Feasibility, reliability and validity of self-measurement of knee range-of-motion using an accelerometer-based smartphone application by patients with total knee arthroplasty.

AIMS: Limited knee range-of-motion (ROM) is common following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is associated with functional limitations and patient dissatisfaction. Regular knee ROM assessment is important but accurate testing traditionally requires timely access to trained healthcare professionals. Although accelerometer-based smartphone goniometry has shown to provide reliable and valid joint angles, current evidence of its use still positions healthcare providers as end users instead of patients themselves. Therefore, to maximize the impact of smartphone goniometry on post-TKA care, our study aimed to examine the feasibility, reliability, and validity of patients' self-measurement of knee ROM using an accelerometer-based smartphone goniometry application. METHODS: Patients were given standard instructions with a practice trial before the actual measurements. Passive knee flexion and extension ROM was measured on 2 sessions in 30 patients with TKA using 4 block-randomized methods: (i) smartphone self-assessment, (ii) long-arm goniometry by physiotherapist, (iii) smartphone assessment by physiotherapist, and (iv) extendable-arm goniometry by physiotherapist with placement adjudication. Feasibility was assessed by the number of participants who could independently perform the self-measurement. To assess intra- and inter-session reliability, we computed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) from random-effects models. To assess intra- and inter-session agreement, we computed mean absolute differences (MADs) and minimum detectable change (MDC). To assess concurrent validity, we designated extendable-arm goniometry as the "gold standard" and compared other methods against it using ICCs and MADs. RESULTS: All patients were able to comprehend and execute the assessment. 87% (n = 26) found the application easy to administer. Smartphone goniometry by patients showed excellent intra- and inter-session reliability (ICCs>0.97) and minimum variability (MAD = 0.9°-3.9°; MDC95 = 3.1°-9.0°). Smartphone or long-arm goniometry by physiotherapists did not outperform patients' self-assessment (ICC = 0.96-0.99, MAD = 0.7°-3.1°; MDC95 = 2.2°-8.0°). Compared against extendable-arm goniometry, smartphone goniometry by patients measured knee flexion and extension ROM with a MAD of 4.5° (ICC, 0.97) and 2.2° (ICC = 0.98), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that smartphone goniometry is feasible, reliable and accurate, and can be used with confidence in the self-assessment of knee ROM post-TKA. Future studies should further explore its utility in telemonitored rehabilitation, and its possible integration into mobile health applications to enhance accessibility to care following TKA.

The optimal measurement method considering reliability and validity in the anterior knee laxity of anterior cruciate ligament tears.

INTRODUCTION: To seek an optimal measurement method with high reliability and high validity for evaluation of the anterior knee laxity on stress radiographs and comparing the translation values to those of KT-2000 arthrometer. METHODS: Anterior knee laxity in 77 patients was measured preoperatively using the TelosTM and the KT-2000 arthrometer. Side-to-side difference measurements were taken using three conventional measuring methods and one proposed method (Modified Lateral). The knee position on the stress radiograph was evaluated and scored based on the stress radiograph qualifying criteria depending on stress film correctiveness. Intraclass correlation coefficients were analyzed to evaluate the reliability of the measurement methods and were compared between high (Group H) and low (Group L) radiograph quality score groups for each method. Validity was assessed by comparing the KT-2000 and the TelosTM using Pearson correlation (r value). RESULTS: The Modified Lateral method showed the best Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), followed by Center to Center, and Medial to Medial and Lateral to Lateral methods without considering the quality of Telos. In the comparison between groups based on Telos quality for intra-rater reliability, the Medial to Medial (MM) method demonstrated the best reliability in both groups (MM: ICCs, Group H = 0.942, Group L = 0.917, P = 0.693). As for inter-rater reliability, the Modified Lateral (ML) method exhibited the best reliability in both groups (ML: ICCs, Group H = 0.923, Group L = 0.882, P = 0.547). The value measured using the ML method in Telos showed the highest correlation coefficient with the KT-2000 measured value in both groups H and L. There were no statistically significant differences among the correlation coefficient values. CONCLUSION: The Modified Lateral method is recommended for its high reliability, taking into account the differences in bilateral knee positions and anatomical discriminability on stress radiographs when evaluating anterior knee translation with Telos. It also best reflected the KT-2000 arthrometer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series, Level IV.

Goniometry and fleximetry measurements to assess cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain: a validity and reliability study.

PURPOSE: To assess the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of goniometry and fleximetry in measuring cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain. METHODS: A reliability study. Thirty individuals with chronic neck pain were selected. Cervical range of motion was measured by goniometry and fleximetry at two time points 7 days apart. To characterize the sample, we used the numerical pain rating scale, Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale, and Neck Disability Index. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Correlations between goniometry and fleximetry measurements were performed using Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho). RESULTS: For goniometry, we found excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.986, SEM ≤ 1.89%, MDC ≤ 5.23%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.947, SEM ≤ 3.91%, MDC ≤ 10.84%). Similarly, we found excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.969, SEM ≤ 2.71%, MDC ≤ 7.52%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.981, SEM ≤ 1.88%, MDC ≤ 5.20%) for fleximetry. Finally, we observed a strong correlation between the goniometry and the fleximetry for all cervical movements (rho ≥ 0.993). CONCLUSION: Goniometry and fleximetry measurements are reliable for assessing cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Validity and reliability of a finger training tool for assessing metacarpal phalangeal joint ranges of motion in asymptomatic participants.

This pilot study aims to evaluate concurrent validity using the goniometer as a reference tool and test-retest reliability of flexion of metacarpal phalangeal joint (MCP) measurements taken from a finger training device (air-guitar system) in healthy participants. There were ten self -reported asymptomatic participants recruited to test the devices. The measurements of all metacarpophangeal joints of the dominant hands were conducted using a finger goniometer and the air-guitar system. Two measuring sessions were conducted on the same day. The concurrent validity of the air-guitar indicated by strong concordance correlation coefficient (0.62-0.90) with the goniometer and mean difference (approximately 1°) between the two instruments are well below the limit of 5°. The test-retest reliability of MCP measurements from the air-guitar glove (0.82-0.99) was acceptable as a clinically meaningful measurement tool as the intraclass correlation coefficients were higher than 0.7. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the air-guitar are similar to those of the goniometer. The air-guitar tracking features, when used as a home-based therapy tool, may assist in monitoring change of MCP flexion over a time course with good reliability and strongly associated with the measurements from the goniometer.

Inter-rater reliability in performing stifle goniometry in normal and cranial cruciate ligament disease affected dogs: a prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Goniometry can be performed clinically in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease (CCLD). The purpose of this study was (1) to compare reliability of stifle goniometry in dogs with CCLD and healthy dogs and (2) to investigate the effect of compliance on measurements. Dogs presented for surgical intervention for CCLD (CCL-Dogs; n = 15) and orthopedically healthy dogs (C-Dogs; n = 11) were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. In each dog, three observers randomly measured maximum stifle flexion (mSF) and maximum stifle extension (mSE) three times with a standard goniometer with the scale covered, while dog compliance was scored (Scores: C0: excellent - C4: poor). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for intra-/interobserver reliability. Effects on measurements were evaluated with mixed-effect models (MEM). RESULTS: Maximum stifle extension and mSE-compliance were significantly decreased in CCL-Dogs compared to C-Dogs (p ≤ 0.004), but mSF and mSF-compliance did not differ between groups. Intraobserver reliability was excellent for all dogs during mSE (ICC:0.75-0.99) and mSF (ICC:0.89-0.99). Interobserver reliability was excellent for mSF in both groups (ICC: C-Dogs:0.84, CCL-Dogs:0.9) and for mSE in CCL-Dogs (ICC:0.94) but only fair for mSE in C-Dogs (ICC:0.58). Robust MEM showed that the combined average of all mSE measurements of all three observers was affected by compliance in both groups (p < 0.001). This effect was not observed for single mSE-measurements by themselves. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that compliance may affect goniometric stifle extension measurements in healthy and CCLD dogs. In a clinical setting, intra-/interobserver reliability was excellent for all measurements except for maximum stifle extension in healthy dogs.

Hybridized deep learning goniometry for improved precision in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Generalized Joint Hyper-mobility (GJH) can aid in the diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), a complex genetic connective tissue disorder with clinical features that can mimic other disease processes. Our study focuses on developing a unique image-based goniometry system, the HybridPoseNet, which utilizes a hybrid deep learning model. OBJECTIVE: The proposed model is designed to provide the most accurate joint angle measurements in EDS appraisals. Using a hybrid of CNNs and HyperLSTMs in the pose estimation module of HybridPoseNet offers superior generalization and time consistency properties, setting it apart from existing complex libraries. METHODOLOGY: HybridPoseNet integrates the spatial pattern recognition prowess of MobileNet-V2 with the sequential data processing capability of HyperLSTM units. The system captures the dynamic nature of joint motion by creating a model that learns from individual frames and the sequence of movements. The CNN module of HybridPoseNet was trained on a large and diverse data set before the fine-tuning of video data involving 50 individuals visiting the EDS clinic, focusing on joints that can hyperextend. HyperLSTMs have been incorporated in video frames to avoid any time breakage in joint angle estimation in consecutive frames. The model performance was evaluated using Spearman's coefficient correlation versus manual goniometry measurements, as well as by the human labeling of joint position, the second validation step. OUTCOME: Preliminary findings demonstrate HybridPoseNet achieving a remarkable correlation with manual Goniometric measurements: thumb (rho = 0.847), elbows (rho = 0.822), knees (rho = 0.839), and fifth fingers (rho = 0.896), indicating that the newest model is considerably better. The model manifested a consistent performance in all joint assessments, hence not requiring selecting a variety of pose-measuring libraries for every joint. The presentation of HybridPoseNet contributes to achieving a combined and normalized approach to reviewing the mobility of joints, which has an overall enhancement of approximately 20% in accuracy compared to the regular pose estimation libraries. This innovation is very valuable to the field of medical diagnostics of connective tissue diseases and a vast improvement to its understanding.

Inclinometers and Apps Are Better than Goniometers, Measuring Knee Extension Range of Motion in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Patients: Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change for the Three Devices.

Knee extension range of motion (ROM) measurement is important in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The main objective is to evaluate the reliability and the minimal detectable change (MDC) of three methods of measuring knee extension ROM in ACL patients. The three common goniometric devices were a universal goniometer, an inclinometer, and a smartphone app. During a single-visit, knee extension ROM was measured in both knees of 92 ACL-injured or -reconstructed patients by two testers blinded to the other's measures. Intrarater, interrater, and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) were calculated. Intrarater ICC2,1 was excellent for the three devices ranging from 0.92 to 0.94, with the inclinometer yielding the best results (ICC2,1 = 0.94 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.91-0.96]). Interrater ICC2,1, however, varied from 0.36 to 0.80. The inclinometer and the smartphone app yielded similar results 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86), respectively, whereas the universal goniometer was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.17-0.53). Test-retest ICC2,1 for the inclinometer was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.93), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91) for the app, and 0.83 (95% CI:0.74-0.89) for the goniometer. The intrarater, interrater, and test-retest MDC95 values ranged from 2.0 to 3.5, 3.7 to 10.4, and 2.6 to 5.4 degrees, respectively. The goniometer was the least reliable. The inclinometer is the recommended device due to its highest ICC scores among the three devices and ease of use.

A High Grade of Postoperative Knee Laxity Is Associated With an Increased Hazard of Revision Surgery: A Cohort Study of 4697 Patients With Primary ACL Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is still debate regarding the association between arthrometric knee laxity measurements and subjective knee outcome and revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE: To assess whether arthrometric knee laxity (measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with the 1-, 2-, and 5-year subjective knee outcomes or revision ACLR at a 5-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study, Level of evidence 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft at the authors' institution between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, with no concomitant ligamentous injuries, were identified. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer, 134 N) was assessed 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Patients who underwent revision ACLR at any institution in the country within 5 years of primary surgery were identified through the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. RESULTS: A total of 4697 patients (54.3% male) with available KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were included (normal: side-to-side [STS] ≤2 mm, 3015 [64.2%]; nearly normal: STS 3-5 mm, 1446 [30.8%]; abnormal: STS >5 mm, 236 [5.0%]). The only significant difference in subjective knee outcome between the groups was for the KOOS Symptoms subscale at the 1-year follow-up (STS ≤2 mm, 79.9 ± 16.2; STS 3-5 mm, 82.5 ± 14.8; STS >5 mm, 85.1 ± 14.2; P < .001). No other significant differences between the groups were found preoperatively or at 1, 2, or 5 years postoperatively for any of the KOOS subscales. The hazard for revision ACLR within 5 years of the primary surgery was significantly higher for the groups with an STS of 3 to 5 mm (6.6%; 95/1446) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07-1.87; P = .01) and an STS >5 mm (11.4%; 27/236) (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.69-4.03; P < .001) compared with the group with an STS ≤2 mm (3.8%; 116/3015). CONCLUSION: A high grade of postoperative knee laxity (STS 3-5 mm and STS >5 mm) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with an increased hazard of revision ACLR within 5 years, but it was not associated with an inferior subjective knee outcome.

Reliability and validity of the medial standing overhead arm reach (SOAR) test as a measure of functional hip adduction motion.

OBJECTIVE: The Posterior Standing Overhead Arm Reach (SOAR) test has been previously reported as a reliable clinical measure of closed chain hip extension motion. The proposed Medial SOAR test expands on that testing approach to provide a similar measure of functional hip adduction motion. This was a preliminary intrarater and interrater reliability and validity study of the Medial SOAR test as a measure of functional hip adduction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: University motion analysis laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty hips were assessed in 25 (22 female) asymptomatic participants (mean age = 23.4 years, SD = 0.8). MAIN MEASURES: Maximum hip adduction during the Medial SOAR test was measured with a standard goniometer independently by two examiners. The test was also performed using three-dimensional motion capture. The intrarater and interrater reliability of the goniometric measure was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients, and the relationship between measures obtained via goniometry and three-dimensional motion capture was assessed with Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability (ICC2,3) was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80-0.92) for Examiner 1 and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.79-0.92) for Examiner 2. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were less than 3.0°. Interrater reliability demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.62 (95% CI = 0.28-0.79). Pearson correlations were significant with low-to-moderate associations (r = 0.49, P < 0.001; r = 0.24, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the previously reported Posterior SOAR test, the Medial SOAR test demonstrated acceptable intrarater and interrater reliability, along with low-to-moderate associations with three-dimensional motion capture. The Medial SOAR test has the potential to provide a reliable and accurate assessment of closed chain hip adduction.

Reliability and clinical utility of a novel telehealth-based goniometry approach to measure range of motion of the digits of the hand.

BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) is an outcome measure commonly used when treating acute and chronic hand injuries and conditions. Increased adoption of telehealth service provision in hand therapy practice, influenced by the advent of COVID-19, has led to the need for a valid and reliable approach to measure the range of motion of the digits of the hand when providing hand therapy services using telehealth. PURPOSE: To determine if performing manual goniometry during a livestream teleconsultation is reliable and clinically useful to measure the range of motion of the fifth digit when providing hand therapy services using telehealth. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement, repeated-measures study. METHODS: According to a measurement protocol, 12 independent raters (who currently provide hand therapy services) each obtained several screen-based goniometric range of motion measurements of the fifth digit at 2-time points. Raters were surveyed on the clinical utility of the telehealth-based goniometry approach. Measures of relative and absolute reliability were calculated to evaluate test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Free-text responses were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all flexion and extension measures (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.89) but poor for the arc of motion (ICC ≤ 0.67). Test-retest reliability was poor (ICC ≤ 0.43). No statistically significant differences between test and retest measurements were observed (P ≥ 0.24). The overall coefficient of variation indicated good precision (14.69%). Measurement error (≤6.07º) and limits of agreement (≤6.33) had acceptable levels to support clinical use. Content analysis revealed several practical considerations. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that performing manual goniometry during a livestream teleconsultation is unreliable for measuring the range of motion of the fifth digit. However, when combined with patient-reported and functional outcomes, this approach may be suitable to facilitate a range of motion assessment for certain functions of telehealth service provision in hand therapy practice.

Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units in Active Range of Motion Assessment in the Hip Joint.

Measuring joint range of motion has traditionally occurred with a universal goniometer, inclinometer, or expensive laboratory systems. The popularity of the inertial measurement unit (IMU) is growing, enabling the small and even single portable device to measure the range of motion. Until now, they were not used to assess hip joint range of motion. Our study aimed to check the validity of IMUs in assessing hip range of motion and compare them to other measurement devices-universal goniometer and inclinometer. Twenty participants completed three hip movements (flexion in standing and prone internal and external rotation) on both hips. Two testers independently assessed each movement with a goniometer, digital inclinometer, and IMU at different time points. To assess the agreement of active hip ROM between devices, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used. Furthermore, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were also assessed by using ICC and Bland-Altman analysis. Limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated using Bland-Altman plots. The IMU demonstrated good to excellent validity (ICC: 0.87-0.99) compared to the goniometer and digital inclinometer, with LOAs < 9°, across all tested movements. Intra-rater reliability was excellent for all devices (ICC: 0.87-0.99) with LOAs < 7°. However, inter-rater reliability was moderate for flexion (ICC: 0.58-0.59, LOAs < 22.4) and poor for rotations (ICC: -0.33-0.04, LOAs < 7.8°). The present study shows that a single inertial measurement unit (RSQ Motion, RSQ Technologies, Poznan, Poland) could be successfully used to assess the active hip range of motion in healthy subjects, comparable to other methods accuracy.

Analysis of the concurrent validity and reliability of five common clinical goniometric devices.

Measurement errors play an important role in the development of goniometric equipment, devices used to measure range of motion. Reasonable validity and reliability are critical for both the device and examiner before and after to testing in human subjects. The objective is to evaluate the concurrent validity and reliability of five different clinical goniometric devices for the purpose of establishing an acceptable measurement error margin for a novel device. We explored the validity and inter- and intrarater reliability scores of five goniometric devices namely (i) the universal goniometer (UG), a two-armed hand-held goniometer, (ii) the inclinometer (IC), featuring a single base, fluid level, and gravity-weighted inclinometer, (iii) the digital inclinometer (DI), functioning as both a DI and dynamometer, (iv) the smartphone application (SA), employing gyroscope-based technology within a smartphone platform application and (v) the modified inclinometer (MI), a gravity pendulum-based inclinometer equipped with a specialized fixing apparatus. Measurements were obtained at 12 standard angles and 8 human shoulder flexion angles ranging from 0° to 180°. Over two testing sessions, 120 standardized angle measurements and 160 shoulder angle measurements from 20 shoulders were repetitively taken by three examiners for each device. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated to assess reliability and validity. Concurrent validity was also evaluated through the execution of the 95% limit of agreement (95% LOA) and Bland-Altman plots, with comparisons made to the UG. The concurrent validity for all device pairs was excellent in both study phases (ICC > 0.99, 95% LOA - 4.11° to 4.04° for standard angles, and - 10.98° to 11.36° for human joint angles). Inter- and intrarater reliability scores for standard angles were excellent across all devices (ICC > 0.98, SEM 0.59°-1.75°, MDC 1°-4°), with DI showing superior reliability. For human joint angles, device reliability ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC 0.697-0.975, SEM 1.93°-4.64°, MDC 5°-11° for inter-rater reliability; ICC 0.660-0.996, SEM 0.77°-4.06°, MDC 2°-9° for intra-rater reliability), with SA demonstrating superior reliability. Wider angle measurement however resulted in reduced device reliability. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that it is essential to assess measurement errors independently for standard and human joint angles. The DI is the preferred reference for standard angle testing, while the SA is recommended for human joint angle testing. Separate evaluations across the complete 0°-180° range offer valuable insights.

A webcam-based machine learning approach for three-dimensional range of motion evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Joint range of motion (ROM) is an important quantitative measure for physical therapy. Commonly relying on a goniometer, accurate and reliable ROM measurement requires extensive training and practice. This, in turn, imposes a significant barrier for those who have limited in-person access to healthcare. OBJECTIVE: The current study presents and evaluates an alternative machine learning-based ROM evaluation method that could be remotely accessed via a webcam. METHODS: To evaluate its reliability, the ROM measurements for a diverse set of joints (neck, spine, and upper and lower extremities) derived using this method were compared to those obtained from a marker-based optical motion capture system. RESULTS: Data collected from 25 healthy adults demonstrated that the webcam solution exhibited high test-retest reliability, with substantial to almost perfect intraclass correlation coefficients for most joints. Compared with the marker-based system, the webcam-based system demonstrated substantial to almost perfect inter-rater reliability for some joints, and lower inter-rater reliability for other joints (e.g., shoulder flexion and elbow flexion), which could be attributed to the reduced sensitivity to joint locations at the apex of the movement. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed webcam-based method exhibited high test-retest and inter-rater reliability, making it a versatile alternative for existing ROM evaluation methods in clinical practice and the tele-implementation of physical therapy and rehabilitation.

The concurrent validity and reliability of virtual reality to measure shoulder flexion and scaption range of motion.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain commonly has a detrimental impact on patient's work and social activities. Although pain is the most common reason for seeking care, a reduction in shoulder range of motion (ROM) is another common impairment. ROM assessment is used as an evaluation tool and multiple methods are available to measure shoulder ROM. Virtual reality (VR) has been introduced into shoulder rehabilitation, mostly when exercise and ROM measurement is indicated. This study evaluated the concurrent validity and system reliability of active ROM measurements of VR for people with and without shoulder pain. METHODS: Forty volunteers participated in this study. Virtual goniometry was used to assess active shoulder ROM. Participants performed flexion and scaption to six predetermined angles. Measurements from the VR goniometer and smartphone inclinometers were recorded simultaneously. To assess reliability, two identical test sequences were performed. RESULTS: The concurrent validity ICCs were 0.93 for shoulder flexion and 0.94 for shoulder scaption. The VR goniometer application on average systematically overestimated the ROM compared to the smartphone inclinometer. The mean difference between goniometer values was -11.3 degrees for flexion and -10.9 for scaption. The system reliability was excellent with an overall ICC of 0.99 for the flexion movements and 0.99 for the scaption movements. CONCLUSION: Although the VR system demonstrated excellent reliability, and high ICC's for concurrent validity, the large range between the lower and upper 95% CI limits suggests it lacks measurement precision. This suggests VR, as used in this study, should not be used interchangeably with other measurement tools. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Measurement Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Goniometry of a Set of Acquired Images in Youths with Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the intra-rater repeatability and the inter-rater reproducibility of using a virtual goniometer to measure upper and lower extremity joint range of motion (ROM) in youths with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC). METHODS: Youths presenting with AMC aged 8 to 21 years old were recruited. ROM of the upper and lower limbs were assessed remotely during a teleassessment on a video-conferencing platform. Screen captures were taken and ROM were measured by two raters, two-weeks apart, using a virtual goniometer. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to assess intra-and inter-rater repeatability and reproducibility. RESULTS: Nine participants were included with a median age of 15.9 years (range: 11.3 to 20.8 years). The overall intra-rater ICC was 0.997 (95% CI:0.996 to 0.997) for the first rater and 0.993 (95% CI:0.992 to 0.994) for the second rater. The inter-rater ICC ranged from 0.410 (95% CI:-0.392; 0.753) for forearm pronation to 0.998 (95% CI:0.996; 0.999) for elbow flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current study suggest that virtual goniometry is reproducible and repeatable for the ROM of most joints. Future studies should evaluate procedural reliability and validity of the proposed method for youth with complex conditions.

Perfil Funcional e Clínico durante o Pré e o Pós-Cirúrgico de Pacientes Oncológicos de Cabeça e Pescoço / Pre and Post-Surgical Functional and Clinical Profile of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer / Perfil Funcional y Clínico durante el Período Pre y Post Quirúrgico de Pacientes con Cáncer de Cabeza y Cuello

Introdução: O câncer de cabeça e pescoço ocupa o sexto lugar das neoplasias mais predominantes no mundo. Pela localização anatômica, essas neoplasias podem promover alterações funcionais importantes, relacionadas à alimentação, respiração e comunicação, afetando a interação social. Objetivo: Caracterizar o perfil funcional e clínico de pacientes com neoplasias malignas de cabeça e pescoço. Método: Estudo transversal, descritivo, quali-quantitativo. Foram avaliadas a goniometria e a dinamometria dos membros superiores, e utilizados a Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale (ICUMS) para avaliar a mobilidade, o índice de performance de Karnofsky (KPS) e a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (PS-ECOG), em um hospital público terciário. A coleta ocorreu entre agosto e novembro de 2022. Resultados: Participaram do estudo 39 pacientes do sexo feminino (61,54%) com idade média de 51,51 anos (±16,05). Os fatores de risco mais comuns foram: histórico familiar (53,85%), incidência em Regiões com desigualdade de distribuição de renda (17,95%), em Ceilândia (Região Administrativa do Distrito Federal), e tendo concluído o apenas o ensino fundamental (48,72%). O tumor primário com maior prevalência foi o de tireoide (61,54%), estadiamento T4 (33,33%). No pós-cirúrgico, 10 apresentavam paralisia facial, 11, trismo, 27, escápula alada. A mobilidade no pós-operatório foi mantida durante a internação com ICUMS 10, KPS 90% e PS-ECOG 0-1. Conclusão: A predisposição e o perfil clínico e funcional se correlacionaram com os problemas respiratórios, trismo, paralisia facial, escápula alada e amplitude reduzida de membro superior, como as repercussões mais frequentes, possivelmente decorrentes do tumor ou do tratamento. Entretanto, a mobilidade e a performance pós-cirúrgica não sofreram alterações consideráveis.

Introduction: Head and neck cancer is the sixth most prevalent neoplasm in the world. Due to their anatomical location, these cancers can promote important functional changes related to eating, breathing and communication, affecting social interaction. Objective: To characterize the functional and clinical profile of patients with head and neck cancer. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive, quanti-qualitative study. Goniometry and dynamometry of the upper limbs, the Intensive Care Mobility Scale (ICUMS) to evaluate mobility, the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (PS-ECOG) were utilized in a tertiary public hospital. Data collection occurred between August and November 2022. Results: There were 39 female patients (61.54%) enrolled in the study with mean age of 51.51(±16.05). The most common risk factors were: family history (53.85%), incidence in social and economically underserved regions (17.95%), in Ceilândia (Administrative Region of the Federal District), and education up to elementary school (48.72%). The primary tumor with the highest prevalence was thyroid (61.54%), staging T4 (33.33%). In the postoperative period, 10 presented facial paralysis, 11, trismus and 27, winged scapula. Postoperative mobility was maintained during hospitalization with ICUMS 10, KPS 90% and PS-ECOG between 0-1. Conclusion: The predisposition and the clinical and functional profile were correlated with respiratory problems, trismus, facial paralysis, winged scapula and reduced upper limb amplitude, as the most frequent repercussions, possibly resulting from the tumor or the treatment. However, post-surgical mobility and performance did not change considerably.

Introducción: El cáncer de cabeza y cuello ocupa el sexto lugar de las neoplasias más prevalentes en el mundo. Por su ubicación anatómica, estos cánceres pueden promover cambios funcionales importantes relacionados con la alimentación, la respiración y la comunicación, afectando la interacción social. Objetivo: Caracterizar el perfil funcional y clínico de los pacientes con cáncer de cabeza y cuello. Método: Estudio transversal, descriptivo, cuali-cuantitativo. En un hospital público de tercer nivel se evaluó la goniometría y dinamometría de miembros superiores, utilizando la Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale (IUMS) para evaluar la movilidad, el índice de desempeño de Karnofsky (KPS) y la Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (PS-ECOG). La recolección de datos se realizó entre agosto y noviembre de 2022. Resultados: Participaron en el estudio 39 pacientes de sexo femenino (61,54%) con una edad promedio de 51,51 años (±16,05). Los factores de riesgo más comunes fueron: antecedentes familiares (53,85%), incidencia en regiones con distribución desigual de la renta (17,95%), en Ceilândia (Región Administrativa del Distrito Federal) y escolaridad hasta la enseñanza básica (48,72%). El tumor primario con mayor prevalencia fue el de tiroides (61,54%), categoría de estadificación T4 (33,33%). En el postoperatorio 10 presentaron parálisis facial, 11 trismo, 27 omóplato alado. La movilidad postoperatoria se mantuvo durante la hospitalización con ICUMS 10, KPS 90% y PS-ECOG 0-1. Conclusión: La predisposición y el perfil clínico y funcional se correlacionaron con los problemas respiratorios, trismo, parálisis facial, omóplato alado y la amplitud reducida del miembro superior como las más frecuentes repercusiones, posiblemente debidas al tumor o al tratamiento. Sin embargo, la movi

Reliability of a human pose tracking algorithm for measuring upper limb joints: comparison with photography-based goniometry.

BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) measurements are essential for diagnosing and evaluating upper extremity conditions. Clinical goniometry is the most commonly used methods but it is time-consuming and skill-demanding. Recent advances in human tracking algorithm suggest potential for automatic angle measuring from RGB images. It provides an attractive alternative for at-distance measuring. However, the reliability of this method has not been fully established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the results of algorithm are as reliable as human raters in upper limb movements. METHODS: Thirty healthy young adults (20 males, 10 females) participated in this study. Participants were asked to performed a 6-motion task including movement of shoulder, elbow and wrist. Images of movements were captured by commercial digital cameras. Each movement was measured by a pose tracking algorithm (OpenPose) and compared with the surgeon-measurement results. The mean differences between the two measurements were compared. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship. Reliability was investigated by the intra-class correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Comparing this algorithm-based method with manual measurement, the mean differences were less than 3 degrees in 5 motions (shoulder abduction: 0.51; shoulder elevation: 2.87; elbow flexion:0.38; elbow extension:0.65; wrist extension: 0.78) except wrist flexion. All the intra-class correlation coefficients were larger than 0.60. The Pearson coefficients also showed high correlations between the two measurements (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that pose estimation is a reliable method to measure the shoulder and elbow angles, supporting RGB images for measuring joint ROM. Our results presented the possibility that patients can assess their ROM by photos taken by a digital camera. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Clinical Trials Center of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (2021-387).

Development of Joint Activity Angle Measurement and Cloud Data Storage System.

In this study, we developed a range of motion sensing system (ROMSS) to simulate the function of the elbow joint, with errors less than 0.76 degrees and 0.87 degrees in static and dynamic verification by the swinging and angle recognition modules, respectively. In the simulation process, the É£ correlation coefficient of the Pearson difference between the ROMSS and the universal goniometer was 0.90, the standard deviations of the general goniometer measurements were between ±2 degrees and ±2.6 degrees, and the standard deviations between the ROMSS measurements were between ±0.5 degrees and ±1.6 degrees. With the ROMSS, a cloud database was also established; the data measured by the sensor could be uploaded to the cloud database in real-time to provide timely patient information for healthcare professionals. We also developed a mobile app for smartphones to enable patients and healthcare providers to easily trace the data in real-time. Historical data sets with joint activity angles could be retrieved to observe the progress or effectiveness of disease recovery so the quality of care could be properly assessed and maintained.