RESUMO
Despite the increase in utilization of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) throughout high-income countries, there is a lack of access to basic surgical care, including TJA, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Multiple strategies, including short-term surgical trips, establishment of local TJA centers, and education-based international academic collaborations, have been used to bridge the gap in access to quality TJA. The authors review the obstacles to providing TJA in LMICs, the outcomes of the 3 strategies in use to bridge gaps, and a framework for the establishment and maintenance of meaningful international collaborations.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição , Ortopedia , Osteoartrite/cirurgia , Artroplastia de Substituição/economia , Artroplastia de Substituição/educação , Artroplastia de Substituição/ética , Artroplastia de Substituição/normas , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Internacionalidade , Ortopedia/economia , Ortopedia/educação , Ortopedia/organização & administração , Ortopedia/normasAssuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/economia , Artroplastia de Substituição/ética , Ética Médica , Relações Hospital-Médico , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/ética , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/economia , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/ética , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/ética , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/ética , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Ética Clínica , Artropatias/cirurgia , Ortopedia/ética , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/ética , Artroplastia de Substituição/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Ortopedia/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
While all of medicine is under pressure to increase transparency and accountability, joint replacement subspecialists will face special scrutiny. Disclosures of questionable consulting fees, a demographic shift to younger patients, and uncertainty about the marginal benefits of product innovation in a time of great cost pressure invite a serious and progressive response from the profession. Current efforts to standardize measures by the National Quality Forum and PQRI will not address the concerns of purchasers, payors, or policy makers. Instead, they will ask the profession to document its commitment to appropriateness, stewardship of resources, coordination of care, and patient-centeredness. One mechanism for addressing these expectations is voluntary development of a uniform national registry for joint replacements that includes capture of preoperative appropriateness indicators, device monitoring information, revision rates, and structured postoperative patient followup. A national registry should support performance feedback and quality improvement activity, but it must also be designed to satisfy payor, purchaser, policymaker, and patient needs for information. Professional societies in orthopaedics should lead a collaborative process to develop metrics, infrastructure, and reporting formats that support continuous improvement and public accountability.