Uncovering the mechanisms of Zhubi decoction against rheumatoid arthritis through an integrated study of network pharmacology, metabolomics, and intestinal flora.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Zhubi Decoction (ZBD) is a modified formulation derived from the classic traditional Chinese medicine prescription "Er-Xian Decoction" documented in the esteemed "Clinical Manual of Chinese Medical Prescription". While the utilization of ZBD has exhibited promising clinical outcomes in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the precise bioactive chemical constituents and the underlying mechanisms involved in its therapeutic efficacy remain to be comprehensively determined. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to systematically examine ZBD's pharmacological effects and molecular mechanisms for RA alleviation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing the collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rat model, we comprehensively evaluated the anti-rheumatoid arthritis effects of ZBD in vivo through various indices, such as paw edema, arthritis index, ankle diameter, inflammatory cytokine levels, pathological conditions, and micro-CT analysis. The UPLC-MS/MS technique was utilized to analyze the compounds of ZBD. The potential therapeutic targets and signaling pathways of ZBD in the management of RA were predicted using network pharmacology. To analyze comprehensive metabolic profiles and identify underlying metabolic pathways, we conducted a serum-based widely targeted metabolomics analysis utilizing LC-MS technology. Key targets and predicted pathways were further validated using immunofluorescent staining, which integrated findings from serum metabolomics and network pharmacology analysis. Additionally, we analyzed the gut microbiota composition in rats employing 16 S rDNA sequencing and investigated the effects of ZBD on the microbiota of CIA rats through bioinformatics and statistical methods. RESULTS: ZBD exhibited remarkable efficacy in alleviating RA symptoms in CIA rats without notable side effects. This included reduced paw redness and swelling, minimized joint damage, improved the histopathology of cartilage and synovium, mitigated the inflammatory state, and lowered serum concentrations of cytokines TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6. Notably, the effectiveness of ZBD was comparable to MTX. Network pharmacology analysis revealed inflammation and immunity-related signaling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT, MAPK, IL-17, and TNF signaling pathways, as vital mediators in the effectual mechanisms of ZBD. Immunofluorescence analysis validated ZBD's ability to inhibit PI3K/AKT pathway proteins. Serum metabolomics studies revealed that ZBD modulates 170 differential metabolites, partially restored disrupted metabolic profiles in CIA rats. With a notable impact on amino acids and their metabolites, and lipids and lipid-like molecules. Integrated analysis of metabolomics and network pharmacology identified 6 pivotal metabolite pathways and 3 crucial targets: PTGS2, GSTP1, and ALDH2. Additionally, 16 S rDNA sequencing illuminated that ZBD mitigated gut microbiota dysbiosis in the CIA group, highlighting key genera such as Ligilactobacillus, Prevotella_9, unclassified_Bacilli, and unclassified_rumen_bacterium_JW32. Correlation analysis disclosed a significant link between 47 distinct metabolites and specific bacterial species. CONCLUSION: ZBD is a safe and efficacious TCM formulation, demonstrates efficacy in treating RA through its multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway mechanisms. The regulation of inflammation and immunity-related signaling pathways constitutes a crucial mechanism of ZBD's efficacy. Furthermore, ZBD modulates host metabolism and intestinal flora. The integrated analysis presents experimental evidence of ZBD for the management of RA.

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate plus hydroxychloroquine combination therapy vs. methotrexate monotherapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) vs. MTX monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Sixty patients without prior RA treatments were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: one receiving MTX plus HCQ, and the other receiving MTX monotherapy. We conducted a comparative analysis before and after the 12-week trial, evaluating the visual analogue scale (VAS), the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS), serum inflammatory factor (including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), as well as the outcome of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for all the participants in the study. RESULTS: At the 12th week of the trial, a more remarkable decrease in pain score (VAS), disease activity score (DAS), and serum inflammatory factor levels could be noticed in individuals on the combination therapy. The quality of life score was as well found to be higher in the MTX + HCQ group than the MTX monotherapy group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the MTX + HCQ and the MTX monotherapy groups were 10.00% and 6.67%, respectively. However, no statistical significance could be observed (p > .05). CONCLUSION: In our study, both the MTX + HCQ combination therapy and MTX monotherapy demonstrated improvements in symptoms, conditions and quality of life for patients with RA. Notably, the combination therapy could achieve better outcomes across all indices compared to MTX monotherapy, highlighting its potential as the optimal first-line treatment for RA. © 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Persistence of power Doppler ultrasonography-detected synovitis over 1 year of follow-up predicts poor prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: the SONORE prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the progression of ultrasonography-detected synovitis in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission during 1 year of follow-up (2) to evaluate the ability of consecutive examinations of ultrasonography to predict relapse (R) or radiographic progression (RP) at 1 year. METHODS: Patients with RA (2010 American College of Rheumatology-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria) in clinical remission (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)<2.6 without clinically active synovitis) were included. An independent investigator performed ultrasonography every 3 months for 1 year. Ultrasonography-detected synovitis was defined as power Doppler-positive ultrasonography synovitis (PDUS) grade ≥1 in at least one joint. PDUS at ≥2 consecutive visits during the follow-up defined persistent PDUS. An increase of ≥1 point in the modified total Sharp score defined RP. An increase in DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP)>0.6 or DAS28-CRP>3.2 and any modification of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or glucocorticoids defined relapse. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with R/RP at 1 year. RESULTS: PDUS was detected in 75 (65.2%), 66, 60, 46 and 29 of the 115 patients with RA at baseline and at months 3, 6, 9 and 12, respectively. 58 (50.4%) patients exhibited persistent PDUS. After 1 year, 22/85 (25.9%) experienced relapse and 12 (14.1%) showed RP. On multivariate analysis, factors predicting R/RP at 1 year were persistent PDUS (HR=2.98, p=0.014) and an increase in DAS28-CRP level at the visit before relapse (HR=4.36, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Persistent PDUS during follow-up, rather than at baseline, predicted worse outcome at 1 year and requires careful monitoring.

Real-world treatment patterns in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: associations with comorbidities and damage.

OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment patterns and the association between long-term glucocorticoid (GC) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use and damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A retrospective study including patients with SLE using the computerised database of a large health maintenance organisation. Patients were matched with subjects from the general population. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between GC cumulative daily doses, HCQ and comorbidities: Osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, smoking, disease duration and HCQ use. RESULTS: A total of 1073 patients with SLE were included, 87.79% were women. The age at first diagnosis was 37.23±14.36 and the SLE disease duration was 12.89±6.23 years. Initiation of HCQ within 12 months of SLE diagnosis increased from 51.02% in 2000 to 83.67% in 2010 and 93.02% in 2018. The annual usage of GC gradually decreased from 45.34% in 2000 to 30.76% in 2020. CVD and osteoporosis were more prevalent in SLE than in the general population. Multivariable logistic regression models revealed increased odds for comorbidities in patients receiving a mean daily dose of prednisone of more than 5 mg/day compared with those receiving 5 mg/day or less. CONCLUSIONS: CVD and osteoporosis were more prevalent in SLE than in the general population. The dose and frequency of GC treatment in patients with SLE have decreased over the years. Prednisone usage in doses exceeding 5 mg/day is associated with significantly increased odds of osteoporosis and CVD.

Development of a questionnaire to assess the patient perspective regarding challenges in psoriatic arthritis treatment-a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment in lower-income regions, particularly from the patient perspective. This study explores the challenges faced by socioeconomically vulnerable PsA patients and the reasons for non-adherence to treatment guidelines. The main objective of the study is to develop a questionnaire to identify the primary challenges in PsA treatment adherence and to analyze its feasibility while simultaneously understanding the target population's unique characteristics. METHODS: We included PsA patients meeting the Classification Criteria for PsA (CASPAR), excluding those with other overlapping inflammatory diseases. The study, supported by two patient-research partners, began with focus groups to identify treatment challenges, leading to the creation of a 26-item questionnaire. Its reliability was verified using the test-retest method, targeting a percent agreement ≥ 0.8. Then, PsA patients at a rheumatology clinic completed the final survey. RESULTS: The study involved 69 PsA patients. The final questionnaire contained 26-questions across five-domains, with a 92.2% agreement rate and an average completion time of 8.3 minutes. Diagnostic delays exceeded a year for 59% of patients and more than two years for 33%. Daily life disruptions affected 43.2% of patients, with 35.3% taking sick leave or retiring. Around 25% waited over 8 weeks for drug approval, and 17.6% required legal intervention to access medication. Drug dispensation issues impacted about 60% of patients. Furthermore, 66.7% lived far from their rheumatologist, with 49% traveling over an hour for appointments. Approximately 30% were unaware of the risks of methotrexatein relation to alcohol consumption and pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire was feasible and reliable, with its results underscoring patient-centric challenges in PsA management, particularly concerning diagnostic delays and medication access, as well as daily life disruptions and misinformation. These findings emphasize the urgency for healthcare reforms aimed at improving diagnosis efficiency, patient education, and streamlined medication access, emphasizing the need for tailored initiatives to improve the healthcare experience for PsA patients.

>Efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of granulomatous mastitis: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is an inflammatory breast disorder of unknown etiology. This benign condition can mimic the clinical presentation of breast cancer and is characterized by symptoms such as breast pain, erythema, and swelling. Over the past few years, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) have been increasingly used to manage this condition. However, strong evidence to support their use is lacking. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence and evaluate the efficacy of DMARDs in the management of IGM. METHODS: A systematic literature review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, directory of open access journals (DOAJ) and Cochrane Library from their inception until May 2024. We included retrospective and prospective studies while excluding case reports and case series of less than 10 patients. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met our eligibility criteria. Fifteen studies were retrospective, while 2 were prospective. No randomized controlled trials were identified. Of these, 16 papers examined the effect of methotrexate on IGM, revealing significant disease improvement in most cases. Several of the studies indicated that patients treated with azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil also achieved favorable responses. CONCLUSION: Given the rarity of IGM, only a limited number of studies have explored the use of DMARDs as a pharmacological treatment option. A significant barrier to advancing our understanding is the substantial heterogeneity in the quality and volume of data provided by these studies. Therefore, there is a need for well-designed, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to rigorously assess the efficacy of DMARDs in the treatment of IGM.

Pain catastrophizing negatively impacts drug retention rate in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and axial Spondyloarthritis: results from a 2-years perspective multicenter GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica) study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain and inflammation are common features of rheumatic conditions such as Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA), often needing prolonged medication treatment for effective management. Maintaining drug retention is essential for both achieving disease control and improving patients' quality of life. This study investigates the influence of pain catastrophizing, a psychological response to pain, on the drug retention rates of PsA and axSpA patients. METHODS: A two-year prospective multicenter observational study involved 135 PsA and 71 axSpA patients. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was employed to assess pain catastrophizing. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were utilized to identify factors associated with drug retention. RESULTS: In the PsA group, patients early discontinuing therapy showed higher baseline disease activity as well as higher incidence of comorbid fibromyalgia. Notably, pain catastrophizing, specifically the domains of Helplessness, Magnification, and Rumination, were significantly elevated in PsA patients who interrupted the treatment. Multivariable analysis confirmed pain catastrophizing as an independent predictor of drug suspension within two years. In axSpA, drug discontinuation was associated with female gender, shorter disease duration, higher baseline disease activity as well as elevated levels of pain catastrophizing. Univariable analysis supported the role of pain catastrophizing, including its domains, as predictors of treatment interruption. However, limited events in axSpA patients precluded a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This prospective study emphasizes the impact of pain catastrophizing on drug retention in patients with PsA and axSpA.

Comparative early effectiveness across 14 PsA drugs and 5 classes of PsA treatment: 3-month results from the PRO-SPIRIT study.

BACKGROUND: The psoriatic arthritis (PsA) Observational Study of Persistence of Treatment (PRO-SPIRIT) assesses effectiveness and persistence of real-world PsA treatments. Ixekizumab (IXE) is an interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor (i) (IL-17Ai), approved for the treatment of adult PsA. METHODS: The aim of this predefined interim analysis was to report baseline characteristics along with early (3-month) descriptive and comparative real-world effectiveness in patients with PsA prescribed with advanced treatment including IL-17Ai; IXE or secukinumab (SEC), IL-12/23i, IL-23i, tumour necrosis factor (TNFi) or Janus kinase (JAKi). RESULTS: 1192 patients across 6 countries were analysed. At baseline, patients receiving IXE had longer disease duration and higher previous biological/targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs experience than patients starting TNFi and SEC 150, and less concomitant conventional-synthetic DMARD use than TNFi and JAKi. Comparative analyses at 3 months showed that: (a) versus TNFi, IXE exhibited similar improvement in clinical Disease Activity in PsA (cDAPSA) but significantly greater improvement in body surface area affected by psoriasis (BSA) and global assessments (physician GA, patient GA (PatGA)); (b) versus IL-12/23i and IL-23i (pooled), IXE showed significantly greater improvement in cDAPSA and PatGA; (c) IXE was as fast as JAKi in improving joint disease activity. Ad hoc analysis indicated that more patients with active psoriasis (BSA ≥3%) achieved minimal disease activity with IXE than JAKi or IL-12/23i. The responses to SEC varied by dosage. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the rapid 3-month effectiveness of IXE on joint disease activity-as fast as TNFi and JAKi (cDAPSA), and exceeding IL-12/23i and IL-23i-along with clear benefits to skin.

Bimekizumab provided rapid improvements in patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: pooled 16-week results from two phase 3 studies.

OBJECTIVES: To assess impact of bimekizumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), using 16-week data from two phase 3 studies. METHODS: BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; tumour necrosis factor inhibitor inadequate response/intolerance (TNFi-IR)) are phase 3 studies of subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W; both were double-blind and placebo-controlled to 16 weeks. Patients were randomised 3:2:1 to bimekizumab, placebo or reference (subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg Q2W) in BE OPTIMAL; 2:1 to bimekizumab or placebo in BE COMPLETE. Patient-reported outcomes for pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL are reported to week 16 using pooled and individual study data for bimekizumab and placebo patients. RESULTS: 1073/1112 (96.5%) patients completed week 16 (bimekizumab:| 677/698 [97.0%]; placebo: 396/414 [95.7%]). Bimekizumab-treated patients achieved rapid improvements vs placebo in pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL by week 4, after a single dose. Improvements continued to week 16 for all patient-reported outcomes, including Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; mean (95% CI) change from baseline: bimekizumab: -|25.2 [-27.2, -23.1]; placebo:| -|5.7 [-8.2, -3.3]) and FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 4.5 [3.9, 5.1]; placebo: 1.1 [0.3, 2.0]); both nominal p<0.001. Greater proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported symptoms vs placebo, including FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 53.1%; placebo: 36.3%) and HAQ-DI (bimekizumab:| 53.0%; placebo: 28.7%); both nominal p<0.001. CONCLUSION: Bimekizumab treatment demonstrated rapid and greater improvements in patient-reported pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL to week 16 vs placebo in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03895203; NCT03896581.

Factors Associated With Successful Withdrawal of Biologic Agents in Children With Colchicine-Resistant Familial Mediterranean Fever.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease, and colchicine is the mainstay of treatment. Approximately 5%-10% of patients may respond inadequately to colchicine, and anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) agents are important treatment options in these patients. The aim of this study was to see whether there is any factor associated with the withdrawal of these anti-IL-1 agents and to investigate the characteristics of colchicine-resistant FMF patients who needed biological therapy. METHODS: Demographic, clinical characteristics, and disease severity of patients, at 2 referral centers, between 2012 and 2022, in whom anti-IL-1 treatment was continued and discontinued, were compared in this study. The international severity scoring system for FMF (ISSF) was used for disease severity assessment. RESULTS: In 64 colchicine-resistant FMF patients, the median (interquartile range) duration of biological treatment was 39 (45) months. Treatment of 26 patients (40.6%) was started with anakinra and 38 (59.4%) with canakinumab. During follow-up, anti-IL-1 treatment was discontinued in 23 patients (35.9%). High ISSF scores before biological treatment, presence of exertional leg pain, subclinical inflammation, and comorbidities were found to be statistically more frequent in the group whose biological therapy could not be discontinued ( p = 0.009, p = 0.006, p = 0.026, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low ISSF scores before biological treatment with no accompanying exertional leg pain, subclinical inflammation, and comorbidities may be stated as an associated factors in terms of the discontinuation of biological agents in colchicine-resistant pediatric FMF patients.

Current practice, trends and attitudes of rheumatologists towards glucocorticoids use for rheumatoid arthritis (GURANTEE): a national cross-sectional survey across China.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate current practices, changes, and perceptions of rheumatologists regarding GC use in RA patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire between April and August 2023. Rheumatologists from 31 province-level regions of Mainland China were invited to participate. Chi-squared tests were adopted to investigate the differences by sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: 1,717 rheumatologists from 598 hospitals completed the survey with a response rate of 92%. Up to 60% of participants expressed currently infrequent initiation of GC co-therapy with csDMARDs (hardly ever 7.0%; occasionally 24.6%; sometimes 29.1%), accompanied by a decline of frequency over time reported in 64.2%. Regarding attitudes towards bridging therapy with GC, 604 (35.2%) participants supported this approach, 468 (27.3%) opposed it, and 645 (37.6%) remained inconclusive. Time to GC discontinuation in context of csDMARDs was commonly reported within 6 months in current practice which has been narrowed over time. Reasons for chronic GC use were mostly reported due to suboptimal disease control, followed by the need of RA complications, and pre-existing comorbidities. After failure of GC cessation, majority of respondents (84.4%) would escalate RA therapy (commonly by addition of JAK inhibitors, TNF inhibitors), which usually or often facilitated the GC cessation. The most frequently reported advantages and weaknesses of GC were rapid and strong efficacy, adverse events, respectively. Regarding long-term low-dose GC use for RA, the percentage of respondents who supported, opposed, or depended on the situation were 15.9%, 17.2%, and 66.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current data demonstrate that GC initiation for RA treatment is not as frequent as before and the awareness of GC discontinuation is growing in current practice. Attitudes towards GC co-therapy with csDMARDs vary considerably and long-term low-dose GC use remain situation dependent.

Truth unveiled by time and the marbled definition of D2T-RA: retrospective analysis on the persistence of the difficult-to-treat status among refractory RA patients.

BACKGROUND: The current EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T-RA) identifies patients with active disease refractory to multiple treatments at a single time point, without considering the persistence of this condition over time. The study aimed to assess difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T-RA) over 12 months, considering persistence over time rather than a single time point, in a real-life cohort. METHODS: In a single-center real-life cohort, demographic and clinic data were cross-sectionally collected for each patient at baseline and retrospectively over the previous 12 months bimonthly. For each timepoint, the prevalence of D2T-RA patients was calculated, and patients meeting the EULAR definition for at least 6 months were defined as persistent D2T-RA (pD2T-RA). Finally, the clinical characteristics associated with the time-based definition of pD2T-RA were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 610 adult RA patients, 104 were refractory to ≥ 2 treatments. Initially, 41.3% met D2T-RA criteria, but only 27.9% fulfilled persistent D2T-RA (pD2T-RA) criteria over 6 months. The pD2T-RA group was associated with male gender, higher HAQ and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, more failed treatments, and use of non-NSAID analgesics. Logistic regression linked pD2T-RA to higher SDAI and CRP values, and the use of glucocorticoids or analgesics. Chronic use of glucocorticoids was strongly associated with pD2T-RA. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a temporal criterion allowed for the selection of a subgroup of pD2T-RA patients who differ from those who meet the definition of D2T-RA only episodically. Chronic use of glucocorticoids was the factor most strongly associated with pD2T-RA status.

Rotation or change of biotherapy after TNF blocker treatment failure for axial spondyloarthritis: the ROC-SpA study, a randomised controlled study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by inflammatory low back pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as a first treatment in axSpA. In case of inadequate response to NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) should be introduced according to the recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology. Until 2015, only bDMARD was recommended for axSpA in case of failure to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF). The 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendation proposed to start an alternative bDMARD but without advocating a switch in mode of action as proposed in rheumatoid arthritis. Since 2015, the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-17 has demonstrated efficacy in axSpA. Then, we designed a randomised multicentre clinical trial to identify the more effective treatment after a first anti-TNF failure in axSpA, comparing an anti-IL-17 to a second anti-TNF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ROC-SpA (Rotation Or Change of biotherapy after first anti-TNF treatment failure in axSpA patients) study is a prospective, randomised, multicentre, superiority open-label phase IV trial comparing an anti-IL-17 strategy (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to a second TNF blocker in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with an active axSpA (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index >4 or ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) >3.5) with inadequate 3 months response to a first anti-TNF and with a stable dose of conventional synthetic DMARDs, oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs for at least 1 month are included in 31 hospital centres in France and Monaco. The primary outcome is the ASAS40 response at week 24. The secondary outcomes are ASAS40 at weeks 12 and 52, other clinical scores (ASAS20, partial remission rate, ASDAS major improvement rate) at weeks 12, 24 and 52 with the drugs and anti-drugs concentrations at baseline, weeks 12, 24 and 52. The primary analysis is performed at the end of the study according to the intent-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the committee for the protection of persons (Comité de protection des personnes Ouest IV #12/18_1, 6 February 2018) and registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and in EudraCT. Results of this study, whether positive or negative, will be presented at national and international congresses, to national axSpA patient associations and published in a peer-reviewed journal. It could also impact the international recommendation to manage patients with axSpA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03445845 and EudraCT2017-004700-22.

Janus kinase inhibitors versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analytical comparison of efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation leading to progressively worse disability. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are pivotal in RA treatment, yet their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. AIM: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors and TNF inhibitors in treating RA using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A meta-analysis and outcomes analysis were based on results of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Patient Global Assessment Scale (PtGA) and other indices as incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancy. RESULTS: The JAK inhibitors caused a statistically significant improvement in the HAQ-DI score [MD = 0.08, 95% CI (0.03, 0.12), p = 0.0008] compared with the TNF inhibitors. However, no significant difference was observed between the two drug classes in the CDAI score [MD = - 2.03, 95% CI (- 9.27, 5.22), p = 0.58]. JAK inhibitors were associated with an increase in the VAS score [MD = 3.62, 95% CI (0.86, 6.38), p = 0.01], but there was no significant difference in the PtGA score [MD = 1.91, 95% CI (- 3.25, 7.08), p = 0.47]. CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors demonstrated superior efficacy in improving the functional status and reducing the disease activity in RA patients compared with TNF inhibitors. Both drug classes exhibited comparable safety profiles for VTE and malignancies, though JAK inhibitors had a higher risk for thromboembolism.

The prevalence and clinical features of leflunomide-associated peripheral neuropathy in patients with rheumatic disease in a New Zealand cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence and clinical features of leflunomide-associated peripheral neuropathy in patients with rheumatic disease over a 42-month observational period between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using regional prescription data identifying all patients treated with leflunomide for rheumatic diseases in the Southern District Health Board of New Zealand. Medical records were used to identify patients who developed peripheral neuropathy while receiving treatment with leflunomide. Demographic characteristics, co-therapies, and additional risk factors for peripheral neuropathy were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were identified as receiving leflunomide for the treatment of rheumatic during the study period. In total, 23 patients developed leflunomide-induced peripheral neuropathy within the cohort giving a prevalence of 4.7%. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) performed in 18 (78.2%) of these patients confirmed a distal axonal, sensory, or sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. The majority of patients (n = 22; 95.6%) either improved, stabilized, or resolved on cessation of the drug, with or without medication washout. Adverse symptoms were reported in association with peripheral neuropathy in 15 of the 23 patients (65.2%): these included pain, poor sleep, compromised skin integrity, poor balance, and a Charcot-like arthropathy. Additional treatment was required to manage symptoms of peripheral neuropathy including nine patients (39%) who received pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the previously reported association between leflunomide treatment and the development of a peripheral neuropathy. However, our findings suggest that this is more common than the previous estimates. In patients with psoriatic arthritis and previous tarsitis, there appeared to be an association with a Charcot's-like arthropathy, a complication not previously noted in the literature.

Case report: Breaking CNS immuno-privilege: TNFα-inhibitor triggers aseptic meningitis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

Blood-brain barrier dysfunction might be driven by peripheral inflammation. TNFα inhibitors (TNF-αi) are occasionally associated with a wide spectrum of neurological immuno-mediated disorders. However, patients with systemic autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), might be prone to develop further organ-specific, including central nervous system (CNS), autoimmunity. Here we report the case of a patient, affected by RA and treated with etanercept, who suddenly developed focal neurological symptoms. Cerebrospinal fluid, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI findings are reported and support the diagnosis of TNF-αi -associated aseptic meningitis.

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial to compare BAT1806/BIIB800, a tocilizumab biosimilar, with tocilizumab reference product in participants with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate: treatment period 2 analysis (week 24 to week 48).

BACKGROUND: Equivalent efficacy and comparable pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of the biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 and reference tocilizumab (TCZ) in participants with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported up to week 24 (treatment period [TP] 1) of the phase 3 study. Here we present results for TP2 (study weeks 24-48). METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, multiregional, double-blind, active-controlled, equivalence study, participants with active RA despite methotrexate were randomized (1:1:2) to intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg TCZ every 4 weeks to week 48 (TCZ group), or TCZ to week 24 followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800 group), or BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (BAT1806/BIIB800 group). Efficacy in TP2 was evaluated using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR20/50/70) and change from baseline in Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28). Pharmacokinetics (trough levels), safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 621 randomized participants, 577 (92.9%) completed TP1 and entered TP2 (TCZ: N = 145 [93.5%]; TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800: N = 142 [92.2%]; BAT1806/BIIB800: N = 290 [92.9%]). Proportions of ACR20 responders were similar between treatment groups throughout TP2 (87.8%, 90.3%, and 90.4%, respectively, at week 48), as were proportions of ACR50 and ACR70 responders, and reduction in DAS28. Drug trough levels and antidrug antibody incidences were comparable between the treatment groups. Adverse events were balanced across the treatment groups and no fatal events were reported. CONCLUSION: In TP2, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between the TCZ, TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800, and BAT1806/BIIB800 groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03830203 and EudraCT 2018-002202-31.