Reduced urinary release of AQP1- and AQP2-bearing extracellular vesicles in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Although several studies have shown that release of water channel proteins, aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and AQP2 in urinary extracellular vesicles (uEV-AQP1 and -AQP2), were altered in experimental kidney injury models, their release in human chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether the release of uEV-AQP1 and -AQP2 is altered in patients with CKD. Urine samples were collected from 15 healthy volunteers (normal group) and 62 CKD patients who were categorized into six glomerular filtration rate (GFR) categories (G1, G2, G3a, G3b, G4, and G5) in between 2005 and 2016 at Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Japan. uEV-proteins were evaluated by immunoblot analysis. The release of AQP1 and AQP2 were significantly decreased in patients with both CKD G4 and G5, in comparison with the normal group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values for AQP1 and AQP2 in patients with CKD G4 and G5 were 0.926 and 0.881, respectively. On the other hand, the AUC values in patients with CKD G1-G3 were 0.512 for AQP1 and 0.680 for AQP2. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that AQP1 and AQP2 in combination were useful for detecting CKD G4 and G5, with a higher AUC value of 0.945. These results suggest that the release of uEV-AQP1 and -AQP2 was decreased in patients with CKD G4 and G5, and these proteins might be helpful to detect advanced CKD.

AQP1-Containing Exosomes in Peritoneal Dialysis Effluent As Biomarker of Dialysis Efficiency.

The water channel Aquaporin 1 (AQP1) plays a fundamental role in water ultrafiltration during peritoneal dialysis (PD) and its reduced expression or function may be responsible for ultrafiltration failure (UFF). In humans, AQP1 is expressed in the endothelium of the peritoneal capillaries but its expression in mesothelial cells (MC) and its functional role in PD is still being debated. Here, we studied a cohort of 30 patients using PD in order to determine the presence of AQP1 in peritoneal biopsies, AQP1 release in the PD effluent through exosomes and the correlation of AQP1 abundance with the efficiency of peritoneal ultrafiltration. The experiments using immunofluorescence showed a strong expression of AQP1 in MCs. Immunoblotting analysis on vesicles isolated from PD effluents showed a consistent presence of AQP1, mesothelin and Alix and the absence of the CD31. Thus, this suggests that they have an exclusive mesothelial origin. The immunoTEM analysis showed a homogeneous population of nanovesicles and confirmed the immunoblotting results. Interestingly, the quantitative analysis by ELISA showed a positive correlation between AQP1 in the PD effluent and ultrafiltration (UF), free water transport (FWT) and Na-sieving. This evidence opens the discussion on the functional role of mesothelial AQP1 during PD and suggests that it may represent a potential non-invasive biomarker of peritoneal barrier integrity, with predictive potential of UFF in PD patients.

Urinary aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2: Can these novel markers accurately characterize small renal masses and help guide patient management?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of urine aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 as biomarkers adjunct to renal mass biopsy in guiding the management of patients with small renal masses. METHODS: Preoperative aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 levels in 57 patients with small renal masses undergoing partial nephrectomy were analyzed and compared with postoperative tumor histology. An algorithm was created utilizing aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 in conjunction with renal mass biopsy. Cut-off values were implemented to maximize biomarker sensitivity and specificity. Renal mass biopsy utilization and intervention were then compared with rates in traditional renal mass biopsy algorithms. RESULTS: All clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas were correctly identified and assigned to the treatment path. All benign lesions were correctly sorted to a confirmatory renal mass biopsy path. Two chromophobe masses did not have elevated aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2, and would require renal mass biopsy. Compared with protocols that call for all small renal masses to be biopsied, confirmatory renal mass biopsy could have been safely avoided in 74% of patients with elevated aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2. Compared with protocols that do not utilize renal mass biopsy, surgical intervention would have been avoided in 23% of patients with benign masses. CONCLUSIONS: Aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 possess high sensitivity and specificity for detecting clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma. Use of these markers might compliment renal mass biopsy in the characterization of small renal masses.

Urinary podocyte-associated molecules and albuminuria in hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension-induced podocyte damage and the relationship with UAE is analyzed in diabetic and nondiabetic participants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four hypertensive patients, 30 diabetics, with glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m were included. Urinary albumin excretion was measured in morning urine using a nephelometric immunoassay and expressed as albumin/creatinine ratio. Urinary pellets were obtained from fresh urine and mRNA was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR. Likewise, protein podocyte-specific molecules were measured by western blot using specific antibodies. RESULTS: Fourteen nondiabetics and 20 diabetics had increased UAE greater than 30 mg/g. In individuals with increased EUA, the mRNA expression of nephrin and CD2AP was low in diabetics, whereas only nephrin mRNA in nondiabetics. No differences were observed in podocalyxin and aquaporin-1 mRNA levels. Concerning the protein values, in both nondiabetic and diabetic patients, nephrin, CD2AP and podocalyxin were increased in patients with increased UAE, with no differences in aquaporin-1. A significant positive relationship was observed between log UAE and nephrin protein values, and an inverse association observed with mRNA. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive patients who had elevated UAE showed increased urinary excretion of podocyte-specific proteins coupled with a phenotype of decreased mRNA expression. The phenotype of podocyte-specific mRNA and the increment of nephrin can be used as a valuable marker of early glomerular injury.

Characterization of urinary exosomal release of aquaporin-1 and -2 after renal ischemia-reperfusion in rats.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and an alteration in renal water handling has been observed during the transition of AKI to CKD. Urinary exosomal release of aquaporin-1 (AQP1) and AQP2, important proteins for renal water handling, has recently been reported to predict their levels of renal expression. Therefore, we examined the patterns of urinary exosomal release of AQP1 and AQP2, and the exosomal marker proteins tumor susceptibility 101 protein (TSG101) and ALG-2 interacting protein X (Alix), in the acute and chronic phases following induction of AKI by renal bilateral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) in rats. Blood tests and histological examinations indicated that AKI occurred before at 7 days after renal I/R ( day 7) and that renal fibrosis developed progressively thereafter. Immunoblotting demonstrated significant decreases in the urinary exosomal release of AQP1 and AQP2 during severe AKI. Urinary exosomal release of Alix and TSG101 was significantly increased on day 7. These data were also confirmed in rats with unilateral renal I/R causing more serious AKI. Urinary exosomal release of either the Ser-256- or Ser-269-phosphorylated form of AQP2, both of which are involved in apical trafficking of AQP2, was positively correlated with that of total AQP2. These results suggest that urinary exosomal release of AQP1 and AQP2 is reduced in I/R-induced AKI, whereas that of Alix and TSG101 is increased in the initial phase of renal fibrosis. Furthermore, apical trafficking of AQP2 appears to be related to urinary exosomal release of AQP2.

Urinary KIM-1 and AQP-1 in patients with clear renal cell carcinoma: Potential noninvasive biomarkers.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and aquaporin-1 (AQP-1) are potential early urinary biomarkers of clear renal cell carcinoma (cRCC). The aim of this study was to ascertain relationship between the urine concentrations KIM-1 and AQP-1 with tumor size, grade, pT stage and type of operation (radical or partial nephrectomy) in patients with cRCC. METHODS: Urinary concentrations of urinary KIM-1 (uKIM-1) and urinary AQP-1 (uAQP-1) were determined by commercially available ELISA kits. The analysis included 40 patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy for cRCC and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy adult volunteers. RESULTS: The median preoperative concentrations of KIM-1 in the cRCC group [0.724 ? 1.120 ng/mg urinary creatinine (Ucr)] were significantly greater compared with controls (healthy volunteers) (0.210 +/- 0.082 ng/mgUcr) (p = 0.0227). Postoperatively, uKIM-1 concentration decreased significantly to control values (0.177 +/- 0.099 ng/mgUcr vs 0.210 + 0.082 ng/mgUcr, respectively). The size, grade and stage of tumor were correlated positively with preoperative uKIM-1 concentrations. Contrary to these results, concentrations of uAQP-1 in the cRCC group were significantly lower (0.111 +/- 0.092 ng/mgUcr) compared with the control group (0.202 +/- 0.078 ng/mgUcr) (p = 0.0014). Postoperatively, the concentrations of uAQP-1 increased progressively up to control values, approximately. We find no significant correlation between preoperative uAQP-1 concentrations and tumor size, grade and stage. CONCLUSION: uKIM-1 was found to be a reliable diagnostic marker of cRCC, based on its significantly increased values before and decreased values after the nephrectomy.

Acetazolamide enhances the release of urinary exosomal aquaporin-1.

BACKGROUND: Renal aquaporin-1 (AQP1), a water channel protein, is known to be secreted into urine, conveyed by nano-sized extracellular vesicles called exosomes. A previous study has demonstrated that acetazolamide (AZ), a diuretic that inhibits carbonic anhydrases, alters the expression level of AQP1 in cultured cells. Here we investigated whether AZ alters the release of urinary exosomal AQP1 in vivo. METHODS: The effect of AZ on urinary exosomal AQP1 secretion was examined in rats and compared with furosemide (another diuretic), NaHCO3 (an alkalizing agent) and NH4Cl (an acidifying agent). Urine, blood and kidney samples were obtained 2 h after each treatment. Urinary exosomes were isolated by a differential centrifugation technique and urinary exosomal proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. RESULTS: The release of exosomal AQP1 into urine was markedly increased after treatment with AZ, accompanied by alkaluria and metabolic acidosis. Immunohistochemistry clearly demonstrated that AZ increased the apical membrane expression of AQP1 in the proximal tubules. AZ did not affect the release of exosomal marker proteins (tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein and apoptosis-linked gene 2 interacting protein X). Treatment with furosemide did not change, whereas NaHCO3 and NH4Cl decreased the exosomal release of AQP1. CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that AZ increases the release of exosomal AQP1 into urine in association with enhanced apical membrane expression of AQP1.

Expression pattern of aquaporins in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome with edema.

The association between the expression of aquaporins (AQPs) in kidney tissues and the occurrence of edema in nephrotic syndrome (NS) remains unclear. The current study aimed to investigate this association. A total of 54 patients with primary glomerular disease, diagnosed by renal biopsy, were divided into three groups: Control, NS without edema and NS with edema. The expression of AQP1, AQP2, AQP3 and AQP4 in kidney tissues from these patients was assessed using immunohistochemistry, and urinary AQP concentrations were quantified by ELISA. Comparison of the three groups was conducted using one way analysis of variance, independent samples t­test or the Chi­square test. AQP1 was strongly expressed in the proximal tubules. The proportion of the AQP1­positive area in kidney tissues from patients with NS with edema was significantly reduced, in comparison with the other two groups. By contrast, the proportion of the AQP2­positive area in the NS with edema group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups; significant differences were also observed between the control and NS without edema groups for this parameter. Urinary AQP2 concentrations in patients with NS (with and without edema) were significantly higher than that of the control group, and exhibited a significant positive correlation with kidney tissue AQP2 concentrations. The present study demonstrated the abnormal expression pattern of AQP1­AQP4 in the kidney tissues of patients with NS, providing a basis for an improved understanding of the role of AQP in the pathogenesis of NS.

Evaluation of Urine Aquaporin-1 and Perilipin-2 Concentrations as Biomarkers to Screen for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: Historically, early detection of small asymptomatic kidney tumors presages better patient outcome. Screening for asymptomatic renal tumors by abdominal imaging is not cost-effective and cannot reliably distinguish benign from malignant tumors. OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluated the clinical utility, sensitivity, and specificity of urine aquaporin-1 (AQP1) and perilipin-2 (PLIN2) concentrations as unique, noninvasive biomarkers to diagnose malignant clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a screening paradigm. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From February through December 2012, urine samples were obtained from 720 patients undergoing routine abdominal computed tomography (CT) (screening population), 80 healthy controls, and 19 patients with pathologically confirmed RCC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations were measured by sensitive and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot procedures, respectively, in all groups. In the otherwise asymptomatic screening population, the absence or presence of a renal mass and RCC were verified by abdominal CT and by postnephrectomy pathologic diagnosis, respectively. RESULTS: Urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations were significantly higher (all P < .001) in the 19 patients with known RCC (AQP1 median [95% CI], 225.0 [121.0-450.0] ng/mg urine creatinine; and PLIN2 median [95% CI], 37.8 [22.8-83.7] absorbance units/mg creatinine) than in the 80 healthy controls (AQP1 median [95% CI], 1.1 [0.9-1.3] ng/mg urine creatinine; and PLIN2 median [95% CI], 3.1 [2.4-3.7] absorbance units/mg creatinine) and the 720 patient screening population (AQP1 median [95% CI], 0.5 [0.0-1.0] ng/mg urine creatinine; and PLIN2 median [95% CI], 0 [0-0] absorbance units/mg creatinine). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations individually or in combination was 0.990 or greater, with 95% or greater sensitivity and 91% or greater specificity compared with controls or the screening population. Of the 720 screened patients, 3 had biomarker concentrations suggestive of RCC and were found to have an imaged renal mass by CT. Two of the patients had pathologically confirmed RCC in further evaluation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results demonstrate the clinical utility, specificity, and sensitivity of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 to diagnose RCC. These tumor-specific proteins have high clinical validity and substantial potential as specific diagnostic and screening biomarkers for clear cell or papillary RCC and in the differential diagnosis of imaged renal masses.

Urine aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 differentiate renal carcinomas from other imaged renal masses and bladder and prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of urine aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and perilipin 2 (PLIN2) concentrations to diagnose clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by comparing urine concentrations of these unique biomarkers in patients with RCC, noncancer renal masses, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer. METHODS: From February 1, 2012, through October 31, 2012, preoperative urine samples were obtained from patients with a presumptive diagnosis of RCC based on an imaged renal mass, prostate cancer, or transitional cell bladder cancer. Imaged renal masses were diagnosed postnephrectomy­as malignant or benign­by histology. Urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations were measured by using a sensitive and specific Western blot and normalized to urine creatinine concentration. RESULTS: Median concentrations of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 in patients with clear cell and papillary RCC (n=47) were 29 and 36 relative absorbance units/mg urine creatinine, respectively. In contrast, median concentrations in patients with bladder cancer (n=22) and prostate cancer (n=27), patients with chromophobe tumors (n=7), and patients with benign renal oncocytomas (n=9) and angiomyolipomas (n=7) were all less than 10 relative absorbance units/mg urine creatinine (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<.001 vs RCC for both biomarkers) and comparable with those in healthy controls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.99 to 1.00 for both biomarkers. CONCLUSION: These results support the specificity and sensitivity of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations for RCC. These novel tumor-specific proteins have high clinical validity and high potential as specific screening biomarkers for clear cell and papillary RCC as well as in the differential diagnosis of imaged renal masses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00851994.

Aquaporin-1 protein levels elevated in fresh urine of renal cell carcinoma patients: potential use for screening and classification of incidental renal lesions.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There are over 65,000 new cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) each year, yet there is no effective clinical screening test for RCC. A single report claimed no overlap between urine levels of aquaporin-1 (AQP1) in patients with and without RCC (Mayo Clin Proc. 85:413, 2010). Here, we used archived and fresh RCC patient urine to validate this report. METHODS: Archived RCC, fresh prenephrectomy RCC, and non-RCC negative control urines were processed for Western blot analysis. Urinary creatinine concentrations were quantified by the Jaffe reaction (Nephron 16:31, 1976). Precipitated protein was dissolved in 1x SDS for a final concentration of 2 µg/µL creatinine. RESULTS: Negative control and archived RCC patient urine failed to show any AQP1 protein by Western blot analysis. Fresh RCC patient urine is robustly positive for AQP1. There was no signal overlap between fresh RCC and negative control, making differentiation straightforward. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirms that fresh urine of patients with RCC contains easily detectable AQP1 protein. However, archival specimens showed an absence of detectable AQP1 indistinguishable from negative control. These findings suggest that a clinically applicable diagnostic test for AQP1 in fresh urine may be useful for detecting RCC.

Urinary concentrations of aquaporin-1 and perilipin-2 in patients with renal cell carcinoma correlate with tumor size and stage but not grade.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trends in urine aquaporin-1 (AQP1) and perilipin 2 (PLIN2) concentrations in patients with clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we determined the relationship between the urine concentration of these biomarkers and tumor size, grade, and stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biomarker concentrations were determined by sensitive and specific Western blot procedures normalized to the urine creatinine excretion. The analysis included 61 patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy for clear cell or papillary RCC and 43 age- and sex-matched control patients. Relationships between urine biomarker concentrations and tumor size, stage, and grade were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with RCC had 35-fold and 9-fold higher median urinary AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations, respectively, compared with controls. Both tumor markers decreased after tumor resection to concentrations equivalent to those of controls. The sensitivity and specificity were both 100% for AQP1 and 92% and 100%, respectively, for PLIN2. A significant linear correlation was found between the tumor size and the prenephrectomy AQP1 (Spearman coefficient 0.78, P <.001) and PLIN2 (Spearman coefficient 0.69, P <.001) concentrations. A correlation was found for both markers with tumor stage (overall P = .030), when the stage was dependent primarily on the tumor size (stages T1 and T2), but not with stage T3, which reflected extrarenal spread. Neither marker showed a significant correlation with tumor grade. CONCLUSION: AQP1 and PLIN2 were significantly increased in patients with clear cell and papillary RCC compared with controls. The preoperative urinary concentrations of these markers reflected the tumor size and stage.

The specificity of urinary aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 to screen for renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Renal cancer is frequently asymptomatic until late stages of the disease and it has a poor prognosis when not discovered early. AQP1 and PLIN2 are recently discovered, sensitive urine biomarkers of clear cell and papillary kidney cancer. We validated these biomarkers in a second cohort of patients and determined the effect of common kidney diseases on specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples were obtained from 36 patients with clear cell or papillary kidney cancer, 43 controls, 44 patients with documented urinary tract infection, 24 diagnosed with diabetic nephropathy and 18 diagnosed with glomerulonephritis. Urine levels of AQP1 and PLIN2 normalized to urine creatinine were determined by a sensitive, specific Western blot procedure. RESULTS: Compared with controls, urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels in patients with kidney cancer were 23-fold and fourfold greater, respectively, and they decreased 83% to 84% after tumor excision. There was a linear correlation between urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels, and tumor size (each p <0.001). Urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels in patients with kidney cancer were 11 to 23-fold and 17 to 25-fold greater, respectively, than in patients with the common kidney diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 to identify patients with kidney cancer compared to controls was validated in a second cohort of patients. Common kidney diseases do not adversely increase urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels or decrease their specificity to screen for renal cancer.

Early alteration of urinary exosomal aquaporin 1 and transforming growth factor ß1 after release of unilateral pelviureteral junction obstruction.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Down-regulation of aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and up-regulation of transforming growth factor ß(1) (TGF-ß(1)) in the renal parenchyma have been demonstrated in children who underwent pyeloplasty for pelviureteral junction obstruction. However, no information about urinary exosomal AQP1 and TGF-ß(1) during postobstructive polyuria in children with congenital unilateral hydronephrosis is available. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the urine concentration of exosomal AQP1 and TGF-ß(1) on the first and the second day after surgery in children who underwent pyeloplasty. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (age, 36.2 ± 17.1 months) with unilateral pelviureteral junction obstruction were examined in the study. For the first 2 days after the operation, the urine was collected separately from pyelostomy draining only from the postobstructed kidney and from the bladder catheter draining mostly from the contralateral kidney, which was used as an internal control. Urinary output, urinary osmolality, sodium, ß(2)-microglobulin (ß(2)-MG), and creatinine, as well as urinary exosomal AQP1 and TGF-ß(1) excretion, were tested in each sample. RESULTS: After pyeloplasty, a significantly decreased urinary excretion of exosomal AQP1 (≈ 64%) was found in the postobstructed kidney. The patients developed polyuria (807 ± 216 mL/24 h vs 484 ± 144 mL/24 h at day 1, 1021 ± 348 mL/24 h vs 603 ± 228 mL/24 h at day 2; P < .01) and reduced urine osmolality (115 ± 44 mOsm/kg vs 282 ± 61 mOsm/kg at day 1, 139 ± 39 vs 303 ± 46 mOsm/kg at day 2; P < .01) that persisted for 48 hours. In parallel, urinary TGF-ß(1) and ß(2)-MG (normalized for creatinine) from the postobstructed kidney were significantly higher compared with the contralateral kidney. The urine output and urinary sodium concentration from the postobstructed kidney elevated significantly on the second day after the release of obstruction compared with those on the first day. The contralateral kidney also showed same trends. CONCLUSIONS: The down-regulation of urinary exosomal AQP1 in the postobstructed kidney may account for the polyuria, hypotonic urine, and elevated urinary ß(2)-MG. The urinary TGF-ß(1) level locally increased in the postobstructed kidney may be involved in renal AQP1 down-regulation.

Urinary biomarkers for the early diagnosis of kidney cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that increased tumor expression of proteins such as aquaporin-1 (AQP1) and adipophilin (ADFP) in patients with renal cancer would result in increased urine AQP1 and ADFP excretion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prenephrectomy and postnephrectomy (pseudocontrol) urine samples were collected from 42 patients with an incidental radiographically discovered renal mass and presurgical presumptive diagnosis of kidney cancer from July 8, 2008, through March 10, 2009. Also enrolled were 15 control patients who underwent nonrenal surgery and 19 healthy volunteers. Urine AQP1 and ADFP concentrations normalized to urine creatinine were determined by sensitive and specific Western blot assays. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD preexcision urine AQP1 and ADFP concentrations (76+/-29 and 117+/-74 arbitrary units, respectively) in patients with a pathologic diagnosis of clear cell (n=22) or papillary (n=10) cancer were significantly greater than in patients with renal cancer of nonproximal tubule origin, control surgical patients, and healthy volunteers (combined values of 0.1+/-0.1 and 1.0+/-1.6 arbitrary units, respectively; n=44; P<.001). The AQP1 and ADFP concentrations decreased 88% to 97% in the 25 patients with clear cell or papillary cancer who provided postnephrectomy follow-up urine samples. In patients with clear cell and papillary carcinoma, a linear correlation (Spearman) was found between tumor size and preexcision urine AQP1 or ADFP concentration (r=0.82 and 0.76, respectively; P<.001 for each). CONCLUSION: Urine AQP1 and ADFP concentrations appear to be sensitive and specific biomarkers of kidney cancers of proximal tubule origin. These biomarkers may be useful to diagnose an imaged renal mass and screen for kidney cancer at an early stage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00851994.

Decreased abundance of urinary exosomal aquaporin-1 in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Urinary exosomes, secreted into urine from renal epithelial cells, are known to contain many types of renal functional membrane proteins. Here, we studied whether renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) affects urinary exosomal aquaporin-1 (AQP1) excretion in rats subjected to renal I/R and patients who underwent renal transplantation. Immunoblotting studies demonstrated reduction of the urinary exosomal AQP1 level even at 6 h after renal I/R, and the level continued to be low over 96 h after I/R. Renal AQP1 mRNA and protein analyses revealed that the decreased excretion of urinary exosomal AQP1 is associated with renal AQP1 protein retention in the early phase and with a decreased expression level of renal AQP1 in the later phase of renal I/R injury. Decreased abundance of urinary exosomal AQP1 in a recipient patient was also observed at 48 h after renal allograft transplantation. No significant decrease in urinary exosomal AQP1 was observed in a rat model of nephropathy or in patients with proteinuria. Our studies suggest that the renal AQP1 expression level is possibly controlled by its urinary exosomal excretion and indicate that urinary exosomal AQP1 is a novel urinary biomarker for renal I/R injury.

Aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 urinary excretion in cirrhosis: Relationship with ascites and hepatorenal syndrome.

Several experimental models of cirrhosis have shown dysregulation of renal aquaporins in different phases of liver disease. We investigated the urinary excretion of both aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 in patients with cirrhosis at different stages of the disease. Twenty-four-hour urine was collected from 11 healthy volunteers, 13 patients with compensated cirrhosis (without ascites), and 20 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (11 with ascites without renal failure and 9 with hepatorenal syndrome). Aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 excretion was analyzed by immunoblotting. Urinary aquaporin-2 excretion was reduced in patients with cirrhosis compared to healthy subjects. A progressive decrease in urinary aquaporin-2 excretion was observed as the severity of cirrhosis increased, from compensated cirrhosis to cirrhosis with ascites and hepatorenal syndrome. Patients with hyponatremia had lower urinary aquaporin-2 excretion than patients without hyponatremia. Vasopressin plasma level did not correlate with aquaporin-2 excretion. There were no differences between healthy subjects and patients with cirrhosis with or without ascites in urinary excretion of aquaporin-1, but urinary aquaporin-1 excretion of those with hepatorenal syndrome was extremely low. In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis appear to exhibit a decreased abundance of renal aquaporin-2 and therefore lower water permeability in the collecting tubules. This may represent an adaptive renal response to sodium retention, with expansion of extracellular fluid volume and dilutional hyponatremia observed in those who have cirrhosis with ascites. Finally, aquaporin-1 does not appear to play a role in the progressive dysregulation of extracellular fluid volume in cirrhosis.