Accelerating the Throughput of Affinity Mass Spectrometry-Based Ligand Screening toward a G Protein-Coupled Receptor.

Affinity mass spectrometry (MS) enables rapid screening of compound mixtures for ligands bound to a specific protein target, yet its current throughput is limited to individually assay pools of 400-2000 compounds. Typical affinity MS screens implemented in pharmaceutical industry laboratories identify putative ligands based on qualitative analysis of compound binding to the target whereas no quantitative information is acquired to discriminate high- and low-affinity ligands in the screening phase. Furthermore, these screens require purification of a stabilized form of the protein target, which poses a great challenge for membrane receptor targets. Here, we describe a new, potentially general affinity MS strategy that allows screening of 20,000 compounds in one pool for highly efficient ligand discovery toward a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) target. Quantitative measurement of compound binding to the receptor enables high-affinity ligand selection using both the purified receptor and receptor-embedded cell membranes. This high-throughput, label-free and quantitative affinity MS screen resulted in discovery of three new antagonists of the A2A adenosine receptor.

Striatal pre- and postsynaptic profile of adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists.

Striatal adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)Rs) are highly expressed in medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the indirect efferent pathway, where they heteromerize with dopamine D(2) receptors (D(2)Rs). A(2A)Rs are also localized presynaptically in cortico-striatal glutamatergic terminals contacting MSNs of the direct efferent pathway, where they heteromerize with adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)Rs). It has been hypothesized that postsynaptic A(2A)R antagonists should be useful in Parkinson's disease, while presynaptic A(2A)R antagonists could be beneficial in dyskinetic disorders, such as Huntington's disease, obsessive-compulsive disorders and drug addiction. The aim or this work was to determine whether selective A(2A)R antagonists may be subdivided according to a preferential pre- versus postsynaptic mechanism of action. The potency at blocking the motor output and striatal glutamate release induced by cortical electrical stimulation and the potency at inducing locomotor activation were used as in vivo measures of pre- and postsynaptic activities, respectively. SCH-442416 and KW-6002 showed a significant preferential pre- and postsynaptic profile, respectively, while the other tested compounds (MSX-2, SCH-420814, ZM-241385 and SCH-58261) showed no clear preference. Radioligand-binding experiments were performed in cells expressing A(2A)R-D(2)R and A(1)R-A(2A)R heteromers to determine possible differences in the affinity of these compounds for different A(2A)R heteromers. Heteromerization played a key role in the presynaptic profile of SCH-442416, since it bound with much less affinity to A(2A)R when co-expressed with D(2)R than with A(1)R. KW-6002 showed the best relative affinity for A(2A)R co-expressed with D(2)R than co-expressed with A(1)R, which can at least partially explain the postsynaptic profile of this compound. Also, the in vitro pharmacological profile of MSX-2, SCH-420814, ZM-241385 and SCH-58261 was is in accordance with their mixed pre- and postsynaptic profile. On the basis of their preferential pre- versus postsynaptic actions, SCH-442416 and KW-6002 may be used as lead compounds to obtain more effective antidyskinetic and antiparkinsonian compounds, respectively.