organ-on-a-chip technology are among the important developments that will allow significant advances in this field. Furthermore, we discuss the various routes of application of inhaled toxicants by air-liquid interface models as well as the vast array of read-outs that may provide essential information. We conclude that close collaboration between researchers from various disciplines is essential for development of valid methods that are suitable for replacement of animal studies for inhalation toxicology.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Drogas em Investigação/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos Lab-On-A-Chip , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Respiratória/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos , Administração por Inalação , Aerossóis , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Câmaras de Exposição Atmosférica/tendências , Linhagem Celular , Células Cultivadas , Drogas em Investigação/administração & dosagem , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Células-Tronco Pluripotentes Induzidas/citologia , Células-Tronco Pluripotentes Induzidas/efeitos dos fármacos , Dispositivos Lab-On-A-Chip/tendências , Pulmão/citologia , Pulmão/fisiologia , Microfluídica/tendências , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Mucosa Respiratória/citologia , Mucosa Respiratória/fisiologia , Engenharia Tecidual/tendências , Testes de Toxicidade/instrumentação , Testes de Toxicidade/normas , Testes de Toxicidade/tendências
10.
J Vet Med Educ ; 42(5): 425-40, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26673210

RESUMO

Since the inception of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC), the use of animals in research and education has been a central element of the programs of member institutions. As veterinary education and research programs have evolved over the past 50 years, so too have societal views and regulatory policies. AAVMC member institutions have continually responded to these events by exchanging best practices in training their students in the framework of comparative medicine and the needs of society. Animals provide students and faculty with the tools to learn the fundamental knowledge and skills of veterinary medicine and scientific discovery. The study of animal models has contributed extensively to medicine, veterinary medicine, and basic sciences as these disciplines seek to understand life processes. Changing societal views over the past 50 years have provided active examination and continued refinement of the use of animals in veterinary medical education and research. The future use of animals to educate and train veterinarians will likely continue to evolve as technological advances are applied to experimental design and educational systems. Natural animal models of both human and animal health will undoubtedly continue to serve a significant role in the education of veterinarians and in the development of new treatments of animal and human disease. As it looks to the future, the AAVMC as an organization will need to continue to support and promote best practices in the humane care and appropriate use of animals in both education and research.


Assuntos
Animais de Laboratório , Educação em Veterinária/história , Modelos Animais , Experimentação Animal/história , Experimentação Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/história , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Bem-Estar do Animal/história , Bem-Estar do Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Animais , Educação em Veterinária/métodos , Educação em Veterinária/tendências , História do Século XVIII , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , História Antiga , Vínculo Humano-Animal , Humanos , Estados Unidos
11.
Dongwuxue Yanjiu ; 35(6): 447-64, 2014 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25465081

RESUMO

Non-human primates (NHPs) are phylogenetically close to humans, with many similarities in terms of physiology, anatomy, immunology, as well as neurology, all of which make them excellent experimental models for biomedical research. Compared with developed countries in America and Europe, China has relatively rich primate resources and has continually aimed to develop NHPs resources. Currently, China is a leading producer and a major supplier of NHPs on the international market. However, there are some deficiencies in feeding and management that have hampered China's growth in NHP research and materials. Nonetheless, China has recently established a number of primate animal models for human diseases and achieved marked scientific progress on infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, endocrine diseases, reproductive diseases, neurological diseases, and ophthalmic diseases, etc. Advances in these fields via NHP models will undoubtedly further promote the development of China's life sciences and pharmaceutical industry, and enhance China's position as a leader in NHP research. This review covers the current status of NHPs in China and other areas, highlighting the latest developments in disease models using NHPs, as well as outlining basic problems and proposing effective countermeasures to better utilize NHP resources and further foster NHP research in China.


Assuntos
Experimentação Animal/ética , Experimentação Animal/normas , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Primatas , Animais , Bioética , China , Humanos
12.
Rev. toxicol ; 31(2): 108-114, jul.-dic. 2014. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-133316

RESUMO

Los investigadores deben asegurarse de que la información que podrían obtener con su experimentación no está ya disponible, que no existe otro procedimiento para llevarlo a cabo sin emplear animales y que el protocolo se ha diseñado teniendo en cuenta consideraciones de protección animal. Sin embargo, la identificación de procedimientos alternativos empleados por otros científicos sigue siendo un proceso muy complejo, debido, sobre todo, a la deficiente indexación de las publicaciones en las bases de datos bibliográficas. Una búsqueda eficiente debe basarse en emplear siempre varias bases de datos, en revisar al menos los documentos de los últimos 5-10 años. En primer lugar debe evitarse la duplicación inútil de investigaciones, es decir, asegurarse de que la información que pudiera obtenerse en el estudio no está ya disponible. A continuación se realiza la búsqueda de posibles alternativas de reemplazo. Si ésta no fuera productiva, se identificarían alternativas de reducción y refinamiento, tratando de mejorar, en lo posible, cada una de las fases de la experimentación animal. Los estudios toxicológicos de finalidad reguladora presentan la exigencia de utilizar protocolos oficiales, por lo que deben localizarse en sus directorios específicos. Las alternativas en la enseñanza y entrenamiento, como los modelos mecánicos, audiovisuales y de simulación, se encuentran recogidas en bases de datos específicas. Finalmente, cuando no se encuentran opciones válidas en otras fuentes, es posible recurrir a expertos, tanto directamente como en foros especializados. Todo ello se facilita con el buscador Buscaalternativas.com (http://buscaalternativas.com) (AU)


The researchers should be sure that the information obtainable with the experiments is not yet available, that there is no other possible procedure without the use of animals or that the protocol was designed taking into account animal protection considerations. However, the identification of alternative procedures employed by other scientists is a very complex process, mainly due to the deficient indexation of the articles. An efficient search must be based on the use of several data bases and the review of documents of the last 5-10 years. The search strategy presents several phases. Firstable, the unnecessary duplication of studies should be avoided, assuring the information obtainable in the study is not yet available. A search for replacement alternatives is then carried out. If it is not productive, reduction and refinement alternatives are identified to improve every phase of animal research. Toxicological regulatory studies must use official protocols, which should be localized in specific directories. Alternatives in education and training, including mechanical models, audiovisuals and simulations are included in specific databases. Finally, when no valid options are found in other sources, it is possible to ask experts, directly or through specialized debate lists. The procedure is facilitated thanks to the Web Buscaalternativas.com (http://buscaalternativas.com) (AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Masculino , Feminino , Bem-Estar do Animal/ética , Bem-Estar do Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Modelos Animais , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/métodos , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Comitês de Cuidado Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/educação , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/métodos , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/tendências , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/instrumentação , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/organização & administração , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/normas , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/instrumentação , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/organização & administração , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/normas
13.
Rev. toxicol ; 31(2): 124-129, jul.-dic. 2014. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-133319

RESUMO

En este artículo se hace una revisión sobre la utilización de animales y de métodos alternativos en docencia y se constata que todavía se siguen utilizando animales, a pesar de los avances tecnológicos que permiten cada vez métodos mejores y más efectivos para reemplazar a los animales en las prácticas docentes. Así mismo se analizan las ventajas y las limitaciones que pueden presentar estos métodos y se hace una revisión bibliográfica de los últimos artículos publicados en este sentido. A pesar, de existir muchos docentes que utilizan métodos alternativos, no existen demasiados artículos que nos informen de la situación de las alternativas ni tampoco de los beneficios que aportan a los estudiantes (AU)


This paper is a review on the use of laboratory animals and alternatives methods in education. Laboratory animals are still used despite technological advances that allow better alternative methods and more effectives to replace animals in laboratory practices. Moreover, we analyze the advantages and limitations of these alternative methods and we review the literature of the last years in this field. Although, there are many teachers who use alternative methods, there are not too many papers giving information about the real situation of alternatives neither the benefits for students (AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Masculino , Feminino , Modelos Animais , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/educação , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/métodos , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/educação , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/tendências , Animais de Laboratório , 28574/métodos , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/ética , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/organização & administração , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/normas , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/ética , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/métodos , Experimentação Animal/estatística & dados numéricos , Experimentação Animal/normas
15.
BMB Rep ; 46(7): 335-7, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23884098

RESUMO

Scientists planning research that involves the use of animals are required by international and/or national law to examine the possibilities for the implementation of Replacement, Reduction and/or Refinement (the Three Rs principles of Russell and Burch) in experiments for research, testing, and education. There are two Korean laws legislating humane use of animals and ethical review prior to animal experiments. This report reviews current practice of the literature search by the researchers and protocol review by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees on the Replacement, Reduction and Refinement alternatives in Korea. The promotion and protection of the laboratory animals are one of the core competencies of investigators exploring the ethical conduct of research and good science.


Assuntos
Experimentação Animal/ética , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/educação , Animais de Laboratório , Pesquisa/educação , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Animais , Humanos , República da Coreia
16.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci ; 16(1): 77-95, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23282295

RESUMO

This literature review documents trends in the use of mice in prolonged pain research, defined herein as research that subjects mice to a source of pain for at least 14 days. The total amount of prolonged pain research on mice has increased dramatically in the past decade for the 3 pain categories examined: neuropathic, inflammatory, and chronic pain. There has also been a significant rise in the number of prolonged mouse pain studies as a proportion of all mouse studies and of all mouse pain studies. The use of transgenic mice has also risen significantly in prolonged pain research, though not as a proportion of all mice used in prolonged pain research. There has not been significant overall change in the number of mice being used per study for any of the 3 pain categories or for any of 3 common pain inducement models: chronic constriction injury, partial sciatic nerve ligation, and complete Freund's adjuvant. Finally, although most authors referred to approval of experiments by an institutional nonhuman animal use committee, there were no references to the "3Rs" in a random selection of 55 papers examined. Given the proportionally high volume of mice used in invasive research and the gravity of studies that inflict lasting pain, these trends raise serious questions about whether the 3Rs principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement are being appropriately implemented by researchers and institutions.


Assuntos
Experimentação Animal/ética , Bem-Estar do Animal/tendências , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Camundongos , Dor , Experimentação Animal/estatística & dados numéricos , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/estatística & dados numéricos , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais/tendências , Bem-Estar do Animal/ética , Bem-Estar do Animal/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Dor Crônica , Inflamação , Camundongos Transgênicos , Neuralgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...