Microstructural Injury to Left-Sided Perisylvian White Matter Predicts Language Decline After Brain Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to investigate the association between imaging biomarkers of radiation-induced white matter (WM) injury within perisylvian regions and longitudinal language decline in patients with brain tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with primary brain tumors (n = 44) on a prospective trial underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and language assessments of naming (Boston Naming Test [BNT]) and fluency (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Category Fluency [DKEFS-CF]) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after fractionated radiation therapy (RT). Reliable change indices of language function (0-6 months), accounting for practice effects (RCI-PE), evaluated decline. Bilateral perisylvian WM regions (superficial WM subadjacent to Broca's area and the superior temporal gyrus [STG], inferior longitudinal fasciculus [ILF], inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus [IFOF], and arcuate fasciculus) were autosegmented. We quantified volume and diffusion measures of WM microstructure: fractional anisotropy (FA; lower values indicate disruption) and mean diffusivity (MD; higher values indicate injury). Linear mixed-effects models assessed mean dose as predictor of imaging biomarker change and imaging biomarkers as longitudinal predictors of language scores. RESULTS: DKEFS-CF scores declined at 6 months post-RT (RCI-PE, -0.483; P = .01), whereas BNT scores improved (RCI-PE, 0.262; P = .04). Higher mean dose to left and right regions was predictive of decreased volume (left-STG, P = .02; right-ILF and IFOF, P = .03), decreased FA (left-WM tracts, all P < .01; right-STG and IFOF, P < .02), and increased MD of left-WM tracts (all P < .03). Volume loss within left-Broca's area (P = .01), left-ILF (P = .01), left-IFOF (P = .01), and left-arcuate fasciculus (P = .04) was associated with lower BNT scores. Lower FA correlated with poorer DKEFS-CF and BNT scores within left-ILF (P = .02, not significant), left-IFOF (P = .02, .04), and left-arcuate fasciculus (P = .01, .01), respectively. Poorer DKEFS-CF scores correlated with increased MD values within the left-arcuate fasciculus (P = .03). Right-sided biomarkers did not correlate with language scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary brain tumors experience language fluency decline post-RT. Poorer fluency and naming function may be explained by microstructural injury to left-sided perisylvian WM, representing potential dose-avoidance targets for language preservation.

Neuroendoscopic approach to tectal tumors: a consecutive series.

OBJECT: The authors report a consecutive series of 10 patients who presented with signs and symptoms caused by tectal tumors. Clinical findings, radiographic features, neuroendoscopic management strategies, and histological findings are reported and discussed. METHODS: Since January 1990, 11 neuroendoscopic procedures were performed in 10 patients who harbored tectal tumors. The patients were followed for an average of 5 years (range 2 months-11 years), and a retrospective study was conducted in which case notes, radiological findings, operative notes, and histopathological findings were assessed. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed, and the images were used to classify patients into three groups: those with hypertrophy of the tectum in whom isointensity appeared on T1-weighted images (Group 1); those with a tectal tumor occupying the cerebral aqueduct in whom decreased signal intensity appeared on T1-weighted images, as well as no enhancement after gadolinium administration (Group 2); and those with a tectal tumor in whom mixed signal intensity and conspicuous evidence of contrast enhancement appeared on T1-weighted images (Group 3). The results of histological examination were consistent with MR imaging features: in Group 1, glial tissue or gliosis; in Group 2, benign astrocytoma; and in Group 3, malignant astrocytoma. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion was the only surgical treatment that provided relief from obstructive hydrocephalus. One patient in Group 3 underwent radiotherapy and subsequent partial tumor removal under neuroendoscopic guidance. Thereafter, the tumor remained in decline. All patients had normal intellectual status after undergoing surgery in which a neuroendoscope was used. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendoscopic procedures can provide histological diagnosis, define the tumor-midbrain interrelationship, and be highly effective in treating obstructive hydrocephalus and in removing tectal tumors. This procedure may receive clinical application as a new management strategy for tectal glioma.