Targeting inflammatory pathways in myocardial infarction.

Acute cardiomyocyte necrosis in the infarcted heart generates damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), activating complement and Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)/Interleukin (IL)-1 signalling and triggering an intense inflammatory reaction. Infiltrating leucocytes clear the infarct from dead cells, while activating reparative pathways that lead to formation of a scar. As the infarct heals the ventricle remodels, the geometric, functional and molecular alterations associated with postinfarction remodelling are driven by the inflammatory cascade and are involved in the development of heart failure. Because unrestrained inflammation in the infarcted heart induces matrix degradation and cardiomyocyte apoptosis, timely suppression of the postinfarction inflammatory reaction may be crucial to protect the myocardium from dilative remodelling and progressive dysfunction. Inhibition and resolution of postinfarction inflammation involve mobilization of inhibitory mononuclear cell subsets and require activation of endogenous STOP signals. Our manuscript discusses the basic cellular and molecular events involved in initiation, activation and resolution of the postinfarction inflammatory response, focusing on identification of therapeutic targets. The failure of anti-integrin approaches in patients with myocardial infarction and a growing body of experimental evidence suggest that inflammation may not increase ischaemic cardiomyocyte death, but accentuates matrix degradation causing dilative remodelling. Given the pathophysiologic complexity of postinfarction remodelling, personalized biomarker-based approaches are needed to target patient subpopulations with dysregulated inflammatory and reparative responses. Inhibition of pro-inflammatory signals (such as IL-1 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) may be effective in patients with defective resolution of postinfarction inflammation who exhibit progressive dilative remodelling. In contrast, patients with predominant hypertrophic/fibrotic responses may benefit from anti-TGF strategies.

Recommendations for incorporating biologicals into management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: individualized patient approaches.

Psoriasis is a T-cell mediated skin disease that affects approximately 2% of the population worldwide. Despite the prevalence of the disease and long-standing efforts to develop strategies to treat it, there is a need for safe and effective therapies to treat psoriasis, particularly the more severe forms. Biological agents such as alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab have been recognized as a class of treatment distinct from other forms of therapy in the treatment algorithm of psoriasis. Recent national and international consensus meetings have developed statements that position biological agents as an important addition to the treatment armamentarium for moderate to severe psoriasis, along with phototherapy and traditional systemic agents. There has been consensus that treatment should be individualized to each patient's needs and circumstances. Biological agents offer the hope of safe, effective, long-term management of moderate to severe psoriasis. As new agents receive approval from Health Canada, the available range of therapeutic options for treating this chronic disease will broaden. A Canadian Psoriasis Expert Panel recently convened in February 2005 to analyze, based on a series of clinical case scenarios, the indications, contraindications, and considerations for and against each of the four biological agents, derived from product labelling, where available, and from the efficacy and safety data from phase 3 and earlier clinical trials, as well as post-marketing reports. The Panel has formulated a set of recommendations for incorporating these biological agents into the current treatment paradigm of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and has identified the preferred biological agents for each patient based on individual needs and circumstances.

Extended efalizumab therapy sustains efficacy without increasing toxicity in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Agents that safely provide long-term control of psoriasis are needed. To determine the safety and efficacy of extended efalizumab therapy, 339 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis received 2 mg/kg subcutaneous (SC) efalizumab weekly for 12 weeks. At Week 12, 290 patients who achieved > or =50% Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-50) improvement or a static Physician's Global Assessment grading of "mild," "minimal," or "clear" entered maintenance treatment with weekly SC efalizumab. At Week 12, 82%, 41%, and 13% of 339 patients achieved a PASI-50, PASI-75, and PASI-90 response, respectively. At 15 months, 65%, 50%, and 25% of patients achieved a PASI-50, PASI-75, and PASI-90 response, respectively (intent-to-treat, n = 339). The incidence of adverse events did not increase over time, and no new common adverse events were reported. The majority of patients experienced sustained efficacy with no increase in toxicity. This study is planned to continue; patients will receive up to 36 months of continuous efalizumab.