Supervisión de ensayos clínicos en hospitales del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú: enfoque administrativo y regulatorio / Supervision of clinical trials in Social Health Insurance at Peruvian Hospitals: administrative and regulatory approach

RESUMEN El objetivo del estudio fue describir las características de los ensayos clínicos (EC) supervisados por el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación en EsSalud entre el 2015 y 2018 y las principales observaciones de las supervisiones realizadas. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de 82 ensayos clínicos supervisados entre 2015 y 2018. La mayoría de los ensayos clínicos fueron estudios de fase III (81,7%), la vía de administración más frecuente de los productos de estudio fue oral (47,6%) y la mayoría fueron patrocinados por la industria farmacéutica (96,3%). Las observaciones más frecuentes fueron las relacionadas al contrato de estudio (83,8%), al pago por concepto de overhead (57,3%) y a la falta de documentos regulatorios (47,6%). Estos hallazgos permiten la identificación de oportunidades de mejora en la regulación y gestión de la investigación.

ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics of the Clinical Trials (CT) supervised by the Institute of Health Technology Assessment and Research carried out in EsSalud between 2015 and 2018 and the main observations of the supervisions completed. A descriptive study of 82 supervised clinical trials was conducted between 2015 and 2018. Most of the clinical trials were phase III studies (81.7%); the most frequent route of administration of the study products was oral (47.6%), and most were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry (96.3%). The most frequent observations were those related to the study contract (83.8%), overhead payment (57.3%), and the lack of regulatory documents (47.6%). These findings allow the identification of opportunities for improvement in research regulation and management.

[The incorporation of nusinersen by the Brazilian Unified National Health System: critical thoughts on the institutionalization of health technology assessment in Brazil]. / A incorporação do nusinersena no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma reflexão crítica sobre a institucionalização da avaliação de tecnologias em saúde no Brasil.

In April 2019, a ruling was signed for the incorporation of the drug nusinersen by the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). Nusinersen is the most expensive drug ever incorporated by the SUS and is used to treat type I 5q spinal muscular atrophy. The incorporation has been described as a milestone in decision-making on new technologies in the SUS, enabled through a risk-sharing agreement. The article discusses the process involved in the incorporation of nusinersen, highlighting the context, timing, and technical issues, in addition to possible consequences for the institutionalization of health technology assessment (HTA) in the SUS. The study used an exploratory method, reviewing public information produced by the Commission for Incorporation of Technologies in the SUS (CONITEC) and searches in government databanks on prices and purchases. A timeline was produced, describing the key points in the process of incorporation. There were two formal requests for the drug's incorporation. The first was submitted by the Division of Science, Technology, and Strategic Inputs (SCTIE) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health and was turned down unanimously in November 2018. This was followed by a petition by the head of the SCTIE to the Attorney General's Office (AGU) to overrule the recommendation by the CONITEC plenary. The AGU recommended a new submission, made by the drug's manufacturing company, which was approved unanimously in March 2019. The was no addition of new evidence or a price reduction to justify the change of decision. No elements were identified in the risk-sharing agreement. This suggests problems of transparency and accountability, as well as risks in the process of institutionalization of HTA that had been underway in the SUS.

Em abril de 2019, foi assinada a portaria de incorporação do medicamento nusinersena no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). É o medicamento mais caro já incorporado ao SUS, para uso no tratamento de atrofia muscular espinhal 5q tipo I. A incorporação é referida como um marco na tomada de decisão sobre novas tecnologias no SUS, a ser viabilizada por meio de acordo de partilha de risco. O trabalho discute o processo de incorporação do nusinersena, destacando aspectos contextuais, temporais e técnicos, além de possíveis consequências para a institucionalização da avaliação de tecnologias em saúde (ATS) no SUS. Seguiu método exploratório, com revisão de informações públicas produzidas pela Comissão de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS (CONITEC) e busca em bancos de dados governamentais de preços e compras. Foi produzida linha temporal descrevendo os pontos-chave do processo de incorporação. Houve dois pedidos de incorporação do medicamento. O primeiro, submetido pela Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos (SCTIE) do Ministério da Saúde, negado por unanimidade, em novembro de 2018. Seguiu-se o pedido do Secretário da SCTIE à Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU), para que pudesse decidir de forma contrária à recomendação do plenário da CONITEC. A AGU recomendou uma nova submissão, feita pela empresa produtora e aprovada por unanimidade, em março de 2019. Não houve acréscimo de novas evidências ou redução de preço que justificassem a mudança de decisão. Não foram identificados os elementos constituintes do acordo de partilha de risco. São sinalizados problemas de transparência e accountability, bem como riscos ao processo de institucionalização da ATS que vinha em curso no SUS.

Resumen: En abril de 2019, se firmó el decreto de incorporación del medicamento nusinersén en el Sistema Único de Salud brasileño (SUS). Es el medicamento más caro que se ha incorporado al SUS para su uso en el tratamiento de la atrofia muscular espinal 5q tipo I. La incorporación del mismo está considerada como un marco de referencia en la toma de decisiones sobre nuevas tecnologías en el SUS, que puede ser viable mediante el acuerdo de distribución de riesgo. El trabajo discute el proceso de incorporación del nusinersén, destacando aspectos contextuales, temporales y técnicos, además de posibles consecuencias para la institucionalización de la evaluación de tecnologías en salud (ETS) en el SUS. El trabajo siguió el método exploratorio, con una revisión de la información pública, generada por la Comisión de Incorporación de Tecnologías en el SUS (CONITEC) y la búsqueda en bancos de datos gubernamentales de precios y compras. Se creó una línea temporal, describiendo los puntos-clave del proceso de incorporación. Hubo dos peticiones de incorporación del medicamento. La primera, sometida a la Secretaría de Ciencia, Tecnología e Insumos Estratégicos (SCTIE) del Ministerio de Salud, rechazada por unanimidad, en noviembre de 2018. A lo que le siguió la petición del Secretario de la SCTIE a la Abogacía-General de la Unión (AGU), para que pudiese decidir en otro sentido respecto a la recomendación del pleno de la CONITEC. La AGU recomendó una nueva remisión, realizada por la empresa productora y aprobada por unanimidad, en marzo de 2019. No se produjo un incremento de nuevas evidencias o una reducción del precio que justificasen el cambio de decisión. No se identificaron los elementos constituyentes del acuerdo de distribución de riesgo. Se señalaron los problemas de transparencia y rendición de cuentas, así como riesgos para el proceso de institucionalización de la ETS que estaba en curso en el SUS.

[Supervision of clinical trials in Social Health Insurance at Peruvian Hospitals: administrative and regulatory approach]. / Supervisión de ensayos clínicos en hospitales del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú: enfoque administrativo y regulatorio.

The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics of the Clinical Trials (CT) supervised by the Institute of Health Technology Assessment and Research carried out in EsSalud between 2015 and 2018 and the main observations of the supervisions completed. A descriptive study of 82 supervised clinical trials was conducted between 2015 and 2018. Most of the clinical trials were phase III studies (81.7%); the most frequent route of administration of the study products was oral (47.6%), and most were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry (96.3%). The most frequent observations were those related to the study contract (83.8%), overhead payment (57.3%), and the lack of regulatory documents (47.6%). These findings allow the identification of opportunities for improvement in research regulation and management.

El objetivo del estudio fue describir las características de los ensayos clínicos (EC) supervisados por el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación en EsSalud entre el 2015 y 2018 y las principales observaciones de las supervisiones realizadas. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de 82 ensayos clínicos supervisados entre 2015 y 2018. La mayoría de los ensayos clínicos fueron estudios de fase III (81,7%), la vía de administración más frecuente de los productos de estudio fue oral (47,6%) y la mayoría fueron patrocinados por la industria farmacéutica (96,3%). Las observaciones más frecuentes fueron las relacionadas al contrato de estudio (83,8%), al pago por concepto de overhead (57,3%) y a la falta de documentos regulatorios (47,6%). Estos hallazgos permiten la identificación de oportunidades de mejora en la regulación y gestión de la investigación.

A incorporação do nusinersena no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma reflexão crítica sobre a institucionalização da avaliação de tecnologias em saúde no Brasil / The incorporation of nusinersen by the Brazilian Unified National Health System: critical thoughts on the institutionalization of health technology assessment in Brazil / La incorporación del nusinersén al Sistema Único de Salud: una reflexión crítica sobre la institucionalización de la evaluación de tecnologías en salud en Brasil

Resumo: Em abril de 2019, foi assinada a portaria de incorporação do medicamento nusinersena no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). É o medicamento mais caro já incorporado ao SUS, para uso no tratamento de atrofia muscular espinhal 5q tipo I. A incorporação é referida como um marco na tomada de decisão sobre novas tecnologias no SUS, a ser viabilizada por meio de acordo de partilha de risco. O trabalho discute o processo de incorporação do nusinersena, destacando aspectos contextuais, temporais e técnicos, além de possíveis consequências para a institucionalização da avaliação de tecnologias em saúde (ATS) no SUS. Seguiu método exploratório, com revisão de informações públicas produzidas pela Comissão de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS (CONITEC) e busca em bancos de dados governamentais de preços e compras. Foi produzida linha temporal descrevendo os pontos-chave do processo de incorporação. Houve dois pedidos de incorporação do medicamento. O primeiro, submetido pela Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos (SCTIE) do Ministério da Saúde, negado por unanimidade, em novembro de 2018. Seguiu-se o pedido do Secretário da SCTIE à Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU), para que pudesse decidir de forma contrária à recomendação do plenário da CONITEC. A AGU recomendou uma nova submissão, feita pela empresa produtora e aprovada por unanimidade, em março de 2019. Não houve acréscimo de novas evidências ou redução de preço que justificassem a mudança de decisão. Não foram identificados os elementos constituintes do acordo de partilha de risco. São sinalizados problemas de transparência e accountability, bem como riscos ao processo de institucionalização da ATS que vinha em curso no SUS.

Abstract: In April 2019, a ruling was signed for the incorporation of the drug nusinersen by the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). Nusinersen is the most expensive drug ever incorporated by the SUS and is used to treat type I 5q spinal muscular atrophy. The incorporation has been described as a milestone in decision-making on new technologies in the SUS, enabled through a risk-sharing agreement. The article discusses the process involved in the incorporation of nusinersen, highlighting the context, timing, and technical issues, in addition to possible consequences for the institutionalization of health technology assessment (HTA) in the SUS. The study used an exploratory method, reviewing public information produced by the Commission for Incorporation of Technologies in the SUS (CONITEC) and searches in government databanks on prices and purchases. A timeline was produced, describing the key points in the process of incorporation. There were two formal requests for the drug's incorporation. The first was submitted by the Division of Science, Technology, and Strategic Inputs (SCTIE) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health and was turned down unanimously in November 2018. This was followed by a petition by the head of the SCTIE to the Attorney General's Office (AGU) to overrule the recommendation by the CONITEC plenary. The AGU recommended a new submission, made by the drug's manufacturing company, which was approved unanimously in March 2019. The was no addition of new evidence or a price reduction to justify the change of decision. No elements were identified in the risk-sharing agreement. This suggests problems of transparency and accountability, as well as risks in the process of institutionalization of HTA that had been underway in the SUS.

Resumen: En abril de 2019, se firmó el decreto de incorporación del medicamento nusinersén en el Sistema Único de Salud brasileño (SUS). Es el medicamento más caro que se ha incorporado al SUS para su uso en el tratamiento de la atrofia muscular espinal 5q tipo I. La incorporación del mismo está considerada como un marco de referencia en la toma de decisiones sobre nuevas tecnologías en el SUS, que puede ser viable mediante el acuerdo de distribución de riesgo. El trabajo discute el proceso de incorporación del nusinersén, destacando aspectos contextuales, temporales y técnicos, además de posibles consecuencias para la institucionalización de la evaluación de tecnologías en salud (ETS) en el SUS. El trabajo siguió el método exploratorio, con una revisión de la información pública, generada por la Comisión de Incorporación de Tecnologías en el SUS (CONITEC) y la búsqueda en bancos de datos gubernamentales de precios y compras. Se creó una línea temporal, describiendo los puntos-clave del proceso de incorporación. Hubo dos peticiones de incorporación del medicamento. La primera, sometida a la Secretaría de Ciencia, Tecnología e Insumos Estratégicos (SCTIE) del Ministerio de Salud, rechazada por unanimidad, en noviembre de 2018. A lo que le siguió la petición del Secretario de la SCTIE a la Abogacía-General de la Unión (AGU), para que pudiese decidir en otro sentido respecto a la recomendación del pleno de la CONITEC. La AGU recomendó una nueva remisión, realizada por la empresa productora y aprobada por unanimidad, en marzo de 2019. No se produjo un incremento de nuevas evidencias o una reducción del precio que justificasen el cambio de decisión. No se identificaron los elementos constituyentes del acuerdo de distribución de riesgo. Se señalaron los problemas de transparencia y rendición de cuentas, así como riesgos para el proceso de institucionalización de la ETS que estaba en curso en el SUS.

Miracle drug: Brazil approves never-tested cancer medicine.

Background Brazil recently approved synthetic phosphoetanolamine, a popularly dubbed 'cancer pill', a substance that has been shown to kill cancer cells in lab animal models but was not yet formally accessed in humans, and thus despite the existence of any evidence of its efficacy and safety. Methods The authors describe the recent decision of Brazil to aprove phosphoetanolamine in the context of growing 'judicialization' to promote access to medicines and thus reinforcing a growing sense of legal uncertainty. Results The approval of phosphoetanolamine despite the existence of any evidence of its efficacy and safety represents to the authors one of the saddest and surrealistic episodes in Brazil's recent public health history. Brazil's current economic crisis is fueling the 'judicialization' to promote access to medicines and thus reinforcing a growing sense of legal uncertainty in the context of rising economic constrains and a progressive failing state. The authors state that the Phosphoetanolamine's approval bill violates current legal prohibition of commercialisation of drugs without the Brazilian national drug regulatory agency's approval and thus may represent a potential menace to Brazil's pharmacogovernance and the country's governance to health technology assessment at the Brazilian national health systems. Conclusion Phosphoetanolamine's approval illustrates that the combination of flawed decision making, economic crisis and political interference may threaten weak governance mechanisms for drug regulation and health technology assessment and thus representing an extra burden in the sustainability of universal access-based national health systems.

Health technology assessment in an argentinean province: adapting existing tools.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports on the development of a critical process for health technologies incorporation concerning an Argentinean Provincial Ministry of Health (MOH) in collaboration with the University of Lanús from 2008 to 2010. METHODS: We describe the approach developed to adapt selected international experiences to provincial scenario. Bibliographic review, regulations examination, key informants interviews and iterative adjustments after various stages of consultation and consensus building with main local players, contribution from foreign experts, and piloting of process and instruments for ultimate fine-tuning are described. We examine final proposal in the light of new updated studies. RESULTS: Analysis of regulations revealed that rules governing the provincial system were historically linked to administrative resolutions in relation to procurement with poor consideration to clinical, epidemiological, organizational, and health policy aspects. Key informants from hospitals, MOH, and other governmental agencies agreed on the lack of a process capable of guaranteeing a decision about health technology incorporation based on a transparent use of the best available information, ready to deal with competitive pressures. This adaptation provided a structured and explicit process (introduction, implementation, and development) as well as essential and supporting tools. CONCLUSIONS: MOH adopted the proposal for its progressive implementation while institutional evaluation capacity develops. Further studies are needed on the value placed on health technology assessment-based processes and recommendations by clinicians, managers, policy makers, and patients.

National guidelines for high-cost drugs in Brazil: achievements and constraints of an innovative national evidence-based public health policy.

INTRODUCTION: The translation of best evidence into practice has become an important purpose of policy making in health care. In Brazil, a country of continental dimensions with widespread regional and social inequalities, the dissemination and use of the best-evidence in policy making is a critical issue for the healthcare system. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study is to describe an evidence-based public health policy with special emphasis on guidelines creation for high-cost medicines. We also describe how that strategy was diffused to the judiciary system and to other parts of the healthcare system. RESULTS: We present an 11-year follow-up of a national project for creating and updating guidelines for high-cost medicines in Brazil. A total of 109 national guidelines were published (new or updated versions) for 66 selected diseases, the first such effort in Brazilian history. The project influenced the Brazilian legislature, which has recently established a Federal Law requiring national guidelines for any new technology listed for payment by the Brazilian public healthcare system. CONCLUSION: We were able to involve many different stakeholders in a partnership between academia and policy makers, which made possible the widespread dissemination of the clinical practice guidelines. Problems and constraints were also encountered. This evolving public health strategy might be useful for other developing countries.