RESUMO
Nine years after the earthquake in Haiti and the appearance of the concept of “humanitarian drones”, it remains a poorly discussed yet highly controversial issue. Emergency mapping and light cargo deliveries to inaccessible areas are only some of the most popular ways in which drones are currently used for post-disaster relief and health crisis management by first responders around the world. On the other hand, every single successful use for drones is always followed by controversy about the problems caused by that very same, initially successful, use. However, examples of good practices will contribute to the investigation, study and analysis of the ways in which new, cutting-edge technologies such as drones can be implemented and adapted to meet the needs and requirements of humanitarian organisations and local communities affected by disasters. The issue is how and under what circumstances drone use can potentially fulfil humanitarian functions, particularly in the aftermath of a disaster, and how this type of technology could be deployed in non-violent, ethically desirable ways as part of the humanitarian response. In conclusion, it is questionable whether the benefits of using drones outnumber the moral obstacles they raise, and whether they will eventually be considered an inseparable part of humanitarian aid as well as a cutting-edge technological toy.
Assuntos
Aviação/instrumentação , Planejamento em Desastres , Socorro em Desastres/ética , Telemedicina/instrumentação , Aviação/ética , Desastres , Terremotos , Haiti , Humanos , Telemedicina/éticaAssuntos
Aviação , Direitos Civis , Robótica , Crimes de Guerra , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Aviação/ética , Aviação/instrumentação , Instituições de Caridade/métodos , Direitos Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos Civis/psicologia , Humanos , Internacionalidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Guerra Psicológica , Robótica/economia , Robótica/legislação & jurisprudência , Robótica/métodos , Robótica/estatística & dados numéricos , Crimes de Guerra/ética , Crimes de Guerra/legislação & jurisprudência , Crimes de Guerra/prevenção & controleRESUMO
During summer 2009, the UK experienced one of the highest incidences of H1N1 infection outside of the Americas and Australia. Building on existing research into biosecurity and the spread of infectious disease via the global airline network, this paper explores the biopolitics of public health in the UK through an in-depth empirical analysis of the representation of H1N1 in UK national and regional newspapers. We uncover new discourses relating to the significance of the airport as a site for control and the ethics of the treatment of the traveller as a potential transmitter of disease. We conclude by highlighting how the global spread of infectious diseases is grounded in particular localities associated with distinctive notions of biosecurity and the traveller.