Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.096
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 35(7): e14195, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38989807

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complete avoidance of milk is the usual management for IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA). A baked milk ladder is a method of dietary advancement therapy in IgE-mediated CMPA in Ireland, while in Spain, avoidance of milk awaiting natural tolerance acquisition through an oral food challenge (OFC) is employed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of dietary advancement therapy using a milk ladder compared with complete avoidance of milk for managing IgE-mediated CMPA. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 371 pediatric patients from the population who have been treated for IgE-mediated CMPA between 2011 and 2020, with the milk ladder (Ireland) or complete avoidance followed by an OFC (Spain). The main outcome was the introduction of cow's milk. RESULTS: Milk ladder patients were 3.67 times more likely to succeed in comparison with milk avoidance (p < .001). Anaphylaxis during the treatment period occurred in 34 patients in the milk avoidance groups, while three patients in the milk ladder group experienced anaphylaxis due to accidental exposure to milk (p < .001). Failure to complete treatment was associated with a higher skin prick test in the milk avoidance group and a raised specific IgE in the milk ladder group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that compares outcomes of dietary advancement therapy to complete avoidance for CMPA management, demonstrating that cow's milk can be successfully and safely reintroduced using dietary advancement therapy using a milk ladder.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulina E , Hipersensibilidade a Leite , Proteínas do Leite , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Animais , Proteínas do Leite/imunologia , Criança , Lactente , Espanha , Leite/imunologia , Irlanda , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Testes Cutâneos , Tolerância Imunológica , Bovinos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(4): 268-275, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982604

RESUMO

Background: Being stung by Hymenoptera species can cause life-threatening anaphylaxis. Although venom immunotherapy (VIT) seems to be the most effective treatment, its long-term efficacy, and risk factors for adverse events remain unclear. Objective: The objective was to investigate the long-term efficacy of VIT and evaluate adverse events and risk factors related to this. Method: Patients who received VIT in a tertiary-care adult allergy clinic between January 2005 and July 2022 were included. Patients' data were compared with those of individuals who had been diagnosed with bee and/or wasp venom allergy during the same period but had not received VIT and experienced field re-stings. Results: The study included 105 patients with venom allergy, of whom 68 received VIT and 37 did not receive VIT. Twenty-three patients (34%) completed 5 years of VIT, and the overall mean ± standard deviation VIT duration was 46.9 ± 20.9 months. Re-stings occurred in 5 of 23 patients who completed 5 years of VIT, and none of them developed a systemic reaction. Eighteen patients (40%) experienced re-stings after prematurely discontinuing VIT, of whom eight (44%) developed a systemic reaction. In the control group of patients who did not receive VIT, 26 patients (70.3%) experienced re-stings, and all had systemic reactions (100%), with no change in their median Mueller scores. There was a significant difference in the median Mueller score change between the patients who received VIT and the controls who did not (p = 0.016). A total of 13 patients (19%) experienced adverse events while receiving VIT, which were systemic reactions in nine honeybee VIT. The use of ß-blockers was determined as the most important risk factor (odds ratio 15.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-208.8]; p = 0.035). Conclusion: It was confirmed that VIT was effective in both reducing the incidence and the severity of re-sting reactions. These effects were more pronounced in the patients who completed 5 years of VIT.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Venenos de Abelha , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Himenópteros , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Animais , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/imunologia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Venenos de Abelha/imunologia , Venenos de Abelha/uso terapêutico , Venenos de Abelha/efeitos adversos , Himenópteros/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Venenos de Vespas/imunologia , Venenos de Vespas/efeitos adversos , Venenos de Vespas/uso terapêutico , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Venenos de Artrópodes/imunologia , Venenos de Artrópodes/efeitos adversos , Venenos de Artrópodes/uso terapêutico , Hipersensibilidade/terapia
3.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1258369, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933266

RESUMO

Autoantigen-specific immunotherapy using peptides offers a more targeted approach to treat autoimmune diseases, but clinical implementation has been challenging. We previously showed that multivalent delivery of peptides as soluble antigen arrays (SAgAs) efficiently protects against spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse model. Here, we compared the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of SAgAs versus free peptides. SAgAs, but not their corresponding free peptides at equivalent doses, efficiently prevented the development of diabetes. SAgAs increased the frequency of regulatory T cells among peptide-specific T cells or induce their anergy/exhaustion or deletion, depending on the type of SAgA used (hydrolysable (hSAgA) and non-hydrolysable 'click' SAgA (cSAgA)) and duration of treatment, whereas their corresponding free peptides induced a more effector phenotype following delayed clonal expansion. Over time, the peptides induced an IgE-independent anaphylactic reaction, the incidence of which was significantly delayed when peptides were in SAgA form rather than in free form. Moreover, the N-terminal modification of peptides with aminooxy or alkyne linkers, which was needed for grafting onto hyaluronic acid to make hSAgA or cSAgA variants, respectively, influenced their stimulatory potency and safety, with alkyne-functionalized peptides being more potent and less anaphylactogenic than aminooxy-functionalized peptides. Immunologic anaphylaxis occurred in NOD mice in a dose-dependent manner but not in C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice; however, its incidence did not correlate with the level of anti-peptide antibodies. We provide evidence that SAgAs significantly improve the efficacy of peptides to induce tolerance and prevent autoimmune diabetes while at the same time reducing their anaphylactogenic potential.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Tolerância Imunológica , Camundongos Endogâmicos NOD , Peptídeos , Animais , Camundongos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Peptídeos/imunologia , Peptídeos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Autoantígenos/imunologia , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Imunoterapia/métodos , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos
4.
J Food Sci ; 89(5): 3037-3047, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563099

RESUMO

Bovine casein is a major allergen present in cow milk to induce anaphylaxis. In this study, the potential allergenicity of enzymatically hydrolyzed casein (HC) was evaluated based on in vitro and in vivo. The results showed that Alcalase and Protamex treatment (AT, PT) reduced the potential allergenicity of CN, with the greatest reductions of 68.25% and 50.75%, respectively. In addition, in vivo results showed that HC effectively alleviated allergic response symptoms of Balb/c mice; a significant tendency toward decreased serum IgG1 and mast cell tryptase levels was observed, accompanied by a decrease of Th2-associated IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and an increase of IFN-γ levels in spleen. Moreover, the inflammation of the lung, jejunum, and ileum was remarkably ameliorated. The findings indicated that HC induced a shift toward Th1 response and maintained the Th1/Th2 immune balance. Importantly, our results provide the basis for the production of hypoallergenic dairy products.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Caseínas , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Células Th2 , Animais , Camundongos , Caseínas/imunologia , Alérgenos/imunologia , Feminino , Células Th2/imunologia , Hidrólise , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Bovinos , Baço/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/imunologia , Interferon gama/metabolismo , Células Th1/imunologia , Interleucina-4/metabolismo , Triptases/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Jejuno/imunologia , Leite/imunologia , Leite/química , Interleucina-13/imunologia , Interleucina-13/metabolismo , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Interleucina-5/imunologia
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 154(1): 222-228.e4, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521096

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute infusion reactions to oxaliplatin, a chemotherapeutic used to treat gastrointestinal cancers, are observed in about 20% of patients. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) protocols often allow the continuation of oxaliplatin in patients with no alternative options. Breakthrough symptoms, including anaphylaxis, can still occur during RDD. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate whether pretreatment with acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can prevent anaphylaxis during RDD in a patient sensitized to oxaliplatin. METHODS: A 52-year-old male with locally advanced gastric carcinoma developed anaphylaxis during his fifth cycle of oxaliplatin. As he required 6 additional cycles to complete his curative-intent treatment regimen, he underwent RDD to oxaliplatin but still developed severe acute reactions. The risks and benefits of adding acalabrutinib before and during RDD were reviewed, and the patient elected to proceed. RESULTS: With acalabrutinib taken before and during the RDD, the patient was able to tolerate oxaliplatin RDD without complication. Consistent with its mechanism of action, acalabrutinib completely blocked the patient's positive skin prick response to oxaliplatin. Acalabrutinib did not alter the percentage of circulating basophils (1.24% vs 0.98%) before the RDD but did protect against basopenia (0.74% vs 0.09%) after the RDD. Acalabrutinib was associated with a drastic reduction in the ability of basophils to upregulate CD63 in vitro following incubation with oxaliplatin (0.11% vs 2.38%) or polyclonal anti-human IgE antibody (0.08% vs 44.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Five doses of acalabrutinib, 100 mg, orally twice daily starting during the evening 2 days before and continuing through RDD allowed a sensitized patient to receive oxaliplatin successfully and safely.


Assuntos
Tirosina Quinase da Agamaglobulinemia , Antineoplásicos , Benzamidas , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Oxaliplatina , Pirazinas , Humanos , Oxaliplatina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Tirosina Quinase da Agamaglobulinemia/antagonistas & inibidores , Pirazinas/efeitos adversos , Pirazinas/administração & dosagem , Pirazinas/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/imunologia
6.
ACS Nano ; 18(12): 8733-8744, 2024 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469811

RESUMO

Covalent conjugation of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) is frequently employed to enhance the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of various protein and nanoparticle therapeutics. Unfortunately, some PEGylated drugs can induce elevated levels of antibodies that can bind PEG, i.e., anti-PEG antibodies (APA), in some patients. APA in turn can reduce the efficacy and increase the risks of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. There is currently no intervention available in the clinic that specifically mitigates allergic reactions to PEGylated drugs without the use of broad immunosuppression. We previously showed that infusion of high molecular weight free PEG could safely and effectively suppress the induction of APA in mice and restore prolonged circulation of various PEGylated therapeutics. Here, we explored the effectiveness of free PEG as a prophylaxis against anaphylaxis induced by PEG-specific allergic reactions in swine. Injection of PEG-liposomes (PL) resulted in anaphylactoid shock (pseudoanaphylaxis) within 1-3 min in both naïve and PL-sensitized swine. In contrast, repeated injection of free PEG alone did not result in allergic reactions, and injection of free PEG effectively suppressed allergic reactions to PL, including in previously PL-sensitized swine. These results strongly support the further investigation of free PEG for reducing APA and allergic responses to PEGylated therapeutics.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Animais , Suínos , Camundongos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Distribuição Tecidual , Nanomedicina , Polietilenoglicóis/farmacologia , Anticorpos/metabolismo , Lipossomos/farmacologia
7.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 24(3): 153-159, 2024 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538146

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food allergy is a growing health problem that affects both patients and society in multiple ways. Despite the emergence of novel diagnostic tools, such as component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) and basophil activation tests (BAT), oral food challenge (OFC) still plays an indispensable role in the management of food allergies. This review aimed to highlight the indications and safety concerns of conducting an OFC and to provide insights into post-OFC management based on recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Standardized OFC protocols have regional diversification, especially in Japan and Western countries. Recent studies suggested that the interval between doses should be at least more than an hour. Furthermore, applying a stepwise method tailored to the patient's specific immunoglobulin E level and history of anaphylaxis seems to mitigate these risks. Recent surveys have shown that, following a positive OFC, options other than strict avoidance are also selected. SUMMARY: OFC serves diverse purposes, yet the risks it carries warrant caution. The stepwise protocol appears promising for its safety. Subthreshold consumption following OFC shows potential; however, further research on its efficacy and safety is required. Management following OFC should be tailored and well discussed between clinicians and patients.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Administração Oral , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/terapia , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Alimentos/efeitos adversos
8.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(2): 32-44, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459888

RESUMO

The incidence of food allergies has risen around the globe, and experts have been exploring methods of preventing such allergies in young children to ease the burden of disease and reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by anaphylaxis to food allergens. Such preventative measures can be categorised as primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, which are discussed in detail in this review. Primary prevention is defined as the prevention of becoming sensitised towards specific allergens. The evidence suggests that avoiding common allergenic foods during pregnancy and breastfeeding is not protective against food allergies, and guidelines recommend weaning from 4 to 6 months of age, with recent studies supporting the early introduction of peanuts at 4 months to prevent peanut allergy. Secondary prevention targets patients who are already sensitised and aims to halt the progression of sensitisation, with evidence for high rates of success and safety in trials of early introduction to milk and peanuts using oral immunotherapy in sensitised infants. Tertiary allergy prevention focuses on reducing the risk of a patient having anaphylaxis, with oral immunotherapy being the most common method of promoting tolerance in allergic children. Several studies have demonstrated successful reintroduction for milk, egg and peanut; however, no such guidelines are recommended for other foods. Finally, dietary advancement therapy in the form of milk and egg ladders has been employed as a method of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of allergies, particularly in Ireland, the UK and Canada.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Lactente , Criança , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Terciária , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Aleitamento Materno , Dieta/métodos , Alérgenos , Arachis
9.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 52(2): 32-44, mar. 2024. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-231093

RESUMO

The incidence of food allergies has risen around the globe, and experts have been exploring methods of preventing such allergies in young children to ease the burden of disease and reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by anaphylaxis to food allergens. Such preventative measures can be categorised as primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, which are discussed in detail in this review. Primary prevention is defined as the prevention of becoming sensitised towards specific allergens. The evidence suggests that avoiding common allergenic foods during pregnancy and breastfeeding is not protective against food allergies, and guidelines recommend weaning from 4 to 6 months of age, with recent studies supporting the early introduction of peanuts at 4 months to prevent peanut allergy. Secondary prevention targets patients who are already sensitised and aims to halt the progression of sensitisation, with evidence for high rates of success and safety in trials of early introduction to milk and peanuts using oral immunotherapy in sensitised infants. Tertiary allergy prevention focuses on reducing the risk of a patient having anaphylaxis, with oral immunotherapy being the most common method of promoting tolerance in allergic children. Several studies have demonstrated successful reintroduction for milk, egg and peanut; however, no such guidelines are recommended for other foods. Finally, dietary advancement therapy in the form of milk and egg ladders has been employed as a method of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of allergies, particularly in Ireland, the UK and Canada.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Prevenção Primária , Prevenção Secundária , Prevenção Terciária , Incidência , Anafilaxia/mortalidade , Alergia e Imunologia , Hipersensibilidade , Pediatria , Prevenção de Doenças , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle
10.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1299484, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380329

RESUMO

Introduction: Peanut allergy is an immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy. Rubia cordifolia L. (R. cordifolia), a Chinese herbal medicine, protects against peanut-induced anaphylaxis by suppressing IgE production in vivo. This study aims to identify IgE-inhibitory compounds from the water extract of R. cordifolia and investigate the underlying mechanisms using in vitro and in vivo models. Methods: Compounds were isolated from R. cordifolia water extract and their bioactivity on IgE production was assessed using a human myeloma U266 cell line. The purified active compound, xanthopurpurin (XPP), was identified by LC-MS and NMR. Peanut-allergic C3H/HeJ mice were orally administered with or without XPP at 200µg or 400µg per mouse per day for 4 weeks. Serum peanut-specific IgE levels, symptom scores, body temperatures, and plasma histamine levels were measured at challenge. Cytokines in splenocyte cultures were determined by ELISA, and IgE + B cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Acute and sub-chronic toxicity were evaluated. IL-4 promoter DNA methylation, RNA-Seq, and qPCR analysis were performed to determine the regulatory mechanisms of XPP. Results: XPP significantly and dose-dependently suppressed the IgE production in U266 cells. XPP significantly reduced peanut-specific IgE (>80%, p <0.01), and plasma histamine levels and protected the mice against peanut-allergic reactions in both early and late treatment experiments (p < 0.05, n=9). XPP showed a strong protective effect even 5 weeks after discontinuing the treatment. XPP significantly reduced the IL-4 level without affecting IgG or IgA and IFN-γ production. Flow cytometry data showed that XPP reduced peripheral and bone marrow IgE + B cells compared to the untreated group. XPP increased IL-4 promoter methylation. RNA-Seq and RT-PCR experiments revealed that XPP regulated the gene expression of CCND1, DUSP4, SDC1, ETS1, PTPRC, and IL6R, which are related to plasma cell IgE production. All safety testing results were in the normal range. Conclusions: XPP successfully protected peanut-allergic mice against peanut anaphylaxis by suppressing IgE production. XPP suppresses murine IgE-producing B cell numbers and inhibits IgE production and associated genes in human plasma cells. XPP may be a potential therapy for IgE-mediated food allergy.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim , Camundongos , Humanos , Animais , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/terapia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Histamina , Interleucina-4 , Medula Óssea , Camundongos Endogâmicos C3H , Imunoglobulina E , Água
13.
J Clin Anesth ; 94: 111377, 2024 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241788

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of cefazolin perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) in patients with and without a penicillin allergy label (PAL) to determine whether the prevalence of cefazolin POA differs based on the presence of a PAL. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A large U.S. healthcare system in the Baltimore-D.C. region, July 2017 to July 2020. PATIENTS: 112,817 surgical encounters across inpatient and outpatient settings in various specialties, involving 90,089 patients. Of these, 4876 (4.3%) encounters had a PAL. INTERVENTIONS: Perioperative cefazolin administration within 4 h before surgery to 4 h after the procedure began. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was cefazolin POA in patients with and without PALs. Potential POA cases were identified based on tryptase orders or diphenhydramine administrations within the initial cefazolin administration to 6 h postoperatively. Verification included two validation steps. The first checked for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) documentation, and the second, led by Allergy specialists, identified POA and the probable culprit. The secondary outcome looked at cefazolin use trends in patients with a PAL, stratified by setting and specialty. MAIN RESULTS: Of 112,817 encounters, 1421 (1.3%) had possible cefazolin HSRs. Of these, 22 (1.5%) had POA, resulting in a 0.02% prevalence. Of these, 13 (59.1%) were linked to cefazolin and 9 (40.9%) attributed to other drugs. Only one cefazolin POA case had a PAL, indicating no significant difference in cefazolin POA prevalence between patients with and without PALs (p = 0.437). Perioperative cefazolin use in patients with PALs steadily increased from 2.6% to 6.0% between 2017 and 2020, specifically in academic settings. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cefazolin POA does not exhibit significant differences between patients with and without PALs, and notably, the incidence remains remarkably low. Based on these findings, it is advisable to view cefazolin as an acceptable choice for prophylaxis in patients carrying a PAL.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Humanos , Cefazolina/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos
14.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 42(1): 1-13, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165149

RESUMO

Fish allergy is one of the "big nine" categories of food allergens worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing with the higher demand for this nutritious food source. Fish allergies are a significant health concern as it is a leading cause of food anaphylaxis, accounting for 9% of all deaths from anaphylaxis. The gaps in treating fish allergies at present are the incomplete identification of fish allergens, lack of component-resolved diagnosis of fish allergens in the clinical setting, and the variability in sensitization profiles based on different fish consumption practices. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) improves tolerance towards accidental consumption of fish and is longer lasting than pharmacotherapy. Current practice or research of fish AIT ranges from the use of whole fish via oral desensitization, to the use of purified recombinant parvalbumin and its hypoallergenic variant, passive IgG immunization, and modifying the allergenicity of parvalbumin by changing the diet of farmed fish. However, the focus of fish allergen-based studies in the context of AIT has been restricted to parvalbumins. More research is required to understand the involvement of other fish allergens, and several other strategies of AIT including peptide vaccines, DNA vaccines, hybrid allergens, and the use of nanobodies that have the capacity to treat multiple allergens have been proposed. For AIT, other important aspects to consider are the route of desensitization, and the biomarkers to assess the success of immunotherapy. Finally, we also address several clinical considerations for fish AIT.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Animais , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Parvalbuminas/genética , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Alérgenos
15.
Nursing ; 54(2): 33-35, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271128

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: In the US, sesame was recognized as the ninth major food allergen in 2021, underscoring the importance of updated allergen labeling to facilitate effective prevention plans and anaphylaxis response. This article discusses the prevalence of sesame seed allergy among children in the US and outlines strategies for nurses to understand the assessment, treatment, and education of patients regarding this allergen.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Sesamum , Criança , Humanos , Sesamum/efeitos adversos , Sementes/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Alérgenos
16.
Mol Biotechnol ; 66(1): 26-33, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36988875

RESUMO

The occurrence of allergy, a type I hypersensitivity reaction, is rising exponentially all over the world. Sometimes, allergy proves to be fatal for atopic patients, due to the occurrence of anaphylaxis. This study is aimed to find an anti-allergic agent that can inhibit the binding of IgE to Human High Affinity IgE Receptor (FCεRI), thereby preventing the degranulation of mast cells. A considerable number of potential anti-allergic compounds were assessed for their inhibitory strength through ADMET studies. AUTODOCK was used for estimating the binding energy between anti-allergic compounds and FCεRI, along with the interacting amino acids. The docked pose showing favorable binding energy was subjected to molecular dynamics simulation study. Marrubiin, a diterpenoid lactone from Lamiaceae, and epicatechin-3-gallate appears to be effective in blocking the Human High Affinity IgE Receptor (FCεRI). This in-silico study proposes the use of marrubiin and epicatechin-3-gallate, in the downregulation of allergic responses. Due to the better inhibition constant, future direction of this study is to analyze the safety and efficacy of marrubiin in anti-allergic activities through in-vivo clinical human trials.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Antialérgicos , Diterpenos , Hipersensibilidade , Humanos , Antialérgicos/farmacologia , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Receptores de IgE/química , Receptores de IgE/metabolismo , Receptores de IgE/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E/química , Imunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Imunoglobulina E/uso terapêutico , Imunoinformática , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipersensibilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade/metabolismo , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle
17.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 132(2): 124-176, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108678

RESUMO

This practice parameter update focuses on 7 areas in which there are new evidence and new recommendations. Diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis have been revised, and patterns of anaphylaxis are defined. Measurement of serum tryptase is important for diagnosis of anaphylaxis and to identify underlying mast cell disorders. In infants and toddlers, age-specific symptoms may differ from older children and adults, patient age is not correlated with reaction severity, and anaphylaxis is unlikely to be the initial reaction to an allergen on first exposure. Different community settings for anaphylaxis require specific measures for prevention and treatment of anaphylaxis. Optimal prescribing and use of epinephrine autoinjector devices require specific counseling and training of patients and caregivers, including when and how to administer the epinephrine autoinjector and whether and when to call 911. If epinephrine is used promptly, immediate activation of emergency medical services may not be required if the patient experiences a prompt, complete, and durable response. For most medical indications, the risk of stopping or changing beta-blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor medication may exceed the risk of more severe anaphylaxis if the medication is continued, especially in patients with insect sting anaphylaxis. Evaluation for mastocytosis, including a bone marrow biopsy, should be considered for adult patients with severe insect sting anaphylaxis or recurrent idiopathic anaphylaxis. After perioperative anaphylaxis, repeat anesthesia may proceed in the context of shared decision-making and based on the history and results of diagnostic evaluation with skin tests or in vitro tests when available, and supervised challenge when necessary.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos , Mastocitose , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/tratamento farmacológico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Mastocitose/diagnóstico , Alérgenos
18.
Cell Rep Med ; 5(1): 101346, 2024 01 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38128531

RESUMO

The only FDA-approved oral immunotherapy for a food allergy provides protection against accidental exposure to peanuts. However, this therapy often causes discomfort or side effects and requires long-term commitment. Better preventive and therapeutic solutions are urgently needed. We develop a tolerance-inducing vaccine technology that utilizes glycosylation-modified antigens to induce antigen-specific non-responsiveness. The glycosylation-modified antigens are administered intravenously (i.v.) or subcutaneously (s.c.) and traffic to the liver or lymph nodes, respectively, leading to preferential internalization by antigen-presenting cells, educating the immune system to respond in an innocuous way. In a mouse model of cow's milk allergy, treatment with glycosylation-modified ß-lactoglobulin (BLG) is effective in preventing the onset of allergy. In addition, s.c. administration of glycosylation-modified BLG shows superior safety and potential in treating existing allergies in combination with anti-CD20 co-therapy. This platform provides an antigen-specific immunomodulatory strategy to prevent and treat food allergies.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Hipersensibilidade a Leite , Vacinas , Camundongos , Animais , Feminino , Bovinos , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Glicosilação , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/prevenção & controle , Lactoglobulinas/metabolismo
19.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 23(6): 514-519, 2023 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37846900

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review discusses allergen immunotherapy (AIT) safety in children. RECENT FINDINGS: AIT is a well tolerated and effective treatment for pediatric allergic conditions. While mostly well tolerated, severe reactions and near fatal reactions may occur with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) once in every 160 000 visits. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is associated more with local side effects, but severe systemic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been rarely reported. Providing informed consent, recognizing risk factors for severe systemic reactions, such as severe or uncontrolled asthma, and mitigating the risk of severe reactions are important components to improving the safety of AIT. SUMMARY: Overall, AIT is well tolerated in children, and data suggest that the incidence of systemic reactions in children receiving SCIT is no less than mixed populations of adult and pediatric patients. SLIT carries less risk for systemic reactions, and local oral site-application reactions are usually mild and resolve within 15 days of treatment.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Asma , Rinite Alérgica , Imunoterapia Sublingual , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Asma/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Injeções Subcutâneas , Alérgenos , Rinite Alérgica/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...