Citalopram plus low-dose pipamperone versus citalopram plus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder: an 8-week, double-blind, randomized study on magnitude and timing of clinical response.

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors take several weeks to achieve their full antidepressant effects. Post-synaptic 5-HT2A receptor activation is thought to be involved in this delayed therapeutic effect. Pipamperone acts as a highly selective 5-HT2A/D4 antagonist when administered in low doses. The purpose of this study was to compare citalopram 40 mg once daily plus pipamperone 5 mg twice daily (PipCit) versus citalopram plus placebo twice daily for magnitude and onset of therapeutic effect. METHOD: An 8-week, randomized, double-blind study in patients with major depressive disorder was carried out. RESULTS: The study population comprised 165 patients (citalopram and placebo, n=82; PipCit, n=83) with a mean baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 32.6 (s.d.=5.5). In the first 4 weeks, more citalopram and placebo than PipCit patients discontinued treatment (18% v. 4%, respectively, p=0.003). PipCit patients had significantly greater improvement in MADRS score at week 1 [observed cases (OC), p=0.021; last observation carried forward (LOCF), p=0.007] and week 4 (LOCF, p=0.025) but not at week 8 compared with citalopram and placebo patients. Significant differences in MADRS scores favoured PipCit in reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties and pessimistic thoughts. Mean Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores were significantly improved after 1 week of PipCit compared with citalopram and placebo (OC and LOCF, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although the MADRS score from baseline to 8 weeks did not differ between groups, PipCit provided superior antidepressant effects and fewer discontinuations compared with citalopram and placebo during the first 4 weeks of treatment, especially in the first week.

Double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study on the efficacy and safety of oral granisetron and oral ondansetron in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving hyperfractionated total body irradiation.

The efficacy and safety of granisetron and ondansetron for the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting resulting from hyperfractionated total body irradiation (TBI) were assessed. Thirty-four patients randomly received double-blind, oral granisetron (2 mg, 1 h before first daily fraction of radiation) or ondansetron (8 mg, 1.5 h prior to each fraction of TBI). Ninety patients who received the same TBI regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation (BMT), but no 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, were identified and comprised the historical control group. By design, this study was only powered to show a difference between each of the active treatment groups and the historical control group. Significantly more patients given granisetron (33.3%) or ondansetron (26.7%) had zero emetic episodes over 4 days, the primary efficacy end point, than those in the historical control group (0%) (P < 0.01; intent-to-treat). Secondary efficacy end points were also evaluated. During the first 24 h, significantly more patients taking granisetron (61.1%) or ondansetron (46.7%) had zero emetic episodes than patients in the historical control group (6.7%) (P < 0.01). Complete emetic control (no emesis or rescue antiemetic) over 4 days was more frequent in patients taking granisetron (27.8%) or ondansetron (26.7%) compared with the historical control group (0%) (P < 0.01). Significantly fewer patients taking granisetron (18/18), but not those taking ondansetron (12/15), experienced more than five emetic episodes during the 4 days of the study compared with the historical control group (40/90; P < 0.01). Oral granisetron and ondansetron are safe and effective for the prevention of nausea and vomiting resulting from TBI.

Effective emetic control during conditioning of children for bone marrow transplantation using ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist.

Preparation for bone marrow transplantation (BMT) uses the extremely emetogenic combination of chemotherapy and total body irradiation (TBI). Ondansetron is a selective 5-HT3 antagonist and has clear anti-emetic capabilities. The efficacy of the drug was assessed in 15 children (aged 2-17 years) who received high dose cyclophosphamide (on days -6 and -5) and TBI (days -3 to 0 inclusive). During days -6 to -4 when the emetic effect of cyclophosphamide would be most pronounced, 12 of the 15 patients (80%) had fewer than five emetic episodes during their worst 24-h period, 11 (73%) had fewer than three vomits whilst nine (60%) experienced no vomiting or retching. Eleven patients progressed to TBI and 10 (91%) had fewer than five emetic events in the worst 24-h period (days -3 to +2), six (55%) had no vomiting at all. Of 100 evaluable 'patient-days' 83 (83%) were without any vomiting or retching and a further 10 'patient-days' had only one or two emetic episodes. There were no significant side-effects noted and in particular no extrapyramidal reactions. Headaches and constipation, which have been seen in adult studies, were not reported by patient or parent on any of the study days and transient elevation of liver enzymes were noted in only two patients. Ondansetron has a major role in preparing patients for BMT.

Granisetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of radiation induced emesis during total body irradiation.

The antiemetic efficacy of granisetron was tested in an open trial in patients undergoing highly emetogenic treatment by single fraction total body irradiation. Thirty-two consecutive patients were entered. Results were both patient- and observer-rated. Following a single intravenous dose of granisetron 18 patients (56.3%) experienced total protection and a further 13 (40.6%) had major antiemetic protection with four of these patients experiencing nausea only. One patient experienced an anaphylactic reaction on infusion of monoclonal antibody-treated donor marrow 5 h after administration of the trial drug and vomited on multiple occasions. The reaction was associated with hypotension. A further patient experienced transient hypotension secondary to septicaemia 8 h after receiving granisetron. Three patients required a second dose. Headache was the most frequent side-effect occurring in three patients, but in to of these patients the test drug was not thought to be implicated. In conclusion granisetron is a highly effective agent in controlling radiation induced emesis with a favourable toxicity profile.