Aortic conduit aneurysm and enteric fistula formation in a post-liver transplant patient: A potential causative role for cytomegalovirus?

Hepatic arterial aortic conduits can be used as an alternative means of revascularizing the donor liver when the native recipient hepatic artery (HA) cannot be used. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common Herpesviridae infection in patients who have undergone solid organ transplants. It can be asymptomatic but may cause fever and invasive disease affecting any organ system. Here we describe the first case in the literature of an aortic conduit aneurysm and concurrent CMV viremia following liver transplantation. We speculate on a causative role for CMV in the development of the aneurysm.

Cytomegalovirus infection of bile duct epithelial cells, hepatic artery and portal venous endothelium in relation to chronic rejection of liver grafts.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Chronic rejection is an important cause of graft loss following liver transplantation. A number of risk factors for chronic rejection have been identified previously, albeit inconsistently. These include cytomegalovirus infection detected by a number of different techniques, including immunohistochemical staining and in situ hybridisation of liver grafts. However, tissue-based techniques for the detection of CMV have not been applied to grafts lost to conditions other than chronic rejection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the presence of cytomegalovirus infection detected by in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry with respect to graft outcome, the presence of cytomegalovirus infection detected by other techniques and in addition, the type of infected cell. METHODS: The 29 patients studied included 15 patients who lost their primary liver graft to chronic rejection in 8 cases, to hepatic artery thrombosis in 4 cases and to causes other than chronic rejection or hepatic artery thrombosis in 3 further cases. In each case, sections containing septal or large ducts and vessels were selected (usually blocks) since these may be more representative. Needle biopsies from 14 further patients who ultimately achieved satisfactory graft function served as control tissue. Of these, ten had evidence of cytomegalovirus infection at the time of study by serum/urine PCR, DEAFF testing or seroconversion, while 4 patients had no evidence of cytomegalovirus infection according to these techniques. RESULTS: Cytomegalovirus infection was detected in the liver of 12 of the 29 patients. These included 8/15 grafts lost, which comprised 3/8 with chronic rejection, 2/3 with hepatic artery thrombosis and 3/4 with grafts lost to other causes, as well as 4/14 who retained grafts. CMV was detected most commonly in association with symptomatic infection and notably was detected only by in situ hybridisation in two cases. Predominant cell types that contained cytomegalovirus were hepatocytes and mononuclear cells. However, bile duct epithelial cells, hepatic artery endothelial cells and portal venous endothelial cells also contained cytomegalovirus in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: These data support previous studies that cytomegalovirus infection is detectable in patients with chronic rejection and are consistent with the theory that CMV is involved in chronic rejection. However, cytomegalovirus infection was detected in explanted grafts lost to conditions other than chronic rejection, and the association may not be causal but a consequence of graft injury.

Cytomegalovirus and its association with hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a cause of morbidity and graft loss in approximately 7% of patients after an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although technical problems are often thought to be the cause of HAT, in general the etiology remains unclear. Because cytomegalovirus (CMV) can infect endothelial cells in vitro and lead to a rapid procoagulant response, it can be hypothesized that, in the absence of CMV antibodies, latent CMV in an allograft may become activated and promote or contribute to vascular thrombosis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between CMV serology of the donor and recipient with the development of HAT after OLT. METHODS: Between July 1988 and November 1995 (University of Wisconsin era), 490 OLTs were performed in 413 patients. Subsequently, four patients were excluded in whom the CMV serology results of the donor were not available. Sixteen of the 409 patients developed HAT within 30 days after liver transplantation. The control group consisted of the other 393 patients. RESULTS: The incidence of HAT was 12.5% in 64 CMV D+R- patients and 0% in 52 CMV D-R- patients. However, in the other combinations (D+R+ and D-R+), the incidence was only 2.8% (P = 0.005). Eight of the 16 patients with HAT belonged to the CMV D+R- group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CMV-seronegative patients receiving a seropositive allograft may be at risk for early HAT. Seropositivity of the donor alone and of the recipient alone was not significantly related to the incidence of HAT. Prophylactic treatment with ganciclovir and/or anticoagulation should be evaluated to prevent this complication.