Appendiceal neurofibroma and diverticula in a neurofibromatosis type 1 patient with chronic right lower quadrant pain.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1, Von Recklinghausen disease) is an autosomal dominant disease with a birth incidence of 1/2500-3000. The most common presentations of NF1 are cutaneous presentations like café-au-lait spots and neurofibromas. 5%-25% of patients with NF1 have gastrointestinal manifestations of the disease. Appendiceal neurofibroma are extremely rare and only a few cases are described in literature. An appendectomy is indicated because of high risk of appendicitis and malignant transformation. We report the case of a 74-year-old male patient with a history of NF1 with chronic right lower quadrant pain. Successive imaging scans showed suspicion of chronic appendicitis. A diagnostic laparoscopy, resulting in a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed without complications. Histopathology showed appendiceal neurofibroma and diverticula. The postoperative course was uneventful. In patients with NF1 with right lower quadrant pain benign appendiceal neurofibroma should be included in the differential diagnosis. A diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed followed by an appendectomy.

Preemptive Appendicectomy at the Time of Pancreas Transplantation: Is It Necessary?

OBJECTIVES: Pancreas transplant is a major intraabdominal operation, and in most cases the graft is placed in the rightiliac fossa. At our center, preemptive appendicectomy is performed at the time of pancreas transplant to prevent any future risk in a complex transplant patient. The aim of this study was to review all histology reports from the removed appendices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The histology reports from all incidental appendicectomies performed at pancreas transplant were reviewed. RESULTS: Between January 2001 and June 2016, 107 pancreas transplants were performed (86 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants, 11 pancreas after kidney transplants, and 10 pancreas transplants alone), and 65 appendix histology reports were available from this patient group. All were preemptive appendicectomies as none of the patients had symptoms to suggest acute appendicitis. Of the 65 appendix histologies, 43 (66.2%) were reported as normal. Twenty specimens (30.8%) showed fibrosis consistent with previous inflammation of the appendix, and 12 specimens (18.5%) showed fecal material in the lumen (1 due to an obstructing fecalith and another 2 showing luminal distension with feces). Three specimens (4.6%) showed lymphoid hyperplasia. There were 5 (7.7 %) unexpected findings upon histology. In review of histology reports, 1 patient had a 1.1-mm carcinoid tumor in an otherwise normal appendix, 1 had an Enterobius species worm infestation, 1 had focal endometriosis, 1 had crypt abscesses suggestive of inflammatory bowel disease, 1 had a metaplastic polyp, and 1 had melanosis coli of unknown clinical significance. There were no cases of overt acute appendicitis. No patients experienced a complication as a direct result of their appendicectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A policy ofroutine appendicectomy atthe time of pancreas transplant appears to be justified and safe.

[Prophylactic Appendectomy: Yes or No?] / Begleitappendektomie: ja oder nein?

Background At more than 50%, appendicitis is the leading cause of acute intra-abdominal disease requiring surgery. In the course of various other operations, prophylactic appendectomy (PA) is frequently performed. Objectives This study examines to what extent PA is justified. Patients and Methods A prospective study was performed in all patients (n = 173) undergoing prophylactic appendectomy in Katharinen Hospital Unna between January 2010 and October 2013. The following variables were analysed: age, gender, type of primary surgery, emergency or elective surgery, complications, lethality, intraoperative and histopathological evaluation of the appendix. In addition, patients were contacted postoperatively with the request to complete a questionnaire. Results Prophylactic appendectomy was carried out without any specific complications. 117 patients (68%) participated in the survey. 15% of these patients had suffered symptoms that could be attributable to irritation of the appendix. With only one exception, all appendectomy specimens revealed pathological findings in the histopathological examination. PA allowed the early diagnosis of 4 adenomas, one neuroendocrine tumour and 6 metastases or manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Conclusion PA is ethically justifiable, as there are few complications. Moreover, it can help to avoid future appendicitis and allows early detection of malignancies.

Incidental appendectomy during mini incision post-partum sterilization (Chokchai technique): A prospective cross-sectional study.

AIM: We aimed to determine the success rate of incidental appendectomy during post-partum sterilization (PPS) using the Chokchai technique and to compare the postoperative morbidity between patients who underwent this procedure with those who underwent simple PPS. METHODS: Appendectomy during PPS was performed in 141 patients from 1 May 2012 to 30 April 2014. The control group consisted of 182 simple PPS patients. Primary outcomes were the success rate of the procedure and secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and complications. RESULTS: The success rate of this procedure was 98.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay, or postoperative morbidity. Appendectomy added 7.5 min to the total procedure. Intravenous sedation requirements were 13.7% and 33.3% in the control and study groups, respectively. Pathologic evaluation of resected appendices revealed 15 abnormalities (10.8%), including two cases of periappendicitis (1.4%). CONCLUSION: When carried out by experienced surgeons and with appropriate anesthesia, incidental appendectomy during PPS is safe. The Chokchai technique (approach through a small periumbilical incision) achieved a high success rate and resulted in minimal scar. Incidental appendectomy not only prevents any future appendicitis but also helps to detect periappendicitis and treat its primary cause. However, this is an option for only selected patients who are clearly informed about the possible risks and benefits of the procedure.

Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic appendectomy: a Markov model.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery performed in the USA. Removal of a non-inflamed appendix during unrelated abdominal surgery (prophylactic or incidental appendectomy) can prevent the downstream risks and costs of appendicitis. It is unknown whether such a strategy could be cost saving for the health system. METHODS: We considered hypothetical patient cohorts of varying ages from 18 to 80, undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures. A Markov decision model using cost per life-year as the main outcome measure was constructed to simulate the trade-off between cost and risk of prophylactic appendectomy and the ongoing risk of developing appendicitis, with downstream costs and risks. Rates, probabilities, and costs of disease, treatment, and outcomes by patient age and gender were extracted from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complications and costs of prophylactic appendectomy. RESULTS: With our base-case assumptions, including added cost of prophylactic appendectomy of $660, we find that prophylactic removal of the appendix is cost saving for males aged 18-27 and females aged 18-28 undergoing elective surgery. The margin of cost savings depends on remaining life-years and increases exponentially with age: a 20-year-old female undergoing elective surgery could save $130 over a lifetime by undergoing prophylactic appendectomy, while a 40-year-old female would lose $130 over a lifetime. When the risk of the prophylactic appendectomy exceeds the risk of laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis or the cost exceeds $1080, it becomes more cost saving to forego the prophylactic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic appendectomy can be cost saving for patients younger than age thirty undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures.

Systematic review of clinical outcomes after prophylactic surgery.

Introduction Prophylactic appendicectomy is performed prior to military, polar and space expeditions to prevent acute appendicitis in the field. However, the risk-benefit ratio of prophylactic surgery is controversial. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence for prophylactic appendicectomy. It is supplemented by a clinical example of prophylactic surgery resulting in life-threatening complications. Methods A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE(®) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Keyword variants of 'prophylaxis' and 'appendicectomy' were combined to identify potential papers for inclusion. Papers related to prophylactic appendicectomy risks and benefits were reviewed. Results Overall, 511 papers were identified, with 37 papers satisfying the inclusion criteria. Nine reported outcomes after incidental appendicectomy during concurrent surgical procedures. No papers focused explicitly on prophylactic appendicectomy in asymptomatic patients. The clinical example outlined acute obstruction secondary to adhesions from a prophylactic appendicectomy. Complications after elective appendicectomy versus the natural history of acute appendicitis in scenarios such as polar expeditions or covert operations suggest prophylactic appendicectomy may be appropriate prior to extreme situations. Nevertheless, the long-term risk of adhesion related complications render prophylactic appendicectomy feasible only when the short-term risk of acute appendicitis outweighs the long-term risks of surgery. Conclusions Prophylactic appendicectomy is rarely performed and not without risk. This is the first documented evidence of long-term complications following prophylactic appendicectomy. Surgery should be considered on an individual basis by balancing the risks of acute appendicitis in the field with the potential consequences of an otherwise unnecessary surgical procedure in a healthy patient.

Acute nontraumatic general surgical conditions on a combat deployment.

BACKGROUND: Literature is lacking on acute surgical problems that may be encountered on military deployment; even less has been written on whether or not any of these surgical problems could have been avoided with more focused predeployment screening. We sought to determine the burden of illness attributable to acute nontraumatic general surgical problems while on deployment and to identify areas where more rigorous predeployment screening could be implemented to decrease surgical resource use for nontraumatic problems. METHODS: We studied all Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members deployed to Afghanistan between Feb. 7, 2006, and June 30, 2011, who required treatment for a nontraumatic general surgical condition. RESULTS: During the study period 28 990 CAF personnel deployed to Afghanistan; 373 (1.28%) were repatriated because of disease and 100 (0.34%) developed an acute general surgical condition. Among those who developed an acute surgical illness, 42 were combat personnel (42%) and 58 were support personnel (58%). Urologic diagnoses (n = 34) were the most frequent acute surgical conditions, followed by acute appendicitis (n = 18) and hernias (n = 12). We identified 5 areas where intensified predeployment screening could have potentially decreased the incidence of in-theatre acute surgical illness. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there is a significant acute care surgery element encountered on combat deployment, and surgeons tasked with caring for this population should be prepared to treat these patients.

CONTEXTE: Il y a un manque de données sur les problèmes chirurgicaux aigus qui peuvent survenir lors de déploiements militaires, et encore moins sur la question de savoir si on aurait pu éviter ces problèmes en faisant un dépistage plus ciblé avant le déploiement. Nous avons tenté de déterminer le fardeau de la maladie attribuable à des problèmes non traumatiques aigus de chirurgie générale pendant le déploiement, puis d'identifier les domaines où un dépistage préalable plus rigoureux pourrait être mis en oeuvre pour réduire l'utilisation des ressources chirurgicales pour les problèmes non traumatiques. MÉTHODES: Notre étude a porté sur tous les membres des Forces armées canadiennes (FAC) déployés en Afghanistan entre le 7 février 2006 et le 30 juin 2011 et qui ont eu besoin de traitement pour un état chirurgical général non traumatique. RÉSULTANTS: Pendant la période de l'étude, 28 990 membres des FAC ont été déployés en Afghanistan; 373 (1,28 %) ont été rapatriés en raison de maladie et 100 (0,34 %) ont développé un état chirurgical général aigu. Parmi ces derniers, 42 faisaient partie du personnel de combat (42 %) et 58 faisaient partie du personnel de soutien (58 %). Les diagnostics urologiques (n = 34) constituaient les états chirurgicaux aigus les plus fréquents, suivis de l'appendicite aiguë (n = 18) et des hernies (n = 12). Nous avons identifié 5 domaines où un dépistage intensifié, préalable au déploiement, aurait possiblement réduit l'incidence des états chirurgicaux aigus en théâtre d'opérations. CONCLUSION: Il ressort de nos conclusions que les missions de combat comportent un important élément de soins chirurgicaux aigus et que les chirurgiens chargés de soigner cette population devraient être préparés à traiter ces patients.

[Incidental appendectomy: standard or unjustified risk?]. / Gelegenheitsappendektomie: Standard oder ungerechtfertigtes Risiko?

Incidental appendectomy is the surgical removal of a macroscopically non-diseased appendix during another primary surgical procedure. The benefits and risks of this surgery give rise to controversy. Incidental appendectomy is contraindicated in patients whose conditions are unstable, with previous diagnosis of Crohn's disease, inaccessible appendix, planned radiation treatment, immunosuppression, vascular grafts or other intraabdominal foreign material. It should be conditional on primary disease, surgical technique (open vs. laparoscopic) and age of the patient. Independently from the surgical technique used, incidental appendectomy should be evaluated in healthy patients younger than 25 years old. In any case, preoperative informed consent is necessary.

The implications of missed opportunities to diagnose appendicitis in children.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the fraction of children with acute appendicitis who had recent false-negative diagnoses and to analyze the association of a missed diagnosis of appendicitis with patient outcome. METHODS: The records of all 816 patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis at a free-standing children's hospital between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. A patient admitted or evaluated in the emergency department (ED), discharged without a diagnosis of appendicitis, and then readmitted with histopathologically confirmed appendicitis within 3 days was considered to have a "missed diagnosis." Outcomes for this missed group were compared to those of the remainder of the appendectomy cohort. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with appendicitis (4.8%) were missed at initial presentation. The most common initial discharge diagnoses were acute gastroenteritis (43.6%), constipation (10.3%), and emesis (10.3%). The median duration from the initial evaluation to the appendicitis admission was 28.3 hours (interquartile range [IQR] = 17.0 to 39.6 hours). A missed diagnosis was associated with a longer median hospitalization (5.8 days [IQR = 4.0 to 8.1 days] vs. 2.5 days [IQR = 1.8 to 4.6 days]; p < 0.001), higher rate of perforation (74.4% vs. 29.0%; p < 0.001), higher complication rate (28.2% vs. 10.4%; p = 0.002), and higher rate of reintervention (20.5% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Of children diagnosed with appendicitis, 4.8% may have had a missed opportunity for earlier diagnosis. These false-negative diagnoses are associated with higher rates of perforation, postoperative complications, and need for postoperative interventions, as well as longer hospitalizations.

Lombadas podem auxiliar no diagnóstico de apendicite aguda / Spines may aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

A presença de dor durante a passagem de veículos sobre obstáculos redutores de velocidade - também chamados de lombadas ou "quebra-molas" - no caminho para o hospital está associada a uma maior probabilidade de apendicite aguda. A ausência de dor é especialmente eficaz para afastar apendicite, em comparação com outros dados clínicos levantados durante a avaliação.

Does an Acute Surgical Model increase the rate of negative appendicectomy or perforated appendicitis?

INTRODUCTION: The clinical outcomes from suspected appendicitis depend on balancing the rate of negative appendicectomy (NA) with perforated appendicitis (PA). An Acute Surgical Model (ASM) was introduced at Geelong Hospital (GH) in 2011 involving a dedicated emergency general surgery theatre list every business day giving greater access to theatre for general surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the ASM at GH on the management of appendicitis, in particular the NA and PA rates. METHODS: Data for 357 patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy was collected prospectively over 1 year (2011) and compared with a historical control group of 351 patients (2010). The data was analysed for patient demographics, preoperative diagnostic radiology and outcomes including NA and PA rates and complications. The negative appendicectomy rates were compared with contemporary studies. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in rates of negative appendicectomy 21% (ASM; 73/357) versus 21% (Control; 73/351) P = 0.98, or perforated appendicitis 17% (ASM; 61/357) versus 13% (Control; 47/351) P = 0.18. The introduction of the ASM corresponded to a significantly lower proportion of emergency appendicectomies overnight (4% [16/357] versus 12% [44/351] P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the use of preoperative diagnostic radiology or complications. Matched contemporary studies had a NA rate of 26%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the ASM at GH has not significantly altered the rate of NA or PA. The NA rate at GH is comparable to other published UK and Australian series.

Pedunculated hamartomatous polyp of the appendix: report of a case.

We experienced a rare case of a pedunculated polyp of the appendix, which had been incidentally found by preventive appendectomy performed when providing surgical treatment for rectal carcinoma. A pathological investigation of this polypoid lesion demonstrated branches of fibro-muscular stalks connecting with the lamina muscularis covered by a hyperplastic mucosa, which proved to be consistent with the features of hamartoma. The patient had no external characteristics of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, including mucocutaneous pigmentation and gastrointestinal polyposis, observed by endoscopy. This case is considered to be a Peutz-Jeghers type polyp of the appendix with a pedunculated form, which is very rare.

Prophylactic surgery prior to extended-duration space flight: is the benefit worth the risk?

This article explores the potential benefits and defined risks associated with prophylactic surgical procedures for astronauts before extended-duration space flight. This includes, but is not limited to, appendectomy and cholecystesctomy. Furthermore, discussion of treatment during space flight, potential impact of an acute illness on a defined mission and the ethical issues surrounding this concept are debated in detail.

Prophylactic appendectomy: unnecessary in children with incidental appendicoliths detected by computed tomographic scan.

PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding the clinical significance of an isolated appendicolith on computed tomographic (CT) scan. We sought to determine the risk of developing appendicitis in children with an incidentally noted appendicolith. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all pelvic CT scans in patients 18 years or younger at a tertiary care children's hospital from October 2005 to September 2008. Patients with an appendicolith and no radiographic evidence of acute appendicitis were selected for further review. Written questionnaire and telephone follow-up were attempted in all patients. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred thirteen pelvic CT scans were performed during the study period. The incidence of an isolated appendicolith during the study period was 2.6% (n = 75). Seven patients underwent appendectomy at initial presentation. Nine children underwent appendectomy subsequently: 3 electively and 6 at the time of return with abdominal pain. Only 6 of these 16 appendectomy specimens had histologic evidence of appendicitis, whereas only 3 demonstrated an appendicolith. Subsequent appendicitis developed in 5.8% (n = 4) of patients with an isolated appendicolith. Follow-up was achieved in 50% of patients who did not have an appendectomy (median, 2.8 years). CONCLUSION: Children with an incidental appendicolith are at low risk for developing appendicitis. The appendicoliths were often a transient finding not confirmed on surgical pathologic condition or subsequent imaging.

Meta-analysis on surgical infections.

Meta-analysis on surgical infections may be a useful tool that can provide more accurate outcome estimates than other conventional types of studies. Published meta-analyses in surgical infections tend to focus mainly on the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis and on the comparison of different procedures or techniques for the treatment of surgical infections. The majority concern surgical infections in abdominal surgery. However, mortality is reported as primary outcome in few meta-analyses. Meta-analyses focusing exclusively on surgical infections, reporting data on mortality as a primary outcome, and comparing different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of surgical infections should be conducted.

Articulos del cono sur: puntuación diagnostica de apendicitis aguda en niños realizada por pediatrias de la unidades de emergencia / Articles in the Southern Cone: score diagnosed acute appendicitis in children by pediatric emergency units of

Las puntuaciones diagnósticas constituyen métodos sistemáticos para evaluar pacientes con sospecha de apendicitis, ayudan a ordenar el cuadro clínico y buscan los elementos que lo componen para llegar al diagnóstico acertado y oportuno.