Efficacy of Cooled-Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerve as Treatment for Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is one of the leading causes of reduced quality of life in the USA, with knee pain commonly reported. Multiple therapeutic modalities are traditionally utilized for pain management; however, some patients may have pain refractory to these techniques. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA) of the geniculate nerve is a growing and promising therapy offering a potentially long-term solution to chronic knee pain. METHODS: This study assessed the efficacy, average duration of relief, and potential adverse events using a retrospective chart review of 406 procedures. A two-tailed paired t test was used to assess the statistical significance between pre-RFA vs. post-RFA visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores self-reported by patients. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to evaluate for statistical differences in pre-RFA pain scores and post-RFA pain scores among the categories of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis group. RESULTS: The mean percent in pain improvement calculated was 65.5% with an average duration of relief of 7.20 months. The average pre-RFA pain score on the VAS was 6.26 out of 10 and 2.59 out of 10 post-RFA. The ANOVA post-RFA pain scores demonstrated statistically significant differences among the categories of age and sex. A total of 54 adverse events were reported, including worsening pain, numbness, paresthesia, and knee swelling. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that c-RFA can potentially be utilized as an alternative safe therapy for chronic knee pain, providing pain relief with a relatively prolonged duration. Inherent challenges of retrospective studies remain a part of the limitations of this study.

Superior Pain Reduction with Anteromedialization Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Versus Non-Operative Management for Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with patellofemoral osteoar-thritis (PFOA) treated non-operatively with those treated operatively with an unloading anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with isolated PFOA who were either managed non-operatively or surgically with a TTO and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were surveyed with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), Anterior Knee Pain scale (Kujala), and Tegner Activity scale. Statistical analysis included two-sample t-testing, one-way ANOVA, and bivariate analysis. RESULTS: The clinical outcomes of 49 non-operatively managed patients (mean age: 52.7 ± 11.3 years; mean follow-up: 1.7 ± 1.0 years) and 35 operatively managed patients (mean age: 31.8 ± 9.4 years; mean follow-up: 3.5 ± 1.7 years) were assessed. The mean VAS improved sig-nificantly in both groups [6.12 to 4.22 (non-operative), p < 0.0001; 6.94 to 2.45 (TTO); p < 0.0001], with operatively treated patients having significantly lower postoperative pain than non-operatively managed patients at the time of final follow-up [2.45 (TTO) vs. 4.22 (non-operative), p < 0.001]. The mean KOOS-JR score was significantly greater in the operative group at time of final follow-up [78.7 ± 11.6 (TTO) vs. 71.7 ± 17.8 (non-operative), p = 0.035]. There was no significant difference in Kujala or Tegner scores between the treatment groups. Additionally, there was no sig-nificant relationship between the number of intra-articular injections, duration of NSAID use, and number of physical therapy sessions on clinical outcomes in the non-operatively treated group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An unloading anteromedialization TTO provides significantly better pain relief and restoration of function compared to non-operative management in the treatment of symptomatic PFOA.

Thrombosed Persistent Median Artery with Coexisting Bifid Median Nerve in a Robotic Arthroplasty Surgeon: A Case Report.

CASE: A 47-year-old orthopaedic surgeon presented with acute volar left wrist pain. He performed over 250 robot-assisted knee arthroplasties each year. Color Doppler evaluation revealed bilateral persistent median arteries and bifid median nerves, with focal occlusive thrombosis of the left median artery. He was advised rest and oral aspirin. He could return to his professional activities after 1 month. He had no recurrence of symptoms at 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic surgeons use vibrating hand tools on a daily basis. The possibility of hand-arm vibration syndrome must be considered in the differential diagnosis of wrist pain among orthopaedic surgeons.

The Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Os Trigonum Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: A symptomatic os trigonum is a common cause of posterior ankle pain that has been traditionally managed with open excision. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been proposed as an alternative to open excision for improved outcomes and decreased complication rates; however, no systematic review to date has examined the utilization of MIS for a symptomatic os trigonum. PURPOSE: To examine patient outcomes, return to sport, and complications associated with MIS for a symptomatic os trigonum. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on February 22, 2023, using the PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases from database inception until February 22, 2023, on the topic of MIS for a symptomatic os trigonum. RESULTS: Of 885 articles retrieved from an initial search, 17 articles (N = 435 patients) met full inclusion criteria. The mean age of the cohort was 26.01 ± 4.68 years, with a mean follow-up time of 34.63 ± 18.20 months. For patients treated with MIS, the mean preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 55.85 ± 12.75, the mean final postoperative AOFAS score was 94.88 ± 4.04, the mean preoperative visual analog scale pain score was 7.20 ± 0.43, and the mean final postoperative visual analog scale score was 0.71 ± 0.48. The mean time to return to sport for patients undergoing MIS was 7.76 ± 1.42 weeks. MIS had an overall complication rate of 5.0%, the majority of which consisted of transient neurapraxia of the sural or superficial peroneal nerve. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive management of a symptomatic os trigonum appears to be a viable alternative to open surgery in terms of outcomes, return to sport, and complication rates. More high-quality evidence will be required to definitely recommend minimally invasive approaches as the standard of care over open surgery.

Long-term results of a modified Spitzy shelf operation for hip dysplasia: 79 adults with a mean follow-up of 33 years.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia in adolescents and adults. Most previous studies have insufficient follow-up time. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of a modified Spitzy shelf procedure. METHODS: We reviewed 79 adults with 94 acetabular shelf operations between 1976 and 2000. Mean age at surgery was 33.7 years (range 13-54). Indication for surgery was acetabular dysplasia with or without hip pain. Outcome was evaluated using hip pain pre- and postoperatively and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with conversion to total hip replacement (THR) as the endpoint. RESULTS: Hip pain was reported in 84% of the hips preoperatively and in 21% one year postoperatively. 63 hips (65%) had undergone THR at a mean patient age of 54.3 years (range 29-76). The mean survival time from Spitzy operation to THR was 17.2 years (range 1-39). Survival was 86% at 10-year follow-up, 56% at 20-year follow-up, and 36% at 30-year follow-up. Predictors of THR were age at surgery ≥ 30 years and preoperative osteoarthritis (OA). The rate of complications was 12%, but most were mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Spitzy shelf operation had a good effect on hip pain. The long-term survival with conversion to THR as the endpoint in hips without preoperative OA was similar to that reported after periacetabular osteotomy. This indicates that the shelf procedure may be a suitable option in adolescents and young adults with milder degrees of hip dysplasia without OA.

Small Joint Denervation of the Hand and Thumb Base: History, Anatomy, Technique, and Outcomes.

Painful arthritis of the small joints of the hand is a common condition affecting older adults, with distal interphalangeal joint and thumb carpometacarpal joint being the two most common locations. Younger adults may also develop painful arthritis after trauma and with inflammatory arthropathy. Traditional surgical approaches address the structure of the joints with either arthrodesis or arthroplasty with or without an implant. In recent decades, denervation has been reported as an alternative treatment for painful small joints that are mobile and stable. Publications on denervation often report faster surgery and recovery times than traditional surgeries that manipulate the small joint bony structures. This article reviews the history, anatomy, surgical techniques, and outcomes of denervation of the small joints of the hand.

Rehabilitation of the painful elbow.

Although lateral elbow pain and medial ulnar collateral ligament injury are common musculoskeletal pathologies in overhead athletes, the evidence supporting specific interventions for managing these conditions is scarce. Management of these conditions has been guided mostly by expert opinion rather than empirical evidence, yet the lack of comparative data in the literature has not negatively affected return-to-play rates following surgery. However, an understanding of what is known regarding unimodal and multimodal treatments for lateral elbow pain and medial ulnar collateral ligament injury is needed for clinicians to select evidence-based treatment pathways and highlight what is not known to develop future high-quality investigations.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation versus standard medical management for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a multicenter, randomized comparative effectiveness study.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide, with sacroiliac joint pain comprising up to 30% of cases of axial lower back pain. Conservative therapies provide only modest relief. Although placebo-controlled trials show efficacy for sacral lateral branch cooled radiofrequency ablation, there are no comparative effectiveness studies. METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter comparative effectiveness study, 210 patients with clinically suspected sacroiliac joint pain who obtained short-term benefit from diagnostic sacroiliac joint injections and prognostic lateral branch blocks were randomly assigned to receive cooled radiofrequency ablation of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-S3 lateral branches or standard medical management consisting of pharmacotherapy, injections and integrative therapies. The primary outcome measure was mean reduction in low back pain score on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life and function. RESULTS: 3 months post-treatment, the mean Numeric Rating Scale pain score for the cooled radiofrequency ablation group was 3.8±2.4 (mean reduction 2.5±2.5) compared with 5.9±1.7 (mean reduction 0.4±1.7) in the standard medical management group (p<0.0001). 52.3% of subjects in the cooled radiofrequency ablation group experienced >2 points or 30% pain relief and were deemed responders versus 4.3% of standard medical management patients (p<0.0001). Comparable improvements favoring cooled radiofrequency ablation were noted in Oswestry Disability Index score (mean 29.7±15.2 vs 41.5+13.6; p<0.0001) and quality of life (mean EuroQoL-5 score 0.68±0.22 vs 0.47±0.29; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sacroiliac joint pain, cooled radiofrequency ablation provided statistically superior improvements across the spectrum of patient outcomes compared with standard medical management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03601949.

Pain, function and quality of life are impaired in adults undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hip dysplasia is a common condition in active adults with hip pain that can lead to joint degeneration. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a common surgical treatment for hip dysplasia. The effect of this surgery on pain, function and quality of life (QOL) has not been systematically analysed. PURPOSE: In adults with hip dysplasia: (1) evaluate differences in pain, function and QOL in those undergoing PAO and healthy controls; (2) evaluate pre- to post-PAO changes in pain, function and QOL; (3) evaluate differences in pain, function and QOL in those with mild versus severe dysplasia, undergoing PAO; and (4) evaluate differences in pain, function and QOL in those having primary PAO versus those with previous hip arthroscopy. METHODS: A comprehensive, reproducible search strategy was performed on 5 different databases. We included studies that assessed pain, function and QOL in adults undergoing PAO for hip dysplasia, using hip-specific patient reported outcomes measures. RESULTS: From 5017 titles and abstracts screened, 62 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed PAO patients had worse outcomes pre- and post-PAO compared to healthy participants. Specifically, pain (standardised mean difference [SMD] 95% confidence interval [CI]): -4.05; -4.78 to -3.32), function (-2.81; -3.89 to -1.74), and QOL (-4.10; -4.43 to -3.77) were significantly poorer preoperatively.Meta-analysis found patients experienced improvements following PAO. Pain improved from pre-surgery to 1-year (standardised paired difference [SPD] 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67) and 2 years postoperatively (1.35; 1.16-1.54). For function, the activities of daily living scores at 1 year (1.22; 1.09-1.35) and 2 years (1.06; 0.9-1.22) and QOL at 1 year (1.36; 1.22-1.5) and 2 years (1.3; 1.1-1.5) all improved. No difference was found between patients undergoing PAO with mild versus severe dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Before undergoing PAO surgery, adults with hip dysplasia have worse levels of pain, function and QOL compared to healthy participants. These levels improve following PAO, but do not reach the same level as their healthy participants. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020144748).

5. Sacroiliac joint pain.

INTRODUCTION: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is defined as pain localized in the anatomical region of the SI joint. The reported prevalence of SI joint pain among patients with mechanical low back pain varies between 15% and 30%. METHODS: In this narrative review, the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of SI joint pain was updated and summarized. RESULTS: Patient's history provides clues on the source of pain. The specificity and sensitivity of provocative maneuvers are relatively high when three or more tests are positive, though recent studies have questioned the predictive value of single or even batteries of provocative tests. Medical imaging is indicated only to rule out red flags for potentially serious conditions. The diagnostic value of SI joint infiltration with local anesthetic remains controversial due to the potential for false-positive and false-negative results. Treatment of SI joint pain ideally consists of a multidisciplinary approach that includes conservative measures as first-line therapies (eg, pharmacological treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy, manual medicine, exercise therapy and rehabilitation treatment, and if necessary, psychological support). Intra- and extra-articular corticosteroid injections have been documented to produce pain relief for over 3 months in some people. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-3 (or 4) lateral branches has been shown to be efficacious in numerous studies, with extensive lesioning strategies (eg, cooled RFA) demonstrating the strongest evidence. The reported rate of complications for SI joint treatments is low. CONCLUSIONS: SI joint pain should ideally be managed in a multidisciplinary and multimodal manner. When conservative treatment fails, corticosteroid injections and radiofrequency treatment can be considered.

Is ulnar shortening osteotomy or the wafer procedure better for ulnar impaction syndrome?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Wrist pain on the ulnar side is often caused by ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). Idiopathic UIS requires surgical treatment when conservative treatment fails. The 2 main surgical procedures used are the wafer procedure and ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) of the metaphysis or diaphysis. This review aimed to analyze comparative studies of the 2 procedures in UIS to determine clinical outcomes and complications. METHODS: One prospective and 5 retrospective comparison trials were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes were treatment effectiveness; pain visual analog scale (VAS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Mayo wrist, and Darrow scores. The incidence of postoperative complications formed the secondary outcome. RESULTS: The selected studies included 107 patients who underwent the wafer procedure (G1) and 117 patients who underwent USO (G2). The wafer procedure had the benefits of less postoperative immobilization and an early return to work. However, there were no significant differences in the postoperative pain improvement and functional scores. All 6 studies reported high total complication rates and reoperation with USO. The most frequent complication was implant-related discomfort or irritation; subsequent plate removal was the most common reason for a secondary operation. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in pain improvement or the postoperative functional score between the groups. Nevertheless, postoperative complications were the major pitfalls of USO. As the specialized shortening system advances further, a high-level study will be necessary to determine the surgical option in UIS.

Progression of Osteoarthritis at Long-term Follow-up in Patients Treated for Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement With Hip Arthroscopy Compared With Nonsurgically Treated Patients.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain, especially in young patients. When left untreated, it has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for the onset or progression of osteoarthritis (OA) and has been identified as one of the main contributors leading to the need for total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a young age. While the short-term therapeutic potential of hip arthroscopy is widely recognized, little is known regarding its potential mid- to long-term preventive effect on the progression of hip OA. PURPOSE: To (1) report clinical outcomes of arthroscopically treated FAI syndrome with a minimum 5-year follow-up and compare the results to a cohort with FAI treated nonsurgically and (2) determine the influence of hip arthroscopy on the onset and progression of hip OA in patients diagnosed with FAI. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who had hip pain and were diagnosed with FAI were included. Exclusion criteria were (1) previous or concomitant hip surgery, (2) <5 years of follow-up, and (3) insufficient radiographs. Patients treated with hip arthroscopy were compared with a cohort of patients with FAI who were treated nonsurgically. Kaplan-Meier estimates of failure (defined as conversion to THA) were performed. Bivariate analysis and Cox regression were used to identify factors associated with inferior clinical and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 957 patients (650 female, 307 male; 1114 hips) (mean age, 28.03 ± 8.9 years [range, 6.5-41.0 years]) with FAI were included. A total of 132 hips underwent hip arthroscopy and 982 hips were nonoperatively treated. The mean follow-up was 12.5 ± 4.7 years (range, 5.0-23.4 years). At the final follow-up, the rate of OA progression was 26.5% in the operative group and 35.2% in the nonoperative cohort (P < .01). Conversion to THA was performed in 6.8% of the surgical patients and 10.5% of the initially nonsurgical patients (P = .19). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the risk of failure between the operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. Male sex, increased age at initial diagnosis, presence of cam morphology, and increased initial Tönnis grade were risk factors for failure (male sex: hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; P < .01; per year of increased age: HR, 1.1; P < .01; presence of cam: HR, 3.5; P < .01; per Tönnis grade: HR, 4.0; P < .01). CONCLUSION: At a mean follow-up of nearly 13 years, 7% of patients of the surgical group experienced progression to THA, compared with 11% of the nonoperative control group. While most of the operative group showed little to no OA at final follow-up, moderate OA (Tönnis grade 2) was present in 12% of the cohort compared with 22% of nonsurgical patients. Increased age at diagnosis, male sex, presence of a cam morphology, and presence of initial arthritic joint changes were found to be risk factors for failure. The results of this study demonstrated evidence for a preventive effect of hip arthroscopy on the development and progression of OA in young patients with FAI at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Efficacy of Cervical Facet Joint Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Multitined Cannula, a Technical Note, and Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cervical facet joint pain is a leading cause of pain and disability. In patients nonresponsive to conservative treatment, cervical facet radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown to be efficacious. However, the conventional RFA technique can be cumbersome. A novel RFA technique with a multitined cannula allows for a lateral approach and represents an attractive alternative option for cervical facet RFA. It offers a potentially shorter, less cumbersome procedure, with consequently less x-ray exposure and patient discomfort than the conventional cervical RFA. OBJECTIVES: To describe the novel RFA technique using the lateral approach with the multitined cannula at the cervical facet joints and to assess its efficacy in chronic cervical facet joint pain. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-center observational study. SETTING: Interventional Pain Management Center, Switzerland. METHODS: The aim of this study is to describe the RFA technique using the lateral approach with the multitined cannula at the cervical facet joints and to assess its efficacy in chronic cervical facet joint pain. Eligible adult patients with chronic (> 3 months) cervical facet joint pain refractory to conservative treatment and confirmed by dual positive medial branch blocks, received a fluoroscopic-guided cervical facet RFA treatment using the multitined cannula. The primary outcome was pain relief. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients reporting a >= 30% reduction of pain intensity 2 months after RFA, patient global impression of change (PGIC), need for pain medication, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: We included 26 patients. The patients showed a clinically meaningful and significant pain relief at 2 months after cervical facet RFA (mean Numeric Rating Scale of 7.5 [1.9] at baseline to 4.2 [2.4]) and 58% of the patients reported >= 30% reduction of pain. An improvement on the PGIC was reported by 88.2% of the patients. No severe side effects or complications were observed. LIMITATIONS: Key limitations of our study were the relatively small sample size, the lack of a control group, and a relatively short-term follow-up duration. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that cervical facet joint RFA using the novel technique with the multitined cannula results in significant pain reduction and improvement on the PGIC. While the conventional technique requires multiple ablations at each target level, the RFA with the multitined needle requires only a singular ablation, likely sparing time, radiation dose, discomfort, and costs. Our results merit consideration of replacement of the conventional technique with the novel technique using the multitined cannula. However, larger-scale clinical trials with an adequate long-term follow-up period are needed to prove the efficacy of RFA using the multitined cannula in cervical facet joint pain.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic knee joint pain: a real-world cohort study with evaluation of prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an effective treatment for chronic knee pain. However, there has been minimal investigation of real-world, long-term outcomes and factors that predict treatment success after GNRFA. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of GNRFA for chronic knee pain in a real-world population and identify predictive factors. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent GNRFA at a tertiary academic center were identified. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected from the medical record. Outcome data were numeric rating scale (NRS) pain reduction and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Data were collected by standardized telephone survey. Predictors of success were evaluated with logistic and Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 226 total patients identified, 134 (65.6 ± 12.7; 59.7% female) were successfully contacted and analyzed, with a mean follow-up time of 23.3 ± 11.0 months. Of those, 47.8% (n = 64; 95% CI: 39.5%-56.2%) and 61.2% (n = 82; 95% CI: 52.7%-69.0%) reported ≥50% NRS score reduction and ≥2-point NRS score reduction, respectively, and 59.0% (n = 79; 95% CI: 50.5%-66.9%) reported "much improved" on the PGIC questionnaire. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of treatment success (P < .05) were higher Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade (2-4 vs 0-1); no baseline opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted. CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort, approximately half of the participants experienced clinically meaningful improvements in knee pain after GNRFA at an average follow-up time of nearly 2 years. Factors associated with higher likelihood of treatment success were more advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2-4); no opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted.

Retrospective evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing sacroiliac joint denervation with simplicity.

OBJECTIVES: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is the third most common cause of low back pain. The treatment of SIJ-induced pain is often conservative. When conservative treatments fail, interventional treatment methods, such as intra-articular injection or radiofrequency (RF) denervation are applied. Recently, in addition to the success of this interventional treatment applied, increased patient satisfaction and quality of life after treatment have also gained importance. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate pain management and improvement in the quality of life in patients with SIJ pain who underwent RF denervation with the simplicity probe. METHODS: The files of patients with SIJ degeneration on Ferguson X-ray, who underwent diagnostic intra-articular block for SIJ and had more than 50% reduction in pain were screened, and 38 cases in which simplicity RF neurotomy was applied were identified. The age, sex, and numerical rating scale (NRS) and short form (SF)-36 scores of the remaining 30 patients were recorded before and at 6 months after the procedure. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in NRS between the pre-procedure and post-procedure (6-month) values. The decrease in NRS did not significantly differ according to sex. A statistically significant improvement in all the domains of SF-36 in the post-procedure period compared to the pre-procedure period. There was no significant sex-related difference in the improvement of the SF-36 domains, except for the emotional role functioning domain, for which the scores were significantly higher in women than in men. CONCLUSION: In patients with SIJ pain who positively respond to steroid injection, the application of Simplicity III achieves long-term pain management and increases patient comfort and satisfaction pain without any complications.

A comparison of pulsed radiofrequency and radiofrequency denervation for lumbar facet joint pain.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar facet joint pain is a common disorder. The main symptom is chronic lumbar pain, which can reduce quality of life. Radiofrequency has often been used to treat lumbar facet joint pain. However, the effectiveness of this technique has been controversial. This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and radiofrequency denervation (RD) for lumbar facet joint pain. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two patients with lumbar facet joint pain were allocated to two treatment groups: PRF group (N = 72) and RD group (N = 70). Patients enrolled in the study were assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire before therapy, 3 months and 12 months later. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in VAS, RMQ score, ODI score and SF-36 score at 3 months (p > 0.05). Significant differences in pain control were observed in both groups at 12 months (3.09 ± 1.72 vs. 2.37 ± 1.22, p = 0.006). There was a significant difference in RMQ score (11.58 ± 3.58 vs. 8.17 ± 2.34, p < 0.001) and ODI score (43.65 ± 11.01 vs. 35.42 ± 11.32, p < 0.001) at 12 months. The total SF-36 score was higher in the RD group than in the PRF group at 12 months (58.45 ± 6.97 vs. 69.36 ± 6.43, p < 0.001). In terms of complications, skin numbness occurred in three patients. Mild pain such as burning and pinking at the puncture site in two patients. One patient experienced a decrease in back muscle strength and back muscle fatigue. These complications disappeared in 3 weeks without any treatment. There were no serious adverse events in the PRF group. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with lumbar facet joint pain. RD could provide good and lasting pain relief, with significant improvement in lumbar function and quality of life at long-term follow-up.

Clinical Features Requiring Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to reveal the clinical features requiring sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthrodesis, which was performed for patients who complain of severe SIJ pain. METHODS: The differences in clinical features between a surgical treatment group (n=20) and a conservative treatment group (n=66) were investigated. All patients were definitively diagnosed with SIJ pain by the use of SIJ injections. RESULTS: Six significant features were identified in the surgical treatment group, namely, sitting tolerance (<15 minutes), walking with a cane, pain in the supine position, pain while lying on the painful side, numbness in the lower limbs, and any accident that induced SIJ pain (P<0.01). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that sitting tolerance <15 minutes (odds ratio : 31.73), pain in the supine position (13.07), and pain while lying on the painful side (18.30) showed a high odds ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Sitting tolerance (<15 minutes), walking with a cane, pain in the supine position, pain while lying on the painful side, numbness in the lower limbs, and a history of any accident that induced SIJ pain may be considered as indicators for surgery after >?6 months of continued substantial conservative treatment. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 123-128, February, 2023.

Ultrasound-guided lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for sacroiliac joint pain after lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery.

Our study evaluated the clinical feasibility of ultrasound-guided lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain after lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery (LSFS). This prospective study included a total of 46 patients who were diagnosed with SIJ pain after LSFS, did not respond to conservative treatment and therefore underwent ultrasound-guided SIJ radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) from January 2019 to January 2022. These patients were followed up for twelve months after the procedure. Patients were assessed with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preprocedural and postprocedural for 1 month, 6 months and 12 months follow-ups. There was a significant improvement in postprocedural NRS and ODI scores (p < 0.001). Thirty-eight patients (82.6%) had a satisfactory response and good global perceived effect (GPE) after twelve months. No significant complications were observed during the 12-month follow-up. The ultrasound-guided radiofrequency device designed as a safe, easily applied and encouraging method could avoid revision surgery. It is a promising technique and has shown good results in providing intermediate pain relief. In addition to the limited series reported in the literature, future studies will add meaning to this topic by including it in routine practice.

Ulnar Wrist Denervation: Articular Branching Pattern and Selective Blockade of the Dorsal Branch of the Ulnar Nerve.

PURPOSE: Ulnar wrist denervation has been a successful treatment for patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain. The purpose of this study was to characterize the articular branches of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve (DBUN) and validate a technique for selective peripheral nerve blockade. METHODS: In cadavers, we performed simulated local anesthetic injections using 0.5 mL of 0.5% methylene into the subcutaneous tissue at a point midway between the palpable borders of the pisiform and ulnar styloid. We then dissected the DBUN, characterized its articular branching pattern, and measured staining intensity of the DBUN and the ulnar nerve relative to a standard. RESULTS: The DBUN branched from the ulnar nerve 7.0 ± 1.2 cm proximal to the ulnar styloid. Among 17 specimens, the DBUN provided an average of 1.2 (range, 0-2) ulnocarpal branches and 1.0 (range, 0-2) carpometacarpal articular branches. A simulated local anesthetic injection successfully stained 100% of the DBUN articular branches at or proximal to their takeoff. There was no staining of the proper ulnar nerves. In all specimens, the DBUN supplied at least one articular branch. CONCLUSIONS: A point midway between the palpable border of the pisiform and ulnar styloid may be an effective location for selectively blocking the DBUN articular afferents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this study, we were able to identify a point halfway between the pisiform and ulnar styloid that has the potential to produce a selective peripheral nerve block of the portion of the DBUN that supplies articular fibers to the ulnocarpal joint and the fifth carpometacarpal joint. This technique may prove useful to surgeons treating ulnar-sided wrist pain.