Disparities in Ultrasound Use for Diagnosing Pediatric Appendicitis Across United States Emergency Departments.

INTRODUCTION: An ultrasound (US)-first approach for evaluating appendicitis is recommended by the American College of Radiology. We sought to assess the access to and utilization of an US-first approach for children with acute appendicitis in United States Emergency Departments. METHODS: Utilizing the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients <18 y with a primary diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on International Classification of Disease 10th Edition Diagnosis codes. Our primary outcome was the presentation to a hospital that does not perform US for children with acute appendicitis. Our secondary outcome was the receipt of a US at US-capable hospital. We developed generalized linear models with inverse-probability weighting to determine the association between patient characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 49,703 total children, 24,102 (48%) received a US evaluation. The odds of presenting at a hospital with no US use were significantly higher for patients aged 11-17 compared to patients <6 y (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.59, [1.19- 2.13], P = 0.002); lowest median household income quartile compared to highest (aOR [95% CI]: 2.50, [1.52-4.10], P < 0.001); rural locations compared to metropolitan (aOR [95% CI]: 8.36 [5.54-12.6], P < 0.001), and Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic White (aOR [95% CI]: 0.63 [0.45-0.90], P = 0.01). The odds of receiving a US at US-capable hospitals were significantly lower for patients >6 y, lowest median household income quartiles, and rural locations (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rural, older, and poorer children are more likely to present to hospitals that do not utilize US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and are less likely to undergo US at US-capable hospitals.

Economic Trends of Racial Disparities in Pediatric Postappendectomy Complications.

BACKGROUND: Despite unparalleled advances in perioperative medicine, surgical outcomes remain poor for racial minority patients relative to their white counterparts. Little is known about the excess costs to the health care system related to these disparities. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2001 and 2018. We included children younger than 18 years admitted with appendicitis who underwent an appendectomy during their hospital stay. We examined the inflation-adjusted hospital costs attributable to the racial disparities in surgical complications and perforation status, focusing on differences between non-Hispanic white patients and non-Hispanic Black patients. RESULTS: We included 100 639 children who underwent appendectomy, of whom 89.9% were non-Hispanic white and 10.1% were non-Hispanic Black. Irrespective of perforation status at presentation, surgical complications were consistently higher for Black compared with white children, with no evidence of narrowing of the racial disparity gap over time. Black children consistently incurred higher hospital costs (median difference: $629 [95% confidence interval: $500-$758; P < .01). The total inflation-adjusted hospital costs for Black children were $518 658 984, and $59 372 044 (11.41%) represented the excess because of the racial disparities in perforation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although all patients had a progressive decline in post appendectomy complications, Black children consistently had higher rates of complications and perforation, imposing a significant economic burden. We provide an empirical economic argument for sustained efforts to reduce racial disparities in pediatric surgical outcomes, notwithstanding that eliminating these disparities is simply the right thing to do.

Children with appendicitis on the US-Mexico border have socioeconomic challenges and are best served by a freestanding children's hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The US-Mexico border is medically underserved. Recent political changes may render this population even more vulnerable. We hypothesized that children on the border present with high rates of perforated appendicitis due to socioeconomic barriers. METHODS: A prospective survey was administered to children presenting with appendicitis in El Paso, Texas. Primary outcomes were rate of perforation and reason for diagnostic delay. We evaluated the association between demographics, potential barriers to care, risk of perforation and risk of misdiagnosis using logistic regression. p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 98 patients participated from October 2016 to February 2017. 96 patients (98%) were Hispanic and 81 (82%) had Medicaid or were uninsured. 11 patients (11%) resided in Mexico or Guatemala. Patients were less likely to receive a CT and more likely to receive an ultrasound if they presented to a freestanding children's hospital (p = 0.01). 37 patients (38%) presented with perforation, of which 19 (52%) were the result of practitioner misdiagnosis. Patients who presented to a freestanding children's hospital were less likely to be misdiagnosed than patients presenting to other facilities (p = 0.05). Children who underwent surgery in a freestanding children's hospital had the shortest length of stay after adjusting for perforation status and potential confounders (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Children with low socioeconomic status did not have difficulty accessing care on the USA-Mexico border, but they were commonly misdiagnosed. Children were less likely to receive a CT, more likely to be correctly diagnosed and length of stay was shorter when patients presented to a freestanding children's hospital.

Effect of patient and nurse ethnicity on emergency department analgesia for children with appendicitis in israeli government hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Ethnicity is a risk factor for disparate Emergency Department (ED) analgesia. We aimed to explore ethnic variations in the administration of ED analgesia to children with acute appendicitis in Israeli government hospitals. METHODS: Children discharged with an International Classification of Disease-Ninth Revision diagnosis of acute appendicitis between 2010 and 2015 were included. The association between patient ethnicity (Jewish, Arab) and analgesia administration (any, opioid) was assessed. Age, gender, triage category, pain score and time of arrival were tested as possible confounders. The effect of patient-nurse ethnic discordance (PNED) was examined. RESULTS: Overall, 4714 children with acute appendicitis, 3520 Jewish and 1194 Arab, were cared for in the EDs; 1516 (32.2%) received any analgesia and 368 (7.8%) opioid analgesia. Stratified by pain score, no statistical differences were found in the administration of any or opioid analgesia between Jewish and Arab patients with either severe pain or moderate pain. In multivariate modelling adjusted for pain score and triage category, the rates of any analgesia for Arab and Jewish patients were 31.8% (95% CI, 30.9-32.6) and 36.5% (95% CI, 36.0-36.9), adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.38), respectively. The rates of opioid analgesia for Arab and Jewish patients were 8.5% (95% CI, 8.2-8.9) and 7.9% (95% CI, 7.3-8.7), aOR = 0.77; (95% CI, 0.59-1.22), respectively. Jewish and Arab nurses treated proportionally fewer patients from the opposite ethnicity with any analgesia (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Emergency Department analgesia was markedly low, and not associated with patient ethnicity. PNED was associated with decreased rates of analgesia. SIGNIFICANCE: Emergency Department analgesia for children with acute appendicitis in Israeli government hospitals is markedly low. Patient-provider ethnic discordance may negatively influence the provision of analgesia. Significant efforts should be undertaken in order to increase analgesia provision rates and reduce social inequality.

Differences in the Management of Perforated Appendicitis in Children by Race and Insurance Status.

This study was conducted to assess whether race and socioeconomic status influence the management method used to treat pediatric perforated appendicitis. Nonelective pediatric admissions with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis were analyzed using data from the 2001-2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the association between race, insurance status, median household income, rural/metropolitan location, and the risk adjusted odds of undergoing surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy, percutaneous drainage, or neither surgery nor percutaneous drainage. A total of 46,211 admissions of perforated appendicitis were identified. Surgery was performed in 90.5 per cent of them. Black children were less likely to have surgery [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.53] and more likely to be managed nonsurgically with percutaneous drainage (AOR = 1.79). Self-pay patients were less likely to have laparoscopic surgery (AOR = 0.80). Children from rural counties were more likely to undergo surgery than those from larger metropolitan areas (AOR = 1.30). Higher estimated household income did not predict the method of treatment. Although previous studies have attributed racial disparities in outcomes for appendicitis to different rates of perforation and access to care, these findings demonstrate significantly dissimilar management strategies for patients presenting with a similar disease process.

Emergency Department Pain Management in Children With Appendicitis in a Biethnic Population.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to examine factors associated with the administration of emergency department analgesia (any analgesia, opioid analgesia) in patients with acute appendicitis in a tertiary children's hospital in Israel, and to examine ethnic differences. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of children evaluated in the emergency department, who had International Classification Of Disease-Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Regression analysis was used to test the effect of multiple variables on the provision of analgesia. Medications were administered according to a nurse-driven pain protocol. Multivariate regression was performed to estimate the strength of association between ethnicity and provision of analgesia. The effect of patient-nurse ethnicity concordance was assessed. RESULTS: During the 6-year study period, there were 715 children with acute appendicitis, 457 Jews and 258 Arabs. Overall, 289 (40.4%) received some form of analgesia, and 139 (19.4%) received opioid analgesia. Univariate analysis revealed that higher pain score (P<0.001) and higher triage acuity (P<0.001) were associated with administration of any type of analgesia and of opioid analgesia. When adjusted for age, weight, sex, triage category, pain score, and 24-hour time of arrival, Jewish and Arab patients had similar likelihood of receiving analgesia of any type 41.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.3%-43.3%) versus 40.7% (95% CI, 38.7%-42.8%), and receiving opioid analgesia 26.1% (95% CI, 24.4%-27.8%) versus 25.3% (95% CI, 22.9%-27.7%). Similar proportions of Jewish and Arab patients received analgesia from Jewish and Arab nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Low rates of analgesia and opioid administration were found with no ethnic differences.

Differential access to care: The role of age, insurance, and income on race/ethnicity-related disparities in adult perforated appendix admission rates.

BACKGROUND: Differences in perforated appendix admission rates (PAAR) are an ambulatory-sensitive measure of access to care. While pediatric studies report disparities in PAAR, initial adult investigations suggest a lack of racial/ethnic inequity. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess for risk-adjusted, racial/ethnic differences in PAAR among adults on a national scale, (2) consider the extent to which variations (or lack thereof) are explained by age, insurance, and income, and (3) compare results within the United States population to a national segment of the population who are completely insured. METHODS: According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality definition of PAAR, adults (aged 18-64 years) in the 2006-2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were queried for the occurrence and perforation of acute appendicitis. Risk-adjusted differences were compared by race/ethnicity over 5-year age increments using logistic regression with reweighted estimating equations. Noting disparate outcomes between younger (aged 18-34 years) versus older (aged 35-64 years) adults, age-stratified variations were further considered. Results were compared relative to differences among national military/civilian-dependent patients with universal insurance and were assessed for the extent to which disparities could be explained by variations in insurance and income. RESULTS: A total of 129,257 (weighted: 638,452) patients were included. Despite a lack of differences overall, significantly worse outcomes among younger (odds ratio point-estimates ranged from 1.11-1.32) and better outcomes among older (0.78-0.93) minority patients were found. This observation contrasted a lack of differences among completely insured military/civilian-dependent patients (n = 12,154). A total of 22.4% (non-Hispanic black versus non-Hispanic white) and 39.0% (Hispanic versus non-Hispanic white) of younger adult differences were explained by insurance-12.2% and 13.6% by income, 29.8% and 44.0% combined. CONCLUSION: This national assessment of differences in access to care among adults with acute appendicitis demonstrated the existence of racial/ethnic disparities in PAAR that varied with age and were partially, although incompletely, explained by variations in insurance and income.

Appendicitis during pregnancy in a Greenlandic Inuit woman; antibiotic treatment as a bridge-to-surgery in a remote area.

Appendicitis during pregnancy causes severe diagnostic problems, and is associated with an increase in perforation rate and morbidity compared to that in the normal population. In addition, it may cause preterm birth and fetal loss. In remote areas, appendicitis during pregnancy, besides presenting diagnostic problems, also creates treatment difficulties. In Northern Greenland, geographical distances are vast, and weather conditions can be extreme. We report a case of a Greenlandic Inuit woman who presented with appendicitis during pregnancy. The nearest hospital with surgical and anaesthetic care was located nearly 1200 km away, and, due to extreme weather conditions, she could not be transferred immediately. She was treated with intravenous antibiotic treatment, and after weather conditions had improved, she was transferred by aeroplane and underwent appendicectomy. She recovered without complications. Our case suggests that appendicitis during pregnancy may be treated with antibiotics in remote areas until surgical treatment is available.

Predictors of a Prolonged Length of Stay in Children with Perforated Appendicitis.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the factors that affect the length of stay (LOS) of children hospitalized for perforated appendicitis. The objective of this study was to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with a prolonged LOS (PLOS) in children with perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the records of 197 children 0 to 17 years old with perforated appendicitis. The children were hospitalized at one of two teaching hospitals located in El Paso, Texas, and were discharged between January 2008 and January 2014. PLOS was defined as an LOS greater than the 75th percentile value in our patient cohort, which was 7 days. An initial log-binomial regression model failed to converge, and hence logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted incidence odds ratios (OR) for PLOS, 95% confidence intervals, P values, and a receiver operating characteristic curve. The best subset method was used to identify predictors for inclusion in the final model. RESULTS: The overall risk of PLOS was 23.4% (46/197). Approximately 76% of the children who experienced PLOS and 94% of those who did not have PLOS were Hispanic. After adjusting for insurance status, presence of an abscess, asthma, consulting interventional radiology, and various antibiotics, Hispanics were less likely than non-Hispanics to experience PLOS (adjusted OR 0.20; P = 0.003). Children whose providers consulted the interventional radiologist had an increased odds of PLOS (adjusted OR 3.64; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower odds of PLOS, whereas children who required the services of an interventional radiologist were more likely to experience PLOS.

Incidence of appendicitis according to region of origin in first- and second-generation immigrants and adoptees in Sweden. A cohort follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Geographic variations in incidence of appendicitis and proportion of perforations suggest environmental or genetic etiological factors. We study incidence of appendicitis and proportion of perforations according to geographical origin in immigrants and international adoptees in Sweden. METHODS: A cohort of 11,557,566 Swedish residents - 277,104 first- and 377,773 second-generation immigrants and 57,304 adoptees - was followed from 1988 till 2010. Differences in proportion of operation for perforated appendicitis and negative appendectomy and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of perforated and non-perforated appendicitis associated with geographic origin was analyzed. RESULTS: High incidence rates are seen in first- and second-generation immigrants from South America for perforated (SIR 1.58 and 1.81, respectively) and non-perforated appendicitis (SIR 1.18 and 1.22, respectively), and in adoptees from South America for non-perforated appendicitis (SIR 1.07). Low incidence rates are seen for perforated appendicitis in first-generation immigrants and adoptees from Asia (SIR 0.74 and 0.56, respectively), and for non-perforated appendicitis in immigrants from Africa and Asia (SIR 0.69 and 0.76 in first-generation, 0.51 and 0.74 in second-generation, respectively) and in adoptees from Asia (SIR 0.71). A high proportion of perforated appendicitis is associated with a low incidence rate of non-perforated appendicitis but no increase in the incidence rate of perforated appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: The association of different incidence of appendicitis with geographic origin which remains over generations and is seen in adoptees suggest genetic etiologic factors. The proportion of perforation can be high without an increased incidence rate of perforation and is therefore an imperfect indicator of quality of care.

Health outcomes in US children with abdominal pain at major emergency departments associated with race and socioeconomic status.

OBJECTIVE: Over 9.6 million ED visits occur annually for abdominal pain in the US, but little is known about the medical outcomes of these patients based on demographics. We aimed to identify disparities in outcomes among children presenting to the ED with abdominal pain linked to race and SES. METHODS: Data from 4.2 million pediatric encounters of abdominal pain were analyzed from 43 tertiary US children's hospitals, including 2.0 million encounters in the emergency department during 2004-2011. Abdominal pain was categorized as functional or organic abdominal pain. Appendicitis (with and without perforation) was used as a surrogate for abdominal pain requiring emergent care. Multivariate analysis estimated likelihood of hospitalizations, radiologic imaging, ICU admissions, appendicitis, appendicitis with perforation, and time to surgery and hospital discharge. RESULTS: Black and low income children had increased odds of perforated appendicitis (aOR, 1.42, 95% CI, 1.32- 1.53; aOR, 1.20, 95% CI 1.14 - 1.25). Blacks had increased odds of an ICU admission (aOR, 1.92, 95% CI 1.53 - 2.42) and longer lengths of stay (aHR, 0.91, 95% CI 0.86 - 0.96) than Whites. Minorities and low income also had lower rates of imaging for their appendicitis, including CT scans. The combined effect of race and income on perforated appendicitis, hospitalization, and time to surgery was greater than either separately. CONCLUSIONS: Based on race and SES, disparity of health outcomes exists in the acute ED setting among children presenting with abdominal pain, with differences in appendicitis with perforation, length of stay, and time until surgery.

Ethnic variations in five lower gastrointestinal diseases: Scottish health and ethnicity linkage study.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to augment the limited evidence mainly from local, clinical studies of ethnic differences in gastrointestinal disorders. Our question was: are there ethnic variations in hospitalisation/death for lower gastrointestinal disorders in Scotland? SETTING: Scotland. POPULATION: This retrospective-cohort linked 4.65 (of 4.9) million people in the 2001 census of Scotland (providing data on ethnicity, country of birth and indicators of socioeconomic deprivation) to 9 years of National Health Service hospitalisation and death records. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: For appendicitis, we studied all ages; for irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and diverticular disease, we included those ≥20 years. Using Poisson regression (robust variance) we calculated, by ethnic group and sex, first-hospitalisation/death age-adjusted rates per 100,000 person-years, and relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs multiplied by 100, so the White Scottish reference population had an RR=100. RESULTS: There were ethnic variations; for example, for irritable bowel syndrome, RRs (95% CIs) were comparatively high in Other White British women (128.4 (111.0 to 148.6)), and low in Pakistani women (75.1 (60.6 to 93.1)). For appendicitis, RRs were high in men in Other White British (145.2 (127.8 to 164.9)), and low in most non-White groups, for example, Pakistanis (73.8 (56.9 to 95.6)). For ulcerative colitis, RRs were high in Indian (169.8 (109.7 to 262.7)) and Pakistani (160.8 (104.2 to 248.2)) men. For Crohn's disease, the RR was high in Pakistani men (209.2 (149.6 to 292.6)). For diverticular disease, RRs were high in Irish men (176.0 (156.9 to 197.5)), and any Mixed background women (144.6 (107.4 to 194.8)), and low in most non-White groups, for example, Chinese men (47.1 (31.0 to 71.6) and women (46.0 (30.4 to 69.8)). CONCLUSIONS: Appendicitis and diverticular disease were comparatively low in most non-White groups, while ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease were mostly higher in South Asians. Describing and understanding such patterns may help clinical practice and research internationally.

The accuracy of the Alvarado score in predicting acute appendicitis in the black South African population needs to be validated.

BACKGROUND: The Alvarado score is the most widely used clinical prediction tool to facilitate decision-making in patients with acute appendicitis, but it has not been validated in the black South African population, which has much wider differential diagnosis than developed world populations. We investigated the applicability of this score to our local population and sought to introduce a checklist for rural doctors to facilitate early referral. METHODS: We analyzed patients with proven appendicitis for the period January 2008 to December 2012. Alvarado scores were retrospectively assigned based on patients' admission charts. We generated a clinical probability score (1-4 = low, 5-6 = intermediate, 7-10 = high). RESULTS: We studied 1000 patients (54% male, median age 21 yr). Forty percent had inflamed, nonperforated appendices and 60% had perforated appendices. Alvarado scores were 1-4 in 20.9%, 5-6 in 35.7% and 7-10 in 43.4%, indicating low, intermediate and high clincial probability, respectively. In our subgroup analysis of 510 patients without generalized peritonitis, Alvarado scores were 1-4 in 5.5%, 5-6 in 18.1% and 7-10 in 76.4%, indicating low, intermediate and high clinical probability, respectively. CONCLUSION: The widespread use of the Alvarado score has its merits, but its applicability in the black South African population is unclear, with a significant proportion of patients with the disease being potentially missed. Further prospective validation of the Alvarado score and possible modification is needed to increase its relevance in our setting.

CONTEXTE: Le score d'Alvarado est l'outil de prédiction clinique le plus couramment utilisé pour faciliter la prise de décision chez les patients présentant une appendicite aiguë, mais il n'a pas été validé dans la population noire sud-africaine chez qui le diagnostic différentiel est beaucoup plus vaste que dans les populations des pays industrialisés. Nous avons exploré l'applicabilité de ce score à notre population locale et tenté de présenter une liste de vérification aux médecins ruraux pour accélérer les demandes de consultation. MÉTHODES: Nous avons analysé les dossiers de patients atteints d'une appendicite avérée pendant la période allant de janvier 2008 à décembre 2012. Les scores d'Alvarado ont été assignés rétrospectivement selon les dossiers d'admission des patients. Nous avons généré un score de probabilité clinique (1­4 = faible, 5­6 = intermédiaire, 7­10 = élevé). RÉSULTATS: Nous avons ainsi étudié 1000 patients (54 % de sexe masculin, âge médian 21 ans). Quarante pour cent présentaient des appendices enflammés non perforés et 60 % des appendices perforés. Les scores d'Alvarado se situaient à 1­4 chez 20,9 %, à 5­6 chez 35,7 % et à 7­10 chez 43,4 %, correspondant à une probabilité clinique faible, intermédiaire et élevée, respectivement. Dans notre analyse de sous-groupes sur 510 patients indemnes de péritonite généralisée, les scores d'Alvarado se situaient à 1­4 chez 5,5 %, à 5­6 chez 18,1 % et à 7­10 chez 76,4 %, correspondant à une probabilité clinique faible, intermédiaire et élevée, respectivement. CONCLUSION: L'utilisation répandue du score d'Alvarado a ses mérites, mais son applicabilité dans la population noire d'Afrique du Sud est indéterminée, la maladie risquant de passer inaperçue chez une proportion significative de patients. Il faudra procéder à une validation prospective plus approfondie du score d'Alvarado et le modifier peut-être si l'on veut en accroître la pertinence dans notre contexte.

The effect of race on outcomes for appendicitis in children: a nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the impact of race on the management and outcomes of appendicitis in children aged 20 years or younger. METHODS: We studied 96,865 inpatient admissions for children undergoing an appendectomy for acute appendicitis in 2009 using the Kids' Inpatient Database. RESULTS: Perforation at presentation was more common among African-Americans and Hispanics than Caucasians (27.5% and 32.5%, respectively, vs 23.9%, P < .001). African-Americans were less likely to have a laparoscopic procedure (odds ratio [OR]: .839, P < .001) and more likely to experience a complication (OR: 1.753, P < .001). Hispanics were also more likely to have a complication (OR: 1.123, P = .001). African-Americans and Hispanics remained in the hospital for .73 more days than Caucasians (3.07 vs 2.34 days, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: African-American and Hispanic children present more often with perforation. Adjusting for perforation, they were more likely to have a complication and longer hospital stays. Access to care and delayed presentations may be potential explanations.

Predictors of appendiceal perforation in an equal access system.

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies in socioeconomic factors have been associated with higher rates of perforated appendicitis. As an equal-access health care system theoretically removes these barriers, we aimed to determine if remaining differences in demographics, education, and pay result in disparate outcomes in the rate of perforated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis (November 2004-October 2009) at a tertiary care equal access institution were categorized by demographics and perioperative data. Rank of the sponsor was used as a surrogate for economic status. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to determine patient and clinical characteristics associated with perforated appendicitis. RESULTS: A total of 680 patients (mean age 30±16 y; 37% female) were included. The majority were Caucasian (56.4% [n=384]; African Americans 5.6% [n=38]; Asians 1.9% [n=13]; and other 48.9% [n=245]) and enlisted (87.2%). Overall, 6.4% presented with perforation, with rates of 6.6%, 5.8%, and 6.7% (P=0.96) for officers, enlisted soldiers, and contractors, respectively. There was no difference in perforation when stratified by junior or senior status for either officers or enlisted (9.3% junior versus 4.40% senior officers, P=0.273; 6.60% junior versus 5.50% senior enlisted, P=0.369). On multivariate analysis, parameters such as leukocytosis and temperature, as well as race and rank were not associated with perforation (P=0.7). Only age had a correlation, with individuals aged 66-75 y having higher perforation rates (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In an equal-access health care system, older age, not socioeconomic factors, correlated with increased appendiceal perforation rates.

Effect of Hispanic ethnicity and language barriers on appendiceal perforation rates and imaging in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between Hispanic ethnicity and limited English proficiency (LEP) and the rates of appendiceal perforation and advanced radiologic imaging (computed tomography and ultrasound) in children with abdominal pain. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study of children aged 3-18 years presenting with abdominal pain concerning for appendicitis between March 2009 and April 2010 at 10 tertiary care pediatric emergency departments in the US. Appendiceal perforation and advanced imaging rates were compared between ethnic and language proficiency groups using simple and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Of 2590 patients enrolled, 1001 (38%) had appendicitis, including 36% of non-Hispanics and 44% of Hispanics. In multivariate modeling, Hispanics with LEP had a significantly greater odds of appendiceal perforation (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.20-1.74). Hispanics with LEP with appendiceal perforation of moderate clinical severity were less likely to undergo advanced imaging compared with English-speaking non-Hispanics (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). CONCLUSION: Hispanic ethnicity with LEP is an important risk factor for appendiceal perforation in pediatric patients brought to the emergency department with possible appendicitis. Among patients with moderate clinical severity, Hispanic ethnicity with LEP appears to be associated with lower imaging rates. This effect of English proficiency and Hispanic ethnicity warrants further investigation to understand and overcome barriers, which may lead to increased appendiceal perforation rates and differential diagnostic evaluation.

Examining patient race and area predictors of inpatient admission for schizophrenia among hospital users in California.

According to international research African-Caribbean and Black African populations have increased risk of hospitalization for schizophrenia, compared to Whites. Less is known about admission risk for other racial-ethnic groups. This study investigated racial-ethnic differences in hospital admission for schizophrenia in California. It also investigated the influence of area social factors (racial-ethnic neighborhood composition, and per capita income) and health service factors (presence of primary care clinics). The study sample included individuals admitted to a California hospital during 1990-2005 with a primary appendicitis related diagnosis, and without a prior or concurrent indication of schizophrenia. The adjusted logistic model examined how patient racial-ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Other), other personal, area social characteristics and presence of primary care clinics influenced hospital admissions for schizophrenia. Black individuals were almost twice as likely as Whites to be admitted while Hispanics and Other race individuals were less to be admitted. In addition, male sex, having more comorbidities and living in areas with greater proportions of non-Whites increased risk. The increased risk for Blacks compared to Whites was consistent with the existing literature. However, this is among the first studies to report that Hispanics had a reduced risk of admission for schizophrenia, compared to Whites. Future studies may want to include a broader range of health services to better understand patterns of care use among individuals with schizophrenia.

Delays in treatment of pediatric appendicitis: a more accurate variable for measuring pediatric healthcare inequalities?

Racial and socioeconomic factors may cause barriers to healthcare access that result in delayed treatment. Because perforated appendicitis (PA) in children is thought to result from delays in treatment, it is often used as an index of barrier to access. Recent literature suggests that PA is not an inevitable consequence of delayed treatment, so it may not be the best marker for evaluating such barriers. Therefore we investigated whether racial and socioeconomic factors led directly to delays in treatment. We performed a retrospective study of 667 children undergoing appendectomy in a tertiary care center over 12.5 years. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine if racial and socioeconomic variables were associated with increased risk of PA and increased risk of symptom duration greater than 48 hours. Hispanic children have higher rates of PA regardless of delays in treatment whereas black children had higher PA rates likely due to delays in treatment. These differences were not from socioeconomic factors in our cohort. PA, a heterogeneous disease whose course is determined by multiple factors, is not a good metric for evaluation healthcare disparities in the pediatric population. Delays in treatment may be a more appropriate measure of healthcare inequalities in children.

Race and acute abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the demographic and clinical factors of children who present to the pediatric emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain and their outcomes. METHODS: A review of the electronic medical record of patients 1 to 18 years old, who presented to the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh ED with a complaint of abdominal pain over the course of 2 years, was conducted. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as visit outcomes, were reviewed. Subjects were grouped by age, race, and gender. Results of evaluation, treatment, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups by using multivariate analysis and recursive partitioning. RESULTS: There were 9424 patient visits during the study period that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Female gender comprised 61% of African American children compared with 52% of white children. Insurance was characterized as private for 75% of white and 37% of African American children. A diagnosis of appendicitis was present in 1.9% of African American children and 5.1% of white children. Older children were more likely to be admitted and have an operation associated with their ED visit. Appendicitis was uncommon in younger children. Constipation was commonly diagnosed. Multivariate analysis by diagnosis as well as recursive partitioning analysis did not reflect any racial differences in evaluation, treatment, or outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation is the most common diagnosis in children presenting with abdominal pain. Our data demonstrate that no racial differences exist in the evaluation, treatment, and disposition of children with abdominal pain.

Using appendiceal perforation rates to measure impact of a disaster on healthcare system effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES: To understand baseline inequities in appendiceal perforation rates and the impact of hurricane destruction on the healthcare system with respect to perforation rates and racial disparities. METHODS: We used claims data extracted from Medicaid Analytic Extract files to identify appendicitis diagnoses in children and adolescents based on International Classification of Diseases-9 codes and appendectomy procedures based on Current Procedural Terminology codes in the hurricane-affected states of Mississippi and Louisiana. County-level summary data obtained from 2005 Area Resource Files were used to determine high and low hurricane-affected areas. We estimated logistic regression models, mutually adjusting for race, sex, and age, to examine disparities and mixed logistic regression models to determine whether county-level effects contributed to perforation rates. RESULTS: There were nine counties in the high-impact area and 133 counties in the low-impact area. Living in the high- or low-impact area was not associated with a statistically different rate of perforation before or after Hurricane Katrina; however, living in the high-impact area was associated with a change from a lower risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.62) of perforation prehurricane to a higher risk (OR 1.14) posthurricane compared with those living in the low-impact areas. African Americans had statistically higher perforation rates than whites in the high-impact areas both before (OR 1.46) and after (OR 1.71) Hurricane Katrina. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals and hospital systems were able to maintain effective levels of care before and after Hurricane Katrina; however, perforation rates in African Americans suggest ongoing racial disparities during disasters.