Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 16(3): e123-36, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25752563

RESUMO

Survivors of childhood cancer treated with anthracycline chemotherapy or chest radiation are at an increased risk of developing congestive heart failure. In this population, congestive heart failure is well recognised as a progressive disorder, with a variable period of asymptomatic cardiomyopathy that precedes signs and symptoms. As a result, several clinical practice guidelines have been developed independently to help with detection and treatment of asymptomatic cardiomyopathy. These guidelines differ with regards to definitions of at-risk populations, surveillance modality and frequency, and recommendations for interventions. Differences between these guidelines could hinder the effective implementation of these recommendations. We report on the results of an international collaboration to harmonise existing cardiomyopathy surveillance recommendations using an evidence-based approach that relied on standardised definitions for outcomes of interest and transparent presentation of the quality of the evidence. The resultant recommendations were graded according to the quality of the evidence and the potential benefit gained from early detection and intervention.


Assuntos
Antraciclinas/efeitos adversos , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Imagem/normas , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Sobreviventes , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Biomarcadores/sangue , Cardiomiopatias/sangue , Cardiomiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Cardiomiopatias/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Consenso , Comportamento Cooperativo , Diagnóstico Precoce , Ecocardiografia/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Lesões por Radiação/sangue , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Angiografia Cintilográfica/normas , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Heart ; 92(7): 963-8, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16775104

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To test whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to assess differential lung blood flow as accurately as isotope lung perfusion studies in patients investigated for congenital heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Radionuclide lung perfusion and MR imaging were performed in 12 children with suspected unilateral branch pulmonary artery stenosis (mean age 12.1 (5.9) years, range 3.1-17.2 years). A non-breath hold, fast gradient echo phase contrast MR sequence was used to measure flow in the pulmonary trunk and one pulmonary artery to calculate differential flow. Good agreement was shown between the two imaging methods by Bland-Altman analysis. There was excellent correlation between the radionuclide and MR phase contrast calculated total lung blood flow (r = 0.98, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MR phase contrast is an accurate method for measuring differential total right and left lung blood flow. If MR imaging is performed to assess the branch pulmonary arteries, differential lung blood flow can be also measured, avoiding the need for an additional radionuclide lung perfusion scan and reducing the overall radiation burden to this group of patients.


Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Artéria Pulmonar , Circulação Pulmonar/fisiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Masculino , Angiografia Cintilográfica/métodos , Angiografia Cintilográfica/normas , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Albumina Sérica , Agregado de Albumina Marcado com Tecnécio Tc 99m , Compostos de Estanho
9.
J Intern Med ; 253(3): 253-62, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12603492

RESUMO

When chest symptoms recur in a patient who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), it is necessary to rule out restenosis (R). Three main noninvasive tests suggest the presence of R: exercise stress test (XT), myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and stress echocardiography (s-echo). The objectives of this review were: (1) to estimate the pretest probability of R as a function of time after PTCA in symptomatic patients and (2) to obtain an approximation of the diagnostic parameters of the XT, MPI and s-echo for detecting R. A MEDLINE search (English-language, years: 1980-2001) was conducted to identify studies examining post-PTCA functional testing for diagnosing R. Data from the studies were pooled. Comparing studies was often difficult due to varying methodology in the studies. Pretest probability of R in symptomatic patients increases in a nonlinear fashion from 20% or less at 1 month, to nearly 90% at 1-year postangioplasty. The approximated accuracy of the XT, MPI, and s-echo for detecting R was 62, 82 and 84%, respectively. During the first month after PTCA, none of the noninvasive modalities is able to accurately detect R. Late (7-9 months) after PTCA, the pretest probability of R is high and therefore the noninvasive measure may be spared. Our analysis suggests that MPI and s-echo should be preferred over the XT for diagnosing R.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Reestenose Coronária/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse/normas , Teste de Esforço/normas , Angiografia Cintilográfica/normas , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
12.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 144(32): 1537-42, 2000 Aug 05.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10949637

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent the 'non-diagnostic' lung scans made because of a clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism enable further determination of the risk of pulmonary embolism. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: All non-diagnostic lung perfusion ventilation scans made in the Academic Medical Centre of Amsterdam in 1997 of 114 patients in succession (55 males and 59 females aged 27-85 years) were subjected to blind and independent re-evaluation by three observers (an experienced nuclear medicine expert, an experienced and an inexperienced intern) who, using a lung segment chart, estimated the risk of embolism as < 25%, 25-50%, 50-75% and > 75%. They did this first without and then with the chest X-ray. The findings were grouped on the basis of accordance or non-accordance with the pulmonary angiogram. The interobserver agreement was calculated by means of kappa statistics. RESULTS: Of 58 patients the lung scan could be compared with a chest X-ray and a pulmonary angiogram. In 43 patients with a normal angiogram the observers in an average of 50% of the scans estimated the risk of pulmonary embolism as < 25%, as against 25-50% in 27%, 50-75% in 9% and > 75% in 5%. In 15 patients with a deviant pulmonary angiogram, these figures were 22%, 38%, 20%, and 12%, respectively. The interobserver kappa for evaluation without chest X-ray was < or = 0.16, as against < or = 0.41% with the chest X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable classification of the risk of pulmonary embolism was not possible on the basis of non-diagnostic lung scans, regardless of whether the patient did or did not have pulmonary embolism. The interobserver variability was less when the lung scan was evaluated together with the chest X-ray, but even so it was unacceptably high.


Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Cintilográfica/normas , Relação Ventilação-Perfusão , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Angiografia Cintilográfica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
15.
Int Angiol ; 8(1): 22-7, 1989.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2671199

RESUMO

Radionuclide angiography (RNA), was compared to contrast phlebography (CP) for evaluation of iliofemoral venous patency. Twenty-three patients that six months earlier had been treated for iliofemoral venous thrombosis were investigated. The reproducibility of RNA was good as the interindividual and intraindividual variation was 80-85% and 90-95% respectively. The sensitivity of RNA was 91% in the iliac and 65% in the femoral segment. The specificity was 78% in the iliac and 74% in the femoral segment. The advantages as compared to CP are: easy performance, easy to repeat, no adverse reactions and visualization of the whole venous system. The disadvantages are: e.g. difficulties in interpretation in bilateral disease or abnormal anatomy. RNA is recommended as a screening method for suspected iliac venous obstruction and for follow-up of venous patency after iliofemoral venous thrombosis.


Assuntos
Veia Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Cintilográfica , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Veia Femoral/fisiologia , Humanos , Veia Ilíaca/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Angiografia Cintilográfica/normas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tromboflebite/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...