Structure-Guided Modification of Heterocyclic Antagonists of the P2Y14 Receptor.

The P2Y14 receptor (P2Y14R) mediates inflammatory activity by activating neutrophil motility, but few classes of antagonists are known. We have explored the structure-activity relationship of a 3-(4-phenyl-1 H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-5-(aryl)benzoic acid antagonist scaffold, assisted by docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation at a P2Y14R homology model. A computational pipeline using the High Throughput MD Python environment guided the analogue design. Selection of candidates was based upon ligand-protein shape and complementarity and the persistence of ligand-protein interactions over time. Predictions of a favorable substitution of a 5-phenyl group with thiophene and an insertion of a three-methylene spacer between the 5-aromatic and alkyl amino moieties were largely consistent with empirical results. The substitution of a key carboxylate group on the core phenyl ring with tetrazole or truncation of the 5-aryl group reduced affinity. The most potent antagonists, using a fluorescent assay, were a primary 3-aminopropyl congener 20 (MRS4458) and phenyl p-carboxamide 30 (MRS4478).

No Effect of SLCO1B1 and CYP3A4/5 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ticagrelor in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects.

Ticagrelor is a direct-acting P2Y12 receptor antagonist. It is rapidly absorbed and partly metabolized to the active metabolite AR-C124910XX by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5. Three genetic loci (SLCO1B1, CYP3A4, and UGT2B7) were reported to affect ticagrelor pharmacokinetics. This study aimed to investigate the possible effects of SLCO1B1 and CYP3A4/5 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in healthy Chinese male volunteers. Eighteen healthy male volunteers who participated in pharmacogenetics study of ticagrelor were genotyped for SLCO1B1 rs113681054, SLCO1B1*5 (rs4149056), CYP3A4*1G (rs2242480), and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746). All subjects received a single 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor and then series blood samples were collected from 0 to 48 h. Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were determined by the high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Inhibition in platelet aggregation (IPA) was assessed and the area under the time-effect curve (AUEC) for the IPA was calculated as pharmacodynamic parameters. No significant difference in ticagrelor pharmacokinetics among genotypes of the two genes was observed. The AUEC did not differ significantly among genotypes of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Our data suggest that common genetic variants in SLCO1B1 and CYP3A4/5 may have no effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in healthy Chinese volunteers.

The discovery and development of prasugrel.

INTRODUCTION: Prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315) is a third-generation thienopyridine, which gained approval by the FDA in 2009 for its use in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. AREAS COVERED: This article focuses on the preclinical profile of prasugrel. Using published preclinical and clinical studies, the authors summarize the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of prasugrel and their distinguishing features in efficacy and safety. EXPERT OPINION: Prasugrel has a more rapid, more potent antiplatelet effect with less interindividual response variability when compared to clopidogrel. Those therapeutic advantages are attributed to features of its chemical structure that favor the metabolic conversion of prasugrel to its active metabolite. However, the increased risk of bleeding has been associated with a greater antiplatelet effect and dosing profile; this is especially the case in those patients who are at a higher risk of bleeding complications. It is therefore important for an optimal dosing strategy of prasugrel to be identified to provide a formulation that has the best balance for efficacy and safety.

Impaired bioavailability and antiplatelet effect of high-dose clopidogrel in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

PURPOSE: Bioavailability of clopidogrel in the form of crushed tablets administered via nasogastric tube (NGT) has not been established in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Therefore, we performed a study comparing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to high loading dose of clopidogrel in critically ill patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography with stent implantation. METHODS: In the NGT group (nine patients, after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanically ventilated, therapeutic hypothermia), clopidogrel was administered in the form of crushed tablets via NGT. Ten patients undergoing elective coronary artery stenting took clopidogrel per os (po) in the form of intact tablets. Pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) before and at 0.5, 1, 6, 12, 24 h after administration of a loading dose of 600 mg. In five patients in each group, antiplatelet effect was measured with thrombelastography (TEG; Platelet Mapping) before and 24 h after administration. RESULTS: The carboxylic acid metabolite of clopidogrel was detected in all patients in the po group. In eight patients, the maximum concentration was measured in the range of 0.5-1 h after the initial dose. In four patients in the of NGT group, the carboxylic acid metabolite of clopidogrel was undetectable and in the remaining patients was significantly delayed (peak values at 12 h). All patients in the po group reached clinically relevant (>50 %) inhibition of thrombocyte adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor after 24 h compared with only two in the NGT group (p = 0.012). There was a close correlation between peak of inactive clopidogrel metabolite plasmatic concentration and inhibition of the ADP receptor (r = 0.79; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The bioavailability of clopidogrel in critically ill patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is significantly impaired compared with stable patients. Therefore, other drugs, preferentially administered intravenously, should be considered.

A phase 1 study of prasugrel in patients with sickle cell disease: pharmacokinetics and effects on ex vivo platelet reactivity.

AIMS: Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist that inhibits ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation. Accordingly, it may be useful in reducing platelet-related ischaemia in sickle cell disease (SCD). Exposure to prasugrel's active metabolite (Pras-AM) and its antiplatelet activity in SCD have not been investigated. METHODS: Thirteen adult patients with SCD and an equal number of matched healthy control subjects were studied before and after 12 days of 5.0 or 7.5 mg day(-1) prasugrel treatment. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), impedance aggregometry (MEA), VerifyNow® P2Y12, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation and Plateletworks. Exposure to Pras-AM was also assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with SCD showed increased platelet reactivity vs. healthy control subjects with VerifyNow (408 vs. 323 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), respectively, P = 0.003) and MEA (106 vs. 77 area under the aggregation curve (AU.min), P = 0.002); lower platelet reactivity index with VASP flow cytometry (59 vs. 79% platelet reactivity index (PRI), P = 0.018); and no significant differences with LTA, VASP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or Plateletworks. Relative to baseline, prasugrel significantly reduced platelet reactivity by all assays in both populations (all P < 0.05). Prasugrel was well tolerated, with no bleeding-related events in patients with SCD. The mean concentration-time profiles of Pras-AM were comparable between healthy subjects and patients with SCD following a single 10 mg prasugrel dose and following the 12th dose of 7.5 or 5 mg prasugrel. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that in response to prasugrel, patients with SCD and healthy subjects have similar degrees of platelet inhibition and exposure to Pras-AM, and provide a basis for further study of prasugrel in patients with SCD.

Mecanismos de acción de los diferentes agentes antiplaquetarios / Mechanisms of action of antiplatelet agents

Las manifestaciones clínicas de la aterosclerosis, tales como los síndromes coronarios agudos, los eventos cerebrovasculares y la enfermedad arterial periférica, son las principales causas de morbimortalidad en el mundo. La activación y la agregación plaquetarias son, en última instancia, la causa de la progresión y las presentaciones clínicas de la enfermedad. Por ello, los antiagregantes plaquetarios son un pilar fundamental del tratamiento farmacológico de estos pacientes. Una amplia variedad de receptores de superficie tipo integrinas, familia rica en leucina, receptores acoplados a proteínas G y receptores de tirosincinasa, así como moléculas intraplaquetarias, desencadenan y regulan el proceso de activación/agregación plaquetaria. Todas estas moléculas son dianas potenciales de fármacos antiplaquetarios destinados a prevenir y tratar la trombosis arterial. A pesar del beneficio clínico obtenido con el ácido acetilsalicílico (inhibidor de la ciclooxigenasa), el clopidogrel (antagonista del receptor del ADP P2Y12) y los antagonistas de la glucoproteína IIb/IIIa (abciximab, eptifibatida, tirofibán, lamifibán) al disminuir significativamente el riesgo de episodios aterotrombóticos, la morbimortalidad residual sigue elevada. Por ello los esfuerzos se centran en la búsqueda de nuevos tratamientos antiplaquetarios a fin de mejorar su efectividad y su seguridad. De hecho, nuevos fármacos están en fase de desarrollo y varios han llegado ya a uso clínico. Entre ellos están los nuevos inhibidores de los receptores P2Y12 (prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor y elinogrel), antagonistas del receptor PAR1 de la trombina (vorapaxar, atopaxar) y moléculas de señalización intraplaquetaria. Esta revisión profundiza en los mecanismos de acción del arsenal antiplaquetario actualmente en uso y las nuevas aproximaciones terapéuticas (AU)

The clinical manifestations of atherosclerotic diseases such as acute coronary syndromes, cerebrovascular events and peripheral arterial disease are major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Platelet activation and aggregation are ultimately responsible for the progression and clinical presentation of the disease and, therefore, antiplatelet agents have become one of the mainstays of pharmacological treatment of these patients. A wide variety of surface receptors such as integrin family receptors, receptors rich in Leucine, protein G linked transmembrane receptor, tyrosine kinase receptors as well as intraplatelet molecules, trigger and regulate platelet activation/aggregation. All these molecules are potential targets for antiplatelet drugs to prevent and treat arterial thrombosis. Despite the overall clinical benefit obtained with aspirin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor), clopidogrel (ADP receptor antagonist P2Y12) and antagonists of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, lamifiban) to significantly reduce the risk of atherothrombotic events, residual morbidity and mortality remain high. Therefore efforts have focused on the search for new antiplatelet treatments to improve their effectiveness and safety. In fact, new drugs are in development and various drugs have already reached clinical use. Among them, new P2Y12 receptor blockers (prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel), antagonists of the PAR1 thrombin receptor (vorapaxar and atopaxar) as well as intraplatelet signaling molecules. This review explores the mechanisms of action of the currently used antiplatelet armamentarium as well as new therapeutic approaches (AU)

Applying the pro-drug approach to afford highly bioavailable antagonists of P2Y(14).

Our series of competitive antagonists against the G-protein coupled receptor P2Y(14) were found to be highly shifted in the presence of serum (>99% protein bound). A binding assay using 2% human serum albumin (HSA) was developed to guide further SAR studies and led to the identification of the zwitterion 2, which is substantially less shifted (18-fold) than our previous lead compound 1 (323-fold). However, as the bioavailability of 2 was low, a library of ester pro-drugs was prepared (7a-7j) and assessed in vitro. The most interesting candidates were then profiled in vivo and led to the identification of the pro-drug 7j, which possesses a substantially improved pharmacokinetic profile.

Optimization of the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic attributes in a 6-azauracil series of P2X7 receptor antagonists leading to the discovery of the clinical candidate CE-224,535.

High throughput screening (HTS) of our compound file provided an attractive lead compound with modest P2X(7) receptor antagonist potency and high selectivity against a panel of receptors and channels, but also with high human plasma protein binding and a predicted short half-life in humans. Multi-parameter optimization was used to address the potency, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties which led to potent P2X(7)R antagonists with good disposition properties. Compound 33 (CE-224,535) was advanced to clinical studies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

The identification of 4,7-disubstituted naphthoic acid derivatives as UDP-competitive antagonists of P2Y14.

A weak, UDP-competitive antagonist of the pyrimidinergic receptor P2RY(14) with a naphthoic acid core was identified through high-throughput screening. Optimization provided compounds with improved potency but poor pharmacokinetics. Acylglucuronidation was determined to be the major route of metabolism. Increasing the electron-withdrawing nature of the substituents markedly reduced glucuronidation and improved the pharmacokinetic profile. Additional optimization led to the identification of compound 38 which is an 8 nM UDP-competitive antagonist of P2Y(14) with a good pharmacokinetic profile.