A phase II, non-comparative randomised trial of two treatments involving liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in India and Bangladesh.

BACKGROUND: In Southeast Asia, treatment is recommended for all patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Adherence to the first-line regimen, twelve weeks of miltefosine (MF), is low and ocular toxicity has been observed with this exposure period. We assessed the safety and efficacy of two shorter-course treatments: liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) alone and combined with MF. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: An open-label, phase II, randomized, parallel-arm, non-comparative trial was conducted in patients with parasitologically confirmed PKDL, 6 to ≤60 years. Patients were assigned to 20 mg/kg LAmB (total dose, in five injections over 15 days) alone or combined with allometric MF (3 weeks). The primary endpoint was definitive cure at 12 months, defined as complete resolution of papular and nodular lesions and >80% re-pigmentation of macular lesions. Definitive cure at 24 months was a secondary efficacy endpoint. 118/126 patients completed the trial. Definitive cure at 12 months was observed in 29% (18/63) patients receiving LAmB and 30% (19/63) receiving LAmB/MF (mITT), increasing to 58% and 66%, respectively, at 24 months. Most lesions had resolved/improved at 12 and 24 months for patients receiving LAmB (90%, 83%) and LAmB/MF (85%, 88%) by qualitative assessment. One death, unrelated to study drugs, was reported; no study drug-related serious adverse events were observed. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were MF-related vomiting and nausea, and LAmB-related hypokalaemia and infusion reactions. Most adverse events were mild; no ocular adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Both regimens are suitably safe and efficacious alternatives to long-course MF for PKDL in South Asia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2017/04/008421.

Liposomal amphotericin for secondary prophylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) compared to other antifungal agents for secondary prophylaxis. METHOD: We conducted a comprehensive search across international databases and reference lists of articles to compile all relevant published evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of L-AMB versus other antifungals (NLAMB) for secondary prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections. Pooled estimates were calculated after data transformation to evaluate mortality, breakthrough infections, and the frequency of adverse effects, including hypokalemia and nephrotoxicity. Comparisons of breakthrough fungal infection and mortality between the L-AMB and NLAMB groups were performed. RESULT: We identified 10 studies. The cumulative frequency of patients using L-AMB was 148, compared to 341 patients in the NLAMB group. The mortality rates in the L-AMB and NLAMB groups were 10% and 0%, respectively. However, based on the odds ratio, the mortality in the L-AMB group was lower than that in the NLAMB group. No significant difference was observed in breakthrough invasive fungal infections between the L-AMB and NLAMB groups. The frequencies of nephropathy and hypokalemia in the L-AMB group were 36% and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a lower incidence of mortality in the L-AMB group compared to the NLAMB group. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of breakthrough infection between the two groups. L-AMB administration is associated with nephropathy and hypokalemia. However, the refusal to continue treatment due to adverse effects is not significantly high.

Application and evaluation of topical amphotericin B for the treatment of respiratory fungal infections.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the prevalence of respiratory fungal diseases has increased. Polyene antifungal drugs play a pivotal role in the treatment of these conditions, with amphotericin B (AmB) being the most representative drug. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical administration of AmB in the treatment of respiratory fungal infections. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on hospitalized patients treated with topical administered AmB for respiratory fungal infections from January 2014 to June 2023. RESULTS: Data from 36 patients with invasive pulmonary fungal infections treated with topical administration of AmB were collected and analyzed. Nebulization was administered to 27 patients. After the treatment, 17 patients evidenced improved conditions, whereas 10 patients did not respond and died in the hospital. One patient experienced an irritating cough as an adverse reaction. Seven patients underwent tracheoscopic instillation, and two received intrapleural irrigation; they achieved good clinical therapeutic efficacy without adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The combined application of systemic antifungal treatment and topical administration of AmB yielded good therapeutic efficacy and was well-tolerated by the patients. Close monitoring of routine blood tests, liver and kidney function, and levels of electrolytes, troponin, and B-type natriuretic peptide supported this conclusion.

Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Different Amphotericin B Formulations in Invasive Fungal Infections: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study.

PURPOSE: Data on the real-life use of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) compared with other available formulations are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of different amphotericin B (AMB) intravenously administered in the context of hospital practice for the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFI) and to provide new insights into the profile of ABLC. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted at 10 tertiary Brazilian hospitals. Patients first exposed to any formulation of AMB for treating endemic and opportunistic IFI who had received at least 2 intravenous doses were screened. Retrospective data (from January 2014 to December 2019) were extracted from the patients' medical records. Clinical parameters were examined pre- and post-treatment to determine effectiveness; acute infusion-related side effects (IRSE) and drug interruption to determine tolerability; and adverse events, toxicity, and treatment interruption were stated to analyze safety. FINDINGS: Overall, 1879 medical records of patients were identified. The median (interquartile rate) duration of treatment was 14 (7-21) days. The overall success rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 65% (95% CI 60-65). ABLC proved to be effective among AMB formulations with 59% (95% CI 55.6-62.5) within complete response. This was significantly higher in patients who received the drug for a longer period, ≥4 weeks compared to <1 week treatment (P < 0.001). IRSE was observed in 446 (23.7%) patients. Eight cases (1.4%) of severe IRSE in pediatrics and 14 (1.1%) in adults resulted in treatment discontinuation. Regarding safety, 637 (33.9%) patients presented some alteration in creatinine levels during AMB exposure, and 89 (4.74%) had to interrupt or discontinue the drug within the first 14 days of therapy because of renal dysfunction. Overall mortality was 34%. IMPLICATIONS: ABLC is an effective formulation for the treatment of invasive fungal infections, with few adverse events leading to drug discontinuation or lethal outcomes. Furthermore, this real-life study confirmed the comparative safety of AMB lipid formulations versus AMB deoxycholate.

Comparison of the safety and cost-effectiveness of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B and amphotericin B deoxycholate for antifungal prophylaxis after lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Fungal infection after lung transplantation can lead to poor clinical outcome, for which lung transplant recipients require prophylaxis. One of the antifungal agents used after lung transplantation is nebulized amphotericin B (AMB). Nebulized AMB causes adverse events such as dyspnea and airway irritation, and long-term use leads to high economic costs. So far, prophylactic regimens employing AMB deoxycholate (AMB-d) and liposomal AMB (L-AMB) have been developed. This study compared the efficacy, safety, and cost of AMB-d and L-AMB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent lung transplantation at Kyoto University Hospital from January 2021 to May 2023 were included in this study. Thirty-three patients received nebulized AMB-d, whereas 29 received nebulized L-AMB. RESULTS: Both regimens maintained comparable prophylactic efficacy regarding the development of fungal infection in the AMB-d and L-AMB groups (3.0% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.877). Patients treated with nebulized L-AMB experienced fewer respiratory-related adverse reactions than those treated with nebulized AMB-d (6.9% vs. 30.3%, P < 0.05), leading to a longer treatment duration with L-AMB than with AMB-d. Additionally, the daily cost of administering L-AMB was lower than that of administering AMB-d (3609 Japanese yen vs. 1792.3 Japanese yen, P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that nebulized L-AMB is safer and more cost-effective than nebulized AMB-d, with comparable efficacy.

Early Experiences with Intrathecal Administration of Amphotericin B Liposomal Formulation at a Neurosurgical Center.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal administration of amphotericin B represents an important adjunctive therapy for management of severe fungal meningitis. Intrathecal preparations have traditionally used amphotericin B deoxycholate. Liposomal amphotericin B is an alternative formulation with good clinical outcomes as systemic therapy, but scant data exist investigating intrathecal use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate outcomes following intrathecal administration of liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of severe fungal meningitis. METHODS: A national shortage of amphotericin B deoxycholate necessitated revision of institutional protocols at a southwestern neurosurgical center in Spring 2023. A starting intrathecal daily dose of 0.125-0.5 mg liposomal amphotericin B was recommended (dependent on insertion device), with 0.125-0.25 mg slow titration every 48 h and up to a 2 mg maximum daily dose. RESULTS: Four cases of fungal meningitis treated with adjunctive intrathecal amphotericin B liposomal formulation were reviewed. This included three cases of coccidioidal meningitis and one case of presumed Fusarium solani meningitis following an outbreak. All patients had initial disease improvement following initiation of intrathecal amphotericin B and were able to tolerate long-term therapy. One coccidioidal meningitis patient expired of neurologic complications shortly after being moved from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a floor unit. All other patients were successfully discharged from the hospital. New headache was the only reported adverse effect, which was managed with dose reduction and did not require therapy discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal amphotericin B may be feasibly administered intrathecally for the adjunctive treatment of severe fungal meningitis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of liposomal amphotericin B in children. Are we there yet? A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a tool that supports personalized dosing, but its role for liposomal amphotericin B (L-amb) is unclear. This systematic review assessed the evidence for L-amb TDM in children. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concentration-efficacy relationship, concentration-toxicity relationship and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) variability of L-amb in children. METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included L-amb PK/PD studies in children aged 0-18 years. Review articles, case series of 600 mg·h/L for nephrotoxicity. L-amb doses of 2.5-10 mg/kg/day were reported to achieve Cmax/MIC > 25 using an MIC of 1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: While significant PK variability was observed in children, evidence to support routine L-amb TDM was limited. Further studies on efficacy and toxicity benefits are required before routine TDM of L-amb can be recommended.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B and analysis of the relationship between pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety in patients with hematological diseases.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify factors responsible for changes in blood concentrations of a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AMPH-B, L-AMB) and analyze the relationships between blood concentrations and efficacy or toxicity. METHODS: L-AMB was administered to 30 patients being treated for hematological diseases. AMPH-B plasma concentrations were determined right before the initiation (Cmin) and at the end (Cmax) of infusion on at least 1 day, beginning on Day 3 of L-AMB treatment. The relationships of Cmin divided by dose (C/D ratio) to body weight, age, hepatic function, renal function, serum albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), response, hypokalemia, and renal impairment were evaluated. RESULTS: C/D ratio was not correlated with age, hepatic function, renal function, or serum albumin. Body weight adjusted C/D ratio was negatively correlated with CRP. Cmax and Cmin were compared between responders and non-responders, those with or without hypokalemia, and those with or without renal impairment. A higher Cmax in patients with hypokalemia was the only significant difference seen. CONCLUSIONS: The negative correlation between CRP and plasma concentrations was likely caused by higher distribution of L-AMB from the blood to infected tissue in patients with a greater degree of infection, with a resulting decrease in plasma concentrations. AMPH-B plasma concentrations were not related to response. Higher Cmax of AMPH-B were observed in patients with hypokalemia, but no relationship between plasma concentration and renal toxicity was observed, suggesting that AMPH-B plasma concentrations appear to be minimally related to PD when used as L-AMB.

Severe anemia, severe leukopenia, and severe thrombocytopenia of amphotericin B deoxycholate-based induction therapy in patients with HIV-associated talaromycosis: a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study's objective was to investigate the predictors for severe anemia, severe leukopenia, and severe thrombocytopenia when amphotericin B deoxycholate-based induction therapy is used in HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis. METHODS: A total of 170 HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis were enrolled from January 1st, 2019, to September 30th, 2020. RESULTS: Approximately 42.9%, 20.6%, and 10.6% of the enrolled patients developed severe anemia, severe leukopenia, and severe thrombocytopenia, respectively. Baseline hemoglobin level < 100 g/L (OR = 5.846, 95% CI: 2.765 ~ 12.363), serum creatinine level > 73.4 µmol/L (OR = 2.573, 95% CI: 1.157 ~ 5.723), AST/ALT ratio > 1.6 (OR = 2.479, 95% CI: 1.167 ~ 5.266), sodium level ≤ 136 mmol/liter (OR = 4.342, 95% CI: 1.747 ~ 10.789), and a dose of amphotericin B deoxycholate > 0.58 mg/kg/d (OR = 2.504, 95% CI:1.066 ~ 5.882) were observed to be independent risk factors associated with the development of severe anemia. Co-infection with tuberculosis (OR = 3.307, 95% CI: 1.050 ~ 10.420), and platelet level (per 10 × 109 /L) (OR = 0.952, 95% CI: 0.911 ~ 0.996) were shown to be independent risk factors associated with the development of severe leukopenia. Platelet level < 100 × 109 /L (OR = 2.935, 95% CI: 1.075 ~ 8.016) was identified as the independent risk factor associated with the development of severe thrombocytopenia. There was no difference in progression to severe anemia, severe leukopenia, and severe thrombocytopenia between the patients with or without fungal clearance at 2 weeks. 10 mg on the first day of amphotericin B deoxycholate was calculated to be independent risk factors associated with the development of severe anemia (OR = 2.621, 95% CI: 1.107 ~ 6.206). The group receiving a starting amphotericin B dose (10 mg, 20 mg, daily) exhibited the highest fungal clearance rate at 96.3%, which was significantly better than the group receiving a starting amphotericin B dose (5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, daily) (60.9%) and the group receiving a starting amphotericin B dose (5 mg, 15 mg, and 25 mg, daily) (62.9%). CONCLUSION: The preceding findings reveal risk factors for severe anemia, severe leukopenia, and severe thrombocytopenia. After treatment with Amphotericin B, these severe adverse events are likely unrelated to fungal clearance at 2 weeks. Starting amphotericin B deoxycholate at a dose of 10 mg on the first day may increase the risk of severe anemia but can lead to earlier fungal clearance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900021195. Registered 1 February 2019.

Prophylactic use amphotericin B use in patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use amphotericin B in patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data database and the China Clinical Trials Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of amphotericin B for patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia from inception to May 2023. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs was used to assess the bias risk of the included studies. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 6 studies with a total of 1019 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of the fungal infection rate, and the differences were statistically significant [RR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.32, 0.69), P < 0.0001]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mortality [RR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.61, 1.23), P = 0.43] and the incidence of colonization [OR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.25, 1.03), P = 0.06]. The evidence shows that amphotericin B prophylactic use for patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia can decrease the fungal infection rate. However, there was no significant difference in reducing mortality or the incidence of colonization. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

Oral Lipid Nanocrystal Amphotericin B for Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B is the gold standard treatment for severe mycoses. A new orally delivered, less-toxic formulation of amphotericin has been developed. METHODS: In our randomized clinical trial, we tested oral lipid nanocrystal (LNC) amphotericin B (MAT2203, Matinas Biopharma) vs intravenous (IV) amphotericin for human immunodeficiency virus-associated cryptococcal meningitis in 4 sequential cohorts. Two pilot cohorts assessed safety and tolerability (n = 10 each), and 2 cohorts assessed efficacy with/without 2 IV loading doses (n = 40 each). The experimental arm received 1.8 g/d oral LNC amphotericin through 2 weeks with 100 mg/kg/d flucytosine, then 1.2 g/d LNC amphotericin through 6 weeks. The randomized control arm (n = 41) received 7 days of IV amphotericin with flucytosine, then 7 days of fluconazole 1200 mg/d. The primary end point was cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) early fungicidal activity (EFA). RESULTS: We randomized 80 participants to oral LNC amphotericin + flucytosine with (n = 40) and without (n = 40) 2 IV loading doses and 41 control participants to IV amphotericin + flucytosine. Mean EFA was 0.40 log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL/d for all-oral LNC amphotericin, 0.42 log10  Cryptococcus CFU/mL/d for oral LNC amphotericin with IV loading doses, and 0.46 log10 CFU/mL/d for IV amphotericin controls. LNC amphotericin groups achieved 2-week CSF sterility in 63% (44 of 70) vs 68% (23 of 34) of controls. The 18-week survival was 85% (34 of 40) with all-oral LNC amphotericin, 90% (36 of 40) with oral LNC amphotericin given IV loading doses, and 85% (35 of 41) with IV amphotericin.Grade 3-4 laboratory adverse events occurred less frequently in LNC amphotericin groups (41%) than the IV amphotericin group (61%, P = .05), particularly for anemia (21% vs 44%; P = .01) and potassium (5% vs 17%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This new oral amphotericin B LNC formulation appears promising for cryptococcal meningitis with antifungal activity, similar survival, and less toxicity than IV amphotericin. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04031833.

Safety and usefulness of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B: Systematic scoping review.

PURPOSE: Invasive fungal infections potentially result in fatal outcomes in immunocompromised hosts. Compared to intravenous administration, a nebulization therapy can achieve a high concentration of drug delivered in the respiratory tract, without a systematic absorption. We herein summarized the study findings on the safety and clinical utility of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B therapy. METHODS: According to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, we performed a search on MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles with relevant keywords, including "inhaled liposomal amphotericin B″, "nebulized liposomal amphotericin B″, or "aerosolized liposomal amphotericin B″, from the inception of these databases to August 31, 2022. RESULTS: Of the 172 articles found, 27 articles, including 13 case reports, 11 observational studies, and 3 clinical trials, were selected. Generally, findings showed that nebulized liposomal amphotericin B treatment appeared to be safe and without severe adverse effects. We found an accumulated evidence for the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis among lung transplantation recipients; however, a randomized controlled study has yet to be reported. Data on hemato-oncological patients are relatively scarce; however, a randomized controlled study suggested the prophylactic effect of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B on invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Observational and randomized controlled studies to evaluate therapeutic efficacy of the nebulized liposomal amphotericin B therapy have not been performed. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found increasing evidence for the effectiveness of the inhalation therapy among patients after lung transplantation and with hemato-oncological diseases.

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion: an effective drug for the treatment of mucormycosis in China.

Objective: Mucormycosis has emerged as an increasingly important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, but the effective drugs for the treatment are limited. Hence, the study aimed to summarize the characteristics of mucormycosis in patients with hematological malignancies, and investigate the efficacy and safety of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion (ABCD) in treating mucormycosis. Methods: In this study, patients with mucormycosis complicated by hematological malignancies who received ABCD at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from April 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data of the enrolled patients were collected, and then, the drug response at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and the end of treatment; the survival rate at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; and the laboratory-related indicators and adverse events (AEs) associated with ABCD were evaluated. Results: In total, 9 patients with mucormycosis complicated by hematological malignancies were enrolled. The main symptoms were fever, cough, and chest pain. In addition, reversed halo signs (RHS) were found on chest CTs. The responses to ABCD at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and the end of treatment were 100% (9/9), 77.8% (7/9), and 77.8% (7/9), respectively. The survival rates of the patients at 4, 8, and 12 weeks were 77.8% (7/9), 66.7% (6/9), and 66.7% (6/9), respectively. Among laboratory-related indicators, white blood cell (WBC) counts were significantly increased from baseline after 1 and 2 weeks of ABCD treatment (P<0.05), whereas neutrophil counts were only increased significantly from baseline at 2 weeks post-treatment (P<0.05). The most common AEs were infusion-related AEs manifesting as fever, chills, and pruritus. Moreover, none of the patients suffered from renal injury once again. Conclusion: ABCD is a promising treatment strategy for patients with mucormycosis complicated by hematologic malignancies, showing remarkable efficacy and safety.

Incidence of acute kidney injury in dogs with systemic mycotic infections treated with amphotericin B (1996-2020).

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin-B (AmB) is an essential medication for the treatment of life-threatening systemic mycoses but the incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after its administration are not known in dogs. OBJECTIVE: Determine the incidence of and risk factors for AKI in dogs receiving AmB. ANIMALS: Fifty-one client owned dogs receiving AmB for the treatment of systemic mycoses. METHODS: Retrospective study. Signalment, potential risk factors, AKI development (creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL from baseline), drug formulation (deoxycholate [AmB-D] or lipid complex [ABLC]), dose, and treatment duration were recorded. The probability of an AKI diagnosis was evaluated using a log-rank test. The incidence of AKI and odds ratios were calculated for potential risk factors. RESULTS: Incidence of AKI was 5/12 (42%) for dogs receiving AmB-D and 14/39 (36%) for dogs receiving ABLC. Of the 19 dogs that developed AKI, 16 (84%) continued treatment after a pause in the planned dosing protocol. Fifty percent of dogs received a cumulative dose of 6.9 mg/kg for AmB-D and 22.5 mg/kg for ABLC (P < .01) at time of AKI diagnosis. ICU hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.87) and inpatient status (OR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.86) were associated with decreased odds of AKI. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Incidence of AKI with AmB is common but does not always preclude continued treatment. The incidence of AKI is similar between AmB-D and ABLC, but dogs receiving ABLC tolerated a higher cumulative total dose before AKI diagnosis.

Nebulized amphotericin B for preventing exacerbations in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is complicated by exacerbations in more than one-third of the subjects. Whether nebulized amphotericin B (NAB) therapy prevents ABPA exacerbations remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the frequency of subjects remaining exacerbation-free, one year after initiating NAB. The key secondary objectives were the time to first exacerbation and the safety of NAB therapy. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies evaluating ≥5 subjects of ABPA managed with NAB. We report the pooled proportion of ABPA subjects remaining exacerbation free after one year. For the randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we estimate the pooled risk difference (RD) of exacerbation-free status at one year with NAB versus the control arm. RESULTS: We included five studies for our analysis; three were observational (n = 28) and two RCTs (n = 160). The pooled proportion (95% confidence interval [CI]) of subjects remaining exacerbation free with NAB at one year was 76% (62-88). The pooled RD (95% CI) of an exacerbation-free status at one year was 0.33 (-0.12 to 0.78) and was not significantly different between the NAB and control arms. The time to first exacerbation was longer with NAB than with the standard therapy. No serious adverse events were reported with NAB. CONCLUSION: NAB does not improve exacerbation-free status at one year; however, weak evidence suggests it delays ABPA exacerbations. More research using different dosing regimens is required.

Treatment of pulmonary mucormycosis with adjunctive nebulized amphotericin B (MUCONAB trial): Results of an open-label randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of nebulized amphotericin B (NAB) in managing pulmonary mucormycosis (PM) is unknown. METHODS: In this open-label trial, we randomized PM subjects to receive either intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (control arm, 3-5 mg/kg/day) alone or along with nebulized amphotericin B deoxycholate (NAB, 10 mg twice a day, every alternate day). The primary outcomes were: (1) overall response ('success' [complete or partial response] or 'failure' [stable disease, progressive disease, or death]) at 6 weeks; and (2) the proportion of subjects with adverse events (AE). The key secondary outcome was 90-day mortality. We performed a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis where we included only subjects receiving at least a single dose of NAB. RESULTS: Fifteen and 17 subjects were randomized to the control and NAB arms; two died before the first dose of NAB. Finally, we included 30 subjects (15 in each arm; mean age 49.8 years; 80% men) for the mITT analysis. Diabetes mellitus (n = 27; 16/27 were COVID-19-associated PM) was the most common predisposing factor. The overall treatment success was not significantly different between the control and the NAB arms (71.4% vs. 53.3%; p = .45). Twenty-nine subjects experienced any AE, but none discontinued treatment. The 90-day mortality was not significantly different between the control (28.6%) and NAB arm (53.3%; p = .26). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive NAB was safe but did not improve overall response at 6 weeks. A different dosing schedule or nebulized liposomal amphotericin B may still need evaluation. More research is needed to explore other treatment options for PM.

Lipid-based amphotericin B gel treatment eradicates vulvovaginal candidiasis in patients who failed to azole therapy.

Vaginal yeast infection is one of the most common diseases caused by vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). Effective therapy for VVC is needed. A lipid-based amphotericin B gel 0.1% (LAB) was developed and evaluated for the treatment of VVC patients and those who failed to azole therapy. LAB was applied topically twice daily for 7 days to 64 moderate patients and 14 days to 55 severely infected VVC patients. Additionally, 66 patients who failed to azole therapy were treated twice daily with LAB for 14 days. A 91.5% clinical response and 93.16% mycological response was observed in VVC patients. The patients treated with LAB who failed to azole therapy showed a 75% clinical, 95.3% mycological response and 83% remission was observed.Overall, the LAB was found to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of VVC patients. Clinical Trial Registration All the trials were registered at Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2013/02/003378, CTRI/2014/02/004409).

Efficacy and safety of echinocandin monotherapy and combination therapy for immunocompromised patients with systemic candidiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic candidiasis is caused by Candida invading the bloodstream. The efficacy and safety of echinocandins in monotherapy and combination therapy regimes have not been adequately compared in immunocompromised patients with Candidiasis, and thus this systematic review aims to do so. METHODS: A protocol was prepared a priori. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically (from inception of each database to September 2022) to identify randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers performed screening, quality assessment of trials, and extracted data independently. Pairwise meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model to compare echinocandin monotherapy versus other antifungals. The primary outcomes of interest were treatment success and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: 547 records (PubMed=310, EMBASE=210 and Cochrane Library=27) were reviewed. Following our screening criteria, six trials involving 177 patients were included. Risk of bias of four included studies had some concerns due to lack of a pre-specified analysis plan. Meta-analysis shows that echinocandin monotherapy does not have significantly higher rates of "treatment success" compared to other classes of antifungals (RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.80-1.56). However, echinocandins appeared to be significantly safer than other forms of antifungal therapy (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.73-0.86). CONCLUSION: Our findings have shown that echinocandin monotherapy (micafungin, caspofungin) given intravenously are just as effective as other antifungals (amphotericin B, itraconazole) in the treatment of systemic candidiasis in immunocompromised patients. There appears to be similar benefits when using echinocandins compared to amphotericin B which has also been used as a broad-spectrum antifungal, while avoiding the severe adverse effects that amphotericin B causes, such as nephrotoxicity.